Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Galaxy: 54-46

Today’s News Limited tabloids bring a nationwide Galaxy poll conducted from Friday through to Sunday, showing Labor’s leading increasing to 54-46 from 53-47 a fortnight ago. Sample was 1010; full details available here.

TWO-PARTY PRIMARY
ALP LNP ALP LNP
Nov 4
54 46 45 42
Oct 19
53 47 45 43
Sept 24
56 44 46 40
Aug 27
57 43 47 39
July 30
54 46 44 41
July 2
55 45 46 41
June 4
53 47 44 42
May 14
57 43 49 39
April 23
58 42 49 37

662 Comments

  1. 1
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:15 am | Permalink

    This is wrong! The National Party vote is too low

    :-P

    (Just getting in early)

  2. 2
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:15 am | Permalink

    Line honours? Again, flatlining, time of death yet to be confirmed

  3. 3
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:16 am | Permalink

    damn, had to write something vaguely interesting didnt I

  4. 4
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:19 am | Permalink

    Coming from Galaxy these are pretty good numbers

  5. 5
    Dario
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    With an interest rate rise to come, these are beautiful numbers. This week may well be the ‘R.I.P.’ week for John Howard.

  6. 6
    BenC
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:22 am | Permalink

    It was taken Sat/Sun? No damage from the “Garret Gaffe” then?

  7. 7
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:22 am | Permalink

    According to CM, Coalitions primary has dropped, nothing about Labor’s or minor parties

  8. 8
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    Anything over 53 on election day is a bonus. 54 would be astonishing.

  9. 9
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    Galaxy have been understating Labor’s primary vote for months in comparison to the other major polls. Does anyone know what it is on this occasion?

  10. 10
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    Still we only have to make up 2% on 2PP before the Coalition has a chance at victory we aren’t licked yet!

  11. 11
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:24 am | Permalink

    It was taken Sat/Sun? No damage from the “Garret Gaffe” then?

    The article seemed to imply it was Sat and Sun.

  12. 12
    sondeo
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:25 am | Permalink

    It’s the narrowing……of the Libs chances. !

    Darn I agree ……these are pretty good numbers for the ALP coming from Galaxy. If as reported the Libs Primary vote has dropped that is not good news for the PM. The devil will be in the details.

  13. 13
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    Still we only have to make up 2% on 2PP before the Coalition has a chance at victory we aren’t licked yet!

    And of course the National Party vote is too low. We don’t know what it is at this stage, but whatever figure it is, is too low by 2 or 3%. So really this poll is 50/50.

  14. 14
    blacklight
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    good news

  15. 15
    Crispy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    We’ll probably have to wait until the treeware edition hits the pavement, darn.

    So glad this isn’t a low-flying rogue. My blood pressure likes the steady beat from the Drums of Doom.

  16. 16
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:28 am | Permalink

    On face value good numbers for Labor (though it would be good to have more detail).
    Hard to see where Libs are going to get the 2-3 extra %age points they need between now and Nov 24.

  17. 17
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Poor Glen, only another 20 days of hope left lol.

  18. 18
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Im with you Sondeo, if the coalitions primary has fallen as reported, in a pollster which consistently understates ALP primary in comparison to the others (not sure why, sampling practice maybe?), then there is indeed an existential problem facing this sorry excuse for a government. Puts a smile on my face, for now.

  19. 19
    Drop by
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:29 am | Permalink

    Even if the Coalitions primary vote has dropped, on the TPP figures it wouldn’t be by much and when taking into account MOE it would just be the same old result we have been looking at for quite a while now.

  20. 20
    Mark
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    87 ALP to 61 LNP if the swing is uniform.

  21. 21
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    Let It End there are 20 days between disaster and elation i am hoping for the later of the two but if the former happens then ill be scrambling and pushing my way towards getting into a lifeboat off SS Howard and try to swim to safety.

  22. 22
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:31 am | Permalink

    That 2-3 extra %age points is only what is needed to get them within shouting distance. Not likely to happen given the ammo Labor has to unleash and the interest rate hike that will likely occur.

  23. 23
    Samuel K
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:32 am | Permalink

    “HOWARD STALLS” – good effort from the CM. Maybe Rupert has flicked the switch?

  24. 24
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    Drop by, yes, it’s just the same old result. 60 or so polls in a row.
    As election day gets closer the Liberals’ chances get smaller.

  25. 25
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    Labor is holding fire, apart from the Garrett & Garrett show their discipline is remarkable, when compared to previous elections. Howards been using a jackhammer, and still no wedge.

  26. 26
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    *YAWN*

    It would appear the polls are honing in on a 55 – 45 result.

    Just 24 hours until newspoll

  27. 27
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    What do people make of Howard planning not to attend the Melbourne Cup?

    I hope Rudd goes, just for the big race.

    To me this is another sign of how desperate Howard is – marginal seat campaigning has over taken visiting a major Australian cultural event.

  28. 28
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    Of course this is in the MoE of all the other polls. No change. SS Howard is heading for the rocks.

  29. 29
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:35 am | Permalink

    Glen (21)- you can always seek refugee status aboard the good ship Labor.

  30. 30
    BenC
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    Portland and Centrebet both now have the ALP favourites to win 16 seats. Expect more to firm into favouritism over next few days, especially Page, Deakin, LaTrobe, Bowman

  31. 31
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    I suspect he doesn’t want to be booed or worst seen drinking chardy which celeb while the RBA meets over rates

  32. 32
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    Glen, lol, that’s one way of looking at it, at least your keeping a sense of humour.

  33. 33
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    Howie should campaign in WA, they don’t have a public holiday and its business as usual over there ShowsOn.

  34. 34
    Mark
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:37 am | Permalink

    Glen, will you be swiming to Christmas Island or Nauru?

  35. 35
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:37 am | Permalink

    About the only interesting thing in these numbers is the question, which pollster do ya trust, punk?

  36. 36
    jimmy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    nah we decide who gets on our good ship and under what circumstances they come…

  37. 37
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    Yes, one wonders what the Newspoll will show. Much of the same probably, hopefully slightly better. The better the ALP figures, the more entertaining the “Shana” is.

  38. 38
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    ShowsOn,
    Not sure Howard had that much choice about the Cup. If he went it would not be that good a look, given the state of the campaign.
    What will be fascinating will be to see what spin the Govt tries to put on the interest rate rise (assuming it happens). They’ll have something ready.

  39. 39
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    The only poll numbers I trust are the ones coming out of Anthony’s computer in 20 days time

  40. 40
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    Gary Bruce (28) I think the SS Howard has already hit the rocks and is taking water fast.

  41. 41
    LaborVoter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    Okay first off where does this “Galaxy is understating Labors primary vote” BS come from???

    Take the numbers guys and deal with them, they probably are accurate. Love em or hate em, Galaxy was the closest poll to the actual election outcome last time. Just because you don’t like the results you don’t add a couple of % points for your team… otherwise you fall into the kook world of Glen.

    Secondly it will be interesting to see the effects of the Interest Rate rise. Don’t presume this will benefit Labor, if there is anything you can’t underestimate it’s the stupidity of the average voter.

  42. 42
    Just Me
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    31
    BMWofVictoria Says:
    I suspect he doesn’t want to be booed or worst seen drinking chardy which celeb while the RBA meets over rates.

    And then there is the association with the equine flu fiasco.

  43. 43
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Howard looked terrible and desperate on Insiders today, he won’t be looking any better tomorrow with this result on top of the Bennelong polls.

  44. 44
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Glen, Im sure your advise to the old man might be more helpful than anyone whose actually advising him now. That, or he’s just not listening.

  45. 45
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    Agree with 41, can’t see any reason to distrust Galaxy at all.

  46. 46
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    Gary Bruce (28) I think the SS Howard has already hit the rocks and is taking water fast.

    I posted this youtube link the other day, but it got lost in the great pollbludger meltdown.’

    Speaking of Rats and Sinking Ships – May I present this little ditty by Flash & The Pan.

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=gK4Spx-mCNQ

  47. 47
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    Well.. I could suggest that Glen seeks refuge in the US, but I won’t be that cruel.

  48. 48
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    Galaxy is showing a 6% swing while Newspoll and Nelson are showing 7% and Morgan showing 9%

  49. 49
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:42 am | Permalink

    Galaxy was closest on TPP, not primary. Compare the polls, Galaxy is 3% below Newspoll and AC, 4% below Morgan (but Morgan is just a Menshevik putsch isnt it?)

  50. 50
    Bob from Bonner
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    Considering all,it’s business as usual,my tip,the ALP primary vote is holding up fine,this is another appalling poll for the coalition.
    And,BTW,who says the Nations vote can’t collapse as well.After all,our country cousins have to wake up one day to what’s been happening to them curtesy of the Nationals for the past 15 years.Sooner or later the extent of the betrayal has to become apparent.November 24 may well contain the overdue seeds for the implosion of the NPA.Let’s wait and see.

  51. 51
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    Glen, I must say I admire your loyalty and persistence even in the face of adversity. I don’t know how you find the inspiration to come on here and cop all this carry on. If our positions were reversed I don’t think you’d find me here.

  52. 52
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    I’ll pay that one jimmy (36)

  53. 53
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:43 am | Permalink

    What will be fascinating will be to see what spin the Govt tries to put on the interest rate rise (assuming it happens). They’ll have something ready.

    Howard was at his most desperate on Insiders claiming that it is IMPOSSIBLE to curb inflation, but that the government would be better at it than Labor.

    His inflation combating policies this year haven’t worked very well…

  54. 54
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    Hey if its disaster and defeat id rather go down fighting with a smile on my face anyway if worse comes to worse and we have KR for 6-9 years meh you’ve got to deal with it and hopefully the sky won’t fall in, but with Rooster as Treasurer uggggh!.

    Nevertheless you guys it aint over till its over, its almost over but its not over just yet. It is fair to say if the polls are like this in the second last week into the election ill be checking the emergency drill sheet so i know where the life boats are just in case i need to get off SS Howie. But i still wont concede we’ve lost it just yet. Still im hoping Newspoll bucks the trend and records something from Garrett-gate, if not im pinning my hopes on a brilliant child care or housing policy.

  55. 55
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    Not stating a distrust for Galaxy, just noting the disparity in the primary figures. They do come up with similar TPP to the others though.

  56. 56
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:44 am | Permalink

    The national vote down, well this isn’t hard to believe considering the apparent swing to the ALP in Queensland and northern NSW

  57. 57
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Not stating a distrust for Galaxy, just noting the disparity in the primary figures. They do come up with similar TPP to the others though.

    Well, the cool thing is on election day we finally get to find out which poll company was most accurate.

  58. 58
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    Seriously though, there were some comments by Possum backed up by some real maths that suggested Galaxy is getting the primary about right but underestimating the 2PP.

    Possum, if you’re here.. what was it you said?

  59. 59
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:46 am | Permalink

    But Glen I’m sure just before the meltdown I read you conceed, o dear that post as been last for ever lol : ) ;)

  60. 60
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:47 am | Permalink

    Or something like that.. urgh.. my brain hurts.. my brain hurts..

  61. 61
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    No No Frank its more like this, http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=F54rqDh2mWA :(

  62. 62
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:48 am | Permalink

    Hopefully, on recent figures (without the soft ALP bs) Morgan. Nothing like annihilation to put a smile on ya face. But on current figures, im not picky.

  63. 63
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:49 am | Permalink

    Seriously though, there were some comments by Possum backed up by some real maths that suggested Galaxy is getting the primary about right but underestimating the 2PP.

    Possum, if you’re here.. what was it you said?

    Does Galaxy use the distribution from last election? Or do they ask?

  64. 64
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:49 am | Permalink

    TofK, the word is ‘whomping’ :)

  65. 65
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    Galaxy have been mean on the Labor primary all year in comparison to Newspoll and AC Neilsen. 54/46 for Galaxy is probably 55/45 otherwise.

    In other words basically little change since the begining of the campaign.

    There is still a chance then that Rudd could ‘win’ this campaign and pinch a little extra.

  66. 66
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:50 am | Permalink

    LaborVoter (41) I was simply stating a fact. Galaxy HAS been understating the Labor primary vote in relation to the other major polls since June. Nielsen, Newspoll and Morgan have all had it at 47 – 49%, while except for one month at 47% Galaxy have had it at 44-46%. With the evidence we have seen of push polling from Galaxy in a number of its polls, I know which ones I would have more confidence in.

  67. 67
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    Ill take any word, as long as it equates to the same conclusion: Howard out, Rudd in. No more, please God NO MORE!!!

  68. 68
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:52 am | Permalink

    Well Gary i must say i find it a bit of a downer that my comrades in arms Nostro and Steven Kaye hardly pop up unless we peg back some ground in the polls. But if i didnt post anything eventually you’d be attacking each other, this way you have a Tory punching bag to stop you from attacking LTEP and Adam for some of their views lol.

    Ah BMWofVictoria hopefully that crazy post was lost, but my frustration was warranted how would you feel if you’d written a paper and then the next day someone copied 90% of it and got a higher mark than you, you’d go ballistic like Deputy Dawg and I did lol.

  69. 69
    blacklight
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    hey tofk, three more weeks of near continuous polling to go

    :D

  70. 70
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:53 am | Permalink

    The Coalition’s primary vote is steady on 42 per cent and Labor’s is steady on 45 per cent.
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22702936-601,00.html

  71. 71
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Yes Glen, you are a very entertaining sack to kick. Its like cyber psychiatry, taking out all my pent up grievances on a supporter of the great divider.

  72. 72
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:57 am | Permalink

    [The Coalition’s primary vote is steady on 42 per cent and Labor’s is steady on 45 per cent.
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22702936-601,00.html

    But what is the National Party vote!?

    :-P

  73. 73
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:57 am | Permalink

    Blacklight. In January I was a fervent Chartist, annual elections and all that. Now I am leaning towards 4 year fixed terms. Why? We all know why!

  74. 74
    netvegetable
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    Labor Primary: 45
    Coalition Primary: 42
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22702936-11949,00.html

  75. 75
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    So tomorrow it’s gangbusters over this poll, Tuesday The Cup, Wednesday rates rise, Thursday and Friday rates fallout, and then El Rodente’s reign will enter its last two weeks.

    But Guy Fawkes came early today, bearing not a Big Bang but a Galaxy.

  76. 76
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    Ole Shana’s said ALP primary was steady but it actually rose 1 point to 45. Galaxy always has the lowest ALP primary compared to ALL other polls, including it’s own marginals.

  77. 77
    John Hunt Is A Coward
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    The SMH is reporting another cat out of the bag story. This time the shoe is on the other foot.

    “The ABC’s Peter Cundall has revealed Mr Turnbull told him he hated the pulp mill he approved for Tasmania’s Tamar Valley.”

    I wonder if this will play out in the same MSM and Liberal hyperventilation plus sky will fall in scenario as Janet’s from the GG did with her last best weapon for Libs, the G Force Gaffe.

    Is Turnbull a turncoat for his love of the Kyoto protocol? Is the reality that workchoices will be ditched and Kyoto will be signed but only after an election win, in an about face breaking all Lib promises? You can’t trust those Libs. They are just pretending not to copy ALP policies. Vote Hanson to be safe!

  78. 78
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    Yeah but technically within MOE.

  79. 79
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    I think Shana has jumped ship. At the very least he is manning the lifeboats.
    “But given that voters suggest they could change their mind either way, it is unlikely the Coalition can capture a majority of the undecided voters.”

  80. 80
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:02 am | Permalink

    Yeah but Ackerman wont be jumping off SS Howie until i do, 7:00pm 24th November 2007, if things go sour.

  81. 81
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:03 am | Permalink

    No, that was quintessential Shanaring by the master of denial. *APPLAUSE*, vomits.

  82. 82
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:03 am | Permalink

    Shanahan has an exclusive:

    “Coalition’s seat-by-seat campaign
    Dennis Shanahan, Political editor THE Howard”

    Yes, Shanahan proposes that this election will be won or lost in “seats”.

  83. 83
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    I reckon Ackerman will inhabit the wreck for at least another year if, as is looking probable, the SS Howard is workchoiced

  84. 84
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:05 am | Permalink

    “The ABC’s Peter Cundall has revealed Mr Turnbull told him he hated the pulp mill he approved for Tasmania’s Tamar Valley.”

    I wonder if this will play out in the same MSM and Liberal hyperventilation plus sky will fall in scenario as Janet’s from the GG did with her last best weapon for Libs, the G Force Gaffe.

    I doubt it. The media made a much bigger deal over Garrett’s comments than the revelation that Turnbull wanted Kyoto ratified.

  85. 85
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:06 am | Permalink

    Sleep easy, safe in the knowledge of another sleepless night of worry at Kirribilli.

  86. 86
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Picture on the Front page of the GG.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,5734832,00.jpg

    Any funny captions from Maxine ?

  87. 87
    asanque
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:10 am | Permalink

    Shanahan calls it seat by seat strategy.

    I call it corrupt and morally dishonest pork barrelling.

    The whole of Australian is cheapened by Howard’s political tactics.

  88. 88
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    Labor is committed to using $2.7 billion of the Telstra shares being held in the Future Fund to create a broadband network, opposition finance spokesman Lindsay Tanner says.

    Mr Tanner says Labor is also committed to having the Future Fund at arms length from government.

    "We have made a single commitment to use $2.7 billion worth of those Telstra shares, to shift that amount from one telecommunication investment to another in order to ensure that we get world class broadband in this country," Mr Tanner told Sky News

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Telstra-shares-to-build-broadband-Labor/2007/11/04/1194117868190.html

  89. 89
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    Frank, this one is more appropriate!

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/opinion/animations/0,25199,31,00.html

  90. 90
    John Hunt Is A Coward
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:12 am | Permalink

    Frank 86

    Maxine: My Goodness…No wonder Howard is hard of hearing. Have you seen the 30 year old wax in Howard’s ears?

  91. 91
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:13 am | Permalink

    Peter Garrett on election night.

    “Compadres! It is imperative that we crush the freedom fighters before the start of the rainy season. And remember, a shiny new donkey to whoever brings me the head of Colonel Montoya!”

    “Oh, I mean we’ll implement all our policies”

  92. 92
    codger
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:13 am | Permalink

    Move along please, the harrowing continues; get some sleep Mr. Bowe.

  93. 93
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:14 am | Permalink

    glen – u poor dear – that oh so nice liddle fool is gonna lose ‘cos he’s a caustic liddle a’orifice – glen – maaaaaaaaaaaaate – imbibe some compassion, think NOT just of yourself – try to feel how iraqi citizens might feel after another days (friendly) bombing – mate there’s a number of refugees on inhospitable lumps of coral outcrop you may like to negotiate wiv – but i sus you don’t acknowledge their existence. soooo sad

  94. 94
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    Frank (86) How about – “The dirty old bastard’s got his hand up my skirt”

  95. 95
    vera
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:17 am | Permalink

    I wonder what the mood will be like at Howard’s campaign launch next Sunday (he-he)

  96. 96
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:19 am | Permalink

    Howard’s concession that inflation is unavoidable is perfect evidence that he is gone. We spent the 1980s trying to break inflation, and it was achieved so our economy could grown without becoming inflationary.

    The fact Howard has forgotten the last 20 years of Australian economic history suggests he knows he is gone.

  97. 97
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:20 am | Permalink

    how about – just because hyacinth made me live in kirribili doesn’t mean that ms goulburn is off limits ….

  98. 98
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    Frank (86) Are you going to judge all contributions and award a prize?

  99. 99
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:23 am | Permalink

    Frank (86) Are you going to judge all contributions and award a prize?

    No, just pasted it so we have a bit of light relief :-)

  100. 100
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    According to the poll, only 12% of respondents actually blame the Government for interest rate rises; most cited the booming economy and international factors. Therefore, a rate rise this week will play straight into the PM’s hands, because he won’t be blamed and will be able to point to the risks of electing Krudd and his motley band of cretins and thugs in these economically precarious times.

    And it will work.

    Another interesting finding from the poll – 38% of respondents were not locked behind either major party. Plenty of those will swing behind the Coalition on election day.

  101. 101
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    What will happen in a certain Prime Ministerial Address on the 25th of November :-)

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=KSXJttesBUs

  102. 102
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    ShowsOn Says @ 96

    AND that gave Rudd the best wedge:

    “What I’m stunned by with Mr Howard today is him hauling up the white flag in the fight against inflation by saying it’s unavoidable,” he said.

    “And what I’m stunned by today is Mr Howard owning no responsibility for his Government’s policy when it comes to the five interest rate rises that we’ve seen.”
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/04/2081213.htm

    And for some reason that is still the most popular story on the ABC site.

  103. 103
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:31 am | Permalink

    Therefore, a rate rise this week will play straight into the PM’s hands, because he won’t be blamed and will be able to point to the risks of electing Krudd and his motley band of cretins and thugs in these economically precarious times.

    Did you copy and paste this from the Liberal Party website? Couldn’t you at least provide a link?

    Another interesting finding from the poll - 38% of respondents were not locked behind either major party. Plenty of those will swing behind the Coalition on election day.

    Which will be cancelled out by the same amount who swing to Labor.

  104. 104
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:33 am | Permalink

    Just going back to Galaxy and its trustworthiness. In both the Queensland and Victorian state elections Galaxy produced an early poll showing the parties were pretty much neck and neck. Come polling day in both cases it was a massive victory to Labor.

    There was no reason to believe in either case that such a big shift in voter support towards Labor had actually occurred during the campaign. It was most likely always there and for some mysterious reason Galaxy didn’t pick it up.

  105. 105
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    Glen having to share a lifeboat with Ackerman. Glen, trust me, I wouldn’t wish that on you :)

  106. 106
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:34 am | Permalink

    Glen having to share a lifeboat with Ackerman. Glen, trust me, I wouldn’t wish that on you

    It could be worse, such as an intoxicated Christopher Pearson.

  107. 107
    George
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:35 am | Permalink

    ShowsOn, why bother responding to the obvious Liberal party desperado quoting numbers he doesn’t understand. Concentrate more on preparations for the upcoming party on election night. I know I am!

  108. 108
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:39 am | Permalink

    Glen – Even worse you might have to share a lifeboat with Steven Kaye and he’s going to be in a bad, bad mood..

  109. 109
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    I noticed the last couple of articles by Glen Milne have lost much of their venomn. Wonder if he is hoping for a job with Rudd’s team.

    {A raft of Canberra-based lobbyists and ALP officials also have been sounded out for senior roles in a Rudd government. }

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22701753-953,00.html

    And I loved this:

    {JOHN Howard has refused to say whether he will spend his final years in Parliament on the backbench if his Coalition Government is not returned on November 24.}

    {Mr Howard was again in Sydney yesterday campaigning in his local electorate – something party leaders rarely have to do.}

  110. 110
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:40 am | Permalink

    More likely, we’ll be swimming towards Janet and Andrew who have already got their lifeboat as Turnbull and Costello have already seized the other ones. Something tells me i’ve got a better chance than him.

    What is it with Jurnos being so untidy i mean you have Oakes whose suit pants don’t come past his ankles when he sits down and Ackerman who has to untuck his shirt on national TV???

  111. 111
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:41 am | Permalink

    George, can you recommend a good brand of bubbly?

  112. 112
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:43 am | Permalink

    Here’s the Milne story.

    {JOHN Howard is set to lose his seat at the November 24 election, having failed to make any headway in his northern Sydney seat of Bennelong against star Labor candidate Maxine McKew.}

    {With his political future in doubt, Mr Howard’s Sydney suburban home in Wollstonecraft is being renovated, perhaps in preparation for his return after 11 years of living at harbourside Kirribilli House and The Lodge in Canberra.}

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22697888-953,00.html

  113. 113
    Pi
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:43 am | Permalink

    So… basically… more of the same.

  114. 114
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:47 am | Permalink

    Glen, is this what you think Howard is working on. Good luck!

    {But the shorter term strategy is that Mr Howard is laying some groundwork before an expected interest rate rise on Wednesday, creating a climate – he hopes – where people won’t sheet all the blame for a rise home to the Government, but accept that it is an inevitable result of factors largely beyond the Government’s control.

    It’s a fine line – convincing people that you are the best economic manager and that the economy is strong, while putting doubt in their minds about the future and convincing them that you largely have no control over (and therefore aren’t to blame for) the factors which may lead to a rise in interest rates.

    Mr Howard will know on Wednesday whether he has a safety net for his high-wire act or whether the Reserve Bank makes the walk more dangerous.}

    http://blogs.abc.net.au/thepollvault/2007/11/walking-a-fine-.html#more

  115. 115
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:48 am | Permalink

    Glen – I’m off to bed but thanks for the laughs tonight mate. As Gary Bruce said earlier I don’t know how you do it. But it says a lot for your character that you can laugh at yourself and the situation when it must be so disappointing for you. I don’t know that I could do that.

  116. 116
    George
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:48 am | Permalink

    Mad Cow – most definately. I love French champagne, but with the amount of people coming over on the night, I’d need to max out the credit card to keep everyone happy! I have discovered an absolutely killer French bubbly, Bouvet Ladubay Saphir Brut Vintage, which costs, wait for it $19.99 per bottle. Sold through Nick’s wine merchants here in Melbourne (https://www.nicks.com.au/ProductDetail.aspx?ProductId=478820). If you visit the one in Armadale (High Street) let Nick know I sent you :-) . Although not technically a champagne (sparkling wine from the Loire Valley) it rivals some of the best I’ve had. The wife and I live off this stuff (when I’m not enjoying a nice big Aussie red… or 10).

  117. 117
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:50 am | Permalink

    The last two sets of Neilsen and Newspolls (mid to the end of October) polling 6,015 person confirms Labors primary at 48 and the LNP at 41/2
    I think the reality right now is 55/45

  118. 118
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    Yay! never been drunk in my life.. but if Hockey/Costello/Downer go down, who knows ;)

  119. 119
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    I think that Glen Milne has got his life-jacket on, just in case the lifeboat has got dry-rot in it over the last 12 years and will probably sink too.

  120. 120
    Rx
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:52 am | Permalink

    Maxine will be canonised by Labor if she slays The Rodent in Bennelong. .. Ah, yes, I can hear it now: “Saint Maxine”. Got a nice ring to it, don’t you think?

  121. 121
    Leopold
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:53 am | Permalink

    The Galaxy-bashing on this thread is tiresome.

    1) They don’t do ‘push-polling’, and neither do they engage in what is actually being alleged here, which is intentionally biasing polls. Suggesting they do is just spectacular ignorance.

    2) They have been quite brilliant on major party primaries at every election for 4 years.

    There is a persistent 2-2.5% average difference between the Labor primary in Newspoll/ACN and the Labor primary in Galaxy since mid-year. What that means is difficult to know (truth somewhere in between would be my guess) but accusing Galaxy of having a bad past record and/or being crook is just absurd.

  122. 122
    Just Me
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:54 am | Permalink

    Milne, like a bunch of other media commentators, has blown his credibility with Labor. He has no chance of receiving any favours from them.

  123. 123
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:54 am | Permalink

    Rx (120) She’ll get a ministry if she wins that’s for sure.

  124. 124
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:57 am | Permalink

    {Maxine will be canonised by Labor if she slays The Rodent in Bennelong.}

    Peter Garrett will probably write a song about her. Go the oils! Go Maxine!

  125. 125
    netvegetable
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:00 am | Permalink

    I want to know why this poll doesn’t detect any gains in the Coalition Primary, along with ACNielsen and Newspoll. Doesn’t that make it an outlier?

  126. 126
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    Leopold @121, That difference between Galaxy and the others is still there though, and I’d love to see a rational explanation of it.

  127. 127
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:03 am | Permalink

    “Knowingly misled” = Lie.

    A Pretty strong suggestion in a question.

    Do you agree or disagree that John Howard knowingly
    misled the Australian public when he said that he would
    keep interest rates low?

    Supporters
    Total LNP ALP
    % % %
    Agree……………..42…..14…..64
    Disagree …………49……77…..31
    Uncommitted……..9……..9….. 5

    That is a lot of people thing Howard lied to the people and 14% of Liberal voters.

  128. 128
    Darn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:04 am | Permalink

    Leopold (121)

    “(Galaxy) have been quite brilliant on major party primaries at every election for 4 years”

    Tiresome or not, in my opinion Galaxy have some explaining to do. Yes, they are very good when it really counts and they can’t afford to get it wrong, for the sake of their reputation (like the final poll before the election). But they have produced some real shockers along the way and “brilliant” is not a word I would apply to those performances.

  129. 129
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:07 am | Permalink

    Every time Kevin Rudd gets hit on about Garrett’s gaffe, he should just hand ot a copy of this to each journalist and say, read this the answer is here!

    {HERE’S a serious question that should go to the heart of the federal election: what has happened to truth in government?

    But let’s not beat around the bush: when our government does not tell us the truth, it is not some minor vice, it is a corruption of democracy and it is to be thoroughly reviled.

    But what happens when the information put to voters is flawed? What happens when ballots, at least in part, are cast on the basis of untruths? In short, the elected government’s mandate is compromised. And when that happens the sovereignty of the Australian people is, in some way, usurped.

    Admittedly, very few governments in Australia’s history can claim an unimpeachable record in matters of public honesty. But over the past decade what we have witnessed is a federal government so cavalier in its disregard for public honesty as to reframe the entire issue.

    Perhaps most notable is the extraordinary notion of the non-core promise. To most sentient beings it’s a notion that could have been plucked straight from the pages of a Joseph Heller novel: a marriage of absurdity and moral bankruptcy that would be comic if it weren’t so abject and objectionable. Still, it’s a rather handy political device that has served the present Government to great effect. }

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22624036-5013999,00.html

  130. 130
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:08 am | Permalink

    My feeling is it has to do with Galaxy’s demographic/sampling assumptions.

  131. 131
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:15 am | Permalink

    There is but one quote that sums up this election and my feelings on the polls.

    “Serenity now, insanity later” -Lloyd Braun

  132. 132
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    All elections lead to road promises
    Ben Doherty and Leo Shanahan

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/all-elections-lead-to-road-promises/2007/11/04/1194117879102.html

    I wonder if Leo Shamaham is related to Dennis ??

  133. 133
    John Rocket
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:21 am | Permalink

    okay – late night conspiracy theory time…

    Say I’m the boss of ‘Rocket Pollsters’ it’d be smart for my company to just do an ‘inexpensive’ job with the polls, reduced sample size etc, just cruise with what the others are saying… for 155 weeks of a ‘term’. Seriously, based on what Nielson and Newspoll plus Morgan, ‘Rocket Pollsters’ could do a good enough job. In the final week before election day, ramp it up, employ a few dozen extras, real spend! Do a sample of 10,000 ppl! Really get an accurate number. But suggest publicly, and this is important, that you’ve only sampled 1200 or so… day after election, all kudos to Rocket Pollsters and. more importantly, respect, credibility and all that power for the next 155 weeks…

    Afterall, there’s only one poll that counts…

    Okay, probably outlandish but why the hell not?

  134. 134
    Rx
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:21 am | Permalink

    Maybe after the election a decimated Liberal Party (let’s hope) will have to form a coalition with this mob just to survive ..

    http://www.australianbusinessparty.com.au/

  135. 135
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:25 am | Permalink

    And the Libs blame thbe states foir Haneef.

    Font Size: Decrease Increase Print Page: Print Sean Parnell | November 05, 2007
    IMMIGRATION Minister Kevin Andrews has blamed sub-standard state health services for the reluctance of overseas-trained doctors to work in Australia, rather than his handling of the Haneef affair.

    Amid continuing controversy over the bungled detention of Mohamad Haneef, two medical groups claimed the dispute had caused a 90 per cent reduction in the number of overseas-trained doctors wanting to work in Australia.

    The Overseas and Australian Medical Graduates Association, in a joint statement yesterday with the United Indian Associations, said the backlash would exacerbate staffing shortages.

    "This spells disaster for an already overstretched and under-resourced medical workforce, particularly for rural and regional areas where many of these doctors are posted," OAMGA president Nagamma Prakash said.

    "In the various interviews given by the presidents of UIA and OAMGA to both national and international media, they predicted overseas doctors planning to arrive in Australia would reconsider their decision - they have been proved correct."

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22702747-2702,00.html

  136. 136
    George
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:27 am | Permalink

    Frank @ 135, that’s amazing stuff from the Get Smart of government.

  137. 137
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:37 am | Permalink

    Galaxy has Labor primary votes around 45% compared to 48% from others polling agencies?!? :(

  138. 138
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    frank @137, keep pestering Possum for his explanation of that. Possum won’t talk to me (sob).

  139. 139
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    John Rocket Says @ 133

    If what you say is true and the Galaxy sampling of the minors always seems odd – then the AC Nielsen may be the most accurate reflection of reality during the year.

    Their October polling of 4,000 people – ALP 56/54/55 with primary 47/48/48 means not much has changed; a 1% reduction to 55/45 from September.

    We are still looking at a 55-54 on polling day unless Howard can gets someone to listen to him and, believe him.

  140. 140
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:49 am | Permalink

    I will not blame Howard for the 6th interest rate rise since 2004, on Nov.07.
    But I also don’t give him any credit that he has boasted in the last 11 years on “economic management”

  141. 141
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:49 am | Permalink

    Andrews is mad if he thinks people are not going to connect the Haneef case with this foreign doctor fear of coming to Australia. I guess Andrews will say next that all the doctors not coming are te.rro…ist.s so didn’t want to get caught.

  142. 142
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:52 am | Permalink

    Frank – this is the real big issue now – what Howard claims, what he has done, what real control he has and, if he had a right to make his claims.

    Rudd can make a case that Howard has not been in control of the economy but the economy controlling him and, his claims misleading.

  143. 143
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:57 am | Permalink

    frank. I think (and here is where media bias has more to do with things than any other issue) the majority of people still believe that the Liberal party are better economic managers. I also think its quite likely that a majority of people believe that interest rates aren’t controlled by the government.

    But, none of that matter. A majority of people believe John Howard is an unmitigated liar. And when their own people complain “but the people aren’t listening to us” what they can’t bring themselves to admit is.

    “In the interests of keeping power at any cost, our leader has lied, lied and lied, and his clever lawyer-like ways of avoiding responsibility for those lies has finally become mainstream”.

    If someone repeatedly lies, people stop listening. And that’s the whole basis behind the polls. As Howard said, “its about trust.” Now people just want to see the end of him.

  144. 144
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:57 am | Permalink

    mad cow @ 138 :)
    According to Galaxy, Labor and Coalition primary votes are pretty much close, 45-42 , and Labor has to rely on preference votes to extend its lead :(
    I feel a bit down / nervous on this.

  145. 145
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:58 am | Permalink

    ^when the Liberal Party’s own people..

  146. 146
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:00 am | Permalink

    But Mad Cow one would be wise not to forget Rudd lying to Rosana Harris.
    They are politicians and they all do it, including Mr Rudd. So why focus on Howie all the time if you aren’t prepared to mention Rudd’s failings too.

    All that needs to be said about this election is…

    “Serenity Now, Insanity Later” – Lloyd Braun

    Sleep well ya’ll

  147. 147
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:02 am | Permalink

    frank @144, the major 3rd party is the greens and their preferences are probably going to go 80%+ to labor. Have a look at the polls and the differences between the primary and 2PP. That should explain it.

  148. 148
    mad cow
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:06 am | Permalink

    Glen, I’m not going to bother with that because you’ve had that out with the other parties here and they’ve dealt with it thoroughly.

  149. 149
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:40 am | Permalink

    I have no idea of what Drewsey has been up to, again.

    I am certain, whatever, it is would be near fatal, for him, if not the bystanders.

    Reading on.

  150. 150
    Generic Person
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:02 am | Permalink

    The primary vote certainly looks more realistic for both sides.

  151. 151
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:28 am | Permalink

    looks like the Coalition are going to win after all!

    :lol:

  152. 152
    Gecko
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:59 am | Permalink

    I thinks its going to get worse for the Libs from here. They will implode. Just keep saying “Who do you trust” John. The electorate will answer. 100+ is looking good.

  153. 153
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:22 am | Permalink

    A good result on the whole for Labor, and on the mark for my prediction of 54-46 to Labor in Galaxy. Newspoll will be 56-44 Labor IMO. Last 3 polls, ACN, Morgan f2f and Galaxy, have all had Labor’s 2PP up 1%, so hopefully we get a 4th good poll.

  154. 154
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:52 am | Permalink

    47
    mad cow Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 12:42 am
    Well.. I could suggest that Glen seeks refuge in the US, but I won’t be that cruel.

    No, I grew up there. I can assure you that he would fit in just fine. Send him to Grand Rapids, Michigan. That is just about the most Republican area in the state [my home state] if not the country. It is Gerald Ford’s birth place.

  155. 155
    S
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:56 am | Permalink

    Have you noticed the News Ltd papers have stopped noting 2PP figures and seem to be featuring primary percentages – presumably because the ALP’s figures are below the psychological 50 figure when counted that way?

    Howards screwed – the media aren’t covering the scary economy at the moment, they are covering Howard SAYING its a scary economy and that this is his tactic for the election.

    It’s like the Wizard of Oz, with a pack of reporters pointing to the guy behind the curtain.

  156. 156
    S
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:59 am | Permalink

    PS, pass it on:

    http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/KnowWhereIStand&id=198

  157. 157
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:07 am | Permalink

    Got up to do some work, and lo! A Galaxy to brighten the day!

    And even a number of Glenisms to divert and amuse.

    Looks like more of the same with the added advantage of less and les time for the rat to claw anything back.

  158. 158
    Mad Professor
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:32 am | Permalink

    “Leader fears he will lose power – declares martial law”

    Thought the rodent was playing his final card then realised the headline referred to Pakistan.

    Mind you, desperate times do call for desperate actions

  159. 159
    bryce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:54 am | Permalink

    In 2004 had Howard “knowingly misled the public” on interest rates?
    What sort of question is this? “Knowingly”?
    I could have truthfully answered “No” myself!
    Howard certainly didn’t “Know” interest rates would rise.

    Again, it looks like the phrasing of the questions delivers the outcome desired.

  160. 160
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:56 am | Permalink

    Well who said a week is a long time in politics. One of the team rodent spokesman was singing from a different songbook to Howard not that long ago.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/costello-no-case-for-rate-rise/2007/10/24/1192941125936.html

    Mr Costello said the inflation figure was a "remarkable" achievement given strong economic growth and a tight labour market.

    He said consumers were bearing the brunt of rising food prices because of the drought, but played down concerns that interest rates could rise in the near term. "With this strong investment cycle we are now building additional capacity .... increasing productivity ... in the years ahead," he said.

  161. 161
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:01 am | Permalink

    But by yesterday everything had changed and the rodent tried a different tack.

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/economy/pm-hauls-up-white-flag/2007/11/04/1194117858698.html

    Prime Minister John Howard has effectively conceded an interest rate rise is inevitable this week, saying there are "unavoidable" inflationary pressures in the economy.

  162. 162
    BrissyRod
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:01 am | Permalink

    So people are getting a bit nervous about Labor’s primary vote?

    Don’t worry, there’s always 2010!

  163. 163
    Mad Professor
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    So Steve Price’s missus works for Joe Hockey. Seems ‘rope a dope’ Garret was a set up and he fell for it.

  164. 164
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:07 am | Permalink

    162 LOL

    View from england – we think the Coalition will hold on!

    Could be as big as 10 maj for Coalition….. a long night of disappointment for Labor….

  165. 165
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:11 am | Permalink

    Where the media cheersquad will go after the election.

    http://www.apo.org.au/webboard/comment_results.chtml?filename_num=178505

  166. 166
    BrissyRod
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:12 am | Permalink

    164

    ave it 07…sounds interesting…so you think a repeat of 1969 or perhaps 1980?

  167. 167
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:13 am | Permalink

    BrissyRod – the labor primary has been solid all year, and even in Galaxy has increased sine July. If the newspoll state by state data are to be believed, the likelhood is that the national average is depressed, if anything. Which matters not a jot, since the ALP would win in NSW and Qld alone, with Vic and Tas the icing and SA the bunch of cherries on top.

  168. 168
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:14 am | Permalink

    ave it 07 – you must have been reading the Torygraph.

  169. 169
    VoterBoy of Over the Water
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:16 am | Permalink

    Completely off topic, but you guys over there deserve to be amused…

    I’ve got a number of news clipping binders from previous Federal Elections. I read them when I’m homesick (pity me). If you’ll indulge me, I’ll share with you some snippets from 1972.

    Herald, 7 September: “The federal elections will be held as late as the Prime Minister, Mr McMahon, can possible hold it(sic), the Leader of the Federal Opposition, Mr Whitlam, said today.”

    Australian, 9 Sep; Front page lead headline – “PM gains support” – and in smaller sub-heading “But his national rating is still lagging well behind Whitlam’s”. Author – Alan Ramsay.

    Age 14 Sep: “McMahon may lose seat: poll.”

    Sun 16 Sep: “The Queensland branch of the Liberal Party is having trouble raising funds for the Federal Eloection.”

    Age 26 Sep: “Election odds against Liberals, says Santamaria” (”He did think the Australian political system would work better with only two major parties – one conservative, one middle-of-the road Labor, including the DLP. An amalgam of the DLP and the Country Party seemed less desirable…”

    The Age, 9 Oct. “Lose and it will be long time out, Libs told.”

    (And for Glen … “CP will gain 5 seats: Anthony” – Age, 7 Oct, and “Polls may be wrong, says expert” – Age, 30 Oct)

    More to come, perhaps…

  170. 170
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    VoterBoy – I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. I can only hope Rudd is a student of history. Which he seems, so far, to be.

    Hope the poms are treating you well!

  171. 171
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:27 am | Permalink

    164 For your edification – week three in review from Mark Banisch

    http://www.newmatilda.com/election07/index.php/2007/11/05/week-three-in-review/

  172. 172
    BrissyRod
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:27 am | Permalink

    167

    CL d F – no complaint from me. I stand by my prediction of 79 to ALP.

    Just interested as to the reason why ave it 07 is so sure.

    :)

  173. 173
    VoterBoy of Over the Water
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:36 am | Permalink

    CL de F @ #170.

    I won’t be laughing until the night, but the parallels are slightly eerie. AND by reviewing 72. I get an early glimpse of the last minute desperate dirty tricks that the Libs pull. Mind you, in this election (07), they started much, much earlier.

    Methinks a new slogan for Maxine and the ALP:

    “John Howard: Even More Desperate Than Billy McMahon”

    (And yes, the poms are treating me very well. So long as they pay me in sterling, I’m happy.)

  174. 174
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:41 am | Permalink

    166/172 – we English always call it right!

    More pertinently it is clear that ALP is doing better in seats where it has a remote chance of winning and less in the marginals. As we also know Coalition can win on 48/52.

    And of course the polls in Australia understate coalition just as polls in England underestimate Con and in US underestimate Rep!

  175. 175
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:42 am | Permalink

    The final words of remorse.

    http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/meganomics/index.php/theaustralian/comments/rocky_road_to_higher_interest

    Perhaps Howard and Rudd will greet Wednesday’s expected interest rate rise with a joint mea culpa: Sorry folks, your tax cuts just got wiped out.

  176. 176
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:45 am | Permalink

    Let’s put to bed any notion that any of the four major polling organisations are deliberately biasing their results, as some people seem to be saying. They have too much at stake to want to do that.

  177. 177
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    @41 Labor Voter

    BINGO!

  178. 178
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    Ave it 07 @ 174 has some interesting points. But I think the polling has been too consistent for too long for any of these things to matter.
    I also doubt that the Libs can win with anything below 48 TPP, as some people seem to reckon. Even if some of the “marginals” hold on, there’ll be other seats that do what Lindsay did in ‘96 and jump across the pendulum.

  179. 179
    Rusted on
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:51 am | Permalink

    Oh no Joe
    Please don’t go
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081330.htm?section=justin

  180. 180
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:52 am | Permalink

    I’m warming to the term Krudd.

  181. 181
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:58 am | Permalink

    Hockey and Gillard were going at it on Channel 7 this morning ahead of their debate at the NPC on Wednesday. Hockey lists circumstances under which he will quit Parliament too ;-)

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081330.htm

  182. 182
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    Well with interest rates about to go up things are only going to get worse for the Liberals. Howard really needs to put distance between himself and his interest rate lie from the last election. So far his attempts have been poor:

    I didn’t actually make that promise myself (another lie)
    It is due to drought and high growth (these were present in 2004)

    Lets see if we can help:
    The dog ate my low interest rates
    Its due to the debt we inherited from Labor (oops, we paid it off already)
    Its due to world forces beyond our control (like the low rates were…)
    Who cares, I live in Kiribilli rent free! (hsi favourite; not ours)

    I agree the pol is accurate; there is no reason for any professional pollster to be biased, it is jsut that some use methodologies that favour certain groups. I have more concern about the reporting of results as far as bias goes.

  183. 183
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:00 am | Permalink

    Trust Anna to see through the crap ;-) ….

    “Queensland Premier Anna Bligh says the Federal Government’s $10 billion roads funding promise is a rehash of old policies that have not been delivered.”

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081315.htm

  184. 184
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:04 am | Permalink

    Ave it 07 – as they say in family planning circles, hope isn’t a method.

    VoterBoy – I suspect this is more an inverted 1996 than 1972, but then I distantly remember 1972 was quite a hoot. 1974 less so, 1975 complete disaster. Can’t quite see Ruddie as Gough, though. Or Swan as Jim Cairns. Keep that sterling rolling in, heaven knows we need it for the BoP.

  185. 185
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    “There is but one quote that sums up this election and my feelings on the polls.

    “Serenity now, insanity later” -Lloyd Braun”

    Keep this up, Glen, and Tabitha’s likely to bung on an ugly little demarcation dispute.

  186. 186
    Arbie Jay
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:06 am | Permalink

    Julie

    There will be more libs like Hockey in the last days who suddenly discover integrity and independence and free thought in a desperate bid to save their seat.

  187. 187
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    Arbie Jay – Hockey’s just in the Howard mould – promise anything and worry about it later. Integrity? What’s that?

  188. 188
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:07 am | Permalink

    Preliminary look at Queensland senate seats here.

    http://www.upperhouse.info/ArchiveView.aspx?EntryHeadId=158

  189. 189
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:10 am | Permalink

    178 Why would Hockey be threatening to resign if there were no changes to IR laws planned?

  190. 190
    Dyno
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:14 am | Permalink

    What Hockey’s doing is fairly normal politics I would have thought. Whether or not people believe him, that’s a different matter.

  191. 191
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:15 am | Permalink

    Steve at 186 – a very intersting question.

    And which way ’round does he mean?

    He’ll resign if they make Workchoices more employer-friendly or if they make Workchoices more employee-friendly?

    Why hasn’t he resigned already – I mean they already introduced the fairness test?

  192. 192
    Arbie Jay
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:16 am | Permalink

    CL

    Agree, Hockey has displayed a total lack of integrity so far, especially in the pursuit of Rudd’s wife for political purposes, and more so with his refusal to release the analysis of Work Choices and AWA’s conducted by his own department.

    This plea by Hockey is more like a cry to North Sydney voters, but too little too late and very much like Howards similar plea to voters earlier this year of if you reelect me I promise to be good and behave with integrity this time.

  193. 193
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:18 am | Permalink

    RA @ 188 – with any luck, Hockey won’t have to resign. You co-electors will do it for him.

  194. 194
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:19 am | Permalink

    Arbie Jay – maybe Hockey will also echo Howard’s other promise – re-elect me and I’ll promise to quit …

  195. 195
    Peterc
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    Steven, nice try but I don’t think it will work. The Australian newspaper and polls are rabidly pro government and only trying to neutralise the effect that yet another interest rate rise will have on Howard’s faltering (destroyed?) credibility.

    Using spin to deal with this will be seen for the desperate tactic it it. Successive rises have occurred on Howard’s watch, and has revealed him to be untrustworthy on interest rate matters. Now he is just proving how sneaky he can be too.

    It won’t work.

  196. 196
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:20 am | Permalink

    Yes,CL I think it is best to avoid resignations if at all possible. After all, that was the message from Santo Santoro wasn’t it?

  197. 197
    adrian
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:24 am | Permalink

    BTW, does anyone know what’s happening over at LP?

  198. 198
    Coota Bulldog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    Ave O7 – Polls in England and US can underestimate the conservative vote, because of one simple thing: Non-compulsory voting.

    Strong campaigns by non-Labor parties, such as the Republicans in 2004 to “get out the vote” can influence an outcome and not show up in the preceding polls. Unfortunately, or fortunately, Australians have to vote so you take that possible corruption of the poll system out.

  199. 199
    Sharkbait
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    The Sham at the GG is again trying to polish the turd. He mentions the 45 – 42 primary vote but ignores the 2PP of a huge 54 – 46. He then goes on to repeat the same blatherings about the newspoll in the marginals. Tool!

  200. 200
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:26 am | Permalink

    Adrian, working fine from ozpolitics blog feeds.

  201. 201
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:27 am | Permalink

    He said consumers were bearing the brunt of rising food prices because of the drought,

    This is one of the greatest lies in recent history. The drought IS not increasing food prices. Its Woolies and Coles taking advantage of the drought and the government doesn’t care.

    The fact is farmers are having to wear increased costs because the supermarkets lock in prices a long time ahead.

    Just 2 examples; 1) milk has gone up a lot but the farm gate price hasn’t moved, wheat accounts for about 5% of a loaf of bread. Even if wheat prices doubled the loaf price should only go up 3 or 4 cents. I bake my own bread buying baker’s flour in 20KG bags direct fom the mill. The price a month ago was $0.20/bag higher than what I was paying in early 2006!

  202. 202
    Bobby Horry
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:28 am | Permalink

    The information put forward on interest rates and accompanying responsibility in the Galaxy poll is hardly groundbreaking. Of course people don’t think Howard is solely responsible for the rate rises. However, this hasn’t stopped him from claiming he is the man for the job when interest rates are concerned. Then he claims it is impossible to control inflation. The inability to stay on message is astounding. Just because voters don’t see Howard as responsible for the rate rises, doesn’t mean they will flock to him if the rates increase on Tuesday. The same applies for Rudd. Howard has handled this so poorly that he has almost painted the picture for voters that the economy is something that cannot be managed by any party.

  203. 203
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    adrian, they’ve been down since Saturday evening.

  204. 204
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    EC

    http://larvatusprodeo.net/2007/11/05/5305/

  205. 205
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    The interest rate finding in Galaxy is – interesting! The inevitable rate rise tomorrow may not give Labor the boost they were hoping for. Howard’s new fear campaign that Labor won’t be able to manage the coming economic turbulence won’t get traction either. If there is a big international downturn, we cop it no matter who is in power here.

  206. 206
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:34 am | Permalink

    ‘The national Party vote is too Low. ” The national party is as low as you can get. They stand for nothing now, are a blister on the ar*e of Australia and a growth that has attached itself to the Liberals.

    They have less ticker then Tip and stand for nothing. The sooner they are gone from the Australian political scene the better Australia will be.

  207. 207
    Arbie Jay
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    CL

    Hockey would not have made such a silly promise if he didn’t realise he was a big risk to lose his seat.

    I would say he is gone and knows it, that is why the desperate last minute plea.

  208. 208
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    Sorry Mayoferal but food prices HAVE gone up because of the drought, quite substantially in the case of grains, fruit and vegetables. The other factor is that world grain prices have risen because of world food shortages caused by increasing demand from China and India, and the diversion of grain crops into biofuels. And it’s going to get worse. At the moment, meat prices are lower than they could be, because farmers are selling off stock they can’t afford to feed.

    On another matter – it’s a clever stunt for Hockey to threaten to resign as minister if workChoices is changed. The simple way around that would be for Howard (if he wins) to give Hockey a different portfolio, and let another minister do the dirty work.

    And on the Galaxy poll – pretty consistent with all the others. I’m with Possum – another interest rate rise will send more votes Labor’s way.

  209. 209
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:44 am | Permalink

    I think Hockey knows that Getup are now targetting him personally as the second “birthday” of worckchoices approaches…

    Getup are promising to park an anti-workchoices billboard in front of Hockey’s office in (very prominent) Pacific Highway if enough people sign the Sticky-Note petitiion….

    http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/KnowWhereIStand&id=198

  210. 210
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:45 am | Permalink

    Steve, thanks for the link, but still can’t connect with LP. Maybe it’s my SE Qld ISP.

  211. 211
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    Rates

    Done

    also sent to about 50 contacts

    Suggest everyone else does same

    Could get to 500000 by days end

    hehehe

  212. 212
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    ps it was 12000 at 8.48
    now is over 13000 at 8.53

    wo people power at work

  213. 213
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    cynic, thanks very much..

  214. 214
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:10 am | Permalink

    Get those rates up!

    Its good for savers, old people etc!

  215. 215
    Andrew
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    its a real shame for this board that there cannot be decent, intelligent debate. Why is every conservative supporter hear incapable of anything but rash statements without substance?

    For example, Steven Kaye, the undecided voters youre now using as straw to clutch on, are split 50/50 in terms of the way they’re leaning. There is no way Howard would be able to swing enough of them, and he may actually lose some leaning his way.

    Instead of fantasy, how about some thoughts about what Howard could do to turn it around because it AINT going to magically change no matter how hard you dream

  216. 216
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:12 am | Permalink

    209 Howards been doing that for twelve years. He calls increasing rates good economic management.

  217. 217
    Spiros
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:17 am | Permalink

    Howard’s attempt to turn the interest rate rise in his favour will fail. It would only have a sniff of a chance if the voters didn’t trust Rudd with the economy. But if that were true, he wouldn’t be so far in front in the shadows of the election.

    A more likely outcome of the interest rate rise is the voters will say to Howard, “you promised us low interest rates, and all we’ve had since the last election is interest rates going up. And we’re going to punish you for it.”

  218. 218
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:22 am | Permalink

    What about when banks raise mortgage rates 35bp in response to the 25bp RBA hike?

    Given the much higher cost of funding globally this is a very realy possibility.

    This is what Costello was worried about a couple of weeks ago. I don’t know whether it will happen or not, but it’s a very very real chance.

    I don’t think that the actual 35 instead of 25 will actually help either party, but if it happens then everyone will reply the dopey things Costello said about it. And it will make Costello look impotent.

    I think the rate raise will help the ALP, but only for these secondary reasons.

  219. 219
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    sorry, REPLAY the dopey things…

  220. 220
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    Interest rate rise will help Howard, not Krudd. Because people will realise that even with six interest rate rises this term they remain at historical lows and if Labor were in charge they would rise much more.

    This poll allocated 70% of minor party preferences to Labor, so the true 2pp from this figure is more likely to be 53/47 than 54/46. And remember Howard will probably win with 47.5% of the two-party preferred vote due to electoral mechanics.

    A very good and encouraging poll result that does nothing to change my prediction of a Howard win.

  221. 221
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:25 am | Permalink

    215 – you call the future!

    Remember Ave it says Howard win!

  222. 222
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:26 am | Permalink

    “Forget the polls. Look at the betting markets. They get it right every single time.”

    Nostradamus, 12.12.06

  223. 223
    Ashley
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:29 am | Permalink

    Snakeboy @ 217

    Touche.

  224. 224
    ND
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    Nostradamus, there is a rather uncanny correlation between rising interest rates and the rising ALP primary & 2PP. This rubbish about interest rates not helping Labor is just that.

  225. 225
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Another interesting finding from the poll - 38% of respondents were not locked behind either major party. Plenty of those will swing behind the Coalition on election day.

    It has been an hour or two since I read the poll but I think 22% of people said they were still completely undecided. In most polling I have seen a 3% swing to the Coalition about a week before elections I would suggest that 3% is in the undecided. If so it will be a close race.

  226. 226
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    This is because the past few miniscule interest rises happened at the same time as the “Oh No!” initial knee-jerk reaction to WorkChoices. If you take that away, it would not have helped Labor at all, but much the reverse.

  227. 227
    wysiwyg
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:33 am | Permalink

    Nostradamus @ 215 : “Howard will probably win with 47.5% of the two-party preferred vote due to electoral mechanics”

    You’re either joking or dreaming …

  228. 228
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:34 am | Permalink

    217 – I love your work Snakeboy.

  229. 229
    Rx
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    even with six interest rate rises this term they remain at historical lows

    As a matter of fact, Australian interest rates are the highest in more than a decade, and the second highest in the industrialised world.

    Funny isn’t it. Labor left downward-trending rates to the incoming Liberal government. Now the Liberals will leave rising rates to (what hopefully will be) the incoming Labor government.

  230. 230
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:40 am | Permalink

    14000 as at 9.35

  231. 231
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Re Joe Hokey-Pokey’s latest gambit to keep his snout in the troff, is his promise in the same league as Abbott’s prior to the 2004 election on the Medicare Safetynet rates???

    http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/content/2005/s1345647.htm

    To politics now, and just six months after the election, the government has ditched what was once a cast-iron guarantee of its campaign. The once-immutable threshold of the Medicare safety net has been revised up. It is a significant change to one of the central planks of the government's health policy. As foreshadowed on the 7:30 Report last night, the government has moved to rein in the ballooning costs of the scheme by lifting the safety net threshold from $300 to $500 for poorer families and from $700 to $1,000 for everyone else. The Prime Minister says the change was needed to maintain the program's sustainability.

  232. 232
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:42 am | Permalink

    The problem with running a coutnry like a CEO runs a company is that the CEO runs down the investment then leaves while things still look good. Everyone loves him at his new company…

    The problem with Government is that you have to stay – until you can’t anymore….

  233. 233
    Hugh Briss
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    The Howard Holden is bogged in the soggy spot where the septic tank overflows. The family has been pushing as best they could but have sprayed with fetid mud from John maddly spinning the wheels. The old station waggon is down to the axles now and not moving anywhere.
    Oh look! its uncle Graeme Morris.He’ll know what to do!
    “John its easy . what we will do we’ll pretend its a ship and sail her to victory”

  234. 234
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    I find it interesting that Howard has now changed tack on interest rates, Galaxy pumps out a poll showing the government is not being blamed, Lebovic is on air telling anyone who will listen that this could favour the government and the media is more interested in the poll that talks about who people blame than who they are going to vote for. There is a message in there somewhere.

  235. 235
    Rx
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    Possum overlays Opposition primary votes on Interest Payments to Disposable Income

    http://possumcomitatus.wordpress.com/2007/05/24/why-howard-is-rooted-in-one-simple-graph/

  236. 236
    mytym
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    A couple of points worth noting:

    Whether or not the galaxy polling is biased or not is beside the point. All it means is that you cannot compare Galaxy to the other polls. Instead compare it to previous Galaxy polls. Do this and you will see that the ALP primary is steady and the coalition primary fell since the last one. On 2pp ALP increased it’s lead slighlty. Bad sign for the government with less than 3 weeks to go.

    The interest rate question in the Galaxy poll stands for nothing. It is absurd to think that Howard knew that interest rates would go up, so of course he didn’t Deliberately mislead the electorate on this matter. However he did mislead the electorate by convincing them that he had some control over the movement of interest rates in that time. Had Galaxy structured the question differently it would have produced a very different and more meaningful outcome.

    Most likely you will only a 1 or 2 % rise in ALP primary as a result of another dreaded interest rate rise on Wednesday, but that’s not because people don’t hold Howard responsible for making a completely dishonest promise last election. It is because of the <20% of swinging voters out there, most have already decided to vote ALP as result prior to the announcement. If you need proof, just look at the polls.

    Same thing goes for a lot of the other issues throughout the year that are expected to give one party a boost over the other. These issues predominately draw reactions out of voters who are already opposed to the offending party. They can’t lose their vote because they never had it in the first place!

  237. 237
    ND
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Getting back to this poll, it is interesting to note the difference in the spin between the Courier Mail and the Daily Telegraph. The Courier Mail reckons the poll shows that Howards campaign has stalled whilst the Tele emphasises the: People don’t Blame Howard for rising rates thing. Even if people don’t blame Howard for rising rates, it certainly takes the sheen away from his economic credentials – which were/are his big vote winner.

  238. 238
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    On interest rates: The Galaxy poll seems to show us that a lot of people realise that interest rates are not something the government controls much. Howard, of course, claims credit when rates go south, but defers responsibility when they go north. The Galaxy data support this – not that many people think Howard is to blame (only 12%), but 42% think he lied. Thus, when rates go up, not many will think Howard is to blame, but a lot will believe he has no say in it, no say in it at all. Which means they won’t believe he can do any better than Rudd.

    And Nostradamus, if you actually believe that tripe you spout, that’s your business. You’ve only got a little while now before the misery is over.

  239. 239
    Evan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Snakeboy at 217. That’s a very specific quatrain from Nostro you’ve quoted there. He seems to have forgotten writing it. Must be all that nutmeg he’s smoking.

  240. 240
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    # 233 – Dead right, CL. The Rodent’s big problem with interest rates is about perception, not reality.

    The reality is that the government doesn’t control interest rates.

    The perception is that Howard promised he’d stop them going up.

  241. 241
    TheSkip
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Lead story from Skynews this morning – Voters wont blame Howard for an increase in a rate rise and ends with a by line latest Galaxy poll shows Coalition has not improved their position and are still on 46% on 2PP.
    Oh the face of politics – it was Keating’s policies which caused interest rate rises in 90-92 but the drought, oil prices and (dont mention the war!) which caused the rises in 04-07- dont blame me!

  242. 242
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    First up can somebody tell me how the TPP vote is arrived at in polls. I ask this because Labors primary vote is much higher than last election which suggests they will get a smaller % of the preference vote this time.

    Second, I think a major error most polls have is that they do not take into account the sitting member. I remember seeing a TT or ACA story about Mal Brough where a street poll was done asking voting intentions. Most people according to the show believed it was time for a change yet were still going to vote for Mal.

  243. 243
    bryce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    Socrates and Alex, the interest rate questions in Galaxy is:
    “Do you agree or disagree that John Howard knowingly
    misled the Australian public when he said that he would
    keep interest rates low? ”

    If you asked the first question without the “knowingly”, the answer, according to other research and anecdotally, would be overwhelmingly, yes.

    Why include “knowingly”, when just the question ‘…did Howard mislead…’ would address the issue precisely?
    In a word – to mislead.
    The question now becomes two questions in one, with one being ‘did he mislead’ and the other – was it ‘knowingly’.
    But the response option was polar!
    For respondents it was all or nothing. Both elements had to be ‘yes’ or both ‘no’.
    A logical dilemma for the respondent.
    Not a good look if you want a genuine answer. But this was known by the designer of this carefully crafted question.
    If you think ‘knowingly’ is more important, you’ll answer ‘no’. If you think ‘mislead’ is more important, you’ll answer yes.
    The result – a dilution of the ‘yes’ option.
    The question has done its job!

    This is a known (and pretty obvious) deception in qualitative polling but it worked beautifully this morning when the opening line from Tony Eastly on AM quoted that “49% say Howard did not mislead”. He DIDN”T report the question as it was stated. He was sucked in well and good. You’d think someone like him would be more politically savvy. But there you go. (Or was it Coalition bias at the ABC, ha)

    Galaxy have done it again.

  244. 244
    Andrew
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    Oh Steven, if youre relying on the science of TT or ACA, youre stuffed. But i guess that’s what it’s like to clutch at straws

  245. 245
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    No I am not relying on the science of TT/ACA I was just using it as an example. There are going to be a number of people who vote for the member rather than the party. These people may not be many but would be enough in marginal seats to determine who wins government.

  246. 246
    Jenny
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    Re the Nationals, I wonder if the shift in non-metropolitan votes might be the sleeper in this campaign. Have a look at Possum’s tables on http://possumcomitatus.wordpress.com/2007/11/01/bring-out-your-dead/

    These have the combined Newspolls showing an average swing of 6.8% against the coalition in non-metropolitan areas and 15.0% towards Labor. Obviously a lot of that shift will be wasted because the Nationals hold several of their rural seats by big margins, but it looks like the beginning of the end for the Nats as they are now. My impression is that country people have been onto global warming for a long time and are getting increasingly anxious and impatient with pollies who are still in denial.

  247. 247
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    Incumbents generally get a personal vote.

    This favours the Coalition.

  248. 248
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:19 am | Permalink

    Most people will probably think Howard can’t do much about rates either way. Some will think it’s all his fault. The ones who realise he isn’t responsible may also put two and two together and work out he’s not responsible for the good times, either. The ones who think he is responsible will dislike him for it. Either way, most of these two groups will have another reason to ditch the libs. Which is worth another point or two in the polls for labor. If Sky and the News papers want to believe their own propaganda, so be it. The galaxy poll provides some evidence that the punters are more sophisticated on these matters than we often give them credit for!

  249. 249
    Megan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    GetUp-15,000 votes

  250. 250
    Alan H
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    I hope this table shows ok. To aid understanding of statements of the relative accuracy of the various pollsters, here is a table showing the actual pre-election final polls of each of the big four, compared to the 2004 election. (from Bryan at Oz Politics)

    ACNielsen Galaxy Newspoll Morgan 2004 Election
    Poll date 5-7 Oct 5-6 Oct 6-7 Oct 7-8 Oct 9 Oct 2004
    % Prim Coalition vote 49 46 45 45.5 46.7
    % Primary Labor vote 37 39 39 38.5 37.6
    % Total maj party prim 86 85 84 84 84.3
    % Residual primary 14 15 16 16 15.7
    % TPP Coalition vote 54 52 50 49 52.7
    % TPP Labor vote 46 48 50 51 47.3
    % residl to Coalition 36 40 31 22 38.6
    % residual to Labor 64 60 69 78 61.4
    Sample size 2029 1200 2500 1311 Very Large

    As can be seen the Morgan and Newspoll primaries were just as close a Galaxy, within rounding, but they both got the minor parties preference split wrong, in Morgan’s case, spectacularly so. AC Nielsen got the coalition primary wrong. Saying that Galaxy have a better handle on primaries in their recent polls than the others is not supportable. The noticeable difference lately is that Galaxy have a 2% lower primary for Labor than ACN and Newspoll, and about a 1% higher Coalition Primary vote, and that Galaxy consistently record a much higher vote for the Greens than the others (8% + for Galaxy, about 6% for NewsP and Morgan, and 4% for ACN). All of them are now being very careful with allocation of minor party prefs, but their differing proportions of these can still produce significant differences in TPP estimates.

    cheers,

    Alan H

  251. 251
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:22 am | Permalink

    15k at 10.20

    Cool

    http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/KnowWhereIStand&id=198

    50k by 12 (heres hoping)

  252. 252
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Stephen – “There are going to be a number of people who vote for the member rather than the party.”
    Fair enough I can agree with this statement.
    “These people may not be many but would be enough in marginal seats to determine who wins government.”
    I can also agree with “These people may not be many..” But I cannot see how you can conclude from this that “..but would be enough in marginal seats to determine who wins government.” That is a big leap into the unknown, No evidence there.

  253. 253
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    If I remember what I read at Ozpolitics a considerable time back, the last two elections the galaxy poll got the 2PP spot on or close as possible to the eventual end result three weeks out from the election. We’re approximately three weeks out so if the trend continues its looking good for the ALP.

    I have to agree the Nationals are a do nothing group of individuals as a whole and are only attached to the Liberals for political survival but in some cases that’s been good for those in Nationals electorates. If you really wish to dislodge them, you need to run high-profile independents in their seats which presents 3 problems – 1. where do you get them from? 2. Its going to cost $50 000 minimum each and 3. They will be up against a party machine with megabucks behind them.

    For those that like to display data in blog comments, I believe its possible to use simple HTML to display tables

  254. 254
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Did anyone see the story on this “Coffee Bean Poll” in Perth?

    http://abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/04/2081133.htm?site=elections/federal/2007

    At first I thought it was silly but with a sample of 30,000+ customer visits, and coffee being one of those universal goods consumed by people who vote for any party, I am not surpised by the claimed accuracy. To me the only risk this time is that the WA trend is different to the rest of the nation.

  255. 255
    Evan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    Ave it 07 says: “Incumbents generally get a personal vote.

    This favours the Coalition.”

    They also get tarred with the brush, which is why we see just about every sitting Coalition MHR trying to put as much light between themselves and the Government as possible, to the point of even leaving Liberal Party logos and photos of the PM off their campaign literature.

    It’s also why Hockey is feverishly attempting to distance himself from whatever Minchin has planned as Workchoices Mark 2.

    Once it gets to the “don’t-blame-me-I’m-nothing-to-do-with-the-Government” stage, the goose is pretty-well cooked, wouldn’t you say?

  256. 256
    Diogenes of Sinope
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    At least its stopped everyone talking about Peter Garrett. If I was the professional punter (moron) who put $100 000 on the Rodent at $2.20 just before APEC saying “With APEC, everyone will realise how well respected Howard is by the leaders of the world and his odds will shorten to be favourite. Then I’ll put $100 000 on Rudd at $2.20. I cant lose!”. Well mate, good luck.

  257. 257
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Gary,

    I have been involved in a few polls in the past and this is what I have found. When asked which party people would vote for on average 1/3 go for each major party leaving 1/3 for minors and undecided. However when asked which candidate they would vote for the sitting member usually gets another 3-4% of the vote which comes out of the undecided. 3-4% may not seem like much but is enough to keep Howard in government.

  258. 258
    Ave it 07
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    All – Coalition rules ok :lol:

    Off to bed in England! See you later

  259. 259
    LaborVoter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Why doesn’t the GUTLESS Joe Hockey promise to quit parliment and the Liberal Party if Workchoices is made tougher???

    This sounds very much like the “Brian Burke” stunt, where one of their front benchers was caught out as having dinner with Brian Burke, so they sent him to the backbench as punishment. WHAT A JOKE.

  260. 260
    Doug
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    The coalition advantage in incumbency is somewhat reduced as there are a sginficant number of government MPs retiring at this election. Open seats (those without an incumbent include: Page, Lindsay, Leichardt, Forde, Makin, Cook, Grey, Mitchell. Flynn as a new seat has no incumbent.

    A couple of those are ultra safe Coalition seats.

    There may be others that don’t come immediately to mind where there is a retiring Government member.

  261. 261
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Fadden is another with a retiring MP.

  262. 262
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    ALP @ $1.31 on Centrebet. Coalition @ $3.50

    This is the point in proceedings where the big, smart money starts coming in. If there’s no significant movement in these odds in the next seven days, it’s goodnight nurse.

  263. 263
    Ashley
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Rudd unveils $150m plan for homeless

    http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=312807

    Watch as Rudd makes Howard look like the selfish sod that he is. This plays right to the core of the issues that many people have with this government: that it’s all about the economy, and if you get screwed over too bad.

    The other issue (probably more powerful) is Labor’s pledge to lift foreign aid to 0.5% of GDP. This is a significant issue amongst committed Christians (who might otherwise vote for the Coalition). I suspect Rudd is pulling a large Christian vote on the basis of his better social policies.

    Stand-by for a me-too by Howard on the foreign aid thing. Hillsong is now pushing Labor’s line to try and force the government the match it. The Make Poverty History group is actively targeting marginal seats as well. It won’t surprise me if Howard rolls over after 11 years… he will do anything to try and win.

    Damn it is going to be satisfying when he loses.

  264. 264
    Diogenes of Sinope
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    An Australian election first! Dolly is going to debate Pat Conlon, the SA Minister for Transport. The first time a Federal Minister has debated a State Minister in election history. Clutch at those straws!!
    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22702345-5006301,00.html

  265. 265
    Ashley
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Snakeboy Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 10:52 am

    ALP @ $1.31 on Centrebet. Coalition @ $3.50

    This is the point in proceedings where the big, smart money starts coming in. If there’s no significant movement in these odds in the next seven days, it’s goodnight nurse.

    There will be a move in the odds, but it will be towards Labor. Nobody backing the Coalition at this stage could seriously be called “smart money” IMO. More like “idiot-tax” money.

  266. 266
    Lindsay voter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    The homeless announcement is brilliant.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22704036-12377,00.html

  267. 267
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    If Rudd becomes PM at the end of this month, then it has been a long, long time to hear something like this from a national leader:

    On Labor’s new homelessness initiative:

    “This is all part of reaching out with a helping hand to Australians in need. It is part and parcel of our Australian set of values, having a bit of heart and soul and doing the right thing for all those Australians out there who have run into one of life’s walls.”

    After nearly 12 years of Howard, you’d almost be forgiven for no longer knowing what compassion is.

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/rudd-helping-hand-for-homeless/2007/11/05/1194117920644.html

  268. 268
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    “Why doesn’t the GUTLESS Joe Hockey promise to quit parliment and the Liberal Party if Workchoices is made tougher???”

    Because it is another Howard-style trick. The most likely case is that if the government is returned, ministerial portfolios will be re-shuffelled and Hockey won’t be Workplace Relations minister. Therefore, if WorkChoices is made tougher, Hockey will simply say, “Well, I’m not the minister anymore. Take it up with the new minister.”

  269. 269
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    250 Stephen – I have closely followed elections for many years and what I have noticed is when the swing is and it is large even long standing sitting members can be swept away. There is no certainty incumbancy will save them.

  270. 270
    Kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    The local candidate factor only comes into play if they are high profile and active and make themselves well known and ‘liked’ in the community which, is not many.

    Many people don’t even know who their local MP is.

    Interest rate question is interesting because suggest that half the population don’t believe Howard has control of interest rates [and that he knew he didn't when making promises].

    *Howard still has responsibility to the public – for making the promise which was the core of his 2004 election campaign. Rudd will run this.

    *Rudd’s assertion that Howard has run up the white flag on rates will now resonate as Howard washes his hands of having control of rates [now that they are going up].

    *Rudd runs the good message of investing in education etc keeps inflation down.

    * Howard thus losing bite on his main and only platform on economics and rates.

    I wonder which way undecideds broke in 1996 and 1998 – the last unadulterated elections where change was on the way.

  271. 271
    Ozymandias
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Socrates @ 248 -Miss Maud’s Coffee Bean Poll is well-established in WA and from memory its results have been pretty accurate -for the last three federal elections. For those who don’t know, Miss Maud’s has very good coffee -but more expensive than most cafes. The cakes are splendid, and I believe it is these that attract large numbers of cake-eating tories, hence the poll has a strong Tory bias. Yer average Aussie blue collar bloke wouldn’t be seen dead at Miss Maud’s.

  272. 272
    Ashley
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    This is exactly the kind of policy Rudd needs to release.

    The pollies seem to have become obsessed with releasing money, not policies. So it’s always the X Billion Dollar Whatever Policy. People get bored with the amount money being thrown around.

    Far better to release some policies that really get people talking and steal the agenda. Good policy isn’t purely about money, obviously, but the way election campaigns are run you’d think it was.

    I hope Rudd has a few more of this type of policy up his sleeve. Not only is it good policy, but it makes Howard look bad, and Howard can’t even attack it. Furthermore, it demonstrates new and strong leadership from Rudd.

    Genius.

  273. 273
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    This policy looks very good, I know many people who work closely with the homeless and the frustration they feel towards the Howard Govt has been growing most of these people live in nice safe Liberal seats (ouch)

    While no Govt can eliminate poverty you do need to ask the question as Rudd does, how can we have such a booming economy yet so many miss out.

    I’m sorry but this Govt has lived off the Economy and a slack lazy ALP for a 11 years and it has now been forced to give a justification on why it should be returned and all it can come up with is

    “UNION”

    While strictly speaking Howard can’t be blaimed for the rise in Interest rates, anymore than he can claim credit that Mr Business has hired someone.

    Lets go one step further when the Govt says so many jobs have been created how many of those jobs are actually new or simplly a person going from one job to another.

    Costello is right Howard isn’t that good at Economy management.

  274. 274
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    I think Howard might be a victim of his own rhetoric in thinking he would be better able to handle the economy in a rising interest rate and high inflation environment. While he has shown genius in getting both to rise, he has no track record in making either fall. His pork barreling tax cuts are a major reason for the inflation.

  275. 275
    Dr Good
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    The minority of voters who know who their local member is
    are also usually able to say which party they belong to.

    Thus if a survey asks them “which party are you going to vote for”
    then they will take account of their knowledge before answering the
    question, and their answer will match their actual vote for
    a candidate on election day.

    The majority of people don’t know who their local member is and
    will also answer the voting question correctly, because they
    will end up looking at party affiliation on the ballot paper.

  276. 276
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Rudd is making Howard look silly in regard to inflation and interest rates. Howard changes with the wind. Not a good look.

  277. 277
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    The local member factor is important more in te country seats then city, but in Landslide Elections this becomes less of a factor lets take the 2002 Victorian State Election several high profile good local Liberals in safe seats were beaten

  278. 278
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    I think its easier to know how your area votes than who the local MP is, this is partly because there are so many members of Parliament and with such regular changes to the seat boundaries.

  279. 279
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    forget the polls, ask the punters:

    SportingBet: 1.32 / 3.3
    CentreBet: 1.31 / 3.3
    BetFair: 1.37 / 3.6
    LasseterSport: 1.28 / 3.7
    PortlandBet: 1.3 / 3.5
    SportsBet: 1.28 / 3.7
    Iasbet: 1.37 / 3.25
    SportsAcumen: 1.28 / 3.7

    And for RBA interest rate decision on Wed.,
    BetFair offers: NoChange: $1.14 / Raise.25: $7.6

  280. 280
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    I’m still waiting for Howard’s king hit knock ‘em down and drag ‘em out housing affordability package. I have no doubt that it will also be a triumph for rising inflation and interest rates just like his first day of the election tax cut genius.

  281. 281
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Two quick points.

    1. While the punters might not blame Howard for inflation, and hence interest rates, this is not the point of objection.

    The point is that Howard said he could keep them down. He shouldn’t have said it. It was irresponsible, reckless and utterly deceptive. The same punters who now are cranky with 5 interest rate rises since 2004 are cranky at him for trying to swindle them.

    2. Since when has Joe Hockey EVER known what up-and-coming IR policies were in the pipeline? Remember the “Safety Net”? He didn’t have clue about it. Why should he change the habit of a political lifetime now? And why should Howard start telling him anything? Hockey has been on a suicide mission dressed up as a glorious counter-attack since he became minister for IR… and he doesn’t realise it (but soon will).

  282. 282
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    269, Or take the great Beattieslide of 17 Feb 2001, when the Libs were reduced to only 3 seats, with Labor demolishing Lib strongholds in Brisbane, and on the Gold and Sunshine Coasts. Or the two last NT elections, where the CLP lost a huge number of seats in both, despite the electorates being much smaller (~5000) than for Federal electorates.

  283. 283
    Tristan Jones
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    The Galaxy polls have not showed much change in the Coalition or Labor’s primary vote over the last few months, The Coalition in the low 40’s and Labor in the mid 40’s. Unless the polls change Labor is going to win the election with a big swing of between 5-7%.

  284. 284
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    The Queensland Liberals now have eight members in parliament and not a clue or tactic between them. A four all factional split is all that keeps them from imploding… well until after the Federal election anyway when the member for Clayfield will challenge Fleegg’s leadership.

  285. 285
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    204
    Rates Analyst Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 8:44 am
    I think Hockey knows that Getup are now targetting him personally as the second “birthday” of worckchoices approaches…

    Getup are promising to park an anti-workchoices billboard in front of Hockey’s office in (very prominent) Pacific Highway if enough people sign the Sticky-Note petitiion….

    http://www.getup.org.au/campaign/KnowWhereIStand&id=198

    Thanks much for that :) :) …. I just signed my note and forwarded the message to about 8 of my friends and relatives ;-)

  286. 286
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    frank frederic – so ‘no change to interest rates’ is a clear favourite? That’s surprising.

  287. 287
    RGee
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    FF @ 271
    “BetFair offers: NoChange: $1.14 / Raise.25: $7.6″

    What?!? Surely that is the wrong way around?

  288. 288
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    The govt was able to scrape by in 1998 because the marginal seat holders were just elected, and the govt had an advantage. Now, with Labor’s primary way up, that advantage has disappeared. After 11 years, they’ve already reaped as much advantage from their marginals as they’re going to get. The Newspoll shows a 7% swing against the govt in their own marginals, even though it includes Wentworth, Boothby and Bennelong, which may, for various reasons, have a below-average swing.

  289. 289
    Burgey
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Lord D @ 280 – not only that, as Possum has pointed out, the difference in 1998 was the coalition got so many One Nation preferences.

  290. 290
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    210 Andrew and Steven Kaye,

    Speaking of undecided voters, I recall reading somewhere earlier this morning (can’t find link at the moment) that 20% of the Galaxy voters in this poll were supposedly “undecided”. I know that Antony said over the weekend that historically, it is the case that undecideds break 2 to 1 in the favor of whatever the current polling trend is. That means that if the 20% is accurate and history holds true this time, Rudd will get 2/3 of those 20% or a bit over 13% of the 20%. That won’t help the coalition. They are done and dusted.

  291. 291
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    sorry RGee, GaryBruce and all :)
    my bad :(
    yes, it’s the other way around:
    NoChange: $7.6
    Raise.25: $1.14

  292. 292
    Arbie Jay
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    Howard says he can’t control inflation which causes higher interest rate, then where is this experience they talk about.

    As usual Howard blames other factors for his failings, the drought and oil prices.

    Inflation is caused by rising prices, the government can do something about that. Howard and ACCC boss Samuel are on record as saying there is nothing wromg with a business seeking to maximise its profits.

    As Mayo pointed out the big two Coles and Woolies are making record profits as are many other companies, an effective ACCC may have been able to keep a lid on these rising prices and inflation.

    The drought, well back in 2002 Beattie asked for Federal help to buy out Cubbie Station, this would have released billions of litres of water for farming, but Howard rejected Beattie. Pity, we still have Cubbie but you can’t eat cotton.
    Bracks also asked for Federal assistance for pipelines in Victoria to pipe water to farm areas, knocked back by Howard unless the pipelines were privatised. Pity, the fruit and vegetable basin in Victora may well have had more water for irrigation.
    In 2004 the states asked Howard for a national water policy on water to buy out licenses and manage water better, rejected again until Howard came up with his back of the envelope plan earlier this year.

    Oil prices, can’t do much about them but you can about the petrol prices. ACCC is holding an inquiry now into petrol pricing, this after years of people saying that the concentration of petrol retailing into the hands of the two majors, Woolies and Coles was forcing prices up, especially with the use of the shop a docket vouchers. Pity we didn’t have an inquiry earlier and had to wait for an election, maybe we would have lower petrol prices, lower inflation and lower interest rates.

    Howard also abolished the maximum wholesale price cap on petrol that had been in place for years and now the oil campanies are making record profits,. Pity, maybe keeping the cap would have kept inflation low.

    Howard also put a 62% tariff on imported ethanol, this benefited Howards close friend and liberal party donor Onan, who produces ethanol himself. Pity, cheaper ethanol would have meant cheaper petrol and lower inflation.

    Keatings plans for super included raising it from 9% to 15%, if Howard had continued with this plan wage increases would have been traded off for the super increase. Pity, it would have meant less pressure on inflation and interest rates.

    Plenty Howard could have done to control prices, inflation and interest rates, he and Costello justed needed to get off their ar*es and do something for once.

  293. 293
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    A message to the farmers from their representative in cuckoo land.

    http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/interest-rate-hike-not-inevitable-vaile/20070305-184l.html

  294. 294
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Money has started to come in for Labor in individual seats now.

    http://jackman.stanford.edu/blog/

    The 76 seats for Labor is up from 74, which was where it was the last few weeks.

    The expected Labor seat count is also well up now.

  295. 295
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Can someone send this to Mark Vaile with an explanation of what the National Party policies have caused?

    http://www.asx.com.au/sfe/targetratetracker.htm

  296. 296
    Alexm
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:18 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps there’s a connection between the low numbers in the Galaxy poll who would blame the government for an interest rate rise and the apparent disconnect between the consistent primary and 2PP figures and the question about managing the economy.
    Maybe the punters really do realise that the government hasn’t got much hope of controlling the economy anyway, so they’re basing their vote on other things, like social and foreign policy.

  297. 297
    Kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    Well if the undecided 20% do break 2/1 towards the trend then Labors vote will increase a little.

  298. 298
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    Once the National Party in Canberra would have been fighting to keep petrol and diesel prices low for farmers. Now they just sit there timewasting and allow whatever Howard wants to happen. I think they might be in for a nasty surprise on election night. Country people have never taken too kindly to bludgers.

  299. 299
    vera
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    I was almost moved to tears reading about Rudd (bless him) making his announcement to help the homeless and less well off. Makes you feel all warm inside.
    Hopefully very soon now, say in 3 weeks, I’ll no longer be ashamed of my nationality and will be able to stop pretending I’m a Kiwi!

  300. 300
    Tory Crimes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    198-Dont both countries also have the unfairest voing system around in first-past-the post? In the UK its working in Labours favour at the moment but they really should have changed it to a preferential system when they had the chance. It would have kept the Tories out for generations.

  301. 301
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Announcing money for homeless accommodation is only of benefit to the homeless. How many homeless people were going to vote for the Coalition?

    Krudd is really an electoral buffoon.

  302. 302
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Caroline Overton had a hilarious piece in the GG this morning. Apparently poor old imre salanuski (sp?) is suffering from Stockholm syndrome due to the fact that he’s hung out on the Labor Campaign bus for the last few days and now thinks Labor will win. Presumably shes implying that the Labor party are akin to political terrorists – which I suppose would accord with the perspective of the rag she writes for.

    But hold on, brave and noble Caroline is not going to run off with those bad boys from the labor party – nor worry herself with the avalanche of polling predicting a landslide for Labor. No – the Garret gaffe, reflecting as it does Hubris in the Labor camp means that Labors lead is about to crumble and little johnny will just hang on.

    With incisive analysis like this why would anyone consult possum. And to think she’s won two Walkleys. Journalism in oz really is at an all time low.

  303. 303
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    301 Nosrils, talking of buffoons have we had any explanation from the coalition why the household debt to savings ratio is negative and has been since 2001?

  304. 304
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    Announcing money for homeless accommodation is only of benefit to the homeless. How many homeless people were going to vote for the Coalition?

    Bahahahahah!!! Oh Nostro!

  305. 305
    Asanque
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus

    Maybe he was just feeling sorry for John Howard when he gets evicted from Kirribilli.

  306. 306
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Asanque Howard does own his own home, so he wouldn’t be homeless.

    SERENITY NOW!

  307. 307
    Diogenes of Sinope
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    New Moss Report just released showing free speech and democracy have reached an all time low under the Ratking. Evidently, if the Ratking doesnt like it, it didnt happen.
    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,22704172-5006301,00.html

  308. 308
    Ozymandias
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus, I can tell your political views are deeply rooted.

  309. 309
    Peachy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Announcing money for homeless accommodation is only of benefit to the homeless. How many homeless people were going to vote for the Coalition?

    Krudd is really an electoral buffoon.

    This kind of comment really shows you where Howard and his supporters are coming from. It perfectly typifies the kind of Australia that JH has sought to create – a culture of pure greed and complete disregard for anyone else.

    Maybe, just maybe, there ARE still a few decent people left out there Nostrodamus, who now realise what a heartless, evil, manipulative little creep Howard really is.

  310. 310
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Nostrils get a look at this for great economic management.

    http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/mf/5202.0?OpenDocument

  311. 311
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Nostra give a good insight into the psychology of a coalition supporter. Presumably the ‘whats in it for me’ mindset can’t comprehend why Rudd would bother helping the homeless when they already vote for him. Onya Nostra you poor sod. Some people who are well of actually like to help out the poor. Ever heard of that one. They live in seats like wentworth, northsydney and bennelong funnily enough…

  312. 312
    frank frederic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Hockey told the Seven Network: “I will resign as a minister in the Howard Government if there are any SUBSTANTIAL changes or any of the changes that Julia Gillard has just flagged,”

    The last part is confusing. Does Hockey say that he will resign from politic / government if Coalition loses the election?! There will be a by-election at Hockey’s electorate if Coalition loses but Hockey clings on?

    Also, the trick is in “SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES”, if Coalition wins, Hockey would argue any Coalition change to WorkChoice is NOT substantial and hence stays on. Business as usual. But that will be irrelevant because Coalition’s gonna to lose the election.

  313. 313
    EdenMonaro Resi
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Coffee bean poll also being run by another big east coast chain. At my local and one other is showed a big pro-ALP count in the jar. Now if that aint science….. :)

  314. 314
    Asanque
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus:

    Yes, and its been vacant for a long time.
    However, Howard is now renovating it.
    Guess he knows he’ll need it soon.

  315. 315
    Econocrat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Looks like Turncoat could be in hot water again:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081726.htm

  316. 316
    alister
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    frank frederick @ 312:

    Note that Hockey says that he will “resign as a minister in the Howard Government”, rather than, say the Costello government. This is just more sneaky language from the bloke who lives next door to Howard – he’s learned from his neighbour.

    But I agree that the Libs are utterly stuffed, and it’s been hilarious reading the comments of the people who think they’re in with a chance. It’s 1996, people, except the names of the parties have been reversed.

  317. 317
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    “Krudd really is an electoral buffoon.”

    That must explain why the ALP have a rock solid 47% Primary vote.

    Got your money on yet, Nostro?

  318. 318
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps penalising the homeless a bit more, like more strict rules on begging, would (1) make the place safer for the ordinary person and (2) discourage being homeless, i.e. make them actually not waste their welfare payments and do some work.

  319. 319
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    # 315 – That’s fantastic. And Peter Cundall is a journalist who enjoys an excellent reputation.

  320. 320
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    315 The Garrett v Turnbull debate might see the pair of them turn up an hour late if this keeps up, Econocrat.

  321. 321
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    301
    Nostradamus Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 12:40 pm
    Announcing money for homeless accommodation is only of benefit to the homeless. How many homeless people were going to vote for the Coalition?

    Krudd is really an electoral buffoon.

    You wouldn’t feel the same if YOU were out on the streets. This was, always has been and always will be, the Labor way. Take care of everyone, including those who can’t take care of themselves. We must, as a kind and decent society, look after those who aren’t as well off as ourselves. Libs have never been on that ship and never will be. I challenge you to spend 24 hours living on the streets and then come back and rubbish our next Prime Minister for taking care of the homeless.

  322. 322
    Pappinbarra Fox
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    People (mainly Liberals) are making the wrong comparison on interest rates. Do not compare with historical rates – compare with similar economies now! What you find is that interest rates in Aus are right up there at or near the top. Ask why is that so? Then look at the $A and our balance of trade. Now are you getting the picture?

  323. 323
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    301@Nostradamus

    The homeless may not vote for the Liberals, but what about all those who work in Health, Community, Social, Emergency,Financial and Legal fields that work bring them into contact with the Homeless and others who appear to have missed out on the Economic boom.

    I know many of these people and they mostly live in Liberal Party seats, many don’t belong to Unions, many are fed up with Howard’s failure to Goven, Rudd’s policy will play very nicely with this lot.

  324. 324
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Julie if this is such an issue for Labor why is it such a problem if we’ve had State Labor Governments in this past decade?

    Why should the federal government waste money on the homeless when the States and Local Councils should be dealing with it?

    Serenity NOW!

  325. 325
    Liz
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Helping out homeless people helps me, Nostro, by making my community a better and nicer place to live.

  326. 326
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Nostra, you’re one sick puppy. If Rudd’s homeless policy is as silly as you say, we’ll find out in due course. Happily, it looks like the sort of nonsensical drivel you spout will stop resonating once Howard’s gone. An event which draws closer by the day.

  327. 327
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Lets compare the following responses,

    Nostro slags policy

    Glen makes sensible point about the total and utter failure of the state govts to deal with these issue.

    I wonder which is the more intelligent comeback.

  328. 328
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 324,

    You can go out on the streets with Nostradamus and then come back and tell us what you thought of it. Any Liberal who wants to trash this policy, take a reality check and come back to report how it was. Labor will always take care of those less well off. This is a huge vote winner :) :)

    And until you spend 24 hours on the streets, you have no right to complain whatsoever

  329. 329
    Crispy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    First ‘Bastard Boys’, now ‘Gardening Australia’. The ABC can’t help itself.

    I think Nostrils has returned to his favourite hobby: winding us up. Let’s not waste too much bandwidth. Nice to see you back for the death throes, Nostra.

  330. 330
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Julie all im saying is when’s the last time we’ve heard State Labor Premiers talking about the homeless = never.

    So if this is such a really important policy area for the ALP, Mr Rudd is but a recent convert as his State counter parts obviously haven’t thought it a big enough issue to spend multi-million dollar sums of money on the problem, or asking the Commonwealth for assistance?

  331. 331
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    324 It is a Federal Government responsibility through SAAP funding. Which has been cut to shreds by the Howard regime. Rent Assistance has risen only $8.00 during the life of the Howard Government – no wonder there are so many homeless people.

    http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/bb8db737e2af84b8ca2571780015701e/DE6A64FB4A7A7F38CA2570DE0008B499?opendocument

  332. 332
    mytym
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    If you want to know what the general feeling of the electorate is, look no further than who is in power in every state. The majority of whom won their most recent election in overwhelming landslides despite voters being less than satisfied with their performances previous.

  333. 333
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Ever heard of the Commonwealth State Housing Agreement ?

  334. 334
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    liz, it’s not about you.

  335. 335
    barney
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    nostradamus @ 3 301

    This post demonstrates the absolute barrenness of a political ideology which sees political decisions exclusively through the prism of the winning of the next election. It is this short term practice which has been the hallmark of the rodent’s reign. Howard is incapable of seeing beyond the gaining of any short term political gain, beyong the winning of the next election. His political biography reflects his view that it is the political game that is of supreme importance. There is no end beyond that. It is why the emperor has no clothes and why the coming electoral cataclysm will be of biblical proportions.

  336. 336
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    # 328 – Julie, unfortunately, twenty four hours on the streets in Mosman is called “a night out”.

  337. 337
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    331
    steve Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
    324 It is a Federal Government responsibility through SAAP funding. Which has been cut to shreds by the Howard regime. Rent Assistance has risen only $8.00 during the life of the Howard Government – no wonder there are so many homeless people.

    http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/bb8db737e2af84b8ca2571780015701e/DE6A64FB4A7A7F38CA2570DE0008B499?opendocument

    Thanks for finding the evidence, Steve. I knew it was there somewhere. I don’t know the ins and outs of government as much as some of you who grew up with it :) :).

    Nice to see we will have some compassion back in the Lodge for awhile :) :):)

  338. 338
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Julie all im saying is when’s the last time we’ve heard State Labor Premiers talking about the homeless = never.

    Wrong. Mike Rann had a policy of reducing homelessness at the last S.A. election.

  339. 339
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    But how much had he talked about it before the election?

    How many times has Rudd mentioned the homeless before the election = 0.

  340. 340
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Cundall should spread his allegations through “The Gardening Show”. Would go right into the soft underbelly of Liberal support.

    Far more effective than the angry ramblings of Steve price on a radio station that no one listens to.

    When the flowerpots turn against you, things are really crook!

  341. 341
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Cundall is a lefty though GG.

  342. 342
    Ozymandias
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Good link, Steve. I found out I’m $112 a fortnight worse off than I was in ‘96. I clearly recall during the 96 campaign that Howard was asked about rumours that he planned to cut rent assistance programmes. He denied it. He said he’d keep the rate the same. Then about a week after he got elected, he raised the threshhold, effectively cutting the payment rate. This was the first time I realised just how weasel-wordy he could be.

  343. 343
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Agree with GG. Rann flipped so fast on water restrictions in SA when the gardeners rebelled y9ou wouldnt believe it.

  344. 344
    John Hunt Is A Coward
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    alister 316

    Re Hockey guarantee WorkChoices won’t “SUBSTANTIALLY” change and if it does he will resign. Well that is no guarantee at all for working people because there is no guarantee Mr Shrek will be in the same portfolio little own a minister in the next parliament if the Libs win.

    Howard might just put in a more accommodating person like Minchin, Abbott, Nelson, Bishop or Ruddock into the IR portfolio. So much for no change…

  345. 345
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    But how much had he talked about it before the election?

    Rann talked about it a lot, because there was a dispute over renovating an area of the city where emergency housing is. Rann’s argument was that the emergency housing was more important than letting investors capitalise on the sky rocketing land values.

  346. 346
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    330 [Julie all im saying is when’s the last time we’ve heard State Labor Premiers talking about the homeless = never.]

    Ever wonder why the state premiers win so convincingly Glen? It’s because they talk about these sort of issues regularly. Perhaps you don’t quite understand what people mean when they say the Liberals are out of touch. Your comment is a good example of how out of touch Liberals really are at present.

  347. 347
    adrian
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Hockey had learnt much from his boss re weasel words. The key offender of course being the word ’substantially’.
    If enough people are stupid enough to vote for this bunch of devious incompetent bastards, then they deserve all that they will indoubtedly get.

  348. 348
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Ever wonder why the state premiers win so convincingly Glen? It’s because they talk about these sort of issues regularly. Perhaps you don’t quite understand what people mean when they say the Liberals are out of touch. Your comment is a good example of how out of touch Liberals really are at present.

    Well, to be fair, the S.A. opposition leader talks alot about water security. See his ’solution’ is to double water rates for EVERYONE, excluding farms and businesses. :-P

  349. 349
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Glen and Nostradamus, how do you sleep at night. I repeat my observation that Republican voters have almost three times as many nightmares as Democrat voters (International Conference for the Study of Dreams July 2001). Thats the only time when your dark souls cannot control your consciences.

  350. 350
    Timbo
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    They’ll just change everything once elected Hahahahahaha
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081726.htm

  351. 351
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Goodness gracious me Glen,

    Now you want to mount a Liberal smear campaign against a popular celebrity gardener.

    Who is next, “The Wiggles”?

    Time to get over yourself, me thinks.

  352. 352
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    [They’ll just change everything once elected Hahahahahaha
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081726.htm

    This story kind of sucks though, it will increase the chance of Turnbull winning Wentworth. :-(

  353. 353
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Snakeboy,

    336
    Snakeboy Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 1:26 pm
    # 328 – Julie, unfortunately, twenty four hours on the streets in Mosman is called “a night out”.

    Will take your word for it ;-) . I grew up in America so don’t know what Mosman and other similar areas are like ;-) .

    The gist of the message still stands though. For those who are critical enough to throw “proverbial stones” at Rudd for wanting to take care of those less well off, they should take their place there for awhile and see if they aren’t pleased when the shoe is on the other foot, that someone is taking care of them. If they’ve been evicted because they can’t make ends meet, they ought to know that in spite of their previous hard nosed anti Labor policies, if they are caught out on the streets, we would still take care of them. No one asks who you vote for when you show up at a shelter looking for a hot meal.

    Take this one for an example of someone whom Rudd’s policies would help. This is a cut and paste from an open letter on Julia Gillards MySpace website. {I’ve removed all of the identifying details just to be on the safe side}

    *****

    Dear Ms Gillard,

    I write to you to ask for help.
    I am a [**] year old single parent of two adult children. My eldest child [*******] is [**] years old and is intellectually disabled. He is a client of [***********] in [*********]. My other child [*********] is almost 18 and has recently started work.

    I have been looking for employment since January this year. I have applied for many job in many different areas of work. But due to needing to be available for my son when he is home I have been unsuccessfull.

    All I ask is that I be given a fair go. I have been home for the last 18 years raising my children, the last 10 of those on my own with the children. During this time we have survived on sole parent pension and child support or carers pension and carers allowance with my sons disability pension and child support.
    With my daughter now being 18 the child support will stop and we are in danger of being homeless as without working I can no longer make the mortgage payments.

    I have done all the right things in looking for work. I registered with Wise Employment. I am also registered with coles, woolworths, seek, careerone, hippo, my career, I look in the local papers every week.

    I just want to work so that I can provide for my family and still be there for my son when he needs me. I have been trying to get work as a domestic cleaner in this area as that would allow me to have the hours I need.

    I have often thought that I must not be alone in this. There must be other parents of disabled children going through the same thing as myself and its not fair we just want a fair go and don’t want to be punished just cause we have disabled children.

    Yours sincerely

    *****

    It is people like this whom the Howard Government has ignored. Rudd and Labor will help all those who are less well off, like this lady.

    Compassion is on its way back folks :) :):):)

  354. 354
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    I suggest if the ALP run a hard campaign in the last 2 weeks they will take a larger share of that 20%. They have yet to start their main campaign.

  355. 355
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    And while the Labor members in Queensland regularly discuss these issues the main talking point of the Liberals is the latest dramatic factional fight breaking out between Nat and Lib or Lib and Lib. It must be wearing because I haven’t noticed them putting in much of an effort to help Howard win the election. He’s on his own up here.

  356. 356
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    steve

    Bruce Flegg has officially been locked in a cupboard. The Liberal Party has gagged him. :)

  357. 357
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    356,

    Ruawake, must be hiding Barry O’Farrell from NSW in the same dark cupboard :)

  358. 358
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Must be a big cupboard!

  359. 359
    red wombat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Ted Baillieu has been locked in his personal wine cellar :-)

  360. 360
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    356 Seeney has been just as invisible too. Think they are sulking over the council amalgamations not changing a vote in the state and Springborg is set to strike once the Federal election is out of the way too. If I was in a rabble like that I think that I would hide too.

  361. 361
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    # 358 – A very big cupboard indeed. And big enough to take Steven Kaye, as well.

  362. 362
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Once the election is over Glen and Nostro should be deported to UTAH.

  363. 363
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Wow an even more radical immigration policy from the left deport white middle class Australians overseas because they don’t believe all of Rudd’s slogan’s…

  364. 364
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    361 I think a coalition leader in hiding is always a good look. Seeney will probably put out a press release or two during the campaign and then shake his head on election night and say if only they asked me for my wisdom they’d have won.

  365. 365
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    Wow an even more radical immigration policy from the left deport white middle class Australians overseas because they don’t believe all of Rudd’s slogan’s…

    Under Howard, being an Australian citizen doesn’t stop one from being deported.

  366. 366
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    No steve that will be Kroger.

  367. 367
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    You can say all the negative things you like about Peter Cundall, but I suspect a few facts remain: he is respected as a former wartime POW, he would have a reputation for being straightforward, and he is no doubt popular with all those old gardener retirees who like his show. It would seem to me that would all make him popular with a significant chunck of Howard’s core constituency. Attack him all you like… your just digging yourself a deeper hole.

  368. 368
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Glen – showing your biases there.

    Why does deporting WHITE Australians make the policy more radical?

    Vivian Solon was just as Australian as me and you (I assume) and Cornelia Rau is white!!!

  369. 369
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    At least Kroger has been on National TV. Seeny hasn’t even made it to the local papers.

  370. 370
    Autocrat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Announcing money for homeless accommodation is only of benefit to the homeless. How many homeless people were going to vote for the Coalition?

    None, your mob has completely abandoned them.

    In any case, Rudd’s not merely helping out the homeless, he’s making provision for the next generation of WorkChances’ victims.

  371. 371
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Just to annoy Nostradamus, I suspect Labor’s plan is to build the new accommodation for the homeless in marginal Coalition seats. The homeless can then voter Labor and make a difference.

    And I understand John Howard admitted to the Bananas in Pyjamas that WorkChoices was a mean and nasty policy, designed to hurt those least able to help themselves.

    However, because the Bananas are unable to speak, they have been unable to leak details of the conversation.

  372. 372
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    All i said was that his political persuasion was not to the right it was more to the left, i didn’t smear his reputation or doubt that he was being honest about his conversation.

    ShowsOn then i will qualify, Australian ‘born’ citizen.

  373. 373
    red wombat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Going on how the Libs use the Republican rule book they will say he was “AWOL” and not a POW.

  374. 374
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    Ruawake,

    Given his skill with coalition leadership teams, perhas someone should ask Bruce Flegg who would be Prime Minister after the elction if Howard wins? Does he know?

  375. 375
    Autocrat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    You can say all the negative things you like about Peter Cundall, but I suspect a few facts remain: he is respected as a former wartime POW, he would have a reputation for being straightforward, and he is no doubt popular with all those old gardener retirees who like his show. It would seem to me that would all make him popular with a significant chunck of Howard’s core constituency. Attack him all you like… your just digging yourself a deeper hole.

    The right’s ridiculous [i]ad hominem[/i] habit aside, am I right in thinking he once stood for the senate – for the CPA?

  376. 376
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    Cornelia Rau is not Australian she is German you fool, she had residency.

    And she was bonkers, who wouldn’t call their family or tell police where your family was? She brought it on herself, far as im concerned.

  377. 377
    BrissyRod
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:03 pm | Permalink

    yes of course – low cost housing and more railways in Liberal seats.

    Love it.

  378. 378
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    ‘Cundall was a Tasmanian Senate candidate for the Communist Party of Australia. He also supports many left wing political and environmental groups by speaking at rallies and events. He is a keen environmentalist.’

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Cundall#Political_career

    Just to back up my claim he is a lefty, and that it was not a smear.

  379. 379
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    374 Socrates, who is going to be Liberal Treasurer if the Libs win but Howard loses Bennelong?

  380. 380
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Good on ya Glen. Its good to see a compassionate Liberal person.

  381. 381
    Autocrat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    I’ll try again –

    The right’s ridiculous ad hominem habit aside, am I right in thinking he (Peter Cundall) once stood for the senate – for the CPA?

  382. 382
    RGee
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, he did stand for the CPA. He also is an active union member of MEAA.

  383. 383
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    Nostro is clearly joking here – let’s not all be Steve Price on him and take out of context what is evidently humour.

  384. 384
    adrian
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    “And she was bonkers, who wouldn’t call their family or tell police where your family was? She brought it on herself, far as im concerned.”

    You’ve hit rock bottom as far as I’m concerned, Glen. If we can’t protect the most vulnerable in our society, we’re a pretty poor excuse for a civilised country.

  385. 385
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    It’s a competition called dog eat dog and survival of the fittest as far as Glen is concerned.

  386. 386
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Im sorry but even for people with mental illness, how difficult is it to contact her family when she wont speak english or tell the police her details.

    Anyway she wasnt an Australian citizen so who cares?
    Deport her to Germany.

  387. 387
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    Lovely Glen, the warm heart of the right continues to remain cold and still. No doubt Vivian Solon had what was coming to her also?

  388. 388
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Yes she was bonkers.

    But the thing is, that people who are “bonkers” need help – not deporting.

    This, I think, is the fundamental difference between you and I.

  389. 389
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Glen, do people choose to have a mental disease? How can they bring it on themselves?

  390. 390
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    ‘Serenity Now, Insanity Later’ TofK.

  391. 391
    Pancho
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:10 pm | Permalink

    Glen – Rau was also mentally ill, and caught in a privately run system without adequate safety checks.

    Apart from the question of who goes into the business of locking up asylum seekers to make a bit of cash (what sort of society does that indicate – everything is NOT a business), the government is culpable for creating a system that has allowed people to be dealt with like this, so it could wash its hands of the more ugly aspects of its policies.

  392. 392
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Steve,

    385
    steve Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:08 pm
    It’s a competition called dog eat dog and survival of the fittest as far as Glen is concerned.

    Substitute “the Libs are” for “Glen is” ;-)

  393. 393
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    I never said they brought it on themselves, but its not hard to speak english and tell police your details and where your family are?

  394. 394
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Do you think he made up the conversation because he is a “lefty”?

    It is a gratuitous smear to help you and your brethren avoid objectively analysing what he had to say.

  395. 395
    Dangerous
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    I’m not much taken with attacking other posters, but Glen, you need to educate yourself about mental illness (especially psychotic illness) before posting again. If you’d like some suggestions for day centres looking for volunteers, I can help. One thing that sufferers of chronic schizophrenia always say they want, more than money, is more friends.

  396. 396
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    I never said that GG, i just said he was a lefty, i never said that he made up the conversation!

    SERENITY NOWWWWWWW!

  397. 397
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    I continue to believe Nostro is a lefty enjoying his artistic licence so as to elicit emotional responses from the heart. Bringing out the humanity of the left in a cold and heartless world by playing the devils advocate, and of course extracting the true opinion of the RW commentators for what they are, uncaring and self-serving closet autocrats.

  398. 398
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Actually Glen, schizophrenics often lose the ability to speak their second language (in this case English) when they are psychotic.

  399. 399
    barney
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Glen i think you’ve had an empathy bypass.

  400. 400
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Glen is also clearly adopting the jocular repose of Garrett.

  401. 401
    Damien J
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    Glen, as you frequently demonstrate but might not be aware, paranoid delusions often prevent people with mental illness from providing police with details. Mean AND ignorant! Isn’t that the problem with your side of politics?

  402. 402
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Well this poll has me thinking I should go through my election night checklist:

    Good bottle of bubbly – check
    Internet link and big TV to watch results – check
    Well insulated house so neighbors not disturbed by shouts of joy – check
    Out of ideas government – check
    Energised opposition – check
    Too old PM – check
    Credible opposition leader – check
    Polls predict government flogging – check
    Polls predict PM’s historic loss of own seat – check
    Local Liberal member in danger of defeat – check
    Interest rate rise due to kill Liberal’s last hope – check
    Ability to see look on Glen and Nostros faces – darn.

    Even without that last box checked, the schardenfreud-o-meter is of the scale.

  403. 403
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Then Diogenes how come she didn’t have any ID on her or a mobile phone on her or anything to say who she was i mean if you have mental issues like that you should take pracautions?

    ‘Serenity Now, Insanity Later’

  404. 404
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Interesting, Diogenes at 398.

    I didn’t know that.

  405. 405
    red wombat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Is this new Liberal policy?

    The following is word for word on Jason Wood’s (La Trobe) pamphlet just delivered.

    THE NUCLEAR ENERGY DEBATE.

    Nuclear energy is a fact of life and an important energy source in thirty countries across Europe, Asia and North America. However, I remain unconvinced that nuclear power is crucial to more low emission energy in Australia’s energy mix – especially given our riches of alternative energy sources like solar and wind. While many countries around the world use nuclear energy without incident , my greatest concern remains nuclear waste disposal. until safer methods of waste disposal are developed it will not have my support.

    That is why I do not support nuclear power in Australia.

  406. 406
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    This morning, on his radio program, Across Australia, Mr Wooley said he met Mr Garrett by chance at a Hobart cafe in early September before the election campaign began.

    He says the pair discussed environmental issues including the proposed Gunns' pulp mill and its effects not only on the Tamar Valley but more broadly on the Tasmanian landscape.

    "I certainly believe that Australians should be patriotic about our special landscape and its biota, its plants and its animals and that what is happening in Tasmania and to some extent in the forests of Gippsland is appalling," said Mr Wooley.

    "Peter Garrett agreed, he intimated that 'What we say in Opposition might not be what happens in Government.'''

    Mr Wooley says he did not raise the conversation until five weeks later because he did not think that outside an election campaign it was headline news that a politician says one thing and believes another.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081849.htm?section=justin

  407. 407
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen, has Brough finished measuring Bribie Island for the Nuclear Power station yet?

  408. 408
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen – becuase she was “bonkers”. We’ve been through this.

    If she was behaving rationally then she wouldn’t be psychotic would she?

    A new Liberal Mental Health Policy:

    Only those displaying ABSOLUTELY NO SYMPTOMS of their disease are eligible for treatment……

  409. 409
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    402,

    Socrates, which local Lib (elecotorate) are you putting out of office, hopefully? :) :) [I am in a safe Labor seat, but good on you for helping the cause]

  410. 410
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Serenity Now, Steve

    Serenity Now.

  411. 411
    Tory Crimes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    #
    386
    Glen Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:08 pm

    Im sorry but even for people with mental illness, how difficult is it to contact her family when she wont speak english or tell the police her details.

    Anyway she wasnt an Australian citizen so who cares?
    Deport her to Germany.

    You are an absolute disgrace glen-even for a Tory. This is the sort of compassion-less drivel that is prevalent in conservative parties these days. These days what am I saying? Blamingthe victim has always been a core Tory conviction.You are a shocker.

  412. 412
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    No Steve, he had to start again because he was still operating on the imperial measurement system.

  413. 413
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    We will have serenity on 24th November when the Rodents concession speech is deliverd. :)

  414. 414
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    Gee, I enjoy this site! I only found it whilst web browsing the other night. I am over 60 and follow every election with great interest. Iam not rich, and still have a small mortgage, which will be paid off shortly, so know what interest increases have produced.
    I have had cancer twice, and am still not in remission, so I know what the health system is like
    I well remember past years as do nearly every other senior member of the community, and I must confess that at one stage I was a swinging voter, and that I actually helped Fraser defeat Whitlam. But then I saw the light as to what was actually happening under the libs, and have never voted for them since, my conscience just will not allow it.
    There are many posts which defy logic,(you know the ones),and when I read them I feel ashamed to be Australian. This “greed is good mentality” displayed is just so abhorrent, and typical of liberal voters. They have no compassion other to themselves, and care little for the country as a whole. When things do not appear to be going their way , they resort to mud-slinging and name calling.

    I hope the polls are correct and that all the predictions come to fruition, and that there will be a change in Govt, then at least we may get a little compassion back.
    As for Nostrodamus, perhaps you should change your id to IGNORAMUS .I have never heard such bile about the homeless, and you should feel shame for your insensitivity, but then, what does one expect from liberals?

  415. 415
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    glen @ 403 – are you actually serious? if you are, then you really need to get yourself a bit of education about severe mental illness. you have no idea.

  416. 416
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Given the offensive nonsense you have been spouting today, here is a recording by another happy bunch of travellers that had similar ideas to you.

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=EdM8PDu6VMg

  417. 417
    Dangerous
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    <a href=”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serenity_(film)”Serenity?

  418. 418
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Even if the immigration department actually believed Rau was German, why not contact the German embassy, get her identified, and then try to contact her (presumed) family in Germany? You still wouldn’t dump a mentally person in limbo. They completely screwed this up. If the roles were reversed, and the German government did this to a mentally ill Australian citizen in germany, what would we call them? For that matter, if the government has handled this case correctly, how come we are negotiating a six figure settlement with her lawyers?

    Ironically, I think this is an example of one of many blunders made by immigration that was not necessarily the fault of the current government. In my time in Canberra I found Immigration to be one of the most bureaucratic and incompetent departments in the federal public service. But instead of just being annoyed and using it as a chance to clean up the mess, this government goes for standard response number one – deceit and denial. Then when the undeniable evidence of failure comes in, they look guilty. And they are guilty – of the cover up.

  419. 419
    red wombat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Another gem by Jason Wood (Lib, La Trobe)….

    Australia should be a world leader in emissions trading and this should be the centrepiece of any climate change strategy as the Kyoto Protocol targets do not go far enough.

  420. 420
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    She is trying to sue the Australian Government for something she was partly to blame for, so 150million for the homeless a fair chunk out of that would go to her because he didnt take precautions for her illness. I’m not saying our system didnt work properly i am saying she is partly to blame. I don’t apologise for that and how come she wasn’t on medication???

    Julie Howard will repeat Lloyd Braun’s classic quote in a concession speech if he loses, “Serenity Now, Insanity Later” – with facial twitch.

  421. 421
    Dangerous
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Bugger. Serenity?

  422. 422
    John Hunt Is A Coward
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Sean 302 on Caroline Overington’s fluff piece

    Here was my contribution:
    Caroline, of course the Libs can still win the election. Is this an insight you are offering as an insider? But has this anything to do with Garret’s Gaffe which incidentally is peanuts compared to Abbott’s attack on a dying man. And what about Burkegate, Reinergate, Strippergate, Earwaxgate etc, were they not all going to sink the Labor party’s re-election chances?

    Do the polls matter to you at all? Do they have any meaning when you write your “analysis”? The insight you are offering is indeed insightful but for entirely different reasons. Your piece offers a glimpse into an abyss – the void! In this vast emptiness and nothingness we find – The horror – The horror! Could the Libs really lose? Could voters be so stupid?

  423. 423
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen @376

    Ha!

    Even for you Glen, that’s one helluva statement!

  424. 424
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Julie 409,

    I’m in Sturt (SA) which was not marginal but with the big swing in SA is a chance to fall. I’m happy to call it 50/50 now. It would be good to see Chris Pyne explore other career options, but if Kirribilli is made rat free on 24 Nov I won’t really care.

  425. 425
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    420 [I’m not saying our system didnt work properly]

    Actually very little works properly in Howard’s Australia and we can only hope the Quarantine and hospital systems are fixed before horseflu is replaced by birdflu. The slashing of standards of service is matched only by the slashing of funding under this regime,

  426. 426
    John Hunt Is A Coward
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Glen @376

    Did you realise that Cornelia Rau is related to General Wenck?

    When General Wenck is the Libs only last realistic hope, why would you demonise his offspring and bring a pox on the Libs house?

    Are you trying to bring everyone down with you to your level? Apres nous le deluge!

  427. 427
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    JHIAC you mean Liberal Bunker don’t you?

  428. 428
    Damien J
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Glen, do you know how hard it is to get medication for mental illness in this country? There are few specialists even in the cities and people with severe mental illness often have to wait weeks or months for referrals, especially in regional areas. If they are admitted, they’re usually released within a week and even those with severe symptoms are often have minimal outpatient contact (eg. a phone call from a mental health nurse weekly). Many suicide. Yet the Howard Government’s health policy delivers discounts on running shoes and deluxe gym memberships for the wealthy through it’s reprehensible health insurance rebate. howrd’s $30 per week tax cuts won’t change the ugly truth of this situation.

  429. 429
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Damien with great respect, who has constitutional power over Health?

    The States are the ones failing the system, they have failed and yet you blame Howard.

  430. 430
    Just Me
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    Glen, stop digging. You are way out of your depth and trashing what little is left of your own reputation.

    And here is another good example of the hard right’s view of how the disabled and sick should be treated:

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/11/03/do0304.xml

  431. 431
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Hmm, Howard using Death to porkbarrell a road.

    Prime Minister John Howard has vows to fully fund the upgrade of a road north of Sydney, which collapsed earlier this year, killing two adults and three children.

    The section of the Old Pacific Highway collapsed during flooding in June this year at Somersby, on the New South Wales Central Coast.

    A couple, their two daughters and a nephew were all killed when their car was swept away.

    Mr Howard says repairs on the stretch of road and another nearby will begin as soon as the coroner releases the site, if the Coalition wins government.

    "This road of course is not a federal road - the funding and upgrade of it is the responsibility of the local council," he said.

    "But we have decided that we will fund that upgrade and also of an area of road which is about one kilometre away from here."

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/05/2081987.htm?section=justin

  432. 432
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    glen, three words for you: vertical fiscal imbalance.

  433. 433
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Well, when the Tasmanian Government decided to make the hard call (almost universally agreed with by Health professionals) to rationalise the Tasmanian system the Howard Federal Government undermined the policy for naked political ends.

    The Federal Government’s share of income is rising but share of Health expenditure is falling.

    I think that about explains why we blame Howard.

  434. 434
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Yeah and the GST cash flow to the States is rising, explain that passthepopcorn?

  435. 435
    Liz
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Passthepopcorn 334, I was trying to make a broader philospohical point about wanting to live in a society in which homeless people are helped, therefore it is, in that sense about me, and about all of us and the sort of country in which we want to live.

  436. 436
    Inner Westie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Once the election has past, I’d happily agree to the establishment within this country (somewhere near West Wyalong, say) of a heavily secured secessional enclave of disillusioned Young Liberals such as Glen and Tabitha. Fairgoistan (say) could act, on the one hand, as an independent state within a state – unpolluted by the arrogant, imperial, dogmatic, bigoted, narrow-minded, mean-spirited, racially-intolerant and graspingly-aspirational citizens of The Left – and, on the other, as a kind of rehabilitation camp. Workshops and training seminars could be held to help these young folk re-find themselves after their (Wollstonecraft) Warlord’s catastrophic demise, featuring conservative warm-up clowns such as Bolt, Ackerman, Albrechtsen and Jones and goofy, hilariously countercultural vaudevillians such as Pearson, Divine, Henderson and Windshuttle. They could all dress up in jodhpurs and play polo together on a dirt pitch, exchange pastoral fantasies, eat truffles and playfully accuse the weaker and less witty of their number of being homosexual, tree-fetishising, abortion-loving, cycle-commuting, Pilger-worshipping, Radio-National-podcasting, election-sabotaging losers.

    What do you reckon G & T?

  437. 437
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    I don’t quite believe it, but if 38% of voters in the Galaxy poll haven’t made up their mind, then Labor should be at least a bit concerned.

  438. 438
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Glen, perhaps everyone with a mental illness should be microchipped. Then you could keep track of them. And why not sterilise them at the same time. If it was good enough for Adolf…

  439. 439
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Maybe Glen has a point; we shouldn’t blame Howard for everything. Only the things he actually caused, like WorkChoices. Here’s a headline I’d like to see:

    “Howard Denies Responsibility for Prosperity”
    “I can’t take the credit for our prosperity”, said the PM. “After all the economy was already on the rise when we took office. It was part of a world wide trend, just like the low interst rates. Our GDP growth per capita is actually similar to Europe’s. Obviously I had nothing to do with China’s growth either, which was the main cause of growth here. And don’t blame me for low interest rates – that was all Keating’s fault!”, said the defiant PM.

  440. 440
    Richard Jones
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Look, I object to these comments about rats. Rats are intelligent hardworking
    inoffensive creatures. It’s not appropriate to refer to John Howard as a rat.
    I like rats …and so do our pythons.

  441. 441
    Rusted on
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Glen, I was going to mention the 353 men, women and children who died on SIEVX on October 15 2001. Silly me, they weren’t Australians, they weren’t even people. No, they were asylum-seekers and queue-jumpers.

    http://www.newmatilda.com/home/articledetailmagazine.asp?ArticleID=2529

  442. 442
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Will 415

    Well said…..

  443. 443
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes you should know that Herr Hitler euthanized the insane, deformed and mentally unfit in Deutschland during the 1930s and 1940s.

    Oh course i disagree with such harsh methods, but i believe that ‘when it comes to’ mental illness the State and the individual have a dual responsibility to manage their illness.

  444. 444
    Ebenezer
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    376Glen Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:02 pm
    Cornelia Rau is not Australian she is German you fool, she had residency.
    And she was bonkers, who wouldn’t call their family or tell police where your family was? She brought it on herself, far as im concerned.

    393Glen Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:11 pm
    I never said they brought it on themselves, but its not hard to speak english and tell police your details and where your family are?

    Enough said.

  445. 445
    red wombat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Can we please stop feeding the Lib cretin?

  446. 446
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Rusted on i don’t believe that incident happened in Australian waters, hence i don’t care what happened in relation to that incident.

  447. 447
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    Finally a Tory with some common sense.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/11/05/nmigrants105.xml

  448. 448
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Mark Vale trying to be hip with the Yoof.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,5735803,00.jpg

  449. 449
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 376 – as the father of a son who has suffered a severe mental disorder, you comments are crap. Hope I can get to meet you sometime – but check your medical insurance.

  450. 450
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Interesting tactic

    howard was interviewed on local radio 92.5 (scott levi-lightweight)
    allowed to talk uninterrupted along with announcer going ooh, good,great

    then when rudd intervied he is interrupted ,sterner voice of interviewer, challenge to every point and doubts expressed about policy statements

    those ct “re-education kits” are getting a lot of use

  451. 451
    HarryH
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    will @ 414

    i enjoyed reading your post.

    welcome

  452. 452
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Alex McDonnel there is a difference between saying someone was partly responsible for their predicament not for their mental illness but for their inability to manage their illness properly and to say they brought it on themselves because of their illness. I hope you take this into consideration while you are rearranging my face should we ever meet.

  453. 453
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Actually Glen, his very first act as Chancellor was to bring in sterilisation for the mentally ill. Euthanasia came later. By demonising people for their illness, he has able eventually to convince people like you that killing them was in the German peoples best interests.

  454. 454
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Oh course i disagree with such harsh methods, but i believe that ‘when it comes to’ mental illness the State and the individual have a dual responsibility to manage their illness.

    I for one am happy to assist in managing the mental illness and apparent Alzheimer’s of Unkie Howard.

    I am writing him a prescription of 11 years worth of chickens coming home to roost and a program of shattered delusions of grandeur.

  455. 455
    Dario
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    cynic, that’s been the case for a long time. Depsite it, the ALP still leads comfortably.

  456. 456
    Damien J
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Diminishing Federal contributions through the health agreement, abject failure to deliver substantial change after release of the April 2006 Senate Report on Mental Health, but more importantly, the strategic positioning of the Federal Government to outsource all rapidly escalating chronic health cost centres while holding onto only the comparatively stable costs associated with end of life.

  457. 457
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes i think we are getting way off track we should be talking about the fall in the Tory primary vote and the stagnant Labor primary vote.

  458. 458
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Can we please stop feeding the Lib cretin?

    Yeah, leave this level of twerpy thick ‘daddy told me’ bul.sh.t to the branch meetings of the young liberals. Its embarressing.

  459. 459
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Glen @457

    “the stagnant Labor primary”

    Just gold…..i hear Don Bradman’s average ’stagnated’ around 99.94….

  460. 460
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Dario

    i know uhlmann etc are gone,but guys like levi were impartial up till this week (i listen a lot) thats why I thought a CT makeover may have been applied to the regionals-have other bloggers noticed same?

  461. 461
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Passthepopcorn 334, I was trying to make a broader philospohical point about wanting to live in a society in which homeless people are helped, therefore it is, in that sense about me, and about all of us and the sort of country in which we want to live

    yes, liz, i get that. with respect, you sound like a social worker.

  462. 462
    Liz
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Nothing like a social worker. Though, there’s nothin wrong with that.

  463. 463
    Evan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Glen & Nostro, I don’t think this belting-the-homeless caper is helping your cause.

    Rather it exposes the pair of you as, well, completely devoid of any compassion for people who’ve had to do it pretty hard. There’s quite a few of them out there, and they’re not all lazy sods. Many are people with mental illness, young people and women escaping abusive situations, people who’ve just had a few crappy breaks (like losing their jobs).

    What you fail to recognise is that no-one chooses to be homeless. They don’t just wake-up one day and say to themselves: “Gee, wouldn’t it be a great idea to go and live on a park bench and eat out of rubbish bins.”

    So, are you guys representative of what it means to be a Liberal today or what?

    If so, I don’t think John Stuart Mill would approve. Maggie Thatcher might, but look what happened to her: Put down by her own party for the good of the same.

  464. 464
    Andrew
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    why do you guys bother feeding Glenn the troll. Youve successfully allowed this thread (about a 54/46 Galaxy poll- NOT good for Howard) to be hijacked into a discussion on race, mental illness and homelessness. If you dont respond to his posts, he may just go away

  465. 465
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Liz – I’m with you.

    And I’m an investment banker – about as far from Social Worker as you can get!!!

  466. 466
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    How many times has Howard changed his core election message during this campaign so far?

    His messages are all garbled. One minute we hear that the economy is going so great that we could end up with an unemployment rate with a “3″ in front of it, and only Howard can deliver this. The next minute, news on the economic front is apparently not so great, and therefore we need Howard and his “experience” in order to limit the damage. And then, on one day, Howard is suggesting that WorkChoices has limited wage rises, which has helped to keep inflation from being much worse. And then on a different day, either he or Hockey are saying that WorkChoices delivers higher wages. A while back, Howard and Costello were pointing to their economic management as being responsible for limiting inflation, when figures were not too high, and now, Howard says they are outside his control. And on and on it goes…

    Howard is destroying his credibility on matters of economics because he keeps changing his story in order to limit the political fallout on any given day. Either he doesn’t have a good understanding of economics or he really will say anything, and lie, in order to be re-elected.

    Why should anyone vote for a man who wants nothing other than to be PM simply for the sake of being PM? There are probably thousands of Australians who would equally like to be PM simply for the sake of having power and luxury. What makes Howard special? Why him? I really do wonder sometimes why we have as many as 46% of people still planning to vote for or preference Howard.

    At any rate, Rudd has started to talk about the mixed messages from Howard, but it’s only the tip of the iceberg:

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/pms-big-interest-rate-con/2007/11/05/1194117913943.html

  467. 467
    Lindsay voter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    I have opened my sportingbet account (thanks to Alan H of yesterday’s Bennelong blog) and placed my free $100 (you need only $30 to start your account) on Maxine McKew. If she wins, I’ll contribute some of my winnings to William!

  468. 468
    Inner Westie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Glen, have you considered that in making absurd statements that you could not possibly personally believe (e.g. that you “don’t care what happened in relation to [the SIEV X] incident”), you are: (a) very clumsily and childishly exposing your role as a Young Liberal provocateur and diversion troll; (b) desperately seeking attention, in the manner of a hyperactive pre-teen, by becoming more and more abusive, demeaning (e.g. of Cornelia Rau) and shrill; and (c) acting against your own Young Liberal plan by providing the sophisticated commentators on this site with a platform on which to re-express, and often deepen and intensify, their convictions and to thereby strengthen their solidarity?

  469. 469
    Kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Did the Howard Government allow 300 odd people to drown in order to create a re-election event?

  470. 470
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    Liz, Im also with you. And I’m a plastic surgeon which is even further from a social worker then an investment banker!

  471. 471
    barney
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    This Glen is obviously from the Alex Hawke faction. They really must do something about their roster system. I think it just shows how short they are of personnel.

  472. 472
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Howard isn’t responsible for the homeless mentally ill.

    Well lets see if you have a person who suffers Mental illness and due to this condition they are unable to contact Centrelink and Centrelink following Howard’s procedures and cut off this person pension then how can Howard not be responsible.

    This person was found in a very poor state yet Centrelink had found it too easy too cut off the pension then to find out why they hadn’t been in contact.

    Now thanks to the excellent work of certain persons I wont name, Centrelink (the department which never admits to a mistake)

    sounds familiar ;)

    That person was able to get the care they needed, not from the federal Govt but by a State Govt agencies so while the Federal agency just flicked the switch leaving the State agency to pick up the pieces.

    Yes, I know that State Govt is mostly responsible for Social policy but the Federal Govt have a clear responsibly to look after all.

    It is fully responsible for pensions and Mental illness isn’t like the common cold, also if the federals are so worried by mental illness why are Psychologist not claimable against Medicare, well this is so Howard like, it is but Howard doesn’t want too many to know this.

    20% percent of the population suffer a mental illness of some sort.

    What sought of Govt is it.

    Howard deserves to lose!

  473. 473
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    The Liberal Party need more people in the Conservative Right faction.

  474. 474
    vera
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    445
    red wombat Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:58 pm
    Can we please stop feeding the Lib cretin?

    I agree, why is everyone pandering to the stupid jumped up little twits’ ego. The sad twerp obviously hasn’t any friends and is more than likely ignored by everyone he has contact with in real life. So he comes on this site and plays you all for fools making racist and negative statements to get you to bite, which feeds his mental illness of delusions of granduer.
    I have been enjoying the comments on this site for the past week or so but you have allowed this moron who writes under the names of Glen, Tabitha. nostrils etc to take over and is all becoming a big bore….

  475. 475
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    There’s no point even trying to reason with Glen and Nostra. They have felt disheartened ever since the government first tanked in the polls. Winding up non-Liberal voters is their way of gaining some kind of satisfaction. It is revenge.

    This is why they spend time on a blog where the vast majority of people are non-Liberal voters rather than Ackerman’s or Bolt’s blogs.

  476. 476
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Posts 414 (Will) & 442 (Sean) concern me even allowing for the context (a response to a very partisan Liberal blogger). Well intentioned support for one side of politics (predominantly for the Australian Labor Party on this blog) is fair enough. However, to categorise the other side (a little less than half the voting population on current opinion polling figures) as lacking compassion, being greedy and not caring for the country as whole is, as I see it, another form of mud slinging and name calling. It is also divisive and plainly an incorrect generalisation. Further, it is a practice to be avoided because those who do it can too easily convince themselves that they always hold the ‘moral high ground’ over those who do not share their politics. That is pure self indulgence.

  477. 477
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Ok, back onto polls, folks :) :) …… Newspoll predictions? I will say 56 – 44, same as the most recent ACN and Morgan so for Newspoll, that is an increase of +2 back to Labor.

  478. 478
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll ALP 55 – Libs with Nuts 45

  479. 479
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll has been erratic lately. It could end up anywhere. But I don’t think the Garrett “gaffe” will be having an effect. For a start, I doubt many people even know about it. And second, Howard has a much worse reputation for going back on promises.

    My guess would be a status quo result: 56 – 44 or 55 – 45.

  480. 480
    Matt D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll will be 54-46 again. Unchanged.

  481. 481
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    55.5 -45.5

  482. 482
    Richard Jones
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    55-45
    Many thought there would be a narrowing towards the end, most of all Liberals, but the narrowing has only come back to a 55-45 massive lead for Labor.
    The final result is still likely to be narrower between 53-47 and 54-46 with wide variations in different seats. Queensland is obviously the key and that may well be very significant for Kevin Rudd.

  483. 483
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    416 Greeensborough Growler. Brilliant deduction my dear Holmes.

  484. 484
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    I agree with others. Newspoll unchanged at 54-46.

    The NEXT one, after the interest rate rise, will be the one to take notice of.

  485. 485
    Richard Jones
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Antonio, some are trying to convince themselves that the interest rate rise can be turned into a plus for the Coalition! That would be the maddest spin of all. If there is indeed a rate increase it would take several days to sink in and for people to talk about it. The maximum impact would be on election day. It might bring the 55-45 result on the day after all. I still think 54-46 max though.

  486. 486
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Glen 452 – re your face -may be you could do a deal with Diogenes!

  487. 487
    Su H
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Has anyone else seen the comment in Crikey today re a Senator Ronaldson telling a friend that, win or lose, Howard will be gone within a week. Do you think that will get a run in the MSM.
    Nice comments, Will. Good luck.

  488. 488
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Glen said:

    then i will qualify, Australian ‘born’ citizen.

    This is EXACTLY why I despise the Howard government and many of those who support them. People like you Glen.

    Until 2001 I had voted Labor only twice in 3 decades. For me the Lib’s gloss starting loosing its shine when they took over most of Hanson’s racist agenda, followed by Tampa and then the illegal war on Iraq. But what really made my blood boil were the calls following the Cronulla riots to deport foreign born Australian citizens if they broke Australian laws, a notion the Libs weren’t in any hurry to squash.

    I couldn’t believe what I was hearing when a local radio host was spruiking the idea on air, so I called the program pointed out that my family arrived in this country when I was 2 yo, had become a citizen as soon as I could and had served in the ADF for 33 years, in part, because I wanted to give something back. So how dare this drongo say I wasn’t really an Australian because I hadn’t been born here! And what was the reply? “So what, you got paid didn’t you?” Yes, I was but I don’t remember getting any more than my locally born peers to compensate for risking my neck while not having full citizenship rights. And it certainly wasn’t anything like what I could have got working for Qantas.

    But you know the really disturbing part Glen, for the next hour most of the callers agreed with the F#**wit.

    That is what the Howard government has done to this country, Glen. They, and you and your ilk, should be very, very ashamed.

  489. 489
    Kate Ellis for PM
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    I have only recently (about 3 weeks ago) started reading the blogs on this site (got to know about Pollbludger through Possums Pollytics). I must say this in one of the most informative (and fun) sites and between Poss and Pollbludger I get all the useful information and analyses I need about Elections 2007. So thank you William and other contributors. I live in Adelaide and it looks like we are up for a big swing to ALP. I also think Christopher Payne is in serious danger of losing his seat (probably be determined by FF preferences).

  490. 490
    mytym
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Absolutely no chance in the world that Newspoll will be unchanged. Outside chance of 55/45 but most likely 56/44 or better for ALP

  491. 491
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    447 Glen. Tory and commonsense. Now thats an oxymoron.

  492. 492
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    David Charles

    If you think glens comments reflect the opinion of half of the australian electorate then I think you’re the one who is slandering people. Glen is welcome here, he can even post, but if the standard drops to a certain level where he is clearly spouting prejudiced illogical and nonfactual nonsense then its valid to question why he should get any attention.

  493. 493
    Pancho
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    The movement in Newspolls has seemed to be for whoever has been in the press, whether their coverage be good or bad, for the past several weeks. So I wouldn’t be surprised if Labor is up a point or two on the back of both Roxon and Garrett’s press.

  494. 494
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    487 Su,

    487
    Su H Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 4:04 pm
    Has anyone else seen the comment in Crikey today re a Senator Ronaldson telling a friend that, win or lose, Howard will be gone within a week. Do you think that will get a run in the MSM.
    Nice comments, Will. Good luck.

    Does this Senator say *why* he thinks Howard will be gone within a week if they win? The “if they lose” option is obvious ;-) ……

  495. 495
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    love it Chris, or the sensible conservative.

  496. 496
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    I’m pretty sure Ronaldson, who comes from Ballarat, is a Costello supporter. He’s pretty influential behind the scenes.

  497. 497
    centaur_007
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Here, here Mayo,

    This primevil minister will be remembered as the most devisive, racist, unethical, dictator in Australia’s history. Not a kind word can be said for this mean little hypocrtit and his bunch of merry prixs!

    Banished forever into the primevil slime he has come from.

  498. 498
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Yes Richard #485 it’s bizarre logic to suggest that an interest rate rise will bring more support for the coalition. If that was the case, they should be promising higher taxes and a recession, on the basis that the worse it gets, the more we need the coalition.

    The only time this logic worked was in 1993, when Keating managed to convince voters that Hewson’s “cure” for the economy was worse than Labor’s malaise.

    Hewson was effectively offering WorkChoices, as well as a 10% public service job cut and a 15% GST. Rudd certainly isn’t saddled with any of that.

  499. 499
    Crispy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    It’s a brave bludger who’d predict an unchanged Newspoll. They’ve been bouncing around like a panel van in schoolies week. I’m guessing wildly at a high outlier… say 57 ALP – 43 Abusers of the Homeless and the Sick.

  500. 500
    Su H
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Julie – no other comment, just that Howard will be gone in a week. Maybe that was why Howard was so defensive about his agreement with Costello on Insiders yesterday. If he wins Bennelong and the polls are right about the swing elsewhere then the knives will be well and truly out and he could be gone either by stepping down or being made to. I can’t see him staying to sit in Opposition.

  501. 501
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Sean (492) Please reread my post and Will’s post (414). You have misrepresented my position and that is very naughty!

  502. 502
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I suspect Ronaldson knows Howard is gone in Bennenlong

    He is a smart operator!!

    updated Newspoll prediction 57-43

  503. 503
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Chris B,

    I hate Melbourne Ports Liberals as well.

    http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=GGp7IFc5jbc

  504. 504
    Ratsak
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    I’ll go with Newspoll back to 58-42, just because I love the sound of Tory wailing and gnashing of teeth.

    Dennis to go for “Howard Supported by Over 5 Million Voters” Headline.

  505. 505
    Ricky
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    As we arrive at the end of his reign I’d like to add this little piece.

    Decisions John Howard has made that I am very happy with. And these are pure trivia.

    1 – He made the public service use the word ‘programme’ again after the word program was being used in basically all official documents. I liked that.

    2 – Howard may wear the rugby union tracksuit, and try to commentate cricket, but his favourite sport is actually soccer. Being a huge soccer fan, I am glad that the PM refers to the sport as football, takes it seriously and has promoted it a lot in Australia. He’s lent some legitimacy to it. For example, (I believe and could be wrong on this) he officially changed the Australian english word for soccer to football. Plus he showed up at the A-League Grand Final and presented the trophy (despite receiving a resounding chorus of boos from the Melbourne crowd for his troubles).

    Maybe I could think of more stuff if I tried.

    Howard’s lowest moment

    Wrapping himself in the flag in 2001, and relying on September 11 and the Tampa and generally being dishonest in saving himself from defeat, panic-mongering the electorat and playing off and stoking racist fears to get people into voting for the Government. Perhaps its sadder, though, that the Australian people believed him.

    There hasn’t been, in my opinion, a worse moment since I was born.

    There are a few more but this one stands out.

  506. 506
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    I’ve heard the suggestion that if Labor romp it in with a big margin, that Cossie will pull the pin early in the next term to go into private business, rather than risk sticking around as opposition leader and face an election in three years he knows he wont be able to win.

  507. 507
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    I agree with the proposition that Howard will be gone quickly whatever the outcome. If the Libs win and he keeps his seat, he will still be pushed out the door very quickly by his party. If the Libs win and he loses his seat, no one in the Libs will be offering him their seat so he can stay on. If Labor wins, irrespective of whether he wins his seat, he will be gone in a flash.
    Also, on election night, Howard won’t make a concesion speech. He will deny the outcome on the night saying somehing like ‘we have to wait for the postal votes to come in’. Then, the following day he will quit without any public statement and disappear from view for a very long time. Good.

  508. 508
    Crispy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Uh oh. The program/programme genie is out of the bottle. ‘Programme’ is actually a wanky 19th century Frenchified affectation. ‘Program’ is the original and correct spelling, from the Greek(?) root. I can find links if you want to argue…

  509. 509
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    Ratsak

    I agree 58-42 the beginning of “The Widening” :)

  510. 510
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    “Noocat Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 3:40 pm

    There’s no point even trying to reason with Glen and Nostra …” exactly!!

    I just bet my free $100 on Maxine ;)

  511. 511
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    Ha ha

    Lynton Crosby on agenda just said “When Labor are elected” :-P

  512. 512
    Antonio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    Crispy is right. “Program” is more commonly used, and “programme” is an affectation.

    The Macquarie Dictoriary says: “Until recently, programme was widely considered the British spelling, and program the American. There are those who like to retain the former spelling for all meanings apart from those which relate to computers, but many people have adopted the spelling program in all cases.”

    Get with the program.

  513. 513
    Inner Westie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    What are you saying Diogenes! That Cossie’s not a born statesman? The punters’ll LOVE him once he’s had the long-delayed chin surgery and frontal lobe extraction.

    Cossie the BBQ legend. Everybody’s mate. Hawkie in a pin stripe. I’m telling you, he’ll be a ding dong winner once the vermin’s smoked out of Kirribilli.

  514. 514
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    ricky, i thought johnny warren was responsible for the change to “football” from “soccer”.

  515. 515
    Sean
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    There would now be a strong incentive for libs to start distancing themselves from the Rodent with a view to positioning themselves in the post rat era. Ronaldson’s comment should probably be seen in that light…..as with Turnbulls leaking of the cabinet discussion. I imagine howard is an object of strong hatred for many of his colleagues and that they rue the fact that they didn’t boot him after APEC when they had the chance.

  516. 516
    blindoptimist
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    378
    Glen Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 2:04 pm

    ‘Cundall was a Tasmanian Senate candidate for the Communist Party of Australia. He also supports many left wing political and environmental groups by speaking at rallies and events. He is a keen environmentalist.’
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Cundall#Political_career
    Just to back up my claim he is a lefty, and that it was not a smear.

    Glen, i’m surprised that you could imply that being called left-wing is in some way insulting. Maybe in the barking-mad branch of the Liberal party, it is not a polite thing to say. But in the rest of society, having leftward inclinations is a sign that human decency still exists.

  517. 517
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Re interest rates:
    Recalling Teh Furry One’s graph tracking interest rates alongside ALP primary vote, Team Rodent are collectively rooting themselves with the spin “we never knowingly done it” they are dishing in response to the Galaxy push-polling (cf. Bryce 243)

    Strategically stupid; deliciously ironic.

  518. 518
    blindoptimist
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    My completely unscientific prediction for newspoll is 55/45.

  519. 519
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Howard is always banging on about Aussie values. So its interesting how Rudd’s homeless policy has exposed the Howard Liberals’ (especially those posting here) lack of respect for the greatest Aussie value – mateship!

    As defined by the government’s own culture.gov.au site, mateship is “a sense of shared experience, mutual respect and unconditional assistance.

  520. 520
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    On the subject of what the Libs will do when they lose, are you all familiar with the zoological phenomenon of the “ratking”? I kid you not! Its when there are too many rats are in an enclosed space and their tails start knotting mixed with their excrement. They become one organism that must move together and when one rat dies, the others eat it to stop it being a dead weight. There are normally only ten or so rats but there can be up to 30. It reminds me of the Liberal party. And if you dont believe me…
    http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=611381

  521. 521
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Based on Bryan’s analysis of his 5 favourite bookies from yesterday, 3 have moved in ALP’s favour, 1 in LNP’s and another is even. Not sure if they are leaked the result, but I strongly suspect it. Maybe they havent got it yet, or my mind has instilled a fantasy in my perception of reality. Insert conspiracy theories here;

  522. 522
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    “Also, on election night, Howard won’t make a concesion speech. He will deny the outcome on the night saying somehing like ‘we have to wait for the postal votes to come in’. Then, the following day he will quit without any public statement and disappear from view for a very long time.”

    507, Alex, everyone and their mother knows that convention is that the winner doesn’t make his speech until the loser makes his first. No one would let Howard get away with this one, the media will be hounding both Labor and Liberal HQ that night.

    Now, I believe you “without any public statement for a very long time” :) :) ……

  523. 523
    Ricky
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Lol at the program/programme debate.

    I just prefer programme! there you go! Me and Johnny can agree on something.

    Also, Howard made ‘football’ the official word the same way he made programme the official word. Johnny warren contributed to the popularity of the term and to just about everything else to do with the game.

    So is there a 100 dollar free bet deal with any of the bookies for the election? Because I’m happy to jump on Maxine’s odds in Bennelong.

  524. 524
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    Just saw a national security ad – not a Govt ad anymore but authorised by Mock Keelty AFP.

    Sneaky Ratties.

  525. 525
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    Ricky yep – free $100 at sortingbet if you open an account with $30

  526. 526
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    oops that’s SPORTINGBET

  527. 527
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    There is no way Howard will hang around in opposition. Even if he wins Bennelong, he won’t even attend the first sitting of parliament.

  528. 528
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Yes ruawake, those ads make me really angry. Howard has just put money into the AFP pre calling the election, and is running his agenda (nat sec, internet security…) through govt organisations. Sickening abuse of the caretaker protocols. Ive put down the baseball bat, and have picked up the electoral rifle. Though I will not be voting for the shooters party!

  529. 529
    Alan H
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Ricky, SportingBet, you have to start an account with $30.00

    cheers,

    Alan H

  530. 530
    HarryH
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    David Charles @ 476

    what a ridiculous post.

    will was airing his feelings, and they are very widespread.

    Howard and anybody still supporting him has to wear his ugly baggage as well as his good baggage.

    John Howard has been a divisive and ugly leader.

    Between both sides of politics i would say the vast majority disagree with his ugly,divisive, uncaring policies.

    and that includes a lot of Libs who will still vote for the Party.

  531. 531
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    TofK re AFP – there’s a building on Anzac Parade in Canberra which had been vacant for many years – i think it was last year that refurbishment commenced to house the greatly expanded AFP.

    I had an AFP guy in the taxi last week and, as we passed that building he commented that, because the AFP has increased from 2,500 to over 6,000 since 2001, that building was now not big enough. Anybodies guess what money was wasted.

  532. 532
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll prediction – let’s go way out there – 58-42.

    Primaries: 50-39

    Hope so. Lateline should be fun if that comes true. Maybe Howard will get axed tomorrow under cover of the horses …

  533. 533
    Ratsak
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    Programme for me. It must be the lattes. Can’t believe Howard would be one too. Surely that’s an ay-leet spelling and should be mocked and marginalised at all costs.

  534. 534
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Ratsak – remember Howard loves the old country and all its ways. Program is after all an Americanism, and although he also loves GWB he is still probably hoping QE2 makes him Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports, too … Hyacinth would love it!

  535. 535
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll will probably be better than Galaxy, but not THAT much better. As it was taken on the same weekend as Galaxy, it’s likely to be 56-44 or 55-45.

    With regard to the Galaxy, and the interest rate question, when they ask “which of the following is MAINLY to blame?” I believe that many people would blame the govt to some extent, but, given 4 options, they have to decide which they blame most. This obviously produces a low “blame Howard” number.

  536. 536
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    With regard to the Galaxy, and the interest rate question, when they ask “which of the following is MAINLY to blame?”

    Why do they give options? Why don’t they just ask the question, and see what the persons first response is?

    As soon as you give options, it makes people think it is one thing or the other.

  537. 537
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Ratsak

    “The sailors of the Cinque Ports were granted “special privelages” by the Crown … ” “These “special privelages” [sic] entitled the men who fought to basically do what they wanted – they did not pay tax, and were (legally) entitled to take possession of any flotsam or plunder any captured enemy vessel.”
    Martin Grieve, 8 July 2006

    Sound like anyone you know ?? ;)

  538. 538
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Channel 10 news has just shown Kevin Rudd doing an interview on Chinese National Television in Mandarin.

  539. 539
    Tim
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Did anyone notice that John Howard did not mention union bosses once during his interview with Barry Cassidy on Insiders or have I begun to switch off that phrase?

  540. 540
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:24 pm | Permalink

    CL, I strongly suspect that Citizen Howard (as opposed to PM Howard) won’t be getting a Christmas card from Betty Windsor this year. I doubt she is a huge fan of his.

    I’ve also wondered just what she really thought of Ming.

  541. 541
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:25 pm | Permalink

    503 Greeensborough Growler Another good one Sherlock.

  542. 542
    judy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Mayoferal @ 488, ive been banned by that “shockjock” for daring to disagree with him over the Iraq war, i was quite polite and said as a war widow i had marched against our involvement, for my trouble i recieved a torrent of abuse and was told never to ring him again, if i remember rightly one of the more polite terms he called me was a terrorist sympathiser, i’m a rather quiet reserved person and never step into the public domain unless it’s important to me, ive spent far too much time in the public eye.
    actually i got a tiny bit of revenge and satisfaction when he approached me much later to come on the program to talk about Von Einam and his high jinks in gaol, i must admit i gleefully told him to get stuffed, but i put it a teensy bit cruder than that lol.

  543. 543
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    536, Mum complains about this sometimes; she really hates being put in one box. At the moment, only Morgan does anything in qualitative polling, and he gives comments from electors on some of his polls. None of the other pollsters do anything qualitative, it’s either this box or that box that people have to jump into. The parties would do more qualitative stuff which we don’t see much of.

  544. 544
    Lord D
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    539 Tim, it may be that Lib internals are showing that talking about unions isn’t resonating at all. The recent ACN said that 60% weren’t concerned by unions and 51% thought that Rudd would be able to handle them. This was published in Saturday’s Age, the day after the main poll results.

  545. 545
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    Julie 522 – If Howard loses, I don’t think he will be in any mood for conventions!! Anything could happen! :)

  546. 546
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Any predictions of the GG & Trash unlimited Corp. giving a resemblance of balanced coverage have been put to rest. Its ideology, not business considerations, that must be driving this agenda, Im sure they are losing many readers to fairfax over theyre shanahanagens.

  547. 547
    Burgey
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Thought I read on this site yesterday that ESJ has started a blog.

    Anyone got a link to it at all?

  548. 548
    Kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    524
    ruawake Says:
    November 5th, 2007 at 4:52 pm
    Just saw a national security ad – not a Govt ad anymore but authorised by Mock Keelty AFP.

    Sneaky Ratties.

    Crikey.com did hint that Howard might try and produce some big emotion grabbing wedge this week.

    Howard may think his only hope now is something drastic. The AFP raising the profile of National Security at the begining of the week tweaks my interest.

    Hopefully the Melbourne cup is nice and peaceful with no silly business.

  549. 549
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    C’mon, loosen up people!
    Maybe we ought to cut Glen a little slack here.
    His humanity towards Cornelia Rau is constrained only by the ugliness of his soul.

  550. 550
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Why is everyone so gung ho re tomorrow newspoll?

  551. 551
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    @549
    Nuff said.

  552. 552
    Fagin
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Am I the only one who thinks that the “authorised by B Loughnane Liberal Party Canberra” voiceover man has a scary, paternalistic voice? It’s a turn-off.

  553. 553
    TofK
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Not sure Gerr, maybe its just the election being less than 3 weeks away. No reason really.

  554. 554
    Burgey
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Gerr @550 – good question. Not like either party had a great week last week.

    May be because this year, whenever there’s beena coalition bounce, it’s bounced back straight away.

    Also, I think we were all pretty happy about Galaxy today.

  555. 555
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    3 weeks 3 weeks 3 weeks…I remember in 1983 waking up the day after and thinking that the birds should sound sweeter and the sun shinier….
    For mine, this one is for PJK (the real one)….

    Enough bluster, there’s still 3 weeks.

  556. 556
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    For those talking about the free $100 on sporting bet just remember you don’t get to claim the winnings. The way it works (as far as I know) is that you are allowed to re-invest the winnings from that $100. Say you bet $100 on Maxine @ $2.85 you get $185 credit WHEN she wins (sporting bet gets their free $100 back). With your $185 for could then bet it on a sure thing i.e Man Utd v. Derby and actually claim the winnings from that.

  557. 557
    HarryH
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    55-45 newspoll.

    it’s getting monotonous hey….

    3 weeks to go.

  558. 558
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    Gerr

    I am just going on my gut feeling, each time Newspoll has showed “The Narrowing” it bounces back.

    Morgan moved to ALP as did Galaxy. Newspoll tends to exagerate trends.

  559. 559
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Gerr,

    It is actually 456 hours and a few minutes. But who’s counting?

  560. 560
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Re Shanahan, I’m still really pissed with the way be manipulated the Newspoll figures on Saturday. Showing the predicted minus MOE in Lib favour as best case and pretending that the predicted result was the Libs worst case was truly disgraceful. By not including analysis of the predicted plus MOE he totally misrepresented the poll. Of course, his blog did not post my blog telling him this. What else can be done? Media Watch? Complaint to the Press Council with the findings sent on to Media Watch?

  561. 561
    Tim
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Geez – with the polls consistently showing around 55/45 all year, this blog generates a frenzy of activity with any minor fluctuation up or down. I’d hate to think about PB bandwidth problems if published polls had been running at 50/50!!

  562. 562
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @560 Dio

    We can use this forum to lampoon him until he starts to cry…or goes on the biggest loser – and wins – but not for the usual reasons….and cause he didled with the MOE of the televotes. And actually cause he fits the job description to a t.

  563. 563
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    If Shanahan did not exist, Murdoch would have to invent him.

  564. 564
    Kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes @ 560:
    I think they sell voodoo dolls of him now, so popular has he become.

    Hopefully from here on we have no national disaster ‘events’ aka Tampa or more attempted Haneefs. Howard has taken Australian politics low enough – I hope he doesn’t take it any lower.

  565. 565
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Nexus 6

    i just re-read the conditions at sportingbet – once maxine wins there appears to be NO need to bet again before withdrawal of your winnings

  566. 566
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    @546 Kina

    “Howard has taken Australian politics low enough – I hope he doesn’t take it any lower.”

    Why does a little voice inside me say ‘you aint seen nothin yet’?

  567. 567
    BV
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Hopefully from here on we have no national disaster ‘events’ aka Tampa or more attempted Haneefs. Howard has taken Australian politics low enough - I hope he doesn’t take it any lower.

    Of course they’re going to try something shocking.

  568. 568
    Historic Election
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Hey, u all probably know but the betting market narrowed somewhat furthur today to 1.32 to 3.35. Although Newspoll should be good, dont be too shocked if it moves to the govt

  569. 569
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:07 pm | Permalink

    565. Here’s the sportingbet condition:

    Prior to any withdrawal, both the deposit and any bonus funds accrued via Free Bets must be turned over at least once (1x).

  570. 570
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    The comments action is now moving elsewhere – all is explained here.

  571. 571
    steve
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Check out the spoof new Liberal Party Ad at ‘Road to surfdom’. Very funny.

  572. 572
    Lindsay voter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    Rather disappointed that Rudd’s homeless announcement didn’t get much publicity on Channel 9 at 6.00pm, nor 10 at 5.00pm from memory

  573. 573
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    “Community Services Minister Mal Brough has condemned Labor’s new pledge to tackle homelessness, saying it would fail to make a dent in addressing the problem.”

    What’s your answer Mal? Everyone lives with a social worker? :(

  574. 574
    Paisano
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    ruawake @ 509, i suspect a newspoll “widening” will be shannered as a ‘negative narrowing’

  575. 575
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    nexus yes – the free bet turnover is the maxine bet

  576. 576
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Judy wrote:

    Mayoferal @ 488, ive been banned by that “shockjock”

    I assume you mean the one now driving a gopher after a drink drive conviction. He wasn’t the one, though it sounds like he could have been.

    for daring to disagree with him over the Iraq war,

    Hmmm. Isn’t it interesting how the strongest advocates of war are those who’ve avoided being in one. I don’t remember seeing him in Vietnam. Or JWH, for that matter though he may have the excuse of his deafness.

    i’m a rather quiet reserved person

    Me too, until pushed too far. Which is why the one I crossed paths with is no longer in the media. Even ‘faux’ citizens can have powerful friends!

    I should add that I was polite during the exchange because I had assumed the wider implications of creating two classes of citizens hadn’t been thought through. It wasn’t until the “So what” response that I realised I was dealing with xenophobia. I got kicked off before I could say more.

  577. 577
    Arbie Jay
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    First ever Melvourne Cup parade without horses thanks to rattus stuffy upius.

    Will be first ever major sporting event that said Rattus has deliberatley stayed away from, what happened to man of steel, frightened by the reaction he might get from the crowd.

    Only rabbitts in this campaign are the scared liitle liberal bunnies ducking in and out of burrows as they avoid the media amd anything with the word liberal on it.

  578. 578
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    William – that Crikey thing is a bit weird … I’m sure you know your own business well but …

  579. 579
    LaborVoter
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    Predictions on Shanahan Newspoll Headings:

    Howard makes spectacular comeback, now only 10 points behind Labor

    Interest Rate fears fail to dent Coalition vote

    Labor Leader at highest disapproval in 7 months

    Howard surges on Preferred PM

    Labor lead flatlines on interest rate fears

    The Narrowing continues(Now only 10% gap)

    Rate Rise not a worry for voters, Howards approval unchanged

    Coalition closes in on Labor, up 1%

  580. 580
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    otiose, just sayin’ because the bloke I work with signed up during the World Cup and won from the bonus but couldn’t withdraw it – he had to re-invest it. From that I’d assume the bonus is what you accrue when Maxine wins, not the hundred you get for free – so the bonus is the $185 “profit”.

    I could well be wrong but going in his experience I suspect not.

  581. 581
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Whack your winnings from Maxine on the CFMEU Canberra Raiders to win the NRL Premiership. :)

  582. 582
    otiose
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    nexus6

    condition 6 from sportingbet

    “Prior to any withdrawal, both the deposit and any bonus funds accrued via Free Bets must be turned over at least once (1x).”

    this isn’t blinding obvious but my son who works at a sports betting site assures me that the maxine win clears the funds for withdrawal ;)

  583. 583
    CL de Footscray
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    Otiose – I’m glad you said that. I’m really looking forward to free money … I’m not going to win anything by betting my $30 on the ALP to form government (well, @$1.33 I’ll win about $10) but the $260 for Max is what I’m really hanging out for!

  584. 584
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    OK…..though I hope I don’t win mine (I put the $100 on the coalition @ $3.30 to soften the blow of a loss). My $30 signup went on Maxine.

    Maxine wins, coalition loses = very happy, slightly richer
    Maxin loses, coalition loses = still very happy
    Maxine wins, coalition loses = a little sad, a good deal richer
    Maxine loses, coalition wins = it could be worse. Australia’s screwed but I’m better off – I’ll feel just like a good little Lib.

  585. 585
    Scorpio
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Hell, I loved this little bit in this article from Forbes.

    {As the six-week campaign passes the half-way mark, doubts about Howard’s personal honesty have arisen in his own marginal Sydney seat of Bennelong, with a poll released Monday showing he has been unable to shed his ‘lying rodent’ nickname.

    A poll of 76 Bennelong voters by The Australian newspaper found that many had qualms about Howard’s truthfulness after his 11 years in the top job.

    ‘Several respondents referred to Mr. Howard as a lying rodent,’ the paper said, in reference to the nickname reportedly given to the prime minister by one of his senators in 2001.}

    http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2007/11/04/afx4298259.html

  586. 586
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    Any inside word on whether newspoll will get a leak at 7:30?

    My prediciton is the election is finely balanced. Because for some dopey reason newspoll gets the most attention in the media (despite it’s bizarre movements), if the poll coumes out 54% it may just kill off the Libs. It would mean only 2 Tuesday newspolls to go, and it’s getting damn close to time running out.

  587. 587
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Newspolls are rarely leaked at 7.30….god im looking forward to that and lateline tonite.

  588. 588
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    What’s with all the ‘looking down your noses’ at us social workers going on earlier here? I doubt very much that those doing it, could hack what myself and my colleagues in mental health do, day in , day out. You try being on call 24/7, responding professionally, humanely and as helpfully as possible to the sad, the mad and the bad.
    Onya, Mayo, good for you.
    Newspoll- 58 The Obliterators, 42 The Losers.
    Think the Galaxy result pretty much what I expected.

  589. 589
    barney
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    NBN in Newcastle is awash with Bob Baldwin ads:

    A bevy of local “identities” are trotted out to support Bob.

    The thrust is he’s a “good bloke” and he works “locally”. the pitch is “re-elect Bob”.

    There is zero, repeat zero, (including in the acknowledgements at the end) mention of the Liberal party.

  590. 590
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s policy on reducing homelessness got a gurnsey on the ABC news. Please note, Glen, people with mental health problems vote. Their families and connections vote.

  591. 591
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:28 pm | Permalink

    I think if newspoll is ever going to be 53-47 it’ll be tonight.

    The polling would have started on Friday night -so the Garrett thing may hav had some resonance.

  592. 592
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    barney

    Patterson is in the bag, don’t worry. :)

  593. 593
    cb
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    what’s with the new thread? william’s going to crikey????

  594. 594
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    William must have his reasons – be fair. But it would be sad if PB and PC end up hosted by big business.

    But hay these guys have got to make a quid – maybe Bill Bowe could replace Shanahananan at the Oz. ;)

  595. 595
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    7:30 had nothing new – just another mention of Galaxy.

    And please more sightings of Vale on a skateboard. That must be worth 1000 under 21 years votes for the ALP every time.

  596. 596
    Nostradamus
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    53/47 for Newspoll to bring Howard within an angstrom of victory

  597. 597
    cb
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    Well I don’t know about anyone else but I’ve already exhausted my free ticket on crikey in a 6 month period – there you go – Thanks William anyway for the most informative blog I’ve ever read – Byeeeee

  598. 598
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Nostrils

    Labor can win the election with 49.7% of the TPP vote. :-P

  599. 599
    Matt
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    cb : Just enter your name and email to make a comment as usual on the new site, sign-up doesn’t seem to be required. Failing that set up a new email (Hotmail or the like) so you can register.

  600. 600
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    CB, that might not be an issue, as you can see here. If it is, I’ll inquire to see if something can be done about it.

  601. 601
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    My only concern about the crikey blog will be the “moderation”. Any idea how long it will take for a post to come up?

  602. 602
    Matt
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    Actually scratch my comment @ 599, although the bit about creating a new email address stands.

  603. 603
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    Grog, no time at all – comments go live immediately. Unfortunately, you are given a contrary impression when you post a comment, another on the long list of things that will need to be addressed.

  604. 604
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Excellent (I actually donated some money yesterday on paypal – but I’ll call it money spent for services already rendered)

  605. 605
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    One other problem with the Crikey blog is that anyone has has a previous trial or former subscription (me), are not able to register in order to participate on the blog.

  606. 606
    comicstriphero
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/files/newspoll-5nov.pdf

    This is on the Oz website – is this the new poll!?!? 53-47

  607. 607
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    The real figure is around 55/45 so the Newspoll will be one point either side or dead b,

  608. 608
    Noocat
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    I see others have already raised this issue. I did try to register but it failed, so I guess the only way around it is to get a new email address. Or is it possible to switch off registration?

  609. 609
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Comicstriphero, that is the marginal seats poll which they ran on Saturday.

  610. 610
    Julie
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    William,

    DO not know if someone has already commented on this or not, so apologies if so.

    I registered there late this afternoon and only got a chance for about a 5 minute look see before I needed to turn the computer over the kids for their turn [time share arrangements in this house ;-) ].

    My main complaint is that the comments read bottom up, forcing you to go all the way to the bottom and scan up; complete and utter opposite from here. Can that be fixed to read top/bottom the way that we are all used to?

  611. 611
    mytym
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    Did you notice that the Herald Sun reported the coalitions primary drop of 1% as unchanged and the 2% gap increase in 2 party preferred as unchanged also?

  612. 612
    barney
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    ruawake,

    i wasn’t worried. i was reporting not panicing. :)

    One of the many schadenfreude moments i look forward to on the 24th is to see Bib Bob lose.

  613. 613
    comicstriphero
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    William,

    Ok then. Just that it had ‘5 Nov’ in the file title.

    Getting edgy, me.

  614. 614
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    ok I sent the same message 4 times as I refreshed the page looking to update it – not realising that it must have updated. Interesting refreshing the page reposts the data.

  615. 615
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    I know better now. ;]

  616. 616
    Grog
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    comicstriphero, don’t do that to me!

  617. 617
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    And, and , and Crikey, they ate Glen.

  618. 618
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    GG, Glen disappeared up his own orifice, as is perfectly fitting.

  619. 619
    cb
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for your reply (at 600) William.

    I have only the upmost respect for you and what you do and that’s why I am concerned that your post is going to Crikey – Crikey is not free to air – lots of bloggers will lbe blocked and thats the shame of it.
    Nonetheless, good luck and I appreciate the amazing work that you’ve done.

  620. 620
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    CB, if by “not free to air” you mean that every post will be moderated, that is not the case. Provided this issue with one trial a year can be sorted, I don’t see any reason why things can’t continue much as they have here.

  621. 621
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    Just about there – all that it requires is to be as free functioning as this one which I gather is already being dealt with. The word limit and the submiting/refreshing page trap a few have discovered.

    It is all fine by me.

  622. 622
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    Completely agree about the fantastic work William. Im amazed you could undertake this with the other demands on your time (Ive also done a PhD) and the ever present threat of legal action. BTW, has a blogger or blogsite ever been successfully sued in Australia?

  623. 623
    cb
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 8:56 pm | Permalink

    William I’m not talking about censorship, I’m talking about getting online with Crikey – that’s all

    Getting online is a hassle in itself and if you”ve already had a free trial at Crikey you can’t get on again unless you want to fiddle the books (email acc)

    William I think your postings are the best blogs I’ve read – don’t let them be inaccessible

  624. 624
    judy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

    Mayoferal, thankyou for the reply, yes the person you mentioned is the one i clashed with, i too have good friends in state parliament and the media who would have been only too pleased to sort things out for me and demand an apology– but what the heck, i didnt want one from him, it would have been an insult, besides his big mouth got him into some legal trouble not long afterwards, i believe he has been told not to drink on air nowadays.
    he is very vocal in his support for Howard along with his blue rinse set of rusted on listeners and rubbishes anyone who has a diferent opinion, i never bother to turn my radio on until midnight any more, i love this site and i cant thank William enough for making it possible, i blog very little {i havnt much confidence unless i’m fired up} but i read every entry here, along with Crickey it’s my favourite destination.
    Michael OConnell the commissioner for victims rights and Mike Rann wrote to Howard early this year about the abuse, by sections of the media, of the law that you cant sue on the behalf of a dead person, they never even recieved a reply, i’m hoping that Rudd has a more humanitarian side and victims Australia wide will be treated better, i was one of the people who set up the first victim support service in the world here in Adelaide, i was honoured when Chris Summner took a paper i wrote to a UN seminar on victimology some years ago, i think it was my proudest moment.

  625. 625
    Snakeboy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:03 pm | Permalink

    # 596 – Nostro, your angstrom just got run over by your karma.

  626. 626
    cynic
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    two things

    howard claims he cant control prices
    ever heard of the Prices Justification Tribunal -quaint body that MADE business justify its price increases (maybe thats why they called it that) scrapped by The Rodentcy

    Whatever happened to the “intervention”
    basically we are the stage where we allow the Libs to reinstall apartheid in the top end-must be all those nuclear waste dumps being commissioned in the NT

  627. 627
    El Nino
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    In their desire to be a MSM staple with their own brand of me-tooism, Crikey are limiting comment to those rich enough to splurge on a Crikey subscription or those tech-savvy enough to get around the free subscription thing. Either way, they have limited the openess of this blog and skewing the content. Possum Comitatus continuned to blog to both Crikey and his own site. William, perhaps that is the way to go. If the rabble at the gate of the citadel sign up for two free weeks @ Crikey, they will be comfortably out of the way for the last week of the election.

  628. 628
    kina
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    I guess it is an interesting experiment as it will reveal how the blogosphere functions and thrives.

  629. 629
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    William, much as it might pain you, there is such a thing as too much change, and as others have indicated, we’d rather support you to continue this site. And put our money where our moutn is.

  630. 630
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, mouth. I’ve no idea where our moutn is. Perhaps someone in the LNP knows. God knows, only they know how to rule, run the economy (badly), blah, blah, blah.

  631. 631
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    agree with #629,Harry.
    The Crikey site is too confusing!!!!!!!!!

  632. 632
    Don Wigan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    #560 Diogenes

    Re Shanahan, I’m still really pissed with the way be manipulated the Newspoll figures on Saturday. Showing the predicted minus MOE in Lib favour as best case and pretending that the predicted result was the Libs worst case was truly disgraceful.

    I’m a bit late picking up these posts with work commitments … so excuse me if this has already been answered. I heard Antony Green and Galaxy’s Peter Briggs on The World Today on the car radio. Antony very politely took up your concern. He said nobody, at least nobody he knew, tried to interpret polls using worst-case scenarios maximised through Margin of Error. On Antony’s own reading of the marginal seats mentioned, related to the known swings, Labor would win 88 seats in the election. Briggs was also asked for comment. He said he could only agree with Antony’s interpretation.

    Briggs also said he believed Howard was gone, even though the polling lead to McKew was not huge. He based that on the fact that three polls had now been held over a large space of time, and all had come up with identical results.

  633. 633
    Crispy Here
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    sooo… William, in an hour will there be a Newspoll thread here as well as over at CrikeyBludger? I’ve got both open with those little Explorer tabs… but it’s weirdness…

  634. 634
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Might I suggest a bifurcating and suppurating in the LNP from here on out? Diogenes, despite you looking down your nose at social workers, do you have a comment?

  635. 635
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Crispy, the action will be entirely here.

  636. 636
    Trevor
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll just released – Primary Vote Coalition 42% (unchanged) ALP 47% (down 1%). 2PP Coalition 47% (up 1%) ALP 53% (down 1%).

    Preferred PM – Howard 43% (up 2%) Rudd 47% (down 1%)

  637. 637
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    Ripper, William. Just give us a heads up when you need some cash. Very much appreciate your work.

  638. 638
    Don Wigan
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:57 pm | Permalink

    Hey Judy

    Here’s another bit of West Adelaide trivia for you going way back to 1953 at the Football Carnival held at Adelaide then. (My good old Dad took my brothers and self along to three of the games. And I had an amazing memory for trivia then, now alas gone.)

    Among the Football Budget souvenirs I can remember was a photo of 7 members of the famous West Adelaide 1947 premiership team participating at the Carnival. But only 3 (Brian Faeshe, Colin Brown and Jack Lynch) were current West Adelaide players. What about the others?

    Well in South Australian uniforms were Fos Williams (by then Port Adelaide) and Don Taylor (by then Glenelg).

    In the West Australian uniform was Reg Zeuner.

    In the Victorian uniform was the great Bernie Smith, by then with Geelong, and the 1951 Brownlow Medallist.

    I bet you didn’t know that, but some of your family would have.

  639. 639
    Let It End
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    632 Don Wigan

    Must say I’m very pleased to hear Antony exposed shameahans shenanigans. I’ve listened to Antony for many years and must say I still don’t know if he leans left or right, nor do I care. Antony is a very respected and publicly unbiased analyst unlike shameahan who has no credibility or respect whatever.

    Don, your news on Briggs, a big supporter of the PM, believing Howard is gone has made my night. :-)

  640. 640
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Trevor, #636,
    Is this worrying?
    I have a nagging feeling that the libs will pull something out of the bag.
    My wife is confident of a ALP victory, but Iam not so sure. Call me cynical if you will.

  641. 641
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Bloody Agenda. A whole bunch of Howard huggers on there gushing over him. amazing. At least Imre had it right. He still believes Howard is gone.

  642. 642
    Trevor
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Whilst I’m not overly confident I’m sure that if the ALP primary vote stays where it is, I can’t see how the ALP can possibly lose. The closer the polls are now I reckon the more likely people will gravitate towards ALP closer to election date to ensure that Howard is not returned.

  643. 643
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Trevor this poll shows no real movement. One percent here and there in polling is not significant. Really nothing has changed from the last newspoll.

  644. 644
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    But aren’t we ASSUMING that the primaries will not change? I must admit , that I have no great faith in the average voter, they are far too blase to look at the real issues, and only interested as to what will come into their hip pocket

  645. 645
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    Fancy even talking about the narrowing with a poll like this. Imre had it right when said that these polls have done this over the year. It wouldn’t surprise to see Labor’s vote go up.

  646. 646
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Nothing in this poll Will is suggesting any change in primary vote.

  647. 647
    Trevor
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    Will, I understand how you feel but if we get Howard returned again, I’ll be very disappointed for this country and the word “fair” can be removed from all dictionaries. It will show how we have become a greedy society with no compassion for our fellow countrymen.

    I have faith that enough will do what is required on 24/11/2007.

  648. 648
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    I think I can sleep better then?

  649. 649
    judy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Don i knew Fos very well, Colin Brown was my hero but best of all as a real littley i adored Clarry “bang bang” Cannon, Jimmy Wright was special too, they were heady innocent days, one of my daughters goes to the clubrooms every saturday night, she wouldnt miss it.
    William if you need a donation just yell, theres enough of us here to keep you going, after all this is our home from home.

  650. 650
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Labor’s advertising has just begun and the interest rate hike looks like taking place. This poll is still a shocker for the Libs at this stage of the campaign.

  651. 651
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    i don’t want Howard returned either, but he always seems to manage a catastrophe of some sort to get the voters back on his side. He is just sleazy and sneaky enough to “conjure” another scare for the voters.
    Like many posters here, I long to see the end of the most immoral, corrupt government this country has ever seen, but I just can’t help but feel that he has form on his side……like trying to turn the inevitable interest rate hike to his advantage…the “interest rate rise we have to have”.
    I am so scared for this country, I just want to go to sleep until it is all over.

  652. 652
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    Lateline tonight..the coalition and the PM clawing back some ground…….not much, but clawing it back.

  653. 653
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    Howard and co the only ones able to steer Australia through these troubled times?
    Give me a break!!!!!!!!!!!
    “now is not the time to replace an experienced government with an inexperienced one”
    “these thing are outside the control of the government”
    I feel SO sick!!!!!!!!!!!

  654. 654
    judy
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    oh dear, i keep repeating “i will not panic, i will not panic” — surely we cant lose out sooo close to the home post! how on earth can Rudd look so relaxed and easy about it all???? Judy mutters as she stomps off to make a little wax doll of Howard and stick pins in it.

  655. 655
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    lateline 53-47 Labors stuffed with 3 long weeks to go.

  656. 656
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    What are you people on? There is statistically no change. The Libs primary vote hasn’t moved.

  657. 657
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Gerr are you aware that such a result would still be an easy win to Labor?

  658. 658
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Gary! Iam going to bed somewhat calmed down, and after listening to Anthony Green on lateline, I feel a bit better as well.
    By the way, does EVERYBODY go to bed at this time of night?

  659. 659
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    It’s mighty quiet here tonight Will. I think it may have to do with the changes being made here.

  660. 660
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    But there is no action on Crikey, either. Unless some more people get on here somewhat quick smart, I am going to join my wife in bed!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  661. 661
    will
    Posted Monday, November 5, 2007 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    THAT’S IT!!!!!!!!!! I AM GOING!
    GOODNIGHT ALL.

  662. 662
    Posted Tuesday, November 6, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    HarryH (530) My post addressed an insidious tendency of some posters to offensively categorise sections of the voting population as ‘greedy’ or ‘lacking compassion’. To observe that tendency is, itself, divisive, and self indulgent is not controversial.