Comments on: ACNielsen online poll: 58-42

By: Dario

Dario — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:28:40 +0000

test

By: Dario

Dario — Mon, 01 Oct 2007 02:28:19 +0000

url="test"]test[/url

By: David Charles

David Charles — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:45:29 +0000

#91 Sideline Eye

I am not the former member for Isaacs. I remember that David better as a director of television programmes not as a parliamentarian.

#93 John Withheld

Yes, we read the same pages. There are many repetitive comments on these threads but they are well worth a regular visit because there are a few very knowledgeable and incisive political observers who contribute excellent posts from time to time. I will monitor future threads with interest to see whether you are among those few.

By: John Withheld

John Withheld — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:00:16 +0000

David Charles @ 90, you don’t think opinions are regularly picked apart here? Are we reading the same pages?

By: K David

K David — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:13:55 +0000

I don’t think that the media were kin really ever, every time that ther has been an opportunity to say that the Honeymoon has ended they were onto it, the problem has been that nearly every time they say its evening out and JWH is gaining some ground one of the polls comes out with a 10%+ split.
If Rudd is looking a little run down its probably because he’s been out campaigning since the day he won the caucus ballot, JWH was waiting for the bubble to burst and has now joined the race.

By: Sideline Eye

Sideline Eye — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:11:13 +0000

Dear David Charles,

Please excuse the question without notice, but are you the David Charles, the former member for Isaacs from 1980 to 1990?

By: david charles

david charles — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:31:04 +0000

#84 John Withheld

An interesting remark about your expectation that there be ‘dissection’ of opinions and observations. I think it is fair to say that it is an expectation which is more often than not honoured in the breach on these threads.

By: Mr Squiggle

Mr Squiggle — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:13:05 +0000

Hi David Charles at #77

Very interested in your comments.

I have also sensed something in the last 2 weeks in the way the Ruddster has had a little less gas-in-the-tank with the media than was previously the case.

However, my thought is that the media has now started to more critical of the KR/labor phenonoma.

By: Gippslander

Gippslander — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:13:50 +0000

Chris B says:(a long time ago)
” But I just thought about it. Most of the creationalistâ€™s arenâ€™t allowed to use computers. For example the Exclusive Brethren.”

let’s thank God that Exclusive Brethren aren’t allowed to vote.

Which just goes to show the sample is a little more representative of voters??

By: Chris B

Chris B — Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:48:40 +0000

Its amazing how the headlines want to make something out of nothing this one in the Herald Sun tries to make a point out of a 1% swing to the Liberals. http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22476123-662,00.html
But if you take out the +-3% as the Americans always do and we don’t there is no movement. The Americans always quote the percentage to allow for error as part of every poll. We rarely do.