Breeny explains the Hanson confusion

Meet “Breeny” editor of the Sunday Telegraph. We now learn that he has considerable doubts about the authenticity of the “Hanson” photos, although the “real story” now is who were they? Yeah Breeny, that’s the real story.

As for the orginal splash of “Pauline”, well “we needed to put more rigours through it”.

Maybe so. Watch and learn:

YouTube Preview Image

3 Comments

  1. Spam Box
    Posted March 20, 2009 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    Yeah I’d say your right about that mate, the “your an idiot” bit

  2. paddy
    Posted March 21, 2009 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Stop being a wimp Jonathan. If you can find a decades old picture that looks like a fishwife with red hair….. Clearly you should publish it. (In the pubic interest of course.)
    Sheesh…who have thunk it. Defending pants down Pauline, because she was being pursued by an entity even worse than she.

    Could there be a more delicious catastrophe, than the fall of the house of Murdoch?

  3. Venise Alstergren
    Posted March 22, 2009 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Paddy: Well said.

    I just hope Rupert lives long enough to see his loathesome junk-heaps, euphemistically called newspapers collapse. And that he understands what happens to people enjoy the paths of whores. All of the power and none of the responsibility.

Post a Comment

Register now to join the conversation instantly, or log in to post a comment now.