All about the cinema

Terminator Salvation film review: a mind-mulching McG-directed migraine-maker

Terminator SalvationRed lightTerminator Salvation is based in a not-too-distant future where computers appear to have taken a violent stand against Windows Vista and where human beings lie scattered across the planet in small pockets of resistance fighters, living amongst rubble and ruin, inhaling the cinders of mankind and rueing the day alt-control-delete stopped working.

Director McG, whose name and level of cinematic comprehension resembles that of a burger, applies his ham-n-cheese fist to the Terminator franchise and cooks up a hardcore action sci-fi: hardcore in the sense that this agonisingly loud movie generates more gunfire than a pro-George Bush parade in Israel and a running time with at least as many explosions as there are minutes.

Terminator Salvation is set in a post-apocalyptic post-Vista 2018 and John Connor (Christian Bale) is regarded as something of a prophet, like Neo from The Matrix. There are wild theories out there suggesting the two series can be stuck together to form a relatively fluent narrative. I sense an essay that somebody – certainly not me – might like to write.

The future that Connor was raised to believe is shook up by the appearance of Marcus Write (Sam Worthington) who we first meet as a man on death row. Anybody who’s watched the trailer will have had the twist concerning his character carelessly spoilt, in the unlikely event they couldn’t have figured it out for themselves. Suffice to say Write is integral in the nefarious plot from Skynet, the robot manufacturing company with a presumably excellent share price, to eradicate humankind and put an end to error reports for good.

But discussion of even the broadest of storytelling strokes seems to be missing the point: McG treats the gig as a pass card for barraging the audience’s senses and the movie consists of characters running from explosions and gunfire, darting from one robot-terrorized location to the next, pausing only to catch a breath and grumble something about a) courage or b) futility. When your life’s spent battling maniacal robots, it’s gotta be a fine line.

The action is brought to head-pounding life with an excruciating soundtrack, each cataclysmic effect seemingly engineered to blast more brain cells than the last. No one should see this movie with a hangover.

The techno broth of beeps and squeals and pulsating ear-bashers is peppered, somewhat incredibly, with snippets of Danny Elfman, whose score fights to be heard in a sea of vibrations and mechanical mash-ups, and it all boils into a nerve-jangling stew of metallic-sounding thuds, whirrs, wails and wallops, which feel obscenely futuristic in an indescribably wrong kinda way – like (here goes) a group of raunchy robots engaged in an electronic gang bang with half-animal cyborgs and a bunch of cloned Richard Nixons.

This ravaged futuristic world, crushed and pulverised by machinery (oh the humanity!) resembles a planet used as a stomping ground for a robot equivalent of Woodstock, the earth left trashed and weltering in its aftermath, and no matter how many times Christian Bale says “this is John Connor…” some poor robo-sod still has to pick up the trash – the empty cans of bootleg WD40, the used wrappers of anti-virus protection strewn across the cement…

The sheer sound and fury and remorselessness of Terminator Salvation made this 27-year-old film reviewer feel old and jaded, like Clint Eastwood from Gran Torino. I felt like hollering “will you buggers keep it down!” not at audience members but at the movie itself. The absence of story is what done it. Make brain go bad. By game’s end I was walloped into despair, tired and fed up by all these metallic nasty pasties, and, sick of seeing their ugly robo-skeletal faces, I wished they would bugger off and get a cyber life – go to a clubmed.com or a seedy chat room, have a robo boogie, down a few terrabytes of alcohcom…Whatever. Just leave me out of it.

The first two (James Cameron-directed) Terminator movies were quality but the revival of the series in 2003 (Rise of the Machines) was crap and the fourth arguably worse. Christian Bale, whose acting career is becoming more of a joke with every new performance, doesn’t improve things by employing an only slightly scaled down version of the 20-a-day don’t-shower-and-proud-of-it voice he used to ghastly effect in the Batman movies. “If we attack tonight, our humanity is lost forever,” he grumbles. Well, that may be so, but isn’t it a little too late for you Christian? To cap off McG’s hammy movie migraine, the director throws in a super-sized side of god-awful voice over about how you can’t program the human heart. Arnold Schwarzenegger was never a person employed to make a movie more credible, but surely even he wouldn’t have stood for this.

15 Comments

  1. Daz
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    That gravel voice from Christian Bale almost derailed The Dark Knight. Such great acting from Heath Ledger on one side of the screen and Christian Bale’s ridiculous voice on the other.

  2. Sharon
    Posted June 3, 2009 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    I used to love Christian Bale but now I’m not so sure. He’s getting all the huge roles but credibility going down down down. I guess that’s the standard trajectory.

  3. DL
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    Crikey’s recent film review suggests of the new Terminator film that “this agonisingly loud movie generates more gunfire than a pro-George Bush parade in Israel”. Excuse me? It is the Arabs who are famous for firing their guns in the air, not the Jews. In Jordan, celebratory gunfire causes problems when students receive their high school graduation certificates. In Lebanon, three people died and eight were wounded in a single night of “celebratory gunfire” following the election of a new speaker of parliament. Imagine the bodycount if they won the World Cup! Actually, don’t. These people are batsh*t crazy, yet your correspondent is inventing nonsense about Israel. In contrast, for an example of the shenanigans at a typical Jewish celebration, perhaps your metaphor challenged film critic should rent a copy of Fiddler on the Roof. It was just a stupid comment.

    Another frequent Crikey contributor, Antony Loewenstein has built a career from commenting negatively about Israel, despite having only ever set foot in the place for a few weeks, and now this. Is having absolutely no idea about Israel yet slagging it off regardless, now a pre-requisite for writing in Crikey? Grow up.

  4. Jill
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 1:09 am | Permalink

    “..hardcore in the sense that this agonisingly loud movie generates more gunfire than a pro-George Bush parade in Israel and a running time with at least as many explosions as there are minutes….”

    Yes, you found a fabulous metaphor with absolutely no basis in reality and you decided to go for it, probably in the name of attempted comedy.

    Bad move.

  5. Danny Kidron
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 1:25 am | Permalink

    “….more gunfire than a pro-George Bush parade in Israel…” ?????
    You seem to have your cultures mixed up. It is Arabs who celabrate with gunfire, not Israelis. But i suppose if you now repeat it over and over, the lie that Israelis celabrate with gunfire will become “truth” just like all the other endlessly repeated lies about Israel are becoming “truths”. Herman Gurbels would have been impressed – and supportive.

  6. Posted June 4, 2009 at 9:35 am | Permalink

    Who said anything about firing guns in the air? Appreciate the feedback but you guys shouldn’t be getting your knickers in a knot over this. I mentioned nothing of celebratory rounds of gunfire pointed at the skies. No. If you’re marching in a George Bush parade through the streets of Jerusalem – I’m envisioning tickertape, confetti, inflatable George Bush heads, American flags everywhere, maybe some Budweiser – what sort of reaction do you think you’d get? Unanimous approval? A cheerleading chant perhaps? The key to the city?

    Of course not. A violent reaction isn’t exactly out of the question, thus my ‘generate more gunfire’ quip which – you’re absolutely right – could apply to many different countries. Hell, it could even apply to certain sections of the USA. So please, let us not detract from the Serious Messages I laboriously espoused in this review: namely that Christian Bale’s credibility is going down the gurgler, McG has the cinematic comprehension level a cheeseburger and Terminator Salvation gave me a headache.

  7. SP
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    Yikes! Bale is a loose cannon! Someone needs to sit him down and teach him how to control his voice – first batman, then the director stunt on set, now this. Tut-tut. I’m giving it a miss. Bring back Arnie!

  8. Daniel Lewis
    Posted June 4, 2009 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Luke,

    I appreciate your initial comment was stupid, and not necessarily malicious. But seriously, your subsequent comment, above, has to be one of the most pathetic attempts at backpedalling I’ve ever seen. Just admit it was stupid and we can move on.

  9. Xander
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    Sorry, but this was much better than the third film. Certainly it was cliched at times, but I think a) that’s hard to avoid with a film that is building on something so referential, and b) they recogised that with references such as the Newt like character which paid homage to Cameron. A war film should not be quiet, calm or focus on character exposition – we have had three films to build character, this is the next stage of the story – we know who John Connor is.

  10. Daz
    Posted June 5, 2009 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think you’re going to win that argument Luke. If someone (I suspect all those posts come from the same person) us prepared to take a throwaway line from a tongur in cheek film review out of context and try to bash you on the head with it, they are not going to listen to reason. It’s a baby/bottle thing

  11. Posted June 9, 2009 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    I think this review would’ve benefited from discussing the structure and shortcomings of the movie than the reviewer trying to be funny. For f**k’s sake. And great backpedalling. Congratulations for becoming the very thing you despise.

  12. Sabstance
    Posted June 11, 2009 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Hated the movie! made no impression. I also loved Christian Bale from The Prestige to HarshTimes (Not Batman) But lets face it Terminator is a bore!

  13. Heathdon McGregor
    Posted June 12, 2009 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    I cant see the ads for this flick without thinking of reign of fire. I was scared off by McG. Style over substance.

    Can anybody remember how many explosions /action scenes were in the original. I didn’t think there were that many. I remember a thriller.

  14. Sam
    Posted June 13, 2009 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Luke, please take more care with your off-the-cuff insight in to Middle Eastern relations. And while you are at it, quit your stereotyping of people(s) who like to pop off a few rounds from their AK-47s at homecoming parades!! (By the way, who is Herman Gurbels? Or is it Hermann Goering? Or Joseph Goebbels? Gilbert Grape perhaps!?!)

    All seriousness aside, I am glad to be able to read a “yeah but it is way cool robots ‘n’ shit!!!!!” free review on the latest in our future doom.

    Christian did make some good movies at one stage, hopefully it wasn’t an accident on his part! I think I will wait for DVD on this one – with the volume turned down mayhap.

  15. Posted August 2, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Terminator Salvation is a very good movie. It is obvious that even without Schwarzenegger the movie can be good. The action scenes are top-notch.

2 Trackbacks

  1. ...] Terminator Salvation movie review: a mind-mulching McG-directed … Related ArticlesBookmarksTags Film Review: Trying our patients by Diana Wichtel | New [...

  2. By terminator films - StartTags.com on January 29, 2010 at 12:16 am

    ...] worked because the characters were fleshed out, and we believed in them and cared about them. …Terminator Salvation film review: a mind-mulching McG …Terminator Salvation film review: a mind-mulching McG-directed migraine-maker. June 3, 2009 10:36 [...

Post a Comment

Register now to join the conversation instantly, or log in to post a comment now.