Margaret Simons on Media

The White House Blog, the New Media President and the Fake Stephen Conroy

   

“Change has come to the Whitehouse.gov” is the opening line to a new blog from the Obama administration’s dedicated Director of New Media,  Macon Phillips, who is charged with encouraging citizen participation using the internet.

In his first entry on the Whitehouse blog this morning, Phillips says that Obama plans to publish an unprecedented amount of information on the internet, including drafts of all non-emergency legislation, which will be released for five days for review and comment by the public.

Phillips states that his approach will have three priorities: communication, transparency and participation, drawing on Obama’s experience as a community organiser “where he saw first hand what people can do when they come together for a common purpose”.

He promises “timely and in-depth content”. The site includes a new section, called the Briefing Room, which will include slideshows (including, later today, of the Obama family’s move in to the Whitehouse) the publication of of all executive orders and proclamations, information about nominations and appointments  and a weekly video address.

Phillips anticipates using the blog to establish “an online community” which will be “a work in progress”.

The new Whitehouse website also has a new link to the Office of Public Liaison “Changing the way Americans Engage with Their Government”. It has no content at the moment, other than a “contact us” form, but promises to be the “front door to the White House through which everyone can participate and inform the work of the President.”

High hopes, and its going to be interesting to watch.

And in Australia it will be an interesting point of comparison to the Rudd administration, which was canny and innovative in its use of new media during the election campaign, but has comprehensively lost the plot since then, as the Fake Minister for Communications, Stephen Conroy delights in making apparent in this cheeky interview with ZDNet.

Here’s a taster:

Can you talk a bit about the progress of the National Broadband Network request for tender process — what’s going on, and what’s next?

No. The tendering process mandates that discussion, analysis and criticism of said process is punishable by up to 15 years in jail.

What is your opinion of the Federal Government’s relationship with Telstra? Is it good, or if not, what could be done to improve it?

Look, I don’t want to talk about our relationship, but I will say that it takes work on both sides to keep a relationship working. I know Sol is busy, but it’d be nice if he’d return my calls once in a while. Sometimes … sometimes it feels like he just doesn’t care.

2 Comments

  1. 1
    Posted January 21, 2009 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Was the Rudd campaign really so innovative, though? As I wrote for Crikey at the time, it was really just putting TVCs onto YouTube. Still just talking at us instead of with us, but on the intertubes.

    There was no dialog, no conversation, and that’s what it’s about.

    I think we only think Rudd’s campaign was innovative in that realm because the Howard campaign wasn’t really there at all.

  2. 2
    Posted January 21, 2009 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    ...] presidency and beyond, something Australia’s initially internet-savvy Rudd government has largely failed to do. Change: it’s a message that really does work when it includes everybody for the long haul. [...

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.