Prometheus: not-so-great Scott (plus, the Voice)
There will be those who go into the highly buzzed Prometheus, prequel to Alien, and come out well satisfied with a pretty good scifi flick (sub-genre: spaceships and aliens) with excellent special effects, a sinister, witty turn by Michael Fassbender as a robot and some sensational horror sequences.
Above: the ingenious and amusing promo clip which is not included in any way in the movie, so feel spoiler-free to enjoy; its brilliance proves Ridley Scott remains a hot ad man.
The Scott baggage
And then there will be those, like me, who go in with some trepidation, conscious that the director Ridley Scott has often not lived up to his best as the man behind four first-rate films: Alien, Blade Runner, Thelma and Louise, and Gladiator. Three of those had enough original inspiration to fire up entire trends (perhaps not T’n'L despite its startling premise and demise?). One great film is sufficient for legendary status, but Scott has somehow managed to bullseye four times without quite having the laurels bestowed upon him.
Alien infected every scifi horror movie after 1979 with its stagey silences and half-dark interiors, and the seminal, unsurpassed monster designs of H. R. Giger. Blade Runner, only three years later, is disputably the greatest science fiction film ever made (yes, yes, 2001), mashing a chase thriller with metaphysical themes. And a seminal, unsurpassed set design — future retro grunge is still the default setting of many scifi space flicks. And, and, its score by Vangelis that achieved a remarkable fusion of traditional moves with a convincingly speculative sound.
Reviewing Prometheus, New York magazine’s David Edelstein wonders if “Scott might be the most overrated director alive” which sounds harsh, but perhaps only in the way one speaks about an inconstant lover.
Portentous Prometheus
Which is why I found Prometheus somewhat disappointing. I was hoping for a lot, without really expecting the goods. We passed on the 3D, but it certainly looks and feels spectacular (though with some quantity of cheesiness — eg, a bit too much of the star spangled sense-of-wonder with David robot/Fassbender gazing raptly into a holographic Earth in space; eg, the gung-ho rebel yell scene near the end etc). Utterly gripping too are the horror moments — thoroughly frightening and gruesome with the most compelling extraction scene since Sacha Baron Cohen’s The Dictator.
The unconvincing bits are many: the implausibilities of plot points — with the crew splendidly unprepared or naive in the face of first contact — didn’t they read any of the NASA handbooks on what to do when meeting an alien race? — don’t touch them, don’t touch suspicious artefacts that look like unexploded bombshells leaking oily gunk, don’t touch anything! Half the ship’s staff seem quite naff, with most of them not invested with any reality; that is, they’ve been cast as alien fodder. The chronology is no really, too: on Earth in 2089; then light years away in another star system by 2094. No space or time is that relative.
The biggest letdown for me were the big questions it popped but declined to propose any answers for. Like Gauguin‘s painting, and indeed, Blade Runner‘s excellent efforts in this vein, Prometheus asks: “Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going?”
The movie opens with a mysterious ritual enacted in a ravishingly austere landscape over a waterfall (not CGI, but Iceland) that, in retrospect, seems about the beginning of life on Earth. And the Fassbender/robot poses the same questions as the replicant robots in Blade Runner — why are we here; who made us, etc — an echo of the questions asked by the scientist played by Noomi Rapace (artfully named ‘Lizbeth Shaw, an echo of her uncrushable Lisbeth Salander in Girl with the Dragon Tatoo; Shaw/Rapace acquits herself with great feminist credit). Naturally, then, the movie pits the religious (“I choose to believe”) scientist against the atheist robot. It feels pretty shallow, and reminds me of a remark that Scott’s work is marked by “a cold, sleek glamour” born of his TV advertising background (“[His] people tend to look pretty good even when they’re suffering horribly.”*).
+ + +
I was trying to keep it shortish, but felt obliged to add for clarity:
The crucial issue for me is one of tone. One may ignore the problems of timing** in the film, and dumb, no, stupid responses to evident danger, but if nothing else Scott is a great visual stylist, and in his best four, a stylish storyteller, his themes and morals embedded rather than explicit.
In Prometheus it’s pretty didactic: the know-it-all robot*** — who really does know what there is to know, and is fearless to boot; and the scientist who has placed her fate in faith — coming out to the stars to meet her (our) Maker; driven by the demons of her mother’s early death; and because of her own inability to have children. Of course, the rationality symbol that is David-robot also supposedly has no morals, or, feelings; the unreliable robot has been a scifi trope since the ’65 TV series Lost in Space, and propagated famously in Alien. Dr Shaw wears a cross; we see David-robot take the cross off her (“in case of contagion”!); later we see her put it back on. Much later, David-robot asks why she still needs to know the answers to the much-repeated questions she wants to ask her Makers. She says, point blank, because I’m human, and you’re not.
In contrast, right at the end of Blade Runner (first version), Deckard, a cop who extends extreme retirement to rogue replicant-robots, ponders in a voice over as he escapes with his replicant love interest,
I didn’t know how long we had together. But then, who does?
Moments earlier, a replicant expiring in the rain had declaimed,
I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe. Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion. I’ve watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
Only faintly purple, but sheer elegance in comparison. In 1982 Ridley Scott pierced with a needle; thirty years on it feels like he’s sawing with a steak knife.
+ + +
Anyway, Scott wants us to think — or, Scott wants us, or the critics, to think he is thinking a few steps ahead of us. Well, okay, why not, whatever. In any case, the movie is simply not as fresh or as original as one would have hoped, and as Scott has previously achieved (and for which we can always remain grateful). But if you want to be scared silly in a glamorous place where they can hear you scream****, head to your nearest multiplex.
Discussed on podcasts:
At : *Filmspotting
At: Parallax Podcast with Crikey’s Luke Buckmaster et al, episode #8
At: Slate Spoiler Specials (with lots of spoilage)
**Of all the places on the planet(moon) the ship “Prometheus” finds to land, it happens to be exactly where the alien artifacts are. And the crew go supermarket shopping within like fifteen minutes.
***Constant Gardener remarked, “the robot walks just like Sheldon Cooper (The Big Bang Theory).”
**** Alien‘s indelible slogan: “In space, no once can hear you scream.”
+ + +
Voice Choice
Yes, I know they had to pick Darren Percival and Karen Eden, and yes, as they told us and kept reminding us, they were all sick and buggy. And yes they were “pro, pro” professionals — and the show went on. But didn’t Diana Rouvas deliver the most stylish, pin-point turn of the night? The prize will go to the most distinctive voice, a battle between Our Darren and Our Karise, but in past episodes the judges/coaches had repeatedly hoisted the mantra, “Best on the Night.” But not, alas, last night. So, will it eventually be a boy, or a girl? Good luck, Diana, you were fab-u-lous. On the night.










Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.
Karise will win and her version of Hallelujah was kick ass.
By the way , have you checked out the famous Australian blues singer Renee Geyer yet?
Dear Marilyn,
Alas, I thought Karise’s “Hallelujah” was screechy, but as they explained, they all had the bug. She will probably win, an edge over the Darren P, hugely popular as he is. I haven’t updated my memory of Renee Geyer, fine singer that she is. Can’t say I rcall more than the well-known numbers — mostly the early stuff, “Stares and Whispers,” “Heading in the Right Direction,” the cute “Say I Love You” and “It’s a Man’s Man’s World,” which we know Karise picked for her blind audition.
And of course there was the anthem she famously sang for the Liberal Party in 1975, when Fraser booted Gough’s Labour out of government — “Turn on the Lights”: “Australia, you’ve been sleeping, brought down to your knees…Turn on the lights, Australia, it’s up to you and me. etc” Archival link.
No it was not screechy, everyone I know says it was awesome.
My theory on Prometheus kept me up very late. Spoiler Alerts ahead.
In the Greek legend Prometheus steals fire from the gods and gives it to the mortals. Only in this telling of the tale we are still the mortals but the Gods are extraterrestrial engineers. There are visual markings on the extraterrestrial planet surface similar to those at Nazca Peru and a generous nod to Erich von Daniken in the script.
The engineer at the beginning sacrifices himself in a religious ritual to kick start the evolution of life on a planet. The first engineer comes from a round space ship and the spaceships later discovered on the alien planet are C shaped indicating two different groups of engineers.
The ruins the crew of the Prometheus investigate contains the remains of several engineer bodies and a warehouse full of black goo. The bodies appear to have been the result of a black goo spill. The navigation display of the engineer’s ship has Earth as the next destination and the black goo as the cargo.
The crew later awaken an engineer and the engineer attacked the crew. The engineers are very aggressive. I think the engineer that awoke is just a soldier who awoke surrounded by his enemies from the planet he is about to attack. Maybe there is a parallel between the way the engineer views humans and the way humans view androids.
I also think the android David is sentient – he has favourite movies and wants to kill his creators (like the replicants from Blade Runner).
Feel free to disagree with me.
Fear that the Prometheus would be exactly as your review says it is has kept me from seeing it so far, and will probably keep me from seeing it till it comes on to Foxtel.
Just a couple of comments. First, you’ve got Gladiator in there as a top-rank film, but I personally thought it was just another sword and sandal effort with some annoying CGI effects. I certainly agree about Alien, Blade Runner and Thelma and Louise, though.
Second, you quote the line from the Blade Runner voiceover about not knowing how long they had as an example of better than average writing. Personally I prefer Gaff’s line, a little before, when he calls to Deckard, “It’s too bad she won’t live. But then again, who does?”
I agree about Blade Runner being disputably the best SF film of all. It’s got its flaws (especially the ending of the original version, which completely negated the basic premise of the entire film), but I think that in the Final Cut version he pretty much had got them sorted out. I still think that the opening sequence, where the camera floats over the vast, dark city and suddenly a flame erupts in the foreground, is about as arresting as these things get.
Dear Brizben,
I hadn’t replied cuz I was trying to finish and digest James Bradley’s comprehensive reading last night (at City of Tongues). He says it all, very well, and more. More, that is, than I think Prometheus really deserves.
The differentiation of ship shapes is a nice point: benign/circular; malignant/scythe-like. As for the rest, your theory sounds fine to me — though I think the whole thing is sufficiently incoherent, or, artfully “mysterious”, that any number of theories could fit as well.
David is certainly sentient: he is the classic AI — capable of consciousness; the dismissal of his .. what? … his humanity, his fullness as a lifeform, is that he has no soul. Dr Shaw says of her curiosity, her burning desire to know the answers, the desire that David lacks, as proof that she is human and he is not. He is not a “he,” only an it. I happen to think David is being wise, and Dr Shaw a tool of the filmmaker.
Dear Robin,
I think you should see it on the big screen — it’s looks great, and it’s scary in 3D if that’s your thing.
You’re right that Gladiator isn‘t as good as the other three– but it did start a trend, the sincerest compliment a film can receive. And it is a superior piece of work, certainly superior to much of Scott’s other films.
With the Blade Runner ending; the trick is that we’re dealing with two: the original, and the director’s cut — I’ve linked to the original above, and it’s pretty much the same line, six or half dozen. (The director’s cut version is more subtle, the original spells it out; I don’t think it does negate the premise, but don’t hold me to it.)
Ha, I threw that “disputably the greatest sf film” without thinking too much — I think it is pretty great. At the top, apart from 2001 — Empire Strikes Back; Clockwork Orange; Terminator; mm, Matrix?; er, Close Encounters?; … Donnie Darko?
I haven’t seen it yet but will based on a review but another well known critic who basically said that in 3D it was the most terrifying thing he’d seen (i.e. the alien effects). Based on this review I’d have otherwise waited for the blu-ray. As for Gladiator – those who think it’s just a swords & sandal flick have completely lost the plot. Everything about that film was perfection (apart from the CGI in gaded modern eyes). Bladerunner of course needs no further praise. T&L – meh apart from the unexpected ending.
Prometheus – A beautiful looking disappointment.
I think there are more than two versions. According to Wikipedia, there are at least 7, but there are three that have received wide release. The first (1983 or thereabouts) was condemned by many for having a voiceover, but I was knocked out by it, except for the inconsistent happy ending, as I said above. (The inconsistency is that the earth is supposed to be dying due to pollution and/or a nuclear war – that’s what’s killed all the animals so that the only animals or birds to be seen are artificial; and yet at the end the fly off into the sunset over endless miles of virgin forest.) The director’s cut (1991) got more praise from the critics, but I thought it lacked the energy and drive of the first, and I think it would have been difficult to follow if you didn’t know the plot already. Then we got the Final Cut in 2007, and that’s the one that I think is the best.
As for other top SF films, I agree with 2001, although the light show towards the end is a long bore and the final sequence is incomprehensible; also Terminator and Donnie Darko. Close Encounters I liked, and Matrix. I also thought Aliens II and Terminator II were every bit as good as their progenitors, although they are more action films than SF really. It’s a wide field though, if you want to go back as far as say Metropolis.
Ah, I see what you mean about negating the premise. We will stick with the 2007 cut, then.
I guess I never liked Metropolis that much, probably a period thing. As for the psychedelia sequence in 2001, I think the book was pretty muddled too — and that’s what happens when you’re reaching as far out as Kubrick and Clarke; neither of them are the most subtle of symbolists (but not everything has to be comprehensible, just kinda coherent). Blade Runner has the advantage of staying within limits. I’m tempted to pit them against Malick’s Tree of Life, on the slightly different playing field of Big Meaning rather than scifi.
Yep. I think Ridley is going to regret that over the next few years of fans constantly asking about it.
To anyone that is tossing up whether or not to see Prometheus I recommend seeing Prometheus in 3D.
Its probably a minor point in all this grand narrative stuff but characters and plot anyone? You go on a trillion dollar, 4 year, mission to an alien planet and your biologist dies trying to pat a snake? Has he met any animals in his training at all? Your geologist is freaked out but old dead stuff and seems to have some trauma from his days in a punk band. Your pilots have a death wish founded on nothing particularly substantial, which is usually a bad thing in pilots. Who are these people? I dont mean that in the cosmic sense of where did we come from but really, where the heck did they come from?
yes Altakoi, I was way too distracted at the scientists being so damn stupid.
Taking their helmets off after 1/2 hr on a new planet. Seriously?
Apparently in the future humans have completely forgotten about airborne viruses & contagions.
Science fiction writers need to have a least a basic understanding of science.
Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.