Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Newspoll: 58-42

Tasmanian reader Econocrat tells of a stunning Newspoll result foreshadowed on tonight’s Lateline: 58-42 to Labor. More to follow …

UPDATE: Kevin Rudd’s lead as preferred prime minister has increased to 50 per cent to 37 per cent. Like the two-party figure, this is a 2 per cent change in either direction from last week. Preliminary reports at Sky News and The Australian.

UPDATE 2: Graphic here, Dennis Shanahan here. Kevin Rudd’s satisfaction rating has recovered three points after a dip last week; the Coalition’s lead on the question of best party to handle the economy has narrowed to 46-37 from 48-33 three weeks ago; its lead on best party to handle national security has unaccountably narrowed from 45-33 to 43-39; and Labor’s leads on education and health have widened considerably. No doubt much of this can be put down to a very Labor-friendly poll sample. Most interesting is a question on strength of voting intention which gives no reason to think the support for Labor might be “soft”.

782 Comments

Pages: « 18 9 [10] 11 1216 » Show All

  1. 451
    Boll
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    We all know Richie doesn`t stir from the (admittedly wide-ranging)possibilities of the white/off-white/cream/ivory or the beige.

  2. 452
    Dangerous
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:41 pm | Permalink

    447 – that’s right! I knew I’d seen him somewhere before…

  3. 453
    Mark
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    BTW The Sydney Institute was where Howard did his “symbolism” speech on Reconciliation and Sol Lebevic (speeling) talked about the “soft” Labor vote and where Hugh Mc Kay said the polls were reflecting Australians waking up from a long sleep.

  4. 454
    The Doctor
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Imacca,
    “What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentation of the women. …”

    That is a quote from the Iliad isn’t it.

    So is Rudd the Trojan Horse??

  5. 455
    Generic Person
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    No 441

    The usual anti-Howard tirade on online blogs is irrelevant.

  6. 456
    barney
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    In the latter years of the Hawke/Keating era Henderson took a course of reasonable pills for a while but like a person brought up as a Jesuit he’s reverted to dogma as he approaches the end of his life.

    And he is probably the most precious commentator I have ever seen. His skin is gossamer thin.

  7. 457
    Hunter
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    Ruddock is the Sith Lord.

  8. 458
    Bluebottle
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    I can’t wait to see how Shanahan spins this 58-42 2PP poll in the GG tomorrow morning.

    Maybe he will do what others have done and try to draw attention away from the actual debate result to the childish shrill of the National Pretenders Club having a la la about the ‘legality’ or otherwise of the worm {BRING BACK THE WORM} and Ray Fartin defending the ‘good name’ of channel eddy or parrot Costellos ‘hole’ in the Swan tax package.

    Anything to distract the punter away from reality and give the GG some hope of flogging a few more ‘gap narrows’ newspapers before election day.

    If JWH can get back from here I will tip my hat to a bloody genius [political] and get very drunk on the Yarra River with my clumsy brother.

  9. 459
    Just Me
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    So is Rudd the Trojan Horse??

    No. Bhuddha, Sun Tzu, and Tintin rolled into one.

  10. 460
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    Bummer :-(

    Not happy Jan!

  11. 461
    Matt
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    Poor William will be hoping for some Narrowing after this…..great polls for the ALP are horrible for his bandwidth.

  12. 462
    RGee
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    The Doctor @ 454 … Close, but no. It’s from Conan the Barbarian.

  13. 463
    Burgey
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    GP @ 421 – I can’t speak for anyone else, but for me it isn’t hubris, it’s that after 11 long years we’ve had 10 months of polls which have given us hope, and now everytime there’s a poll I for one await it with trepidation.

    So when Labor gets good numbers it’s a kind of joyous relief that things haven’t turned like the media have been saying they would.

    I can’t recall Labor having an election campaign poll number this high – ever. Are there records going back to 1983? That might be the only campaign which may have gone close to a number like this.

  14. 464
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    HH one would be a fool to believe the Coalition cannot win from here but one would also be a fool for thinking the Coalition can win if it remains this far behind in the polls i am a realist and i understand it is harder for us to win a 5th term than for Labor to win so the odds are stacked against us and unless Howard can have a radically popular policy on housing then we may be sunk but there will be polls out left right and centre though i would of thought we beat Labor in week one but on first results it appears we did not :(

  15. 465
    Howard Hater
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    Glen, I was genuinely holding out the olive branch to your good self.

  16. 466
    Boll
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:46 pm | Permalink

    Both classic epics though RGee.

  17. 467
    Hugh Briss
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Who keeps talking about me!!!!!!!!??????

  18. 468
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if Kevin is celebrating the good poll result with a vintage bit of ear wax he had saved?

  19. 469
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    HH one would be a fool to believe the Coalition cannot win from here but one would also be a fool for thinking the Coalition can win if it remains this far behind in the polls i am a realist and i understand it is harder for us to win a 5th term than for Labor to win so the odds are stacked against us and unless Howard can have a radically popular policy on housing then we may be sunk but there will be polls out left right and centre though i would of thought we beat Labor in week one but on first results it appears we did not

    Surely you know this should be more than one sentence?

    Currently it is zero sentences because it doesn’t have a full-stop.

  20. 470
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    As someone remarked previously Bolt is repositioning himself with an eye to a viable future. He’s clearly gone soft on the ‘insiders’ – this week fran kelly and the guy from the tele got under my skin a whole lot more

  21. 471
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    I do not doubt your intentions HH there is no doubt it was an olive branch but i refuse to concede the election is lost just yet there is still another 5 weeks and anything can happen but id rather be in your position than mine i am big enough to admit that HH…

  22. 472
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if Kevin is celebrating the good poll result with a vintage bit of ear wax he had saved?

    HAHHAHAHAHAH more ear wax jokes! STOP IT, you are KILLING ME!

  23. 473
    Kina
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    Back to strategy and reality. 5 long weeks to go and polls that will make some panic all over again.

    The way to know what is really going on and, has been said before, is to watch where Kev and PM are canvassing. They wont be wasting time or money during this campaign – what they do has a reason.

  24. 474
    zenk
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    re 433

    Henderson was Howard’s first chief of staff as PM

  25. 475
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    Hunter @ 457 – no, Ruddock and Andrews are Lord Voldemort’s evil twin brothers … and Gerard H is trying out for the part

  26. 476
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Henderson was Howard’s first chief of staff as PM

    I thought that was Graeme Morris?

  27. 477
    paul k
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    What the hell have you got against using commas? You can’t be that poorly educated.

  28. 478
    Mark
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Barney @ 456

    “And he (Henderson) is probably the most precious commentator I have ever seen.”

    Absolutely and once we sack Howard he can get a job at CH 9…as the Worm.

  29. 479
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn why would Rudd crack out the vintage ear wax until he’s won the election…that would be worth a 1998 vintage….

  30. 480
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Just for a note of interest… those imbibing the MOEt, should remember this could actually be 61:39.

  31. 481
    Pancho
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    467 – very good. I also admire Glen’s tenacity and (occasional) good humour.

  32. 482
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    You know when they start talking about ear way that things are horribly desperate….commiserations john

  33. 483
    VoterBoy of Over the Water
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    (Looks up hubris in dictionary…)

    EXAMPLE: When a man who is not yet Prime Minister nor even immediately in line for the post tells the media that he’s not minded to live in the PM’s official residence when he becomes PM because he likes his own garden. (See also, prat, eejit, gutless wonder, etc.)

  34. 484
    Howard Hater
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Glen, you’re a decent guy! And yes, 5 weeks is a long time, we in the ALP are happy but we shouldn’t get too cocky.
    I don’t think I believe this Newspoll: too much of an outlier for my liking.
    The real result will be more like 54:46 or 55:45.

  35. 485
    Kina
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Bolt gave it Kev months ago – though he did sound hopeful when talking up the betting market on the ‘Insiders;.

  36. 486
    Mark
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    I’m pretty sure Henderson was a Speechwriter for the Libs…Generic P?

  37. 487
    Lefty E
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, its hardly hubris. We’ve suffered for this!

    Plus, speaking objectively: Howard deserves to lose, and lose big time. It was his hubris that kept him on when he was clearly past use-by. Plus he’s lowered every single standard of public life, all the way from ministerial accountability to opportunist race-bating.

    Boring old lefty lines, sure, but true.

    And thats the problem with the Faustian pacts he has lived by in office – one day Faust collects.

  38. 488
    nath
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    suck it up tories, we’ve had a dozen years of your miserable politics. so allow us our hubris.

  39. 489
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    “When you got a poisonous weed in your garden you have to get it out right down to the roots….
    Do I sound obsessed?”

    Yeah, but so what, Kina? As a blog warrior you’re sensational.
    —————————–

    “surely $750 for laptops is not the extent of the vision?”

    Don’t miss a trick do you, Eddy? Picked right up on the PC Mr. Rudd was holding in the ad. Great eye for detail, although sometimes you struggle with big picture stuff.

  40. 490
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Poor William will be hoping for some Narrowing after this…..great polls for the ALP are horrible for his bandwidth.

    Indeed, the unanticipated scale of the debate-plus-Newspoll traffic surge has pushed me perilously close to my monthly limit. I have paid for an upgrade but there’s a risk it will not be processed in time. In that case I might be offline for a period tomorrow morning.

  41. 491
    Hunter
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    This challenge to Howard could have happened earlier if Labor had got there act together. We would not have had to put up with 11 years. Political disunity is death. Liberal State parties can testify to that.

  42. 492
    Howard Hater
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    For what it’s worth, if you put the newspoll figures into Antony Green’s calculator, you get:
    106 seats ALP
    42 seats COALITION
    2 seats Independents
    In reality, if Labor is getting anything over 80, that’ll be a good result.

  43. 493
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    I just cannot understand how this worm crap has and will cost the Coalition votes it just really surprises me that Ray Martin who i will never watch again accuses the Liberal Party of censorship i mean for crying out load 9 knew that it was a condition they didnt have the worm and they did it anyway…so much for an uncommitted audience as Rudd only had to say when i travel across this great country of ours and boom up to the atmosphere went the worm. 9 has a lot to answer for and they have unfairly tarnished the Coalition and cost us votes they have some real explaining to do as to why they deliberately targeted the Libs when it was the Press Club who issued the rules…

  44. 494
    Pancho
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Glen, Howard issued the rules not the press club.

  45. 495
    Lefty E
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Tipping in a few coins William.

    You must keep afloat. We need you!

  46. 496
    Generic Person
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    No 487

    Give me a break “Let me speak objectively…” but “Boring old lefty lines, sure, but true”

    Hmmmm. So much for objectivity. I can hear the echoes of Trotsky.

  47. 497
    Ashley
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    JustMe @ 444

    See, I told you not to panic

    That you did. =-)

    Still, I’m glad that Labor has started kicking into gear with advertising and policy announcements. Last week was pretty poor.

    Well, Howard is finished. Last week was the best week he will have in this campaign — by a long shot.

  48. 498
    onimod
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    490 – William – how’s the fiscal forecast; found $30bn down the back of the piano lately?

  49. 499
    nath
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Glen, dont u have any liberal mates? save these rants for your fellow travelers.

  50. 500
    Posted Monday, October 22, 2007 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

    I’m happy for as much hubris as everyone can muster AFTER Rudd wins. Getting carried away 5 weeks out doesn’t achieve anything.

    The best thing about this poll is that it labels Howard a loser who’s best effort (tax policy) simply wasn’t good enough. Nothing less than an outright rejection of the Liberals and the antisocial policies that they have lived by since ‘96 is worth celebrating.

Pages: « 18 9 [10] 11 1216 » Show All