Facebook Google Menu Linkedin lock Pinterest Search Twitter

Advertisement

Media

Nov 22, 2012

Killing Is Harmless: new avenues for videogame criticism

Brendan Keogh’s new book about Spec Ops: The Line marks an important moment for writing about videogames.

Share

Over the last few months I’ve seen an idea eating away at Brendan Keogh.

After playing Yager’s Spec Ops: The Line for the first time, he couldn’t stop talking about it. Brendan was writing about it before I had even finished the game, and before I knew it, he’d already written a significant amount—a significant amount. He said he had too much for any single website or magazine article. I could see it every time I spoke to him about it. He was excited.

And so Brendan wrote a book about Spec Ops: The Line. Most people would look at the world of videogames criticism and, failing to see a venue for publishing long-form criticism, wouldn’t think to write any in the first place. But it seemed like it couldn’t work any other way for Brendan. The fact that no-one (to my knowledge, anyway) had published a book of long-form videogame criticism before only vaguely seemed to register up until the moment the project was nearly upon him.

Killing Is Harmless: A Critical Reading of Spec Ops: The Line was released yesterday through Dan Purvis’ Stolen Projects label, and is selling for a couple of dollars. As much as I’d like to, I won’t publish a review of it as it’s never a good idea to review a friend’s work, but I’d like to gesture towards it in any case as an important moment in writing about videogames. It’s 169 pages of fluent, observant videogame criticism and narrative, written by the kind of person who’d throw together 50,000 words propelled only by the sheer romance for telling people about a great game.

Killing Is Harmless is available at Stolen Projects for $2.99

Daniel Golding —

Daniel Golding

Writer, PhD candidate and Game On blogger

Get a free trial to post comments
More from Daniel Golding

Advertisement

We recommend

From around the web

Powered by Taboola

4 comments

Leave a comment

4 thoughts on “Killing Is Harmless: new avenues for videogame criticism

  1. moonkid

    Will read. Will not play.

  2. Ruprecht

    Cheers Dan. Will play when I get a chance later in the year, then read.

    I’m curious to see how long-form VG crit goes.

  3. Daniel Golding

    The book takes a fairly linear approach, following the game from start to finish. So either you’ll want to have played the game beforehand, or be happy being spoiled. I’m told it works fine if you haven’t played the game, but you’d definitely be spoiled.

  4. Ruprecht

    Should I play the game before I read the book, or will it have spoiler tags?

Leave a comment