tip off
3

Blue Jasmine movie review: dramatic masterclass c/o Woody Allen and Cate Blanchett

A late-period masterstroke from the ever prolific Woody Allen offers many things, including one of Cate Blanchett’s finest performances.

Blue Jasmine

See itIn James L. Brooks’ 1997 romantic comedy As Good As It Gets, brilliant misanthropic author Melvin Udall (Jack Nicholson) is approached by a nervous doe-eyed fan who musters the courage to ask him how he writes women so well. The curmudgeon snaps back: “I think of a man. And I take away reason and accountability.”

Reason and accountability are not virtues common in the personalities of Woody Allen protagonists. They are colourful loose-lipped creatures who tend to be iterations of a single voice syndrome – that of neurotic foggy-minded people floundering about in prisons of their own anxiety.

In Blue Jasmine, a characteristically verbose Woody Allen drama given real oomph and humanity by a wide-ranging performance from Cate Blanchett, the prison is more of an asylum — a place where Allen-brand angst spills into something much more serious than mealy-mouthed shtick.

Jasmine (Blanchett) is a socialite accustomed to the spoils of high society, including a convenient marriage to Hal (Alec Baldwin). When a family/financial crisis sees her tumbling down the social ladder a class or two, Jasmine bottoms out and moves into her adopted sister Ginger’s San Francisco apartment where she struggles with money, anxiety, alcoholism and pills.

Blue Jasmine, which swings backwards and forwards in time with a melodic sense of ease, is about her trying to find a new life. Preferably one with a big house and a ring on her finger.

As Jasmine and her sister pin their hopes on new men, the film increasingly focuses on the real estate of relationships: attraction not just to a different person but a different way of life, and the vulnerabilities women in particular face in that journey.

Reason and accountability notwithstanding, Woody Allen writes women well. So well, in fact, the prolific 77-year-old (averaging an astounding one film a year) highlights the absurdity of those words, the idea that writing strong characters in cinema can be pegged down to biology or that a writer is constrained by gender.

The familiar “write what you know” mantra can be a catch-all for compromises and cop outs. Great character-based screenwriting of the kind exhibited in Blue Jasmine is a blueprint transferred from author to actor. The writer’s creation may be deeply personal, but it is nothing without a performer to turn words on a page into something living, breathing and tangible.

It may be hard to imagine Thelma and Louise as men or Rocky as a woman, but the truth is that virtually every great character in cinema could have been the opposite gender with a change in casting and context. Blanchett’s exquisite portrait of a woman adrift chips away at jewel-encrusted bourgeoisie and finds an unsettling common touch when the Persian rug is swiped from beneath her character’s feet.

Allen’s fluid approach to filmmaking allows him to play to his strengths, one of which is an understanding they aren’t his per se. Allen has never been precious with his “vision”; this is a man who dramatically readjusted the focus of Annie Hall (1977) when he realised the strength of Diane Keaton’s presence. The result was nothing short of genre-defining.

Blanchett is equally unforgettable in Blue Jasmine, and that is high praise indeed. Her jittery, yappy, sad-eyed, pill-popping, head-turning performance is a painfully humane tour de force.

Blue Jasmine’s Australian theatrical release date: September 12, 2013. 

3

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    Stephen
    Posted September 17, 2013 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Yeah, many of the US crits raved about it too, somewhat to my surprise.

    Once you get past Blanchett’s (admittedly stellar) performance, it seems to me an old-fashioned and unremarkable movie with a clunky script.

  • 2
    Jill trotter
    Posted September 20, 2013 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    yes it’s Cate’s movie certainly- she’s brilliant – rest of the cast cliched and one dimensional but I loved it nonetheless- Cate carried it for me. Liked the ending too- realistic

  • 3
    Peter Deerson
    Posted September 25, 2013 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Luke says lots of accurate things about Allen. Unfortunately they don’t represent the Jasmine I see on the screen. I’m still unsure whether the wooden, dull and unattractive screen persona is Blanchett’s fault or that of the script; most probably both.
    Most of Allen’s films do indeed present insecure and vulnerable women beautifully. This one doesn’t! I feel no empathy for the character, or interest in her position. I think a better actor could have got something out of the role, poor script or no.
    By contrast, Ginger is very good – believable and lovable. You want her to win through!
    I don’t agree that most characters are gender interchangeable in great works, incidentally. This may well be a politically incorrect statement, but I’m happy to see vulnerabilities, sensitivities and weaknesses
    nuanced through gender! I agree with Stephen’s post that this is an unremarkable and dull piece of filmmaking.

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...