tip off
6

REVIEW: Fame | Capitol Theatre, Sydney

18-10-2010 3-03-57 PM

“Fame! I’m gonna live forever!” I think that’s how it goes. Only I’m not sure this musical should. I think it’s had its day. While, on paper, the themes are still topical, there’s something intangibly dated about it that can’t be overcome by sheer nostalgia. And the final indictment lies inasmuch as I think I enjoyed the pre-show ’80s classics piped through the PA as much as the show itself.

Pity. I was primed to enjoy. Which doesn’t mean, I don’t believe, my expectations were impossibly high. Like many people, my sum total knowledge of Fame, as a multimedia phenomenon, is the cinematic experience, on release, in 1980. As an excitable 20-year-old, the rebellious, self-determined tenacity and energy of the youths portrayed was inspiring. I’d just enough of the adolescent still in me to experience the spills, chills and thrills of their invigorated quests for identity and individuation. (Come to think of it, I still have.)

All the ingredients are pretty much in place. The set, while not a new wheel, functions well and looks the part of a grungy NYC school corridor. The wheel-in-and-out lockers and other props are spot-on. There’s the requisite Checker cab, in the finale (you have to wait all night for THE song, but you’re teased along the way); a large-format video backdrop; spectacular, state-of-the-art lighting (sometimes overdone, ironically, to a ’70s degree) by Trudy Dalgleish; superbly inventive musical arrangements by Dave Skelton, Daniel Edmonds and Sean Peter (‘though the keyboards are very heavy-handed, even by ’80s standards); reminiscent costume design by Janet Hine; punchy, athletic choreography, by director Kelley Abbey.

As well, there’s a great depth and diversity of fresh, young talent, bristling with healthily competitive urge. As with the original film, it’s conceived and developed by David de Silva, who sells it with almost Socratic eloquence in his programme notes. ‘To know oneself is a lifelong process. It helps us along the way if we recognise that life is theatre. There are many sides to the character we play in it. We’re always making our entrances and exits. Through the study and appreciation of the arts, we become better able to project our true selves, discover our uniqueness, design our space and channel our spirit. Thus, giving more meaning to our lives.’ Inspirational, no?

As is the real-life Fame school which inspired the Fame brand. Yes, brand. After all, Fame is now a bit like Toyota. Early on, there was a Corolla. Now there’s Camry. Kluger. You name it. Fame knows many media. One can’t help but feel, however, despite the creator’s fine words, Fame has become a bit of a default cashcow. it’s the poker-machine that gave at the box-office in 1980, and has given ever since.

Maybe it’s my fault, for having immediately preceded opening night with a new production of Wilde’s timeless The Importance Of Being Earnest. Perhaps that’s why Jose Fernandez’ book (except where he quotes the likes of Stanislavsky, or Whitman), especially in the first act, seems so lame, dull, lifeless and witless.

And not many of Jacques Levy and Steve Margoshes’ songs truly move, trouble or uplift (‘though there are notable exceptions, albeit very much ‘sold’ by quality of performance). In fact, that’s a large part of the problem, methinks. There’s a sense of cynical mimickry of musical structure: a romantic song here; a sad song there. it doesn’t ring true. I was seeing, but not really believing. Or feeling. Most of the time.

The big number wasn’t even written by them, but Dean Pitchford and Michael Gore. And, really, everything pivots around and anticipates that orgasm. Trouble is, there’s so much loosely-strung foreplay, I lost interest. So the moment I’d be waiting for seemed anti-climactic.

Veterans Andrew McFarlane (who gets a resident director credit, whatever that means) and Brain Wenzel, ironically, needed a firmer directorial hand. McFarlane’s drama teacher, Myers, particularly, was lacklustrous. Although his unco dancing at the end is almost worth the price of admission. Wenzel seemed miscast as the musically professorial Scheinkopf. The rest of the cast fell down, too, in the drama department, despite some redeeming moments of theatrical lucidity and, even, luminosity, from the likes of Broadway star Lillias White (as English mistress, Esther Sherman), Chris Durling (Nick Piazza), Kylie Fisher (Grace ‘Lambchops’ Lamb), Catherine Shepherd (Serena Katz), Rowena Vilar (Carmen Diaz), Sam Ludeman (Joe Vegas) and Rebecca Jackson Mendoza (Greta Bell).

Yes, you’re right: that’s quite a few cast-members. The frustrating and perplexing thing was the unevenness of dramatic performance, for the most part. It’s hard to laud any single individual for a throroughly convincing characterisation; ‘though ‘Lambchops’ may come close. Shepherd was also pretty solid. Vilar shone in her scene as the doomed, drug-addled streetwalker, especially when she broke into song. Tim Dashwood carried himself with appropriately geekish sensitivity, as the compassionate and sincere Schlomo Metzenbaum.

Singing and dancing was better, overall. This is a cast of great vocal individuality. And some of the dancing is quite exciting. Talia Fowler’s balletic Iris Kelly brought a kind of delicacy and sophistication to bear which wasn’t much evident otherwise. She’s the sort of dancer that could move you to tears.

Timomatic’s Tyrone Jackson showed how versatile this young man is: all-singing; all-dancing; the very quintessence of a streetwise, poppin’ brother. Dancin’ On The Sidewalk indulges Timomatic’s childhood adoration of Michael Jackson, in an unashamedly derivative, if enjoyable, number.

But it’s the opening of act two which is probably the most interesting, colourful, torrid and engaging excerpt amongt the up-tempo material: the so-called Argentine Tango, which is, broadly, a Latino take on the theme song, with some tasty flamenco flavour. Meanwhile, one of the best and most unassuming songs is Think Of Meryl Streep, sung by Serena.

Teachers Sherman and Bell have an argumentative sing-off, that threatens to tease a tingle around the nape of the neck: these girls could easily sustain a TKO against lesser competition, but each finds her match here. Their only rival is the gospel-blues belting of Josie Lane, in Mabel’s Prayer.

So, you see, there are moments, high points, yet, as a whole, it never seems to hit the mark. Perhaps because it seems too much a claculated pastiche, whereas, in Alan Parker’s original (film) it seemed we could see the blood, feel the sweat, cry the tears. Fame, The Musical, lacks that special something.

Curtain Call rating: B-

The details: Fame plays the Capitol Theatre in Sydney. New tickets went on sale through Ticketmaster today (October 18).

6

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    Willi
    Posted October 24, 2010 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    I saw “Fame” last night with my 19 year old daughter. A bit of a circle of life thingie I thought when I booked tickets as I was 19 when I saw the movie in 1980. I came away very disappointed.

    Not because of the singing, not because of the dancing. Not because of the sets and certainly not because of the quality of the performance. I’m sure we’ll be hearing a lot more from the younger cast in other productions, I couldn’t fault them and Lillias White as Miss Sherman was exceptional. In fact I would have paid just to hear her sing alone for two hours.

    However, call me naive, but for some reason I expected to hear familiar songs from the movie (and the old vinyl soundtrack album I still have). Classics like “Out here on my own”, “Hot lunch Jam”, “I sing the Body Electric” and to recognise the characters. The only one that came close was Brian Wenzel’s Mr Sheinkopf and honestly that was purely on looks alone. The character has about 3 lines in the entire show. Why was he even there?

    Only at the very end, after the lights went down and some people were beginning to walk out (we were in a box so I could see the stalls and dress circle) did the signature song “Fame” appear. It was fantastic, the theatre was pumping, and well worth the wait but why couldn’t we have more of that?

    You might criticise me (unfairly I think) for not embracing the new, after all, every song has to be a new song at first, but then why call it “Fame” and trade on the movie’s past popularity? I’m sure I’m not the only one who bought tickets based on the advertising which suggested (to me anyway) that this was going to be reminiscent of the movie. Some of the new songs were great and if the show had been called anything else I might actually remember them.

    As I said earlier, one cannot fault the performances or the choreography or in fact anything about the show. It was just not the show I expected to see.

  • 2
    Lloyd Bradford Syke
    Posted October 25, 2010 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    good question, willi. if you’re going to turn a 30-year-old movie into a pension fund, you might as well capitalise on all its strengths, you’d think. why its creator hasn’t beggars belief. you’re right about the young cast: I probably didn’t stress their performance and potential enough.and there are other robust production strengths, as you rightly point out. choreography. lillias. pity the writing and songs, for the most part, aren’t among them. maybe the show should be called shame.

  • 3
    Miss Boo
    Posted October 29, 2010 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    It is to do with the rights. There are no rights to use the original music other than 8 bars of the theme song. I also found this disappointing (being a hardcore ‘child of the 80′s!) when I saw the show in it’s first run, a few years ago, so much so, I felt cheated out of my hard earned cash, so I set about finding out why. The rights.

  • 4
    Willi
    Posted October 30, 2010 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Thanks Miss Boo, that makes perfect sense and also confirms to me Lloyd’s comment about the original movie being used as a perpetual cash cow. I’m amazed that they can still even call it “Fame” though I suppose the Producer(s) must own the rights to that part at least. I should have twigged that the logo was different but I wasn’t paying enough attention.

    As I said in my first comment, I thought the show itself was alright but it just wasn’t what I was expecting to see.

  • 5
    Lloyd Bradford Syke
    Posted November 8, 2010 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    ah, the rights! I should’ve known corporate lawyers, somewhere or other, would be using fame as a cash-cow of their own. moo-oo! but, in the end, who cares as to the whys and wherefores? why should the unsuspecting punter have to be on his or her guard and anticipate such machinations? on the contrary, perhaps the producers should be compelled to issue some kind of disclaimer.

  • 6
    autumn
    Posted November 29, 2010 at 1:07 am | Permalink

    watched fame tonight – it’s last performance in sydney. same as you guys, i am deeply disappointed. perhaps it was because of my anticipation and excitement to hear some of the original songs? well, yes…but it was more than that. the songs were just lame. normally after watching a nice play or musical (mainstream / popular or otherwise), there are lines or songs that stick in my head. well, nothing from this one.

    the solo acts (singing) were good. i do not understand though why there were more songs from a teacher than some of the students who didn’t even have a line. the male teachers’ presence was useless!

    there were some commendable voices – the english teacher, serena and nick. carmen was okay but was her opening note was flat (first impression lasts).

    i must say the choreography was good though esp the ‘carmen diaz’ number. tops! some delicate ballet moments but nothing that could move anyone to tears. there were so many dancers from ‘so you think you can dance’, nothing against the show (i’m actually a fan of that show), that i felt like it was more of amateur dance numbers. some of them were not even in the top 10!

    i feel disappointed, even cheated. when one advertises ‘the sound of music’, then it is expected to hear ‘the hills are alive’, ‘eidelweiss’, etc. they should not have called this ‘fame the musical’ but rather ADAPTATION to fame. the storyline is not even the same, the names of characters etc.

    well, this is australia and it’s a rip-off country. thanks to some company discount, i wasn’t fully ripped off. even so, i want my money back.

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...