<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Norwood from the trees</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:22:12 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam pearce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2190</link>
		<dc:creator>adam pearce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 08:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-2190</guid>
		<description>Ok first things first i as a voter in that electorate, shouldent have to do that effective campaigns get the message accross yours didnt,when you did have the chance you parroted labor properganda, of which i could of heard from the labor website and saved my time from reading the paper.Local issues in country electorates REALLY hit home you should know that you failed in that too.

Whilst i agree you have to agree with the parties policies and stuff to run as a candidate that doesnt make you a robot.Also more grassroots campaigning wouldent of gone astray and orgainising a public meeting ($200 a head dinners DONT COUNT) and handing out some flyers around the place wouldent hurt either.Im a pissed off voter who is SICK of liberal domination of my seat,wants a STRONG labor candidate and quite frankly at the last election you didnt cut it,you got hit for six by the nationals when they did run a strong campaign and really gave the liberal a fright if you could do that (or someone else maybe ;) ) i would be happy.

P.S I thought the labor party was awash with cash, maybe doing some begging for more funds wouldent hurt and you can get some original banners on there.

Yours truly
Adam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok first things first i as a voter in that electorate, shouldent have to do that effective campaigns get the message accross yours didnt,when you did have the chance you parroted labor properganda, of which i could of heard from the labor website and saved my time from reading the paper.Local issues in country electorates REALLY hit home you should know that you failed in that too.</p>
<p>Whilst i agree you have to agree with the parties policies and stuff to run as a candidate that doesnt make you a robot.Also more grassroots campaigning wouldent of gone astray and orgainising a public meeting ($200 a head dinners DONT COUNT) and handing out some flyers around the place wouldent hurt either.Im a pissed off voter who is SICK of liberal domination of my seat,wants a STRONG labor candidate and quite frankly at the last election you didnt cut it,you got hit for six by the nationals when they did run a strong campaign and really gave the liberal a fright if you could do that (or someone else maybe <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-wink.png' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) i would be happy.</p>
<p>P.S I thought the labor party was awash with cash, maybe doing some begging for more funds wouldent hurt and you can get some original banners on there.</p>
<p>Yours truly<br />
Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Owens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2189</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 07:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-2189</guid>
		<description>I strongly respect what it takes to put yourself out there and stand for election - I stood as an independent candidate for another election and worked very hard to get my message out and succeeded to some extent, especially with the local media in one-third of the electorate I ran for.

I found it was one thing to have views and another entirely for the public to discover what they were. This comes down to communications management and is often subject to the twin perils of money and time. It is the unusual elector who calls to find out about policies from the candidate themselves, even if they make themselves available - the most effective methods are still grassroots campaigning, a strong online presence, a persistent stream of media releases, etc. In general people are apathetic about politics and expect to be spoon-fed - anyone who doesn&#039;t learn this quickly does so at their own peril.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I strongly respect what it takes to put yourself out there and stand for election &#8211; I stood as an independent candidate for another election and worked very hard to get my message out and succeeded to some extent, especially with the local media in one-third of the electorate I ran for.</p>
<p>I found it was one thing to have views and another entirely for the public to discover what they were. This comes down to communications management and is often subject to the twin perils of money and time. It is the unusual elector who calls to find out about policies from the candidate themselves, even if they make themselves available &#8211; the most effective methods are still grassroots campaigning, a strong online presence, a persistent stream of media releases, etc. In general people are apathetic about politics and expect to be spoon-fed &#8211; anyone who doesn&#8217;t learn this quickly does so at their own peril.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Lovegrove</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-2188</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lovegrove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 05:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-2188</guid>
		<description>Post Blog Comment - Bulldust, adam from flinders. As the Labor Candidate for Flinders in the 2002 &amp; 2006 State Election I had and still have very strong opinions about most subjects that affect us. Certainly would not have been a Candidate for a Rann led Government or for that matter a Labor team if I did not agree and endorse the policies.  I cannot recall receiving a phone call from yourself enquiring about my opinions, please ring and I will give you opinions for hours. As for the &#039;Mike Rann gets results&#039; that I personally placed on the local stobies, I would have put my own up for both elections but I could not afford it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post Blog Comment &#8211; Bulldust, adam from flinders. As the Labor Candidate for Flinders in the 2002 &amp; 2006 State Election I had and still have very strong opinions about most subjects that affect us. Certainly would not have been a Candidate for a Rann led Government or for that matter a Labor team if I did not agree and endorse the policies.  I cannot recall receiving a phone call from yourself enquiring about my opinions, please ring and I will give you opinions for hours. As for the &#8216;Mike Rann gets results&#8217; that I personally placed on the local stobies, I would have put my own up for both elections but I could not afford it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Poll Bludger  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; South Australian election wrap-up</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>The Poll Bludger  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; South Australian election wrap-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-856</guid>
		<description>[...] ge, the only observer who publicly predicted the latter outcome was Poll Bludger commenter Dave S. 	The upper house has passed without comment on this seat since the days immediately after the  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>...] ge, the only observer who publicly predicted the latter outcome was Poll Bludger commenter Dave S. 	The upper house has passed without comment on this seat since the days immediately after the  [...</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam from flinders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>adam from flinders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2006 03:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-576</guid>
		<description>Hello dave i really do hope that your right, i know that our member federally is doing the same.Anyhoo i dont think that there is ANY lefties in the labor party (well with the number for leadership put it that way) this has being the most conservative labor govt for along time.Anyway i think that it will be interesting if labor get a majority in the upper house, i think there rantings about abolishing it will be gone.But if liberals get it (doubtful) it might intersify but if they get a pliant upper house they will shut up.Anyway i think that the liberal party will crash severly. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello dave i really do hope that your right, i know that our member federally is doing the same.Anyhoo i dont think that there is ANY lefties in the labor party (well with the number for leadership put it that way) this has being the most conservative labor govt for along time.Anyway i think that it will be interesting if labor get a majority in the upper house, i think there rantings about abolishing it will be gone.But if liberals get it (doubtful) it might intersify but if they get a pliant upper house they will shut up.Anyway i think that the liberal party will crash severly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheyne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I think there is still a huge chance Hartley will fall, feedback from my mothers side of the family which are connected to the Scalzi&#039;s roud every corner, show that the man has absolutly no credibility, and his &quot;son&#039;s&quot; letter to the sunday mail only compounded feelings that he is a joke.For example at the last election the man acctual tried to win over voters at a gathering of elderly italians by describing to them how it works out cheaper to keep him in office than to pay the salary of a new MP and his pension! Norwood will also come down to the wire as most would expect I can&#039;t see a certain result for some time as whom ever wins in both Hartley and Norwood will probably have all sorts of challenges on their hands. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is still a huge chance Hartley will fall, feedback from my mothers side of the family which are connected to the Scalzi&#8217;s roud every corner, show that the man has absolutly no credibility, and his &#8220;son&#8217;s&#8221; letter to the sunday mail only compounded feelings that he is a joke.For example at the last election the man acctual tried to win over voters at a gathering of elderly italians by describing to them how it works out cheaper to keep him in office than to pay the salary of a new MP and his pension! Norwood will also come down to the wire as most would expect I can&#8217;t see a certain result for some time as whom ever wins in both Hartley and Norwood will probably have all sorts of challenges on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-559</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 05:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-559</guid>
		<description>Adam, this is Lizzie&#039;s last blast at Flinders.  She&#039;s a funny old bird eh?!  I have a mate from an old farming clan over there who is sounding of the electoral for the post-Lizzie movement.  He reckons he has a strong chance!  She&#039;ll throw in the towel at the end of this cycle if not before ...  

Why am I handing out Liberal how-to-vote cards?  Because I believe Rann with a mega-majority would be a terrible outcome for SA (the State is toying with the idea of recession) and I want to see a Conservative block in the upper house to reign in the nonsense of a post-Rann era likely led by Lomax-Smith or Weatherall (raving lefties!).  I do not rate Foley as the heir apparent and I think Rann may not last the term.  Presidential spinners always come undone.  

Family First taking Kavel.  It&#039;s a bit of a long-shot but I wanted to do something outrageous in my last blast of pollbludging.  Goldsworthy has a very low profile in Parliament, though I&#039;m not sure of what he is like locally (I live in doomed Bright, nowhere near the Hills).  Tomorrow&#039;s election will produce shocks, I may be at Party Headquarters for the latter part of the count if the pollbludger wants an insider (which I&#039;m sure he&#039;s got already) he can feel free to email me tonight and I will provide him with contact details.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam, this is Lizzie&#8217;s last blast at Flinders.  She&#8217;s a funny old bird eh?!  I have a mate from an old farming clan over there who is sounding of the electoral for the post-Lizzie movement.  He reckons he has a strong chance!  She&#8217;ll throw in the towel at the end of this cycle if not before &#8230;  </p>
<p>Why am I handing out Liberal how-to-vote cards?  Because I believe Rann with a mega-majority would be a terrible outcome for SA (the State is toying with the idea of recession) and I want to see a Conservative block in the upper house to reign in the nonsense of a post-Rann era likely led by Lomax-Smith or Weatherall (raving lefties!).  I do not rate Foley as the heir apparent and I think Rann may not last the term.  Presidential spinners always come undone.  </p>
<p>Family First taking Kavel.  It&#8217;s a bit of a long-shot but I wanted to do something outrageous in my last blast of pollbludging.  Goldsworthy has a very low profile in Parliament, though I&#8217;m not sure of what he is like locally (I live in doomed Bright, nowhere near the Hills).  Tomorrow&#8217;s election will produce shocks, I may be at Party Headquarters for the latter part of the count if the pollbludger wants an insider (which I&#8217;m sure he&#8217;s got already) he can feel free to email me tonight and I will provide him with contact details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walsh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-556</link>
		<dc:creator>David Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 04:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-556</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Norwood Pro Liberal swing of 1% Liberal GAIN&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Nigel Smart&#039;s paying $5 at centrebet if you&#039;re keen.

Unfortunately no odds for Kavel (or any other seat for that matter). Personally I&#039;m sceptical about the logic that a minor party endorsement would broaden Playford&#039;s appeal. My bet is that he&#039;ll score less than the 18.7% he got in 2002.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Norwood Pro Liberal swing of 1% Liberal GAIN</p></blockquote>
<p>Nigel Smart&#8217;s paying $5 at centrebet if you&#8217;re keen.</p>
<p>Unfortunately no odds for Kavel (or any other seat for that matter). Personally I&#8217;m sceptical about the logic that a minor party endorsement would broaden Playford&#8217;s appeal. My bet is that he&#8217;ll score less than the 18.7% he got in 2002.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam from flinders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>adam from flinders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-554</guid>
		<description>Hello dave i think that most of your predictions will happen.But kavel going to FFP i bloody hope not i really hope that they dont even get a LC seat.If you think that the opposition has no substance, how come your going to hand out HTV cards for liberals?.Anyway i think that nationals in my seat will make it slightly interesting but i suggest about 6-10% win for lizzie.Any less and it will be on for young and old come 2010 election,she might have to get off her arse and do something other than fucking grandstanding. &gt;:( </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello dave i think that most of your predictions will happen.But kavel going to FFP i bloody hope not i really hope that they dont even get a LC seat.If you think that the opposition has no substance, how come your going to hand out HTV cards for liberals?.Anyway i think that nationals in my seat will make it slightly interesting but i suggest about 6-10% win for lizzie.Any less and it will be on for young and old come 2010 election,she might have to get off her arse and do something other than fucking grandstanding. &gt;:(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave S</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/03/16/norwood-from-the-trees/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/340#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Polls are totally screwed at this election.  Yesterday we had a potential Liberal gain indicated in Norwood and the holding of the Libs most marginal seat (Hartley).  Today we see the Morgan poll indicating a catastrophic pro-Labor swing.  

Tomorrow&#039;s election will be influenced by localised swings and roundabouts.  Outer-suburbs and existing Labor seats swing to Labor.  Inner suburbs have little or no pro-Labor swing with a couple of anomalies along the way.  

Rural areas are not being accurately gauged with only one Advertiser poll focusing at rural electorates, and that suggested a significant pro-Labor swing. 

It&#039;s almost time, the election posters are hanging off the stobie polls, people look tired, Rann&#039;s presidential campaign has worn thin, people are desperate for an Opposition with substance but haven&#039;t found one.  Tomorrow I will work all day in a polling booth handing out Liberal how-to-vote cards.  

At the beginning of the campaign I predicted Labor gaining 2 seats.  I revise this to 4: Light, Bright, Morialta and Stuart.  

I am predicting that Labor will LOSE Norwood and that Labor&#039;s man in the South East, Independent Rory McEwen will fall on a massive pro-Liberal swing.  The Liberals will also pick up the easy gain of Hammond.  

The Libs should hold marginal Hartley and fend off the challenge in Mawson (Brokenshire&#039;s high personal vote will sustain him, though he will lament the lack of FFP preferences in his southern bible belt seat).  

I predict 7% to be wiped off the margin in Unley, but for it to be a narrow Liberal retain.  

I predict up to 15% will be wiped off Liz Penfold&#039;s massive cushion in the Liberal stronghold of Flinders, the recipients will be the National Party.  

At the beginning of the campaign the Libs could have lost safe Finniss but an interesting policy to upgrade the Victor Harbor-Adelaide Road will have saved the day and the margin will suffer little despite the National candidate being a popular local Mayor.  

Labor&#039;s two gains of 2002, Colton and Adelaide, can expect big lurches in their favour, both of over 5%.  Other marginal Labor electorates such as Ashford and Wright will see significant pro-Labor swings but expect Elder, the seat of Transport Minister Patrick Conlon, to have little upward swing.  A strong localised campaign by fantastic candidate Heidi Greaves will negate Labor&#039;s statewide popularity.  

Kavel is a seat which should be carefully watched and I am going to go out on a very fragile limb and call this as a spectacular Family First gain. 

Mitchell, touted as the proprety of Rosemary Clancy for Labor, will be delivered to Independent Kris Hanna against popular opinion.  

Therefore my predictions are: 

Adelaide        Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Labor Retain
Ashford         Pro-Labor swing of over 7%     Labor Retain
Bragg            Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Liberal Retain
Bright            Pro-Labor swing of 5.5%          Labor GAIN
Chaffey         Pro-National swing of over 5%  National Retain
Cheltenham   Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Labor Retain
Colton           Pro-Labor swing of over 7%     Labor Retain
Davenport     Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Liberal Retain
Elder             Pro-Labor swing of 1% or less  Labor Retain
Enfield           Pro-Labor swing of over 10%   Labor Retain
Finniss           Pro-National swing of 5%         Liberal Retain
Fisher            Labor to take Such close to wire   Independent Retain
Flinders         Pro-National swing of at least 10%  Liberal Retain
Florey           Big FFP vote, small swing to Lib       Labor Retain
Frome           (Kerin&#039;s seat) Swing of 5% to Labor    Liberal Retain
Giles             Swing of 1% towards Libs                  Labor Retain
Goyder          Swing of 5% towards Labor               Liberal Retain
Hammond      Back to Liberal camp, hold by 10%    Liberal GAIN
Hartley          Small swing to Labor of 1%               Liberal Retain
Heysen          Swing of about 5% towards Labor      Liberal Retain
Kaurna          Swing of more than 7% towards Labor    Labor Retain
Kavel            Catastrophic result for Liberal                 FAMILY FIRST GAIN
Lee               Pro-Labor swing in region of 7%             Labor Retain
Light             Pro-Labor swing over 5%                       LABOR GAIN
Little Para      Pro-Labor swing over 5%                       Labor Retain
Mackillop       Pro-Labor swing of over 5%                   Liberal Retain
Mawson         Pro-Labor swing of 3%                          Liberal Retain
Mitchell          Independent gain                                 Independent GAIN
Morialta         Pro-Labor swing of 4%                          Labor GAIN
Morphett        Pro-Labor swing of over 5%                  Liberal Retain
Mt Gambier    Pro-Liberal swing of over 30%               LIBERAL GAIN
Napier           Pro-Labor swing of over 10%                 Labor Retain
Newland        Pro-Labor swing of 4%                          Liberal Retain
Norwood        Pro Liberal swing of 1%                        Liberal GAIN
Playford         Pro-Labor swing of over 10%                Labor Retain
Port Adelaide  Pro-Labor swing of over 7%                  Labor Retain
Ramsay         Pro-Labor swing of over 7%                  Labor Retain
Reynell          Pro-Labor swing of around 4%              Labor Retain
Schubert       Pro-Labor swing of around 7%               Liberal Retain
Stuart           Pro-Labor swing of around 3%               LABOR GAIN
Taylor           Pro Labor swing of around 7%               Labor Retain
Torrens        Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Labor Retain
Unley           Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Liberal Retain
Waite           Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Liberal Retain
W Torrens    Pro-Labor swing of around 2%                Labor Retain
Wright          Pro-Labor swing of around 5%                Labor Retain



</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polls are totally screwed at this election.  Yesterday we had a potential Liberal gain indicated in Norwood and the holding of the Libs most marginal seat (Hartley).  Today we see the Morgan poll indicating a catastrophic pro-Labor swing.  </p>
<p>Tomorrow&#8217;s election will be influenced by localised swings and roundabouts.  Outer-suburbs and existing Labor seats swing to Labor.  Inner suburbs have little or no pro-Labor swing with a couple of anomalies along the way.  </p>
<p>Rural areas are not being accurately gauged with only one Advertiser poll focusing at rural electorates, and that suggested a significant pro-Labor swing. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s almost time, the election posters are hanging off the stobie polls, people look tired, Rann&#8217;s presidential campaign has worn thin, people are desperate for an Opposition with substance but haven&#8217;t found one.  Tomorrow I will work all day in a polling booth handing out Liberal how-to-vote cards.  </p>
<p>At the beginning of the campaign I predicted Labor gaining 2 seats.  I revise this to 4: Light, Bright, Morialta and Stuart.  </p>
<p>I am predicting that Labor will LOSE Norwood and that Labor&#8217;s man in the South East, Independent Rory McEwen will fall on a massive pro-Liberal swing.  The Liberals will also pick up the easy gain of Hammond.  </p>
<p>The Libs should hold marginal Hartley and fend off the challenge in Mawson (Brokenshire&#8217;s high personal vote will sustain him, though he will lament the lack of FFP preferences in his southern bible belt seat).  </p>
<p>I predict 7% to be wiped off the margin in Unley, but for it to be a narrow Liberal retain.  </p>
<p>I predict up to 15% will be wiped off Liz Penfold&#8217;s massive cushion in the Liberal stronghold of Flinders, the recipients will be the National Party.  </p>
<p>At the beginning of the campaign the Libs could have lost safe Finniss but an interesting policy to upgrade the Victor Harbor-Adelaide Road will have saved the day and the margin will suffer little despite the National candidate being a popular local Mayor.  </p>
<p>Labor&#8217;s two gains of 2002, Colton and Adelaide, can expect big lurches in their favour, both of over 5%.  Other marginal Labor electorates such as Ashford and Wright will see significant pro-Labor swings but expect Elder, the seat of Transport Minister Patrick Conlon, to have little upward swing.  A strong localised campaign by fantastic candidate Heidi Greaves will negate Labor&#8217;s statewide popularity.  </p>
<p>Kavel is a seat which should be carefully watched and I am going to go out on a very fragile limb and call this as a spectacular Family First gain. </p>
<p>Mitchell, touted as the proprety of Rosemary Clancy for Labor, will be delivered to Independent Kris Hanna against popular opinion.  </p>
<p>Therefore my predictions are: </p>
<p>Adelaide        Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Labor Retain<br />
Ashford         Pro-Labor swing of over 7%     Labor Retain<br />
Bragg            Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Liberal Retain<br />
Bright            Pro-Labor swing of 5.5%          Labor GAIN<br />
Chaffey         Pro-National swing of over 5%  National Retain<br />
Cheltenham   Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Labor Retain<br />
Colton           Pro-Labor swing of over 7%     Labor Retain<br />
Davenport     Pro-Labor swing of over 5%     Liberal Retain<br />
Elder             Pro-Labor swing of 1% or less  Labor Retain<br />
Enfield           Pro-Labor swing of over 10%   Labor Retain<br />
Finniss           Pro-National swing of 5%         Liberal Retain<br />
Fisher            Labor to take Such close to wire   Independent Retain<br />
Flinders         Pro-National swing of at least 10%  Liberal Retain<br />
Florey           Big FFP vote, small swing to Lib       Labor Retain<br />
Frome           (Kerin&#8217;s seat) Swing of 5% to Labor    Liberal Retain<br />
Giles             Swing of 1% towards Libs                  Labor Retain<br />
Goyder          Swing of 5% towards Labor               Liberal Retain<br />
Hammond      Back to Liberal camp, hold by 10%    Liberal GAIN<br />
Hartley          Small swing to Labor of 1%               Liberal Retain<br />
Heysen          Swing of about 5% towards Labor      Liberal Retain<br />
Kaurna          Swing of more than 7% towards Labor    Labor Retain<br />
Kavel            Catastrophic result for Liberal                 FAMILY FIRST GAIN<br />
Lee               Pro-Labor swing in region of 7%             Labor Retain<br />
Light             Pro-Labor swing over 5%                       LABOR GAIN<br />
Little Para      Pro-Labor swing over 5%                       Labor Retain<br />
Mackillop       Pro-Labor swing of over 5%                   Liberal Retain<br />
Mawson         Pro-Labor swing of 3%                          Liberal Retain<br />
Mitchell          Independent gain                                 Independent GAIN<br />
Morialta         Pro-Labor swing of 4%                          Labor GAIN<br />
Morphett        Pro-Labor swing of over 5%                  Liberal Retain<br />
Mt Gambier    Pro-Liberal swing of over 30%               LIBERAL GAIN<br />
Napier           Pro-Labor swing of over 10%                 Labor Retain<br />
Newland        Pro-Labor swing of 4%                          Liberal Retain<br />
Norwood        Pro Liberal swing of 1%                        Liberal GAIN<br />
Playford         Pro-Labor swing of over 10%                Labor Retain<br />
Port Adelaide  Pro-Labor swing of over 7%                  Labor Retain<br />
Ramsay         Pro-Labor swing of over 7%                  Labor Retain<br />
Reynell          Pro-Labor swing of around 4%              Labor Retain<br />
Schubert       Pro-Labor swing of around 7%               Liberal Retain<br />
Stuart           Pro-Labor swing of around 3%               LABOR GAIN<br />
Taylor           Pro Labor swing of around 7%               Labor Retain<br />
Torrens        Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Labor Retain<br />
Unley           Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Liberal Retain<br />
Waite           Pro-Labor swing of around 7%                Liberal Retain<br />
W Torrens    Pro-Labor swing of around 2%                Labor Retain<br />
Wright          Pro-Labor swing of around 5%                Labor Retain</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
