<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Other stuff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:15:13 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Peter Fuller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17645</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17645</guid>
		<description>John,
I agree, it&#039;s very unlikely to impact on the election outcome. My guesstimate was purely in the context of this thread, i.e. Tuesday&#039;s Newspoll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John,<br />
I agree, it&#8217;s very unlikely to impact on the election outcome. My guesstimate was purely in the context of this thread, i.e. Tuesday&#8217;s Newspoll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17399</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2007 07:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17399</guid>
		<description>Peter Fuller,

It may affect the next poll but come election day do you really think voters will remember it? It&#039;s a non-issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Fuller,</p>
<p>It may affect the next poll but come election day do you really think voters will remember it? It&#8217;s a non-issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Fuller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17317</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 05:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17317</guid>
		<description>I think Newspoll will be 58-42 Labor&#039;s way. I expect some reaction to the Kirribilli House budget buffet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Newspoll will be 58-42 Labor&#8217;s way. I expect some reaction to the Kirribilli House budget buffet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17304</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17304</guid>
		<description>Martin B - to be fair to Edward he was only commenting on the next Newspoll. Noone believes such high figures for Labor will be achieved next election. The big question is what will Labor&#039;s solid primary vote will be by the time the election comes around. I&#039;m guessing 46/47, which will be more than enough for it to win the next election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin B &#8211; to be fair to Edward he was only commenting on the next Newspoll. Noone believes such high figures for Labor will be achieved next election. The big question is what will Labor&#8217;s solid primary vote will be by the time the election comes around. I&#8217;m guessing 46/47, which will be more than enough for it to win the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17289</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17289</guid>
		<description>&quot;Iâ€™m not quite sure about voluntary voting encouraging extremism.&quot;

I think the point is that in voluntary systems there is an increased focus on mobilising your committed voters (who include some extremists) and correspondingly less focus on appealing to the uncommitted centre, who are more likely to just stay home in the middle of a confusing mud-fest. An example is the importance of appealing to the anti-abortion anti-evolution christian right for Republican candidates.


&quot;I donâ€™t see how those pushing the â€œyou should already be correctly enrolledâ€ line can credibly argue that ordinary citizens should be more politically engaged than political parties.&quot;

This is the same government that argues with a straight face that collective bargaining is important for small business, but unimportant for workers... :-)


&quot;Guess weâ€™ll all be pretty silly if its 59:41&quot;

If the election ends up with a 2PP vote of 59/41 the Liberal Party will be dead as an effective organization and there won&#039;t be enough chickens in the country to produce eggs for the faces of the mainstream media *and* the blogosphere... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Iâ€™m not quite sure about voluntary voting encouraging extremism.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the point is that in voluntary systems there is an increased focus on mobilising your committed voters (who include some extremists) and correspondingly less focus on appealing to the uncommitted centre, who are more likely to just stay home in the middle of a confusing mud-fest. An example is the importance of appealing to the anti-abortion anti-evolution christian right for Republican candidates.</p>
<p>&#8220;I donâ€™t see how those pushing the â€œyou should already be correctly enrolledâ€ line can credibly argue that ordinary citizens should be more politically engaged than political parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is the same government that argues with a straight face that collective bargaining is important for small business, but unimportant for workers&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;Guess weâ€™ll all be pretty silly if its 59:41&#8243;</p>
<p>If the election ends up with a 2PP vote of 59/41 the Liberal Party will be dead as an effective organization and there won&#8217;t be enough chickens in the country to produce eggs for the faces of the mainstream media *and* the blogosphere&#8230; <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17288</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 02:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17288</guid>
		<description>57 - 43 - interestingly, most don&#039;t seem to agree with Galaxy. Is ACNeilsen definitely due this week?
Hartcher, to me, always comes across as another cheerleader for the coalition. I think journalists would be on AWA&#039;s wouldn&#039;t they? Boy that hip pocket nerve must be shaking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>57 &#8211; 43 &#8211; interestingly, most don&#8217;t seem to agree with Galaxy. Is ACNeilsen definitely due this week?<br />
Hartcher, to me, always comes across as another cheerleader for the coalition. I think journalists would be on AWA&#8217;s wouldn&#8217;t they? Boy that hip pocket nerve must be shaking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward StJohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17285</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward StJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17285</guid>
		<description>Interesting of 7 posts no one thinks the 2PP will stay at or near 60:40 its just a question of the degree it seems.

Guess we&#039;ll all be pretty silly if its 59:41</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting of 7 posts no one thinks the 2PP will stay at or near 60:40 its just a question of the degree it seems.</p>
<p>Guess we&#8217;ll all be pretty silly if its 59:41</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blacklight</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-2/#comment-17283</link>
		<dc:creator>Blacklight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17283</guid>
		<description>ill say 55-45

there..all bases covered?

heh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ill say 55-45</p>
<p>there..all bases covered?</p>
<p>heh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt D</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-17282</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17282</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go with Ed St John, 54-46.

I now think the election will end up being 50-50 with the ALP falling about six seats short.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go with Ed St John, 54-46.</p>
<p>I now think the election will end up being 50-50 with the ALP falling about six seats short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/06/14/other-stuff/comment-page-1/#comment-17281</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/491#comment-17281</guid>
		<description>According to Peter Hartcher in today&#039;s SMH, the ALP ought to pack up and go home now: the economy will win Howard the election! Gee Pete, maybe I shouldn&#039;t bother voting if it&#039;s such a fait accompli. 
Seriously, Rudd, Swan and co will need a very credible economic/tax policy, and some concessions to business on Industrial Relations. If that means Gillard and the union hacks of the ALP kick up a stink, so be it. 
Newspoll prediction: ALP:55, Coalition: 45</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Peter Hartcher in today&#8217;s SMH, the ALP ought to pack up and go home now: the economy will win Howard the election! Gee Pete, maybe I shouldn&#8217;t bother voting if it&#8217;s such a fait accompli.<br />
Seriously, Rudd, Swan and co will need a very credible economic/tax policy, and some concessions to business on Industrial Relations. If that means Gillard and the union hacks of the ALP kick up a stink, so be it.<br />
Newspoll prediction: ALP:55, Coalition: 45</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
