Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Morgan phone poll: 56-44

Morgan has published results of a large-sample phone poll of 1670 respondents, “including 1,025 electors in 22 key L-NP marginal seats”. This has focused on seven such seats in New South Wales, pointing to a swing of 7.7 per cent, four in Victoria for 4.8 per cent, four in Queensland for 13.9 per cent, three in South Australia for 6.6 per cent, two in Tasmania for 9.9 per cent, and two in Western Australia for a swing of 3.1 per cent away from Labor. I am unsure on what basis Morgan has arrived at the conclusion that “the ALP looks set to win between 14 and 24 seats”. We are told without explanation that the swing in NSW is “not uniform” and that “the L-NP could still hold Bennelong, Dobell and Wentworth”, without any corresponding allowance for Labor gaining seats outside the range. Despite the swing in South Australia, it is apparently the case that Labor might not win Wakefield, which I find extremely difficult to believe. The overall result of the poll is a 46.5 per cent primary vote for Labor and 40 per cent for the Coalition, for a two-party preferred result of 56-44. It would require tremendous creativity to build a scenario from these figures that would only deliver Labor 14 seats.

678 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 514 » Show All

  1. 101
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    I’ll just take the 56% TPP and let you guys worry about the marginals.

    I think Roy Morgan has shares in Poll Bludger and needed to keep the hits up by making stupid observations on seat by seat

  2. 102
    Erytnicam
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:15 pm | Permalink

    Every time the real Kevin Rudd comes out in these sort of interviews, I REALLY like the bugger. The prepackaged “ALP Kevin Rudd TM” we’ve been seeing all election annoys me all the more when you see that he actually seems quite a decent bloke as is.

  3. 103
    Grog
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:16 pm | Permalink

    No one ever goes back and checks the marginal polls – when pollsters want to claim accuracy, its total primary and 2PP or nothing. The rest is bollocks.

  4. 104
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Exactly, Grog.

    Expect all 4 pollsters to release mega-samples of national TPP on Friday, as it will be those polls that everyone will remember…

  5. 105
    Ron Brown
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Lord D #57
    IF one wants to accept Morgan’s total figure 56% 2 PP covering 22 marginal seats & ignore the seat & state 2 ppp %’s ,

    THEN one has to the SAME for Galaxy’s Poll which shows in total NATIONALLY over the 20 marginal’s polled as Labor 2 PP of 50.8% ie. only a 4.5% swing

    IN TOTAL NATIONALLY , the difference between Morgan’s 56% 2 PP
    vs Galaxy’s 50.8% 2 PP is disturbing (and defies logic)

  6. 106
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    Morgan do publish the figures they have on a seat by seat.

    Go to thier home page and click the purple box and follow the links

    Currently every Marginal has ALP ahead

    even Canning is 49/51

  7. 107
    Triffid
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    I’ve only seen that annoying “ding” advertisement & anti-Workchoices here in Adelaide tonight.

    I think its really time to drop the former – its is becoming very annoying – and replace it with something a bit more positive, forward looking & upbeat.

  8. 108
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    106- in WA I mean

  9. 109
    Grog
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    In ACT the ALP since 8pm have run a lot of ads on Channel 10 (es I have Oz Idol on)- the whinging wendy one, the blue collar worker one and the street sign work-choices further one.

    The Libs have had the $80b debt one, and the interst rates one on pretty high rotation, but not as many since 8pm.

  10. 110
    Triffid
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Anyone with any insights into what tactics either party might use over the remaining campaign? Change in style of advertising for the remaing 2 days?

  11. 111
    Bob from Bonner
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:22 pm | Permalink

    Aussieguru at 87
    I’m already on record saying the same thing including Fisher.The north is coming over as well,both Herbert and Leichhardt are on the way over as well.Keep a close watch on Petrie,I think Gambaro is in for a real shock as will some other Coalition members.LOL!!!!!!

  12. 112
    libsrok
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    esj. are you now saying our bet is off? why ? chicken?

  13. 113
    mad cow
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:24 pm | Permalink

    Did anyone catch the votingrecord ad?

  14. 114
    GG
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Re wakefield. apparently Howard’s office is breifing journalists that the Coalition is ahead in internal polling for that seat.

  15. 115
    Kiwipundit
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    Swing Lowe @ 104 – you’re right about that! I’ll wait with bated breath on Friday for those last marginal seats polls – after all there’s still 6 days to go until the election.

  16. 116
    mad professor
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    In this final week, Rudd has to forget everything else and go in hard on the climate. This issue will trump everything else the conservatives will throw at him. It’s his biggest trump card

  17. 117
    Luke Skywalker
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    I understand the sample is small, but the Victorian result tallies with current on the ground experience. Deakin, McEwen, La Trobe, and Corangamite are all close but will not get there. Deakin has a Your Rights at Work campaign, but Baressi is a tough nut to crack. Symon’s is a good candidate in any election other than one on Industrial Relations, and Labor is looking for 4.8% but not matching the government in local spending. McEwen doesn’t have a Your Rights at Work campaign, the Labor candidate is alright, but Bailey is a great campaigner and Labor is looking for a 7% swing. Jason Wood is the worst Liberal MP/candidate of the bunch, and will be the one to go. There is a Your Rights at Work campaign, and a good Labor candidate in Cox, but not enough work has been done at the Berwick end of the seat. Also, the former ALP candidate has stuck their head up too, and at 5.8%, this doesn’t help. Corangamite has an ancient Liberal MP, and should already be pencilled in, but the Labor candidate matches Jason Wood in terms of being very poor. Possibly, another candidate would have done much better. Gavan O’Connor is a problem here too. The margin is 5.4% and reports suggest Labor has been even more unsighted in the Geelong end of the seat than the Berwick end of La Trobe. It does have a Your Rights at Work campaign, which will get the margin down but this will not be enough.

  18. 118
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    As I am at another place, I did see commercial TV. On the Cricket, switched over to ABC. Einstein. And ABC from there.

    Saw Labor ads, only.

    Labor. Concise, to the point. Reality.

    If there were LNP Ads, must have blanked out.

  19. 119
    Samuel K
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    Just spoke to a friend who is fairly high in the C’wth public service. Very interesting. Apparently the department head is telling her to read papers by Tanner and Swan. She reports that her department has been in overdrive like never before – preparing for a new government.

    Bodes well – but isn’t definitive I guess.

  20. 120
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    78 Paul,

    No u r wrong I was the last post. Not the terms I offered so declined.

    Interesting only libsrok took up my proposition no one else was prepared to put up or shut up that the Newspoll 2PP would be better than 53-47 for Labor. Interesting.

    Wiliam is the terms I have negotiated with libsrok acceptable?

  21. 121
    AM
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Luke Skywalker

    Are you looking for Darth Howard?

  22. 122
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    GG@114,

    If Wakefield is held by the Coalition, it will be one of the biggest upsets this election. I’ll give you a brief overview of the seat-by-seat betting on Wakefield at the major bookies:

    Sportingbet: LAB $1.05/ LIB $7.50
    Portlandbet: LAB $1.05/ LIB $8.00
    Centrebet: LAB $1.04/ LIB $8.25

    Btw, Centrebet has come down on the federal result from $1.19/$4.75 to $1.24/$4.10 today. Sportingbet has come down to (from $1.20/$4.50 to $1.22/$4.25)

  23. 123
    Triffid
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    GG @ 114.

    Where’d you get that?

    Sounds like nonsense.

    Based on all publically available polling things would have had to change a massive amount overnight.

  24. 124
    Kiwipundit
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    GG,

    I bet that poll would be like that so-called Eden-Monaro internal poll they had in early September – a made up “qualitative” Crosby/Textor poll to keep the Liberal staff, campaign workers and backbench MPs morale up.

  25. 125
    Luke Skywalker
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    No, but I wish I could use the force to influence the result…

  26. 126
    RGee
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    Luke @ 117

    Corangamite has an ancient Liberal MP, and should already be pencilled in, but the Labor candidate matches Jason Wood in terms of being very poor. Possibly, another candidate would have done much better. Gavan O’Connor is a problem here too.

    Ummm… Gavan O’Conner is in Corio up against Marles.

  27. 127
    Turlow
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    Triffid @ 110

    No insights but a strong suspicion we’re in for a whole lot of non-core fear pandering policy announcements of the tough on ‘them’ variety from the LNP. Howard is chasing the wedge issue dragon. Labor will rely on variations of the successful ‘time is up’ message. Change of tactics at this stage is definitely only for the desperate.

  28. 128
    Marko
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    I was down working with a branch of the public service in Canberra this week – and I can tell you that yes, they’re all working overtime, and they fully expect that there will be a change of government. Apparently Rudd really is serious about putting the machinery to work at full tilt before Christmas – there was even some talk about calling Parliament back in mid-December. (I don’t even know if this can be done legally – have all the Writs been returned?)

    The biggest question on the minds of the various public service folks was: can they get all this legislation through the various review offices in time?

  29. 129
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    Telling, Samuel K, at 119.

    Looks like, you betcha.

    Someone referred to a Laurie Oakes article, Bulletin, Roof Top Strategy per Saigon, Labor much years ago, waterproofing. Earlier thread. Have a look.

    Applicable, Libs?

  30. 130
    Grog
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    mad cow – the votingrecord on Gary Nairn has got big play here – it’s one the ALP’s best.

    But I think the bloke in the blue shirt saying “sorry mate, not this time” is the best.

  31. 131
    libsrok
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    esj. i gotta get ready & go to work i trust our bet is on. cya tommorow

  32. 132
    Pi
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    120 Edward StJohn Says: November 18th, 2007 at 8:30 pm

    Interesting only libsrok took up my proposition no one else was prepared to put up or shut up that the Newspoll 2PP would be better than 53-47 for Labor. Interesting.

    Don’t equate no response because of anything other than people ignoring you. Newpoll will be at least 55/45, and probably 56/44.

  33. 133
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps it’s best to pay the following odds no mind. Afterall, Eden-Monaro is only a bellweather seat top-heavy with atheists, druggies, dole bludgers and Un-Australians.

    Eden-Monaro (NSW) – Winning Candidate
    KELLY, Mike (ALP) 1.12
    NAIRN, Gary (LIB) 5.25

  34. 134
    Steph
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Labor ads are running heavily in the lead-up to Rudd’s appearance on Rove.

  35. 135
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    Labor’s tied with the Libs in Corangamite on Sportingbet – I think this the first time Labor has ever tied with the Libs in this seat on any betting site this election…

  36. 136
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:37 pm | Permalink

    Is Ozymandias on site?

    National Interest, ABC Radio, featured the seat today.

  37. 137
    Luke Skywalker
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:37 pm | Permalink

    Rgee, yes, O’Connor is in Corio, but without knowing Geelong that well, I’m sure the buckets of mud he is throwing are wrecking the Labor name in the area. You can smell it in Melbourne, and therefore, you can probably smell it in Colac.

  38. 138
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Oh, and Labor is up in Page on both Centrebet and Sportingbet now. I believe this is also the first time that this seat has “fallen” on any of the bookie sites…

  39. 139
    Burgey
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    ESJ – I’d have gladly taken the $100 bet, but the 6 rate rises since 04 have so eateninto my household budget that I don’t have a spare $100 to lob on what would otherwise be a sure thing.

    Sorry to William, his site is well worth a donation.

  40. 140
    AM
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    Article from Fair News Australia

    It’ll be a Labor Landslide

    Any analysis based on past election results – as this one is – requires a rough estimate of what the final 2PP (Two-Party Preferred) vote will be. To do this, we will tabulate and graph the Newspoll results from 1993 to 2007, for the final 5 or 6 weeks in each campaign.

    The tabular data looks like this:

    See Link

    http://fairnews.com.au/content/view/58/1/

  41. 141
    mad cow
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:42 pm | Permalink

    grog I saw the tail end of the votingrecord ad, this time aimed at Bob Baldwin. Did yours go “thinking of voting Bob Baldwin?.. think again” ?

    First time I’ve actually seen a neg ad directly naming Bob. Are they gonna do more of these? How often are they running it in EM?

  42. 142
    K Jin
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Speaking Of Darth Vader
    Gough is looking a lot like Vader with his helmet off in the end of Jedi

  43. 143
    Grog
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    yep mad cow – I might even checkout votingrecord.com.au

  44. 144
    RyanVoter
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    Ryan is in play for the ALP, national office is spending money here and dedicating resoures. this is a 10% plus seat so I would think Greater Brisbane Tory seats are in dep deep deep doo doos!!

  45. 145
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:51 pm | Permalink

    From the http://www.votingrecord.com.au site, it seems that it’s going to be targeted against NSW and Queensland incumbents only. There’s no voting record on display for Coalition incumbents in other states.

    Is this because Workchoices is biting more in these states than the others? Coz I reckon if they ran these voting record ads in Sydney on high rotation, it would be a sure-fire vote-winner…

  46. 146
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Possum Comitatus Says:

    BillBowe says “It would require tremendous creativity to build a scenario from these figures that would only deliver Labor 14 seats.”

    It’s the soft voter deflater wot does it!

    Who will offer soft swingers free viagara? Adds a whole new meaning to “pork”.

  47. 147
    Lose the election please
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    I suppose the most encouraging thing for Labor supporters is that Rudd isn’t acting as he would be if they were not in front in a majority of seats. If they were behind he’d be acting more drastically, promising more money and hitting the marginals with lots of targetted spending. Instead this is what we’re seeing from John Howard. I have a feeling that if Labor thought they were behind we’d be seeing much more dramatic announcements coming from their direction and a lot less caution.

    The most encouraging thing for Coalition supporters is that these marginal polls tend to at least allow the possibility that the swings aren’t occuring in the right places. It’s possible that the swings in one or two marginals per state are so high that it counters negligible swings in other seats. Couple this with polls we’ve seen of Lilley, Adelaide and Kingston (? I think) which show huge swings to Labor in their held seats and it certainly makes it a possibility that the Coalition could just scrape back in. Once again, this isn’t the most likely outcome, but certainly possible. I know I won’t be popular for acknowledging this but that’s fine with me.

  48. 148
    Grog
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s on Rove

  49. 149
    paul k
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    Rudd is on Rove now.

  50. 150
    mad cow
    Posted Sunday, November 18, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    SL, odd

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 514 » Show All