tip off
6

Arthur movie review: another rubbishy remake

The makers of Arthur would like you to believe that Russell Brand’s trademark shtick — the outspoken androgynous wastoid — is a contemporary equivalent of the leisurely comedic style of Dudley Moore, star of the Oscar-winning 1981 hit on which director Jason Winer’s rubbishy remake is based.

With baked eyes, slippery British enunciation and a real life history of drug and sex addiction, Brand embodies the freakishness of a post Michael Jackson era, of a pop culture landscape where envelope pushing artists need to work very hard to astonish, disgust and scandalise, or even to simply separate themselves from the pack.

Brand achieves the latter with effortlessness but is only capable of playing one role: the eccentric idiot, which explains his casting in Arthur, Get Him to the Greek (2010) and the upcoming remake of Drop Dead Fred.

Arthur (Brand) is a filthy rich young lad trapped inside the body of a grown alcoholic who appears to have some kind of undiagnosed intellectual disorder. Arthur gets every toy he wants, every desire catered for. In the opening scenes he dresses up as Batman, crashes his own Batmobile then showers strangers with money.

Miffed by too many ridiculous headlines, his emotionless moneybags mother gives Arthur an ultimatum: get married to the smart and sensible Susan (Jennifer Garner) or be cut off from the family fortune. Arthur agrees but meets the first girl that makes him go gah-gah — the fun-loving, pleasant and penny-less Naoimi (Greta Gerwig). So Arthur (gasp!) must choose between real love and real moolah. From that point on the boy-meets-girl plotline doesn’t deviate from precisely where you think it’s going to go.

An emotional tangent involving Arthur and his nanny Hobson (Helen Mirren) aspires to give the film some depth and achieves as much as an inflatable kids pool. It is far more effective in generating speculation about whether Helen Mirren’s credibility has finaly taken one almighty dive. Mirren emerges with her dignity intact, but only just. Not so for Russell Brand, whose slippery delivery is utterly charmless. Rather than radiating a freewheeling charm his la-di-da don’t care approach comes close to exhibiting disdain for audiences and their expectations.

Arthur is almost completely bereft of laughs. It was convenient that Brand’s character is an alcoholic; just a few scenes in it’s clear he was sloshed during the shoot, and with a script like this you’d want to be. Audiences might want to consider the same approach in order to drain whatever fun can be squeezed from this lazy and lifeless remake. Or better yet: avoid.

Arthur’s Australian theatrical release date: April 21, 2010..

6

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    R J Dent
    Posted April 26, 2011 at 6:06 am | Permalink

    Sir – in answer to your comment ‘It was convenient that Brand’s character is an alcoholic; just a few scenes in it’s clear he was sloshed during the shoot, and with a script like this you’d want to be.’ are you suggesting that Brand was drunk whilst filming? I bet you a month’s salary that you’re wrong! Brand’s a recovering alcoholic and junkie and doesn’t touch alcohol or drugs. What this means is that if you’re wrong (which I believe you are) then Brand’s acting was so good he fooled you into thinking he really was drunk (along with his character). Perhaps you should rewrite your review in light of this. Criticise the film, but praise Brand’s acting for being so good it convinced you he was drunk… Don’t worry, I won’t insist you pay me….

  • 2
    Posted April 26, 2011 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Sir/Madam:

    On the wrong sort of personality alcohol consumption can have negative effects including: loss of vitality and motivation, loss of basic motor skills, slurred or scrambled speech patterns, laziness, sloth, disregard for other people etc etc.

    Russell Brand exhibited all those vices and more in his performance in Arthur. I thought I would be kind and say that he was drunk. But if you want to tell me that all those vices come to him when he is sober….well, go right ahead. That’s a heck of a lot worse.

  • 3
    liliwyt
    Posted April 26, 2011 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    They’re remaking “Drop Dead Fred”?? Why?

  • 4
    sickofitall
    Posted April 27, 2011 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Russell Brand’s comedy is nasty, unfunny and poorly prepared. He couldn’t carry a film if it had handles. The sooner he goes back to the primordial ooze from which he came, the better.

  • 5
    CliffG
    Posted April 27, 2011 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Brand is a boor and a bore! When he went after “Manuel” he lost me permanently! EVERYTHING with him in it is worth a wide berth.

  • 6
    Neil Walker
    Posted May 3, 2011 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    I lost all respect for Helen Mirren when I saw this Wii TV ad. How much money is enough, Dame Mirren?!

    http://youtu.be/6ASSW4jvDP4

    As the late, great Bill Hicks said:

    http://youtu.be/j_YE8tkpxjg

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...