Singapore Airlines fleet changes target the ‘Emiroo’
What does Singapore Airlines get with $8 billion in new Airbuses? The flying kangaroo trapped in a spotlight, and kudos from Singapore’s business elite for enhancing Changi’s chances in its fight with the Emirates hub at Dubai.
This editorial appears in the Crikey Daily Mail today
Singapore Airlines launched a massive attack on Qantas and its approval pending Emiroo partnership with Emirates overnight, ordering close to $8 billion worth of extra Airbus A380s and A350s in what is as much about the pressure it is under to keep Changi Airport a major facilitator of economic activity as it is about airline competition.
The concerns in Singapore’s business and government elites about the recent Qantas decision to drop Changi for the Emirates hub at Dubai for its flights to Europe and the UK elevated the disquiet that has been building in Singapore for years over the UAE city’s imitation of Singapore’s success in making itself a cross roads and focal point for shipping, manufacturing and financial services as well as what travellers see as one of the great connecting airports of the world.
That disquiet also ‘wedged’ Singapore Airlines over its slow recognition of the importance of low cost airline franchises, and its remorselessly declining role in bringing business to Changi airport compared to the contributions of the Qantas Jetstar franchise, leading last year to its investment in a long haul wide body low cost brand Scoot to which it last night punted its existing order for 20 Boeing 787-9 Dreamliners while greatly expanding its commitments to new Airbus airliners.
Singapore Airlines was stung by the willingness of the government of Singapore to host Jetstar Asia using a somewhat questionable interpretation of what constituted a controlling Singaporean ownership which is known to be funded through a loan from Qantas.
Just one aspect of Singapore Airlines re-fleeting decisions last night is that it will make Scoot within three to four years a larger capacity carrier than the currently announced plans by Malaysia controlled AirAsia X or Qantas controlled Jetstar Asia.
As far as Jetstar in concerned, Singapore Airlines may be banking on a continuation of the Qantas ‘capital light’ approach to investments in new services and the newer, more fuel and maintenance efficient airlines that Qantas is denying itself in order to reduce its capital expenditure obligations for the next three years.
Qantas has cancelled 35 firm orders for the more competent version of the Dreamliner, the 787-9, a type which will now go to Scoot, and has made itself an Australian airline in its own right to Europe only from Sydney and Melbourne, relying on the Emiroo partnership to gift to Emirates those passengers who will no longer have direct Qantas flights from Perth, Adelaide, Brisbane or from other places where the inconvenience of connecting in Sydney or Melbourne is an absurdity.
Singapore Airlines is targeting the fundamental flaw in the Qantas strategy to turn around its long haul international business, which is that when you stand still waiting to achieve profitability for two, three or four years, or however long suits the management agenda at Qantas today, the competition doesn’t stop.
Instead you lose even more customers, and as history shows, they don’t come back.
The competition, lead by Emirates and Singapore Airlines, continues to grow its share in a market which is itself currently growing at a rate of around 6% per annum, and much more when key emerging routes in China and Asia in general are considered.
Qantas has no prospect of ever taking back what it has lost, including to its bigger benevolent approval pending business partner Emirates, on whose flights to Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore Qantas will also offer seats to customers who can no longer get what they might have previously wanted from the iconic flying kangaroo.
What Singapore Airlines did last night is aimed at both Emirates and Qantas. Changi is a hub airport which is efficient for connections to all of China and greater Asia as well as Europe, which Dubai, seven hours flight time to the west of Singapore certainly isn’t.
When Qantas announced a promised shake-up of its schedules and frequency recently to Singapore to improve its connections to Asia it underwhelmed and disappointed the market, as it has no natural ally for on going connections for full service flyers, and seems to believe that its customers will fly on uncompetitively configured smaller Qantas jets to Changi and then change to Jetstar flights, which is guaranteed to drive them to discover the Singapore Airlines/Silk Air alternatives.
This is a dangerous assumption for Qantas. Virgin Australia is now the alliance partner of Singapore Airlines, meaning it can increasingly offer a full service product all the way from its Australian cities to those served throughout the entire Asia-Pacific hemisphere on Singapore Airlines or its Silk Air subsidiary, as well as spring discount fares that compete with the limited offerings available on Jetstar.
The risk for Singapore Airlines in relation to the actions it is taking to secure more of the traffic between Australia and the world is that the weakness in the Qantas strategy is increasingly obvious, and thus increasingly likely to force it to abandon its ‘capital light’ paralysis, and do something that will keep it relevant in Asia to higher yield customers.












Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.
In this Emirooo debate the one thing I am not hearing from the Australian side is the difference in passenger charges/taxes charged by the EU to Singapore versus Dubai. In 5 years time the difference is about 250 AUD (even greater in B/F)each way this is a substantial cost saving on the Kangaroo route if your first port of call is as close to the EU as possible. My European mates say this is why Emiroo and other airlines in SE Asian part of the world are announcing or are about to announce. The taxes out of LHR are even greater.
Duncan,
There was a series of announcements in the UK and Europe in which it was said there would be a ‘no advantage’ application of the rules to prevent long distance rorting. It seemed that there will continue to be way of getting around the extra taxes, but they would involve more hotel bills and costs for a break of journey and the creating of separate fares for two different trips from say London to Melbourne.
The issues of special taxes or charges on air travellers remains fiercely argued in the EU and is the one trade issue on which the US, China and Russia appear to be in agreement. China is refusing to permit further purchases of Airbus jets other than those assembled by a Sino-Euro venture in China, until the regulations are lifted or changed.
I thought the UK APD rules were to the first stopover point,
so a stop in Dubai would be cheaper than Singapore, but transit to Australia would be the same whether on SQ, EK or QF.
The way to minimise APD is to fly into London, then out of Europe, ideally with Eurostar in between.
Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :
Thank you for registering, we have just sent you a confirmation email, which includes your new password to be entered below.