Questions are being asked about whether there is a pattern of inconsistency emerging. First we have evidence, as per the previous post, that the Government is planning something quite different for the National Preventive Health Agency than what the experts have recommended for it.
Now compare and contrast the following two statements – the first from [...]
-
Pages
-
Categories
- adverse events
- alcohol
- Australian Medical Association
- cancer
- child health
- childbirth and maternity services
- chronic diseases
- climate change
- Cochrane Collaboration
- complementary medicines
- conflicts of interest
- consumer health information
- Crikey register of influence
- Croakey Register of Unreleased Documents
- dental care
- e-health
- education
- environmental health
- evidence-based issues
- Federal Budget 2009-2010
- Food
- general practice
- global health
- health & medical marketing
- health and medical education
- health and medical research
- health ethics
- health financing and costs
- Health inequalities
- health reform
- health regulation
- health workforce
- Hospitals
- HRT
- illicit drugs
- Indigenous education
- Indigenous health
- infectious diseases
- influenza
- international medical graduates
- Journal articles
- legal issues
- Media-related issues
- medical education
- men's health
- mental health
- NHMRC
- NT Intervention
- nurses and nursing
- obesity
- pathology
- pharmaceutical industry
- pharmacy
- physical activity
- poverty
- prevention
- primary health care
- private health insurance
- public health
- quality and safety of health care
- rural and remote health
- screening
- surgery
- swine flu
- tests
- TGA
- tobacco control
- trauma
- Uncategorized
- weight loss products
-
Archives
