<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Content Makers &#187; television</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/category/television/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers</link>
	<description>Margaret Simons on Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:45:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>A-Pac Launch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/20/a-pac-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/20/a-pac-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 22:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Australian Broadcasting Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foxtel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=438</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The launch of Foxtel&#8217;s public affairs channel today means there is a fresh need to make the case for government funded public broadcasting.The ABC and pay television are going head to head in a battle for access to what is perhaps our most valuable natural resource &#8211; the broadcasting spectrum. Read more in the Crikey [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The launch of Foxtel&#8217;s public affairs channel today means there is a fresh need to make the case for government funded public broadcasting.The ABC and pay television are going head to head in a battle for access to what is perhaps our most valuable natural resource &#8211; the broadcasting spectrum. Read more in the Crikey e-mail later today.</p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]><br />
<mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --></p>
<p><!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/20/a-pac-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Business Models for Free to Air Television</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/13/new-business-models-for-free-to-air-television/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/13/new-business-models-for-free-to-air-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 23:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Margaret Simons</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/?p=360</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The problem with writing about the future of television is that most people one approaches for comment have overwhelming vested interests, and this is reflected in the &#8220;he says, she says&#8221; nature of most mainstream media writing on the topic.
Freeview types want to talk up the future of Free to Air as against Pay. Foxtel [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with writing about the future of television is that most people one approaches for comment have overwhelming vested interests, and this is reflected in the &#8220;he says, she says&#8221; nature of most mainstream media writing on the topic.</p>
<p>Freeview types want to talk up the future of Free to Air as against Pay. Foxtel types do the reverse. Public broadcasters want to tout their advantages over anyone forced to depend on the advertising dollar. Thus they talk about areas of &#8220;market failure&#8221; to back their claims on the taxpayer dollar.</p>
<p>All are defending their own particular business/funding models against the competition and the likelihood that technological change, including internet protocol television, will knock the whole current debate into a cocked hat and force everyone to reconsider their raison d&#8217;etre.</p>
<p>So it was with joy in my heart (I&#8217;m weird that way) that I happened across <a href="http://diffusionblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/see-this-is-future-of-television2-new.html">this piece</a> by Stephen Byrne of Diffusion, a company that advises on the value of brands.</p>
<p>After speaking frankly about the erosion in viewer numbers, Byrne suggests four new business models that might emerge:</p>
<p>Social Networking</p>
<p>Longtail</p>
<p>Contextual Programming, and</p>
<p>Branded Content</p>
<p><a href="http://diffusionblog.blogspot.com/2009/01/see-this-is-future-of-television2-new.html">Read the piece</a> for expansion on the points.</p>
<p>This fits snugly with some of the things I said about new business models in my 2007 book <a href="http://www.penguin.com.au/lookinside/spotlight.cfm?SBN=9780143007852">The Content Makers,</a> although I have often thought since the book was published that I should have said a lot more about Social Networking, which is clearly going to become one of the biggest determinants of what we choose to consume in media.</p>
<p>I have written more, since the book, about this <a href="http://www.creative.org.au/webboard/results.chtml?filename_num=200375">here</a>. And when I wrote that, I didn&#8217;t even know about Twitter.</p>
<p>Things move so fast.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Trevor Young <a href="http://www.prsa.org/supportfiles/news/viewNews.cfm?pNewsID=842347765">has interesting things to say</a> on social networking from a PR point of view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/contentmakers/2009/01/13/new-business-models-for-free-to-air-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
