Air New Zealand’s long haul review, its Virgin Australia interests and US routes

   

Air New Zealand’s pledge last week to review its long haul business and look at ‘alliance partner opportunities’ is an invitation to consider its minority equity in trans Tasman alliance partner Virgin Australia and the realignments taking place on the trans Pacific routes to the US.

Virgin Australia has a strong joint venture agreement with Delta Airlines, and Air New Zealand, as a Star Alliance carrier, relies to an extent on connections onto the United Airlines US network.

These respective US partners also have airliners in use or on order that could shake up the routes linking their networks to Virgin Australia and Air NZ.

Delta has Boeing 777-200LRs that could viably operate Sydney to Atlanta services non-stop (14,942 kilometres) with some payload/route issues to Australia because of an ETOPS unfriendly area between Tahiti and Mexico.

And United intends to inaugurate Boeing 787-8 services on the Houston-Auckland route (11,933 kilometres) as soon as it can introduce the Dreamliners originally ordered by Continental pre-merger with UA, which we hope means sometime before the end of 2012.

Atlanta’s Hartsfield-Jackson Airport is the world’s busiest by passengers and schedules, and intensively connected to the eastern cities of the continental US and Canada.

Houston is by location and United connections, a natural competitor to the American Airlines hub at Dallas Fort Worth that taxes the payload capabilities of the four times weekly but diversion prone Qantas 747-400ER services.

However, as a number of commentators have pointed out, that Qantas service could avoid those difficulties if it operated via Auckland, rather than fly back to Sydney via Brisbane, and sometimes Nadi or Noumea when headwinds or the closure of alternate airports forces a diversion like that of QF8 on Sunday.

Air New Zealand is also the launch customer for the Boeing 787-9, the second version of the Dreamliner, which Boeing says will carry more payload further than -8 version that United is proposing to operate between Houston and Auckland.

The NZ carrier has been told it will get its first 787-9 at the end of 2013 and its guidance is that it expects them in 2014, accompanied by a little bit of friction between itself and Boeing over repeated delays to the Dreamliner project, which received type certification last week and will see the first 787-8 delivered to All Nippon Airways by the end of this September.

Qantas also has 787-8s and -9s on order, however the -8s, apparently delayed until 2013, are for Jetstar, and the -9s, which have trans Pacific capabilities, are due sometime in 2014 or 2015.

This means that in terms of long haul lift Virgin Blue’s partner Delta, and Air New Zealand’s Star Alliance partner United have the drop on Qantas in terms of existing and pending airliners that can make hubs in Texas and further east work a lot better than its aging 747-400ERs can for between 3-4 years before it can respond with 787-9s.

Meanwhile both Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand have Boeing 777-300ERs in service to Los Angeles and provided they don’t need as many seats per flight as Qantas offers in its A380s, they give them highly efficient lift.

Qantas, Virgin Australia and Air New Zealand would all be looking at the cards each hold in terms of lift using their own or alliance partner airliners, and no doubt asking how they could be played at Houston, Dallas Fort Worth and Atlanta in order to gain a competitive advantage in the deep south and east of the continental US market.

And not just in terms of the next five years. Trans Pacific growth expectations while less than those for Asia mean that 787s and existing 777s may not be large enough to cope by the end of this decade, (especially so at SYD and LAX)  which in turn means that Boeing’s preliminary soundings about a 777-X, and Airbus indications of changes to its comparably sized A350-1000 project, and A380s with much more range or payload, all start to assume importance as the 2020s approach.

5 Comments

  1. 1
    Peteyboy
    Posted August 30, 2011 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    I would have thought anyone’s tie up with United would involve Denver somehow. Outstanding airport, massive investment by United there already and SYD-DEN is slightly closer than Houston. Virgin or Air New Zealand would have to fly the long stage themselves unless they’re happy with just the leisure/bucketshop market out of Australia.

    The ideal would be Virgin flying the long stage length to Denver, followed by United domestic connections from there: something infinitely more attractive to a business traveller than a long flight on either United or Delta. This arrangement could be a real threat to Qantas’s effective monopoly on high quality business class travel to the US.

  2. 2
    fabio1
    Posted August 31, 2011 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    ” Qantas service could avoid those difficulties if it operated via Auckland”

    But they would have to change to NZ based Jetconnect crew for the leg too and from Sydney

  3. 3
    Robin Johnson
    Posted August 31, 2011 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    I would expect V Australia to use San Francisco, now conveniently abandoned by Qantas, so as to link with Virgin America’s growing hub.

  4. 4
    ghostwhowalksnz
    Posted September 1, 2011 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Continental/United flying Auckland Houston doesnt make any marketing sense. US airlines dropped out of the NZ – US market years ago and dont have any local selling network. Unless of course the flight was to carry on to Sydney or Melbourne. Could be the real reason Qantas has hastily fallen in love with Dallas. Sydney Auckland Houston makes much more economic sense.

  5. 5
    Posted September 12, 2011 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    ...] from Qantas on the trans-Tasman route, and could even enable it take some business from Qantas on those long haul flights to and from the US. Judging by recent share prices, the government can expect to raise about $300 million from selling [...

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.