Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Galaxy: 52-48

More than one commenter reports that Paul Bongiorno has indicated on the Channel Ten News has reported tomorrow’s Galaxy poll at “52-46”, a most unfortunately timed slip of the tongue. We will presumably know soon enough whether he meant 54-46 or 52-48.

UPDATE: Thanks to Adelaide readers for confirming it as 52-48.

TWO-PARTY PRIMARY
ALP LNP ALP LNP
Nov 23
52 48 ? ?
Nov 4
54 46 45 42
Oct 19
53 47 45 43
Sept 24
56 44 46 40
Aug 27
57 43 47 39
July 30
54 46 44 41
July 2
55 45 46 41
June 4
53 47 44 42
May 14
57 43 49 39
April 23
58 42 49 37

NOTE: Please exercise some common sense when speculating on poll results in comments. For the love of God, do not leave comments like “ACN 50-50″ and then, 10 minutes and 115 comments later, say “oh sorry, that was only a prediction”.

147 Comments

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All

  1. 101
    SirEggo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Ladies and Gentlemen I am officially confused

    How can in the same period of time galaxy come into 52-48, and ACN go to 57-43?

    *Scratches head*

    *Befuddled look on face*

  2. 102
    Max
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    Very simple SirEggo. Both are within the margin of error. Combine the two and you get 54.5 which, give or take, is what the polls have been saying for some time now.

  3. 103
    Burgey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Wait for the primaries.

    Apparently the Tele is leading with a banner “It’s Time for a Change – We’re Voting for Rudd”.

  4. 104
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:32 pm | Permalink

    acn 57-43 cf Possum

  5. 105
    LaborVoter
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    “Bull Butter” – Sounds like something a 6 year old would say

    52% is NOT a win for Labor either, maybe high 52% but not 52% flat.

  6. 106
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    If it was high 52 then it would be reported as 53%. It’s between 51.5 and 52.4

  7. 107
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    galaxy are probably already working on their “lindsay affair caused late minute swing” story

  8. 108
    BrissyRod
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Wasnt Galaxy the most accurate in 2004?

  9. 109
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    rumours of galaxy push polling (again) with a “too close to the unions” question…

  10. 110
    Thommo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:55 pm | Permalink

    Remember people. Galaxy was THE most accurate at the last election. Saturday will be close….

  11. 111
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 6:58 pm | Permalink

    Well, no surprise that the Herald Sun is backing Howard. I could see that coming from a long way off:

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/

    With the Tele backing Rudd, it looks like News Ltd is having a bet each way.

  12. 112
    Thommo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    Prediction – Newspoll and ACN will lose credibility after this election.

  13. 113
    LaborVoter
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:06 pm | Permalink

    Prediction: They will all be wrong and Labor will get 53% TPP

  14. 114
    BMWofVictoria
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Is it possible that Galaxy have polled seats higher up the Pendulum

  15. 115
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    I think it’s been repeated over and over again.

    Galaxy was closest to the 2PP result. ACN was closest to the ALP primary but overestimated the Coalition primary.

    Morgan was close to both the Coalition and ALP primaries. Newspoll was out of whack, but not too bad on the primaries.

    In other words, if you look at all of them and particularly the primaries they’re not far off. This year will be different.

  16. 116
    mytym
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    Mark my words. Galaxy will be the one losing credibility and thrown in the scrap heap with Morgan. They consistently understate ALP BY 2% primary & overstate the Libs by 2% primary. They are a joke!

  17. 117
    Thommo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    I will mark those words mytm.

  18. 118
    blindoptimist
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Both Galaxy and ACN could be “right” in the sense that their results are similar, within the usual MoE. Newspoll is also likely to be close to the final result. The result will probably be around 55/45, very close to the averaged result for all the polls. The Newspoll cumulative result state by state is 56/44, even closer to the averaged result.

    If the final 2PP is anything below 52/48 or higher than 58/42, you’d have to say they all got it wrong and start questioning the value of opinion polls at all. Alternatively, you could conclude that public opinion moved in large numbers very quickly in the closing moments before voting. These kind of factors are possible, but not likely. The most likely result is still a 2PP around 55 or better for Labor

    I would really lie to see the Galaxy Primaries. This may cast some light on how they arrived at their 52/48 split.

  19. 119
    tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 7:56 pm | Permalink

    We are coming back!
    We are coming back!

  20. 120
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    Oh, dear! tabitha, maybe in 2020 when you’ve managed to do something about a party who’s members think it’s a jolly jape to lie.

  21. 121
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Still think that Possum’s 55.15 conclusion is pretty much on the mark, only bolstered by the appaling events in Lindsay of today. Couldn’t have happened to a more deserving bunch really.

  22. 122
    tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    “This is the sweetest victory of all.
    This is a victory for the true believers”

    - John Winston Howard, 24th November 2007

  23. 123
    alj
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Just had a look at the details of this poll;

    1- The poll is a 5 state breakdown (N.S.W, QLD, S.A,VIC and W.A) of 4 marginals for each state. The sample size is 4k, 800 per state.

    2- When adusting the swings with the respective seat weight in regards to the state wide swing, we find that the national swing is approx 5.4%, with a2pp of 52.6. This poll looks very simular to the poll in last weekend’s News Ltd papers.

    3 -The remarkable things to note is a) They show a large swing in NSW and only a 5% swing in QLD.

  24. 124
    tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    “Question: Could we have tried harder for working families?
    Answer: No we gave it our all but it wasn’t enough”
    “Question: Will Labor abandon the fight for working families ?
    Answer: Not while I am leader of this great party”

    - Kevin Rudd 24 November 2007

  25. 125
    alj
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:31 pm | Permalink

    Just a note on my last comment, N.S.W has a swing of 7.3%, the seats polled were Eden Monaro, Robbo, Wenty and Page.

    Sleep easy…….30 seats goooone!

  26. 126
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    ALJ – where did you get that info?

    I expected to hear that Galaxy was a marginal’s only poll,

    why else would News Ltd ask for a poll for tomorrow when they are publishing a Newspoll on Sturday morning?

  27. 127
    tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    “I respect the judgement of the Australian people and tonight after a good old fashioned Labor wake we recommit ourselves to keeping the Government accountable and fighting the good fight for working families”

    - Kevin Rudd November 24th 2007

  28. 128
    tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    ” Where the f&ck is Gartrell I want his ar*e he promised me I would be Prime Minister”

    - Kevin Rudd (off camera) 24th November 2007

  29. 129
    James
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:50 pm | Permalink

    For the benefit of the mathematically challenged & (those that are NOT smarter than a 5th grader).

    A 51.4% vote is likely to provide Labor with 75 Seats. So 52% would be likely to be a close win. The Govt’s advantages are already built in to the margins by now.

    Only a fool would take the one poll they like the most, ignore the other 3, and assume all is going well.

    Sure it is possible the coalition could still come back, or that all the other polls are wrong, but its damn unlikely. <5% chance.

    As for Galaxy being closest in 2004 – more chance than anything with the approx 3% margin of error that most polls have. Nielsen is credited with being the one poll that seems to overestimate the Libs vote (and has at recent elections). However that 57% seems out of step too.

    All that said, if the usual deluded suspects (you know who you are!) want to place money on the coalition to win, please do and do it soon and put a lot of money on. It will bring the odds for Labor higher and thus the rest of us will get a bigger profit!

  30. 130
    alj
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Adelaide tiser.

    Does anyone know if the acn poll was by phone or was it an online poll?

  31. 131
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:00 pm | Permalink

    ALJ,

    good work!! have you got a link?

  32. 132
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:02 pm | Permalink

    alj, that would make sense

  33. 133
    Hasta la Vista Rodente
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:04 pm | Permalink

    Tabitha, I hope you really have your hopes up. I would feel much better if I didn’t think you were just putting on a brave face. The crushing of genuine hope would be far better.

  34. 134
    BrissyRod
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Although Galaxy was very accurate last election, I think the result might be a bit closer to about 53/47.

    My revised prediction is about 81 seats to Labor.

    (sorry Cameron, I know I said 87 earlier today)

  35. 135
    BrissyRod
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Tabitha appears to have found more keys on her keyboard.

    Good for her.

  36. 136
    Samuel K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    Tabitha, you blog wh*re, you have been double posting.

  37. 137
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    ALI #121

    WHERE DID YOU GET THE GALAXY POLL INFO FROM PLEASE ???

  38. 138
    MayoFeral
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Loved the house for sale on Domain jimbob! May be vacant in a week.

    A week??? As one of the part owners I want the old bugger gone by lunchtime Sunday. If their old property isn’t ready yet then I’m sure the nearest Sally Army hostel will put him and the misses up for a few nights, after all he’s sent them lots of business over the years! ;)

  39. 139
    Baz
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Alj, that’s the Galaxy marginal poll from last week…

  40. 140
    Colin
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Both results should surely still indicate a Labor win.

    The current debate regarding the actions of the Liberal Party in Lindsay will only consolidate the poles to Labor.

    How could anyone vote for a party that allows this type of campaigning to occur?

    The differential between poles will disappear, Labour will win 86 seats.

  41. 141
    Colin
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    How saw Ruddick and Albanese on LL?
    The liberals are so corrupt

  42. 142
    Colin
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    Actually meant who saw Ruddick etal

  43. 143
    Union thug
    Posted Friday, November 23, 2007 at 12:06 am | Permalink

    Ruddock’s performance on Lateline tonight took lies and denial to the level of hilarity for the viewer. He says he was advised the Party expelled three members but doesn’t know there names because he didn’t ask. Three rednecks pull an attrotious stunt in a key marginal seat and show the true ugly face of the Liberal party two days before an election they are already certain to lose (hopefully in a big way) and he doesn’t ask. Everytime another one of them lies like this it reminds everyone of AWB, weapons of mass destruction, children overboar, non core promises etc etc. What a way to go out on what was no doubt his last appearence on a serious televised interview.

  44. 144
    Don Wigan
    Posted Friday, November 23, 2007 at 1:48 am | Permalink

    All the action is at the ACN thread -understandable. On there I noticed that someone said Galaxy was claiming the ALP primary was 42.5.

    It is conceivable it could slip below the 47-48 it has scored throughout the year, but 42.5? If it got below 45 I’d be surprised. If it gets anywhere near 42.5 I’ll eat a bucketful.

  45. 145
    Jim
    Posted Friday, November 23, 2007 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    Don, you better start eating

  46. 146
    Jai-mei
    Posted Friday, November 23, 2007 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    Tabitha’s going to looooooose
    Tabitha’s going to looooooose
    (repeat ad nauseum or until she cracks)

  47. 147
    Sharkbait
    Posted Friday, November 23, 2007 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Colin at 140
    How could anyone vote for a party that allows this type of campaigning to occur?

    Colin, there are heaps of people who will vote for this party exactly because of this type of campaining. They don’t care if it was illegal or racists or immoral. They will vote for them as long as they kick the moslems. It is no accident that this incident occured in Penrith. This is fertile ground for racism and islamophobia. The poor, the uneducated, those who have been left behind in Howard’s Australia will always look for a scape goat and the tories are providing one for them.

    By the way did the cadaever (ruddock) on LL mention use of his new anti-terror laws to prosecute this type of slander?
    i wrote to him after the cronulla riots asking if he’d prosecute alan jones. No reply.

    Labor by 24 seats.

Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All