tip off
13

Eric Bana in past, present and future (Trailer Watch: The Time Traveller’s Wife)

The Time Traveler's WifeThere are groan-inducing trailers and then there are trailers as vomit-in-your-lap toxic as the trailer (watch it below) for Eric Bana’s upcoming romantic drama The Time Traveller’s Wife, which, based on a novel by Audrey Niffenegger, follows Clare (Rachel McAdams) and her life-long romance with Henry (Bana). Henry drifts uncontrollably through time (cue unintended laughter) apparently afflicted with a genetic mutation that involuntarily propels him between past, present and future. Ahem.

The film has been long delayed, reportedly because production had to wait for Bana’s hair to grow back after he shaved it to play Romulan in Star Trek, which is one of his better performances. What people tend to forget about Bana is that he has one and only one great performance to his name, and that is of course the mesmerising slice of mimicry he exhibited as Mark Brandon Reed in Andrew Dominik’s Chopper. On the back of that one performance Bana’s career in Hollywood took off, even though his acting is generally cheesy, weightless, unchallenging stuff (i.e. Hulk, Troy and Lucky You). On first glimpses The Time Traveller’s Wife resembles Bana at his wishy-washy worst, all pensive glances and lovesick puppy dog smiles. It seems a crime Sandra Bullock wasn’t recruited as his co-star, given her penchant for what we in the industry affectionately call ‘chick flick crapola.’

13

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    SP
    Posted June 14, 2009 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    yikes. looks like a stinker for sure. Is it just me or is it disturbing that the trailer suggests that Bana’s character falls in love with a 5 year old? Creeeeee-peeeeeeee! In terms of Bana’s performances I can’t go past the character ‘Poiter’ (Peter the denim-clad bogan)!

  • 2
    Tablitha
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    What a silly statement Bana only got one great performance under his belt. You obviously haven’t seen Romulus My Father or Munich? I personally think he’s a great actor. I for one enjoyed the trailor, though have read the book so understand the emotions portrayed better – its a real tear jerker but fascinating reading you should give it a go.

  • 3
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 9:13 am | Permalink

    Bit harsh – thought Bana was good in Munich, and in Romulus, My Father (he did win the Best Actor AFI award for it). His bit role in Black Hawk Down is also good.

  • 4
    Amazing Dan
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    ‘cuse me, but why has nobody mentioned Con Petropoulous from The Castle? Now _that_ is a great performance. “Kickboxing 24 hours a-day!”

  • 5
    david
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 10:05 am | Permalink

    When I heard that Bana had been cast as Henry I feared that one of my favourite books would be turned into sentimental、hollywoodised pap.
    Looks like my fears have been realised.

    I urge you to read the book so any “unintended laughter” about the plot will be stifled and any concerns about “creeeeepiness” will be allayed.

    Great book.

  • 6
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Romulus, My Father and Munich were well made films (yes I have seen them both) but would you leave the cinema after either of them saying “man, Eric Bana was great in that movie!” You might say it was well acted or the performance was decent, but a great performance needs to have a wow factor – needs to get tongues excitedly wagging afterwards. Like Bana’s performance in Chopper.

  • 7
    charlotte
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    I was positively surprised when I saw the trailer, I think it looked rather good, cheesy, maybe, but real life tends to be very cheesy surprisingly often imo! – Eric Bana seems to be very cool and laid back man . I have no problems at all with his acting style, but I can understand if some don´t like it. And I must say that I really appreciate such a tall and good looking man for a change, instead of all the pretty boys, aging teenagers and funny looking little guys in H-wood lol lol!

  • 8
    BonnieLincoln
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    I appreciate that Bana doesn’t usually over-ham his role… he’s not a distracting actor to me like Brad Pitt or Jack Nicholson, where I feel like I’m watching Brad Pitt instead of a character the whole movie.

    He is a very simple actor, which has its negatives and positives.

    I do think him rather handsome though… cute crow’s feet.

    As for this movie, it’s pretty STUPID… *sigh* I wish he’d less romantic sheiss.

  • 9
    Sam
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Bana’s role(s) in Full Frontal are enough to forever cement him as an all time great in my mind – or what is left of it. Add to that, as Dan said, Con from The Castle… what more could you need?

    Credit where credit is due Luke.

  • 10
    andrew
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Bana is fantastic, but his comic history makes it hard for me to take him seriously in dramatic roles. Always seems like a skit, but it’s not his fault, I can’t change my perception.

    This movie looks like pap, but he’s likely now in the Mark Ruffalo sphere where he’ll do a sappy/commercial movie but then hopefully leverage it into some better films too.

  • 11
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    The simple truth is almost nobody has more than one truly *great* performance in them. If we were to agree Bana has one great performance and another of other good ones: well, that’s a pretty good return.

  • 12
    andy
    Posted June 15, 2009 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, only one great performance? What about Jumanji and..ah.. Twister.

  • 13
    Murf
    Posted June 16, 2009 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    I think that the first mental image of Eric Bana as the somewhat tortured young librarian of “Time Traveller’s Wife” had me in some turmoil. Any hype about “man falls in love with 5-year-old” will only make people who haven’t read the book shy away from the movie- so it appears that the movie won’t get an unprejudiced go at the audience it deserves. I can’t say what it will be like until I’ve seen the film version, but I’d urge everyone to read the book- a great piece of modern writing- no time lords and not confusing if you concentrate hard!

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...