Jetstar shrinks A330 services a year out from its first 787s
The countdown is on for Jetstar to take a sizable fleet of 787s, but unanswered questions persist, and not all of its wide-body routes appear to be thriving.
It is now about a year, according to Qantas guidance to date, to the delivery to Jetstar of the first of 15 Boeing 787-8 Dreamliners fitted out with 313 high density seats, including a small premium economy cabin marketed as business class.
But something doesn’t seem right. Trawling through the Jetstar timetables, as one does, it is difficult to see where that many Dreamliners are going to fly for Jetstar if background information remains valid, in that the 787-8s will be based in Singapore, and replace Airbus A330-200s currently being flown to a limited number of destinations, as well as expand those wide-body operations.
This isn’t to say that Jetstar isn’t sitting on a brilliant expansionary plan waiting to blind side us all with its genius. Qantas shareholders and Jetstar staff will be be no doubt hoping this is very much the case.
The not-quite-right bit involves services between Singapore and Beijing and Singapore-Auckland which were respectively supposed to be five or seven times weekly according to pre-launch hype.
But the timetable shows that Singapore-Beijing has shrunk from five weekly to four weekly services, and Singapore-Auckland is down to three times weekly. Jetstar’s international services also use the A332 between Melbourne and Singapore daily, and frequently between Australia and Honolulu and Australia and Japan.
However the timetable doesn’t show where 15 Dreamliners would go. And shrinking Singapore-Beijing and Singapore-Auckland definitely wasn’t on the song sheets when those services were launched.
What several sources have said for some time now is the 787-8 isn’t going to operate non-stop between Singapore and anywhere in Europe, nor non-stop between Australia and the US west coast cities such as San Francisco (abandoned by Qantas) or Los Angeles. So where are they going to go?
For all the hype about Jetstar International, its wide-body efforts between Australia and Asia excluding Japan have produced less customer capacity than its direct low-cost wide-body rivals, Singapore Airlines’ subsidiary Scoot with 402 passenger refurbished 777-200ERs to Singapore from Sydney and the Gold Coast and AirAsiaX’s even more tightly crammed 377 seat Airbus A330-300s from the Gold Coast, Sydney, Melbourne and Perth to Kuala Lumpur.
This comparison excludes Japan in order to look at routes where the three wide-body low cost rivals actually compete, which is to SE Asia hubs, and its excludes what is mainly single aisle lift to other ports, because the question is where will the Dreamliners fit in for Jetstar.
Jetstar could deploy them more on its Thailand and Indonesia services. Bali is growing at a rate where single aisle capacity will cease to be adequate or competitive within the medium term, although more activity on those services by Indonesian carriers is more than likely.
Jetstar could also replace A320s on most of its flights to NZ with 787s, but it would expose it to excess capacity, particularly from approval pending Qantas partner, Emirates, which flies multiple A380s and 777-300ERs on routes to Auckland and Christchurch.
It is not surprising that the stories about the 787-8s going to Qantas to replace its aging domestic 767s persist, despite Qantas denials, and in the face of a complete cabin remake for these old but comfortable Boeings.
An explanation of the Jetstar 787 strategy might be given at the Qantas annual general meeting on 2 November, which could prove very interesting for an even wider range of reasons.












Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.
I believe they were looking at Japan for their 787′s.
Will this mean that some A330′s will be ‘returning home’ to Qantas early, prior to the Jetstar introduction of the B787-8?
Any chance of an update as to how 787s are performing in the field ??
Are Boeing getting them out of the factory now in a timely fashion ?
There is a report here with some further discussion in the comments.
http://blogs.crikey.com.au/planetalking/2012/10/10/airbus-old-tech-a330-keeps-out-selling-boeing-new-tech-787/
If QF is to refocus properly on Asia to the extent their hype is foreshadowing, then they desperately need some of JQ’s 332s to come back for international duty. Recent new schedule announcements for SYD/MEL-SGP services are just placeholders given ACCC approval strategy change and fact IATA slots conference is yet to occur. More changes are certain to come. Surely no one believes old 744s will be the backbone of QF’s Asia refocus? They’ll need more international capacity in Q2/3 2013. 788s won’t be delivered in sufficient time or quantity, so it’ll have to be JQ 332s.
That said, 788s – say first 8 – will go to QF Domestic to be a powerful point of difference in the war against VA. JQ Intl will keep a smaller number of 332s out of SGP for time being. Around 2015, why not give 6-8 788s to JQ Hong Kong and/or JQ Japan? By then, both will have their A320 ops steadily going. Give those guys 788s for flights in/out QLD to CHN (outside of Beijing & Shanghai) and JPN? JQ Pacific shouldn’t be discounted either for 788s to run a direct AUS-Ho Chi Minh service.
Watch for a big fleet announcement at the upcoming AGM in early Nov. Rumours are already rife about a new B737 order to replace 734s, add more capacity and likely cover replacement options for early purchase 738s. QF will have to show its hand on 788s sooner rather than later. A JQ 332 announcement shift then will allow them to be withdrawn post-Xmas holiday period for QF Intl refit to start ops on 1 April 2013. And maybe with an updated A330 intl cabin?
I think there is a lot of common sense and ‘necessity’ behind such scenarios, which are breaking out like the spring blossoms where I usually live.
One thing that does however worry many observers of major carriers around the world at the moment is the risk that finance is going to disappear. If this happens, those that have taken their opportunities at the right times in the past, and those that made excuses for inaction, are going to experience seriously different outcomes. The difference between dominant and subordinate business partners will in some cases become acutely obvious.
Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.