tip off
9

Shitbox Rally = Clowns, Bulldust and Dickheads on the NT’s Stuart Highway

These past few days I had the very dubious pleasure of sharing a 600 kilometre or-so stretch of the Stuart Highway – from the Hi-way Inn near Daly Waters through to Darwin – with some of those participating in the second annual Shitbox Rally.

The Shitbox Rally is most likely a good idea – a sort of Variety Bash for the kids. Last year they drove from Sydney to Alice Springs and got a lot of support from the ABC’s JJJ radio. This year the route was from Brisbane to Darwin.

It is pretty simple really – you buy an old banger for a grand and drive across the country raising money for the Cancer Council as you go. Last year they raised a fairly modest $104,000. So far this year they’ve topped that big-time and raised at least $644,000.

All well and good so far – a bunch of yoof – the participants are overwhelmingly Gen-Y – get in a bunch of old bangers, drive across the country and have more than a few drinks and some serious fun on the way and raise some valued dosh for much-needed cancer research, prevention and support.

The terms and conditions for participation are pretty complex and include this formula for fundraising:

Entry to the Shitbox Rally is at least $4,250 (can increase depending on the number of participants in each team due to the $250 registration fee per person). Each participant agrees that this will be distributed as follows,

• Up to 58.5% of the initial $4,000 is used to cover event organising costs (including $1,000 for the car and $500 for fuel) with the remaining going to Cancer Council.

• For all funds raised over $4,000 the Cancer Council receives at least 66.5% of funds raised.

• The percentages going to Cancer Council may increase if the full $1,000 for the car is not needed and/or the car sells in the auction which adds to the total funds raised for the team and other budgeted costs can be reduced or avoided. The percentage that is donated to Cancer Council is based on the minimum fundraising goals and maximum budgeted costs.

I’m a little curious about how much of the money raised will actually get to the Cancer Council – almost 60% of the entry fee goes to the organisers and an uncertain amount of all money raised above $4,000 – the Cancer Council receives “at least 66.5%” above that amount – goes to “budgeted costs“.

I note that a search for “Shitbox Rally” at the Cancer Council website comes up with “You searched on “shitbox rally“. 0 results found.

Who the organisers are is less than clear from the Shitbox Rally website. Icon International Communications, a public relations company with “wholly owned” (whatever that means) offices in Sydney and Singapore is apparently heavily involved.

Icon says that it:

…has been on board with the Shitbox Rally since the beginning after one of its British employees, Clare Waller, decided to brave the Australian outback and register for the inaugural 2010 Shitbox Rally. Clare was incredibly passionate about the great cause, and decided to bring ICON on board on a pro bono basis to help with media relations for the Rally. ICON secured almost 150 articles, broadcasts and online mentions which reached over 17 million people. Most importantly, the increased interest further drove Shitbox’s fundraising efforts to surpass their original target by 500%, rising over $100,000!

There also appears to be a body (I’m unsure if it is a charity, a proprietary-limited company or what) called The Shitbox Rally, to whom, along with Icon and the Cancer Council, entrants will:

“…assign…the right to the videotape and sound recordings made of me during, before and after the Shitbox Rally.You hereby authorise the reproduction, sale, copyright, exhibition, broadcast and/or distribution of said photography, videotape, DVD or electronic files without limitation. You agree that you may use any or all of my name, voice, likeness, acts and statements for the video footage of said rally; as well as my name and likeness for advertising and promotion purposes in connection with said event; and the sponsors there of these rights include the duplication and/or broadcast for public relations, editorial, news and all other purposes.”

That – and the sweeping indemnities given to the Shitbox Rally organisers by all entrants – are fairly standard fare in this sort of lark these days.

I don’t really care too much about these matters – they just caught my attention – but I’d welcome any further insights you may have into these arrangements.

I’m also curious about how many of the entrants actually read the fine print…

Enough of all that – what I really want to look at here is the conduct of a few – certainly not all – of the participants that I saw over the past few days, particularly along the stretch of the Stuart Highway between Darwin and the Hi-way Inn at Daly Waters 300 or so km’s south of Katherine.

I’d been out at Borroloola in the Gulf Country for a few days for work and drove the 380 km’s of the Carpentaria Highway back to the Stuart Highway on Thursday. I stopped at the Hi-Way Inn near Daly Waters for fuel, a pie, a coffee, a slash and a look around and then turned my wheels north to Katherine.

Soon after I left the Hi-Way Inn I was overtaken by a small, dusty sedan rocking along at speed on skinny tires trailing a cloud of blue smoke. This was a car designed for the city streets, not the open road. I cruise at or about the maximum speed on the Stuart Highway of 130 km/hr and this wreck on four wheels overtook me doing at least 150 km/hr.

About 40 or so km’s up the road I saw a dusty old sedan parked in the turnoff to Maryfield Station. Funny, I thought, doesn’t look like a station car. And it wasn’t. I was following two of the Shitbox Rally cars and as we approached the turnoff the sedan suddenly turned onto the highway right in a cloud of wheel-spinning bulldust right in front of the two cars I was tailing – causing them – and me to brake suddenly.

Maybe they all thought it was funny – I certainly didn’t.

By now my bullshit detector was on full alert.

I pulled out and passed these clowns and put as much distance between me and them as I could. According to the Shitbox Rally organisers “it isn’t a race“, but from what I saw over two days last week some of the contestants thought that the Stuart Highway was their own personal dragstrip.

By the time I got to Mataranka there were quite a few Shitboxes on the road. For those that haven’t driven the 100 or so km’s from Mataranka to Katherine – a run I’ve done hundreds of times – it can be a very deceptive piece of highway. A few long straights, a narrow, rough and patchy road surface and several long sweeping bends make it a stretch of road to be taken cautiously at the best of times.

Throw in – as on this past Thursday – a setting sun drilling straight through your bug-encrusted windscreen, more than a few triple-trailer road-trains and the plague-locust army of caravans – travelling at 80 km/h and less – that infest the Stuart Highway at this time of year and it can be a positively dangerous stretch. Particularly for those – most of the Shitboxers – that have never driven the road before.

Seeing several Shitboxers drag-racing up the road at speeds well in excess of the maximum speed limit was less than exciting. Perhaps more by luck than good driving they all seem to have made it to Katherine.

After over-nighting in Katherine I drove the last 300 km leg home from Katherine to Darwin the next day.

Again this is a stretch of road I know well and have travelled hundreds of times over the years and which I accord every respect. It can be a challenging piece of road at the best of times – and last Friday was far from the best of times. Record rains during this past wet season caused a lot of damage to the pavement in many places and the road crews are out in force fixing it. And by mid-morning the traffic on the highway is chockers…passenger cars, road-trains, caravans and…Shitboxers.

The Shitboxers kept up the same antics I’d seen the day before all the way to Darwin.

And it seems that the race – because that is what it seems to be by now – to get to Darwin had more than a few participants confused about simple matters like navigation. They were supposed to turn north-east off the Stuart Highway at Pine Creek up the Kakadu Highway to the small mining/tourist town of Jabiru and then loop back to Darwin- but as far as 60 or so km’s further up the Stuart Highway I saw Shitboxers back-tracking south.

Shitboxers – can’t drive, can’t navigate…don’t come back here…

9

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    Just Me
    Posted May 29, 2011 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Seems like some organisers have conveniently short memories.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuart_Highway#Cannonball_Run

    All I got to say.

  • 2
    yurgen
    Posted May 29, 2011 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    You sound like a whinger.

    I was on the rally and I can tell you now that it wasn’t a race.

    There were quite a few young people, and with that comes stupid behaviour. They were also mainly Sydney residents that have never been outside the city.

    The organisers did quite a good job considering the amount of people involved and the main age group. We were told at every morning briefing it wasn’t a race. There were no prizes or rankings so what were we actually racing for? We were also advised on road conditions and how we should be driving to suit. How can an organiser do any more than that.

    As for the cars themselves, by the time they reached the Stuart Highway, any faults or problems would have been well and truly found. These cars made it through some pretty harsh dirt roads and creek crossings. Out of the 109 cars that started only 7 failed to make the distance. The condition of them wasn’t as bad as they looked. Most were painted up to look as rough as possible. They were all registered so they had every right to be on the highway. The majority of these drivers and cars were RBTed and vehicle inspected twice during this trip. I didn’t hear of anyone being done for being unlicenced or driving under the influence.

    If you want to complain about vehicle standards and drivers, why not have a look to our local indigenous folk. How many of their cars do you see unroadworthy, being driven by unlicenced and under the influence drivers? I am certain it would be a lot higher than the shitbox brigade.

    I see just as many caravaners and tourists here every day that display stupid and dangerous behaviour. You choose to pick on Gen Y. I am no fan of the majority of the Gen Y crowd but for you to label all the entrants in this rally with the “can’t drive and can’t navigate” shows how narrow minded you really are.

    You only saw a small part of the whole rally. You have formed your naive opinion based on that. You obviously aren’t as smart and as educated as you think you are so you should just crawl back under your rock.

    For the commenter “just me”, this was nothing like the cannonball run. That is all I have to say on your useless comment.

    It is good to see there are still idiots in this world that don’t let the truth get in the way of a good story.

    If you feel you need to complain and bitch then how about doing a bit more research into what you are actually attacking.

  • 3
    Captain Planet
    Posted May 30, 2011 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    Sorry Bob, you’re coming across as a grumpy old man.

    Perhaps more by luck than good driving they all seem to have made it to Katherine.

    Leaving your value judgement aside, the facts speak for themselves. They all made it to Katherine.

    A line I heard from a co – worker when we were in the Western Desert about 10 years back….. (He’d been harassed by the mining company thought police for driving “dangerously”)….

    (spoken with Russian Accent)
    “How can it be unsafe? I did not crash.”

    The proof of the safety of any action is in the consequences. Every one of more than 100 cars made it to Katherine, and not one crash? Seems like they were driving pretty safely to me. They made it their safely, after all.

  • 4
    grumbles96
    Posted May 30, 2011 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Again bob, I have to disagree.

    I was on the rally, and was on it last year as well.

    In 2010 the rally had 17 teams, and was a relatively small affair. There were no issues on the rally, no-one complained, we were a tight knit group and controllable. So the “small” amount of $104000 was a big effort between roughly 38 people and should be applauded.

    This year there were 109 teams, and roughly 250 participants. Naturally, when going from 17 cars to 109, there are always going to be some minor issues. And in this case, there have been a couple of cars that did the wrong thing, and you are judging the entire convoy on them. And don’t worry, we know which cars they are, and as a group we have all expressed our disgust at their driving antics, and you can guarantee they wont be on the rally next year.

    But you could try commending those that did the right thing, stayed in convoy, drove to their cars limits even if it meant driving 20km/hr UNDER the legal speed limit. Those that as a convoy, grouped together to make overtaking easy for local cars, and stayed on CB’s to make sure that everyone behind knew the road conditions ahead, and whether it was safe to pass roadtrains and caravans.

    I understand your disgust at those doing the wrong thing, and we have all shared the same feelings about them, as they have now tainted what we set out to achieve, but this is not the way to voice it. Over $680,000 was raised for cancer council, the majority of the cars did the right things, and we put our cars and bodies through a very tough week to raise awareness and funds for cancer.

    I’m disappointed in this post, because I don’t see any other blogs you’ve made about local idiotic drivers, you’ve just chosen to pick on a group that’s set out to do good things with good intentions. Shame on you.

  • 5
    Captain Planet
    Posted May 30, 2011 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Many of my fellow central desert dwellers are a parochial lot. This article was more motivated by a “they’re not from around here” localist mentality, than it is about condemning poor driving habits.

  • 6
    Ruth Nocka
    Posted May 30, 2011 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    So you’ve seen a couple of people driving like hoons on a rally and decide to write a post calling into question the motives of the organisers and besmirching the reputations of all of those involved. Well done Bob. It seems that the only clown in this blog is the one writing it.
    Had you bothered to conduct even the most basic research you would have discovered that the Cancer Council is in fact 100 per cent behind the event and the happy beneficary of the vast majority of funds raised. The CEO of the Cancer Council NSW spoke at the commencement of the rally this year.
    Proper research would also have identified that the rally is organised by James Freeman who is present on the rally and available throughout the lead up to the rally to answer any questions and concerns participants have. James started the rally as a way to raise money for the Cancer Council after losing both of his parents to cancer. Hardly the kind of shady operation you have painted in your blog.
    As to your statement that 60 per cent of the entry fee going to the organisers, this is again an error. It should be perfectly clear from the terms and conditions quoted that $1,500 goes back to the participants to purchase their cars and fuel.
    What you completely overlook in this unfair and miserable blog is that a lot of people expend considerable time and effort to raise funds and participate in the rally. Most people do it in memory of a person dear to them lost to cancer. It’s a rally that brings a lot of people to the Outback who would never notmally have made such a trip. And most people participate in the way the organisers encourage them to – with a spirit of adventure, the willingness to help each other out and to have a good laugh. Given all of this, it’s a shame then that you can only think to insult those involved.

  • 7
    James Freeman
    Posted May 31, 2011 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Bob,

    As Rally Founder and Director I want to pass on my disappointment after reading your blog following what has been an incredibly successful second Shitbox Rally. I am particularly disappointed to read the behaviour of a small minority has tainted your whole impression of the rally.

    I have been trying to personally call you to clarify a few points in response to your blog however I’ve been unable to get through. In the meantime I’ll respond online here.

    I founded the Shitbox Rally in 2010 after I lost both my parents within thirteen months and my brother a few years earlier all to cancer. My initial plan was to pull together a few friends and raise $20,000 for Cancer Council while discovering the roads less travelled in our beautiful country. Little did I know how passionate people would become about this cause. Cancer has touched almost every one of us in some way. In our first year seventeen teams raised over $104,000 – I would say that was more than a ‘fairly modest’ effort in our first year.

    The success of our first rally drove great interest in our 2011 rally and before we knew it we had over 100 teams registered. A majority of the teams were Gen X however the great thing about Shitbox is it allows anyone to get involved. You don’t need a $60,000 rally car and thousands of dollars for registration. Your average Joe Blow will drive alongside a millionaire. The rally is the reward for all the hard work teams put into raising funds for cancer research while further driving awareness.

    The ‘body’ you mention, Shitbox Rally, is purely a one-man show – me! It is not a registered charity however ALL profits go to the Cancer Council to assist in critical cancer research. There are certain operational costs which we budget for however we never lose sight of the whole reason behind the rally: to drive awareness of Cancer and raise much-needed funds for cancer research. We therefore rely on the support of many volunteers to ensure the success of the rally.

    As part of this we therefore recognised the need to bring communication experts on board to assist in all media activities as this is not my speciality. We brought ICON International Communications on board in 2010 to assist us in promoting the rally to further drive fundraising efforts as well as interest in participating in coming years. ICON does not receive any funds for their hard work – they work on a completely pro bono basis.

    Cancer Council is 100% behind the rally. Following the success of the inaugural rally I received a personal phone call from the CEO, Andrew Penman, to congratulate us. We are now the second largest personal fundraising initiative for Cancer Council – something we’re very proud of. Andrew is so supportive of our work he came to speak to the 2011 participants and see us off in Brisbane.

    I work hard to ensure I brief all participants at the start of each day as well as providing a detailed manual for the entire rally. We cover routes, road conditions and mechanical/vehicle recommendations (e.g. letting down tyres on gravel/dirt roads) however I’m not too proud to admit I’m still learning. There will be many lessons from this year’s rally which I’ll take on board in 2012 to ensure the success going forward. The conduct of a small minority of participants on this year’s rally was very disappointing however please be assured I took all necessary actions at the time, and I will ensure mechanisms are in place to ensure Shitbox is known for all the right reasons.

    In 2012 we won’t be travelling through the Northern Territory however we would welcome you to get involved. You only need to read some of the other comments posted by previous participants to realise the real Shitbox Rally is completely different to the one you describe above. I hope you now have a greater understanding.

    Cheers,

    James Freeman

  • 8
    Ben
    Posted June 4, 2011 at 9:18 am | Permalink

    Some excellent comments here, definitely leaving me with the impression that the original post give a very biased view of what seems to be a good cause.

    However, one comment stated, “the proof of the safety of any action is in the consequences”. That approach to safety is commonly known as ‘luck’, and I know I’ve foolishly done many unsafe things that I got away with and learned from.

  • 9
    Peter Adams
    Posted June 8, 2011 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    Bob,

    Like the other commenters Ruth and Yurgen I was lucky enough to be involved in the Shitbox Rally this year. Errors in judgement can take many forms, Bob. For some it could mean that they take undue risks when driving on outback roads. For others it means they write ill informed, mean spirited blog posts about truly unique and important event like the Shitbox Rally.

    It is entirely understandable that the addition of more than 100 cars to outback highway may cause other users some inconvenience. Similarly, it would be reasonable to think than in any group of 200 drivers there many be some who do not share your keen interest in road safety. However, the overwhelming majority of those involved took every possible step to ensure the safety of themselves and of those around them. I know from first hand experience how seriously James and his team of volunteers take the safety of not only those participating on the Rally but of the general public.

    James Freeman, ICON International and all of those involved with the Shitbox Rally should be celebrated not torn down because some participants caused you what can only be described a minor inconvenience. Not only was in excess of $680,000 raised for important cancer research but more than 200 people were lucky enough to see the beauty and meet the characters of the Northern Territory – something that any true Territorian would support.

    I, for one, hope you take up James’ gracious offer of participating in the event in 2012 so you too can share in the experience – it might give you something positive to write about.

    Yours,

    Peter Adams

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



Womens Agenda

loading...

Leading Company

loading...

Smart Company

loading...

StartupSmart

loading...

Property Observer

loading...