<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Family affairs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:35:29 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Politics_Obsessed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-433</link>
		<dc:creator>Politics_Obsessed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 07:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-433</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d agree Richard... I mean what can I say... I&#039;m obsessed. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d agree Richard&#8230; I mean what can I say&#8230; I&#8217;m obsessed. <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile-big.png' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Smith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 07:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-392</guid>
		<description>quote:Mr Green&quot;But Family First polled 4.6% in Hartley last time with 70% of preferences to the Liberals, so against a swing to Labor this time, the question again has to be asked, what help will Family First’s preferences be anyway? Minor parties have to work enormously hard to deliver more than 70% of preferences one way or the other.&quot;

Thought id just note that FF had the donkey vote 1 position. Also the donkey vote went from FF to lib (ALP recieve the donkey flow this time). thus i dont think either of those figures will be that high this time. Also the resdistribution took out paradise from the seat, the location of the AOG church. 

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote:Mr Green&#8221;But Family First polled 4.6% in Hartley last time with 70% of preferences to the Liberals, so against a swing to Labor this time, the question again has to be asked, what help will Family First’s preferences be anyway? Minor parties have to work enormously hard to deliver more than 70% of preferences one way or the other.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thought id just note that FF had the donkey vote 1 position. Also the donkey vote went from FF to lib (ALP recieve the donkey flow this time). thus i dont think either of those figures will be that high this time. Also the resdistribution took out paradise from the seat, the location of the AOG church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-386</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-386</guid>
		<description>Pardon the lapse into jargon Dave, I have clarified this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon the lapse into jargon Dave, I have clarified this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-385</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 00:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-385</guid>
		<description>Not sure of the precise technical answer, but a split ticket is effectively where a minor party (in this case) produces a how-to-vote card allowing  voters to choose which major party they will direct their preferences to, rather than directing preferences one way or the other. They do this by creating a how-to-vote card that is physically &quot;split&quot; into halves, each side showing a different set of preferences, usually one side with Lib/Nat ahead of the ALP and the other with the reverse.

This is basically to allow the voter to choose where their preferences go, rather than being dictated to by the party of their choice, but I always think the whole issue of &quot;directing&quot; preferences/split tickets etc (at least in a lower house election) is rather misleading, as there is absolutely no necessity to follow the party line anyway. Obviously many people do follow how-to-vote cards or it would otherwise not be an issue? As I recall reading somewhere (it may have been on this site), the whole issue of where the Greens will direct their preferences has become a traditional much publicised campaign non-event in every election in recent times. It will be interesting to see if the same becomes true of Family First.

Poll Bludger, thanks indeed for your excellent site - very entertaining and informative. I&#039;m sure it must make a mess of the rest of your life to keep things up to date (especially with 2 state elections most inconveniently scheduled for the same day, not to mention a couple of by-elections in close proximity), but rest assured there are many of us who would struggle through the day without a regular psephological instalment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure of the precise technical answer, but a split ticket is effectively where a minor party (in this case) produces a how-to-vote card allowing  voters to choose which major party they will direct their preferences to, rather than directing preferences one way or the other. They do this by creating a how-to-vote card that is physically &#8220;split&#8221; into halves, each side showing a different set of preferences, usually one side with Lib/Nat ahead of the ALP and the other with the reverse.</p>
<p>This is basically to allow the voter to choose where their preferences go, rather than being dictated to by the party of their choice, but I always think the whole issue of &#8220;directing&#8221; preferences/split tickets etc (at least in a lower house election) is rather misleading, as there is absolutely no necessity to follow the party line anyway. Obviously many people do follow how-to-vote cards or it would otherwise not be an issue? As I recall reading somewhere (it may have been on this site), the whole issue of where the Greens will direct their preferences has become a traditional much publicised campaign non-event in every election in recent times. It will be interesting to see if the same becomes true of Family First.</p>
<p>Poll Bludger, thanks indeed for your excellent site &#8211; very entertaining and informative. I&#8217;m sure it must make a mess of the rest of your life to keep things up to date (especially with 2 state elections most inconveniently scheduled for the same day, not to mention a couple of by-elections in close proximity), but rest assured there are many of us who would struggle through the day without a regular psephological instalment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-384</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-384</guid>
		<description>Anthony or William, (or someone else), can you explain to me exactly what a split ticket means?  Sorry for my naivety.  

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anthony or William, (or someone else), can you explain to me exactly what a split ticket means?  Sorry for my naivety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-383</guid>
		<description>As always, take any &#039;Tiser election reporting with a large grain of salt. They reported incorrectly yesterday - as indeed did the Oz - that FF had agreed to preference Labor in the Upper House in exchange for a conscience rather than binding Caucus vote on the Relationships Bill - a &quot;deal&quot; reps from both parties were quick to deny. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As always, take any &#8216;Tiser election reporting with a large grain of salt. They reported incorrectly yesterday &#8211; as indeed did the Oz &#8211; that FF had agreed to preference Labor in the Upper House in exchange for a conscience rather than binding Caucus vote on the Relationships Bill &#8211; a &#8220;deal&#8221; reps from both parties were quick to deny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Riley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/07/family-affairs/comment-page-1/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 12:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/330#comment-376</guid>
		<description>I am enjoying your election coverage pollie. Thanks for taking the time and effort to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am enjoying your election coverage pollie. Thanks for taking the time and effort to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
