<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Teling peple howe too spellr rite&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/07/09/teling-peple-howe-too-spellr-rite/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/07/09/teling-peple-howe-too-spellr-rite/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:11:15 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Down and Out of Sài Gòn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/07/09/teling-peple-howe-too-spellr-rite/comment-page-1/#comment-407</link>
		<dc:creator>Down and Out of Sài Gòn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/?p=1510#comment-407</guid>
		<description>I see I just wrote &quot;their us&quot; instead of &quot;their use&quot;. Would their software have caught the error?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see I just wrote &#8220;their us&#8221; instead of &#8220;their use&#8221;. Would their software have caught the error?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Down and Out of Sài Gòn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/2009/07/09/teling-peple-howe-too-spellr-rite/comment-page-1/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator>Down and Out of Sài Gòn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 05:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/northern/?p=1510#comment-406</guid>
		<description>The spellr.us folk may be spelling pedants, but their us of grammar leaves me uneasy. Take this sentence from their front page: &quot;9/10 websites have spelling errors&quot;. It took me a couple of seconds to comprehend what they were trying to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spellr.us folk may be spelling pedants, but their us of grammar leaves me uneasy. Take this sentence from their front page: &#8220;9/10 websites have spelling errors&#8221;. It took me a couple of seconds to comprehend what they were trying to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
