For those who’ve been following the Croakey debate on the “healthy” rebranding of soft drinks, here’s an interesting story from the LA Times health blog following up the implications of health and medical organisations taking funding from soft drink companies and other vested interests.
It turns out the doctors aren’t the only ones taking Coca-Cola’s money. [...]
-
Pages
-
Categories
- adverse events
- alcohol
- Australian Medical Association
- cancer
- child health
- childbirth and maternity services
- chronic diseases
- climate change
- Cochrane Collaboration
- complementary medicines
- conflicts of interest
- consumer health information
- Crikey register of influence
- Croakey Register of Unreleased Documents
- dental care
- e-health
- education
- environmental health
- evidence-based issues
- Federal Budget 2009-2010
- Food
- general practice
- global health
- health & medical marketing
- health and medical education
- health and medical research
- health ethics
- health financing and costs
- Health inequalities
- health reform
- health regulation
- health workforce
- Hospitals
- HRT
- illicit drugs
- Indigenous education
- Indigenous health
- infectious diseases
- influenza
- international medical graduates
- Journal articles
- legal issues
- Media-related issues
- medical education
- men's health
- mental health
- NHMRC
- NT Intervention
- nurses and nursing
- obesity
- pathology
- pharmaceutical industry
- pharmacy
- physical activity
- poverty
- prevention
- primary health care
- private health insurance
- public health
- quality and safety of health care
- rural and remote health
- screening
- surgery
- swine flu
- tests
- TGA
- tobacco control
- trauma
- Uncategorized
- weight loss products
-
Archives