<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sue Howard is Going from ABC Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/16/sue-howard-is-going-from-abc-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/16/sue-howard-is-going-from-abc-radio/</link>
	<description>Margaret Simons on Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:43:32 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What will the Katies do Next? Two New Directors at the ABC - The Content Makers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/16/sue-howard-is-going-from-abc-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>What will the Katies do Next? Two New Directors at the ABC - The Content Makers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=96#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>[...] the new Director of Radio, replacing Sue Howard, whose departure was one of the first news stories I covered on this blog. Dundas&#8217;s appointment is no surprise. She has been acting in the post since Howard&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>...] the new Director of Radio, replacing Sue Howard, whose departure was one of the first news stories I covered on this blog. Dundas&#8217;s appointment is no surprise. She has been acting in the post since Howard&#8217;s [...</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/16/sue-howard-is-going-from-abc-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=96#comment-63</guid>
		<description>Err, that should have been &quot;haven&#039;t read the follow up stories&quot;. Now here goes ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Err, that should have been &#8220;haven&#8217;t read the follow up stories&#8221;. Now here goes &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom McLoughlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/16/sue-howard-is-going-from-abc-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom McLoughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=96#comment-62</guid>
		<description>Your stories deserve more comments Marg. It&#039;s a matter of gradually building the awareness and goodwill. 

..............

On the substance of this. I have read the follow up stories but I did hear Scott on Conversation Hour local radio in Sydney about 3 weeks back (?). A most revealing aspect was: He used to work for Terry Metherell MP in the 1990ies. What exactly does this mean? Well Metherell&#039;s brief for Griener was to bring management jargon and restructure to the union dominated education sector. Scott even mentioned roaring protests out in the Domain or Macq street and wondering &#039;what have we done&#039; or similar. 

Scott is a hard man in a hard man&#039;s job, appointed by then PM Howard&#039;s proxy board (?). The fact he is now still on the deck while Howard is well past the &#039;Kiss me Hardy&#039; moment doesn&#039;t change the uniform or the discipline he&#039;s learned his later career.

In short Marg, if it looks like, walks like, quacks like ... then it is a power player, for real. That I should say is the message. It&#039;s not about skills, merit, facts, or fairness, or indeed public interest (though good politics requires a dose of that to keep up the cover). It&#039;s about power and hierarchy and whose got it. The rest is just trimmings. Now I will see your follow up reports and consider how true this analysis really is.

My questions at this point are: What is lost with Sue Howard. What has Scott got, not got, to replace her? It&#039;s not a sentimental question. If he has compromised the taxpayer&#039;s media service then he better look out because his figleaf is pretty small 12 months in to the Rudd regime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your stories deserve more comments Marg. It&#8217;s a matter of gradually building the awareness and goodwill. </p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>On the substance of this. I have read the follow up stories but I did hear Scott on Conversation Hour local radio in Sydney about 3 weeks back (?). A most revealing aspect was: He used to work for Terry Metherell MP in the 1990ies. What exactly does this mean? Well Metherell&#8217;s brief for Griener was to bring management jargon and restructure to the union dominated education sector. Scott even mentioned roaring protests out in the Domain or Macq street and wondering &#8216;what have we done&#8217; or similar. </p>
<p>Scott is a hard man in a hard man&#8217;s job, appointed by then PM Howard&#8217;s proxy board (?). The fact he is now still on the deck while Howard is well past the &#8216;Kiss me Hardy&#8217; moment doesn&#8217;t change the uniform or the discipline he&#8217;s learned his later career.</p>
<p>In short Marg, if it looks like, walks like, quacks like &#8230; then it is a power player, for real. That I should say is the message. It&#8217;s not about skills, merit, facts, or fairness, or indeed public interest (though good politics requires a dose of that to keep up the cover). It&#8217;s about power and hierarchy and whose got it. The rest is just trimmings. Now I will see your follow up reports and consider how true this analysis really is.</p>
<p>My questions at this point are: What is lost with Sue Howard. What has Scott got, not got, to replace her? It&#8217;s not a sentimental question. If he has compromised the taxpayer&#8217;s media service then he better look out because his figleaf is pretty small 12 months in to the Rudd regime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
