Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Newspoll state swings

Time for a new thread. Here’s a chart showing state-level swings to Labor as recorded by Newspoll throughout the campaign. Note that the most recent result seems to indicate a mild Coalition recovery in Victoria being offset by worsening results elsewhere.

620 Comments

Pages: « 18 9 [10] 11 1213 » Show All

  1. 451
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Where is Mad Cow?

    Patterson

    1.60 Libs
    2.10 ALP

  2. 452
    Cannon
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    First time poster, after lurking a while.

    Didn’t Grooski say (in 201) that the source of his/her “Galaxy 50:50″ rumour was from “talking to ABC radio people this morning”?

    If so, how would ABC radio have that much advance knowledge of a Galaxy poll?

  3. 453
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Keating was only ever disliked by the outer suburban punters and Lib hacks like yourself. The ones who generally know jack sh.t about politics and barely watch the news. They can hardly remember him now. The elites that the Howard has spent the last ten years deriding are the ones that get to write history and they’re not going to be nice.

  4. 454
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    JFC Says: at 37,thread earlier today.
    November 22nd, 2007 at 7:38 am

    From a small Coorey piece in the SMH, which may be overlooked on such a newsworthy day.

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/a-party-losing-its-youthful-appeal-resorts-to-hy

    How come the article has the dirty scumbag ad by the disgraceful and disgraced Libs running on that article?

    Isn’t there an advertising blackout?

    And what does the SMH think its playing at, positioning the ad on that article?

  5. 455
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Chris @ 445: Sure the Lindsaygate thing will score some votes.

    But have a read through today’s cabby panel on Crikey. There’s been a recurring theme for some time in that that Rudd is expected to win, but people are more and more unconvinced that’s actually what they want.

    Hopefully today’s drama seals the deal, but who knows? Can’t hurt to have people galvanised behind the ALP in the fear they make not make it across the line.

  6. 456
    Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    Crikey at 450, the blackout applies only to TV and radio ads. Billboards, newspapers and the web are immune. Ridiculous, I know.

  7. 457
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:49 pm | Permalink

    CW

    No advertising blackout on the internet.

  8. 458
    noel
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    DT backs Labor?! Surely time to put the blue tarp over the Coalition car wreck.

  9. 459
    PJK for President
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    “No advertising blackout on the internet”

    There is for me…Firefox + NoScript extension. Magic stuff.

  10. 460
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    TV without political ads tonight: woohoo!

  11. 461
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    In my view there is no way that Kevin Rudd can lose this election.
    He can almost win it in Queensland alone where the numbers may well be neatly reversed.
    The Daily Telegraph has done the sensible thing and backed its readers.
    Note the decision was made after consulting with their readers on their blog.
    It would look a bit silly of David Penberthy to back the retiring John Howard and then have him lose his seat as well as the election in a landslide.
    Obviously Rupert Murdoch, who is becoming more moderate in his old age, would not mind David backing Kevin Rudd.
    I believe Rupert Murdoch may well be of the view that Kevin Rudd will be a considerably better PM now than John Howard.
    This campaign is the worst Coalition campaign I have seen in thirty five years of politics.
    Even if the Galaxy poll shows it to be close it should be discounted. It’s only a single poll. The aggregate of all the polls in the last week would tell a more accurate story.
    Also the betting market has always been right.
    It’s not a question of whether Labor can win, it’s much more a question of by how many seats.

  12. 462
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding F*rt Ding.

    Just so you don’t get withdrawal symptoms. :-P

  13. 463
    Shanghai Surprise
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Can someone provide the Sky News internet link for the Rudd interview at 5pm?

    Thanks

  14. 464
    Pathological Logic
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    Murdoch likes backing winners, and more to the point, having it known that it was his support which made the difference. IF, and it is a huge if, the Galaxy is 50:50, is it really beyond the bounds of possibility that a few preference flows and such were meddled with? Result: Tele endorses Rudd, Labor wins massively (which they were going to do anyway), and Murdoch can claim the credit.

    Yeah, I know, I’m too cynical by half. But this is KRM we’re talking about.

  15. 465
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    There’s no way galaxy will be 50-50. At worst it will be 52-48 and the ‘too close to call’ will come from a hocus-pocus analysis of the marginal seats.

  16. 466
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    This talk about which poll is most accurate is pretty useless.

    The way the analysis will go is this:

    Poll that favours Labor more will be backed by Labor supporters
    Poll that favours the Coalition more will be backed by Coalition supporters
    Poll in the middle will be forgotten by all (and will most likely be correct)

    We’re now so close to the polls will probably overlap on their MOE (like what happened last time), so it’s all pretty irrelevant anyway – one poll will be as good as another…

  17. 467
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:56 pm | Permalink

    Stop being foolish all. No chance of a 50:50. This one is too important for business to be fudged so badly.

  18. 468
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    what’s this about the odds firming in the govt’s favour?

  19. 469
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    Richard Jones 457 – Interesting post.
    We all sit here and say that the Libs get a good run by most of the media, and that is true. They do. But theyve also been in power for 11 years. Heads of media are hardly going to go to the Opposition, who keep losing elections, to discuss media opportunities!
    What is happening is that Howard is basically gone. The journo’s know it. If the Coalition had these polls for 6 months running, then we wouldn’t even be disussing the possibility of them losing.
    So, with this in mind, the papers need to position themselves for the next 3 years. You will see a big switch after the election from many typically right-win publications, claiming their ground with Labor.

  20. 470
    Ashley
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Michael — Centrebet and Sportingbet are unchanged on the national market.

  21. 471
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    thanks Ashley – i sort of read bits and pieces on here and find it hard to follow the thread – can be nerve racking

  22. 472
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    Swing Lowe @ 462
    You are usually one of the most enjoyable posters in here, but to be honest I can’t fathom what you’re trying to say in this post 462.

  23. 473
    SirEggo
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Whoever joked about the 50/50 should be shot. Seriously.

    Lefty E, dude, don’t do that. But I accept your apology

    39 hours till booths open…….

  24. 474
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    By the way – the final polls in isolation dont mean anything. Even with small MoE’s. You need to look at them over a period of time. All 3 polls could suggest Labor 51-49 or even 50-50 and I would still be confident of a Labor win.

  25. 475
    Spiros
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    At 52:48 Labor wins easily. No party has ever lost with 52% of the TPP. In fact no party has ever lost with 51%.

    This marginal seat targeting stuff is pure Liberal propaganda to give the impression that they are still in the game despite the polls. It is rubbish, just rubbish.

  26. 476
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    Sorry it was 467 Swing Lowe

  27. 477
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Hemingway,

    Looking back at it – neither can I :-)

    Um – I guess what I’m saying is that there is no point in arguing which poll is the most accurate, coz partisans (on both sides) will back the poll that favours them.

  28. 478
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Ive checked the major betting agencies and there is no change. Labor is low $1.20’s and Coalition early to mid $4.00’s, except Betfair where they are $4.75. Hell, these are fugures we only dreamed about, as with the poll figures.

  29. 479
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy 52/48, with ACN bigger margin for Labor

  30. 480
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Just said on Ch 10

  31. 481
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Channel Ten news just said Galaxy is 52 to 46 (strange!) but ACN better for Labor.

  32. 482
    Mr Denmore
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    Yes, as much as Rudd and Howard sound sincere in their earnest assurances that it will be a tight contest, you really have to discount such talk as self-serving. The polls have consistently pointed all year to a Labor win. The betting agencies are pointing in that direction and the “vibe” suggests it will happen. For there now to be an upset Howard victory just defies logic. But nothing is certain, especially in politics, and I would counsel those here getting excited about Howard’s long-awaited political demise to keep the champagne on ice for another 48 hours

  33. 483
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Swing Lowe, thought I heard 52-46 which made no sense

  34. 484
    Dyno
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Michael,
    Betfair has firmed slightly (for Howard). It’s the site where the punters set the odds, so on the one hand it’s (in a sense) the most accurate up-to-the-minute reflection of what the whole market thinks, but on the other hand it jumps around a lot.
    I don’t think it’s all that significant at this point. It could just be profit-taking, ie people betting against Labor who previously backed them at better odds, and can now lock in a profit.
    I’ll say something if there’s a big shift.

  35. 485
    TofK
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    10 said 52 per cent to 46 (wtf i know, its what he said), while AC has the ALP further ahead.
    This kellygate is terrible for the lnp, they deserve the mother of all canings for this rubbish.

  36. 486
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Actually, I heard 52/46, but I thought that Ch 10 had made a mistake…

  37. 487
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    So at worst it’s 52-48, at best 54-46

  38. 488
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    So is it 54 or 52 then? which part is the mistake?

  39. 489
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    Channel 10 and Paul B. really hammered the Lindsay pamphlet scandal with two separate reports.

  40. 490
    Toby
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    52-48 Galaxy, 2 days out from the election? That means Newspoll and ACN will be at LEAST 54-46

  41. 491
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    I’m going with 52/48 – it fits in with the rumours we’ve been hearing all afternoon…

  42. 492
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    yep he said 52/46

  43. 493
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy 52:46 according to Channel 10.

  44. 494
    beentoolong
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Galaxy Poll: 52 to 46

    Ten News.

  45. 495
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I refuse to anlyse a poll which doesn’t sum to at least 99.

  46. 496
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Re my 450. That link has disappeared.

    Thanks guys. Then Kevin better add yet another to the ‘continuous barrage of laws, rules and regulations’, as B Bishop suggests.

    Ah.

    New link to article:

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/federal-election-2007-news/a-party-losing-its-youthful-appeal-resorts-to-hysteria/2007/11/21/1195321867182.html

  47. 497
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Given that many people now rely on this blog for information I think we should at least make it clear when we are just guesstimating what the polls could be.

  48. 498
    Lindsay voter
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I heard 52 46?? But the other poll has a wider gap.

  49. 499
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    Maybe it’s 52/46 with 2% undecided – unlikely though…

  50. 500
    Ace
    Posted Thursday, November 22, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    News Flash!

    Kevin Rudd will announce another new policy during his victory speech on Saturday night.

    The new policy will reduce Australia,s carbon footprint and ensure that our future is in good hands forever.

    All coalition voters will be granted assisted passage to anywhere they choose, outside Australian territory.

Pages: « 18 9 [10] 11 1213 » Show All