Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Newspoll state swings

Time for a new thread. Here’s a chart showing state-level swings to Labor as recorded by Newspoll throughout the campaign. Note that the most recent result seems to indicate a mild Coalition recovery in Victoria being offset by worsening results elsewhere.

620 Comments

  1. 1
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    Bull butter.

  2. 2
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    “Note that the most recent result seems to indicate a mild Coalition recovery in Victoria being offset by worsening results elsewhere.”

    No problem there, very happy with that!

  3. 3
    Dangerous
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Is it just me, or does the 11/11/07 datapoint look the odd one out?

  4. 4
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Why, Glen?

  5. 5
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    George wouldn’t that mean it would be tough for the Laborites to pick up seats in VIC?

  6. 6
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    If you discount the 11/11 in Vic result the trend there actually looks pretty consistent.

  7. 7
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Glen says bull butter to any poll he doesn’t approve of.

  8. 8
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Socrates…from the previous thread.

    “Serenity Now, Insanity Later”

  9. 9
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says: “George wouldn’t that mean it would be tough for the Laborites to pick up seats in VIC?”

    and your point is? Do you think this is a prerequisite for winning the election?

  10. 10
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Those happy lines remind me of something from earlier in this campaign. What is it? Um. Oh yeah, that’s right THE WORM (TM)!!!!

  11. 11
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    It’s still a 7% swing to Labor in VIC – more than enough to pick up the 4 seats they want…

  12. 12
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    someone was asking on the thread which just closed about Hughes. Dana Vale won’t hang on. People there are upset with her and she has promised 1 million to upgrade a local sports oval. You know that they are in trouble when they promise pork to the constituents ;-) ……

  13. 13
    centaur_007
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Out at the prepoll today, in solid Costello territory (his office is across the road). The greens candidate is there, as is the democrats. You can pick the liberal voters from a mile, old, badly but expensively dressed. Funny enough 1 in 3 are coming from outside the electorate roughly.

  14. 14
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Oh and I think Kellygate won’t go down well in Forrest, with a large number of Muslim folk working in the meatworks in Kattaning either.

  15. 15
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    Look! Squint hard and you can see the n-a-r-r-o-w-i-n-g!

  16. 16
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    frank frederic @ 1045 in previous thread-
    ‘betting markets delsert Howard by the day
    Best offer for both parties is at BetFair: 1.24 / 5′

    Such a narrowing of the betting market has always been on as we get very close to the day. The big money will wait until the polls are incontrovertible. Perhaps it started a bit earlier this time in the overall result due to the extra consistency. The delay is especially obvious in the seat by seat betting, where events in the campaign can make a big local difference, whereas the overall market is more predictable and therefore more reflects the poll trend. That is also why the individual seats are – even now – where the value is. (except Lindsay now!) Better get on quick though.

  17. 17
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Glen, not really. Punching a 6.5% swing into the calculator they still lose 6 seats there.

  18. 18
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Frank Calabrese do you have any proof that Muslims vote for the Liberal Party anyway?

  19. 19
    nath
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    do people really beleive that the alp is going to get more than 50 2pp in qld?

  20. 20
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    centaur,

    Don’t know if you saw this, you were very quiet on PB yesterday. Peel back a number of threads to “Morgan – Liberal swing in the Perth Marginals” …. post #36. That was my answer to your astrology question of Tuesday night. Cheers :)

  21. 21
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Frank Calabrese do you have any proof that Muslims vote for the Liberal Party anyway?

    But Friends and co-workers probably do.

  22. 22
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Swings aren’t uniform NB you could get swings in Menzies, Wanon and Indi and not pick up any of our marginals. Still i think Fran Bailey is in trouble.

  23. 23
    centaur_007
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    I hear a mosque will be built where Costellos office is. Can anyone verify this?

  24. 24
    nath
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    the alp already has a majority of seats in vic, so time for the other states to do something.

  25. 25
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    I like Galaxy polls in my opinion they are the best. I remeber Kina saying that she was watching AC Neilsen as they were close to the mark in 2004 but for me its Galaxy.

  26. 26
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Hey congrats to Grover on the other thread for re-naming the Liberal campaign:

    “Sham-paign”

    (Although the alternative spelling is also allowed: “Sham-pain”!)

    So raise your flutes, and toast Dennis’s winning effort to get the Rodent re-elected!

    hmmm, this Sham-paign is as sweet as victory!

  27. 27
    Pi
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    # 5 Glen Says: November 22nd, 2007 at 2:26 pm

    George wouldn’t that mean it would be tough for the Laborites to pick up seats in VIC?

    It would if the swing was uniform Glen… but that isn’t going to happen.

    Higgins is going down.

  28. 28
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Well lets wait and c 4 2nites Galaxy poll b4 we get 2 xcited about a meltdown.

  29. 29
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Centaur, I will be handing out how-to-vote cards in Higgins on Saturday. Will be doing what I can to produce a healthy swing away from Costello.

  30. 30
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    I know Glen, but you’d have your head in the sand to think that with the kind of swing shown they wouldn’t lose at least 4.

  31. 31
    Pi
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    LOL… I can see why you libs supporters are all climate-change deniers.

  32. 32
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    JoM, the Galaxy was the closest on 2PP. ACN was pretty accurate on primaries but overestimate Coalition primary support.

    I’d say both are worth a look in. ACN for Labor primary, Galaxy for 2PP.

  33. 33
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    28,

    “Well lets wait and c 4 2nites Galaxy poll b4 we get 2 xcited about a meltdown.”

    I have news for you. The meltdown is already in progress :) :) [i.e PAST tense ;-) ]

  34. 34
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    centaur_007 Says: “I hear a mosque will be built where Costellos office is. Can anyone verify this?”

    That’s what it says on the pamphlet I have here – next to it will be a heroine shooting gallery, then a union bosses lounge, and just a little further than that a fairy shop.

  35. 35
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Noocat you should be in LaTrobe or Deakin where your help could cause an upset, Higgins will not fall.

    At least im at a Liberal booth in Mt Waverly i wont get spat on like i would should i be at a booth in the western suburbs lol!

  36. 36
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    “do people really beleive that the alp is going to get more than 50 2pp in qld?”

    Yep – Beattie got 54.5% at the last state election so why not?

  37. 37
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    I cannot wait to ask some questions of the liberal volunteers on Saturday.

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Is this a real one or is it faked?”

  38. 38
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    If Howard and Costello both lose we can declare the current Liberal Party dead.

    A new one will have to be reinvented.

  39. 39
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Edward StJohn Says: “Well lets wait and c 4 2nites Galaxy poll b4 we get 2 xcited about a meltdown.”

    so we’re finally letting go of any change of narrowing are we?

  40. 40
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    only if it was uniform NB and that is unlikely, election night will be full of surprises :(

  41. 41
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Glen is one of those people who believes that if you say something is so, it is so.

  42. 42
    nath
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    how many times have they got more than 50% 2pp in queensland, once I think since ww2. it will still swing big, but i doubt they’d get more than 50%. I hope im wrong!

  43. 43
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    2GB and 2UE talkbacks both spinning the race-hategate and NPC appearance furiously. Anyone pro-Lib allowed to ramble on whilst anyone anti gets short shrift.

    Heavy criticism of the ALP’s Voting Card mailout as a “dirty trick”.

  44. 44
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    BV they are real if they are authorised simple answer to ur question.

  45. 45
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    It’s alright Glen I am in La Trobe and will be working to get rid of Jason Wood………consider it my civic duty.

  46. 46
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Is this one authorised or one of the ‘other’ Liberal publications?”

  47. 47
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Geepee…so?

  48. 48
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Re Galaxy at the last election

    Yeah, they were the closest last election on 2pp but only because in the lottery of where a poll falls within the MOE they happened to land closest to the actual result. They’ve been dining out on it ever since but the fact that they did so is of absolutely no significance. All the other polls bar Newspoll with their dodgy formula got the 2pp within their MOE.

  49. 49
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    What Galaxy result would make the Liberal Party hopeful? 52/48 or below? Or will you be happy with 53/47?

    I have a feeling we’ll probably get a 53/47… but I won’t be surprised with one point either way. No chance of a 55/45.

    I’m with Glen on one point, I think people will be surprised on the night just how close it is.

  50. 50
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Watched bits and pieces of the PM’s Press Club address (I’ll watch the whole thing later). There’s no one in politcs better at fielding questions from pestilent hacks than the PM. At one point one smug little specimen noted the presence of Mr Howard’s grandson at the Liberal launch and then wondered whether he worried about future generations and the effect climate change would have on Angus’ generation. The PM responded by saying that Angus spoke to him often about greenhouse gases.

    Brought the house down. The grub who’d asked the question – Ben Packham – flopped into his chair and looked very sulky.

  51. 51
    Lord D
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Swings in Vic and NSW are underestimated by Newspoll, as they always give 61% of minor prefs to Labor. With Greens on 8% in NSW and 9% in Vic, add a point to Labor’s 2PP in those states. However, in Qld, where Greens only have 3%, subtract a point.

  52. 52
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    Well i am in Chisholm damn that Anna Burke! Bring back Michael Wooldridge!

  53. 53
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/calculator/?swing=state&national=0&nsw=7&vic=7&qld=11&wa=5.5&sa=9&tas=5&act=5&nt=5&retiringfactor=1

  54. 54
    Peachy
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    to Liberal staffer on HTV card –

    “is this a core or non-core HTV card?”

  55. 55
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:37 pm | Permalink

    LTEP AC Neilsen primary

    Coalition = 43%

    Labor = 47%

    I’m hoping the ALP primary vote is biggest in safe Labor, Liberal seats

  56. 56
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Caroline It Is OVERington has a new blog up.

    I haven’t read but I get the gist from the headline and thought I show her my support – below

    Little value in a Priceless election
    http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/coverington/index.php/theaustralian/comments/Little_value_in_a_Priceless_election/

    “I totally agree with you Caroline. What was really needed was more dirt, sleaze, titillation and mindless fluff. And you provided just that.

    I nominate you as the outstanding troll of the campaign, sweetie. You indeed made my day every time you post. Love your work. Keep it up and don’t let those naysayers put you off your important contributions to the national debate.

    I have to make one final qualification however and that is the immense passion evoked over the “phamphletgate affair” which is vying for top spot against your “shag for story gate”.

  57. 57
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    LTEP a 52-48 poll and anything could happen but anything at 55-45 and well that’s gonna be tough.

  58. 58
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Mr Speaker……hahahahahahahahaha

  59. 59
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    I’m hoping the ALP primary vote is biggest in safe Labor, Liberal seats

    Fat chance of that mate.

  60. 60
    nath
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    glen, i thought you said you were in melb poorts?

  61. 61
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Is the ‘Liberal Party’ listed on this card a real organisation or a made-up one like the ‘Islamic Australia Federation’?”"

  62. 62
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye @ 50, yes there will be a new question in the next poll asking:

    “Who do you think is better managed at fielding questions from pestilent hacks?”

    John Howard will get 55% of the vote and go on to win the election! (snort, snort, snoooooort)

  63. 63
    centaur_007
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Glen I haven’t seen anyone getting spat on before, but I did see an Asian man go ape at the liberals this morning. We had to calm him down, it was quite a sight.
    Got to go back for more sultanas…back to booth.
    See you all 2nite.
    George I really enjoyed our lunch and I’m looking forward to our celebratory drink/dinner/banquet after

  64. 64
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    “Noocat you should be in LaTrobe or Deakin where your help could cause an upset, Higgins will not fall.”

    Well, someone has to be there. We can’t let Costello have a free run.

  65. 65
    JFC
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    I can’t see what all the fuss is about.

    It was obviously a non-core pamphlet.

  66. 66
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    I am a resident of Melbourne Ports but i am assisting at a booth in Chisholm handing out HTV cards.

  67. 67
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Does this how to vote card have any ‘pranks’ about Bali Bombers on it?”

  68. 68
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    centaur_007 @ 63 – can’t wait :-)

  69. 69
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    I was listening to ABC radio earlier and they took a crew out to Lindsay to monitor reaction on the street. It was overwhelmingly negative, with a couple of lib voters saying they’d reconsider their vote. One guy said that people out west were tired of being taken for fools…

    I personally think that the affair (coupled with all the other lib stuff ups) is good news for Labor in those small L Liberal seats they’re after – wentworth, northsydney etc – the more politically attuned seats where questions of ethics might get a bigger run. It could make for some unexpected results on Sat night.

  70. 70
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    35 Glen. So Anna Burke should wipe your candidate. :)

  71. 71
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Der Krieg ist fast verloren Kollegen, aber es gibt immer noch Hoffnung, dass wir ziehen Sie es aus.

  72. 72
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    I wonder how many volunteers ring the LNP and cancel out of handing out HTV cards…………I certainly would.

  73. 73
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Well not at our booth its a Tory stronghold in the seat :)

  74. 74
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Glen, I think Chisholm will be a safe Labor seat after Saturday LOL

  75. 75
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Here is Antony’s authorised version for this poll breakdown:

    http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/calculator/?swing=state&national=0&nsw=7.9&vic=7&qld=11.1&wa=5.4&sa=9.4&tas=5&act=5&nt=5&retiringfactor=1.5

    100 seats to Labor.

  76. 76
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Anna Burke is a wonderful candidate. Does a great job in the electorate.

  77. 77
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    maybe fairly safe LOL

  78. 78
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Are the ‘tax cuts’ you mention in your flyers really planned or are they like the St Mary’s Mosque?””

  79. 79
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Well not at our booth its a Tory stronghold in the seat :)

    Same with the booth I’ll be working at (Highbury South, in Sturt).

    But I just figure that means there’s more voters to switch. :-P

  80. 80
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says:”Der Krieg ist fast verloren Kollegen, aber es gibt immer noch Hoffnung, dass wir ziehen Sie es aus.”

    Not a chance Glen – it’s lost and you know it.

  81. 81
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    JHIC

    I haven’t read the overington article but I’ve already composed my response:

    ‘You’re an idiot!”

  82. 82
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been working for Anna for the last 3 weeks.

  83. 83
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    And I can guarantee Berowra will still be a safe Liberal seat after Saturday, with a trimmed margin.

  84. 84
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    BV, keepem coming :-)

  85. 85
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    Also Glen

    Du sagst es so ist, natuerlich is es so.

    Wir koennen zusammen Deutsch sprechen, und die andere koennen uns nicht verstehen.

    But we should speak English …

  86. 86
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    George nicht unbedingt wir gewinnen können, wird es hart, und es wird eng, aber Sie wissen nie, Wenk Mai zur Rettung kommen, nachdem alle.

  87. 87
    Observer
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    meltdown – i want a BLEV

  88. 88
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been working for Anna for the last 3 weeks.

    Good work!

  89. 89
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Was the reaction of the candidate for [seat x] to ‘laugh’ when they first saw the Kelly Gang’s flyer? Because that was apparently the reaction she received when she showed it around.”

  90. 90
    constant lurker
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:46 pm | Permalink

    I did a bit of letterboxing over the weekend. The woman at the ALP campaign HQ in Deakin said that people had been coming in asking if they could help – never helped the ALP before but Kevin Andrews just made them feel they had to do something. Will this latest situation drive more this way?

  91. 91
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Andrew Robb Press Release:

    “I find it offensive that the senior Liberals have been smeared in this way. If we had done this, you can bet your bottom dollar that it would have been produced on proper printing stock with properly produced photos and logos and the written copy would have been clever and cunning.

    To associate the Liberal HQ in any way or fashion to this amateur attempt is offensive in the extreme and any and all of you (you know who you are) should apologise and not just say sorry.”

  92. 92
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Gewinnen? Unmoeglich!

  93. 93
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    I wish I’d learnt German at school!
    Glen, nice trick LOL

  94. 94
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, I finished my fourth pre polling stint today.

  95. 95
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Glen, Volkswagen Messerschmidt, Junkers and Panzer to you.

  96. 96
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says: “George nicht unbedingt wir gewinnen können, wird es hart, und es wird eng, aber Sie wissen nie, Wenk Mai zur Rettung kommen, nachdem alle.”

    You’ve lost me, somthing about winning is hard? But it’s close? …You’re close to being hard?

  97. 97
    James
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    @Chris B (97)

    Hows the pre-polling sound? been getting any wind of what people are thinking?

  98. 98
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Don’t worry the only things ill be saying on election night may be in German should we lose, i am sure you’ll find this amusing enough.

    Zumindest haben wir den Bürgermeister von Brisbane, wenn wir verlieren.

  99. 99
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Chris B? Are you getting any idea of how things are going?

  100. 100
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Oh I forgot Porsche.

  101. 101
    Observer
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Yeh – people get spat on – at the Liberal booths.

  102. 102
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    Das ist richtig George.

  103. 103
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    We’re all going to learn Madarin if Rudd wins.

  104. 104
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Very busy, it’s hard to judge at pre polls. Although have had good comments.

  105. 105
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Chairman Rudd

  106. 106
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    It’s gotta be better than putting up with General Wenck’s infernal ramblings in Deutsch…

  107. 107
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Yeah steven Kaye

    Only a smug little specimen grub Journo would ask a question to the PM about the future of the planet. His response, as you breathlessly report, (as always) was a Joke. But it brought the house down…well done rodent! Keep churning out all that crap. We’re not going to die tomorrow are we Steven. Got any children?

  108. 108
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Sean are you part of a working family?

  109. 109
    mr awesome
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    oi let’s keep it like a poker table, English only. It’s great that some of you speak other languages but how are us lurkers supposed to follow?

  110. 110
    Tess from Leonay
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Fisher and Ryan falling?

    Now that I’d like to see…

  111. 111
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Eisene Kanzler Rudd

  112. 112
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Democrats MySpace page pulled
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/22/2098036.htm

    HAHAHAHAHAAHH

  113. 113
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    107 Sean The audience was full of Liberal supporters. Didn’t you notice the way they tried to intimidate reporters when asking about Lindsay?

  114. 114
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    John of M – If the Libs win, I’m going to buy AC Neilsen or Newspoll – they’ll be going cheap!

  115. 115
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Ok you guys my shock of the election will be Forde to the National Party.

  116. 116
    blindoptimist
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Glen sagt “Der Krieg ist fast verloren” …. Bestimmt! But it’s not warfare: happily it is an election.

  117. 117
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    I’ll stop speaking German if Glen does

  118. 118
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Alex good point.

  119. 119
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Sean are you part of a working family?

    I’m part of TWO working families.

    Also, as of today:

    I weigh 80 KG. On day 1 of the campaign I weighed 86.

    My goal by election day was 79, but 80 is pretty good.

  120. 120
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Glen wo sind der Rathaus?

  121. 121
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Natürlich

  122. 122
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn

    Go for 100+ on polling day

  123. 123
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    “George nicht unbedingt wir gewinnen können, wird es hart, und es wird eng, aber Sie wissen nie, Wenk Mai zur Rettung kommen, nachdem alle.”

    Not necessarily, we can win, it will be hard and tight but you never know, General Wank may come to the rescue after all.

    This is a translation from atrocious German. If Glen were a dog, he would be a german mongrel.

  124. 124
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    putting on 20 kgs in 2 days would not be healthy.

  125. 125
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    John Hunt…google translate can only do so much lol!

  126. 126
    gusface
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    for those interested?

    and the letter is weirder than the lindsay crap

    http://voiceoftheshire.blogspot.com/

  127. 127
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    113 Chris B – Did you see the furious glare on Michelle Grattan’s face directed at rent-a-lib when they heckled her for asking another question about the Lindsay fiasco?

  128. 128
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    So has Kevin07 got up off the floor ans stopped laughing yet?

  129. 129
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Google is a german mongrel dog

  130. 130
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    113 Chris B - Did you see the furious glare on Michelle Grattan’s face directed at rent-a-lib when they heckled her for asking another question about the Lindsay fiasco?

    Having all those Libs cheering did more harm than good.

  131. 131
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    The journalists couldn’t help themselves im glad she and others got a kick in the pants for not sticking to the issues.

  132. 132
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    When it rains it pours…

    The Commonwealth Bank has announced that they will be increasing home loan interest rates AGAIN. They have already increased them in response to last weeks rate rise, so this will be on top of that! No mention of how much the rise will be though. How many nails are in Johnny’s coffin now?

  133. 133
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Issue du Jour Glen – PamphletHateMuslimsGate

  134. 134
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Are you saying the Lib muckraking in Lindsay is not an issue?

  135. 135
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    If you think what the tories did in Lindsay was bad that was nothing compared to this.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUKL1391837120070913
    Muslims irked by Italian senator’s “pig” comments

    “A far-right Italian senator outraged Muslims on Thursday by calling for a “Pig Day” protest against the planned construction of a mosque in northern Italy.”

  136. 136
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Can I just say this – the GG is for turning!!!

    Have you all noticed the not so subtle shift in the last few days?

  137. 137
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Stop shooting the Messenger.

    Howard is dead, kaput, finished.

    and how ironic that the candidate for Lindsay was a former Police Officer, and Kelly was in the airforce.

    Great morals there.

  138. 138
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Sean are you part of a working family?

    Funnily enough ESJ I am and I really can’t get enough of the phrase. Rudd I think is underutilising it. What with both parents being absorbed into the workforce with no attendant compensation, child care that costs a fortune, the fact that user pays is the predominant Howard ethos and AWA’s are set to force our noses to the grindstone even more I think its an accurate description of the modern family – maybe not in vaucluse though.

  139. 139
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Not an important one no, managing the economy, IR, climate change, national security they are more important Geepee.

  140. 140
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 135, why are you talking about Italian politics?

  141. 141
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it funny that in what is likely to be John Howard’s last parliamentary speech, he was defending the government against a dirty tricks campaign, yet it turned out to be completely true.

  142. 142
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    gusface: The letter sounds like something straight out of the EB.

  143. 143
    Dasho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    BV Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 2:35 pm

    -”Vote Liberal. Here, have a how to vote card.”

    -”Is this one authorised or one of the ‘other’ Liberal publications?”

    I’ll be greeting them with “Ala akbar!”

  144. 144
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Not an important one no, managing the economy,

    The Australian doesn’t manage the economy. There are no levers left Glen, Hawke and Keating got rid of them because they were holding us back.

  145. 145
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    1 managing the economy – f*cked up skills, inflation, interest rates
    2 IR – not sure why you would bring this up, but hey, it’s your funeral
    3 climate change – again, your point?
    4 national security – Australia is the Control of Maxwell Smart fame

    “they are more important Geepee.”

    Agree with you

  146. 146
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    130 ShowsOn Yes I did, and I also wondered whether some reporters were intimidated.

  147. 147
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Glen – after consuming a huge amount of celebratory grog on Saturday night, I’ll probably be speaking Russian and blogging in syrillics!

  148. 148
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    George – it is an easier thing to do than trying to defend the indefensible

  149. 149
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    130 ShowsOn Yes I did, and I also wondered whether some reporters were intimidated.

    The reporters have a good way of coming back in the articles they write over the next 2 days.

  150. 150
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 131 – [The journalists couldn’t help themselves im glad she and others got a kick in the pants for not sticking to the issues.]

    They weren’t journalists Glen – who among them would dare heckle the matriarch of political commentators and risk that look? Not even GS or GM.

  151. 151
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    Wouldn’t be funny if the reporters when they get back to work go “you know what? f#@k em” and type what they really think of the LNP.

  152. 152
    slartybardfast
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Well Grattan wasn’t intimidated thats for sure, if fact Old man J up at the dias was shitting himself cos he could see she wasn’t impressed, if he could I think Ol J would have told them to shut up.

  153. 153
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Between Rob’s google research skillz and the Kelly Gang’s alleged desktop publishing operation, the Liberals seem to support Rudd’s support for laptops and technology in deed if not word.

  154. 154
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    A comment on the radio by a Lindsay voter. We have always voted Liberal, I don’t know what we are going to do now. We have two days to make up our minds. The person sounded very down.

  155. 155
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Sledging an icon like Gratten by a bunch of immature Liberal plants is very poor form. I suspect the coverage will be wall to wall shite for the Libs.

  156. 156
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    I was referring how the journalists couldnt help themselves asking 90% of their questions about Lindsay, im glad Grattan got booed for brining Lindsay up for the 8th time enoughs enough.

  157. 157
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Chris B

    I admired the fact that most reporters ignored the Howard hoons up the back and asked their questions regardless (did anyone notice that deranged tory David Barnett in the crowd..)
    They obviously had trouble selling tickets to the press so the gates were opened to the lib riff raff. Steven Kaye was probably there..

  158. 158
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    I was referring how the journalists couldnt help themselves asking 90% of their questions about Lindsay, im glad Grattan got booed for brining Lindsay up for the 8th time enoughs enough.

    Oh FFS Glen, we have a FREE PRESS they can ask whatever they want.

  159. 159
    frank frederic
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    hahahahh Sean @ 81
    no hard feeling mate, in her article “Little_value_in_a_Priceless_election”, Overington talking about missing Matt Price (hence “priceless”) comments/analysis in this election. More or less a “tribute” to Mr. Price

  160. 160
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    asking 90% of their questions about Lindsay

    You’re right Glen. They should have done their jobs properly and just asked about Union Bosses just like Rupert’s instructions. Silly of those journos.

  161. 161
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:12 pm | Permalink

    Glen she’s just doing her job. This Lindsay story is likely to sell more papers than a discussion of the Libs campaign lines, which noone is interested in.

  162. 162
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    No Paul is it too much to ask for journos to ask about policy?

  163. 163
    gusface
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    will

    suspect we will hear more about this one
    http://voiceoftheshire.blogspot.com/
    - EB is definitely in the frame
    what do you think brother glen and elect vessel esj ????

  164. 164
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Frank

    She’s still an idiot.

  165. 165
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    LTEP 7 other people asked the same questions she didn’t need to ask another for crying out loud…

  166. 166
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    First comment is nothing has changed in any polls re the result – a landslide

    Second comment re ALLEGED improvement for Labor in NSW and ALLEGED decrease for Labor in Vic is SIMPLY UNTRUE

    The previous Newspoll had an UNTRUE few $ lead to Labour in NSW and
    an UNTRUE 19% lead in Vic

    This poll has merely CORRECTED Newspoll’s wrong earlier state breakup poll

    Frankly , the idea of doing a National Poll is correct BUT the subsequent breakup of that National poll into state by state is flawed as the state samples are too small

    Irrespective of the above , to use a ‘Ruddism’ …am I happy ?……..ABSOLUTELY
    …why ?…..because the correct polling (the National polls) are consistent for Rudd
    by a large 2PP margin

  167. 167
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    No Paul is it too much to ask for journos to ask about policy?

    They can ask about WHATEVER THEY WANT TO ASK!

    Your attitude to the media, and your admiration for Ian Smith suggests you have some sort of deep hatred for democracy.

  168. 168
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn Says:”Oh FFS Glen, we have a FREE PRESS they can ask whatever they want.”

    I think there’s something more to Glen breaking out into German. Meanwhile at the Press Club:

    M. Grattan: “Prime minister, on the leaflet that was…”

    Glen [Interrupting]: “Grattan! We don not vask unt Fuhrer difficult questions… NEXT!”

  169. 169
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    Maybe Grattan should have asked JHO if Jackies husband was OK and if he needed counseling after those nasty union bullies stuffed a pamphlet in his and and took photos?

  170. 170
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    LTEP 7 other people asked the same questions she didn’t need to ask another for crying out loud…

    Are you saying that “Mr Speaker” should’ve ruled them out of order!?

  171. 171
    Derek Corbett
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    jaundiced view @ 127

    I noticed that. It was an almost hostile reaction to Michelle having the cheek to ask the question. A strange moment in the whole affair. It was the clapping that got me, too. Last hurrah. The final rally of the troops. Howard’s finale.

    Someone earlier on this thread – Stephen Kayke – referred to the question on climate change from a journo grub. Howard responded with basic orifice stuff, which is about the level of a Liberal joke. Howard is certainly a climate-change septic, but knows all about farts …

  172. 172
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Glen you personally asked about earwax about 10 times on this very blog. Since the topic at hand today is illegal behaviour by a member of the NSW Liberal Party Executive I think the journos can ask 8 different questions, even if they are similar.

  173. 173
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Whew! Now I finally get it. What’s transpired in Lindsay is no big deal, thanks to Skynews’ downgrade of the scandal to merely “questions”. Hope it makes Mr. Howard feel better he hasn’t been deserted by his cheerleading squad on Skynews:

    Pamphlet questions
    Pamphlet questions
    Updated: 15:21, Thursday November 22, 2007

    There are reports that the husband of Karen Chijoff, the Liberal candidate for Lindsay, was involved in the distribution of a fake election pamphlet aimed at inciting anti-Muslim sentiment.

  174. 174
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    165 Glen Yeah, that was great wasn’t it.

  175. 175
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Yes Glen if it had been Labor caught with dishonest phamphlets I’m sure you wouldn’t expect the jounos to ask Rudd many questions.

  176. 176
    noel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    loving glen’s posts in german. I feel like the Allies toward the end of WW2, worrying about the Germans wheeling out a secret weapon and grabbing a last-minute victory. Thankfully all Lib weapons so far have either fizzed or blown up in their faces.

  177. 177
    Gippslander
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    34
    George Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 2:32 pm

    That’s what it says on the pamphlet I have here – next to it will be a heroine shooting gallery, then a union bosses lounge, and just a little further than that a fairy shop.

    Hey George.. would thar heroine be Jackie Kelly?

  178. 178
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Sure ask 1 or 2 but don’t waste half an hour on that anyway id rather they scrutinise Rudd’s dodgy policies.

  179. 179
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    It’s a press club lunch. Press = news. News = Lindsay. The Libs have been talking about policy all thru the campaign.

    Makes Kelly & co’s shenanigans all the more reprehensible (from the Tory standpoint).

    Nicht wahr, Greg?

  180. 180
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    he he, Gippslander @ 177, I mean heroin of course, but that works for me!

  181. 181
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Maybe if Howard would confess his crimes the journos wouldn’t need to keep asking.

  182. 182
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    165 Glen Yeah, that was great wasn’t it.

    Yeah it was my favourite part. It will be in my highlights package. :-P

  183. 183
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    And that is why you guys are getting a bollocking.

    Just because you have had enough does not mean the story is over. New details emerged as the conference proceeded. Do you think Howard knew that Clijoff’s husband was involved? Of course he did, but made no reference beforehand. By not revealing all up front the story will eke out over the coming hours and days and be far far worse for the Libs overall.

    The possibility that the spouses of Kelly and Clijoff could end up in jail is a big story. The fact that the Liberal Director says he has done nothing that wasn’t authorised means there are many aspects of this story to be explored.

    It is a nice juicy scandal at the worst possible moment for the Libs as individuals and as a party.

  184. 184
    imacca
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen, the dirty tricks in Lindsay are after all the issue of the day, and it was made the issue by the Liberal Party. For Kelly’s husband to be involved when she is known to be close to the PM is a very, very poor look. Then Rattus’s idiot mate Jackie defends it as a prank??

    And a new take on an old song for the kiddies out there (just for you Glen mate!!).

    the wheels on the bus fall off off off, off off off, off off off,
    the wheels on the bus fall off off off,
    all around the town.

    the engine of the bus goes boom clank hiss, goes boom clank hiss,goes boom clank hiss,
    the engine of the bus goes boom clank hiss,
    all around the town.

    the Rat driving the bus goes WTF,WTF,WTF,
    the Rat driving the bus goes WTF,
    before election day.

    Bye bye Rattus!

  185. 185
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:20 pm | Permalink

    Glen your lust for Julie Bishop is sickening

  186. 186
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    98
    Glen Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 2:49 pm
    Zumindest haben wir den Bürgermeister von Brisbane, wenn wir verlieren.

    You do know that Newmann is a Liberal Mayor of a Council with a Labor majority? Brisbane City may have a budget larger than Tasmania’s but still, the BAC is not a big enough rat hole to accomodate every unemployed Liberal staffer in Australia, (even if Newman didn’t have to ask permission from his other Councillors). Unlike the other bunker escape, there is no Argentina this time.

  187. 187
    Alex McDonnel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    The Kelly Gang’s effort will be all over the 6.00 pm news today and in all the papers tomorrow. Howard needed that like rabies – he will be kicking a few arses later today. But as someone said earlier here, dirty tricks and lies are part of Howard’s ‘liberal’ ethos, so we shouldn’t be surprised when this type of desperate stunt is perped by his supporters.

  188. 188
    Grooski
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Guys, confirming that ALL polling companies are releasing their final analysis overnight. That is Galaxy, Newspoll, Morgan and AC Nielsen.

    Anthony Green will be giving special comments on ABC Brisbane radio tomorrow morning with Madonna at around 8.30 covering 3 of those companies the big three’s results (ex Morgan – poor bastards – here’s hoping they get close on the result this year)

    Galaxy and ACN have done big polls apparently, and also single seat polling. There will also be releases from Westpoll and EMRS on several state polls.

    That should satiate any poll hungry people I think.

  189. 189
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Grattan/Oakes/Bongornio are experienced operators – who actually have a brain. They’ve seen it all in 30 to 40 years in Canberra. The Kelly story would have offended them. They see politics as a tough game – but they also know what is acceptable in politics and what is not. Oakes on “Today” will be the same Oakes on the 6pm news – probably the second story, after Bernie Banton. It will be very very pointed.

  190. 190
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    There is nothing wrong with Julie Bishop.

    She’s at least got more brains than Gillard, sure she goes to schools when not invited but she gets there on time.

    Julie could be the Thatcher we need should we lose and for the middle aged she aint half bad to look at ;) enjoy John Hunt lol!

  191. 191
    Grooski
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy results are apparently showing the election as “too close to call”

  192. 192
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Stiflers Mum for PM (the Libs Adelaide candidate)

  193. 193
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:23 pm | Permalink

    Grooski can you post the site where you got that from please

  194. 194
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Socrates

    I agree with you it will be a disaster if we lose. But that’s politics for you.

    Remember, ‘Serenity Now, Insanity Later’

  195. 195
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen you conveniently changed the subject

  196. 196
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    “Julie could be the Thatcher we need should we lose …” Oh FFS!

  197. 197
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    188 Grooski The full effect of the Lindsay issue may not show up in these polls.

  198. 198
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    so 52/48 for Galaxy?

  199. 199
    Rob
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen sagte

    Zumindest haben wir den Bürgermeister von Brisbane, wenn wir verlieren.

    Ja, aber er ist nur im Tunnel!

  200. 200
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy to show 50/50

  201. 201
    Grooski
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    No site John – spoke to ABC radio people this morning.

  202. 202
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    :)

  203. 203
    imacca
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    As an ALP supporter i really really hope that Julie Bishop is the next leader of the Libs.

  204. 204
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    190 Glen I thought Howard was a Thatcher.

  205. 205
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Bishop may have a chance because she isn’t a muslim. Nah she has no hope with the Libs she’s a woman.

  206. 206
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Maybe Kerry Obrien will get mesmorised by those eyes.

  207. 207
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    So many German speakers. It’s like Monty Pythons Fliegende Zirkus.

  208. 208
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Chris B Howie is a man though lol.

  209. 209
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    208 Glen Isn’t Thatcher?

  210. 210
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    204 Yes that is why Cossie is all luvvy duvvy with him/her

  211. 211
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen,
    you are getting as boring and desperate as Howard.
    Whining about how the journos don’t ask about policy – boo-hoo – poor widdle boi!
    I didn’t hear you making those complaints when journos were going after Rudd because of his wife’s business. I didn’t hear you complainging when Julia Gillard’s ANCIENT and irrelevant membership of the socialist forum became news – or are you suggesting that those are policy issues.
    I take no issue with your political allegiances – I take issue with the fact that you are a boring, repetitive, whiny hypocrite who knows bugger all about politics, history or public policy. You, Glen are a mindless barracker.

  212. 212
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Cool Grooski. When and where will the poll be released?

  213. 213
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Loved that comment by Howard that just because Kelly and the new candidates partners were implicated in this mess that in or enlightened society there is now way a woman should be held responsible for their partners sins.

    WTF remember Kevin”s wife under attack and having to sell her Australian arm of her business.

    Then their was the attacks on Gillard’s ex partner for allegedly dodgy dealings.

  214. 214
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    Howard = Thatcher……..umm hasn’t she got dementia too?

  215. 215
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    But Star did the media ask Rudd in questions at the Press Club all of those gaffes and ’smear issues’ no!

    Julie for PM

  216. 216
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    http://aycu39.webshots.com/image/36438/2004995965204485611_rs.jpg

  217. 217
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    But Star did the media ask Rudd in questions at the Press Club all of those gaffes and ’smear issues’ no!

    Julie for PM

    Rudd’s campaign hasn’t used racial and religious hatred to try to win votes.

  218. 218
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    “Julie for PM” – yeah, not for a while boss.

  219. 219
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy reporting 50-50? So LNP have made up 4 points in as many days?

  220. 220
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Glen,
    are you familiar with something called the news cycle?

  221. 221
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Glen, the bigoted message in the leaflet handed out by the Libs is not a “gaffe” or “smear”. It is shear racism and dog whistling to the red-necks.

  222. 222
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    Ja

  223. 223
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    Star. Although I hate to admit it I think Howard’s response to the question was correct. We still have a presumption of innocence, and two wrongs don’t make a right either. However, the feds should be going through their houses right now to get t the bottom of the matter.

  224. 224
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Y’all we should be listening to Grooski!

  225. 225
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Toby 219 Glaxy 50/50 was my prediction
    Galaxy is sligthly biased in their method…

  226. 226
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    BV Thats great!

  227. 227
    Wally
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Shame the polls released today/tomorrow won’t reflect today’s Kelly gang calamity

  228. 228
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Will this be investigated as thoroughly by the Feds like the outstanding investigation into the EB from 2004?

  229. 229
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy = General Wenck or Stiener

  230. 230
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    John of Melbourne,
    I’d like to listen to Grooski, but it’s difficult when people keep asking him questions on a possible Galaxy Poll, and there’s no answer. We don’t have a clue, mate.

  231. 231
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    225 JHIAC – Ah OK, cool. On 2PP’s I think:

    Newspoll – 54-46
    Morgan – 54-46
    Galaxy – 52-48

  232. 232
    charles
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Whoever the Liberal that tipped off the Labor campaign, I commend them.

    Well that is three right wing nutters kicked out of the Liberal party, at this rate there is hope yet.

  233. 233
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    John Hunt — these results haven’t been released yet have they? Is there really a report saying Galaxy is too close to call?

    You’re kidding right???!

  234. 234
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Nb

    As Howard would put it ”Too wongs do not make a white. “

  235. 235
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Bushfire Bill,

    How are you going with giving up the smokes? :) :) …… will assume alright and wish you good luck, keep it up :)

  236. 236
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    NB 223
    If Haneef had written, authorised and distributed those pamphlets, he would be in an unknown location right now under heavy AFP interrogation…

  237. 237
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    The final Galaxy won’t be biased. However, I’m not sure whether ‘too close to call’ is based on their seat polling or their national polling.

  238. 238
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    225 JHIAC
    Aaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh!!!
    I thought that 50-50 was a real poll. I think I just lost the last of my hair…

  239. 239
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    John Hunt is a Coward,
    Would you be so kind as to tell us if you have any other basis for your prediction other than your feelings that Galaxy are “biased in their method”. If you don’t, I don’t understand why you are predicting.

  240. 240
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    234 Star

    Hahahahahahahahahaha

  241. 241
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Ashley – false alarm
    it is only my short and jocular prediction

  242. 242
    tdt
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Bitte sprechen Deutsch nicht. Glen, du bist ein twit.

  243. 243
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy results are apparently showing the election as “too close to call”

    Who said this and where?

  244. 244
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Ernest look at the overall trends and where they have been all year
    Morgan is Labor Bias
    Galaxy is Liberal Bias
    Newspoll ok
    ACN best

  245. 245
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    CH7 news tonight “race hate pamphlets”………noooooooooooo

  246. 246
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, Im an ACN man too, JHIAC.

  247. 247
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    A poll about if the leaflet would change people’s votes. http://www.news.com.au/poll/1,,26697-5031825,00.html

  248. 248
    gusface
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    who is ernest?

  249. 249
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    236 JHIAC

    You are right of course, but the reason I’m so happy to anticipate Howard’s demise is that I want to see a return to a more decent society. Not the sick social puppy we have now.

  250. 250
    charles
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 2:53 pm

    Democrats MySpace page pulled
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/22/2098036.htm

    HAHAHAHAHAAHH

    Clearly you don’t understand a fair go for all.

  251. 251
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    John Hunt — no more short and jocular conversations around here thanks!

    Grooski — is your comment about too close to call based on something you heard on the radio or your own opinion? You are yanking my chain aren’t you?

  252. 252
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    gusface 248 Hemingway

  253. 253
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    I do i just think its funny that the Greens probably did this.

  254. 254
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    247 Will – Obviosuly the Young Libs were too busy watching Howard’s speech to sit at their computers and vote 1000 times for the Coaltion like usual.

  255. 255
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    248 gusface I don’t know but I feel their is an Importance of being Ernest. Couldn’t help myself.

  256. 256
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    #250
    Libs dont like democracy…..eg “race hate pamphlets……..heckling journalists….etc etc”

  257. 257
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Re :John Hunt Is A Coward @236

    If Haneef had written, authorised and distributed those pamphlets, he would be in an unknown location right now under heavy AFP interrogation…

    Too extrapolate further – Would the Lindsay candidate and Kelly if they were on temp visas be deported by K Andrews as Minister because of their association with family members facing criminal charges?

  258. 258
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    the Hun is up to it’s old tricks, trying to spin the Lindsay pamphlet debacle as boozed up lark…

    “NSW MP Jackie Kelly’s husband Gary Clark whipped up a dodgy campaign leaflet after a few beers. What’s the worst idea you’ve come up with after a skinful?”

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,22802776-662,00.html

  259. 259
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    THE UNION BOSSES DID IT! THEY ARE COMING BACK!!!

  260. 260
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    Heres some more AWA stuff to talk about

    http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,23636,22802626-462,00.html

  261. 261
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Re 227,

    Wally Says:

    November 22nd, 2007 at 3:33 pm
    Shame the polls released today/tomorrow won’t reflect today’s Kelly gang calamity

    No, but the ones released Saturday night WILL reflect it :)

  262. 262
    brad
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    any idea what time polls will be released tonight, and where they will be first released?

  263. 263
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Star @ 234

    That was Arthur Calwell. He said it in Parliament as Minister for Immig in 1947:

    “Two Wongs don’t make a White”

    V funny, if v non-PC

  264. 264
    Stephen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Don’t know if anyone’s commented on this quote.

    “Mr Clark asked the Liberal Party to accept his “sincere apology … for the damage done by my actions in preparing and distributing a pamphlet in St Mary’s on Tuesday night,” his letter says.

    “I confirm that neither the candidate for Lindsay nor Jackie, nor you, had any advance knowledge of this matter.”"

    Um…isn’t he apologising to the wrong party?

  265. 265
    Musrum
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    A nice one for all of those aspirationals:

    http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDetails.aspx?adid=2006832414

  266. 266
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    258 Bakunin

    Imagine using the booze excuse for vandalising a cementery? Trashing a car? Putting a swastika graffiti on a synagogue?

    I wonder if it would wash?

  267. 267
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Oh no, it’s the Liberals he needs to apologise too.
    Why would he apologise to Labor for sealing their victory?

  268. 268
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Bakunin, I posted on the Hun, but I doubt they’ll let it go up:

    “Oh, I know what you mean! The other day I got so p*ssed that I took a 4-be-2 and smashed the windows of my local synagogue, then started yelling at some arabs to “go back home” at the train station, before picking a fight with some 10 year old Sudanese migrants …. you mean like that?”

  269. 269
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    “Oh no, it’s the Liberals he needs to apologise to”, I meant.

  270. 270
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    gotta love Glen and other Libs complaining about the media. The ONE factor that has contributed most to the Howard is a hero mythology is media bias in his favour. Give me a break

  271. 271
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Do go to Musrum’s link @ 264.

    It’s a scream.

  272. 272
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    The Libs only meant to say sorry and not apologise. There is a difference, you know.

  273. 273
    Joffaboy
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Slaughterhouse #5 – 2 days to go

  274. 274
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    George # 34 a “heroine” shooting gallery? And who will shoot these poor courageous women – a unionist with a top hat a cape and a twirly moustache?

  275. 275
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    261 Julie. Good one Julie.

  276. 276
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    I’d be surprised if there was a Newspoll released for tomorrows GG. They usually appear on election day.

  277. 277
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    OK, has anyone else other than Grooski heard anything about the polls coming out tomorrow?

  278. 278
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    We’re stronger, prouder and richer than the Muslims: PM

  279. 279
    Steve K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Here’s part of a report on today’s speech at the NPC:

    “When it comes to the Murray-Darling plan, we have seen the most disgraceful obstruction from the Victorian Labor government,” the prime minister told the National Press Club in Canberra.

    Mr Bracks, who has since been replaced as Victoria premier by John Brumby, withheld support for the plan at a meeting between Mr Howard and the premiers on February 23.

    “In a private meeting he said: ‘John, just give me a few weeks. I’ve got to bring a change of attitude inside my own government – it’ll be okay, we’ll sign up’,” Mr Howard said.

    “It’s now the 22nd of November and we’re still not signed up.”

    It’s interesting to see that Howard is prepared to reveal what was said (or so he claims) in a private meeting when his political life is at stake. I look forward his reaction who others are prepared to say what went on in private meetings with him. His reputation is going to cop a hammering over the next 12 months and he will not be able to claim the moral high ground about the details of private meetings remaining private..

  280. 280
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Any changes in the national batting market? That’ll be the key. I suspect now would be the time to jump on the Coalition if you want a good pay-out.

  281. 281
    hugorune
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    279 – or if you want to throw money away :)

  282. 282
    Nick
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    The Jackie Kelly thing actually made me sick to the stomach. I no longer have any interest in the ALP winning a modest majority so the Libs can keep a parliamentary eye on them. The LNP deserves to lose all the seats they can, they will only have themselves to blame. Check out Kelly trying to laugh it off here: http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=327460 if you want your blood boiled. Stick around for Laurie Oakes’ scathing analysis at the end. Bring on the bloodbath.

  283. 283
    Francis
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    I have been watching the markets today too but no movement. Maybe grooski is right about Galaxy getting ready to give labor the heebie jeebies one last time

  284. 284
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    No movement on betting markets (though I haven’t checked betfair, which always seems to bounce around).

  285. 285
    ND
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    We know from the last election that the final polls were pretty good as far as primaries, stuffed on 2PP and not as accurate as the betting market was.

  286. 286
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Musrum Says:

    “A nice one for all of those aspirationals:”

    http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDetails.aspx?adid=2006832414

    That’s hilarious! :-)

  287. 287
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    HAHA George – the HUN posted your message! :)

  288. 288
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Are people here saying that Galaxy is showing 50/50???????

    Overall or for a particular seat??

  289. 289
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Toby @ 285 – never expected that! I thought they moderated those pages.

  290. 290
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    No Michael, the result is ‘too close to call’. No outcomes known yet.

  291. 291
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Was Newspoll 50-50 too close to call on election day in 2004?

  292. 292
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Bahahaha. If Galaxy says that they are full of it!

  293. 293
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Post election landslide comments:

    Howard: Hyacinth is not going to be happy
    Costello: Does anyone know where the rodents gone. I want to meet with him alone, in a room, with this baseball bat.
    Abbott: that’s bullshit
    Downer: Vile ingrates! The aust people deserve a good spanking…
    Hockey: can I stop saying ‘union bosses now’
    Milne: ‘i never had relations with that man’ (tip).
    Shanaghan: ’sets the coalition up nicely to regain office in the year 2020.
    Jackie Kelly’s husband: ‘muslim Jehad!!
    Brendan Nelson: ‘i voted labor once’
    Andrew Robb: ‘we’ll see you in court’

    Anyone have some other possibilities…

  294. 294
    Martin B
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, Im an ACN man too

    Would expect no less from the voice of progressive elitism :-)

  295. 295
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Glen’s favorite song:

    JULIE, DO YOU LOVE ME ?
    As recorded by Bobby Sherman

    Whoa-oh
    Julie, Julie, Julie, do you love me?
    Julie, Julie, Julie, do you care?
    Julie, Julie, are you thinking of me?
    Julie, Julie, will you still be there?

    http://www.superseventies.com/sl_juliedoyaloveme.html
    http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/b/bobbysherman10358/doyoulovemejulie335886.html

  296. 296
    slartybardfast
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    That Domain.com thingy is great!… lol

  297. 297
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    279 [I suspect now would be the time to jump on the Coalition if you want a good pay-out.]

    There is never a good time to back a loser, what have you got against backing winners?

  298. 298
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Steve K @ 278,
    The water thing was hardly the Victorian Government’s finest hour, though, was it?
    The impression I get is that they essentially delayed the process for about 9 months, just to help Rudd win. (Presumably it will all now get sorted out quickly and will be portrayed as a “triumph for Labor’s new Federalism”).
    Bracks should come out and say that Howard has verballed him, if that is the case.

  299. 299
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Anyone wanna have a go at writing out Howard’s concession speech?

  300. 300
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    There’s no way Galaxy will show 50-50. I suspect they might even call a 52-48 result too close to call, though I think it should really be 51-49 for a ‘too close to call’ result.

    If they really do get a result like that in the final poll, and ACN and Newspoll don’t, Galaxy will lose a lot of credibility if they are wrong.

  301. 301
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    slartybardfast Says: “That Domain.com thingy is great!… lol”

    I’m made a high res copy of it on our xerox here and saved the page for later – good fun :-)

  302. 302
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Paul K that could be my favourite but that would gross out the Julie who posts on pollbludger lol.

  303. 303
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    betfair – someone was asking just a bit ago

    alp – 1.24 coalition 4.90
    lindsay – 1.01 alp, 7.00 liberal, anyone else 25

  304. 304
    Pi
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    They were just blowing off steam.

  305. 305
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Where is this galaxy stuff coming from?

  306. 306
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Unitl I see the Galaxy poll I will be a doubting Thomas

  307. 307
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Toby @297, meaningless platitudes, and short.
    And no tears I suspect, he absolutely knows he is gone already.

  308. 308
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    well 60% of SKY viewers think the Lindsay affair will harm the governments chances in the seat. That probably equates to 90% of the community!!!

  309. 309
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    I think Howard’s concession speech will be uncharacteristically gracious. He will thank everybody. He will wish the country well.

    Then he will say goodbye.

    Forever.

  310. 310
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Michael — it’s a rumour passed on by Grooski. No idea whether it is true.

  311. 311
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    Geepee even if he loses he’ll be liked by more Australians than Paul J Keating.

  312. 312
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    My guess is galaxy will be static at 53; the other will rise a point to 55.

    What Morgan blows out to is anyone’s guess.

  313. 313
    BrissyRod
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    lol @ Glen

  314. 314
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says: “Geepee even if he loses he’ll be liked by more Australians than Paul J Keating.”

    you poor, deluded Liberal voter

  315. 315
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    The Galaxy Poll is for Higgins. :-P

  316. 316
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    310 [Geepee even if he loses he’ll be liked by more Australians than Paul J Keating.]

    It’s the first thing I’ll have ever liked about Howard when he loses.

  317. 317
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Surely the polls will come out saturday not tomorrow?!?!

  318. 318
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Geepee even if he loses he’ll be liked by more Australians than Paul J Keating.

    Everyone loves Keating now, especially the kids, look at the number of PJK fanclubs on facebook.

  319. 319
    ND
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    ruawake, does that mean there is no National Galaxy Poll?

  320. 320
    Dinsdale Piranha
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    310

    Yes, Glen, and the most popular car in Australia has hitherto been a Holden Commodore. But that doesn’t mean it’s better than a Maserati

  321. 321
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Grooski reckons they’re all out overnight.

  322. 322
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    ND there is meant to be a National Galaxy Poll

  323. 323
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    all Labor party members

  324. 324
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Re 301,

    Glen Says:

    November 22nd, 2007 at 4:03 pm
    Paul K that could be my favourite but that would gross out the Julie who posts on pollbludger lol.

    No, not offended :) ……. that song, btw, was big in America when it first came out and I was about 12 as I recall. I have lived with this one for a number of years ;-) … and besides, when you guys all mention my name with no surname I know who you are talking about anyways ;-)

  325. 325
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    So long as ACN stays above or equal to 53-47 I will be confident. If any of the polls comes in at 52-48 I will be a bit nervous, because we haven’t had a poll like that since Rudd has been leader have we?

  326. 326
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Geepee @ 308,
    Actually (showing my age a bit here) Howard’s 1987 concession speech was the most gracious I can remember (though I don’t remember them all). I don’t think he’s very likely to disgrace himself on the night.

  327. 327
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    He’ll lose alright.

    And I disagree about PJK. e is still widely admired by many, me inc.

    Not many people admire, or even like, Howard.

    It’s not even auf wiedersehen. It’s Untergang (or Götterdämmerung)

  328. 328
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    301
    Glen Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 4:03 pm
    Paul K that could be my favourite but that would gross out the Julie who posts on pollbludger lol.

    Glen,

    So many Julie’s. So little time.

  329. 329
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    ruawake Says: “The Galaxy Poll is for Higgins. :-P

    Is this true?

  330. 330
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Madonna King is having a panel discussion on the polls tomorrow at 8:30 am.

    Apparently all the major polls will be out. Antony Green is listed as one of the commentators.

  331. 331
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Still reckon the polls will be out Saturday

  332. 332
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Ruawake: you’re joking! There’s no way anyone would be polling Higgins.

  333. 333
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    ruawake Says: “The Galaxy Poll is for Higgins. :-P

    Is this true?

    No, it’s another short and jocular comment.

  334. 334
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    I doubt there’ll be anything tonight. They usually all poll big right up to the last day to get the most accurate reading for bragging rights. Galaxy releasing a national poll today wouldn’t make sense -

  335. 335
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    George

    No sorry.

  336. 336
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Newspoll and AC Nielsen put out their last minute polls in the Saturday/election day papers, or that’s what they’ve done in previous years.

  337. 337
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s interview on after the commercial break on Sky …..

  338. 338
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    I am not so sure what coverage to watch on Saturday?

    ABC -Gillard and Minchin zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
    7 – Hockey Kennet, Beattie
    9 – Ray and Oakes

    ?????

  339. 339
    Observer
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Peachy @ 298

    ” b) The Australian Rain Corp is 75% Swiss-owned, and one of the main if not the chief shareholders in this Swiss company is Turnbull. Therefore his grant of $10 million is effectively a payoff to himself ”

    Looks like Turnbull is going the way of the ‘Tirpitz’ – didn’t even get out of the shed for a run.

  340. 340
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    If it really is 50:50, David Spears will no doubt be crowing about it on Sky.

  341. 341
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    I assume the Madonna King interview with Green is about the existing polls and the State breakdowns.

  342. 342
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 310: Will John Howard have a musical written about him? I doubt it.

  343. 343
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Julie let me gues what he’s going to say. whilst moving his right arm all over the place

    When it comes to…

    Working families…

  344. 344
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Very mean of Grooski to lob a rumour grenade into the discussion and then leave. Now I am chained to my computer for the next 12-24 hours. Grrrrrr.

  345. 345
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    I thought we’d already received confirmation a while ago that some were being released tomorrow. Nothing new.

  346. 346
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    who the f* is madonna king?

  347. 347
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Andos the Great Says: “Glen @ 310: Will John Howard have a musical written about him? I doubt it.”

    Andos, they already have – it’s called “Springtime for Hitler”

  348. 348
    jasmine
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Howard – Keating

    Man who wasted boom – Man who created boom

    They will be linked forever with Howard the loser who wasted the opportunies Keatings courage created.

    :)

  349. 349
    Nathan
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Hope Rudd cracks a ton on saturday

  350. 350
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Well everybody. I’m off now. Got no work at all done today – my first ever period of posting to this addictive site.

    Love youse all (even you Glen, at least you have the civilising trait of speaking German).

    Two more sleeps!

  351. 351
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    Glen: I’d go for a combination of the ABC and Nine.
    Channel 7 trying to turn it into some light entertainment Sunrise type program: no thanks!

  352. 352
    Gippslander
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Glen Says:
    November 22nd, 2007 at 4:06 pm
    Geepee even if he loses he’ll be liked by more Australians than Paul J Keating.

    My guess is that after he loses a lot of Howard lovers will realise what an arid dead end he led them down.

    Over the last year PJK’s stocks are beginning to rise as the ALP is at last admitting that it was His reforms that enabled the rainbow economy we had… which Howard and Costelloe ruined by looking for the pot ‘o gold from their hammocks.
    His overweening pride is slowly being forgotten, and we are again remembering his devestating wit!
    Neither will be loved, but PJK will be admired.

  353. 353
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    “Keating the Musical”
    “Howard the ####”……….wont get past the censors

  354. 354
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Always watch ABC, nothing else. Hopefully this year we get to see a wry grin from Kerry Obrien, rather than a look of panic and astonishment :)

  355. 355
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Ah, there’s nothing like a bit of poll anxiety. That dreaded 52-48 or worse is circling in peoples minds like a rabid hyena. I don’t think we’re gonna see it..

  356. 356
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Madonna King ABC Radio Brisbane 612. http://www.abc.net.au/brisbane

  357. 357
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    But im going to tape it so i’ve got to choose thats the trouble, ill probably do ABC but those smug ABC journos may give me the red ass if we lose.

    Let me guess, Kerry with a beaming smile says and “we’re now crossing to the new member for Bennelong” grrrrrr!

  358. 358
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Keating the musical will be rated M 15+ too much swearing!

  359. 359
    middle man
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    madonna king is 612 ABC Brisbane. equivalent of 702 ABC Sydney.

  360. 360
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    345 [who the f* is madonna king?]
    Local Courier Mail radio presenter in Brisbane.

  361. 361
    Aristotle
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Scholars, I thought these might be of interest.

    Final Polls

    1987 election      L/NP             ALP
    Newspoll            43 (-3)          48.5  (+2.7)
    Morgan              44 (-2)          48     (+2.2)
    Result                46                45.8

    1990 election    L/NP             ALP
    Newspoll            39.5 (-4)      44.5  (+2.1)
    Morgan              42  (-1.5)     39.5  (+0.1)
    Result                43.5            39.4

    1993 election    L/NP              ALP
    Newspoll            45   (+0.7)    44 (-0.8)
    Morgan              44.5 (+0.2)   45 (+0.2)
    Result                44.3             44.8

    1996 election    L/NP               ALP
    Newspoll            48  (+1)        40.5 (+1.8)
    Morgan              42   (-5)        43    (+4.3)
    ACN                  46  (-1)         41    (+2.3)
    Result                47                38.7

    1998 election    L/NP             ALP
    Newspoll            40 (+0.5)      44   (+3.9)
    Morgan              43 (+3.5)      39   (-1.1)
    ACN                   42  (+2.5)    40    (-0.1)
    Result                39.5             40.1

    2001 election    L/NP                ALP
    Newspoll            46    (+2.9)   38.5 (+0.7)
    Morgan              38.5 (-4.6)    43.5 (+5.7)
    ACN                   46   (+2.9)    38   (+0.2) 
    Result                43.1             37.8

    2004 election    L/NP                 ALP
    Newspoll            45    (-1.7)      39   (+1.4)
    Morgan              45.5 (-1.2)      38.5 (+0.9)
    ACN                   49   (+2.3)      37   (-0.6)
    Galaxy               46   (-0.7)       39   (+1.4)
    Result                46.7                37.6

  362. 362
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Husband of Lib candidate quits over flyer

    THE husband of Liberal candidate Karen Chijoff has quit the party after admitting his role in distributing a bogus leaflet in the marginal Sydney seat of Lindsay.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22803398-12377,00.html

  363. 363
    Jai-mei
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen promise me you won’t cry on election night. I took 1996 with dignity and I even gave John Howard a go for a few months until he proved himself to be the rodent he is today. I hope you’ll give Rudd a go as well.
    love n kisses

  364. 364
    middle man
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    ABC all the way. I dont want adverts roooning me evening! 7 reckons they’ll be ad free until the outcome is known. they must have some inside knowledge that is going to be a landslide and they can put the ads on by 7pm.

  365. 365
    NOT SO MAD MAX
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    Have you had a call from John Howard at your place.
    Well I have and it sounded so warm and personable.
    He’s “gunna” help families with rebates, make home purchasing more affordable and other stuff too. What a guy.
    Sorry missed the rest of it as I was dry-retching at the time.

  366. 366
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    Aristotle – cheers for that. Basically shows what we all know – the polls are rarely, if ever, a true representation of what will happen.

  367. 367
    MGM
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:21 pm | Permalink

    There don’t appear to have been any updates on individual seat odds on Portlandbet for a couple of days now. Anyone know if they only occasionally update these? It would seem unlikely that there wouldn’t have been aby change at all in 48 hours?

  368. 368
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Ah, there’s nothing like a bit of poll anxiety. That dreaded 52-48 or worse is circling in peoples minds like a rabid hyena. I don’t think we’re gonna see it..

    Nice image, that about sums it up.

    I think it’ll be pretty astounding if we have our first 52-48 result. I’m thinking Galaxy will have us at 53-47. But given the MOE of these polls, a 52-48 result is entirely possible even if the election ends up being 54-46.

    I’ll take an average of Galaxy, ACN and Newspoll, with a bit more weight on ACN I think.

  369. 369
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Jai-mei if Unca Howie bites the dust i won’t shed a tear because i know what good he’s done for Australia and history will be kind for him at least those histories not written by the rabid left.

    The only reason why i wont give Rudd a go is he’s got no experience ill be waiting till he makes a blunder and it wont take long trust me.

    Oh and you can be sure if Howard loses he wont blubber like Fraser, John can take it like a man. The question is will Rudd cry if he loses by the barest of margins?

  370. 370
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    I’ll be watching the ABC for Antony, but Seven is tempting if only for the chance of seeing Hockey lose his seat live on air.

  371. 371
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Keating the musical will be rated M 15+ too much swearing!

    I don’t think it is:

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/entertainment/return-of-the-musical-we-had-to-have/2007/04/11/1175971180129.html

  372. 372
    slackboy
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    What’s going on here?????

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22803410-5001021,00.html

    This insanity has to stop!!!

  373. 373
    SeanofPerth
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    What is the origin of this Galaxy rumour?

    And is it a trustworthy sourcE?

  374. 374
    ND
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    If he loses by the barest of margins we probably won’t know the outcome on Saturday night. Close elections can drag for a while…

  375. 375
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    sky are replaying the Howard interview instead of showing the Rudd interview. what the???

  376. 376
    Frustrated
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure about the galaxy poll coming in that low….will wait and see!!

    Happy to see Telegraph is recommending a vote for Rudd – I never thought I’d see the day this tabloid would back the ALP!! I wonder if Uncle Rupert has given them his blessing?

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph

    Don’t know how to make the link work – sorry!!

  377. 377
    George
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    The Daily Telegraph back Rudd! Holy Camoly!

  378. 378
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    371 Sean

    It was a little joke by someone about 2 hours ago – pay it no mind

  379. 379
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Bennelong on Centrebet.

    Howard 1.63
    Maxine 2.15

    :)

  380. 380
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Sweepstake for Sat Night: At what time will someone say “It’s early days yet”.

  381. 381
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    “Serenity Now, Insanity Later”

  382. 382
    PJK for President
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    looking at the Tele, I think the whale should be called Kevin07…

  383. 383
    SeanofPerth
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Thanks NB at 376, i was fretting!

  384. 384
    ND
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Wow, the Tele to back A Rudd Labor Government. Hoodathunkit…

  385. 385
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    Did the Daily Telegrph back Carr before he passed onto Iemma?

  386. 386
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    The Daily Telegraph backs Kevin Rudd
    From: The Daily Telegraph
    November 22, 2007
    AFTER backing John Howard and the Coalition at every federal election since 1998, The Daily Telegraph will tomorrow recommend a vote for Kevin Rudd and Labor.

    In its election-eve editorial, The Daily Telegraph argues that Mr Howard has dealt himself out of the equation by failing to serve a full term – and by denying the democratic right of voters to elect or reject Peter Costello as Prime Minister.

    In contrast, it argues that Kevin Rudd has shown a commitment to the future, with better policies for education and the environment – but warns that he must stand up to unions and prevent them from running the show.

  387. 387
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    367 [Jai-mei if Unca Howie bites the dust i won’t shed a tear because i know what good he’s done for Australia and history will be kind for him at least those histories not written by the rabid left.]

    Glen,That’s one explanation but the more likely reason is the delusion.

  388. 388
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    “It was The Sun wot won it”

    News Corp loves nothing better than a winner do they.

  389. 389
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    The next polls will be the most accurate of this election, although the full effect of Lindsaygate will not be taken into account. It doesn’t help their credibility if their not.

  390. 390
    Asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    '"I would have thought that if this is the case, that we - I hope - live in a society where we treat husbands and wives, although we respect the closeness of their relationship, we treat them as individuals," Mr Howard said.

    "We shouldn't automatically transfer blame for the deeds of one onto the other, and that we allow the other partner to the marriage the opportunity of being treated independently and respectfully.'

    Is this the same Howard who attacked Rudd after Therese’gate’?

  391. 391
    Ice444
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    I think at 6.30 p.m aedt when the libs have lost all 5 of the act seats :)

  392. 392
    gusface
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    i take back anything bad i ever said against rupe

    except for the true stuff :)

  393. 393
    nath
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    insanity has arrivd earlier than glen anticipated. much earlier.

  394. 394
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    I shouldn’t be surprised about the Daily Terror backing Rudd. They’ve been gradually backing away from the Rodent recently. Good news for Labor, it’ll help a lot in marginal seats on the outskirts of the Sydney Metro area.

  395. 395
    Asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Not sure if anyone posted this before:

    http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDetails.aspx?adid=2006832414

  396. 396
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    The Daily Telegraph is a commie bolshy union rag of no influence or importance…
    always has been and always will be
    Murdoch is showing his true colours – CLASS TRAITOR

  397. 397
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    It didn’t look like a joke to me. It was just someone saying, quite seriously, that the Galaxy result would be ‘too close to call’. There was no clarification of whether this would be in relation to their national 2PP result or the individual seat polling that they’ve been doing.

  398. 398
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    Why would the Telegraph, which will publish the Galaxy, back Rudd if the next Galaxy is “too close to call”? Why back a possible loser when you have the polling information prior to anyone else?

    I call shenanigans on this rumour.

  399. 399
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    I reckon sitting through hours of Channel 7’s lollipop coverage would be worth it if I got to see Joe Hockey lose his safe seat live on national television.

  400. 400
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    It won’t change a vote. Nice though

  401. 401
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:30 pm | Permalink

    392,

    Combined with the Sunday Telegraph, it is worth its weight in gold to Mike Bailey :)

  402. 402
    slackboy
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    Chris B @ 387
    Actually the next poll has every chance of being as wrong as all those from the last 12 months. Only Saturday night can tell us what people are thinking.

  403. 403
    Blacklight
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    bv

    here here

  404. 404
    Tory Crimes
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Probably already noted but Laura Tingle on News Radio confirmed it was the Tory rent-a-crowd cheering on Ratty and booing journos with the temerity to ask questions suitable questions and not the News Corp table.

  405. 405
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Spears will have his interview with Rudd at 5pm, time just announced on screen …

  406. 406
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    This pamphletgate could turn a few newspapers.

  407. 407
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    William can I humbly suggest opening a new thread? This 50-50 prank is getting out of hand.

  408. 408
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    So if all the polls come out tomorrow when can we expect news of the results?

    Will we hear some tonight on Agenda/Lateline?

  409. 409
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Betfair odds have narrowed slightly (ie towards Govt) in the last ten minutes.
    Could be anything, but interesting in the light of this Galaxy rumour.

  410. 410
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    This pamphletgate could turn a few newspapers.

    Hopefully the wusses at fairfax… I’m looking at you Andrew Jaspan.

  411. 411
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    50-50 from Galaxy

  412. 412
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    409

    Glen, you are an evil man.

  413. 413
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    Glen, do you know that about 50-50, or are you just torturing everyone?

  414. 414
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    If the Galaxy does have it “too close to call”; then Galaxy is wrong.

    My guess is it doesnt, and we’re getting odd rumours: probably still 53.

  415. 415
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Predictions for other newspapers tomorrow.

    I think the SMH in Sydney will sit on the fence and not pick a side, like they did in 2004
    The Government Gazette: another plug for Howard, although reluctantly, and only because Rudd wouldn’t retain AWAs.

  416. 416
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    50-50 from Galaxy in Menzies ;) ;) ;)

  417. 417
    Asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    409 Glen

    Galaxy were polling in Mitchell when they got 50/50. :P

  418. 418
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Dyno.

    It was someones opinion, no basis in fact.

  419. 419
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps a 53 from ACN and Newspoll and a 51 from Galaxy. I could imagine that.

  420. 420
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    That’s the rumour isn’t it Dyno?

    and if the markets firm further this would suggest it is a possibility :)

  421. 421
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Further to me @ 407, can a rumour on PB move Betfair?

  422. 422
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    Glen, do you have any new information to base that on?

  423. 423
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    396 BV For the last time there is at present no Galaxy poll. It was a joke.

    400 slackboy Yes that’s right, but for commercial reasons, it is very very important to get this one right. Maybe bragging rights for the next election, would be another term to use.

  424. 424
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Holy shit! Just got word ACN is 57-43!!

    Just scaring Glen. I have no idea :)

  425. 425
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    At the very worst Galaxy will be 53. It will be 54plus on the night

  426. 426
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Dyno @ 419, I wouldn’t be surprised!

  427. 427
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Glen, the thread over at ozelections2007 board quoting the supposed Galaxy poll figures was just deleted by the moderators.

  428. 428
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    so its not true?

  429. 429
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Sorry about that bludgers…. As you were…. Statement of regret etc.

  430. 430
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Good one Lefty E

  431. 431
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Chris B, Grooski indicated earlier there is a Galaxy and the result will be too close to call. Since then she/he has not posted any further. I have no reason to doubt that.

    Perhaps Rudd has been trying to warn us all not to get our hopes up? I dunno…

  432. 432
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    maybe its a bennelong poll?

  433. 433
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Until there’s something to back up the claim, we have to regard it as just rumour or someone’s idea of a joke.

  434. 434
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Breaking news!
    New Galaxy Poll

    60 ALP
    40 COALITION

    If only it were true LOL

  435. 435
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    so who started the skuttlebut?

  436. 436
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    DT is backing Rudd??? Wtf is going on? Next there’ll be dogs and cats getting married and talking rabbits!!! ARRRGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!

  437. 437
    Big Blind Dave
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Just rang Galaxy and they said there is a 50/50 chance that Glen is a cross dresser

  438. 438
    Rob
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    The polls have been rock solid all year 55:45. At most they will tighten to 54:46. Stop stressing everyone :)

  439. 439
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Narrow polls tonight/tomorrow would probably be a good thing in some ways for the ALP.

    There’s a bit of complacency going around in the electorate. It would be good to stir some people into action, particularly off the back of this race pamphlet saga.

    There was always the chance that Howard would get a sympathy vote if it looked like Rudd was going to waltz it in.

  440. 440
    DLP
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Hi all,

    Just catching up onthis thread.

    Interesting link from Domain.com. I think it is a Deceased Estate up for sales.

    http://www.domain.com.au/Public/PropertyDetails.aspx?adid=2006832414

  441. 441
    barney
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Ice 44 said
    I think at 6.30 p.m aedt when the libs have lost all 5 of the act seats

    That’ll be some trick seeing as there’s only 4 seats (2 H of R, 2 sen)

  442. 442
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Kirribilli ‘for sale’

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/federalelection2007/kirribilli-for-sale/2007/11/22/1195321932510.html

    It’s made the news!

  443. 443
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    ALL THE TALK OF “50-50 GALAXY” IS GARBAGE. If youre going to say what you think will happen, please state this. Dont just post “galaxy 50-50″.

  444. 444
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Lefty E: Are you sorry but not apologising or what?

  445. 445
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Bloody Grooski. He/she started the ‘too close to call’ thing and then left immediately after.

  446. 446
    gusface
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    DLP

    bit worried about the smell though

    11yrs of rattus shite sure is going to leave a pong :)

  447. 447
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    437 Misty

    “There’s a bit of complacency going around in the electorate.” You have got to be kidding, one word Lindsaygate.

  448. 448
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    Labor on Betfair now solidly dug in at $1.26. Would take more than $10k to move the price in either direction.
    Coalition $4.70. It’s a thinner market, though, so the price could move more readily.

  449. 449
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    It wouldn’t shock me however if Galaxy is 51:49 and the rest of them are 55:45.
    David Briggs isn’t to be trusted!

  450. 450
    Big Blind Door Knocker
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    This election will be a referendum on Glens inability to handle the truth

  451. 451
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Where is Mad Cow?

    Patterson

    1.60 Libs
    2.10 ALP

  452. 452
    Cannon
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    First time poster, after lurking a while.

    Didn’t Grooski say (in 201) that the source of his/her “Galaxy 50:50″ rumour was from “talking to ABC radio people this morning”?

    If so, how would ABC radio have that much advance knowledge of a Galaxy poll?

  453. 453
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Keating was only ever disliked by the outer suburban punters and Lib hacks like yourself. The ones who generally know jack sh.t about politics and barely watch the news. They can hardly remember him now. The elites that the Howard has spent the last ten years deriding are the ones that get to write history and they’re not going to be nice.

  454. 454
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    JFC Says: at 37,thread earlier today.
    November 22nd, 2007 at 7:38 am

    From a small Coorey piece in the SMH, which may be overlooked on such a newsworthy day.

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/a-party-losing-its-youthful-appeal-resorts-to-hy

    How come the article has the dirty scumbag ad by the disgraceful and disgraced Libs running on that article?

    Isn’t there an advertising blackout?

    And what does the SMH think its playing at, positioning the ad on that article?

  455. 455
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Chris @ 445: Sure the Lindsaygate thing will score some votes.

    But have a read through today’s cabby panel on Crikey. There’s been a recurring theme for some time in that that Rudd is expected to win, but people are more and more unconvinced that’s actually what they want.

    Hopefully today’s drama seals the deal, but who knows? Can’t hurt to have people galvanised behind the ALP in the fear they make not make it across the line.

  456. 456
    Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Crikey at 450, the blackout applies only to TV and radio ads. Billboards, newspapers and the web are immune. Ridiculous, I know.

  457. 457
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    CW

    No advertising blackout on the internet.

  458. 458
    noel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    DT backs Labor?! Surely time to put the blue tarp over the Coalition car wreck.

  459. 459
    PJK for President
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    “No advertising blackout on the internet”

    There is for me…Firefox + NoScript extension. Magic stuff.

  460. 460
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    TV without political ads tonight: woohoo!

  461. 461
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    In my view there is no way that Kevin Rudd can lose this election.
    He can almost win it in Queensland alone where the numbers may well be neatly reversed.
    The Daily Telegraph has done the sensible thing and backed its readers.
    Note the decision was made after consulting with their readers on their blog.
    It would look a bit silly of David Penberthy to back the retiring John Howard and then have him lose his seat as well as the election in a landslide.
    Obviously Rupert Murdoch, who is becoming more moderate in his old age, would not mind David backing Kevin Rudd.
    I believe Rupert Murdoch may well be of the view that Kevin Rudd will be a considerably better PM now than John Howard.
    This campaign is the worst Coalition campaign I have seen in thirty five years of politics.
    Even if the Galaxy poll shows it to be close it should be discounted. It’s only a single poll. The aggregate of all the polls in the last week would tell a more accurate story.
    Also the betting market has always been right.
    It’s not a question of whether Labor can win, it’s much more a question of by how many seats.

  462. 462
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding.

    Just so you don’t get withdrawal symptoms. :-P

  463. 463
    Shanghai Surprise
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Can someone provide the Sky News internet link for the Rudd interview at 5pm?

    Thanks

  464. 464
    Pathological Logic
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Murdoch likes backing winners, and more to the point, having it known that it was his support which made the difference. IF, and it is a huge if, the Galaxy is 50:50, is it really beyond the bounds of possibility that a few preference flows and such were meddled with? Result: Tele endorses Rudd, Labor wins massively (which they were going to do anyway), and Murdoch can claim the credit.

    Yeah, I know, I’m too cynical by half. But this is KRM we’re talking about.

  465. 465
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    There’s no way galaxy will be 50-50. At worst it will be 52-48 and the ‘too close to call’ will come from a hocus-pocus analysis of the marginal seats.

  466. 466
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    This talk about which poll is most accurate is pretty useless.

    The way the analysis will go is this:

    Poll that favours Labor more will be backed by Labor supporters
    Poll that favours the Coalition more will be backed by Coalition supporters
    Poll in the middle will be forgotten by all (and will most likely be correct)

    We’re now so close to the polls will probably overlap on their MOE (like what happened last time), so it’s all pretty irrelevant anyway – one poll will be as good as another…

  467. 467
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Stop being foolish all. No chance of a 50:50. This one is too important for business to be fudged so badly.

  468. 468
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    what’s this about the odds firming in the govt’s favour?

  469. 469
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Richard Jones 457 – Interesting post.
    We all sit here and say that the Libs get a good run by most of the media, and that is true. They do. But theyve also been in power for 11 years. Heads of media are hardly going to go to the Opposition, who keep losing elections, to discuss media opportunities!
    What is happening is that Howard is basically gone. The journo’s know it. If the Coalition had these polls for 6 months running, then we wouldn’t even be disussing the possibility of them losing.
    So, with this in mind, the papers need to position themselves for the next 3 years. You will see a big switch after the election from many typically right-win publications, claiming their ground with Labor.

  470. 470
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Michael — Centrebet and Sportingbet are unchanged on the national market.

  471. 471
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    thanks Ashley – i sort of read bits and pieces on here and find it hard to follow the thread – can be nerve racking

  472. 472
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    Swing Lowe @ 462
    You are usually one of the most enjoyable posters in here, but to be honest I can’t fathom what you’re trying to say in this post 462.

  473. 473
    SirEggo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Whoever joked about the 50/50 should be shot. Seriously.

    Lefty E, dude, don’t do that. But I accept your apology

    39 hours till booths open…….

  474. 474
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    By the way – the final polls in isolation dont mean anything. Even with small MoE’s. You need to look at them over a period of time. All 3 polls could suggest Labor 51-49 or even 50-50 and I would still be confident of a Labor win.

  475. 475
    Spiros
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    At 52:48 Labor wins easily. No party has ever lost with 52% of the TPP. In fact no party has ever lost with 51%.

    This marginal seat targeting stuff is pure Liberal propaganda to give the impression that they are still in the game despite the polls. It is rubbish, just rubbish.

  476. 476
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Sorry it was 467 Swing Lowe

  477. 477
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Hemingway,

    Looking back at it – neither can I :-)

    Um – I guess what I’m saying is that there is no point in arguing which poll is the most accurate, coz partisans (on both sides) will back the poll that favours them.

  478. 478
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Ive checked the major betting agencies and there is no change. Labor is low $1.20’s and Coalition early to mid $4.00’s, except Betfair where they are $4.75. Hell, these are fugures we only dreamed about, as with the poll figures.

  479. 479
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy 52/48, with ACN bigger margin for Labor

  480. 480
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Just said on Ch 10

  481. 481
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Channel Ten news just said Galaxy is 52 to 46 (strange!) but ACN better for Labor.

  482. 482
    Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Yes, as much as Rudd and Howard sound sincere in their earnest assurances that it will be a tight contest, you really have to discount such talk as self-serving. The polls have consistently pointed all year to a Labor win. The betting agencies are pointing in that direction and the “vibe” suggests it will happen. For there now to be an upset Howard victory just defies logic. But nothing is certain, especially in politics, and I would counsel those here getting excited about Howard’s long-awaited political demise to keep the champagne on ice for another 48 hours

  483. 483
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Swing Lowe, thought I heard 52-46 which made no sense

  484. 484
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Michael,
    Betfair has firmed slightly (for Howard). It’s the site where the punters set the odds, so on the one hand it’s (in a sense) the most accurate up-to-the-minute reflection of what the whole market thinks, but on the other hand it jumps around a lot.
    I don’t think it’s all that significant at this point. It could just be profit-taking, ie people betting against Labor who previously backed them at better odds, and can now lock in a profit.
    I’ll say something if there’s a big shift.

  485. 485
    TofK
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    10 said 52 per cent to 46 (wtf i know, its what he said), while AC has the ALP further ahead.
    This kellygate is terrible for the lnp, they deserve the mother of all canings for this rubbish.

  486. 486
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I heard 52/46, but I thought that Ch 10 had made a mistake…

  487. 487
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    So at worst it’s 52-48, at best 54-46

  488. 488
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    So is it 54 or 52 then? which part is the mistake?

  489. 489
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Channel 10 and Paul B. really hammered the Lindsay pamphlet scandal with two separate reports.

  490. 490
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    52-48 Galaxy, 2 days out from the election? That means Newspoll and ACN will be at LEAST 54-46

  491. 491
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    I’m going with 52/48 – it fits in with the rumours we’ve been hearing all afternoon…

  492. 492
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    yep he said 52/46

  493. 493
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy 52:46 according to Channel 10.

  494. 494
    beentoolong
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy Poll: 52 to 46

    Ten News.

  495. 495
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I refuse to anlyse a poll which doesn’t sum to at least 99.

  496. 496
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Re my 450. That link has disappeared.

    Thanks guys. Then Kevin better add yet another to the ‘continuous barrage of laws, rules and regulations’, as B Bishop suggests.

    Ah.

    New link to article:

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/a-party-losing-its-youthful-appeal-resorts-to-hysteria/2007/11/21/1195321867182.html

  497. 497
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Given that many people now rely on this blog for information I think we should at least make it clear when we are just guesstimating what the polls could be.

  498. 498
    Lindsay voter
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I heard 52 46?? But the other poll has a wider gap.

  499. 499
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Maybe it’s 52/46 with 2% undecided – unlikely though…

  500. 500
    Ace
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    News Flash!

    Kevin Rudd will announce another new policy during his victory speech on Saturday night.

    The new policy will reduce Australia,s carbon footprint and ensure that our future is in good hands forever.

    All coalition voters will be granted assisted passage to anywhere they choose, outside Australian territory.

  501. 501
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Surely you can tell which it is meant to be by the context of what they were saying. A 52-48 result would be a pretty significant result for the media, whereas 54-46 would be all-over-red-rover.

  502. 502
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    No, GB, this is what Ch 10 said

  503. 503
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Channel 10 have lost the plot.

  504. 504
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    They mustve meant that Labor has 52 of the 2PP and 46 of the primary?

  505. 505
    Derek Corbett
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    areaman @ 389

    News has pig-brain “readers” to shepherd.

  506. 506
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    He said 52/46. ACN worse. The news report was an absolute shocker for the Libs.

  507. 507
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    52-46 hey?
    Trust Ten to be first with the news that counts – not!!!

  508. 508
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    492

    I’m with you Swing Lowe, more likely to be 52-48. I reckon 46 just slipped out because hes been saying it all year.

  509. 509
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    What was the tpp in the last galaxy before this one?

  510. 510
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Michael — it was 53-47

  511. 511
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    so it’s barely a change then

  512. 512
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    News Bulletin

    Rattus and Hyacinth are passionate animal lovers and have lots of creatures big and small at Kirribilli house. The downside of course is that Kirribilly is severely pest infested and there are layers upon layers of dog poo. The value of the property has deteriorated significantly to the point that it has been declared unfit for human habitation. No humans have been able to cope with the stench and so it won’t be declared liveable for the foreseeable future.

    The Rodent Removal Pest Control company will commence major excavations on the 24th November 2007.

    Estimated work: $500,000
    Time: 6 months

  513. 513
    Nostradamus
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    ACN worse – so AC Nielsen has 51-49 or 50-50!

    All over red rover for Krudd!

  514. 514
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    53 – 47, excellent. No change then. Landslide territory.

  515. 515
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    No, Nostro – worse for the Libs!

    Margin is bigger in ACN…

  516. 516
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    I can live with 52 from Galaxy, if true. Means ACN will be 54!

    And yes, sorry about that all – but the 50/50 crap was pissing me off.

  517. 517
    John Ryan
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    If he’d meant 52-48 he would have said something like “but Government surging back” or some bullsh-t. I dare say it’s 54-46.

    If not, it’s another shameless rouge released by Galaxy, just when the Coalition needs it most. I didn’t think they’d try that stunt so close to the election – but if they do it’ll be great to see them finally discredited on Sunday morning as being further out than Morgan!

  518. 518
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    Not only is it in MOE, it can be a rounding error here or there, especially taking preferences in to account.

  519. 519
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    GB, assume it is 52/48 until we hear more…

  520. 520
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    514 Nostradamus – somehow I think they may have meant worse for the government.

  521. 521
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Are the other numbers out yet? Can someone summarize in one concise post the actual numbers released so far? I am confused by the numbers listed so far. They don’t add up properly …..

  522. 522
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    When was Galaxy taken, how big is it, blah, blah, blah?

  523. 523
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    Labor won’t mind a 52-48…. staves off talk of a landslide.

  524. 524
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Numbers noted by Ch 10:

    Galaxy 52/46 – yes I know it doesn’t add up to 100, but that’s what they said.

    Also said the Labor lead in ACN was BIGGER, but didn’t say what.

  525. 525
    Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Why doesn’t someone ring Channel Ten and ask them? Be sure to use words of one syllable, though.

  526. 526
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    Summary:

    Galaxy either 52/48 or 54/46, Ten reported it in a confusing way
    ACN no-one knows but Ten said worse than Galaxy (for the Govt it seems)

  527. 527
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    He said ACN was worse for the Liberals

  528. 528
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    Julie, all we’ve heard is apparently Ten news said 52-46. No one exactly sure whether they meant 52-48 or 54-46 (or 52-46 plus 2% undecided??).

  529. 529
    John Ryan
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy polls should be taken with a pinch of cyanide.

  530. 530
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    524 Ashley – do you ACTUALLY know what the Galaxy poll figures are?

  531. 531
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    OK, so Ive now been told that Galaxy is ACTUALLY 54-46, not 52-48… and that ACN is worse. This is unconfirmed info. ANyone know?

  532. 532
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    I didn’t see the news but it could also be 52 2PP, 46 primary.

  533. 533
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    GB – we’re just repeating the numbers said on Ch 10

  534. 534
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    52 -48 Hung parliament according to Ozpoll calculator :-)

  535. 535
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Are we sure it wasn’t 50 to 46 on primaries?

  536. 536
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Just called channel 10 newsroom, they’ve said they’ll correct it later in the bulletin. Wouldn’t tell me what it was though :(

  537. 537
    SirEggo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Bloody Hell

    I wish Ch10 knoew how to count to 100

    Now we’re just running around in circles….

  538. 538
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    RA, I don’t know if it’s primaries or TPP, but the numbers said was 52/46 (seems more likely to be TPP though)

  539. 539
    alpal
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Yes, John – well and truly hung

  540. 540
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Yes but did she say

    “Fifty-two to forty six”

    or

    “Fifty to forty-six”

    Do you see the distinction?

  541. 541
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    524 Ashley - do you ACTUALLY know what the Galaxy poll figures are?

    No!! I’m hanging out for someone to tell us. Just saying that Labor wouldn’t mind 52-48 too much because it will stop people thinking about a landslide and voting against them.

  542. 542
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Doesn’t matter, anyway.

    Just heard researcher reporting on ABC local radio 891 her findings that Liberal Ads most disliked by respondents, for their anti-union and negative, long winded content.

  543. 543
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Sloppy reporting on Ten’s behalf, but 52-48 sounds about right, especially if they are also saying that the margin is bigger for Nielsen.

  544. 544
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    OK – let’s just wait until the correction is issued…

  545. 545
    Peter of Marino
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:17 pm | Permalink

    Come on everybody. Could we please get the numbers right.I don’t know weather to jump for joy or jump off a chair?

  546. 546
    Coota Bulldog
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    It was a slip of the tongue by bongornio. Apparently, the primary vote with galaxy is tied between the ALP and coalition, and the final figure is supposed to be 52-48.

  547. 547
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    541 RA

    It was definitely 52-46 and a mistake by the reporter according to CH10

  548. 548
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Here’s an idea – let’s wait until we have actual confirmation!

    Or we could speculate wildly about different ways of saying different strings of numbers…

  549. 549
    Jim
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Ring Mike Larkin (the overly-friendly idiot weatherman) at Channel Ten and ask him. He would have more clue than anyone in the entire news department IMHBCO.

  550. 550
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    NB 548 — huh?

  551. 551
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Coota, got a source?

  552. 552
    TofK
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Either it was 52TPP and 46 primary (doubtful), or 52-48TPP (probable).
    We have our first ingredient for tonight’s poll cocktail, it is slightly bitter, the sweet stuff to follow!
    I don’t think that the DT would jump in the Labor pool if they thought they were going to drown.

  553. 553
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Coota Bulldog,

    Where did you get that info from?

  554. 554
    John Ryan
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    52-48 is as rouge as they come. No doubt Galaxy will try and explain away the different on Sunday as it being down to the Kelly race-smear leaflet…

  555. 555
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    “Are we sure it wasn’t 50 to 46 on primaries?”

    RA, VERY unlikely. That would only leave 4% for minor parties and undecideds.

  556. 556
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    547 – Coota Bulldog: How can the primary vote be TIED? No chance. Surely…?

  557. 557
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    It was a slip of the tongue by bongornio. Apparently, the primary vote with galaxy is tied between the ALP and coalition, and the final figure is supposed to be 52-48.

    Source?

  558. 558
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Toby — could be 44 each.

  559. 559
    Ian
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    It could be 52-46 on primaries which leaves 2% for others – and a 53-47 TPP.

  560. 560
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    If it is a hung parliament will Bob Katter favour Coalition or Labor he was a former National was he not?

  561. 561
    S
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:20 pm | Permalink

    Have we covered that the Daily Telegraph is advocating Rudd?

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22803410-5001021,00.html

  562. 562
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    551 Ashley

    I called the newsroom and they acknowledged it was a mistake, said they would correct it later in the bulletin.

  563. 563
    John of Melbourne
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    NB so what are the real figures?

  564. 564
    Steveo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Very bad reporting from a dare i say poorly conducted network

  565. 565
    Nostradamus
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    The upshot of it all is that the tortoise gets ever nearer to the hare, and the tortoise will win the race. We shouldn’t forget that the Coalition will probably win the election with 52% of the two party preferred.