<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highlights of week two</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:41:16 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2492</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2492</guid>
		<description>As far as three cornered contests go, Noosa could be interesting as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as three cornered contests go, Noosa could be interesting as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2487</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2487</guid>
		<description>The most interesting electorate this election is Gympie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most interesting electorate this election is Gympie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2484</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2484</guid>
		<description>Thank you Dave. Seats are, of course, won on the two-party vote (notwithstanding the impact of optional preferential) therefore Steve may need to be more precise in his electoral postulations. 13% was the tpp movement last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Dave. Seats are, of course, won on the two-party vote (notwithstanding the impact of optional preferential) therefore Steve may need to be more precise in his electoral postulations. 13% was the tpp movement last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2483</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2483</guid>
		<description>Its only 7.5 before preferences. If your going to check something at least do it properly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its only 7.5 before preferences. If your going to check something at least do it properly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Bahnisch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2482</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Bahnisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 06:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2482</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/08/29/crikey-story-preferences-and-the-queensland-campaign/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Trackback&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://larvatusprodeo.net/2006/08/29/crikey-story-preferences-and-the-queensland-campaign/" rel="nofollow">Trackback</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2480</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2480</guid>
		<description>Fred,
I am certainly not the National party candidate,  I don&#039;t live in Kurwongbah and in fact I am more likely to vote Labor than Liberal/ National. The poll I refer to was primary vote and I presume a small number of people polled. Also the only other candidate running in Kurwongbah is a Green who I presume will give preferences to Labor, which will still most likely result in a healthy majority for Labor. 
Also I checked the ecq figures from last time, the National candidate polled 31.5% so this is only a increase of 7.5%(Give or take error). Not  13%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred,<br />
I am certainly not the National party candidate,  I don&#8217;t live in Kurwongbah and in fact I am more likely to vote Labor than Liberal/ National. The poll I refer to was primary vote and I presume a small number of people polled. Also the only other candidate running in Kurwongbah is a Green who I presume will give preferences to Labor, which will still most likely result in a healthy majority for Labor.<br />
Also I checked the ecq figures from last time, the National candidate polled 31.5% so this is only a increase of 7.5%(Give or take error). Not  13%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>One more things, now I&#039;ve done more homework!
- The Nat is the same joker as ran on 2004. Where&#039;s the extra 13% coming from this time around? Why is he more wildly popular than last time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more things, now I&#8217;ve done more homework!<br />
- The Nat is the same joker as ran on 2004. Where&#8217;s the extra 13% coming from this time around? Why is he more wildly popular than last time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 04:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that &quot;Steve&quot; is either the Nationals candidate for Kurwongbah or working on the Nationals campaign. I am more than a little suspicious when people start talking about safe seats as &quot;bolters&quot;. Furthermore, given the electoral tide is not moving to the Coalition at this election, it strains credibility to suggest that an Opposition candidate could get another 13% swing on top of a 10% swing at the previous election. Such a thing would happen if the local member were caught, say, rooting a sheep (think Currumbin at the last Qld election) &lt;i&gt;LEGAL NOTE: Merri Rose was &lt;/i&gt;not&lt;i&gt; caught rooting a sheep - PB lawyers&lt;/i&gt;. Furthermore, Nats in urban areas aren&#039;t a good combination. If it was a Lib running you&#039;ld have a stronger case.
Keep talking it up Steve, it&#039;s good to add colour to the blog, but talk of the Nats winning the seat (or even coming close) is bollocks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that &#8220;Steve&#8221; is either the Nationals candidate for Kurwongbah or working on the Nationals campaign. I am more than a little suspicious when people start talking about safe seats as &#8220;bolters&#8221;. Furthermore, given the electoral tide is not moving to the Coalition at this election, it strains credibility to suggest that an Opposition candidate could get another 13% swing on top of a 10% swing at the previous election. Such a thing would happen if the local member were caught, say, rooting a sheep (think Currumbin at the last Qld election) <i>LEGAL NOTE: Merri Rose was </i>not<i> caught rooting a sheep &#8211; PB lawyers</i>. Furthermore, Nats in urban areas aren&#8217;t a good combination. If it was a Lib running you&#8217;ld have a stronger case.<br />
Keep talking it up Steve, it&#8217;s good to add colour to the blog, but talk of the Nats winning the seat (or even coming close) is bollocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Aug 2006 01:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>If further to my comments posted yesterday, I have done a little background checking, and found out that the Nationals candidate, a local butcher, has had involvement in many community organisations (Bowls Club, Community Bank) and &quot;has donated countless meat trays to sporting organistaions&quot;, this may push his vote higher in what could be described as safe Labor seat.

Surprisingly, in the polling I mentioned yesterday more people were familiar with the National candidates name than that of the Labor member (who is also a minister), who it seems since this polling has been running a higher profile.

This seat may be one of the ones decided on prefences, or lack of them, given by the Greens. Definately one to watch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If further to my comments posted yesterday, I have done a little background checking, and found out that the Nationals candidate, a local butcher, has had involvement in many community organisations (Bowls Club, Community Bank) and &#8220;has donated countless meat trays to sporting organistaions&#8221;, this may push his vote higher in what could be described as safe Labor seat.</p>
<p>Surprisingly, in the polling I mentioned yesterday more people were familiar with the National candidates name than that of the Labor member (who is also a minister), who it seems since this polling has been running a higher profile.</p>
<p>This seat may be one of the ones decided on prefences, or lack of them, given by the Greens. Definately one to watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphacoward</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2006/08/28/highlights-of-week-two/comment-page-1/#comment-2471</link>
		<dc:creator>alphacoward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 23:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/376#comment-2471</guid>
		<description>if the blue collar working class electorate of kurwongbah swings away from labor then all i can say is wow.

what has the world come to when inner city indooropilly votes labor and blue collar kurwongbah votes conservative!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the blue collar working class electorate of kurwongbah swings away from labor then all i can say is wow.</p>
<p>what has the world come to when inner city indooropilly votes labor and blue collar kurwongbah votes conservative!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
