<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Newspoll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:28:21 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bill weller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20148</link>
		<dc:creator>bill weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20148</guid>
		<description>Jasmine i don&#039;t and never would hate anyone. I enjoy your posts and respect your knowledge</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jasmine i don&#8217;t and never would hate anyone. I enjoy your posts and respect your knowledge</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasmine_Anadyr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20143</link>
		<dc:creator>jasmine_Anadyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20143</guid>
		<description>sorry about my spelling a bit worked up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry about my spelling a bit worked up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jasmine_Anadyr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20142</link>
		<dc:creator>jasmine_Anadyr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 09:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20142</guid>
		<description>Oh well here goes and you&#039;ll both hate me but Adam and Bill you are both right, Labor is essentially to thank for the fantastic progress we as a whole society have made on getting rid of stupid and unfair discrimation against homosexuals.   That the Liberals have wedged labor on the word &#039;marriage&#039; and that some rights still just aren&#039;t equal for all people is a disgrace and a great shame to the Labor party.  

In fact the pathetic and either homophobic or political cowardice of the whole &#039;marriage&#039; word position is difficult to understand, and I have tried in more appropriate forums to have it debated but without any true luck.  If ever there was a position lacking substance the marriage word thing is it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well here goes and you&#8217;ll both hate me but Adam and Bill you are both right, Labor is essentially to thank for the fantastic progress we as a whole society have made on getting rid of stupid and unfair discrimation against homosexuals.   That the Liberals have wedged labor on the word &#8216;marriage&#8217; and that some rights still just aren&#8217;t equal for all people is a disgrace and a great shame to the Labor party.  </p>
<p>In fact the pathetic and either homophobic or political cowardice of the whole &#8216;marriage&#8217; word position is difficult to understand, and I have tried in more appropriate forums to have it debated but without any true luck.  If ever there was a position lacking substance the marriage word thing is it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill weller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20132</link>
		<dc:creator>bill weller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20132</guid>
		<description>Adam Says:
July 15th, 2007 at 10:23 pm

Bill Weller in one of his rants above said

Oh Adan i just love it when you have a go its makes me feel that i am hitting a raw nerve. The only thing i have seen changed in the gay culture is that i don&#039;t get bashed or threatened standing up for Gays or Aboriginals like i did 25 years ago. I find it strange the ALP doesn&#039;t give Gays full rights as heterosexuals but when a party is moving to the right i suppose it would be going to far to make EVERYONE equal!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Says:<br />
July 15th, 2007 at 10:23 pm</p>
<p>Bill Weller in one of his rants above said</p>
<p>Oh Adan i just love it when you have a go its makes me feel that i am hitting a raw nerve. The only thing i have seen changed in the gay culture is that i don&#8217;t get bashed or threatened standing up for Gays or Aboriginals like i did 25 years ago. I find it strange the ALP doesn&#8217;t give Gays full rights as heterosexuals but when a party is moving to the right i suppose it would be going to far to make EVERYONE equal!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20103</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20103</guid>
		<description>&quot;the significance of Howard winning in 2001 and 2004 is that it was with increased majorities&quot;

2001 was only *barely* an increased majority. :-)

2004 was certainly a failure, for this reason amongst others. IMO 2001 can plausibly be considered as either a failure by the ALP, or as an election with unusual circumstances.

&quot;he is arguably the most successful PM&quot;

What is unusual about Howard is that he has been more successful in the second half of his tenure than in the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the significance of Howard winning in 2001 and 2004 is that it was with increased majorities&#8221;</p>
<p>2001 was only *barely* an increased majority. <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>2004 was certainly a failure, for this reason amongst others. IMO 2001 can plausibly be considered as either a failure by the ALP, or as an election with unusual circumstances.</p>
<p>&#8220;he is arguably the most successful PM&#8221;</p>
<p>What is unusual about Howard is that he has been more successful in the second half of his tenure than in the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nathan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20096</link>
		<dc:creator>nathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 05:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20096</guid>
		<description>Martin B is right, but the significance of Howard winning in 2001 and 2004 is that it was with increased majorities. Although having a personal dislike for Howard, he is arguably the most successful PM. He is now the second longest serving PM after Menzies, and without the benefit of the DLP. It just goes to show that picking on helpless refugees will always be a vote winner.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin B is right, but the significance of Howard winning in 2001 and 2004 is that it was with increased majorities. Although having a personal dislike for Howard, he is arguably the most successful PM. He is now the second longest serving PM after Menzies, and without the benefit of the DLP. It just goes to show that picking on helpless refugees will always be a vote winner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20067</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20067</guid>
		<description>&quot;Yes, the ALP is in such pressing need of reform - it has only won 20-something state elections in a row and has only leading the federal polls by a mile all year.&quot;

And furthermore, which of the ALP&#039;s failures over the last 15 years or so have really been failures.

There was no surprise in losing 96 - the surprise was winning 93. 
Nor in 98, almost noone thought they could win - but nearly did.

So the ALP&#039;s &#039;terrible&#039; record federally in recent times really comes down to its failure in 2004, with a question mark over 2001, balancing against the Liberal&#039;s real failure in 1993.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yes, the ALP is in such pressing need of reform &#8211; it has only won 20-something state elections in a row and has only leading the federal polls by a mile all year.&#8221;</p>
<p>And furthermore, which of the ALP&#8217;s failures over the last 15 years or so have really been failures.</p>
<p>There was no surprise in losing 96 &#8211; the surprise was winning 93.<br />
Nor in 98, almost noone thought they could win &#8211; but nearly did.</p>
<p>So the ALP&#8217;s &#8216;terrible&#8217; record federally in recent times really comes down to its failure in 2004, with a question mark over 2001, balancing against the Liberal&#8217;s real failure in 1993.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20064</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 01:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20064</guid>
		<description>&quot;With all respect A-C, I cannot believe that people would ever argue that losing an election would bring greater long term success. Silly people were saying that in relation to the ALP in the lead up to the 1998 election&quot;

Nah, this silly person reckons it about the 1990 election :-)

Peacock as PM would have been much less odious than Howard, who would have never got a second shot at the leadership. And Paul Keating would have had 6 years rather than 6 months to broaden his policy focus and gone on to lead a successful multi-term government :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;With all respect A-C, I cannot believe that people would ever argue that losing an election would bring greater long term success. Silly people were saying that in relation to the ALP in the lead up to the 1998 election&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah, this silly person reckons it about the 1990 election <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Peacock as PM would have been much less odious than Howard, who would have never got a second shot at the leadership. And Paul Keating would have had 6 years rather than 6 months to broaden his policy focus and gone on to lead a successful multi-term government <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Molotov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20034</link>
		<dc:creator>Molotov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20034</guid>
		<description>APEC should be really exciting! So many heads of state + rioting in Sydney! All just a matter of weeks before an election is called. What effect will any rioting have? what effect will any police brutality whilest stopping it have (probably not much)? What effects will some brakethrough agreement/ a brakedown in the talks have? Some have mentioned the possibility of a Sydney protocol on CC, how much could this soften anti-Howardism if the media portrays it as being significant? 

And more importantly what &#039;Australian clothes&#039; will the Asia-Pacific delegates be wearing for their photoes together? My bet is those hats with the corks around them. Thongs/ traditonal aboriginal clothes won&#039;t be the image we will promote and i don&#039;t think the government will try anything cutsie like clothes which demonstrate our multiculturalism (they&#039;re phasing that idea out anyway).  

Many of the parties could use APEC to springboard they&#039;re campaign. Remember how last time George was in town the Greens had a bit of fun? Well, he could certainly play a part in their campaign, quite good timing for them, labor could leak. Do you folk agree?

All that just before the election. How can it not be reasonably significant? Personally I can&#039;t wait to see what unfolds during it and what George, Hu and Helen (Hope she has to pronounce the word six again at some time - Chaser I love you) will have to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>APEC should be really exciting! So many heads of state + rioting in Sydney! All just a matter of weeks before an election is called. What effect will any rioting have? what effect will any police brutality whilest stopping it have (probably not much)? What effects will some brakethrough agreement/ a brakedown in the talks have? Some have mentioned the possibility of a Sydney protocol on CC, how much could this soften anti-Howardism if the media portrays it as being significant? </p>
<p>And more importantly what &#8216;Australian clothes&#8217; will the Asia-Pacific delegates be wearing for their photoes together? My bet is those hats with the corks around them. Thongs/ traditonal aboriginal clothes won&#8217;t be the image we will promote and i don&#8217;t think the government will try anything cutsie like clothes which demonstrate our multiculturalism (they&#8217;re phasing that idea out anyway).  </p>
<p>Many of the parties could use APEC to springboard they&#8217;re campaign. Remember how last time George was in town the Greens had a bit of fun? Well, he could certainly play a part in their campaign, quite good timing for them, labor could leak. Do you folk agree?</p>
<p>All that just before the election. How can it not be reasonably significant? Personally I can&#8217;t wait to see what unfolds during it and what George, Hu and Helen (Hope she has to pronounce the word six again at some time &#8211; Chaser I love you) will have to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walsh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2007/07/14/more-newspoll/comment-page-3/#comment-20033</link>
		<dc:creator>David Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 16:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/508#comment-20033</guid>
		<description>Remember people, that when you break down a single poll into separate parts - whether by state or by demographics or whatever - the sample size of each component will be small and the margin of error therefore huge. 

That&#039;s why Newspoll presents its breakdowns not from one poll but from three months worth of polling.

Incidentally, I can&#039;t find the referred to state-by-state breakdown from today&#039;s Nielsen; only the city/rural and age breakdowns linked from The Age&#039;s front page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember people, that when you break down a single poll into separate parts &#8211; whether by state or by demographics or whatever &#8211; the sample size of each component will be small and the margin of error therefore huge. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s why Newspoll presents its breakdowns not from one poll but from three months worth of polling.</p>
<p>Incidentally, I can&#8217;t find the referred to state-by-state breakdown from today&#8217;s Nielsen; only the city/rural and age breakdowns linked from The Age&#8217;s front page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
