<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan: 57.5-42.5</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:38:48 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Curtis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-20107</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-20107</guid>
		<description>Sorry, wrong thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, wrong thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Curtis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-20106</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Curtis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:22:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-20106</guid>
		<description>Martin B,

I believe that Tony Abbott was a member of the Liquor trades Union and of the Australian Journalists Association.  I wouldnâ€™t read too much into it.  Itâ€™s bit like Victorian principals being members of the AEU.  Hardly any of them have any commitment to the principles of unionism, to the principles of their profession or to their classroom â€œcolleaguesâ€, but they still see benefits in being union members.

Bwomofz,

I am quite accepting of being excluded from he more experienced and respected pseph people, but I have already posted more than once my prediction that Labor will pick up 22 seats.  This is not a call, but as the months roll by, it becomes less likely that John Howard can do a miracle, and a miracle is what it will take.  If these figures occurred throughout the lead-up to the 1998 or 1996 or 1983 election, no one would be considering the possibility of a Liberal victory.  Itâ€™s only Mr Howardâ€™s miraculous clawbacks in 2001 and 2004 that make anyone consider him a possibility.


The state breakdowns in Newspoll are for three months and thus have larger samples, which should make them a little more reliable than ACNielsen breakdowns.

Some posters have made absurd statements about terrorist attacks being organised to help with the election, statements so nutty that they do not deserve a response.  I am certainly not part of that conspiraphile group, but I wonder how the news of todayâ€™s ordered release of Dr Haneef on bail by the magistrate and his subsequent incarceration on the ministerial order of Kevin Andrews will play out politically.  Given the evidence so far revealed in the public domain, itâ€™s a big call, even Kafkaesque.  Some may see it helping the government by creating fear in the community.  I think it is more likely to create ridicule and outrage â€“ and not just from the usual suspects.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin B,</p>
<p>I believe that Tony Abbott was a member of the Liquor trades Union and of the Australian Journalists Association.  I wouldnâ€™t read too much into it.  Itâ€™s bit like Victorian principals being members of the AEU.  Hardly any of them have any commitment to the principles of unionism, to the principles of their profession or to their classroom â€œcolleaguesâ€, but they still see benefits in being union members.</p>
<p>Bwomofz,</p>
<p>I am quite accepting of being excluded from he more experienced and respected pseph people, but I have already posted more than once my prediction that Labor will pick up 22 seats.  This is not a call, but as the months roll by, it becomes less likely that John Howard can do a miracle, and a miracle is what it will take.  If these figures occurred throughout the lead-up to the 1998 or 1996 or 1983 election, no one would be considering the possibility of a Liberal victory.  Itâ€™s only Mr Howardâ€™s miraculous clawbacks in 2001 and 2004 that make anyone consider him a possibility.</p>
<p>The state breakdowns in Newspoll are for three months and thus have larger samples, which should make them a little more reliable than ACNielsen breakdowns.</p>
<p>Some posters have made absurd statements about terrorist attacks being organised to help with the election, statements so nutty that they do not deserve a response.  I am certainly not part of that conspiraphile group, but I wonder how the news of todayâ€™s ordered release of Dr Haneef on bail by the magistrate and his subsequent incarceration on the ministerial order of Kevin Andrews will play out politically.  Given the evidence so far revealed in the public domain, itâ€™s a big call, even Kafkaesque.  Some may see it helping the government by creating fear in the community.  I think it is more likely to create ridicule and outrage â€“ and not just from the usual suspects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molotov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-20032</link>
		<dc:creator>Molotov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-20032</guid>
		<description>Woops: Poster should read Posture (as in Latham&#039;s handshake with Howard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woops: Poster should read Posture (as in Latham&#8217;s handshake with Howard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molotov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-20021</link>
		<dc:creator>Molotov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-20021</guid>
		<description>It always seems odd to me that we are here chatting away frantically yet the vast majority of those who will determine the outcome of this election don&#039;t give a rats @rse about politics at all and may well deciede how they vote on the poster of a politician during a handshake or because thats the way their parents always voted or something even more petty!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always seems odd to me that we are here chatting away frantically yet the vast majority of those who will determine the outcome of this election don&#8217;t give a rats @rse about politics at all and may well deciede how they vote on the poster of a politician during a handshake or because thats the way their parents always voted or something even more petty!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trevor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-20002</link>
		<dc:creator>Trevor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 12:33:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-20002</guid>
		<description>What occurred in 2004 with the Libs getting control of the Senate has seen the pendulum go too far one way (which then saw IR Laws bought in which was barely discussed in the election compaign). The people didn&#039;t want Latham but Rudd is a totally different prospective and 2007 will see a correction of the 2004 result. Expect the unexpected. 16 seats are required for government in their own right however if they get either 75, they will still form the government with help of the independents (they will support the ALP as they are the party with the large no of seats even though they may have Coalition tendencies).

Howard won&#039;t go before APEC which means he is locked in for a 2007 election. The people are not listening anymore, even one of my mates who has been a Liberal voter all his life is saying Howard is gone and change of government is likely. The Government is in deep trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What occurred in 2004 with the Libs getting control of the Senate has seen the pendulum go too far one way (which then saw IR Laws bought in which was barely discussed in the election compaign). The people didn&#8217;t want Latham but Rudd is a totally different prospective and 2007 will see a correction of the 2004 result. Expect the unexpected. 16 seats are required for government in their own right however if they get either 75, they will still form the government with help of the independents (they will support the ALP as they are the party with the large no of seats even though they may have Coalition tendencies).</p>
<p>Howard won&#8217;t go before APEC which means he is locked in for a 2007 election. The people are not listening anymore, even one of my mates who has been a Liberal voter all his life is saying Howard is gone and change of government is likely. The Government is in deep trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lomandra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-19966</link>
		<dc:creator>Lomandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 09:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-19966</guid>
		<description>Sawford didn&#039;t include petrol prices, because when he came up with his equation, petrol wasn&#039;t such a huge issue for those on the edge of being able to pay their mortgages, who tend to live some distance from their work. Now it is.

That&#039;s why Costello threatened the petrol companies with the big stick of the ACCC. Suddenly, there is no &quot;weekly discount cycle&quot;. Suddenly, prices are lower.

And don&#039;t imagine for a moment that Costello didn&#039;t know exactly what he was doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sawford didn&#8217;t include petrol prices, because when he came up with his equation, petrol wasn&#8217;t such a huge issue for those on the edge of being able to pay their mortgages, who tend to live some distance from their work. Now it is.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Costello threatened the petrol companies with the big stick of the ACCC. Suddenly, there is no &#8220;weekly discount cycle&#8221;. Suddenly, prices are lower.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t imagine for a moment that Costello didn&#8217;t know exactly what he was doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-19955</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-19955</guid>
		<description>Well of course Steven Kaye I know that Keating&#039;s election was not an endorsement of Paul Keating. Hardly. It was purely a GST win for Labor.
The campaign was very skilful and Hewson did bungle it somewhat. If not for the GST Hewson would have won and probably stayed there for almost as long as John Howard.
I absolutely think Howard may well consider resigning on health grounds after APEC.  Yes he loves being in power but he would hate more than that a humiliating defeat.
It would be easy and even have the electorate feeling sorry for him.
How?  He would suffer &quot;chest pains&quot; after a stressful few days with overseas leaders, be admitted to hospital for observations, stay overnight,and take his doctors&#039; advice to take it easy.
Headlines: &quot;Howard Admitted to Hospital&quot;.  Which doctor can prove whether chest pains are real or not?
Cynical? Politics is cynical and loaded with lies as we have seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course Steven Kaye I know that Keating&#8217;s election was not an endorsement of Paul Keating. Hardly. It was purely a GST win for Labor.<br />
The campaign was very skilful and Hewson did bungle it somewhat. If not for the GST Hewson would have won and probably stayed there for almost as long as John Howard.<br />
I absolutely think Howard may well consider resigning on health grounds after APEC.  Yes he loves being in power but he would hate more than that a humiliating defeat.<br />
It would be easy and even have the electorate feeling sorry for him.<br />
How?  He would suffer &#8220;chest pains&#8221; after a stressful few days with overseas leaders, be admitted to hospital for observations, stay overnight,and take his doctors&#8217; advice to take it easy.<br />
Headlines: &#8220;Howard Admitted to Hospital&#8221;.  Which doctor can prove whether chest pains are real or not?<br />
Cynical? Politics is cynical and loaded with lies as we have seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: STROP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-19949</link>
		<dc:creator>STROP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 08:26:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-19949</guid>
		<description>bmwofoz Says: 

July 15th, 2007 at 1:45 pm 

I understand your point, but I suspect Strop will know I was joking.

Well I was referring to people with sites who have clearly done alot of homework on this subject over some time, Adam etc.  However, I also have a lot of respect for what your average joe (like I am) has to say IF theyve done their homework.  

BMW I havent read you predicting the outcome - must have missed that.   Its all good, and I encourage anyone with sense to have a go at putting up their homework on seats and what they think can/ought to happen with them- If nothing else it kills the boredom whilst we wait for the inevitable.  I dont make a living out of this stuff, thank God, buts it a lot better than watching crap on TV with the populist journo&#039;s churning out dribble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bmwofoz Says: </p>
<p>July 15th, 2007 at 1:45 pm </p>
<p>I understand your point, but I suspect Strop will know I was joking.</p>
<p>Well I was referring to people with sites who have clearly done alot of homework on this subject over some time, Adam etc.  However, I also have a lot of respect for what your average joe (like I am) has to say IF theyve done their homework.  </p>
<p>BMW I havent read you predicting the outcome &#8211; must have missed that.   Its all good, and I encourage anyone with sense to have a go at putting up their homework on seats and what they think can/ought to happen with them- If nothing else it kills the boredom whilst we wait for the inevitable.  I dont make a living out of this stuff, thank God, buts it a lot better than watching crap on TV with the populist journo&#8217;s churning out dribble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmwofoz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-19946</link>
		<dc:creator>bmwofoz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-19946</guid>
		<description>Steven, How can the Polls appear to be writing Howard off, but you think otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steven, How can the Polls appear to be writing Howard off, but you think otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Kaye</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/13/morgan-575-425/comment-page-3/#comment-19944</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 07:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/507#comment-19944</guid>
		<description>Richard Jones, everyone knows (well, they SHOULD know) that Keating&#039;s victory in 1993 was not an endorsement of his leadership or of the Government he led but was instead a rejection of Hewson and his GST. The electorate then waited patiently for another 3 years before beating Keating senseless, punishing him for inflicting &quot;the recession we had to have&quot; upon them.

Another interesting thing about the supposedly mega-popular Hawke - he wasn&#039;t able to secure a swing to Labor in any of the 3 elections he contested as PM. Not one of them. Mr Howard, on the other hand, achieved swings to the Coalition twice in a row, a feat accomplished only twice since the introduction of the 2 party system in 1949.

Now, I highly doubt he&#039;ll be able to do that a 3rd time, but he will win and will then retire in April or May of 2009, after celebrating the 13th anniversary of his first victory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Jones, everyone knows (well, they SHOULD know) that Keating&#8217;s victory in 1993 was not an endorsement of his leadership or of the Government he led but was instead a rejection of Hewson and his GST. The electorate then waited patiently for another 3 years before beating Keating senseless, punishing him for inflicting &#8220;the recession we had to have&#8221; upon them.</p>
<p>Another interesting thing about the supposedly mega-popular Hawke &#8211; he wasn&#8217;t able to secure a swing to Labor in any of the 3 elections he contested as PM. Not one of them. Mr Howard, on the other hand, achieved swings to the Coalition twice in a row, a feat accomplished only twice since the introduction of the 2 party system in 1949.</p>
<p>Now, I highly doubt he&#8217;ll be able to do that a 3rd time, but he will win and will then retire in April or May of 2009, after celebrating the 13th anniversary of his first victory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
