<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future for the ABC and SBS &#8211; Public Service, not Public Broadcasting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/</link>
	<description>Margaret Simons on Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:43:32 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=125#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Hi there - I&#039;m one of the authors. I don&#039;t think we intended to buy into long-running debates about ABC management structures. Those debates are utterly secondary to how Public Service Media can continue to meet their aims, and best serve the Australian people. The quote Margaret pulls out is important, but so is this one: 

&lt;blockquote&gt;We propose a more ambitious remit for the ABC and SBS than simply recognition - 
and funding – for their online media activities alongside radio and television. This is 
an ideal time for ABC and SBS as pubic service media to embrace a change in 
emphasis, and become &lt;em&gt;participatory public service media entities&lt;/em&gt; that embrace the 
multiplatform media environment, and harness and encourage the Australian 
people’s appetite for participatory content creation.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

With this in mind, along with the ABC &quot;core functions&quot; you mention, Bernard, I&#039;d argue that &lt;em&gt;localism&lt;/em&gt; is crucial. Newscaff might seem more important from Canberra, but the ABC looms larger as a provider of all kinds of content - in a way that goes beyond local news - the further you are from metropolitan areas. In many areas, ABC local radio is crucial to giving communities a sense of themselves, and in driving civic life. 

Speaking only for myself, I think that at a local level, the ABC&#039;s attempts to drive online user-created content, and even basic online discussion, have been pretty disastrous. Yes, they&#039;ve been underfunded, but I think that what&#039;s required beyond cash is a pretty significant cultural change.  Many people in the organisation are still clearly viewing User Created Content as a pretty insignificant add-on, whereas the opportunity exists for the ABC to bind itself even more closely with local communities, and to have a role in strengthening social capital and community identity. Changing this may have less to do with the shape of overall management structures, and more to do with the kind of service ABC staff and management see themselves as providing, and the advice they take on what sorts of platforms will be effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there &#8211; I&#8217;m one of the authors. I don&#8217;t think we intended to buy into long-running debates about ABC management structures. Those debates are utterly secondary to how Public Service Media can continue to meet their aims, and best serve the Australian people. The quote Margaret pulls out is important, but so is this one: </p>
<blockquote><p>We propose a more ambitious remit for the ABC and SBS than simply recognition &#8211;<br />
and funding – for their online media activities alongside radio and television. This is<br />
an ideal time for ABC and SBS as pubic service media to embrace a change in<br />
emphasis, and become <em>participatory public service media entities</em> that embrace the<br />
multiplatform media environment, and harness and encourage the Australian<br />
people’s appetite for participatory content creation.</p></blockquote>
<p>With this in mind, along with the ABC &#8220;core functions&#8221; you mention, Bernard, I&#8217;d argue that <em>localism</em> is crucial. Newscaff might seem more important from Canberra, but the ABC looms larger as a provider of all kinds of content &#8211; in a way that goes beyond local news &#8211; the further you are from metropolitan areas. In many areas, ABC local radio is crucial to giving communities a sense of themselves, and in driving civic life. </p>
<p>Speaking only for myself, I think that at a local level, the ABC&#8217;s attempts to drive online user-created content, and even basic online discussion, have been pretty disastrous. Yes, they&#8217;ve been underfunded, but I think that what&#8217;s required beyond cash is a pretty significant cultural change.  Many people in the organisation are still clearly viewing User Created Content as a pretty insignificant add-on, whereas the opportunity exists for the ABC to bind itself even more closely with local communities, and to have a role in strengthening social capital and community identity. Changing this may have less to do with the shape of overall management structures, and more to do with the kind of service ABC staff and management see themselves as providing, and the advice they take on what sorts of platforms will be effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Keane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 06:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=125#comment-56</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m inclined to the view that the core functions of the ABC are genuinely independent newscaff and children and youth content. They&#039;re socially critical functions that the market can never meet. Other aspects of the ABC&#039;s role, like local drama, and regional and local content, and training, are worth debate and I don&#039;t have hard and fast views - they all cost a lot of money but there may be real benefit in taxpayers funding them. The transition from public broadcasting to what you might call, unromantically, multi-platform content producers and distributors is something that has actually been handled by the ABC at least with some aplomb, despite, in the case of online, the complete lack of additional funding (they got plenty of funding for the transition to digital TV).  But what&#039;s the best strategy for completing the transition? I don&#039;t know, and I look forward to seeing what the review produces in that regard. 

But I&#039;m damn sure going round and round the mulberry bush on what sort of divisional structure to have isn&#039;t going to help at all. Not that my view matters - there&#039;s plenty of experts out there who think that if you only get the right structure in place, then everything else will follow. Good luck to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m inclined to the view that the core functions of the ABC are genuinely independent newscaff and children and youth content. They&#8217;re socially critical functions that the market can never meet. Other aspects of the ABC&#8217;s role, like local drama, and regional and local content, and training, are worth debate and I don&#8217;t have hard and fast views &#8211; they all cost a lot of money but there may be real benefit in taxpayers funding them. The transition from public broadcasting to what you might call, unromantically, multi-platform content producers and distributors is something that has actually been handled by the ABC at least with some aplomb, despite, in the case of online, the complete lack of additional funding (they got plenty of funding for the transition to digital TV).  But what&#8217;s the best strategy for completing the transition? I don&#8217;t know, and I look forward to seeing what the review produces in that regard. </p>
<p>But I&#8217;m damn sure going round and round the mulberry bush on what sort of divisional structure to have isn&#8217;t going to help at all. Not that my view matters &#8211; there&#8217;s plenty of experts out there who think that if you only get the right structure in place, then everything else will follow. Good luck to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret Simons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 03:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=125#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Hey Bernard, You clearly have a view about these &quot;more fundamental questions&quot;. Why not spit it out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bernard, You clearly have a view about these &#8220;more fundamental questions&#8221;. Why not spit it out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernard Keane</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2008/12/18/the-future-for-the-abc-and-sbs-public-service-not-public-broadcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernard Keane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 02:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=125#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The debate about structuring based on content or on platform is old and pointless - like most debates about structures.  The One ABC structure was partly intended as a content-based approach, bringing TV and radio together within the same divisions devoted to newscaff, regional, national and content production.  Jonathan Shier got rid of it, apparently to everyone&#039;s delight.  Debates about structure tend to be excuses for ducking more fundamental questions about roles, resources and implementation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The debate about structuring based on content or on platform is old and pointless &#8211; like most debates about structures.  The One ABC structure was partly intended as a content-based approach, bringing TV and radio together within the same divisions devoted to newscaff, regional, national and content production.  Jonathan Shier got rid of it, apparently to everyone&#8217;s delight.  Debates about structure tend to be excuses for ducking more fundamental questions about roles, resources and implementation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
