tip off
7

MH370: As the search ships gather, a new report is promised

Optimism in the search for MH370, ships congregating in the south Indian Ocean, and a 7 March release for the next report from the Malaysian investigation. It’s all happening, maybe!

The heartbreaking Pray for MH370 wall at Kuala Lumpur International

It may be coincidental that three of the four vessels searching for MH370 have come quite close together in a particular part of the south Indian Ocean today, and even more coincidental that Malaysia has signaled that it will issue a second interim report on the disappearance of the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-200ER on 7 March, one day short of the first anniversary of its disappearance.

But as the graphic supplied by Mike Chillit, a US based ship tracker shows, there does seem to be a lot of interest where the 90th east meridian meets 37 degrees S latitude, SW of Perth.

This is in the vicinity of where the first informed guesses were made of the likely impact with the sea of MH370, with at least 239 people on board, on 8 March 2014 after it suddenly went transponder dark to air traffic control radars over the Gulf of Thailand on its way from Kuala Lumpur to Beijing with a cargo manifest that has not, to this day, been fully revealed.

(It is more or less where a White House spokesperson said, five days later, that the jet was believed to have crashed and from where there were suggestions in satellite images of possible floating wreckage from the flight.)

The jet suddenly veered off course, crossed west above the Malaysia Peninsula, and ultimately, according to satellite data which picked up a semi regular signal from the flight, turned south and flew to oblivion in the south Indian Ocean.

It is important not to get too carried away with the shipping news from the Australian led search area, just as it is prudent not to ignore it.

Mike Chillit (@Mike Chillit on Twitter) shows the search tracks being sailed by the Fugros Equator, Discovery and new arrival, Supporter  this evening eastern Australian time. Fugro Supporter is carrying an automated underwater vehicle capable of searching the deepest and most confusing wrinkles and ‘black holes’ in the ocean floor, where wreckage may have escaped the resolution of earlier search coverage along the so called 7th arc of impact possibilities.

On this graphic (below) the focus of theoretical impact points calculated by the sceptical but expert Independent Group, the ATSB, and an Inmarsat calculation are shown, as well as the possibly entirely coincidental bunching up of the vessels.

With thanks to @Mike Chillit

It took quite some time for the Independent group to capture the attention of the Australian led search. It’s optimal impact point calculation is identified as 37.71 degrees South and 88.75 degrees East.  There may be an assumption that wreckage was circulated to the east or north east by a current, or driven in that direction by winds and waves if it was stuff that floated for a while and then sank.

But that is for those outside the tent, all conjuncture.

Today’s announcement in Kuala Lumpur that an interim report concerning the disappearance of MH370 will come out one day before the ICAO protocol that says air accident reports should be made within 30 days, and then a full year after the event doesn’t say it is the final report.

After the first interim or preliminary report, an investigation can make as many such reports as it sees fit and consistent with the objective of advancing air safety provided the second one comes out within a year.

So it can’t be said that this second MH370 report is going to be orchestrated to follow the discovery of the wreckage. It might be nice, but if the wreckage was identified tomorrow it is quite a stretch to envisage either or both of the flight recorders being recovered and analysed in that period, or other crucial parts of the wreckage being brought to the surface for study.

The first interim report by the Malaysian investigation team was not released until 1 May last year, and it coincided with the extraordinary revelation (made to an apparently sleeping media) by the acting transport minister Hishammuddin Hussein that cabinet had known about the western turnback on the morning of the crash, while officials lied about it to the media, and the country’s Prime Minister Najib Razak urged search partner nations to extend their resources even further into the South China Sea while knowing this was misleading, pointless and cruel to those hoping their loved ones were alive.

MH370 has everything. A lying government in Kuala Lumpur, suppressed cargo details, implausible scenarios as to cause or blame, and some very strange search decisions at times, while the forensic work on estimating what path the jet actually flew until its fuel ran out sits at the extreme end of flight modelling based on a range of reasonable yet possibly incorrect assumptions.

It also has the grief and loss of the families and friends of the 239 victims. Will they ever learn the truth?

7

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :



  • 1
    Khrish Oman
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 8:21 am | Permalink

    >while the forensic work on estimating what path the jet actually flew until its fuel ran out sits at the extreme end of flight modelling

    So why would the least likely position be chosen? Is it a cover story for a quite different recovery operation?

  • 2
    JohnB
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Our PM has been omnipresent in today’s edition of Crikey.

    Accordingly, I find it odd that PM Tony’s utterances soon after the crash have no been mentioned, for example, something to the effect that the wreckage was on the cusp of discovery.

  • 3
    Simon Gunson
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Actually Ben the conjecture you allude to that floating debris drifted away from 37.71 degrees South, 88.75 degrees East does not match reality.

    Reality is any debris from an impact can be tested at this website: http://oceanmotion.org/html/resources/drifter.htm

    Debris from an impact which you mention would drift ashore along the Australian Bight as far as Bass Strait. Clearly it hasn’t. It certainly never drifted ashore on Sumatra after 123 days which is the advice given to the ATSB. Therefore before the seabed search even began in Sept/Oct 2014, the JACC already knew the current search location was wrong.

    The debris field of 300 floating objects seen by satellite Thaichote on 24 March, associated with two different objects as big as Boeing 777 wings seen 16 and 18 March is the obvious clue. Malaysia instructed the JACC to ignore those debris on 27 March.

    Given their location and the existing drift pattern from 08-16 March 2014 they could not have drifted SE from the 7th Arc. Their drift pattern originates from a likely impact at 45.30 South, 85.30 East.

    On the day MH370 disappeared at 38 South, 87 East (ie 7th Arc) winds were 100kt from 230 True. At the impact location suggested by objects tracked by satellite in March, winds were 103-107 kt, 249 True.

    It is obvious if winds were from SW then those debris could not have drifted from NW.

  • 4
    Glen
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Simon, this is tiresome. The satellite-imaged debris you repeatedly cite are plotted here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/ba/MH370_SIO_search.png

    That’s around 1000 km SSE of ping ring seven. So, are you saying the stuff stayed afloat for 10-16 days while drifting for 1000 km, nearly at right angles to your cited drift trend, or are you saying that ping ring 7 is incorrect? If the latter, how? By an international conspiracy involving the world’s largest commercial satellite operator, or by some error of calculation that only you discern? Then there’s the aircraft fuel endurance, which also puts it in the water about 1000 km to the north, but I guess we aren’t to believe that either because some random Canadian blogger say so.

    (BTW Ben, just a H/T might have been polite…)

  • 5
    Accountant
    Posted January 29, 2015 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    I have great admiration for the people who did the hard yards with the complex technical forensics on the Inmarsat data. They can really come out of this with their reputations intact. Which is far more than can be said for the Malaysian government.

  • 6
    Simon Gunson
    Posted January 30, 2015 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Glen you are tiresome, Investigators ignored key facts for no valid reason.

    KAL007 debris washed ashore on Japan ten days after that crash

  • 7
    Dan B
    Posted January 31, 2015 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    Possibly irrelevant, but I overheard a group of people talking about MH370 yesterday afternoon. One person asked “have they even found that plane yet?” to which another of the group, supported by a third nonchalantly replied “yeah, they found it already, remember?”.
    A fourth person then clarified that they were talking about 2 different events. But I found it interesting that the separations collided to resolve the question regarding MH370. Had it not been for the person confirming they were talking about 2 separate events, this group would have believed the “missing” plane (MH370) had already been found (AirAsia QZ8501).
    I wonder how many other people draw the same conclusion, making the same mistake?
    I just thought it was interesting.

Please login below to comment, OR simply register here :