Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Burson-Marsteller: minds made up

Not entirely sure what to make of this, but I have received a media release giving results from a Burson-Marsteller survey of 1156 voters conducted on Friday. Respondents were asked if they had firmly decided who they will vote for, to which 77 per cent answered yes. Of that 77 per cent, 56 per cent said they would vote Labor and only 34 per cent would vote Coalition. For the purposes of tying up loose ends, I also note reports on the weekend that an IPSOS Mackay poll indicated that Labor had taken a lead on the question of who would better manage the economy, by 39 per cent to 36 per cent.

166 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All

  1. 151
    Kina
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 1:47 am | Permalink

    Frank Calabrese : I swear it wasn’t me. The embarassment would have been punishment enough for the kid!
    ——————–
    Makes you wonder how the media would be if it were all objective and non-partisan. Never going to happen.

    JOHN Howard once said there would “never, ever” be a GST, and now Kevin Rudd says the only rise in the tax will occur over his dead body.
    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22318535-661,00.html

  2. 152
    paul k
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 1:48 am | Permalink

    Does anyone gives a rats what Milne says. If Howard looses then Milne’s career will be over because the only interview he’ll be able to get in Canberra will be with the new shadow minister for Fisheries.

  3. 153
    Kina
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    There is a new thread up.
    ————–

    Quite frankly everything I read tells me that the longer Howard leaves the election the deeper in trouble he will get. The Adelaide Advertiser started talking about baseball bats.

    “STRUGGLING families are ready to take a baseball bat to John Howard over rising interest rates and believe the Coalition has “lost touch” with the public.”

  4. 154
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 1:54 am | Permalink

    Could someone direct Davey Boy to the comment, somewhere on this site, to cunning stunts?

    It’s past my bedtime.

  5. 155
    Karma Policeman
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 6:03 am | Permalink

    Do you think there are any Coalition parliamentarians who think of Howard nowadays as “a lying c*nt with a limited future”? Now that’s an insult!”

    LOL… that’s probably the most anti-climatic insult ever.

  6. 156
    Don Wigan
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    “WTF?? Explain your slander Just Me???”

    Fear and Loathing, Glen. Fear and Loathing. Surely you haven’t forgotten Hanson, One Nation, racism, xenophobia etc culminating in the Tampa siege and the Pacific Solution. And, of course, the continued internment of Boat People.

    No PM apart from Hughes has seriously ignited such xenophobic fears.

  7. 157
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 8:25 am | Permalink

    The answer to the horse flu issue:

    http://www.pbase.com/wyk/image/8343859

    They did the same at the ‘Gabba in 1928: http://www.justracing.com.au/features.php?news_page=1&artid=1614&catid=100

  8. 158
    Ophuph Hucksake
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    Glen:

    I read “Underground” last November and quite enjoyed it too. The notion of nobody wanting to play the Aussies at cricket except the US Forces was inspired satire – pity Aussie authors don’t excel at this type of writing more often.

    People “nostalgic” for the Joh years in Queensland ought to track down a copy of “Last Drinks” too.

  9. 159
    Ophuph Hucksake
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 8:43 am | Permalink

    PS: “Last Drinks” was another McGahan work.

  10. 160
    fred
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 9:37 am | Permalink

    Member of Parliament making speech: ” Blah blah blah….. I know because I am a country member.”
    Response [allegedly Gough]: “Yes, I remember.”

  11. 161
    J-D
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    103
    Adam Says:
    August 28th, 2007 at 12:08 am
    Can someone tell me in one sentence and words of one syllable what a hedge fund is?

    A pool in which the rich put their cash to work.

    That’s the best I can do (thanks to the miracle of Wikipedia) using only monosyllables.

  12. 162
    Pi
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    “Mr Luntz obviously knows little of Australian political culture.”

    He just doesn’t understand the Westminster system as practiced in Australia. It is, by its nature, adversarial.

  13. 163
    Pi
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    103
    Adam Says:
    August 28th, 2007 at 12:08 am
    Can someone tell me in one sentence and words of one syllable what a hedge fund is?

    Adam, a hedge fund is a managed fund of money that is moved around into different markets (mining companies, gold, currencies, real-estate, investment banking, retail outlets, etc etc) by money managers trying to maximize the profit over short periods of time. It is never designed with the view of cashing in on dividends (a managed return), but to buy an asset (whatever the asset is, share/gold/currency) and sell that asset at a higher price.

  14. 164
    Roy Orbison
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Paul K @ 152

    You reckon he will have THAT much influence?

  15. 165
    Dinsdale Piranha
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Hedge funds are a distilled form of pure greed.

  16. 166
    netvegetable
    Posted Tuesday, August 28, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Adam

    It’s not just an adversarial system, it’s an Australian adversarial system. QT in the House of Commons is astonishingly civilised compared to the Reps. No-one would dream of saying the stuff that gets said in Australian parliaments.

    Could that be because Australian Parliament has more “Questions without notice” ? Possibly it leads to a culture of more adversarial debate?

Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] Show All