All about the cinema

Where the Wild Things Are film review: strange, beautiful, simple things

   

Where the Wild Things AreGreen lightSpike Jonze’s big screen adaptation of Maurice Sendak’s well-loved children’s picture book Where the Wild Things Are feels, well, a lot like a picture book, relying on beautiful images and an uncomplicated narrative and echoing familiar themes of forgiveness, family and the value of a good home.

Padding out the tersely told story of an impish child who visits a magical world of weird looking creatures to a running time of 101 minutes necessitated a significant amount of expansion (the book is just 10 sentences long) but the huge surprise is that not a great deal has been added to the source material despite its brevity. Instead of developing an extensive plotline Jonze opts to add new proverbial pages to the book, simple thing like slumber parties, cubby houses and play fighting extending the narrative to logical points of extrapolation.

Max (Max Records) is a boisterous young’un who one fateful eve has a barney with his mum. He stands on the kitchen bench demanding to be fed and, for an encore, bites her on the shoulder. (FYI, I too have some experience being bitten by a human. When I was 8 my best friend, frustrated that I would not give him a ball – I maintain to this day, it was MINE – lunged at me and bit me on the back. I was taken to the GP for a rabies shot [yes, he was animalistic]. My permanent medical record reads “bitten on back by friend.” ) Upset, Max runs away and sails to a distant land populated by weird massive beasts. A few of them – particularly Carol (voiced authoritatively by James Gandolfini) – look like H.R. Pufnstuf crossed with Yogi Bear. At first the beasts want to eat Max but Max talks his way out, assuring them he has special powers. Max becomes king and his first line of business is to echo the book’s catch-cry: “let the wild rumpus begin!”

Fun and frivolity ensue but soon Max learns that life is complicated even in this apparent utopia. Factions exist within the wild things society; there are histories and grievances and grudges, and clashing personalities jar the dynamic between them. The new world loses its shine and, no surprises here, Max feels a growing inkling to return to his true home.

Shot, designed and edited with consummate style, the film’s visual structure is extraordinary: strange, amorous and bewitching, it’s an alurring mixture of puppets and CGI set in front of vast lens-buckling backgrounds. Most of the film takes place in a spirited faraway land, a sort of Honalee, a place clearly capable of existing only within the prisms of a child’s imagination. Instead of stuffing the frame with detail –a trap a lot of kids movies fall into, particularly in animation – Jonze understands the value of restraint and of basic ideas translated into beautiful pictures.

Where the Wild Things Are has a brilliant sparseness, a majestic openness with lots of long and mid shots soaking in the rustic Australian terrain (most it was shot in Victoria). The beasts themselves look glorious: lifelike, otherworldly, real enough to touch but enhanced with a subtle CGI sheen. In terms of visual accomplishments Where the Wild Things Are is up there with the stunning handmade inventions exhibited in Labyrinth (1986) and The Dark Crystal (1982) though this time editing room finesses have added a glossy veneer but the effects have been used moderately, like spray on enhancer rather than tools for rendering and creation.

There are some lovely touches. A goodbye scene is handled with admirable, heart-warming restraint: nothing needs to be said but the emotional gravity of the moment speaks voluminously about forgiveness, tolerance and mutual respect.

The atmospheric properties of Where the Wild Things Are are so strong they compensate for the languid storyline, which lacks narrative flair. Ironically this is probably Jonze’s strongest asset as a storyteller, though perhaps only with the aid of bonkers-brilliant writer Charlie Kaufman (Being John Malkovich [1999] and Adaptation [2002]).

With a more pronounced storyline the film, however, would inevitably grow more estranged from the simple elegance of the source material. That’s a catch 22 that could have been negotiated better by Jonze, who tapers over the lack of plot by focusing almost solely on Max’s relationships with the wild things. However Where the Wild Things Are hangs together as an enriching experience, partly because it takes place in that cuddly childlike world, imaginative and partly nonsensical, where things don’t need to be complicated and simple joys can become soul-nourishing profundities.

Where the Wild Things Are’s Australian theatrical release date: December 3, 2009.

3 Comments

  1. 1
    Posted December 4, 2009 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    You’re so right about that underplayed farewell – I’ve replayed it in my own mind constantly since seeing this.

    Another insightful and entertaining read, as always my good man.

  2. 2
    erudition_wookie
    Posted December 6, 2009 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    I saw it last night and….loved it.
    You’re right Luke that the story is simplistic, but I can’t see how Spike Jonze could have done it another way and still remained so faithful to the book.

  3. 3
    Posted December 11, 2009 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    ...] Where the Wild Things Are film review: strange, beautiful, simple … [...

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.