Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Toil and trouble

Federal Coalition. Today’s Liberal leadership contest is of course being amply covered elsewhere. I will say only that the 6-to-1 odds on Brendan Nelson from SportingBet look remarkably attractive from what I’m hearing. Warren Truss is set to take the Nationals leadership unopposed following the withdrawal of Peter McGauran. No by-elections loom at this stage, but I suspect they will be happening sooner or later in Higgins, Mayo, Berowra and perhaps Lyne.

Queensland Liberals. The state Liberal Party has been plunged into a constitutional crisis by a four-all leadership deadlock between incumbent Bruce Flegg and challenger Tim Nicholls. Flegg and his three supporters voted down a leadership spill motion yesterday, prompting state president Warwick Parer to declare he must “do the honourable thing and stand down”. The two groups might end up holding separate party room meetings today, each claiming official status. Nicholls is associated with the Santo Santoro/Michael Caltabiano faction of the Queensland Liberal Party, and is supported in the party room by John-Paul Langbroek (Surfers Paradise), Jann Stuckey (Currumbin) and Steve Dickson (Kawana). Flegg represents the moderate “western suburbs” faction and is supported by Mark McArdle (Caloundra), Ray Stevens (Robina) and Glen Elmes (Noosa), at least for now: the Courier-Mail reports Flegg’s supporters are united by animus towards the Santoro faction, and would be willing to back a candidate other than Flegg to keep Nicholls out.

Western Australian Liberals. It had long been understood that the looming federal election was the only thing preventing a challenge against Liberal leader Paul Omodei, and the talk is that a spill will be on next week. On Tuesday the ABC reported that Omodei was about to be tapped on the shoulder and asked to make way for Vasse MP Troy Buswell. Omodei – a dangerous man to be around at times – today told the media any colleagues who did so would be “very lucky if they don’t get a good right hook, and they’ll be lucky to get out of the room standing up”. Like his Queensland counterpart Tim Nicholls, Buswell is a first-term MP. Meantime, former leader Colin Barnett has announced he will not seek re-election for his seat of Cottesloe at the state election due in February 2009. Barnett has told The West Australian he has thought better of retiring immediately, because it “wasn’t the right thing to do and a lot of people in my electorate want me to stay”. His enemies in the Liberal Party say he’ s only staying to block any move to recruit Julie Bishop to the state party leadership by having her take his seat at a by-election.

Northern Territory ALP. Clare Martin and her deputy Syd Stirling have both pulled up stumps and moved to the back bench. The Northern Territory News reports that leadership rival Paul Henderson delivered Martin a “gentle ultimatum” a few weeks ago. Martin accepted this without demur as she had lost her enthusiasm for the job following the federal government’s intervention into Aboriginal communities. Mutterings first emerged last November that Martin’s inaction in indigenous affairs had cost her the support of the most of the Aboriginal members of caucus, and that a challenge by Henderson would win the support of 10 out of 19 party room members. Martin and Stirling have both vowed to remain in parliament until the election due in mid-2009, so it does not appear we will be treated to by-elections in Fannie Bay and Nhulunbuy.

In late election counting news, Labor’s Jason Young is back in front of Andrew Laming in Bowman, if only by 21 votes. The pattern of voting in 2004 suggests Young has cleared his biggest hurdle now that pre-polls have been counted (mostly if not entirely), and should be able to keep his nose in front on remaining postal (where he has performed strongly so far), absent and provisional votes. In Herbert, Defence Force votes have slashed Labor’s lead from 528 to 36: the outlook appears better for Labor’s George Colbran now those are out of the way, but like Bowman it’s still close enough that anything could happen. Liberal member Peter Dutton’s lately acquired lead continues to widen in Dickson, and the Liberals are home and hosed in La Trobe and Macarthur. The only reason McEwen is not on the list is those votes we were told about which were wrongly sent to Scullin, on which I have heard nothing further. Defence Force votes have cut Labor candidate Damian Hale’s lead over CLP member Dave Tollner in Solomon from 718 votes to 427, but he should still get up unless there’s a surprise lurking in the remaining pre-polls. The trend in Swan contains to favour Liberal candidate Steve Irons, now 136 votes in front, although there will be very little in it either way. Anyone wishing to discuss these results is encouraged to use the dedicated threads linked to in the sidebar.

A couple of other seats worth noting. The Greens camp has been talking up a possible late-count boilover in O’Connor, where Nationals candidate Philip Gardiner could theoretically overtake Labor’s Dominic Rose and surf over Liberal veteran Wilson Tuckey on preferences. At the moment Gardiner is some way behind Rose, 20.42 per cent to 18.37 per cent. It is argued that most of the 9.28 per cent vote that went to various minor candidates will go to Gardiner as preferences, although a good many went straight to Tuckey in 2004. The other question is how many of the 6.68 per cent who voted Greens followed the card and gave their second preferences to the Nationals. If the combined 15.96 per cent from minor parties delivers the Nationals 2.06 per cent more than Labor, Gardiner might be in business. In 2004 there was an 18.8 per cent minor party vote that split 7.8 per cent Labor, 5.7 per cent Nationals and 5.3 per cent, but the Greens were running split-ticket how-to-vote cards as opposed to their direct recommendation to the Nationals this time.

A late-count surprise has been a narrowing of Labor’s margin in Flynn, where postal votes have split over 70-30 in favour of the Nationals. This is because postal voting is a favoured method of voters in isolated rural areas, although the size of the gap is still a surprise. Whether or not the Nationals are still a show depends on whether there are more postals to come. Today’s Courier-Mail states that “postal votes were counted today”, which sounds like it means they were all counted, in which case the remaining 590-vote Labor lead should be enough. Pre-polls have in fact been running quite heavily in Labor’s favour, and absent votes are unlikely to buck the overall trend.

Corangamite is now on the AEC “close seats” list with pre-polls and postals having favoured the Liberals 57-43, cutting the Labor lead from 2217 to 767. However, there should be few if any remaining pre-polls and postals, and Labor did quite a lot better on the uncounted absent and provisional votes in 2004.

There has been no significant progress in Senate counting this week, but it might yet be worth keeping an eye on the Australian Capital Territory. The Liberal vote is clear of a 33.3 per cent quota on 34.1 per cent, which will need to drop at least 1.5 per cent if the Greens are to sneak through for an upset. At the 2004 election it actually increased by 0.22 per cent.

1,082 Comments

  1. 1
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:45 am | Permalink

    Thanks for all the explanations William, and it certainly makes me a bit more optimistic about a few of the close seat contests.

    It can be a bit hard telling whether all the postals have been counted in a particular seat. Should I take it that the number for ‘envelopes issued’ doesn’t necessarily mean the total number of ballots to be counted?

  2. 2
    Mark
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:50 am | Permalink

    Morning William (he who never sleeps). Interesting that Nelson is behind Turnball, I would have thought it would be the other way round.

  3. 3
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:56 am | Permalink

    Also William, what’s your opinion on Buswell? I can hardly imagine he’d be more ineffective than Omodei but I’m struggling to think of any other Liberal Party members in WA who would be strong leaders.

    That being said, there’s obviously a lack of talent on both sides of WA politics and they’d both be well cautioned to bring in some new blood at the next election.

  4. 4
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:12 am | Permalink

    Thanks heaps, William,

    Can anyone tell me where I could find the specific vote leads in for all close seats? I’ve tried the AEC and ABC.net.

    Like many here, I’d like to know how the vote count in Bennelong currently stands. Of course, it’s an academic exercise whether McKew wins it now or very soon at a By-election, but sweeter if it’s now.

  5. 5
    Spiros
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:18 am | Permalink

    Abbott has said the Liberals won’t be back the Lodge “for a while”. With him threatening to de-stabilise the new Liberal leader before he is even elected, they won’t be if Abbott has anything to do with it.

    On ya Tone.

    Should be good. If, as expected, Nelson wins (the Liberal Party’s version of Simon Crean as oppoition leader) then both Abbott and Turnbull will spend this term undermining him and each other.

    Should set Labor up in office for the next decade and a half.

    I see that Costello didn’t attend yesterday’s last supper with Howard. Costello must really loathe and detest him.

  6. 6
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Mr. Squiggle,

    “1) 1 in 4 Australians are born overseas- exactly what should they apologise for? (sorry for coming here? building a new life, surviving the civil wars I left behind?)”

    Sorry, I am a naturalized citizen born and I have no problems in saying sorry to the indigenous Australians.

  7. 7
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:28 am | Permalink

    Julie @6 Ditto for me on saying Sorry to the first Aussies.

    Just checked my bet site, but alas no Opp. Leader option to put a fiver on Nelson.

    However, they are offering “any other Party” except Labor in 2010 @ $4.50.

  8. 8
    Spiros
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:32 am | Permalink

    Sorry has different meanings. I caught up with someone recently who I hadn’t seen for a long time. She told me her husband died. I said “I’m sorry”, as you do in these situations..

    That doesn’t mean I was taking personal responsibility for his death

  9. 9
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:39 am | Permalink

    Some bloke who was at Sydney Uni. same time as Abbott was telling tales on the Blogocracy site about what a wild man he was during his years there.

    Abbott had a small mob which followed him around most lunch times as he shouted at apathetic students through his bullhorn outside the Library.

    Abbott is the Coalition’s Mark Latham and will increasingly reap a similar whirlwind for his colleagues.

  10. 10
    peter_in_nsyd
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:42 am | Permalink

    hemingway @ 4 try:
    virtual tally room:
    vtr
    bennelong> is here.

    Look at the links:
    Two Candidate Preferred By Polling Place
    Declaration Vote Scrutiny Progress
    for detailed breakdowns of postal, pre-poll counts etc.

    Thanks for the site William.

  11. 11
    peter_in_nsyd
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:49 am | Permalink

    ..sorry for not checking html more closely…not enough coffee yet…hope this is ok

    vtr
    bennelong is here.

    Look at the links:
    Two Candidate Preferred By Polling Place
    Declaration Vote Scrutiny Progress
    for detailed breakdowns of postal, pre-poll counts etc.

    Thanks for the site William.

  12. 12
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    Agree William, those odds on Nelson look extremely tempting.

  13. 13
    cityblue
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:08 am | Permalink

    The votes in McEwen that were sent to Scullin will be counting this afternoon

  14. 14
    Tabitha
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:11 am | Permalink

    Labor won the election cos they rule.
    Liberal lost the election cos they suck.

  15. 15
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:15 am | Permalink

    Re 8,

    Spiros Says:

    November 29th, 2007 at 7:32 am
    Sorry has different meanings. I caught up with someone recently who I hadn’t seen for a long time. She told me her husband died. I said “I’m sorry”, as you do in these situations..

    That doesn’t mean I was taking personal responsibility for his death

    Since the E*L*E*C*T*E*D government is going to say “sorry” in consultation with what the Aboriginals want (wording/place, etc.), you are by default taking personal responsibility like it or not. We finally have a government in place who will do what is right so I don’t mind that naysayers like you are along for the ride. You haven’t got a choice in the matter now. Cheers :)

  16. 16
    PD1981
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    I would expect Turnbull to be elected today -although the SMH reports that Nelson is gaining the support of conservatives in the party so he could benefit from this. Also Tony Jones said last night on Lateline that some Liberals are disillusioned with Turnbull’s very high profile media campaign and I imagine some of them probably won’t like him abandoning Howard’s positions on key issues and there may be a backlash against Turnbull due to both these factors and Nelson could be the beneficiary. On the other hand, Nelson’s limitless ambition and opportunism could be an off putting factor to many MPs and this may benefit Turnbull

    The Age today quoted Liberal sources as saying Abbott was only capable of mustering up 4 votes for his leadership bid. LOL. Wonder who was planning to vote for him

    This may be an interesting assessment of Howard’s legacy. If Turnbull wins, it could be viewed as somewhat of a repudiation of Howard and may also signify that there is a significant bloc of the party who disagreed with his policies but who kept their silence during his government. The downside for Turnbull is that if he does win, he’ll be relentlessly undermined by Abbott and the other Howardbots in the Liberal Party. I suspect he’ll be the next Andrew Peacock -always the bridesmaid but never the bride (in other words he’ll never be PM).

    I suspect we’ll see Abbott re-positioning himself to try and look more moderate over the next few years (not with any sincerity but similar to the way did that Howard did in 1995 when he pretended to repudiate his past positions on social policy) so that he’ll emerge as a competent leadership contender in the future. Of course if he’s ever elected, he’ll go back to being the right wing ideological zealot he always has been

  17. 17
    Marko
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:30 am | Permalink

    The AFR this morning seemed to tip the Lib leadership election decidedly in Nelson’s favor. I’m beginning to suspect that, while he can talk a good game, Turnbull simply doesn’t have the numbers. The Libs may be dazed & confused right now, but that hasn’t sent the majority of them into the self-examination needed for radical change. Nelson, to all appearances, is moderate, but I can’t imagine him as the bulldog Opposition leader that the Libs are going to need to constantly harry the Government…

    Will Malcolm get a shadow Treasury portfolio as a consolation prize?

  18. 18
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    I think Victoria or even Queensland are better chances for the Greens than the ACT. They just need lots of BTL leaking against stated party preferences, whereas the ACT would require a big and unexpected bias in postals/absentees/etc.

  19. 19
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:50 am | Permalink

    There was talk at one time of Barnett not retiring early so he could make a comeback. That’s how bad the libs are these days. This Julie Bishop as state leader thing was never going to happen before, and certainly not now. Don’t wish that on us.

  20. 20
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    The Queensland Liberal Party woes look like only getting worse with Santoro’s faction trying to get Nicholls up as Leader to give themselves another vote on State Council when Parer resigns in a couple of weeks and Flegg threatening Legal action against Parer’s attempts to break the Parliamentary Leadership deadlock.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22839805-5006786,00.html

  21. 21
    Econocrat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    Julie @15, I read Spiros as siding with you.

  22. 22
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:52 am | Permalink

    I suspect Nelson as the most moderate, and “sacrificable” without destroying the Party in the process. Abbott is the obvious one to ’sacrifice’ in the “death seat” of Opposition leader in a first term govt honeymoon, but he’d probably take most of the Party “image” down with him.

    If Turnbull is their best bet for 2010, they’ll save him for later. (Possibly others will also wait in the wings until the *heats* off and memories have faded, eg Downer) I suspect we may even see a number of Opp Leaders, for the first year or two, while others regroup, and then the *true* leadership challenge happens about 12-18 mths out from the next election.

  23. 23
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:54 am | Permalink

    For those interested in a wager just for fun on the Lib leadership, Lord Nelson is paying $9.80 at Betfair. “Kiss me, Hardy.”

  24. 24
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:57 am | Permalink

    18. Will Malcolm get a shadow Treasury portfolio as a consolation prize?

    Traditionally the deputy leader of the Liberals gets to chose their own portfolio, which has inevitably been treasury. It will be interesting to see what Bishop chooses.

  25. 25
    Marko
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:59 am | Permalink

    Dave -

    Since Malcolm is the Once and Future King of the Libs, Bishop had better choose very carefully.

    You know the rule: If you strike the King, you must kill him.

  26. 26
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Being from WA and apparently winning the deputy position based on fundraising ability, is there any chance Bishop would choose Trade or somthing along those lines? In order to to make herself more attractive to the businesses providing the fundraising?

    Possibly even Environment (to keep the miners happy)?

  27. 27
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:02 am | Permalink

    Graham Young puts the Santo camp’s ploys under the spotlight. Might I add that Joh Bjelke Petersen used a casting vote to keep himself in power about 18 months into his term when he was viewed as a hopeless performer too.

    * There is a convention in leadership ballots that the leader not use their casting vote. Bit hard to work out where they got this one from. The only time I can remember a leader being in a position of needing his casting vote was John Gorton in 1971. Gorton refused to use his casting vote, and was widely derided at the time. I don’t think it creates a precedent, but if it does, Nicholls ought to be wary, because the successful challenger was Billy McMahon, arguably Australia’s worst Prime Minister
    * The Liberal Party State Council can change the party’s constitution to give the Party President a casting vote in a tied parliamentary leadership ballot. Only state conventions can change the constitution, and there is a process that needs to be gone through first, including consultation and notice provisions. It would be a huge philosophical change for the party organisation to be able to dictate to the parliamentary wing, raising the spectre of the “bad old days” in the ALP when Arthur Calwell and Gough Whitlam had to wait outside their party’s executive for their instructions. “Never in our party” has always been the Liberals’ response to that.
    * Bruce Flegg will be unable to vote in any State Council ballot becase of his “conflict of interest”. This would indeed be a breach of precedent if Flegg was prevented from voting on this matter. If this were taken seriously, then Warwick Parer should also be excluded because he obviously has a conflict of interest too, because this is about expanding his power.

    http://ambit-gambit.nationalforum.com.au/archives/002592.html

  28. 28
    jen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    Sorry means you wish it hadn’t happened.
    Whether or not you are personally responsible.
    It is what decent and caring people say when they feel for another’s suffering or sorrow.

    This issue for me epitomises all that stinks about the Howard regime and will be the historical lens that future generations view us through, just as we look back in horror on slavery, genocide, and the invasion and destruction of other indigenous cultures around the world.
    Howard’s refusal to apologise to aboriginal people is the greatest travesty of all, as it involves our own people that he was meant to govern on behalf of. – it outweighs AWB, in my opinion.
    It shows a complete lack of humanity. And we allowed it to happen by voting this man into office 4 times..
    To those of you who still support his position, you are fast becoming relics of a dying age.

  29. 29
    Graeme
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    The Qld Libs remind me of a factionalised co-op board I once had the misfortune to sit on. (Sad to say it was a v.large organisation).

    Board of 8. Rival faction declared unannounced spill against Chairman. Claimed chairman couldn’t vote on his own position. Declared their man elected 4-3. Walked out of meeting claiming power. ‘Old’ chair had this ruse quickly overturned in court, but then to keep board alive had to try governing with his casting vote on every issue to claim a majority, as the rival faction refused to attend meetings.

    A stressful farce at the time, but in retrospect quite an amusing example of ego above entity.

  30. 30
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    You can get 9-1 on Nelson at Betfair.

  31. 31
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:06 am | Permalink

    I think that the Libs will actually have some difficulty with their shadows. Pyne’s elevation to the Ministry was done grudgingly and there isn’t much talent below him. At the same time they’ve lost quite a few front line troops, either at the ballot box or by retirement since.

  32. 32
    jen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Spiros @ 8
    I take your meaning to be in support of an apology – I think Julie may have misread you there.

  33. 33
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    It appears Spiros was echoing Howard’s long stated reason for NOT apologising to me.

    If he was suggesting an apology he chose an unfortunate set of words.

    To me, saying “sorry” is more about saying “I respect you” – at least in this context. The damage done by refusing to say sorry was significant. Even if saying sorry doesn’t actually change much, the removal of the refusal is a significant and symbolic step forward – and probably more important than the actual sorry itself.

  34. 34
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    Peter in Sydney,

    Many thanks for posting the sites on voting count, mate. ‘Onya!

  35. 35
    jen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:30 am | Permalink

    RA
    I took Spiros to mean that just because he didn’t cause her grief personally, it was no reason NOT to say sorry. Maybe I’m confused.

    Anyway, point is, it must be done.

  36. 36
    DavidS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Truss will need support

  37. 37
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Hewson is saying Costello is biding his time to become leader before the next election. If that is true, they can kiss 2010/2011 good by too, because Cossie was the master mind of WorkChoices and any linking to the past will go against them.

  38. 38
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:43 am | Permalink

    DavidS: The Nats need life support. And for Vaile to say the Nats need a generational change and for them to install an older person in as their leader is ridiculous. At least the Libs have younger people who are willing to take on the position.

  39. 39
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    The fact that the Nats don’t hold O’Connor is a clear indication that they aren’t worth mentioning in WA politics.

    Also, Carps actually appears to be trying to clean out the WA ALP – if so, more power to him! If he succeeds, the ALP will retain Government over here.

    Tabitha #14,

    Kindly leave thinking people (i.e. those who post intelligently on both sides at Pollbludger) alone, and go bother propeller.com for a while.

  40. 40
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Doe’s anyone know if Wilson Tucky is in danger on preferences in O’ Conner in WA. I heard that every party except FF put him last. Is it true?. God I hope so! William your from WA do you have any insight?

  41. 41
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    Saying sorry: In a broader sense, the Government of Australia is an entity that continues in an unbroken chain over the decades, with the baton passed from one to the other.

    It is perfectly reasonable for the Government of Australia today to apologise for the actions of an earlier incarnation of this Government.

  42. 42
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:58 am | Permalink

    Flegg to resign, with conditions
    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22841022-29277,00.html

  43. 43
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    I am astonished that Brendan Nelson is even remotely likely to win this leadership ballot. The guy is a lightweight poser – a bit of meaningless fluff. And I don’t mean to be height-ist but he just doesn’t have the physical presence to be a leader, in any event.

    Still, the party could do Turnbull a huge favour and let Nelson’s mediocrity burn brightly for a year or so.

  44. 44
    Darn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:02 am | Permalink

    Looks like Tabitha (14) has jumped ship and become an ALP supporter. Amazing what a good electoral thrashing can do.

    Still no word from the delightful Isabella though. Crawled off somewhere to lick the wounds no doubt.

  45. 45
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    Howards’ refusal was far more symbolic gesture. It allowed the bigots to wear that symbolic refusal like a Swastika as a symbol of national pride.

    I visited Canada, a couple of years ago, and did the tour of their Parliament House, and was surprised to find out their Senate composition includes 5 Senate seats appointed for life for Indigenous Canadians: 3 for First Nations representatives, and 2 for Inuit peoples.

    Their Senate is not as constitutionally powerful as ours is of course, but still I remember thinking how interesting it would be if our Indigenous peoples, ended up with “balance-of-power” seats in our Senate.

    Such a proposal in referendum I would think is much more solid, than just a few meaningless words in the Constitution Preamble. I would vote Yes with pride.

  46. 46
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    Rain – a good idea, but such a constitutional amendment would have less than a zero chance of success.

  47. 47
    cobber
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Yeah i’m surprised turnbull has gone out on a limb so early on. how many opposition leaders will the libs burn through b4 they put forward a serious one. should be good entertainment of the next 18 months or so. Question is who are the darkhorses waiting in the wings?

  48. 48
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:07 am | Permalink

    Lots of sad and sorry looking faces in Wagga – I’m lovin’ it!

    If the Nats don’t amalgamate with the Libs soon, they’ll be kaput within two elections. Warren Truss as leader will only speed up the process.

    Also on the Nats:

    Some may have read the article linked below. It’s written by Dr Troy Whitford, lecturer in politics & history at CSU Wagga. Whitford is also a director of The Page Research Centre, the National Party’s “think-tank”: how’s that for an oxymoron!

    Whitford has some good ideas on reviving the old dog, but he certainly isn’t calling for amalgamation.

    “New leader must fight Libs and ALP”:

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22822679-7583,00.html

    Whitford on the Nats: “There is an intellectual vacuum in the party that needs addressing”. You don’t need to be Einstein there, pal.

  49. 49
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Rain, if you look at the composition of the NZ parliament I think that would interest you. They have an allotted ‘M?ori electorate’ which allows for their continued participation in the parliament.

    Of course their opinion is varid over a range of policies, and I think they’re generally pretty socially conservative. Definately a very interesting system to look at.

  50. 50
    charles
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:12 am | Permalink

    PD1981 Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 8:22 am

    I suspect we’ll see Abbott re-positioning himself to try and look more moderate over the next few years (not with any sincerity but similar to the way did that Howard did in 1995 when he pretended to repudiate his past positions on social policy) so that he’ll emerge as a competent leadership contender in the future. Of course if he’s ever elected, he’ll go back to being the right wing ideological zealot he always has been

    Forget the left and right, just close your eyes and imagine Abbott as the prime minister; to be blunt, without Howard Abbott is nothing.

  51. 51
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    William: The ALP lead in Herbert has increased to 108 votes – check the aec site.
    Do we know for sure these supposed missing 3000 votes in McEwen actually exist? Labor would need just about every one of them to overturn Fran Bailey’s lead: not at all likely!
    Prediction about Turnball I heard from a spin doctor on ABC Radio this morning: he will win the Liberal leadership AND self destruct in 12 months. Tony Abbott waits to pounce LOL

  52. 52
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:27 am | Permalink

    In small rural booths where there was no Green htv.s given out the evidence is that their preferences go all over the place (same for Families First). Tuckey looks secure. I hope Flynn does not turn out to be a replay of Hinkler in 2001 which was very disappointing.

  53. 53
    Petrie is Coming Home
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    The QLD Libs are an absolute laughing stock.

    Tim Nicholls is just a puppet for Santo Santoro and Bill O’Chee. He can’t even convice 4 of his colleagues that he is a worthy leader.

  54. 54
    Martin B
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Might I add that Joh Bjelke Petersen used a casting vote to keep himself in power about 18 months into his term when he was viewed as a hopeless performer too.

    And two proxies pulled out of his back pocket, IIRC.

    Um, not that I was there ore anything...

  55. 55
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    Will Rudd take on the foreign affairs portfolio? McMullan has been mentioned; McClelland is a bit on the nose.

    Rudd would do a good job cleaning up the mess left by his old sparring partner, Dolly the Sad Panda.

  56. 56
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Has a PM ever done Foreign as well? Interesting thought but far too much foreign travel, surely, when his stated No1 priority is “working families” ..

    Bob McMullan for Foreign.

  57. 57
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    ABC Radio says Bob Debus and John Faulkner will be promoted, Laurie Ferguson dropped, Combet/Shorten/Maxine become parliamentary secretaries: rumours as yet, nothing official.

  58. 58
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Fagin: I certainly hope not. Sure Rudd would be good in it, but he has a lot on his plate. The work of the PM is far more demanding than Leader of the Opposition. News Ltd has an article with Crean being quiet about the prospect of taking on the FA role. Time will tell, but Rudd can’t take on the role.

  59. 59
    L.Duce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    The new and progressive direction that Turnbull has layed out for his party of right wing reactionaries should include a name change. The Hedgehog Party is my suggestion.

  60. 60
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    The Prime Minister’s job is surely too big these days to take on another portfolio, let along one as time consuming as Foreign Affairs.

    I’m hoping for Bob McMullan as well – maybe John Faulkner as an alternative.

  61. 61
    misanthrope
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:52 am | Permalink

    Don’t FA ministers spend a very large amount of time OS?

  62. 62
    Petrie is Coming Home
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Interesting that Costello and Downer missed the farewell barbie yesterday. Lets hope that Costello was busy putting the finishing touches on “The Costello Diaries” … in store for Christmas !

    Does anyone know the record number for women ministers ?. You would have to think that Gillard, Wong, Roxon, Macklin, Lundy, McLucas & Plibersek will give that a nudge.

  63. 63
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    If Fergie’s gone, that’s a step in the right direction. Jenny George is far more deserving for an ex-ACTU Prez, and she’s never had a real shot.

    Also, just having a few high profile inner cabinet women is not good enough. Keating’s right that Labor’s women have got the right stuff. (I know, I know…..Reba Meagher…..ugh!)

  64. 64
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    Faulkner is such a powerhouse. Even in a opposition he made bureaucrats squirm during Senate estimates.

  65. 65
    Lord D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:56 am | Permalink

    What’s happened in Flynn is similar to Maranoa, another big seat with a lot of solid Nats rurals. In Maranoa, the Nats got 62% of ordinary votes, but 79% of postals.

  66. 66
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    Johnny was perfectly happy when the Japanese government apologised for something that happened 60+ years ago (under a different regime), but when it came to doing the same for the Aboriginals he was entirely hypocritical. Good riddance rodent.

  67. 67
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Landeryou says that Faulker will get defence and that McClelland will keep Foreign Affairs. Crean would then presumably be left with trade. I don’t know how Landeryou knows these things, but he frequently does.

  68. 68
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    I reckon the aec stats per seat are interesting but useless to work out winners as we do not know how many (if any) postal & pre poll votes are left to count per seat

    because there is no pre polled total number of votes cast per seat or no postal total number of votes cast per seat…is it possible to assess how/who will win any of these close seats ?

  69. 69
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:09 am | Permalink

    I reckon Cossie will work out, as the legacy gets pissed on daily by his own team, that any comeback plans arent worth bothering with.

  70. 70
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    No Ron Brown, we won’t know for sure until all the votes are counted. I’d say Labor is a good chance in at least 2-3 of the close seats.

  71. 71
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    No Costello can’t come back from here. It’s the end for him. If people didn’t think he was gutless before… they will now.

  72. 72
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:12 am | Permalink

    Seems if the reports are correct Rudd has opted to minimise noses out of joint with a promise of promotion to the real ministry for newcomers, wise move in terms of internal party harmony.

  73. 73
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Only 20 votes in it in Bowman! ALP ahead.

  74. 74
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Ron Brown @ 68

    I share your frustration, Ron.

    Perhaps only the party scrutineers are to be able to say what’s really happening?

  75. 75
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Never say Never LTEP, there was no-one more reviled in the late 20’s and early 30’s in Britain within the Conservative Party then Winston Churchill and look how that turned out.

  76. 76
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    For frustration, see senate.

    At least they’re counting HoR.

  77. 77
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    So all Costello needs is for Angela Merkel to annex the Sudentenland and he’s back in business.

  78. 78
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    ESJ #75,

    True, but remember that Stanley Bruce barely shoed his face around UAP conferences through the 1930s….

  79. 79
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    re postal & pre poll total votes in play – thanks re its in “declaration vote scrutiny
    progress”

  80. 80
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    Re: Costello’s lack of courage.

    Dr. John Hewson finally ended the “gentle” metaphors about ticker, guts or whatever. He said Costello didn’t have the balls. Good call, Doc.

  81. 81
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    You’d think I could spell S u d e t e n l a n d by now.

    I think Labor will win Corangamite, Solomon, Flynn, Herbert and Bowman but lose Swan and Dickson. I think that makes 85.

  82. 82
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:18 am | Permalink

    Channel 10 news says ministry announced–i’ll switch to skynews.

  83. 83
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    Rudd on Sky Online Live now

  84. 84
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    ” I think that makes 85.”

    As a PB regular, Im shocked to discover Adam is more optimistic than LTEP ;)

    Tend to agree. 85 was my pick, so here’s hoping. Whats the prize again? :)

  85. 85
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Well I did say ‘at least 2-3′. I feel more confident today, with reports that most of the postals counting has been done.

    Nico, do you have a link the the Sky feed?

  86. 86
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Bookies do NOT make a mistake as large as 6 to 1 odds Nelson in a 2 HUMAN race
    Clearly turnbull must have it tied up

    thought Nelson would be easier to Labor to beat in 2010 seeing the Labor margin will be only about 1.5% ?

  87. 87
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Colbran pulling ahead in Herbert as we speak.

  88. 88
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    Ch 10 news was a squib.

    All they know is that new cab members are Faulkner, Eliot, O’Connor and K.Ellis

    Out are Lundy, McLucas, Fergusen, and O’Brien

  89. 89
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Cabinet Portfolios will not be announced until after meeting this arvo

  90. 90
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    That isnt cabinet, thats the ministry.

    no way that Ellis, O’Connor and Eliot will be in Cabinet!!

  91. 91
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Verbal #90,

    Why not? Ellis in Adelaide has been a very effective Labor presence there – lifted their vote handsomely. The others I don’t know that well, but they are probably of the same calibre as her.

  92. 92
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Flash @46, LTEP et al

    Such Consitutional amendments for ATSI power would have zero chance, but was interesting pie-in-the-sky ideal to ponder.

    The main difference with the other C’wlth countries with Upper Houses on the Westminster system, is that for some reason Australia’s was set up to have much more *real* power. Greatly irritated successive govts on both sides of the political divide ever since. And Aussies refuse to change it, being historically reluctant to *change* anything.

    Gives Australia another unique-in-the-world feature, along with compulsory and preferential voting – a powerful Senate.

    In theory, a great idea of checks-and-balances. In practice, its been a royal pain-in-the-proverbial!

    Now we have someone like Nick X — its just such a typical quintessential Aussie sense-of-humour joke, that I burst out laughing when I saw the probable Senate results :) I suppose in worst-case-scenario, I could live with the concession of banning pokies nationwide in return for other important things, but I couldn’t stop laughing anyway!! *chuckle* and I guess being positive, a big improvement on Harradine! But South Ozzies? Just one question – *why?*

  93. 93
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    Faulkner will be in Cabinet, the other three in outer portfolios. All good choices. I’m sorry for Laurie, he’s a fine bloke, and shares my enthusiasm for obscure election statistics, but not ministerial talent in the current company.

  94. 94
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    guess ALL Labor supporters are lucky there ARE 80 seats in the bag guaranteeing a Labor win with 9 doubtful !!

    instead of 75 in the bag & 14 doubtful

    I reckon this is THE BRIGHT SIDE

  95. 95
    Petrie is Coming Home
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    I will be shattered if O’Brien is out. I was so looking forward to Kerry O’Brien interviewing Kerry O’Brien.

  96. 96
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    Why not? Ellis in Adelaide has been a very effective Labor presence there – lifted their vote handsomely. The others I don’t know that well, but they are probably of the same calibre as her.

    She’s only been in for one term, is very young, and has zero life experience outside of student politics and federal politics. Plus her high profile surely has a lot to do with being an attractive young woman. Those are some good reasons.

    I’m not saying she doesn’t have ability, but why shouldn’t she have to do the hard yards like everyone else?

  97. 97
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    because the 4 that have gone out were all sub-cabinet ministers, and I doubt (though I am happy to be wrong) that there will be room in the major portfolios for those people, especially given that most of the major portfolios are already, really, in the bag.

    Don’t get me wrong, I agree that Ellis has lots of talent and would be a great asset in Cabinet, but I just don’t think that its happened just yet.

    Anyway, I was just clarifiying that we really only know about the Ministry at this point, not the cabinet (to my knowledge anyway). Lots of people use the terms interchangably, and they aren’t!

  98. 98
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    How come Arch Bevis survived?

  99. 99
    Lord D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    Rain, the US system also gives the Senate a great deal of power – arguably, the Senate has more power there than the HoR, as the US Senate approves presidential appointments and treaties.

  100. 100
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    I didn’t even know who Kate Ellis was before visiting this site. She probably has as much experience as Peter Garrett in a parliamentary/political context.

    Faulkner is a no-brainer, as is Wong.

  101. 101
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Flash @ 56 Gough Whitlam was both PM and Foreign Affairs minister.

  102. 102
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    LTEP, if you think Faulkner and Wong are “no brainers” then you are an even bigger fool than I already thought. They are two of the smartest people you will ever meet. (Or in your case, not meet).

  103. 103
    Boll
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    #102 I took LTEP to mean they were assured of spots. If not, I’m with Adam.

  104. 104
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Adam, I mean ‘no-brainers’ as in there’s no doubt they should be in the Ministry. I have briefly met both.

  105. 105
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Adam: I think LTEP was meaning its a no brainer for them to get promoted, not that they have no brains.

  106. 106
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    If the Libs choose Brendan Nelson over Malcolm Turnbull their ratings will drop by several points. Not the least of his problems is that he is so dour. Hde has nothing like the charisma of Malcolm. He will only be a stop gap until Malcolm steps in those shoes a year or so down he track. Malcolm however will be a breath of fresh air and exactly what the Liberal part needs for renewal. He will be a formidable Opposition leader and keep Kevin on his toes. I wouldn’t be surprised to see Coalition ratings remain the same of even rise if Malcolm gets the job. He really is the only possibility.
    I see Antony is now predicting 85-63-2 which is exactly what I predicted for weeks prior to the election(except I allowed for the possibility of an additional independent, reducing the Coalition to 62) plus the 53-47. If you are in politics long enough, you get to read these things.
    Here’s another prediction:- if Malcolm gets the job he will give Kevin a hell of a run for his money at the next election.

  107. 107
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Adam, I beleive LTEP thought that the decisions to include them were so clear and so compelling that the decision was a “no-brainer”.

    The decision to include them, not the people themselves.

  108. 108
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Adam, “no brainers” means that LTEP agrees with you !

  109. 109
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    I think it was in the sense that they were obvious candidates for promotion, Adam.

  110. 110
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Penny Wong is sensational and I look forward to having her represent South Australia in the Rudd Labor government.

  111. 111
    Martin B
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    “If Fergie’s gone, that’s a step in the right direction. Jenny George is far more deserving for an ex-ACTU Prez, and she’s never had a real shot. ”

    The Ferguson that is out is L, not M.

  112. 112
    misanthrope
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    He means their going to get in ie”no brainers”

    its not only obvious thats what he meant it’s a “no brainer” ;-)

  113. 113
    Boll
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    6 people and counting who don’t think LTEP can explain/stand up for him/herself. I was first though.lol

  114. 114
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    OK, I retract my comment. LTEP reverts to being merely the fool I thought he/she was before, not a higher grade of fool.

    Arch Bevis, Kate Lundy, Kerry O’Brien, Jan McLucas, Laurie Ferguson, Bob McMullin are OUT.

  115. 115
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    A fun game for those playing at home – match your fave ALP MPs with their new Ministries!

    Cabinet Ministers

    Prime Minister
    Treasurer
    Minister for Transport and Regional Services
    Minister for Foreign Affairs
    Minister for Trade
    Minister for Finance and Administration
    Minister for Health and Ageing
    Attorney-General
    Minister for Defence
    Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources
    Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
    Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
    Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
    Minister for Education, Science and Training
    Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations
    Minister for the Environment and Water Resources
    Minister for Human Services

    Outer Ministers

    Minister for Local Government, Territories and Roads
    Minister for Revenue and Assistant Treasurer
    Special Minister of State
    Minister for Ageing
    Minister for Justice and Customs
    Minister for Communications, Information Technology and the Arts
    Minister for the Arts and Sport
    Minister for Veterans’ Affairs
    Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence
    Minister for Small Business and Tourism
    Assistant Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
    Minister for Fisheries, Forestry and Conservation
    Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Indigenous Affairs
    Minister for Community Services
    Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for Women’s Issues
    Minister for Vocational and Further Education
    Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service
    Minister for Workforce Participation
    Assistant Minister for the Environment and Water Resources

  116. 116
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    Bevis did get the bullet according to ABC.

  117. 117
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    Adam @ 114

    Not a good day for the ALP in Canberra then!

  118. 118
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    I was around yesterday and came back after a meeting to find that something I had written circa 50 comments above had been misinterpreted…..

  119. 119
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    Does anybody have the full list of names?

  120. 120
    Boll
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    LTEP, what have done to Adam to make him so narky, by the way. (”Or in your case, not meet.”) – Just a little petty there perhaps Adam?

  121. 121
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    Adam, I shall cry myself to sleep tonight knowing I don’t have your approval.

  122. 122
    neophyte
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Penny Wong for FA

  123. 123
    neophyte
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    Penny Wong for FA, I hope.

  124. 124
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Could Rudd afford to have a Senator out of the coutnry for long periods? WOuld make the votes kinda tough.

    Had the tradition of pairing been re-instated yet?

  125. 125
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    FA = Finance and Administration or Foreign Affairs?

  126. 126
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Penny Wong 4 defence

  127. 127
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    There seems to have been some surprise about the extent to which postals have favoured the Conservatives. I’m confused – can I ask you pseph experts a few questions?

    Have the postals been more favourable in this election than previously?

    If “no” how come the seat estimates keep getting revised down – wouldn’t the predicitive models factor in the known postal bias?

    If “yes” then how come?

    Did the Libs put a huge amount of effort into getting people to go postal or is there something fishy here?

  128. 128
    bryce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Sorry will be forthcoming from Rudd and Turnbull. Many others will support this sentiment and guess what? The sky won’t fall in.
    Sorry, as an issue was, and is 100% Howard.

    Howard’s non-Sorry for the Stolen Generation goes much more deeply than just this issue. There are countless occurrences of this reactionary behaviour throughout his entire public career.
    It’s tied up in his inability to ever accept a Progressive or Left point of view as having merit. His knee-jerk reaction is to oppose the Left then tries to defend his position. Opposing arguments are of no consequence to him. He puts on his tin ear to opposition but proudly and defiantly uses semantics and rhetoric to appeal to, and stimulate, the ugly and base in too many of us.
    The Stolen Generation, torture, the unemployed, ethnic mutual respect (racial tolerance), single mums, the rewriting of history, asylum seekers, climate change (he didn’t believe it for a minute), the homeless… it’s a long list.

    To be fair, I can recall that he buckled early in his PMship. And then it wasn’t a buckle. Tens of thousands of refugees fleeing “ethnic cleansing” were offered temporary asylum in Australia. If you remember, JH opposed this vehemently and passionately for quite a while, but it was the constant press coverage of our “appalling national lack of sympathy” (and a quiet word from his media advisors!) that caused this huge reversal. He then announced, with much fanfare, “Operation Safe Haven”. And was completely unashamed! Gobsmacking!
    This was probably the last time it happened. He became more sure of himself as the years went by and made an artform of the dog whistle.

    But just enough Australians have just woken up.

  129. 129
    cityblue
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:48 am | Permalink

    Wong for Climate Change apparently

  130. 130
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Martin B @111
    Thanks for that correction, although I’m disappointed.

  131. 131
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Albert F, I think the postals are running slightly lower than they did for the Libs at the past election (very slightly).

    However, there’s a lot more of them so they make a bigger impact.

  132. 132
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    LTEP, Adam, enough. Try to leave the personal baggage at home, people.

    Regarding the ministries, here’s a few picks of mine:

    1. Treasury – Swan will keep it.
    2. Foreign Affairs – Given the spectacular job Penny Wong did during the election campaign, I’ll take a punt and call FA for her.
    3. Minister for Health – Nicola Roxon’s not going anywhere anytime soon.
    4. Minister for the Environment – Garrett won’t keep it after his stuffups during the campaign. I think that he’ll get Arts and Culture instead (A&C to be hived off from Communications). Not sure who will go to Environment, though.

  133. 133
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    Flash @ 56 Gough Whitlam was both PM and Foreign Affairs minister.

    …and Treasurer, AG, Customs, Trade, Works, Education and a bucketload more. That was just nuts. Is it any wonder it eventually ended in tears?

  134. 134
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    http://www.alp.org.au/people/index.php?task=ps&type=shadows&state=&keywords=

    that is a list of the shadows.

    IMO, Tanner has FA, Wong is my tip for FACSIA

  135. 135
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Skynews banner says Debus is IN.

  136. 136
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Warren Snowden for a junior ministry, Sky says. Prepare to bored rigid. He is known around Aboriginal communities in the NT as “the white rabbit” in that he just sort of pops his head up here, there and everywhere, looking slightly bewildered, and doing little else of note.

  137. 137
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    I suspect Plibersek will get FACSIA.

  138. 138
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Can anyone explain Justine Elliot? I don’t get it… I didn’t realise she was a particularly strong performer.

  139. 139
    Matt D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    Tanner will keep Finance. Do a good job too.

  140. 140
    dovif
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    damn it, Ruddie is already costing me money…. the share market is under performing the other major market by 3% this week already ….

    Plibersek is definitely geting a facial

  141. 141
    Lord D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    Albert F, the ABC computer predicted Labor would win 86 seats on election night, even though Labor were ahead at the time in 89. Some of us got carried away with election night results; postals always favour the Tories. It’s still disappointing to see Labor leads turned around by postals, but that’s life.

  142. 142
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    Mathew – I suspect Garrett will keep the enviroment – he was an liability during the election – but is not so vunerable now the ALP is in govt.

  143. 143
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Warren Snowdon and Justine Elliot have come from the clouds. I don’t know why you’d put Snowdon in unless he’s to be Minister for Indigenous Affairs – and I don’t know that even that is a good idea.

    Elliot must have some sort of regional-based portfolio.

    Kate Ellis on the front bench. *Sighs contentedly*

  144. 144
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    I’ve missed your posts Dovif.

    There is still time to get “postals” in – as long as its date stamped before 24 November you can get them in by 7 December. Just need a franking machine really.

  145. 145
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Peter Garrett has interesting plans for Arts, including a droit de suite for Aboriginal art. That is when an Aboriginal painting sells a proportion goes to the artist or the artist’s family. He should get Aboriginal Affairs and Arts. Bob Debus might get Environment. He’s very familiar with it, failing that Attorney General. I doubt if Penny Wong, of the Left, no matter how fabulous she is, will get Foreign Affairs.

  146. 146
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    Albert F #142,

    In that case, I certainly hope he wises-up in a hurry. He was a frontman, after all – you’d think that he knew how to handle the press by now…. (mutter grumble).

  147. 147
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    FACSIA is apparently set to be broken up. Plibersek to get Family and Community Services, possibly Garrett to get Indigenous Affairs.

    Macklin to go back to Education, now that Smith appears to have been promoted?

  148. 148
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    dovif, hang in there in the markets. There’s some superb buying right now.
    AIM,CRK,IMP,GRK etc etc

  149. 149
    verbal
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    Prime Minister – Rudd
    Treasurer – Swan
    Minister for Transport and Regional Services – M. Ferguson
    Minister for Foreign Affairs – Crean
    Minister for Trade – McClelland
    Minister for Finance and Administration – Tanner
    Minister for Health and Ageing – Roxon
    Attorney-General – Debus
    Minister for Defence – Fitzgibbon
    Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources – Evans
    Minister for Immigration and Citizenship – Burke
    Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Elliot
    Minister for Families, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs – Plibisek Minister for Education, Science and Training – Smith
    Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations – Gillard
    Minister for the Environment and Water Resources – Albanese
    Minister for Human Services – Macklin

    Thats my cabinet list, but its wrong, because Wong isnt in it, I just don’t know who they will bump to fit her in. Mackiln is the obvious choice, but they won’t give her DHS, wo where would they put her… interesting, I wait with baited breath!

  150. 150
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    AAP reporting McMullan has been dropped? Surely, surely not.

  151. 151
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Interestingly, now Broadbent is recording a swing to him in McMillan.

  152. 152
    Nayto
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Rain @ 92 re:Mr XBut South Ozzies? Just one question – *why?*
    Quite easy: X is the quintessential non-politician. Yes: he has stunts; but he is way more than a single issue poli.

    As well as no-pokies he is big on states rights [the workchoices high court decision was the reason that he decided to switch to fed. politics] and water resources.

    The fact that SA is at the end of the Murray Darling sewer and that the major parties did not focus on this during the campaign was a reason that he got many votes.

  153. 153
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Debus would be a good Foreign Minister actually. He is very urbane and mixes easily with all sorts. Not sure if Kevin Rudd wants to give it to someone on the Left though. Anthony Albanese will certainly want Environment but may not get it.

  154. 154
    dovif
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    EdwardStJohn

    Ashame to admit it, voted with Ruddie, Coward’s use by date was the 90s he just did not know it

  155. 155
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Verbal #149,

    Good god, that waffler Crean as FA Minister? Shoot me now, please. I’m thinking that given the importance of education in Rudd’s election platform, Science and Training will be rolled into it, all under Stephen Smith.

  156. 156
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:05 pm | Permalink

    Dario@133. Gough only ever took on Foreign Affairs when he was PM, with the exception of the first 2 weeks when so much legislation was produced. That initial period is often called the Duumvirate – Whitlam and Barnard – though Gough tells me it was really a Trumvirate because “The Governor-General was sitting at the end of the table signing it all”.

  157. 157
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    No, Whitlam was FM as well as PM well into 1973, not just during the duumvirate.

  158. 158
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Neilbris, I felt too that Kevin Rudd would be by far the best for Foreign Minister if he can combine the two jobs.

  159. 159
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Whitlam and Barnard were Ministers for Everything during that amazing period.

  160. 160
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Whitlam was FM until November 1973.

  161. 161
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    ABC also reporting McMullan is out. Sorry to see that.

  162. 162
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    ABC says Garrett has environment, but Penny Wong has Climate Change.

  163. 163
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    So maybe the Latham diaries about McMullan being a notorious leaker are right?
    Maybe he leaked to the wrong person about Dear Leader?

  164. 164
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    ABC says Faulkner Special Min. of State

  165. 165
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:10 pm | Permalink

    The ABC will be streaming both the ministry announcement and the Liberal leadership announcement at their website.

    Yes I’m sorry to see McMullan out too. The others were duds. All the newcomers are good value.

  166. 166
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Dovif,

    As a friend of mine said, he made a lot of money under Howard has cashed it in and is now waiting for the good buying opportunities after a year or two of Labor to make more money.

    Stayed too long? Unfortunately to have the ego to want it in the first place you probably find it hard to believe its time to go. I dont think history will show its a sin peculiar to Howard only.

  167. 167
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    Ed St. J
    If what you say is true about McMullan, fair enough. But still a loss of competence and experience.

  168. 168
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Adam, read my post again – I said “Gough only ever took on Foreign Affairs when he was PM, with the exception of the first 2 weeks”. The critical words are “with the exception”. During the first 2 weeks Gough and his Deputy were ministers for everything. Beyond that he only kept Foreign Affairs.

  169. 169
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Edward, your friend is what’s commonly known as a sore loser. That’s what all the sore losers are saying.

  170. 170
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    163 [So maybe the Latham diaries about McMullan being a notorious leaker are right?
    Maybe he leaked to the wrong person about Dear Leader?]

    Don’t get too excited ESJ, it’s more likely McMullan will be the Leader of the House and flog the Libs tactically in the parliament.

  171. 171
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    McMullan would also make an excellent Speaker, but I imagine Jenkins or Price will get it. (Landeryou says Jenkins)

  172. 172
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Who will be Speaker? Rudd promised independence in that role.

  173. 173
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    They all promise independence… independence can be construed any way you wish. I’m sure the Libs will say Hawker was a fine and independent speaker.

  174. 174
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:17 pm | Permalink

    Hemmingway

    “ABC says Garrett has environment, but Penny Wong has Climate Change.”

    mmm – neat trick – Garrett’s election efforts get him demoted without changing portfolios.

  175. 175
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    The Australian is reporting Smith for Foreign Affairs

  176. 176
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Amazing that Peter Garrett has indeed got Environment. That’s a heck of a vote of confidence from Kevin Rudd. All is forgiven evidently. I’m actually very pleased about that. We are in for very interesting times.

  177. 177
    Bring Back CL's blog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Gough was both PM and FA in his first ministry.
    He later made Don willisee FA but was in essence still FA which showed he couls stuff both being PM and FA

  178. 178
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    I am not making any aspersions about McMullan other than reporting what Latham said in the diaries about him. Presumably if Rudd wanted to have saved him he could have.

    Steve I thought being leader of the house means you have to be a minister?

    LTEP – Well we will see about a recession, I dont want to be BIS Shrapnel but we are statistically overdue.

    Now that the schadenfreude is done, must be tough for those who missed out on a personal level. 12 years of chasing the prize and then to be denied by your own at the cusp of victory. I think Rudd is lucky he has a reasonable margin. Note how Howard even gave Wilson Tuckey a go – disaffected people can cause so much trouble.

  179. 179
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    I’ve worked closely with Penny Wong through some quite difficult issues and she is extremely capable and keeps her cool throughout. She will be highly competent on climate change and will surprise many people.

  180. 180
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    Dud ministers cause even more trouble.
    Smith for FA would be a very good move.
    Why is everyone so down on Garrett? His only fault was to make a joke to a media snake.

  181. 181
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    I think we’re seeing that Rudd was serious when he said “I will decide”.

    He’s more a President than a PM so far.

  182. 182
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    ABC says Smith has Foreign Affairs too.

  183. 183
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    178 [Steve I thought being leader of the house means you have to be a minister?]

    I can’t recall anything that would give me that impression. Just because the tories operate that way does not mean that other combinations are not possible or better.

  184. 184
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Adam @180 I agree re the Garret attacks being uncalled for. They do, however, highlight his relative inexperience. Environment would also be a risk in light of his past/lyrics.

    However, if a ministry for Climate Change is created, this would help offset (pun intended) the foregoing.

  185. 185
    dovif
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Ed St J yours is a smart friend … Howard won’t be the last I agree … it was a good govenment, it made decision … and it lost its way the last years under Howard

    Lose the election …. His friend’s view is supported by history … the australian govenment cycle is Liberal in government, times are good. Since time are good, we get Labor in Govenment so they can make us feel good. We tell them to look after the environment, to spend money on everything. Soon inflation is up, people are defaulting on their home, people are unemployed and we get the Liberals back to get them to look after the Economy …. the govenment do what we tell them to do, not either party’s fault …. maybe Rudd will be different, like he say, he sure sound and have the background of a Liberal

  186. 186
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Gillard for Education AND IR?

  187. 187
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    Adam,
    The feckless joke was only the half of it. Ironically, it’s probably Abbott that saved Garrett by outgaffing him.

  188. 188
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Dovif… times were good under Howard as Treasurer? Is that what you’re saying?

  189. 189
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Supposedly Snowden has got a ministry gig, along with Justine Elliot, Debus and Kate Ellis.

    I’m surprised Smith is out of education – would they switch McLelland to there, with Smith taking FA. And what is going to happen with Fitzgibbon – surely they’ll move him out of defence…

  190. 190
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    Hemingway, what was the other half?

  191. 191
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    You can always put duds in pretend ministries and then let them go after a term.

  192. 192
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Dovif, I think you need to remember also that mortgage default’s are at record highs.

  193. 193
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Garrett has not been saved, as Albert F noted. He’s got Environment but without the key area of Climate Change so he’s left explaining why, against his better judgment, the Tassie pulp mill is going ahead. He gets to talk about whales too.

    This is a significant demotion. Climate Change will garner more headlines than any other single issue in the next couple of years.

  194. 194
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    ESJ,

    I would assume Kelly would get Veterans Affairs reasonably soon, with Combet, Shorten and McKew also in line to get decent ministries.

  195. 195
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    191 [You can always put duds in pretend ministries and then let them go after a term.]

    Like Mal Brough you mean?

  196. 196
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Richard Jones,

    Good call on Penny Wong. She ran many hard yards in the campaign, especially on Skynews. Is yours a nom de plume, or are you THE Richard Jones Balmain/Leichhardt?

  197. 197
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    Adam

    I agree on Garrett. It was one slip, widely reported. But even sans Climate Change, environment will still give him some meaty issues to deal with, including the Gunns Pulp Mill.

  198. 198
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Well steve, I think Howard did quite a good job of cycling people through ministries like

    Jim Lloyd
    Dana Vaile
    Jackie Kelly
    Wilson Tuckey

    etc etc

    Both parties have large proportions of smoking duds so you have to buy them off and hope they dont do too much damage. Its seems they all like to ride around in the limos and do the trips?

  199. 199
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Dropping McMullan is bloody madness – the only sense i can make of it is if he becomes Speaker.
    The man is a walking, talking book of standing orders – would bring some integrity back to the chair.

  200. 200
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    I’m surprised Garrett didn’t get shifted to Indigenous Affairs. Unless they’ve given that to Snowden…

  201. 201
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Any word on what Bob Debus got?

  202. 202
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Adam,

    A few days before Abbott’s day of Apologies, Garrett had wrongly stated Labor’s position regarding developing countries for the upcoming future Kyoto Mach II negotiations. Rudd immediately corrected him, but it was not a good look.

    Garrett often looked out of his element, although did better than expected in the Debate with Turnbull.

  203. 203
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Swing Lowe-

    Kelly in Veterans Affairs, wasted.

    Its a declining area – WW2 vets and widows falling off the perch rapidly. Nice photo ops and cups of tea though.

  204. 204
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    any news on the Libs leadership?

  205. 205
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    ESJ (#203)- that is a moron’s statement. If you knew anything about the portfolio, you wouldn’t talk such rubbish.

  206. 206
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Hemingway 187

    Yes Tony Abbott, the gift that keeps on giving LOL.

    I only caught up on the full text of his leadership comments on LateLine last night when I read the SMH this morning. An indication of future leadership challenges – just wonderful. So now Labor can accurately point out that the Liberals are both sticking to their unpopular old policies, and internally divided. I dub him the new Shadow Minister for Remaining in Opposition.

  207. 207
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    ESJ,

    Kelly in VA would be an initial step. I’d expect he’d end up in Defence ultimately, but he’ll probably have to jump through a few hoops to get there.

  208. 208
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    198 The difference is ESJ that Labor intends achieving something while in power and not squandering time as your list of ministers was want to do. Leaving Ferguson out is a good move at this stage.

  209. 209
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Dovif, I’d suggest your reading of history is flawed. Historically the ALP is elected when the economy needs fixing and/or people are feeling insecure. They trust Labor to provide a safety net and some compassion in these times. Once the economy is humming again they tend to elect Conservatives in the hope of maximising their financial returns. Labor tends to be the economic and social fixer.

  210. 210
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    ESJ #178,

    You have noted that we are overdue for a recession. Does this mean that you won’t blame Labor if it happens within, say, the next 24 months?

    Generally,

    I wonder why Smith would be given Foreign Affairs? He seemed well-placed in Education, handing Bishop her backside every time they met.

  211. 211
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Btw, I want to go on the record to congratulate Russell Broadbent on getting a swing towards him in McMillan. It shows what can happen if you’re willing to stick to your core beliefs, even if they contradict with the party’s official position…

  212. 212
    Bring Back CL's blog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    No Kelly is the perfect person for FA in future

  213. 213
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    204 [any news on the Libs leadership?]

    Yes Glen running around like chooks with their heads cut off as usual.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/29/2104874.htm

  214. 214
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    Rudd News Conference at 1pm

  215. 215
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Optimist, I think you will find the demographic realities are undeniable when it comes to Vets Affairs.

  216. 216
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    So when will Mal or Bren come out 1:30 or beforehand?

  217. 217
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    Robert McClelland is Attorney-General (surely a placeholder for Dreyfus). Stephen Smith in Foreign Affairs.

  218. 218
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    McLelland to be A-G. So what does Debus get then?

  219. 219
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Mathew Cole -

    Yes, Australian governments influence outcomes at the margins, we are just too small otherwise to cause recessions except in exceptional cases. But if there is a recession Labor will wear it because it happened on their watch, not fair but true.

  220. 220
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Stephen Smith LOL we go from Alexander Downer to Smith HAHAHAH!

    Who’s got Education?

  221. 221
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    No wonder they chose Smith because Rudd will do all the work for him LOL!

  222. 222
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Gillard has IR and education

  223. 223
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    Gillard has Education and IR according to the Herald Sun website.

  224. 224
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    McMullan is now Parliamentary Secretary

  225. 225
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    Nelson supposedly Liberal leader

  226. 226
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:41 pm | Permalink

    The ONLY way to have a reasonably independent speaker is to make it a public service or statutory position

    Whilst the appointment may be pro the Government in power , I suspect it may be
    more independent than a Government MP

    The other disgrace of the ‘Reps’ is question time :
    opposition questions do not get answered
    government questions do get answered as they’re “Dorothy Dixers”

    (or in respect to Downer are they ” Dolly Dixers”)

  227. 227
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    All will be revealed at the press conference. It’s all speculation till then. I feel sorry for McMullen though….and Bevis is my local member and a decent bloke – though perhaps it’s difficult to justify so many Brisbane members on the front bench. I’d have thought Bevis was superior than Snowden though. Rudd must want NT to have representation. He’s spreading the love around!

  228. 228
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Link in the Oz regarding Lib leadership:

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22839806-601,00.html

  229. 229
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Nelson 45-42 Sweeeeeet :-P

  230. 230
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Soc @ 206,

    Yeah, I read the Lateline Abbott interview transcript at abc.net, and you’re spot on. Tony went a quite a lo softer on him because he was willing to show up on such a “hard” day.

    Given the total rejection he’s copped, I’d surmise that a mid-life crisis looms large in Abbott’s future.

  231. 231
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    ESJ #219,

    Fair point. People still seem to forget that the Western world was in recession in 1989, not just Australia. Damn Paul Keating and his big mouth.

  232. 232
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    what about deputy?

  233. 233
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Nelson in as sacrifical lamb :) Rudd to do a press conference at 1 pm AEST on his new Ministry

    Thanks Nayto, for the extra info on Nick X

  234. 234
    Misty
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Woot, I just won $200 if Nelson was voted leader.

  235. 235
    Bring Back CL's blog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    bob Debus was a rather ordinary minister in a very orddinary to very bad State government in NSW.

    Why has he a m inistry.

    Kelly, Shortern and Combet have better credentials

  236. 236
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    225 [Nelson supposedly Liberal leader]

    You mean a former union boss who was an ALP member. It won’t get better if that was true.

  237. 237
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Young now up by 60 in Bowman, Dutton up by 200 in Dickson.

  238. 238
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    Ron Brown #226,

    The other way to get a non-partisan Speaker would be to appoint Katter or Windsor as the Speaker.

  239. 239
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    “Swing Lowe Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 12:32 pm
    I’m surprised Garrett didn’t get shifted to Indigenous Affairs.”

    I think Minister for the enviroment could go under the alternative title of “Minister that has to talk to Bob Brown”. In that sense, Garrett is well placed and now has had his wings clipped by having climate change removed.

    He is not such a liability now, as the scare tactics he was subject to don’t work once the election is won.

  240. 240
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    SL: That means Dutton has dropped back since this morning in Dickson

  241. 241
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    ESJ (#215) – depends on your understanding of the demographics – if you think vet affairs is only about returned combat personell from the 1940’s and 50’s, then you’re take is correct. Problem is – it’s not. What about Vietnam vets, merchant seaman, Gulf War vets (both conflicts), veterans of countless peacekeeping missions, people involved in atomic testing….the list goes on. As I said, yours is a superficial and generally poor understanding of the portfolio. WWII vets and widows dropping off the twig does not mean that Vet Affairs is an irrelevant or increasingly irrelevant portfolio.

  242. 242
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    yeah but thats 89% counted he’s safe…

    All Hail Admiral Nelson!

  243. 243
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    YES!

    Just picked up nett $400 on Lord Nelson, many thanks to William and your cheque is in the mail.

  244. 244
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    HOLY CRAP!

    Nelson wins!!!

  245. 245
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Nelson has the unholy alliance of conservatives and anti-Turnbull moderates behind him. Nelson, from what I gather, is a moderate, which means he’s got to move his personal views to the right.

    And of course, Turnbull will be waiting there on his frontbench (presumably), waiting for Nelson to stuff up and launch a leadership challenge…

  246. 246
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Now, now Observer, Kevin told us we had to look beyond the “old battles”.

  247. 247
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    238 [The other way to get a non-partisan Speaker would be to appoint Katter or Windsor as the Speaker.]

    Katter has been known to turn up to meetings days late. He won’t be responsible for anything.

  248. 248
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Bishop deputy

  249. 249
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Matthew Cole@238. Katter as Speaker??!!! HAHAHAHA I can imagine that giant hat of his as the perfect accessory to the Speaker’s robe. He wouldn’t expel the honorable members from the chamber – he’d leap over the Speaker’s desk and go the biff…”And F**@@N STAY OUT!!!

  250. 250
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    This is a great day for UNION BOSSES.

    UNION BOSSES are taking over the Liberal party.

  251. 251
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Dickson looks like being extremely close. There are 5000 uncounted absentee ballots, which are favouring Labor 51/49. But there are 3000 uncounted postals and pre-polls left which favour Libs 52/48. So we’re just going to have to watch and wait now…

  252. 252
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Steve #248,

    Then Windsor instead. But my principle remains – an Indie Speaker would generally be non-partisan.

  253. 253
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Hemigway (#230),
    did you happen to catch this little exchange on Lateline. I was in fits of laughter…..

    TONY ABBOTT: But Peter has had many meals at the Lodge with John Howard.

    TONY JONES: Why wasn’t he at this one?

    TONY ABBOTT: He and Tania hadn’t been to a foursome with John and Jeanette.

    TONY JONES: I hate even to contemplate the thought of that. But why wasn’t…

    TONY ABBOTT: I would have loved to have been at such a gathering. And of course, Peter and Tania had been at gathering with John and Jeanette and other people.

    All i can say is eeeeeewwwwwwwwwww!!!!!!

  254. 254
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Once Abbott pulled out, a Nelson victory was always more than likely. Abbott will have pulled out because he knew Turnbull would win otherwise.

  255. 255
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    This is going to be hilarious – both parties are going to have simultaneous press conferences!!!

  256. 256
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Oh great, Bishop is deputy! The Libs will still be fighting for WorkChoices.

  257. 257
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Optimist #255,

    For the sake of Rudd’s chances in 2010, I hope that Abbott never shuts his mouth. It should be interesting to see his & Gillard’s reactions to facing of in Parliament again – from a reversed position.

  258. 258
    Petrie is Coming Home
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    I look forward to seeing Turnbull go quietly to the back bench. ha ha ha .

  259. 259
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Snowden gets defence personnel, Fitzgibbon keeps defence, Wong has climate change AND water.

  260. 260
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    and what about maxine? anyone care to make a prediction before 1pm (when rudd reveals all)?

  261. 261
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    252 [UNION BOSSES are taking over the Liberal party.]

    Looks like the days of 70% Liberal Lawyers are over. They can’t even get a Liberal lawyer up as leader these days.

  262. 262
    Nostradamus
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    Dr Brendan Nelson will be the next PM of Australia! And what’s more, someone who was once in the service of Evil and who has been redeemed. Proves that there’s hope for everyone on these forums yet.

    I wish I had put some money on him, the bookmakers were offering some juicy odds.

  263. 263
    Nostradamus
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Bishop is deputy yayyyyy!!!!

  264. 264
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    Senior Flinders Academic heard this morning: “I should have failed that bastard when I had the chance”.

  265. 265
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:52 pm | Permalink

    JULIE ;)

    Lord Nelson

    Julie Bishop

    :)

  266. 266
    Bring Back CL's blog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Garrett should have been punted. He has been hopeless as a politician.

    Nelson is good for the liberals as he wil ltake the opprobium of being opposition leader get thrashed and then hand over to Turnbull who could win after that.

    however I can see a bad press for Nelson and he mightn’t even hang in there.
    how many times will we hear he is a half nelson!

  267. 267
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Maxine is not going to get anything (Except perhaps a parliamentary secretary position).

  268. 268
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Optimist

    To be honest I agree with ESJ on veterans affairs. All the groups you mention exist, but, relative to the size of other needy groups that don’t get a Minister of their own (homeless, mentally ill, disabled) the numbers are frankly tiny. I think the existence of a separate ministry to cater for such a comparatively small group is increasingly hard to justify.

  269. 269
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    264
    Nostradamus – Not only has Nelson had ministerial experience that Rudd hasn’t but he’s got leadership experience to boot with the AMA a wise choice for leader.

    JULIE FOR DEPUTY HURRAY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  270. 270
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    passthepopcorn #262

    Communications for McKew. She’d have a ball there.

  271. 271
    Webroar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    SMH is reporting Nelson winning Lib leadership. They have obviously opted to fade out rather than flame out.

  272. 272
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    This is the fourth time a Labor rat has headed the non-Labor forces (after Cook, Hughes and Lyons). Can’t you guys find any talent of your own?

  273. 273
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    I humbly (or not so humbly) suggest that the Libs have f*cked up by not electing Turnbull as their leader (unless they don’t want to win in 2010). Turnbull had the only chance of winning votes from Labor – Nelson is just another talking head.

    To me, he seems a lot like Crean – very dull and has picked up the Libs leadership not through any inspiring vision but by courting the Lib right and some bored backbenchers…

  274. 274
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    I’d like to thank Tony and Brenda for ensuring that Malcolm’s ambition has been kept in check, thereby ensuring many years of leadership battles to come, while the ALP get on with the job of running the country properly.

  275. 275
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus - Not only has Nelson had ministerial experience that Rudd hasn’t but he’s got leadership experience to boot with the AMA a wise choice for leader.

    As of Saturday, Rudd will have something Nelson will never have – prime ministerial experience.

    But i agree with you, that Rudd has never worked as a UNION BOSS, but Nelson has.

  276. 276
    veedub
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Umm, if the Lib vote was 45-42 for Nelson, where do they get 87 members from? I thought with their decimated ranks they could now barely muster 60.

  277. 277
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Brendan Nelson’s version of gravitas looks like self-parody.

  278. 278
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Umm, if the Lib vote was 45-42 for Nelson, where do they get 87 members from? I thought with their decimated ranks they could now barely muster 60.

    The senators get to vote.

  279. 279
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Julie Bishop is a good choice for deputy, in my non-biased opinion.

  280. 280
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Adam #274,

    Remember that neither Menzies nor Fraser were ALP rats – although it looks like Fraser may just become one AFTER being the PM…..

  281. 281
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Yep, Bishop was their best choice as deputy. Still think they should have picked Turnbull as leader…

  282. 282
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    Swing Lowe, i could of made that post when Rudd won the leadership, we’ll see how well Lord Nelson goes and its nice to know we’ve got leadership potential waiting in the wings should we need it while Labor have Rudd or zip!

    How can someone who has a motorbike be dull SL?

    274
    Adam – yes Labor rats have helped us win in the past have they not good news for us Tory’s :)

    JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE, JULIE!

  283. 283
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Brendan Nelson’s an excellent choice – good for him.

    Krudd dumps Bob McMullan selects the vacuous bimbo Ellis for the frontbench? I didn’t think stuff-ups would start so early!

    And as the counting continues, Labor’s “emphatic victory” is looking more and more pathetic.

  284. 284
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    280 [The senators get to vote.]

    Yes, members and senators get to vote in these gigs.

  285. 285
    EdenMonaro Resi
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Nelson – so obviously a stop-gap. At least TRY to make the ALP mildly concerned about the next election.

  286. 286
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    Oh, and Julie Bishop as deputy. Fantastic!

  287. 287
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Glen, I guess we’ll see soon enough whether Nelson was a good choice.

    It would be interesting to see if Turnbull gets into the shadow cabinet and what reward Abbott gets from Nelson for giving him his votes. Could Abbott be the new shadow treasurer? :-P

  288. 288
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Nelson is a conceited, pompous jackass and won’t last until 2010. Turnbull and Abbott will now form an alliance and white-ant him.

  289. 289
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    Iain Duncan-Smith here we come !

  290. 290
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Did the Libs announce the voting for deputy? I’d just be amused to know how many votes Chris Pyne got? He said himself, he has “political instinct”. ROTFL.

  291. 291
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    285 [Brendan Nelson’s an excellent choice - good for him.]

    He’s very popular with the Labor voters Steven Kaye because it means a Union Boss has been placed at the top of the Liberal Parliamentary party. Beautiful!!!

  292. 292
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    “What percettage of Liberal leaders are former union bosses?”

    [menacing voice] “100%”

  293. 293
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    I can think of two reasons why Nelson won.

    1) He is expendable. Put him in charge will the fires rage then switch to Turnball.
    2) Turnball is not liked.

    Being able to win an election is not on my list.

    I’ll be interested to see how Bishop goes. I think she has a very high style to substance ratio – and she’ll make little progress. But we’ll see….

  294. 294
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:02 pm | Permalink

    Dr Brendan Nelson will be the next PM of Australia!

    Nostradamus,

    I see you are continuing with your perfect score for predictions. So far you’ve scored a big fat zero for everything you’ve said would happen. Not ONE single prediction you’ve made so far this year has come true. Yesterday you said the Libs would win the elections on postals. And today another bound to fail prediction. Keep up the good work.

  295. 295
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Perfect result for Labor supporters: Turnball, Abbott and possibly Costello will have the knives out for Nelson, watch the Liberals implode even further LOL
    Glen, you can salivate all you want over Julie Bishop.
    My girl Kate Ellis is in Cabinet Woohoo!

  296. 296
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Hey steve with Dr. Nelson as our leader, we can lock in the Doctor’s wives for 2010 LOL!

  297. 297
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    The ABC stream is up.

    http://www.abc.net.au/streaming/networktv.asx

    What room is that?

  298. 298
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull was offering a real break from the past for the Libs. The elevation of Nelson suggests to me that the Libs are not yet ready to make a clear break. There is a sense of hesitation and caution with really moving forward.

    Plus, with only a very narrow win for Nelson, the party room is clearly divided. Abbott is also there hinting at taking another shot at the leadership in the future. So not exactly a very stable situation. I doubt that Nelson will ever feel very secure in his leadership position.

    But the good news for Labor is that Rudd is going to be firmly in the spotlight and will have a lot of clear air for shaping the political agenda for the future. I doubt that the media will take much notice of Nelson, so even after a year, a lot of people out there in voterland will still be asking Nelson-who?

    I suspect that Nelson’s biggest and most important job will not be taking up the fight with Rudd but trying to bring together the moderates and extremists in his own party. In other words, his will be a party rebuilding role and much less about taking a shot for becoming the next PM.

  299. 299
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    #287 -

    “At least TRY to make the ALP mildly concerned about the next election.”

    Little man, they should be concerned. As things stand now, according to Malcolm Mackerras, the Coalition only needs a 2.7% swing to win next time, and could govern with the help of independents with just a 2% swing.

    Krudd, like Whitlam, is going to be a joke of a one-term PM-wannabe.

  300. 300
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Didn’t Nostro predict the Libs would win the NSW State Election? Wrong at the state level as well.

    Maybe you should try to predict the result in the Brisbane council election next year? If you can get that right, maybe some of us will believe your predictions…

  301. 301
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Nostrodamus’s predictions are about as reliable as Ben Cousins staying drug free LOL

  302. 302
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Yes Bredan Nelson is the living embodiment of stop-gap. He exudes mediocrity, a mis-guided sense of self-importance – and the way he puts on a deep, serious voice for what he sees as important announcements is just beyond comedy.

  303. 303
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    Little man, they should be concerned. As things stand now, according to Malcolm Mackerras, the Coalition only needs a 2.7% swing to win next time, and could govern with the help of independents with just a 2% swing.

    Krudd, like Whitlam, is going to be a joke of a one-term PM-wannabe.

    And Labor needs a 1.5% swing to win another 10 seats.

  304. 304
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    SK,

    Whitlam had 2 terms – one from 1972 to 1974 and one from 1974 to 1975. Get your facts right…

  305. 305
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    and the way he puts on a deep, serious voice for what he sees as important announcements is just beyond comedy.

    He calls it his Super Hornet voice.

  306. 306
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye: back again? I heard you had a hissy fit on election night and stormed off the board. Have you calmed down after a few tablets from your Liberal troll nanny?

  307. 307
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    glen, your taste in women (and political parties) is appalling!

  308. 308
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:05 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye – pretty sure Whitlam won two elections.

  309. 309
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Flash Rudd does the same thing, look at him talking about Bernie Banton he does the exact same thing as Nelson.

  310. 310
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Glen: One of them is Prime Minister-elect, one is Opposition Leader-elect…

  311. 311
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    Terrible result for the libs. 43 votes to 45 means Nelson will be white anted till Turnbull’s ready for another challenge.

  312. 312
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    SK #301,

    1. Whitlam won in 1972, then again in 1974.

    2. Please stop the infantile name-calling. Kevin Rudd is now the PM-elect of Australia. That’s due at least a little respect (and yes, I said much the same to people who bashed Howard on a personal level).

  313. 313
    Kate Ellis for PM
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Nelson is a sacrificial goose- who will probably last about 18 months. He was once a member of the ALP and president of AMA- so now a ‘union boss’ taking over the Liberals! What an irony!

    Happy to see my local member (Kate Ellis) been promoted.

  314. 314
    NB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, 42/45

  315. 315
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    If the vote split 45 to 42, that makes 87 votes. Who exactly is voting here? The Coalition only has 58 seats (so far)….

  316. 316
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:08 pm | Permalink

    So much for the 1pm presser. Perhaps Kevin’s running on QLD time.

  317. 317
    mate
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Nelson YES!!!

    Thats $300 profit for the Fed election and wait for it … $900 for the Libs leader ballot.

    Yes yes yes!!!

  318. 318
    barney
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Did you manage to get on at 6-1 William?

  319. 319
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    311 Rudd has never been a Union Boss but the Leader of the opposition was a Union Boss. Glen I can now understand what all the Liberal advertising using taxpayers money was really all about now. The Liberals were warning us of what they planned after the election.

  320. 320
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    53 Liberal Lower House members + 34 Senators = 87

  321. 321
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Well, Swing Lowe, one and a bit terms – that second period of chaos can’t seriously be called a term of government.

  322. 322
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Andos #317,

    Both MHRs and Senators get to vote in a leadership ballot, in both parties.

  323. 323
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Hey, at least we have a competent alternative option to put in should Nelson fail with Malcolm waiting in the wings who does Labor have, Swan?

    And didn’t Rudd win by this margin 3 or 2 votes and he won the election?

    Lord Nelson
    Julie Thatcher

    SWEET!

  324. 324
    KT
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    I will say only that the 6-to-1 odds on Brendan Nelson from SportingBet look remarkably attractive from what I’m hearing.

    Anybody get any bets in?

    I suppose it’s nice my local MP is now the leader of the floundering Libs, but he is quite useless. Julie Bishop only has marginally more utility – she’s only memorable for the hair, the eyes and the occasional bizarre anti-commie/lefty quote. Good to see it was a narrow win, and I’m sure there will be more exciting Liberal leadership games to come.

  325. 325
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    No comment on the deputy votes, they obviously didn’t want to hurt Pyne’s feelings.

  326. 326
    Nostradamus
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Whitlam won two elections – the second was a double dissolution that he had to do to get anything through. However, he only lasted a total of three years, the length of one ordinary term.

    Labor will lose government with a swing of less than 2% next time round. Governments rarely get a swing towards them in their second election; they should be very concerned indeed.

    The Krudd ministry that is unveiled today is essentially the same rag-tag joke that lounged around the Opposition Benches in the Crean-Latham era a few years ago, a bunch of union-hack hyenas devoid of talent and shorn of competence. Meanwhile the Liberal caucus remains stacked with up and coming star material putting them in good stead for 2010.

  327. 327
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Given the tight margin, and with the Libs in front in a few of the 6 or 7 undecided seats, maybe Turnbull can ask for a recount when the vote count is finalised? After all, it would be a shame to end this process too soon :)

  328. 328
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    Andos @ 317

    Senators vote too

  329. 329
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    On Veterans benefits declining with time, see
    http://www.themonkeycage.org/2007/11/the_longterm_economic_cost_of_1.html

    “as of 1967, 1,353 dependents of [American] Civil War veterans were still drawing benefits”

  330. 330
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    As an ex-Liberal supporter I’ve got say I’m not tempted back to the conservative fold by Nelson/Bishop. The penny hasn’t dropped with the Libs. They’ll need one more election loss to convince them the party needs a major reform. Nelson/Bishop is a good result for Labor but a bad one for the Conservatives.

  331. 331
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    No comment on the deputy votes, they obviously didn’t want to hurt Pyne’s feelings.

    He got his own vote. He was promised another vote, but Abbott turned up late.

  332. 332
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull will come from behind to win on postals.

  333. 333
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Ah yes, I forgot about the honourable Senators.

  334. 334
    Geepee
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus

    Govts OFTEN get swings towards them in the second term

  335. 335
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Danny Yee

    the decline over time is the point, but even to start with, Australia has a far smaller proportion of the population eligible to be veterans than the US does.

  336. 336
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    If anyone is interested, Guiliani is self-destructing somewhat on CNN in a Republican debate. He says he would refuse to sign a federal ban on abortion from Congress if the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade.

  337. 337
    frank frederic
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Nelson?! What a bad choice!
    He looked as wicked and untrustworthy as Ruddock.
    Turnbull is a nice, round and public-friendly fellas.

  338. 338
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Close seats update:
    Labor now ahead by 60 in Bowman and 129 in Herbert.

  339. 339
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    336 [Govts OFTEN get swings towards them in the second term]

    Just like Beattie in Queensland, a narrow win and massive majority since.

  340. 340
    Kate Ellis for PM
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    334 Ashley

    Hilarious!

  341. 341
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    did anyone see that most unfortunate photo yesterday of mr pyne astride a drain hole? it certainly detracted from the “gravitas” he was trying to project.

  342. 342
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Nostradamus #328,

    1. I seem to recall you claiming that Howard would win this election convincingly – no kudos to you there.

    2. “Stacked” is the operative term to describe the LP frontbench – such of it as remains after the dual harrowings of the election and Nelson’s inevitable purge.

  343. 343
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Am I right that a few of the Liberals who voted today haven’t officially won their seats yet, like Fran Bailey(there are those 3000 votes still to count), Peter Lindsay, Peter Dutton, Dave Tollner etc? So a few of Nelson’s votes could be considered invalid.

  344. 344
    Ville
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye, your predictions are terrific. What were you predicting for this election?

  345. 345
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Look what we didn’t get:

    Abbott and Costello

    Abbott and Bishop

    Lord Nelson and Lord Downer (of Baghdad)

    Malcolm and Turnbull (he’d take both PM and Deputy with his ego!)

    Crikey, they had some cracker combo’s, eh?

  346. 346
    cobber
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    328 nostra could go the other way if the ruddster runs a tight ship. the libs now aren’t sitting on the fat margins they were last time and a lot of seats could fall.

  347. 347
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    The modern Liberal party: hard of earring.

  348. 348
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    HH, from what i read the RO of the Lib Meeting allowed MPs who were ahead on the count to vote, i wonder if Steve Irons flew over to vote?

  349. 349
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Watch as Turnbull poisons Nelson’s leadership attempt. He did it with Howard and he will do it with Nelson.

  350. 350
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Nostrodamus and Steven Kaye, you two blokes are full of crap!
    Glen puts the rest of you conservative idiots to shame!
    You can bet there will be a redistribution in one or more states before 2010, which will change the margins in seats, and Maxine McKew will greatly increase her margin in Bennelong next time without Howard’s personal vote to worry about.

  351. 351
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    Bishop means nothing – that hideous old man that the Nats are electing as leader will be the Deputy Opposition Leader – so any “gain” has been wiped out already.

  352. 352
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    313 & 315 – This is not necessarily bad for the LNP or even from Turnbull’s perspective – instead of Turnbull getting worn and tarnished during the tough, dead years, he can now sit back for for a while and jump into the leadership fresh and new with say 9 months to go before the next election. That’s if he uses the time in between to develop more support in his own ranks – instead of just in his own head. That’s the trouble with an ego as big as his, the opinions of lesser mortals don’t matter.

    The other problem for Mal is that over the same period, the NSW uglies will be organising in the state branches and among the parliamentary party and will have a better puppet than the Monk, and firmer numbers, by the time the Admiral is due to be knifed.

  353. 353
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Both Nelson and Bishop have their roots in South Australia. As do Gillard (well, Wales for four years) and Rein.

  354. 354
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    LTEP Turnbull has a better chance to challenge than Abbott, that’s a given.

  355. 355
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    The smart thing for the Libs would have been to parachute Mal Brough into Nelson’s seat but it’s too late now and they will just have to be content with a union boss instead of a much loved genius.

  356. 356
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    338
    Flash

    Yep, Roooody is about as palatable as a pork chop in the Middle Eastern place of worship (choose one or both!)

    So, Huckabee to roll Mr DogFood (Romney)?

  357. 357
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Hmm – so Truss will be the Deputy Opposition Leader? Interesting…

  358. 358
    EdenMonaro Resi
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Oh yessss, Mackerrras – unerringly correct as always. The needed swing is academic – Nelson is unlikely to get it for whats left of the LNP. But someone had to take the first bite of the brown sanger… :)

  359. 359
    Yoyoma
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Anyone else just clean up on Nelson? I made a cool $1k.

  360. 360
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    LTEP, lord nelson will manage that without malcolm’s help.
    hey, rudd’s on news radio.

  361. 361
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Lord Cockatoo Nelson takes over as Leader and Shadow Minister for Truth
    Julie Googly Eyes Bishop takes over as Shadow Minister for Domination

  362. 362
    Michael
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull lost. Liberals screwed.

  363. 363
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    349
    Inner Westie

    Cracker!!!

  364. 364
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    So what is the actual job of Deputy Lib leader……..you get to push the tea trolley?

  365. 365
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    If Mal Brough was so loved how come the good folk of Longman chucked him out with a whopping swing in favour of a Labor hack with a beard?

  366. 366
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    So what is the actual job of Deputy Lib leader……..you get to push the tea trolley?

    You get to stab the leader in the back after 18 months.

  367. 367
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Downer is so far the only Liberal leader to have never gone to election. Lets see if Nelson manages to join him.

  368. 368
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    If Mal Brough was so loved how come the good folk of Longman chucked him out with a whopping swing in favour of a Labor hack with a beard?

    Glen has this weird idea that if someone deserves to be re-elected, then they should be re-elected, and that it isn’t necessary to count any votes.

  369. 369
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Patrons de PB, it’s come to our attention that some people are still reading posts from trolls, and worse, attempting to reason with them.

    THIS SHOULD STOP IMMEDIATELY!

    Rememer, once a troll, always a troll, and good arguments are but pearls before swine.

  370. 370
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Don’t know why the Lib party hacks are all so happy with Bishop being deputy, she supports the old ways including supporting WorstChoices. The public will punish the Libs even further.

  371. 371
    Rebecca
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    Most of the changes in the composition of the Rudd ministry seem to make sense (getting rid of dead wood like Laurie Ferguson is excellent), but I have to say that I’m bewildered at Bob McMullan and Kate Lundy being demoted. Both of them are *fantastic* MPs, and would have made excellent ministers.

  372. 372
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    361
    Yoyoma – you were very smart, Nelson has always wanted to be the leader and he’s been in Parliament for 11 years, he was always going to win, its just that the media backed Turnbull. Gee if Turnbull had shut up this week he might be the leader lol!

    The crow eaters have taken over Parliament Phil lol!

    Viva Lord Nelson and Julie Thatcher Bishop.

  373. 373
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    354
    jaundiced view Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 1:18 pm
    313 & 315 - This is not necessarily bad for the LNP...

    The problem for the Libs is that Nelson and Bishop will never make the reforms the party needs for the long term. They’ll make minimun changes which won’t solve any of their problems.

  374. 374
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Julia Gillard gets Education to go with Industrial Relations!

  375. 375
    Albert F
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    “steve Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 1:13 pm
    336 [Govts OFTEN get swings towards them in the second term]

    Just like Beattie in Queensland, a narrow win and massive majority since.”

    - you could add to that Bracks who juuust squeaked into a minority govt and then eviscerated the Libs at the next election

  376. 376
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Peter Garrett = Environment, Heritage and the Arts
    Penny Wong = Climate Change and Water (responsible for international negotiations)

  377. 377
    Aristotle
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    This will be Howard/Peacock all over again, except this time, we’ll have Nelson/Turnbull/Abbott.

    Costello was the only one who would have been able to hold the party together, like Beazley did after 1996 and 2004, these three will only result in its division.

    The Liberal Party will need to do some very hard thinking, Federally and at a State level to rebuild, but it will take a long time.

    I suspect the next Liberal PM is not even in the parliament. He/she will probably enter in 2010, like Rudd and Gillard did in 1998.

  378. 378
    Amused
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    I’m disappointed to hear that Nelson is the leader of the Libs. I’ll never forget his appalling Kokoda speech. Nelson also thinks teaching ‘Intelligent Design’ in schools is a good idea – this from when he was minister for education.

    I suppose there’s some comfort knowing he is very unlikely to be primeminister. Those who take over a party after a loss rarely (ever?) become PM.

  379. 379
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Kev says he’s taking Peter and Penny to Bali.. Sounds comical somehow.

  380. 380
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    Yoyama @ 361 – me too. Money for jam at those odds. Even got $15.50 for some of it against Nelson on Betfair. What a great punting election this has been. Great to win money off the misfortune of the conservatives – it adds that extra level of satisfaction you don’t get from the horses. The best for that feeling was Maxine.

  381. 381
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    Are Combet, Shorten and Maxine parliamentary secretaries?

  382. 382
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    The hack with a beard may soon be clean shaven (depending on his instrument).

  383. 383
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Gillard in Education how surprising? Not

    As IR is now largely deregulated and will largely stay deregulated, Gillard obviously wanted something in which she could really get stuck into the social engineering.

    Lundy – going down, for mine that could only be topped if Belinda Neal lost Robertson in late counting.

  384. 384
    charles
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Oh well let the comedy begin.

  385. 385
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t Rudd going to love fixing the Hospital funding while Union Boss Nelson looks on from the wrong side of the despatch box.

  386. 386
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Yay, Nicola Roxon stays in Health.

  387. 387
    Parramatta Moderate
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    I’m really disappointed to see Nelson get up. What were they thinking? Turnbull might be a risk, but he was a fresh face, and somebody who could lead the Liberals back towards the centre, with fresh policies on the republic, aboriginal issues, IR and so on. I would have taken a serious interest in the Liberals under Turnbull, but Nelson is just a pompous prat. I think they got the deputy right, although I’m not sure if I feel this way just because she is reasonably articulate and presents well, I’m less sure if there is any substance there. Gillard vs Bishop will be an interesting battle.

    Things are looking a lot brighter for Labor in Herbert and Bowman, while Robertson and Corangamite are safe, and Dickson is back in play. I feel nervous about Flynn and Solomon though.

  388. 388
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Shouldn’t we trust a Doctor to fix the hospital system over somebody who was referred to as Dr Death?

  389. 389
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    He used to wear an earring and his brother died from AIDS. Been married three times doancherno. Couldn’ he keep ‘em happy? No smoke without fire I always say.

  390. 390
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    “Roxon in health? That’s bullshit” – Tony Abbott.

  391. 391
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    Turn it up, Glen.

  392. 392
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    Nicola is my new favourite Labor politician!

  393. 393
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    Steven Smith in Foreign Affairs.

  394. 394
    Antonio
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    Jeez won’t Bill Heffernan be spewing when he finds out that a Chinese lesbian is the minister for Climate and Water!!

    With any luck, he’ll resign from the shock.

  395. 395
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    390 [Shouldn’t we trust a Doctor to fix the hospital system over somebody who was referred to as Dr Death?]

    No, He’s Nelson’s his chance and failed that is why the people voted for change. They want results not years of neglect which the Liberals delivered to health with their perpetual underfunding.

  396. 396
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Im pretty sure if Dutton holds on he’ll get a good front bench position.

    Bishop will probably take shadow treasurer unless they give it to Mr. T ;)

    Abbott will probably chose what he wants after all his support must have tipped Nelson across the line.

  397. 397
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    Glen, which seat did Jack Kevorkian win? (Wait a minute … Kev … orkian …)

  398. 398
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Glen, noone cares about the Shadow Ministry positions.

  399. 399
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    mcclelland – A-G.
    excellent
    stephen smith – FA

  400. 400
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    I have to say, I’m glad Robb didn’t get deputy. He still has to answer for his attempt to say 13 ALP candidates were ineligible to stand, and for the Lindsay affair when he went on Lateline.

  401. 401
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Glen, your side should promote Bruce Billson, Greg Hunt and Tony Smith.

  402. 402
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    LTEP you did when Labor was in Opposition, cmon LTEP this is all we have now lol ;)

  403. 403
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    McClelland puts me to sleep, which probably means he’s a good choice for AG

  404. 404
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Half of Parliamentary Secretaries “newly elected to Parliament”.

  405. 405
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    Well Robb will get a senior position but yes those moderate Libs from Victoria should get a go i reckon after all we need to build up support in Victoria its a wasteland for us atm.

  406. 406
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Roy & H.G. are going to LOVE Kate Ellis as Minister for Sport!

  407. 407
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    McKew gets Parliamentary Secretary for Early Childhood Education and Childcare

  408. 408
    BV
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Bahahahahahahahaha!!! Nelson!!!

    What will Turnbull do now if Nelson won’t apologise, ratify Kyoto or allow Workchoices to be repealed?!

    Oh my, with Malcolm and Tony in the background, Brendan will be able to feel very safe indeed!

  409. 409
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    I think we are forgetting about an important political issue in debating the Liberal Party leadership – political cartoons and satire! Who would Alan Moir rather draw – Nelson or Turnbull? Will we see them draw Nelson as a captain on a burning deck, or a doctor standing over a deceased patient? Or will it be Turnbull, martini in hand, dodging knives from Abbott? What about Deputy – The Eyes Have It (Bishop) versus the imposing Chris Pyne? So many good options.

    For that matter, the Chaser team will be affected too. Shouldn’t these affected parties get a vote in the process? I would certainly trust the Chaser’s expert opinion on who is the best Liberal Party leader for the sake of comedy. C’mon Liberals – embrace true democracy and give the people who really matter a vote!

  410. 410
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Combet gets Parliamentary Secretary to Defence.

  411. 411
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Andos, so that means Combet, Shorten, McKew, Kelly, Mark Dreyfuss get jobs?

  412. 412
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Wow politics is crazy we have a wannabe Liberal as head of the ALP and a former ALP member and AMA President leading the Liberals.

    Is this bizzaro world or what?

  413. 413
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    maxine – parl sec (early childhood edn and childcare). yay!
    greg combet – parl sec – defence
    mike kelly – parl sec – defence

  414. 414
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Kelly also Secretary to Defence.

  415. 415
    Weary Dunlop
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:39 pm | Permalink

    Woo ! Or should I say Ha! Ha!

    Go Nelson!

    As in Nelson Muntz – school bully at Springfield Elementary in the Simpson’s.

    Neslon will keep you wandering in the desert where you belong, you right wing maddies and bullying baddies!

  416. 416
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Is this bizzaro world or what?

    No, Labor is in government, Liberal is in opposition. We have just returned to the normal world after 11.5 years in bizarro world.

  417. 417
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    Shorten: Secretary to Families, Housing, Family Services and Indigenous Affairs.

  418. 418
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

    Tony Burke is an odd choice for Primary Industries: has he ever been on a farm?

  419. 419
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    I think the Shorten and Burke appointments are interesting. The real potential future threats to Rudd on the right kept at the most appropriate distance possible.

  420. 420
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Try this:

    Google Julie Bishop

    but beware:

    She ‘googles’ back!

  421. 421
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Who’s in charge of the Pork barrel, I mean Minister for Industry and/or road funding.

  422. 422
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    HH, now my pick for the Minister of Administrative Affairs is ………. Simon Crean.

  423. 423
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Ferguson gets “Shadow Minister for Multicultural Affairs” – bit of a Freudian Slip there from K Rudd, you’re not in opposition any more!

  424. 424
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Glen, Crean got Trade.

  425. 425
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    HH, now my pick for the Minister of Administrative Affairs is ………. Simon Crean.

    Crean got trade.

  426. 426
    Martin B
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    The problem with Garrett in Environment is nothing to do with his ability, and I agree that criticism of him in this regard has mostly been unfair. The problem is that if he is continually rolled on Environment issues – and it doesn’t appear that a Rudd government is going to be a very deep shade of green – then the Garrett ‘brand’ is devalued.

  427. 427
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Okay… WTF, 2 secretaries for defence? Is Labor shaping up for some big challenges within the ADF?

  428. 428
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    420
    Howard Hater

    That’s a promotion for a damn good performance. Tony Burke is not a show pony and has that excellent laconic manner which is respected in the bush.

  429. 429
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    You don’t see the joke, obviously you haven’t watched Yes Minister…

    When’s the next poll?

  430. 430
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Any ideas why McMullan got dropped? Could it be that he will actually be speaker?

  431. 431
    Andos the Great
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Kevin now trying to get out of his Affirmative Action responsibilities by saying he is proud of having 7 women in cabinet…

  432. 432
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    Denis Napthine, Robert Doyle, Ted Baillieu: all visionary statesman worthy of a global stage. Victoria was too parochial for their dignified and intelligent leadership.

  433. 433
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:45 pm | Permalink

    4 in Cabinet; 7 in ministries

  434. 434
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Who is Immigration Minister?

  435. 435
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Dave from Albury will you still be on the AC Nielsen on-line poll panel?

    No doubt you will be giving the thumbs down and thumps up to the Government and Opposition line ups?

  436. 436
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Who is Immigration Minister?

    Chris Evans.

  437. 437
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    428 I think Garrett will get to play a key role with the targets to be set next year for cutting greenhouse gases and promoting renewable energy.

  438. 438
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    Howard Hater, Senator Chris Evans, Leader of the Government in the Senate

  439. 439
    Yo Ho Ho
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Can someone tell me who is Chris Evans is?

  440. 440
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Thanks guys!
    Stephen Conroy and Crean: I would have dropped both of them!

  441. 441
    Burgey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    432 – I thought when Labor won that McMullan would be a good choice as Speaker.

  442. 442
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    conroy min for broadband

  443. 443
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Conroy in. Boradband and Digital Economy?

  444. 444
    A-C
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Is this one of the first times a Victorian Lib has not been in a main leadership role?

    If that’s that case, then it says many a thing about the pathetic excuse for a party the Victorian Libs are.

  445. 445
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Dario (#432),
    I would like to think that McMullan will get Speaker – if he doesn’t, there can be only one reason a man of his intellect and experience was dropped……..ffffffffactionalism!

  446. 446
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    I missed Chris Bowen. What did he get?

  447. 447
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    When is Lord Nelson going to hold a press conference?

    “Hi I’m Brendan I’m from New South Wales i ride i motorbike and im here to help.”

  448. 448
    A-C
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    I’m actually kind of surprised that Kevin didn’t name himself “Minister for Everything”.

  449. 449
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    A-C, WA currently has the same number of Members and senators as Victoria so I think they managed to shoulder them out of the way.

  450. 450
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:50 pm | Permalink

    Indigenous Affairs?

  451. 451
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    fagin – jenny macklin

  452. 452
    Bring Back CL's blog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    conroy’s kid suffers from ADSL and has to take pills for it.

    wire is it so

  453. 453
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    A-C – Rudd is smart enough to know that he needs to allow time for himself to keep a tight rein over these guys. He wants to run a very tight ship and giving himself too much to do would undermine that objective.

  454. 454
    EdenMonaro Resi
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    anything on Minister for Cows, sheep and wheat (agriculture)??

  455. 455
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    449 [When is Lord Nelson going to hold a press conference?]

    Why would Nelson hold a press conference? Who wants to be told bad news?

  456. 456
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    Predictions: Who are the weakest links in the new Labor ministry? Who will mess up first? Who will lose his/her job first?

  457. 457
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    I just hope Nelson and Turnbull aren’t the Howard/Peacock of the 1980s.

    That we don’t need.

  458. 458
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    EdenMonaro Resi – Tony Burke.

  459. 459
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Flash,

    Thats easy

    McClelland and Garrett. Note that he (KR) has given others overlapping responsibilities with theirs.

  460. 460
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    Stage left: By gee, Huckabee is impressive. He could beat Hilary. (CNN, Republican debate)

  461. 461
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    I mean what is the difference between Minister for Home affairs and AG?

  462. 462
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    459 It will be Abbott/Nelson where the tension will be greatest. It is always the person closest to the Leader who is most likely to be the underminer.

  463. 463
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    But Abbott will never have the numbers, all Abbott could do is threaten to remove him for Malcolm though i doubt that.

  464. 464
    EdenMonaro Resi
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:56 pm | Permalink

    non-rural/regional southwest Sydney Tony Burke? ummmm….

  465. 465
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    Re: Warren Truss – the Nats might as well have elected Professor Farnsworth from “Futurama” as their leader!

    (For those that don’t get that – in the series Farnsworth is 160 years old)

  466. 466
    Aristotle
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    A-C Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 1:49 pm
    “Is this one of the first times a Victorian Lib has not been in a main leadership role?
    If that’s that case, then it says many a thing about the pathetic excuse for a party the Victorian Libs are?”

    Robert Ray was suggesting on Sat night, that it is the VIC Libs (ie Kroger) who will be the one’s who need to fix the Liberal party’s problems. The NSW Libs are in the hands of the rabid right.

  467. 467
    Flash
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Mike Huckabee was just asked about Nasa space programme.. He said “Perhaps Hilary could be on the first rocket to Mars”. Not bad.

  468. 468
    A-C
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull is the sort of O-L that would only shine during recession, I believe.

    Otherwise, he seems too aloof and arrogant – I can’t imagine ‘battlers’ warming to him.

  469. 469
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Burke in Primary industry – what’s that about?

  470. 470
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    Just what the nation needs …

    “Dr Nelson was the first education minister to exercise his ministerial power to stymie projects from receiving funding through the ARC, even though they had been approved by the council after extensive selection by experts in their fields.”

    Brendan and the GDR

  471. 471
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Amazingly enough, John Murphy from Lowe got a Parliamentary Secretaryship. I have to admit, even I’m amazed at this – he must have voted for Rudd in the leadership challenge last year…

  472. 472
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    A-C, you think the battlers will warm to Nelson? This is a genuine question…

  473. 473
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    465 Costello never had the numbers either but he shadowed Howard like a rabid dog until the end. Nelson should just announce the date today that he intends to hand over to Abbott and be done with it. When that date arrives Nelson should hand over.

  474. 474
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    @ 459 Glen Says:

    I just hope Nelson and Turnbull aren’t the Howard/Peacock of the 1980s.

    Some believe that the Libs will be irrelevant by 2010 anyway.

    In today’s SMH pschologist Steve Biddulph writes:

    It’s the ecology, stupid. The Greens will emerge as the new opposition, though this will take probably two election cycles. By the 2010 election, 20 per cent will vote Green, simply because peak oil and climate catastrophe will have proven them right, and thinking people will see the need for austerity now for our children’s tomorrow. The Liberal Party will be lucky to attract 30 per cent, which is the habitual, rusted-on portion of the community that thinks greed is good.

    By 2014, we will have a struggle between a new left and right – Labor and Green – and the issue will be simply how green, how to balance the need for a much simpler and more communal kind of life, with the need to give people comfort and amenity now. This issue will continue to define life for the rest of this century.

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2007/11/28/1196036982629.html

  475. 475
    Burgey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    466 – iirc John Kerin was Member for Werriwa and was Minister for Agriculture under Hawke. He went to an Agricultural HS though.

  476. 476
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    I reckon Education will be handed off to Maxine after a year or two

  477. 477
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    How did Macklin get FACSIA? Surely there were people better qualified for that position…

  478. 478
    Matt D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Sure Tony Burke’s from a city, but what Labor member with a rural background could they give Primary Industry to?

  479. 479
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    *Education, Employment and Workplace relations: Julia Gillard

    *Treasurer: Wayne Swan

    *Finance: Lindsay Tanner

    *Foreign affairs: Stephen Smith

    *Defence: Joel Fitzgibbon

    *Attorney-General: Robert McClelland

    *Cabinet secretary: John Faulkner

    *Health and ageing: Nicola Roxon

    *Families, Housing, Community services and Indigenous affairs: Jenny Macklin

    *Environment, Heritage and The Arts: Peter Garrett

    *Climate change and Water: Penny Wong

    *Trade: Simon Crean

    *Infrastructure, Transport, Regional development and Local government: Anthony Albanese

    *Resources, Energy and Tourism: Martin Ferguson

    *Agriculture, fisheries and forestry: Tony Burke

    *Human services: Joseph Ludwig

    *Innovation, Industry, Science and research: Kim Carr

    *Home affairs : Bob Debus

    *Broadband communications and digital economy: Stephen Conroy

    *Defence, Science and Personnel: Warren Snowdon

    *Workforce participation: Brendan O’Connor

    *Superannuation and Corporate law: Nick Sherry

    *Small business: Craig Emerson

    *Ageing: Justine Elliot

    *Housing and Status of women: Tanya Plibersek

    *Youth and sport: Kate Ellis

    *Veteran affairs: Alan Griffin

    Parliamentary secretaries:

    *Secretary to the Prime Minister, Early childhood education and childcare: Maxine McKew

    *Parliamentary secretary to the Prime Minister: Anthony Byrne

    *Defence procurement: Greg Combet

    *Defence: Mike Kelly

    *Infrastructure – Northern and regional Australia: Gary Gray

    *Disabilities and children services: Bill Shorten

    *Multicultural affairs and settlement programs:Laurie Ferguson

    *International development assistance: Bob McMullan

    *Pacific relations Duncan Kerr

    *Social inclusion: Ursula Stephens

    *Trade: John Murphy

  480. 480
    Megan
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Suspect that Macklin won’t be there for too long.

  481. 481
    A-C
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:05 pm | Permalink

    # 476

    Steve Biddulph, is a moron.

  482. 482
    A-C
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    “*Broadband communications and digital economy: Stephen Conroy”

    LOL! what a complete load of tokenistic bullshit.

  483. 483
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Matt D,

    I would have thought Livermore in Capricornia would have been decent enough.

    I’m guessing Burke is holding Agriculture temporarily until Elliott gets it (or Combet).

  484. 484
    Asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    I got 10-1 on Nelson this morning :P

    Thanks William.

  485. 485
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    *International development assistance: Bob McMullan

    He won’t be happy…

  486. 486
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    Irons up by 146 in Swan. Cheeseman up by 760 in Corangamite. Corangamite is looking increasingly safe…

  487. 487
    Asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    I will organise a donation shortly.

  488. 488
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:08 pm | Permalink

    So who is in Coonan’s old job… is that Conroy?

  489. 489
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    how about immigration?? is it part of home affairs???

  490. 490
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    Housing and Status of women

    Superannuation and Corporate law

    Broadband communications and digital economy

    With the enlargement of the public service, Sir Humphrey Appleby would be proud, well done KR !

  491. 491
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:11 pm | Permalink

    Dario (#481)- so the newcomers to get Parl Sec jobs were Shorten, Combet, McKew, Gary Gray, Mike Kelly and Bob Debus – is that right.
    Can i ask the source of your list?

  492. 492
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    Peter Lindsay is just 10 votes behind the ALP in Herbert with 87% counted.

  493. 493
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    So who is in Coonan’s old job… is that Conroy?

    Yes.

  494. 494
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Given the resutl was 42-45, when the new senators arrive will they hold another ballot?

    That’s essentially a tie. There’s going to be some fun times ahead.

  495. 495
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    492 With the enlargement of the public service, Sir Humphrey Appleby would be proud, well done KR !

    How many ministers did Howard have Glen?

  496. 496
    Donday
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    that Biddulph article competely avoids the possibility that parties these days adapt (ie they’ll move to centre rather than into the wilderness).
    Gillard in education is very interesting…espcially when you think about the things that Nelson did to it you mention inner westie…any ideas on how she views higher education? can we expect to be ignored or given platitudes?

  497. 497
    Greg Rudd
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    #9 I always thought that John Hewson was the Libs Mark Latham!

  498. 498
    passthepopcorn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    A-C @ 443 – i was thinking exactly the same thing about steve biddulph. against childcare centres.

  499. 499
    Webroar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    459 Glen

    The real battle for the soul of the Liberal party is between Abbott and Turnbull. Poor old Brendan is “piggy in the middle” standing there helplessly as the salvos fly overhead. Eventually one of the real contenders will get the numbers and simply dispense with Brendan.

  500. 500
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    So we still don’t know what Chris Bowen has gotten?

    Rudd didn’t mention an Assistant Treasurer, but he said that there was a Cabinet of 20 (suggesting that Bowen is in Cabinet).

  501. 501
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Donday (498) – Biddulph is a child psychologist – buggered if i know why anyone thinks he knows politics (people, please refrain from the predictable – all pollies are like kids gag).

  502. 502
    Emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Financial services? Presumably with Swan and Sherry?

  503. 503
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Can i ask the source of your list?

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/29/2105169.htm

  504. 504
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Can anyone direct me to a definitive list of the new ministry – I’m hearing that McKew is parl sec to the P.M – not Byrne.

  505. 505
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Even if Lindsay wins, he isn’t going to afford that awfully big office he has in the new heart of Townsville (aka right next to Stockland). He will disappear in to obscurity.

    If Colbran gets up, he will make every Maccas his own office.

  506. 506
    Erytnicam
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    IN other news, Julia Gillard was looking forward to her next sleep being sometime in 2020. Education AND industrial relations? Keeps her pretty busy I would guess.
    The current defence minister is obviously a stopgap with two ridiculously qualified people as his parl secs, and Maxine has gotten the reward she deserves – Full time access to the prime ministers ear and two parl sec positions. I hope by 2010 one of the two defence parliament secs has been promoted to minister, and Maxine has gotten the ministry of her choice.

  507. 507
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Optimist, there are two parl secs to the PM, two to the defence minister and two to the foreign affairs minister.

  508. 508
    Emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Chris Bowen is Assistant Treasurer, Minister for Competition Policy & Consumer Affairs – ALP folk just sent me a full list

  509. 509
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Charlie – cheers.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/29/2105169.htm

  510. 510
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    and Maxine has gotten the ministry of her choice

    She will get Education

  511. 511
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    Oh no: Is this what we voted for?
    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,22840697-5012863,00.html

  512. 512
    Donday
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:21 pm | Permalink

    506 here it is (if you can trust the Oz as a definitive provider of anything)

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22841904-11949,00.html

  513. 513
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:22 pm | Permalink

    Emily, is that a Cabinet position? If not, what is the 20th Cabinet spot? Rudd mentioned that there were 20. Maybe Emerson?

  514. 514
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    514 – Nice to see the author didn’t have the balls to own up to that article. No mention that the lateness was to allow the Lib leadership announcement to occur.

  515. 515
    Emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Charlie, on this list Bowen’s in the Outer Ministry.

    The 20 in cabinet are: Rudd, Gillard, Evans, Swan, Faulkner, Crean, Smith, Fitzgibbon, Roxon, Maklin, Tanner, Albo, Conroy, Kim Carr, Penny W, Garrett, Robert Mc, Joe Ludwig, Burke, Martin Ferguson.

  516. 516
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Yeah it’s a pretty terrible article, I was actually quite surprised at how unprofessional it is.

  517. 517
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:26 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for that, Emily.

  518. 518
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    513. What a stupid article. How long would you expect it to take to announce the entire Cabinet, outer ministry and parliamentary secretaries?

  519. 519
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    20 in Cabinet. Everybody wins a prize I guess.

  520. 520
    Blacklight
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Gillard is minister for Education, as well as IR

    w00t

  521. 521
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    ESJ,

    That’s the same size as the last Howard cabinet (I think).

  522. 522
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for all your support on this forum.

    Can I just say that there is no such thing as victory in opposition.
    People should not be thinking in terms of “conventional victories or success” in Opposition.

    Success essentially means that the Liberal Party, supported by its own Right wing Christian factions, will be able to provide protection to its own people for the foreseeable future.

    It will, however, also be a party that will continue to be characterised by degrees of sectarian and other violence and internal wet insurgents who so desperately want to make sure that we remain in Opposition. They will do everything to frustrate and undermine our stay the course message, which has brought us so much success in the past. Why would you risk change and change for change’s sake?

    Ladies and Gentlemen I can guarantee that We of the Liberal Party of Australia are not for turning.

  523. 523
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    John Faulkner is also the Vice President of the Executive Council.

  524. 524
    MayoFeral
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    iirc John Kerin was Member for Werriwa and was Minister for Agriculture under Hawke. He went to an Agricultural HS though.

    Yep, and highly regarded by the industry. AFAIK, he had no farming experience, though he did work for ABARE before going into politics, but that was as an economist.

    Having direct personal experience in a portfolio is not necessarily an asset, especially as one as diverse as PI because of the temptation to believe you have a deeper understanding than than you actually do. An ex chook farmer is more likely to be a hinderance than a help when it comes to matters related to wool, sugar, or fishing, for example.

    In the same vein I wouldn’t want to see Kelly eventually get Defence. Ex ADF defence ministers have generally not been a success. In fact even making Kelly a parl. sec. for it is a mistake, IMHO. He might have been better supporting the A-G with the intention of giving him the job in a few years. I’m personally disappointed that McClelland is the A-G because it pretty much rules out any action on war crimes and probably also AWB and any other former government abuses than may be uncovered.

  525. 525
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Colbran is only 10 votes ahead in Herbert.

  526. 526
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    John Faulkner is also the Vice President of the Executive Council.

    And hopefully Lord Warden of the Cinque Ports.

  527. 527
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    http://www.liberal.org.au/images/NelsonBishop.jpg they look a good team if you ask me ;)

  528. 528
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Brendan, have you changed your mind on why we’re still in Iraq? What is your party’s policy on Iraq now? And how much a hold of the Liberal party do you have, a quarter, half, three quarters or full Nelson?

  529. 529
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    I think Labor can forget about Herbert: too many defence personnel voting Liberal again.

  530. 530
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    527 A great team for opposition glen, I’d give them 15 years there myself. Just never let them near government.

  531. 531
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    20 in Cabinet. Everybody wins a prize I guess.

    No, none for the opposition.

  532. 532
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    they look a good team if you ask me

    Monotone Nelson and Deathstare Bishop. Wow this will be a fun 3 years…

  533. 533
    ed@bennelong
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    506 Labor have had a Dept of Employment, Education and Training in the past. Different emphasis to Liberals of the role of workplace relations.

  534. 534
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    506 Labor have had a Dept of Employment, Education and Training in the past. Different emphasis to Liberals of the role of workplace relations.

    Well, I remember when Workplace Relations was called Industrial Relations like it should be.

  535. 535
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Who will represent the Treasurer in the Senate?

    Carr?

  536. 536
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    No prizes at all for Glen, ESJ, Steven K, Nostrdamus or LETP – you can all stew in your own bile. See you in three years. Our slogan will be “Kevin Again in 2010!”

  537. 537
    ed@bennelong
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    534 Seems like alot of us are having to relearn the ‘right’ terminology. Might take a while to become unconscious thought.

  538. 538
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    So now it’s Kevin v Brendan. We won’t be able to hear the parliamentary stoushes for the snoring.

  539. 539
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:49 pm | Permalink

    I like Glen, but the rest of the Coservative idiots on this board can disappear permanently, thanks very much.

  540. 540
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    Actually Adam, ‘Brendan 010′ sounds much better ;) !

    538
    Neilbris – true but thank god for Albanese and Abbott lol!

  541. 541
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    If Bendan makes it to 2010, I’ll streak naked through Darling Harbour.

  542. 542
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    Actually I think it was 18 in Howard’s cabinet. Early example of controlling the size of government? Not.

  543. 543
    Paulof Kotara
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    Nelson said on AM several days ago that he did not think that Labor had a mandate to change the IR laws and that the coalition was not obligated to support any changes to unfair dismissal. His main object was to make sure his kids grew up with employment oportunities. Just the man to lead the Libs into political oblivion.

  544. 544
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    Yes the trotters are being eased ever so gently into the trough. Same old Labor.

  545. 545
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    541
    Howard Hater – true, true, but i don’t think we’ll hold you to that just in case Malcolm wants a crack after 2010. After all Malcolm will probably have the numbers with the new Senate and MPs who survive the postals. Still i think this is good, it will keep Nelson on his toes and he’ll be working bloody hard which i think is good.

  546. 546
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Actually I think it was 18 in Howard’s cabinet. Early example of controlling the size of government? Not.

    It looks like the cabinet is bigger, but the outer ministry is smaller

  547. 547
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Any guesses for Speaker? I would have picked McMullan but he is a parl sec

  548. 548
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    they look a good team if you ask me

    They look like a couple espousing their success since switching to full time Amway sales.

  549. 549
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    And thanks to you guys the trough is soooooo much bigger. :)

  550. 550
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Dick Adams, he’s already bashed Rudd today on the factions, this gets him out of the way lol!

  551. 551
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Glen 527
    Let me just say, which one of the two featured in the photo is not man enough? Enough said.

    Will 528
    Let me just say this. My role as New Leader of the Opposition is to secure future Oil supplies for this country. I am proud of this and I will not resile from this. A majority of the Parliamentary Liberal party have elected me. Julie is welcome to ride on my coat tail but I’m afraid I won’t be able to find a Shadow Ministry for Malcolm.

  552. 552
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Speaker will be either Jenkins or Price.

  553. 553
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    When will we hear the figures for the deputy vote? I want to know how many people thought that Christopher Pyne could be the future of the party.

  554. 554
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Edward… you’re really whinging about 2 extra ministers? Note the size of the overall Ministry is exactly the same… but you’d assume this will grow over the term of government rather than shrink.

    37.5% of the Labor caucus will have Ministry positions of some type.

  555. 555
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Dave they may leak them, but id think Pyne got less than 10 it was between Bishop and Robb anyway Costello would have done the numbers for Julie.

  556. 556
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Dave they may leak them, but id think Pyne got less than 10 it was between Bishop and Robb anyway Costello would have done the numbers for Julie.

    True – 1 is less than 10.

  557. 557
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 2:57 pm | Permalink

    Paulof Kotara: Looks like the Libs are still on a train wreck to oblivion if the new leader is going to try to block any changes to IR. Given the fact that Bishop is still in favour of WorkChoices, it looks like nothing has changed.

  558. 558
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    They are not in favour of workchoices Will they are in favour of keeping Unfair dismissals out of the IR system.

  559. 559
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Adam – if Jenkins gets Speaker, which right faction person will get president of the Senate? I’m guessing it’s basically a factional carve-up of those two jobs right?

  560. 560
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    LTEP I recall Whitlam could not make the hard decisions about ministry too! As I recall all of them got to be in Cabinet because EGW couldnt bear to deny some.

    There seems to be shades of that here too (but obviously not to the same degree)! I mean the obvious logs got sawmilled but KR seems to have squibbed it on McClelland and Garrett. It seems the Cabinet is 20 because the intention is to reduce it to 18 if you get my drift.

  561. 561
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Optimist.
    John Hogg, the current Deputy President and Chairman of Committees.

  562. 562
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Glen, you better hope Brenden stays in the top Liberal job, otherwise you’ll be seeing my ugly naked body plastered all over TV LOL

  563. 563
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    555 [anyway Costello would have done the numbers for Julie.]

    Glen, that’s why people are demanding to see the figures. This bloke was Treasurer for almost twelve years and produced rubbery figures repeatedly.

  564. 564
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    LTEP – cheers. And if Price gets the chair, which left faction Senator will be Senate president?

  565. 565
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Senator Gavin Marshall from what I’ve heard.

  566. 566
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    LTEP – ahh yes, forgot about Gavan.
    Cheers again.

  567. 567
    cityblue
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    Ms Bishop received 44 votes, compared to 25 for Mr Robb and 18 for Mr Pyne

  568. 568
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s ministry members that voted for Beasley in 2006:

    Anthony Albanese, Stephen Conroy, Kate Ellis, Craig Emerson, Chris Evans, Martin Ferguson, Duncan Kerr, Joe Ludwig, Jenny Macklin, Tanya Plibersek, Stephen Smith, Wayne Swan, Penny Wong

  569. 569
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    Glen: We will see how the Libs stand on IR once Horatio announces his front bench. If his shadow minister is Andrews, Hockey or even Abbott, then nothing would have changed at all.

  570. 570
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    In other news Senator Eric Abetz has replaced Senator Helen Coonan as Deputy leader of the Libs in the Senate.

  571. 571
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:07 pm | Permalink

    Flash #455,

    Quite right – I think that in line with his technocratic background, Rudd will be more of a supervisor than a frontliner. Just the kind of PM we need to ensure that AWB II doesn’t happen.

    Flash #458,

    My bet on which Labor Minister will stuff-up first is Crean. He’s a total incompetent, and it’s a tribute to his factional backing that he got in at all.

  572. 572
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    LTEP I recall Whitlam could not make the hard decisions about ministry too! As I recall all of them got to be in Cabinet because EGW couldnt bear to deny some.

    Well, the first Whitlam Ministry was 2 people, for a cabinet of 2.

    Whitlam was the first P.M. to designate different roles as inner or outer ministry, with the inner ministry as cabinet.

  573. 573
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    569 [then nothing would have changed at all.]

    It’s the one thing that can be banked on with the Liberals. Even the vote today was a whimpy vote for no change.

  574. 574
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Yes thank you for the smart aleck reference to the duumvirate ShowsOn. I think you will find I am correct on the Cabinet.

  575. 575
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Re 552,

    Adam Says:

    November 29th, 2007 at 2:55 pm
    Speaker will be either Jenkins or Price.

    Is this speculation? Do you know this for fact? If the latter, please tell me your source, thanks :)

  576. 576
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull to be Treasurey spokesman. Bishop IR.

  577. 577
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    IR will be Bishop according to Sky News

  578. 578
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Malcolm shadow treasurer
    Bishop shadow IR

  579. 579
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull shadow treasurer :)

  580. 580
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    Swan will be shaking in his boots lol Turnbull has got a good position ;)

  581. 581
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Swan will be shaking in his boots lol Turnbull has got a good position ;)

    No, Swan is in the government.

    Nelson will be shaking in his boots because Turnbull will be able to take him down after a year.

  582. 582
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    Glen.

    Its Nelson who is shaking in his boots over Turnbull. 2 votes away. :-P

  583. 583
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:15 pm | Permalink

    570 [In other news Senator Eric Abetz has replaced Senator Helen Coonan as Deputy leader of the Libs in the Senate.]

    I thought they lost the election because the Liberals were out of touch. Now they will move out of sight with this great decision. Not a smart move if they have plans of ever being electable in the future. Abetz is a whingy, whiny, sulker who will find it difficult to win the electorate over to his form of moodiness.

  584. 584
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    The inner Cabinet was first created by Menzies in 1956. Whitlam reverted to all Ministers being in Cabinet, but it wasn’t a success and all subsequent governments have had a Cabinet and an outer ministry.

  585. 585
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    true true ruawake ;)

    Nelson lookin good tho, and Nelson will support ratifying Kyoto.

  586. 586
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Thank you for that confirmation Adam.

  587. 587
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    My sauces are confidential. Some are sweet, some are sour, all are piquant.

  588. 588
    Mathew Cole
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:18 pm | Permalink

    Dario #568,

    All that shows is that Rudd is willing to let the past stay in the past.

  589. 589
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    585 [Nelson will support ratifying Kyoto.]

    Why didn’t Nelson do it when he was in Government if it is such a good idea?

  590. 590
    Trubbel at Mill
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Shows On : “Roy & H.G. are going to LOVE Kate Ellis as Minister for Sport!”

    Yes. Hello Boys!

  591. 591
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    Nelson thinks he can go and talk to Rudd about Labor policies, he still thinks he is in Govt. Twit. :)

  592. 592
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull will be the first Shadow Treasurer able to promise that he will abolish taxation and fund the government out of his own pocket.

  593. 593
    sunnyboy
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Whenever I see Julie Bishop, I’m reminded of her relationship with Ross Lightfoot. urggghhhhh

    In his case it really was a gun in his pocket.

    http://www.chaser.com.au/content/view/3286/127/

  594. 594
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    591 [Nelson thinks he can go and talk to Rudd about Labor policies, he still thinks he is in Govt. Twit.]

    Nelson probably thinks his past Union Boss credentials are worth something.

  595. 595
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    Shows On : “Roy & H.G. are going to LOVE Kate Ellis as Minister for Sport!”

    Yes. Hello Boys!

    They wouldn’t shut up about how good Senator Rod Kemp was.

    They hated Senator Brandis. I think they’ll like Kate Ellis for some reason.

  596. 596
    Big Blind Door Knocker
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Brendan already has a fan club and a website

    http://www.nelsonfacts.com/

  597. 597
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    Whenever I see Julie Bishop, I’m reminded of her relationship with Ross Lightfoot. urggghhhhh

    HAHAHHAHAHAHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAH Bishop and Lightfoot? NO WAY!?

  598. 598
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Kate Ellis: she’ll go from the “baby” of the House to the old lady in time.

  599. 599
    Nathan
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Charlie @ 448

    Chris Bowen –
    Assistant Treasurer
    Minister for Revenue and Competition Policy
    Minister for Consumer Affairs

  600. 600
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    Edward St John,

    Considering you said that Lindsay Tanner was not a suitable person to be in government because he has been married 3 times, I eagerly await you condemnation of the Liberal Party for electing as leader a man who has also been married 3 times. Or is it just Labor marriages that are immoral?

  601. 601
    Antonio
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    The theory that McMullan would be speaker seems to have been dashed by the fact that he’s been made a parliamentary secretary. Pity – he would make a good and fair speaker, and being from Canberra, it would work well for him personally too.

  602. 602
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Re 587,

    Adam Says:

    November 29th, 2007 at 3:17 pm
    My sauces are confidential. Some are sweet, some are sour, all are piquant.

    Ok I can understand confidential sources. Until I see it in print, I will assume nothing myself. If you, however, have confidential sources, can you tell me when the public like myself will see the choice in print? thanks :) It obviously isn’t this afternoon :(

  603. 603
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:28 pm | Permalink

    Paul K,

    As the Byzantines ruled, anymore than 3 marriages was regarded as a form of legalised prostitution. So I think that means both of them have used up all of their chances.

  604. 604
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    Antonio, I think Bob is factionally unalligned? If so, no way will he get speaker.

    I think one thing that the ministry list confirms is that there’s no way the factions didn’t play a part in its composition.

  605. 605
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    or is he Centre?

  606. 606
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:30 pm | Permalink

    or just dead meat?

  607. 607
    DroversDog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Another disappointing government in some ways ….. Minister for Transport, Regional Development etc but no Minister for Urban Affairs or Cities….. Both sides of politics seem to be “a-spacial” ….. I suppose because they’re mostly all lawyers (and union bossess :-) )…. …..

  608. 608
    areaman
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    From the looks of it the right did better than the left compared to the shadow ministry.

  609. 609
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    613 Had Nelson not become a Labor rat he probably would have been named Health Minister this afternoon instead of being plunged into the most vulnerable and short-term position in Australia.

  610. 610
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Mr. T will be happy with being shadow treasurer though, next best job, plus he’ll still have a high profile enough to one day challenge if he wants.

  611. 611
    Optimist
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    Making McMullan a Parl Sec is bullsh*t – he’s one of the best minds in the ALP. His experience and intelligence would have been a huge asset, particularly in terms of parliamentary procedure and strategy – bonehead move!

  612. 612
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    Looks like the leaker got plumbed.

  613. 613
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    610 [Mr. T will be happy with being shadow treasurer though, next best job, plus he’ll still have a high profile enough to one day challenge if he wants.]

    Are they queuing up to challenge already ,Glen? That’s what I like about the Tories in opposition so much stability .

  614. 614
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    Is Mr T going to go round 2 with Horatio when it comes time, unlike Cossie?

  615. 615
    wayaway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    What’s the opinion on Stephen Smith? I was hugely unimpressed with him in his early political career (which I took notice of at the time after he became my local member). I haven’t really followed him closely since leaving WA, is he still just a numbers man? How good do people think he’ll go outside the back room??

  616. 616
    wayaway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    With the Labor plant now in charge of the Opposition, does this mean the unions have cemented their hold on political power in this country?? :)

  617. 617
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    wayaway there’s a reason he’s foreign minister, he’s a deadbeat who couldn’t sell the education revolution and now Rudd will be able to run DFAT by himself.

    “When I was Vice-President of the AMA, I was told by the Labor health minister that I should `not bother telling the then government what I thought it ought to do and that, if I wanted to change anything that government was doing, I would have to change the government’. I was then told by his successor that people were `wasting their money having private health insurance’ and that they ought to do what she did. When I inquired what that was, it was to pay cash. There we were representing a million families in Australia earning less than $40,000 a year, half a million people on health care cards and 800,000 pensioners who still made enormous sacrifices to care for themselves and their families, and government wasn’t listening.” – Brendan Nelson Maiden Speech

  618. 618
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    What’s the opinion on Stephen Smith?

    After Downer anyone is a step up. I think Smith is pretty smart and this may be his chance to shine. After Downer’s policy of offending every small nation on earth he’ll be a breath of fresh air.

  619. 619
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    614 [Is Mr T going to go round 2 with Horatio when it comes time, unlike Cossie?]

    Seems like the Liberals have learned the lesson that nobody willing to challenge leads to electoral defeat so they are determined to have challengers coming from the left, right and centre to keep Nelson on his toes.

  620. 620
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Glen, people are wasting their money having private health insurance. Ask anyone who’s had a serious medical condition and they’ll tell you so.

  621. 621
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Howard Hater @ 541

    If Bendan makes it to 2010, I’ll streak naked through Darling Harbour.

    If Brendan makes it to 2010, Darling Harbour will be a nudist colony.

    Incidentally, has the hate subsided? I mean, pretty soon there won’t be much to hate: the sad little creature will be spending his days walled-up in Wollstonecraft, listening to the trots with a crochet blankie over his knee, sipping endless cups of Horlicks and getting increasingly impatient with his wife (who will soon start arriving home ’suspiciously late’ from the bridge club on Tuesday afternoons).

  622. 622
    Petrie is Coming Home
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    388 – The QLD libs have Dr in charge as well and he is a dud.

    Although, it did mean that during the last state election they ran a slogan “Real Doctors not Spin Doctors”.

  623. 623
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    Tollner now behind by just 262 votes.

  624. 624
    wayaway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    I agree Smith has nothing to beat in comparison to Dolly…

  625. 625
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Glen, people are wasting their money having private health insurance. Ask anyone who’s had a serious medical condition and they’ll tell you so

    Sorry to disagree but I’ve got Private Health Insurance (hospital only) and I spent a week in hospital last year. I’m glad I have it.

  626. 626
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Tollner could hang on if the trend continues.

    Pre-polled 53/46 to Tollner and Postals 59/41 to Tollner.

  627. 627
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:44 pm | Permalink

    There we were representing a million families in Australia earning less than $40,000 a year, half a million people on health care cards and 800,000 pensioners who still made enormous sacrifices to care for themselves and their families, and government wasn’t listening.” - Brendan Nelson Maiden Speech

    Interesting, so what does he do? He joins the party that voted against Medicare. What a hypocrite.

  628. 628
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    How history shaped Nelson.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/nelson-unveils-new-liberal-team/2007/11/29/1196037053480.html

  629. 629
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Glen, in ‘04 the provisional votes favoured the ALP 54/46. They haven’t started counting them yet for this election. I think Hale is pretty safe.

  630. 630
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Paul K,

    You are a real Paul arent you? Unless you’ve seen it, felt it, touched it personally you just dont seem to be able to validate an opinion as worthwhile.

  631. 631
    Will
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    Oh god it’s a love fest on the opposition benches:

    When Dr Nelson was asked if he was concerned that Mr Turnbull would be sitting beside him sharpening his knife and waiting to challenge again, Ms Bishop threw her arm around her leader and pointed out that she would be sitting beside him instead.

  632. 632
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    i saw that on Sky it will get a run on the news or at least 7:30, Julie full on grabbed him it was hilarious especially with those eyes.

  633. 633
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:50 pm | Permalink

    Edward St John,

    I love you too.

  634. 634
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    The man who finally admitted we went to Iraq for the Oil elected as Leader of the Liberal Party. Interesting times indeed.

    http://theorstrahyun.blogspot.com/2007/11/liberals-go-for-brendan-we-went-to-iraq.html

  635. 635
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Paul K today is a day for sharing the love.

    What will be next will the Rudd cabinet imitate the Swedes and sauna together? I can just see Faulkner’s specs misting up.

  636. 636
    Burgey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    635 – Wil Ms Ellis in cabinet, I can’t blame his glasses for fogging up.

  637. 637
    Burgey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    636 – (With)

  638. 638
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    The Australian is so in touch with the pulse of Australian politics.

    On Tuesday they ran two opinion pieces. Christopher Pearson endorsing Tony Abbott, and Paul Kelly endorsing Malcolm Turnbull!

  639. 639
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Like magic, factions fall into place

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22842227-5013481,00.html

    So Rudd has overcome factionalism in the ALP, HA think again!

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,22839806-601,00.html

    In the contest for deputy leader, Ms Bishop received 44 votes, compared with 25 for Mr Robb and 18 for Mr Pyne.

  640. 640
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Will Nelson beat Downer’s 8 months as opposition leader?

  641. 641
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    so long as Brendan doesn’t say ‘the things that batter’ as his first policy, yes.

  642. 642
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Like magic, factions fall into place

    That’s better than the Liberals being almost perfectly split down the middle.

  643. 643
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn but if you read the article there is a perfect balance between Left and Right lol.

  644. 644
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    Edward,

    And you think I’m cynical!

  645. 645
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Downer must have backed Brendan by the sounds of things.

  646. 646
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    DroversDog 607

    I agree. There is quite a problem at present with tFederal transport policy that urban public transport is excluded from AusLink funding. So the Feds fund rural railways and highways, urban freeways, but not urban rail or busways. Plus they require the states to contribute funds to the AusLink projects, so most of the State funds as well are tied up in the bigger AusLink projects, usually urban freeways. Only the wealthy State governments (WA and QLD) have the cash spare to fund any new urban public transport.

    A simple solution would be to open AusLink funds to include urban public transport projects. That way they could be funded in a cost neutral way, also helping meet greenhouse targets.

  647. 647
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Can anyone tell me what the Liberal policy on Iraq is now?

    http://blogs.news.com.au/news/blogocracy/index.php/news/comments/nelson_new_liberal_leader

  648. 648
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Point very well made Socrates.

  649. 649
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Can anyone tell me what the Liberal policy on Iraq is now?

    Who cares? it hardly matters.

  650. 650
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn but if you read the article there is a perfect balance between Left and Right lol.

    That’s better than a perfect split between Nelson and Turnbull.

  651. 651
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    649 But now that they have chosen Nelson to lead them into the wilderness I want to know which path they will take.

    http://dailyflute.com/?p=1336

  652. 652
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Surely it’s a given of the science of psephology that Nelson’s wife votes Labor, or even Green?

  653. 653
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Nelson! hehehe.

    Libs being strategic, letting him take the fall in 2010?

    Or Mal just a bit less popular than he’d like?

  654. 654
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    steve @ 647

    Can anyone tell me what the Liberal policy on Iraq is now?

    Redeploy Australia’s troops to the shopping centres of Bennelong.

  655. 655
    stuart
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    have they announced the shadow positions yet? not that it really matters i guess…

  656. 656
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    Lefty E, Malcolm will be better with experience and he’s a good fall back option, but im willing to give Lord Nelson a go. Im just wondering how he’ll fair in approval ratings and preferred PM hmmmm hopefully better than Big Kim when he took over.

  657. 657
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    If the Liberals win in 2010 they will re-invade Iraq.

  658. 658
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Hillary will have surrendered to the terrorists before then Adam.

  659. 659
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Yep. The Union’s domination is complete and total. It has 70% of the Government and 100% of the Coalition leader. Effing hell, that Combe was good!

  660. 660
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    50% of senior Liberal Leadership are Union bosses, then splice in a word play with Nelson saying We’re Coming Back!

  661. 661
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    What a bunch of gutless spivs! Now Jho has got the arse it’s “Kyoto, Kyoto, Kyoto”.

  662. 662
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    Road to Surfdom is rolling around laughing at what the Libs have done today.

    http://www.roadtosurfdom.com/2007/11/29/kiss-me-hardy/

  663. 663
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    @ 657

    By ‘Iraq’ I presume you mean the mortgage belt?

  664. 664
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Kevon Rudd must me laughing to himself at the Libs having voted for Brendan Nelson. Couldn’t ask for better.
    I thought that Malcolm Turnbull made the right noises in defeat but told a fib-”we’ll go on to win in 2010″ or words to that effect. He knows there is no chance of the Coalition winning with Brendan Nelson.
    Well, he will have to wait another year or eighteen months before he takes over.
    He’ll make his move when the polls show Brendan Nelson scraping along the bottom.
    There are probably a few in the party who think that Malcolm Turnbull is far too modern to take over. He has such 21st century ideas. Tut,tut.

  665. 665
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:19 pm | Permalink

    Maybe we could have the Chaser team dress up as Tony Abbott, terrifying coalition backbenchers entering caucus meetings by ranting to journalists present about his leadership ambitions. Maybe the Chaser team could run for the Liberal leadership. Or impersonate them. They nearly got away with impersonating Canadian leaders, how hard can it be to impersonate a Liberal leader? Would they make it into parliament?

  666. 666
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Richard Jones, how many people said the day Rudd was elected leader of the ALP that he would win the 07 election not many?? We’re allowed to take a punt on Lord Nelson as you did with KR.

  667. 667
    scaper...
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    Is there a chance in the future of Turnbull and his supporters breaking away from the religious right to form a new political force???

  668. 668
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:23 pm | Permalink

    667 [Richard Jones, how many people said the day Rudd was elected leader of the ALP that he would win the 07 election not many??]

    Pretty much everybody except a couple of Tory trolls.

  669. 669
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    Oh that darling blowhard of the Howardista, Miranda Devine:

    “However Nelson, who commands the respect of the military for his clear intellect, discipline and compassion, and who has long courted the back bench, is not a man to be underestimated. Late last night his numbers were holding strong.”

    I nearly choked on my Bollinger!

    As Dame Leonie Kramer put it soooo succintly:

    “Once you start aspiring you never stop”

  670. 670
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    The great hope of the Libs “The Doc” and “Chucky Eyes”………….hahahahahahahahaha

  671. 671
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    Wilkie only 132 behind.

  672. 672
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:27 pm | Permalink

    Well Glen I didn’t make a punt on KR except an online bet when the betting favoured the Coalition plus an online bet as soon as the betting opened on Justine Elliott keeping her seat. I can buy a thousand rainforest trees with the proceeds. I’m going to the nursery tomorrow.
    Glen I have never voted Labor in my life. I have voted Conservative in the UK for Peter Rawlinson, voted Australia Party, Democrats, independent and Greens but never Labor or Liberal. Nevertheless my preferences go to the people I consider doing the best for the environment and then the economy.
    Punt on Lord Nelson, former Labor party supporter, if you like but I am saying it’s not one I’d put my money on to win. I regard Malcolm Turnbull an ideal leader for the Liberals at a time like this and a potential winner. He did have a swing towards him after all.

  673. 673
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:28 pm | Permalink

    Even Latham ran rings around Nelson in question time so what hope do the Libs have of not embarrassing themselves.

  674. 674
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Gotta agree with Steve. As soon as Kevin took over there was widespread approval, not only among Labor supporters, but the general community (as the polls immediate march north clearly showed). I doubt we’ll see that with Nelson. Half his party don’t even want him and those that voted for him did so out of loathing for the alternative rather than confidence in Brendan.

  675. 675
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Nelson’s legitimacy is questionable at 45-42. Now there are 7 or 8 too close to call seats. What happens if Lib wins 4 and they are all Turnbull supporters. Be worried, be very very worried, Nelson.

  676. 676
    Rates Analyst
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    What of the Senators? Which ones voted – anybody know?

    Cause there’s a few of those changing next year, too.

  677. 677
    bryce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:31 pm | Permalink

    SK – Why wait till 2010?
    When talking about “wrecking the place” you could try talking them into denying supply while you have the chance.

  678. 678
    Lefty E
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    We enjoy your pain, you know, Steven Kaye. :)

  679. 679
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Even Latham ran rings around Nelson in question time so what hope do the Libs have of not embarrassing themselves.

    To be fair, Turnbull is pretty hopeless in question time, so that wouldn’t make much of a difference.

  680. 680
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Regarding Nelson, I don’t have as much against him as some of the other Howard Ministers, and he does not have baggage like AWB or Haneef hanging over him. But does he have other risks? Despite Miranda Devine’s objective (as always) assessment of his capability, is there a risk of embarassement from Nelson in the Super Hornet air force tender saga or previous incidents? I never saw the Four Corners show, but I gather that many people think they are an expensive waste of our money. Also, what about the Jake Kovco fiasco, where I recall Nelson seemed to make some public statements that were quite unfortunate?

  681. 681
    wayaway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    I thought Turnbull needed to show he wanted the leadership, but would be entirely happy not to have it at the moment – let someone else do the public heavy lifting…

  682. 682
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink

    You’d have to say that cronyism and factionalism still reign. The non-inclusion of McMullan is a disgrace when places are found for the likes of Ludwig, Fitzgibbon, Snowden and Debus.

  683. 683
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    Glen before you tell us that Nelson being Howard’s successor was not predicted. Read this from 25 January 2006.

    http://dailyflute.com/?p=1337

  684. 684
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Steve I said Nelson would get it because he has the most party support and he did.

    Anyway ever since he got into Parliament people touted him as a future leader, they were right.

  685. 685
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Lefty E, it’s the country I’m worried about it. But I wouldn’t expect you to understand, being a leftie. Your species isn’t particularly known for its patriotism.

    Nice to see Garrett demoted. Also good to see that Krudd has finally admitted he’s Wong about climate change!

  686. 686
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    On the first day of Parliament, Nelson should drive his Motorbike to Parliament House :) hey if Rudd can do stunts so can Lord Nelson!

  687. 687
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    “Super Hornets” Nelson does carry political baggage.

    Super Hornets: $6 billion worth of obsolete taxpayer-funded garbage.

  688. 688
    bryce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    45 votes to 42 sounds only just a bit better than a half-Nelson.
    But what sort of a hold has the Christian Right?

  689. 689
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    about 5-10 votes out of 87, don’t believe what the Labor trolls tell you about the influence of the Christian Right in the Liberal Party.

  690. 690
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    685 [Anyway ever since he got into Parliament people touted him as a future leader, they were right.]

    Now that everyone is touting Nelson as a short term leader, are they right?

  691. 691
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    Garrett demoted? He is in cabinet. The Honourable Nude Nut thank you SK. :-P

  692. 692
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think every media person has said that Steve, so i don’t consider it valid.

  693. 693
    Pancho
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Glen – “On the first day of Parliament, Nelson should drive his Motorbike to Parliament House :) hey if Rudd can do stunts so can Lord Nelson!”

    Oh how I hope he does. He should bring his white strat in as well and start riffing to god save the queen.

  694. 694
    10pse
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    just as an aside… Labor’s TPP vote as fallen below 53%… down to 52.99% and falling

  695. 695
    Matt D
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:48 pm | Permalink

    I was wondering how Steven Kaye would cope with a loss given his continual blithe confidence of a win.

    Stop to lick his wounds?, to re-assess?, to wonder why his view of the world is not shared by the majority of his countrymen?

    Nope. Sails on as unreflective as ever. Shame, it could have been a learning experience for him.

    PS: Belinda Neal getting slaughtered on postals in Robertson.

  696. 696
    frank frederic
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    oh NOOOOOOOO….
    Howard craws back in Bennelong
    2061 votes difference,
    85.74% votes counted,
    13,911 votes not yet counted.
    Howard 48.69% — McKew 51.31%

  697. 697
    Dinkum
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:50 pm | Permalink

    Bennelong has recently been updated on the AEC website.

  698. 698
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    Whats the latest in Robertson Matt D?

  699. 699
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    LOL how funny would it be if Howie won his seat LOL it wont happen but still!

  700. 700
    Yoyoma
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    Yes, with the TPP just dropping now below 53%, what do people think will happen over the next week? Is it likely to start increasing again as more absentee votes are counted?

    I just hope it pops over 53% again as I had some money on it being between 53% and 53.99%.

  701. 701
    Matthew Sykes
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:53 pm | Permalink

    791 vote ALP lead in Robertson.

  702. 702
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

    686 Stephen Kaye
    “Lefty E, it’s the country I’m worried about it. But I wouldn’t expect you to understand, being a leftie. Your species isn’t particularly known for its patriotism.”

    Yes Lefty E, shame on you! All you left-wingers care about is the environment, education, a decent health system, sustainable long term growth, and an equitable distribution of financial rewards. How will that make Australia a better place? At least Stephen Kaye is fighting so that struggling millionaire Liberals can keep their rightful place as Our Masters. What would you have them do – get normal jobs so that they can make a meaningful contribution to society? Outrageous! You do not respect the Natural Order of Things.

    PS Lefty E, how do I become an honory member of your species?

  703. 703
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    I think Rudd should really mess with the Liberal’s heads and finally let
    Bronwyn Bishop be speaker.

  704. 704
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Sorry I can’t help it.

    Brendan Nelson as Liberal Leader – Ba Ha Ha Ha HA ha burp. :-P

  705. 705
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    Well laugh all you like but Nelson doesn’t eat his own ear wax unlike KR ruawake lol bahahahahah!

  706. 706
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    #695 -

    “just as an aside… Labor’s TPP vote as fallen below 53%… down to 52.99% and falling”

    Their primary’s dropping, too. The poor little mongs can’t even get a landslide right.

  707. 707
    Marvelous Marvin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 587

    Maybe after he drives his motorbike to Parliament House, he can ride his car there too.

  708. 708
    Yoyoma
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:10 pm | Permalink

    haha the TPP has just gone back up to 53%. Wonder if we’ll see it oscillating around over the next few days – or is it likely to keep increasing now that the AEC is finally counting the absentee votes?

  709. 709
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    13,911 votes not yet counted

    Only around 8,000 votes left to count in Bennelong now, with Maxine in front by 2,500. Howard is only getting a 55% split from postals, and less from Abesntee and Pre-polls. At that rate there’s nowhere near enough votes left to make up even half that lead.

  710. 710
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    707 Steven Kaye – Ah, Steve nice to see you are taking the loss to heart. A loss is a loss old son, enjoy!

  711. 711
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    Gee Steven Kaye… now you’ve used the word ‘mong’… anything else you want to spring on us?

    No way Howard will win Bennelong with postals breaking like that. He’d have a chance if it was 10% higher.

  712. 712
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    The only thing Brendan Nelson cares about is Brendan Nelson – he is the original “celebrity candidate”.

    He has the charisma of a paddle pop stick and the spine of a bluebottle. Lets see what the parliamentary secretary for defence procurement discovers.

    Did Andrew Peacock offer Nelson a job at Boeing?

  713. 713
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    LTEP, more to the point would Howard want to win Bennelong?

  714. 714
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Crikey has this apology from the GG

    http://www.crikey.com.au/Media/images/071128-Aus-Corrx-600px-2-e3fe0fef-b111-4764-905e-52f70e8e248b.jpg

  715. 715
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Glen 706
    I have never eaten earwax. I smoked it but never inhaled it.

  716. 716
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Well, I got my wish – Nelson as leader of the Libs. How they expect to win with him is beyond me.

  717. 717
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Well Glen, it depends whether he wants in his legacy to be the Prime Minister that lost his seat. I doubt it. I guess he doesn’t really care but it really would be a smear on his record.

    I’m willing to predict Labor will hang on in Solomon, probably in Corangamite and Flynn and cling on in Bowman and Robertson. Total seat count 83-85 seats.

  718. 718
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Well, I got my wish - Nelson as leader of the Libs. How they expect to win with him is beyond me

    I don’t think they do Gary

  719. 719
    Derek Corbett
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Hello William! Thanks for your good works. Hello Poll Bludgers!

    Been up-country doing things away from most civilisation.

    Brendan Nelson! My god, I’m scared. If he comes at me armed with his wet tram ticket, I’ll run … true dinks! He is so scary. He’s a good friend of Karmahl …

  720. 720
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Sorry… 82-84 seats.

  721. 721
    MayoFeral
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Oh, God. Stephen Smith in Foreign Affairs?

    Even if Smith was catatonic he’d still be a better FM than Lord Downer. At least he wouldn’t bear great responsibility for the destruction of one country, East Timor, or some responsible for bringing another, Iraq, to the brink of disaster with perhaps 1 million dead and 4 million dispossessed, and creating the world’s biggest terrorist training camp. Nor do I believe Smith would ever be implicated in what was, at best, gross, perhaps criminal, incompetence, and at worst, treason.

    Oh that darling blowhard of the Howardista, Miranda Devine:

    “However Nelson, who commands the respect of the military for his clear intellect, discipline and compassion,

    Whatever little respect Nelson still had among the top ranks of the ADF was blown the day the CDF and CAF found out at a press conference that he had ordered $6,000,000,000 worth of aircraft the RAAF does not need and had not asked for.

    IMO, this is potentially an even greater scandal than AWB. Was he panicked into buying the Super Hornets by the maker’s (and F-111 maintainance contractors) sales rep, the former Liberal MP Andrew Peacock, or is it even more sinister?

    Either way, I want my ~$300 share back, and from Nelson’s wallet, not the public purse!

  722. 722
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Labor lead in Herbert up to 33 votes – I suspect Lindsay will win, especially if there are more nasty postal votes to come.

  723. 723
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye has been put in the moderation bin for his ugly misogynistic attack on Julia Gillard. I would much prefer it if he stopped coming here.

  724. 724
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Howard Hater, there are about 2000 more postals at least to come in Herbert.
    http://vtr.aec.gov.au/HouseDivisionDecScrutinyProgress-13745-165.htm

  725. 725
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    LTEP: Robertson seems safe for Labor now. I agree with you on Solomon and Flynn, Bowman looks possible, Herbert seems unlikely(even with a miniscule Labor lead), and forget the rest, even the mythical 3000 missing votes in McEwen.
    So I’ll say 83 or 84 seats for Labor

  726. 726
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    And I forgot Corrangamite, which I’ll add on to the 80 confirmed Labor seats.
    So my prediction is 84 Labor seats(counting Bowman or Herbert)

  727. 727
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    William, not SK if he goes all i have is ESJ and John of Melbourne???
    Im sure he got banned for a reason though.

    2000 more sweet Lindsay has a chance…

  728. 728
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye, what are you still doing here? You’ve got nothing concrete to add to the board, only insults.

  729. 729
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:37 pm | Permalink

    Hey when are we going to get a Liberals in Power doco?

  730. 730
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    Glen, my money would be on Lindsay. I don’t understand why Herbert didn’t swing so much to Labor as other coastal QLD seats – Lindsay is that good a local member?

  731. 731
    Derek Corbett
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Sorry if this has been covered before, but what is Maxine doing in Bennelong? Is she being nice and allowing Howard to concede or just being sure of the numbers? I want it finally done and dusted.

  732. 732
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    729 Hey when are we going to get a Liberals in Power doco?

    2025

  733. 733
    Maurico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Well hello again fellow bludgers.

    My prediction on 85 seats 53/47 wasn’t too shabby after all….

    ps: I was very pleased to see “50’s throwback” Brendan Nelson get the gig. Looking forward to increasing the ALP majority in 2010.

  734. 734
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    Ill take a loss in Bowman HH if Dickson remains ours, though i feel sorry for Laming after all he was cleared and before that had happened he was touted as an up and comer. But thems the breaks. Still i wonder how many postals are yet to be counted for Herbert and Bowman, i think Flynn and Corangamite and Solomon look likely for Labor though Tollner is doing well on postals so that could come close.

  735. 735
    Boerwar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Greetings all.
    I’ll give myself a small pat on the back for correctly tipping Nelson/Bishop. Someone, several hundred posts ago, perhaps in another thread, asked why Abbott put his name up when he knew he was going to lose. Now we know. He has, at least for this round, established himself as the kingmaker. And he has put down a marker.
    The new team is a good outcome for the libs. It saves the one real hope, Turnbull, from himself. Perhaps he will take a major bit of learning from this – that he needs to build a party constituency. If he gets that right he will also have learned a bit about team work along the way.
    Meanwhile Nelson and Bishop are both very hard workers. They will absorb punishment and tend to the organisational gardening.
    But Abetz and Truss? Panache personified!

  736. 736
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    It is indeed regrettable Glen, and I wish to God there were more conservatives here like you and ESJ. Unfortunately, so many of them have been in the mould of Snoopy, Cerdic Conan and Steven Kaye: ugly, nasty, spiteful and utterly lacking in any semblance of humour or goodwill. Yes, there have been creeps from the left as well, but there’s no escaping the fact that their proportion on this website is much lower. I repeat the words of George Megalogenis from Insiders on Sunday, because they are bang on the money:

    The Liberal Party needs to have a good hard look at its membership base. This wasn’t just Lindsay, we saw a breakout at the Press Club on Thursday where Liberal Party members were heckling female journalists including Michelle Grattan, I think there was a meanness of spirit in the Liberal Party this year that came from its grass roots. I don’t know what it’s about, but Peter Costello (sic) needs to have a good look at it.

  737. 737
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    Is it true that Turbull’s middle name is….Bligh?? “Lord Nelson…Captain Bligh is behind you!”

  738. 738
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:46 pm | Permalink

    “…for his ugly misogynistic attack on Julia Gillard.”

    It’s a bit rough to ban someone for being misogynistic when he doesn’t even know what it means.

  739. 739
    Darn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:47 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye (706) The landslide will be completed at the next election. Plenty more marginals for the ALP to grab.

  740. 740
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Yes the Liberal leadership voting numbers can be easily explained. Its not the Senators – the difference between the 87 votes cast and the 59 Liberal MPs is obviously the entire Rudd front bench voting en block for Nelson :)

  741. 741
    Bakunin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    I see http://www.nelsonfacts.com is up already. Obviously they had http://www.turnbullfacts.com ready to go just in case, as trying to access pops up an authentication dialogue box for access to area “ALP Private Page”. Nothing up on his defense spend-a-thon, perhaps they are saving that until parliament sits in Feb?

  742. 742
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    What is funny is that you trash us choosing Nelson but if we chose Turnbull, you’d then say we’ve wasted the only good shot we had.

  743. 743
    Steven Kaye
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Now how in the world can I be misogynistic towards Godzillard? Misogyny can only be directed at women!

  744. 744
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:51 pm | Permalink

    Glen – I agree. Nelson is probably best case. he can east the s*** sandwich before Turnbull takes over.

  745. 745
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Relax Glen, we were going to trash you regardless of who you chose….you know that!

  746. 746
    BK
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye 743,

    Why don’t you just retire to your cubicle with your dog-eared magazines.

  747. 747
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    William, you better ban Bill Heffernan too …

  748. 748
    Boerwar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Glen
    I am not trashing the libs for choosing Nelson. I think it was the right choice in the circumstances. Bishop is a no-brainer because she it the pipe to the WA money plus you get an energetic and very determined person to go with it. It doesn’t really have much to do with his qualities or Bishop’s qualities, or their views for that matter. It has more to do with what is likely to happen to them in the next little while. As I said, they will absorb punishment, carry out a bit attrition in the Senate and, with a bit of imagination, carry out some desperately needed organisational renewal. If the polls support them, well and good. If not, Turnbull is a fresh brand.

  749. 749
    Paul K
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    You should be used to being trashed by now considering you barrack for Melbourne.

  750. 750
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    Steven Kaye: keep on digging that grave mate!

  751. 751
    Graeme
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    So Julia Gillard is the new Russ Hinze, Min for Everything.

    (Nb i’m not being ugly or misogynistic, even if Big Russ was that and more!)

    It will be fascinating to follow her already quite stellar career. People seem so polarised by her: and not necessarily on party/ideological lines. Personal I think both poles over-estimate her. She’s not haridan, nor saviour, not a bogan nor a Godiva. Just a fair political operator, with a decent heart but a huge ambition, like 75% of those who enter politics.

  752. 752
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    Libs big movement since Sat night

    approx 5% of the total vote has been counted ( 677,187 2PP votes counted)
    LCP have gained 2PP 53.20% of these votes to Labors 46.80%

    which has caused Labors 2PP to drop from 53.41% to 52.99%
    and the swing to drop from 6.15% to 5.73 %

    THIS MOVEMENT IS ON ONLY 5% of the total vote since counted
    there is another 19.23% to count

  753. 753
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 5:59 pm | Permalink

    A helpful suggestion for Nelson and Turnbull:

    Given the divisions in the Liberal Party over several issues, I have a fair and democratic sugegstion for how Labor can exploit, oops, I mean handle, the problem sensitively. For the key pieces of legislation that deal with the difficult issues, particularly Climate Change and WorkChoices, introduce the bills granting members a conscience vote. So if any Labor members want to vote against a bill to ratify the Kyoto protocol they can. Similarly, if Malcom Turnbull and Brendan Nelson want to vote in different ways on Kyoto, they can. I think we can be confident that Labor’s legislation will still pass. For the Libs, it should help clarify things.

    With the demise of the Rodent, we need a new nick-name for the Liberals. Instead of calling them Team Rodent, lets change their name to “Team Unity”.

  754. 754
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    “ugly, nasty, spiteful and utterly lacking in any semblance of humour or goodwill.”
    Well, I’m certainly ugly, and I’m also nasty and spiteful, and I’m utterly lacking in goodwill when it comes to Liberals. So I guess it’s only my feeble attempts at humour that save me from William’s bin.

  755. 755
    scaper...
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    The Liberal party has no credibility because of their actions and this is not good for democracy!

    There needs to be a viable alternative for the people at the next election or Rudd will just be the same as Howard in the next decade….meanwhile Rome burns…..

  756. 756
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:03 pm | Permalink

    Christ who is doing the counting? Jack Newton?

  757. 757
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    Big, big thanks to Mr Bowe for his grand efforts over the past few months. I’ve never been so well informed (or entertained!)

    You da man, William!

  758. 758
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Did anyone collect on the 6-1 odds for Brendan Nelson? Curious minds want to know lol ……

  759. 759
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    Wow, in Ron Brown, we have found someone even more alarmist than LTEP… :-)

  760. 760
    Vote1Maxine
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    #723 William Bowe “Steven Kaye has been put in the moderation bin for his ugly misogynistic attack on Julia Gillard. I would much prefer it if he stopped coming here.”

    Hear, hear. I come to this blog to be informed. To follow well reasoned political arguements whether they be of the right or the left or even the centre. I don’t want to read irrelevant crap.

    So Steven Kaye let put this as politely as possible. F*ck off you moronic w*nker.

  761. 761
    Bakunin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    looks like the ALP covered all the bases as they have registered:
    abbottfacts.com
    bishopfacts.com
    turbullfacts.com
    nelsonfacts.com

    guess that they have all the potential leadership scare campaigns covered for the next few months anyway ;)

  762. 762
    Noocat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    I have to admit that I thought the Libs would have chosen Turnbull as leader. But this was based on them doing what was the most sensible thing to do for their better interests.

    I should have known better. As has been the case ever since 2004, the Liberals have developed a knack for sabotaging their electoral prospects.

  763. 763
    Howard Hater
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Ron Brown is even more deluded than Nostrodamus and Steven Kaye LOL

  764. 764
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    Quit while you’re ahead, Vote1Maxine. Julie, I collected $150 from the 6-1 on Nelson, and am mortified to discover it could have been 9-1 if I’d gone with Betfair. Noocat, you’ve hit on something there: punters assumed the Liberals would behave sensibly. Now they know better.

  765. 765
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    Good on you William ;-) I have never put political bets on ever before, prior to this election and after making only $11 on the deal [5 individual seat bets], I will stick to AFL betting exclusively for awhile ;-)

  766. 766
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    Btw, have those missing votes in McEwen been counted yet?

  767. 767
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    I’ll stick to Rio Tinto. :-P

  768. 768
    Julie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    I think the reason Nelson was chosen was much more practical and common sense than most would think. The Libs still haven’t figured out and/or came to terms with “why” they lost the election. Clinging to the policies which got them voted OUT isn’t going to cut it in the long term. Turnbull laid his cards on the table and said he was for signing Kyoto and for saying “Sorry” (for starters). Correct me if I am wrong, but I don’t believe Nelson laid his cards on the table at all or if he did, he was much more circumspect about it than Turnbull. Seems to me that a party which still wants to cling to the remnants of the Howard era for now chose the leader who was more conservative and/or less radical on policies. So using the maxim that “less is more” Nelson got himself elected to the job.

  769. 769
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:20 pm | Permalink

    Glen 727,

    Radio Berlin (EStJ) is going off the air at midnight on Saturday, I guess that makes you a werewolf?

    Cheers,

    EStJ

  770. 770
    Deano
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    Petro Georgio would have been the best bet. Wasn’t “must have spine” on the job description?

  771. 771
    Fagin
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Julie,

    I was lucky enough to get $20 on Nelson shortly before Sportingbet suspended betting at around 10am: easiest $100 I have ever made!

    Thanks for the tip, Mr Bowe!

  772. 772
    Graeme
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Nelson wasn’t my fave education minister, and his tacking to the centre-right of his party rivals Gillard’s transformation.

    But I feel a bit sorry for him.

    A mere 3 vote majority in his caucus, the bulk of his support surely coming from hard conservative resisters of change, and that slim majority explicable because some would simply want Turnbull to prove himself in Parliament a little longer and to be kept powder dry for after the next election.

    Nelson’ll have a privately resourced, articulate rival Turnbull down his neck from early in the life of the new Parliament, in a position to bring on a spill whenever it suits him.

  773. 773
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:23 pm | Permalink

    Full Nelson is NOT electable. He is the current version of Bill Sneden. Now we all know what happened to Bill Sneden!! At least we know he (BS that is) died very very happy.

  774. 774
    Helen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    Well!

    761
    The Age has an article and link to http://www.nelsonfacts.com

    Someone’s been doing their homework!!

  775. 775
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    Ron Brown, you’re assuming the total will be 100%… it won’t be. Haven’t we gone over this a few times?

  776. 776
    KT
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Someone’s been doing their homework!!

    The ALP campaign machine rolls on… ;)

  777. 777
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    Given the vote I think he is the Half Nelson. :)

  778. 778
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    KT, yu are pathetic and get back to work!!!

  779. 779
    KT
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    The Finnigans, my AWA stipulates I can have a break at 6:30 pm after ten hours of hard labour.

  780. 780
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

    KT, AWA? WTF, AWA is kaput!!

  781. 781
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Ron – The AEC’s final “Turnout” figures end up in the low-to-mid 90’s, typically. CHeck 2004’s VTR here: http://results.aec.gov.au/12246/results/HouseResultsMenu-12246.htm

  782. 782
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    Flynn: can we expect all the postals to be returned? Judging by Hinkler in 2004 the total of declaration, absent and pre-poll should be slightly weaker for Labor than their booth vote which should be enough to keep Labor ahead.

  783. 783
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    $777, OK half Nelson. He is my local member. Since there has been a big swing to ABC according to Kerry, do you think Juanita Phillips would be interested in the next election to do a McKew here at Bradfield?

  784. 784
    Derek Corbett
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    Glen. I admire your guts in sticking to your cause. This will be a long, hard road for you and your ilk. I wish you all the best in bringing the Liberal
    Party back into the real world. We need an effective Opposition but I trust you will forgive me if I snigger at the appointment of B. Nelson.

    In the conservation of 1880s sandstock brickwork it is common to use a “sacrificial” lime mortar mix. This will break down over the seasons and will require constant monitoring and renewal. There is a tendency to “re-point” the structure with modern products, which generally has the effect of undermining the intregrity of the structure. It appears to me on preliminary observations, that your structure has undergone inappropriate renovations using stong concrete. The structure is badly damaged, Glen. Raze it and re-build.

    Cheers, Derek

  785. 785
    Darn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    William says (736)

    “It is indeed regrettable Glen, and I wish to God there were more conservatives here like you and ESJ. Unfortunately, so many of them have been in the mould of Snoopy, Cerdic Conan and Steven Kaye: ugly, nasty, spiteful and utterly lacking in any semblance of humour or goodwill”.

    William, you could also have included the lovely Isabella, who always seems intent on spewing out as much invective as she can.

  786. 786
    Emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:02 pm | Permalink

    As odd as it looks to those of us on the outside Nelson had the advantage of courting the backbenches over several years, a skill that Malcolm has not mastered and I bet that was the decisive factor (I did bet too – sadly not 9:1 – I think at 4.75!). It will be interesting to see how the rest of the shadow portfolios are allocated, some obvious starters from the moderate camp (eg Marise Payne) might still get outplayed by the old boys yet. On another topic, I know Kalgoorlie was mistakenly called early on the ABC, but that swing to Sharon Thiel looks very impressive I reckon considering the rest of WA – was she a better performer for the ALP or were there more factors at play? Was Jon Ford involved in the campaign any WA folk?

  787. 787
    Trubbel at Mill
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Further to Derek 784;

    Yes Glen, you and your elk will have to work your asses off if you want to get anything above the donkey vote in 2011. All you Libs will have to pony up more resources and talk yourselves hoarse, cosying up to the media hacks and nagging business constantly for donations, or its off to the glue factory with the lot of you!

    Already your party room has started to buck against the need to reign in the rightwingers by putting nelson and Bishop in the saddle – Lightfoot used to refer to Bishop as ‘a great ride’, but I don’t think he was talking about her sulky. Nay, it was after inspecting her crop back in 2003…

  788. 788
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    William, or other psephs, am I reading the AEC’s returns on Bennelong correctly to mean just about everything that needs to be counted, has been counted?

  789. 789
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:30 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, specifically the scrutineer vote declaration bit, where it looked like there were only c. 3,000 still uncounted.

  790. 790
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    Well Glen its not going to be easy. SBS and ABC news both featured stock footage of an angry young Brendan Nelson (while still a Labor member) saying that he had always voted Labor. A gem.

    Still, Nelson is on the 7.30 report right now and sounding human and intelligent. If he can stop the fighting and prevent the Liberal vote going backwards in the next term he will have done a pretty good job. He is sensibly letting some of O’Brien’s tougher questions go through to the keeper.

  791. 791
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:47 pm | Permalink

    Amazing how high the informal vote is in Bennelong is. I guess some wouldn’t vote for Howard but could not bring themselves to vote Labor either.

  792. 792
    Scott
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    YAY! I took and punk and put 30 bucks on Nelson to win….Turned into $150..awesome…Makes the victory even better…Libs have no hope!

  793. 793
    Enjaybee
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    For those of you who are wondering hown many postal votes, absent and provisional votes remain to be counted have a look at the last election results. As a rough rule of thumb the total for each class of vote is the same from election to election. In other words if there were 8000 postal votes last election expext much the same this time and the same goes for absent and provisionals.

  794. 794
    Andrew
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:54 pm | Permalink

    ron brown, do you realise how PATHETIC you sound. Guess what, the elections OVER, your side LOST.

  795. 795
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    Watching Nelson on the 7:30 Report. Can I just say to the Liberal Party, “Thank You”. Rudd could not have expected a house warming present of such magnitude.

  796. 796
    GS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Lord Nelson on 7.30 Report just regurgitating the same old lines showing this lot will need those next couple of terms (only that if they’re lucky) in the wilderness to demonstrate a capacity to learn. Getting ready to hold the line on serfchoices and ‘not my fault so I’m not saying sorry’…..enjoy those couple of years before Malcolm gets the knife out Bren.

  797. 797
    VoterBoy of Over the Water
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    “790
    Socrates Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 7:41 pm
    Well Glen its not going to be easy. SBS and ABC news both featured stock footage of an angry young Brendan Nelson (while still a Labor member) saying that he had always voted Labor. A gem.”

    That’s not the one where he shouts ‘We’re coming back!’ is it?

  798. 798
    GS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    worst freakin Defence Minister in many a govt BTW…

  799. 799
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    The Queensland Liberal Party State Council meets in about half an Hour to try to sort out the mess created by the Santoro faction bunging on a leadership spill without having the numbers. This is despite assurances for months that they did have the numbers for a challenge.

    According to them it was just a matter of get the Federal Election out of the way and the coup was on. Something weird has happened and the numbers are not there, so they are back to a four all split. Scarily similar to how even the Federal Liberal Party divided behind Nelson today.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/liberals-hands-are-tied-flegg/2007/11/29/1196037059023.html

  800. 800
    clean
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    Nelson on with Kerry at the moment. White noise.

  801. 801
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:10 pm | Permalink

    It didn’t take the ALP long (mind you it’s a bit of a rehash of what they had for all Cabinet Ministers during the campaign)
    http://www.nelsonfacts.com/

  802. 802
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Nelson and Kerry. ZZZZ. Yep. Recall Parliament. Let the Games Begin!

  803. 803
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    When “Top Gun” Nelson was on all I could think about was where did I put that razor?

  804. 804
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Do you reckon all those who just voted Labor, Greens etc are likely to be enticed to Liberals, by Nelson’s offer too good to refuse?

    What, years of vote me?

  805. 805
    PaulofKotara
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Did the great gazzoo really say that he had a photo of Neville Bonner on his office wall as large as two doorways.

  806. 806
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Really this leadership contest for the Libs was a contest that no one wanted to win. Its like a stationary bike race: The person that can stay still and upright the longest wins.

    The result leaves everyone disappointed.
    1. Nelson gets elected with a bare majority. Would be clearly underwhelmed by the show of support.
    2. Turnbull is snubbed but has a substantial base of support in the Party. Still sees a glimmer down the track.
    3. Abbott can sit and wait for the right moment to strike.
    4. Bishop as deputy will garner support from WA, but where else. Money in WA, votes on the eastern seaboard.

    I would not be surprised if Turnbull and Nelson voted for each other.

  807. 807
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Wonder if that includes a commitment to tell us the policies.

    Before or after an election?

  808. 808
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    805. Yes, and yes that means that the Liberal Party is therefore the only party that can lay claim to caring about Indigenous Affairs.

    Remember if you’re not with the Liberal Party on this then obviously you have no heart. Because of course the Libs have such a history of getting things right on Indigenous Affairs that this “planned on the back of an envelope, rush in first worry about the consequences later, ignore most of the recommendation of the Children are sacred report” intervention must be the only way to do things.

  809. 809
    DOGS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:23 pm | Permalink

    I thought Nelson was still out of the country after his balls up on Iraq,Howard must have let back in to vote last Saturday.

  810. 810
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:25 pm | Permalink

    For those who don’t know the detail of ‘the Super Hornet Mess’ from Nelson as Defence Minister.

    The Super Hornet debacle perpetuated by Brendan Nelson when he was defence minister gives good insight into how he would govern. It would be executive whim, without deliberation or oversight. In other words Schmittian conservatism.

    http://www.southsearepublic.org/article/1062/read/the_super_hornet_mess

  811. 811
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:26 pm | Permalink

    That was funny, seeing Shrek having to walk to the carpark, carrying his green plastic trash bag. No more briefcases, laptops, chauffeurs, cameras.

    Not even the Chasers,when you need them.

    Welcome back to AWA world. Battlers. Traffic. Meaningless employment, just to pay the mortgage.

  812. 812
    red wombat
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    I bet Richard Pratt has already got an apology from the Libs.

  813. 813
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Nelson is not a winner, just looking at him makes you cringe.
    He has an unattractive face, and less alone makes you not want to listen to him. He looks shifty and unbelievable.
    The Libs have a number of problems within their ranks, undoubtedly the WA Libs are having a significant say, along with the right and the moderates are trying to play of each group to gain their confidence.
    On saying sorry Nelson struggled with the question and it seems as Kerry said this helped him win.
    Turnbull as Treasurer is a good choice but it may also count against him on his progressive believes.
    Labor’ cabinet looks okay but i question the significant workload of Gillard. Not disputing she has the intelligence and competence but the workload could be a bit much for a party wishing to make a difference in these areas, easily to make mistakes with such a workload. Is it possible Rudd fears her and is hoping she does make some errors, nonetheless she may do the opposite and show herself as a possible future leader.

  814. 814
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    I wonder if once Gillard gets the anti-workchoice Bill through she will dump that portfolio and concentrate on Education?

    I just love that Bishop is to be IR shadow.

    Bishop couldn’t even beat Smith!

    She was such a great Education Minister that the slogan “Education revolution” was even being used by Howard!

    I know all the young Libs get all excited by her, but c’mon, if you really think she was a good performer, explain to me why Rudd was able to sell himself as the education PM?

  815. 815
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    OK, I tipped Nelson/Bishop too:)

    Nelson was best bet, as ’sacrifice’ in the ‘death seat’. If he does well, hey? a Bonus! If he does poorly, no harm done to the Party.

    Only “pork” I ever got out of that govt was betting on their downfall! *chuckle*
    Tho am still waiting for my last bets on Corangamite and Solomon to be finalised…*sigh*

    But for info: big disappointment whinge around Canberra :(

    None of the ACT MPs got Rudd portfolios

    Geography I guess, pity to be forced to waste super-safe Labor seats on back-benchers, but if it was otherwise, the rest of the country would get the sh*ts

    Maybe its “payback” for not delivering the extra Senate seat?

    well *sniff*.. *sob* – we TRIED!! Not our fault that we’re so safe we sleep=walk through elections and never see a pollie of any stripe, and wouldn’t know it was voting day, until we go down to the local shops to pick up some bread and milk, and see all the cars parked at the local school…..

    Then late in the campaign Rudd shows up, to say “G’Day” we hope, (being last last but not least?) but no – he glares angrily at a city of 300,000 people and tells us our jobs and microeconomy are going to be screwed Big-Time…..

    Canberra is a large city, it is not a barracks for public servants. It has 70% of its workforce outside of the public sector. It has plumbers, construction workers, bus-drivers, teachers, businesses – large and small – mortgage-belters, drugs and crime problems, homelessness, poverty, public hospitals (with the same problems as everybody elses), schools and Centrelink offices.

    Thats what we get for keeping the faith for 40+ years, through good times and the bad, and even then in the worse times, in sickness and in health, for richer or poorer … we even voted in a local ACT Labor territory govt ….

    and we finally see the guy we voted for, and got yelled at :(

    Today, after the ministries were announced, we must be the only two safe Labor seats in the country that are not rejoicing. We got *punished* :(

    To make matters worse, our next-door neighbours in Queanbeyan (Eden-Monaro) can now snob it over us, coz Mike Kelly got a guernsey… so our satellite “commuter” town, can now go Nyah, Nyah, Nyah… they get to keep their jobs and hold their heads high.

    The only bright side of the eternal optimists around Canberra is that the Lodge will finally have residents again. Its been a twice-daily commuter “eyesore” for many years being empty’n'all, could do with some maintenance and a lick of paint though.

    Tho I stupidly piped up and said it proves Rudd is a “true-blue” Aussie PM.

    Canberra-bashing is a great Australian tradition, up there with vegemite.

  816. 816
    Boerwar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    It won’t matter much what Nelson and Bishop do or say in the next year or so – unless they manage to bring on a DD. Apart from that, no-one much is going to be listening to them. There is a bit of a focus now because of the election but as xmas comes along everybody will just switch off.

  817. 817
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:38 pm | Permalink

    815 Rain, stop it! You’ll make me cry.

  818. 818
    PaulofKotara
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Grog at 808. Kerry OBrien was lost for words I thought. I couldnt quite hear him at the time but it was an effort to prove that he cares for the indigenous population.

  819. 819
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:39 pm | Permalink

    815 Rain – I feel your pain.

  820. 820
    Boerwar
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Rain @815 Good point. Canberrans were probably better placed than most to understand the true value of the former Government. It was good to see that, despite the sure knowledge that they would be 2% one-off efficiency dividended, and meataxed in the bloaters, most Canberrans voted for their ideals rather than their pockets.

  821. 821
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    Rain, look on the bright side… you’ve got no less Ministers in Canberra now than you did before.

    I have to say, I really like Kate Lundy and would choose her over a lot of the people Rudd has in his Ministry.

  822. 822
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Memo to William Bowe… while you are in the frame of mind to moderate comments, can I ask respectfully that comments on this site about (alleged) ‘religious nutters’, ‘jackboot extremists’ and ‘fascists’ are also consigned to the moderation bin. Such comments fail your humour test, add nothing to the discussion and (most importantly) when such comments are applied to politicians of either of the major parties in this country, they are ill informed. You were (rightly) outraged by the remarks of the chief of staff of the former member for Eden Monaro. I see no reason why your outrage should not extend to those who litter your forums with similar remarks.

  823. 823
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:48 pm | Permalink

    821, yes Lundy’s star (such as it was) certainly has fallen over the last 18 months. She would be shattered, I think, not to get sport.

  824. 824
    Erytnicam
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    So am I to take it that the way Nelson secured the leadership was by opposing Turbull’s moral position on an Aboriginal apology? That he used that to wedge a more talented man out of the position?

    Enjoy this grub while he lasts.

  825. 825
    JB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Nelson does have a portrait of Neville Bonner in his (now former) office as big as a double door…. I saw it myself. Not that I think that speaks anything of a man other than he is a big believer in individual achievement as in compatible as that may seem compared to a lot of Indigenous communal/collectivist belief system.

    See, Nelson is able to turn around and give one of his stories about how Bonner himself was from a highly disadvantaged background, yet managed to climb up the ladder in the Liberal Party and become the first Indigenous person ever elected to any Australian Parliament. And that in itself – in Nelson and LP’s logic – proves that if all Indigenous individuals would just focus on thier own success they would be able to lift their communities from obscene poverty and disadvantage etc etc….

    And let’s not forget that it was Nelson (though in no small part pressured by Abbott as Workplace Relations minister at the time and the PM himself) who wanted to introduce AWAs into the higher education system as well as all other regressive policies bundled under the name of HEWRs (which – ingeniously – stands for Higher Education Workplace Reform) long before they were actually news. This included blackmailing those more impoverished universities to introduce such policies in exchange for a slice of a dedicated funding pool (and I know coz I worked in one such institution…).

    Fine man, that Nelson…

  826. 826
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    The lifestory of Nelson is here.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendan_Nelson

  827. 827
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    825 JB, I’m with you all the way on Nelson.

    I hope Rudd does him slowly.

  828. 828
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    The Libs should have gone for Turnbull, instead they may have consigned themselves to infighting and turmoil. JB you are right, Nelson is like Howard sneaky and two faced and has some political baggage. Turnbull offers none of this but may get some as Treasurer. Going head to head with Swan will be interesting, i get the feeling he will frie Rudd.

  829. 829
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Meant Frie Swan.

  830. 830
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    David Charles @ 822 – Quite correct, no need to use those hurtful terms, particularly when the generic expression ‘NSW Liberal Party organisation’ includes them all.

  831. 831
    JB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    827 Always good to meet like-minded people Grog..

    BTW, for what it’s worth, I think Costello was pushed. I am not fooled one bit by the PM’s endorsement of Costello in his concession speech and everyone else’s expectations that he would simply inherit the throne no sweat… In fact, this was a deliberate tactic on behalf of the Libs, their typical smoke-and-mirrors which they have perfomed, ah, so well over the past 11 3/4 years….He could have waited more than one day before withdrawing from the contest and made it more convincing but time was not on his side. It is simply obvious that he was too much part of an old pack who blundered this campaign and too unwilling to compromise on IR in the future. If that is possible at all, I think he was more hardline on IR than Howard himself….

    Nelson, on the other hand, is someone with PM ambitions but too mellow for the hardliners in the LP (and I am yet to be convinced they are all but extinct – your Heffernans and Tuckeys are still around and the HR Nicholls society stil rules the roost).

    As for the Indigenous issues, it is the Bennelong Society which sets the agenda for the entire Coalition (bar a former ALP strongman or two among its members).

  832. 832
    Tom
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    Rudd might decide that a DD is a good idea so that Nelson can face an election.

  833. 833
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:09 pm | Permalink

    David Charles @ 822

    Are you suggesting that the Exclusive Brethren (for example) are not fair game when discussing the relationship between the Liberal party and its far right Christian constituency? Given the events of the past few weeks, I’d say that issue is front and centre for all agents of renewal within the party.

  834. 834
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull will fry Swan? With what? I’m consistantly amazed that people have such a high impression of him. Did he display that much competence with Environment and Water Resources? Not really… I recall farmers laughing at him at some conference because he didn’t understand rainfall flow.

  835. 835
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:11 pm | Permalink

    To fry Swan Turnbull will have to significantly improve his performance in parliament. He was not good this year. (Though being Howard’s Environment Minister was being asked to defend the indefensible).

    But as a lawyer, no doubt being in opposition will suit him better – asking questions is more his game.

  836. 836
    Emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    JB, no way was Costello pushed. He’s always been a big cry baby and he showed it again, classic born to rule – never has the expression no guts no glory been more appropriate. I wouldn’t give the Libs too much credit for careful strategic planning – note who the new Oppostion Leader is.

  837. 837
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to the Liberals for not detracting from Rudd Labor’s big day.

    Without a person of Malcom Turnbull’s charisma, wider electoral appeal and sheer common sense, the Opposition has blown its chance for a transformation into competitiveness in 2010.

    Instead, the Libs have decided to fight for the next three years to prove the voters were completely stupid not to appreciate how wonderful WorkChoices really was for them.

    Nelson’s obvious big selling point with Howard loyalists and W.A. kingmakers was to tell them that he was never going to say sorry about WorkChoice, Kyoto, Aboriginal intervention or stolen generations, Iraq, AWB, etc.. He’s proud of it all.

    Kicking an own goal in the first minute of the game does not constitute a good start on their road back to government.

  838. 838
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:17 pm | Permalink

    758
    Julie

    I have to put my hand up Julie, (and paid my dues to William too.)

  839. 839
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Is it even legal to fry a swan? It’s probably safer, anyway, to get it in a half nelson and call for a bishop.

  840. 840
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Kerry was so bored by Nelson that he fell asleep and began mumbling about Malcolm Fraser

  841. 841
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Neilbris… I bet you journalists long for the days of Paul Keating’s press conferences.

  842. 842
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    758
    Julie

    And by the way, Half Nelson was just about 9:1 too, yummy. Once Abbott was out, it was a much easier decision, but never trusting Malvolio of Mayo not to ponce in to save them from MalBull at the last minute, I slung a $10 covering bet on him at near 300 to 1.

    Fun, really.

  843. 843
    JB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Grog, agreement again.

    Turnbull is yet another classical Liberal. Personal challenge is the name of the game. The man is a multimillionaire. The only thing he has not got is the ultimate in political power, although he is well on his way towards obtaining it. Perhaps this will actually work in his favour and perhaps he will become the leader in time to actually win the elections for the Coalition in 2013 (or whenever). Perhaps he should be really really happy he was not elected to leaad this time around – because Nelson will lose the 2010 election provided he stays put and provided there is a miracle equivalent to the immaculate conception.

    I would not underestimate Swan though – I think he was second behind Rudd in the ALP leadership stakes.

  844. 844
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    LETP. we ALL long for Keating’s press conferences

  845. 845
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    831 Yes, the Bennelong Society is a strange organisation and I could never understand how Maroochy Barambah got to be a founding member.

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Bennelong_Society

  846. 846
    JB
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:24 pm | Permalink

    Actually my last sentence in 2 par should read ‘provided there is NOT a miracle equivalent to immacualte conception.’

    Emily – having Nelson as a leader is BRILLIANT strategy: they KNOW they will lose so they might as well pick the biggest loser to lead them and save the good one for later… Turnbull losing the 2010 election would be a blow too big to take…

  847. 847
    newy stats
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    looks like the ALP covered all the bases as they have registered:
    abbottfacts.com
    bishopfacts.com
    turbullfacts.com
    nelsonfacts.com

    tuckeyfacts.com is still unregistered – the ALP should be thinking outside the box!

  848. 848
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull is their most competent MP the Libs have, the rest are pathetic. He at least saw reality straight after the election and realised the policies the Libs should support, this alone shows significant political judgement , the rest of them still have not come to terms with defeat and seem to willing to fight amongst themselves. l don’t Turnbull his background speaks for itself but an interesting thing which came to mind the other day was if he did become leader Labor should bring forth the Republic baby again and just see how Turnbull handles it with a list of people within his party ( National Party) who are against it, i fancy they will implode.

  849. 849
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, meant i don’t like Turnbull

  850. 850
    emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    JB – fair call, but I still think you’re giving them too much credit!

  851. 851
    Inner Westie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    pynefacts.com is registered to a nursing home in Kensington Gardens. (Also to a plastic comb manufacturer in Thailand.)

  852. 852
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    I think only royalty were allowed to eat Swan. Though my ancestors in the north-east of Tasmania (Aboriginal society being unware of European sumptuary regulations) apparently use to eat them. So its ok for monarchs and hunter gatherers, not the presumptious bourgeoisie.

  853. 853
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    David Charles 822
    “can I ask respectfully that comments on this site about (alleged) ‘religious nutters’, ‘jackboot extremists’ and ‘fascists’ are also consigned to the moderation bin.”

    Up to a point I agree with you. Comments that are racist, sexist, denigrate people over personal characteristics, or slur by association with infamous groups such as “Nazi” or “Stalinist” should be out. So to me, of your jibs, “fascist” may be out, but religious nutter/extremist, jackboot extremist etc seem to me OK. But surely beyond that, colour and humour are OK? Is there no room for wit? I think humour is one of our best weapons against the bully.

    I think the context matters too. Indeed, similar terms to yours are used by many Liberals to attack union officials. One person’s jackboot extremist is another person’s union official, one person’s religious nutter is another’s, well, Tony Abbott.

    I also agree we should be consistent and not hypocritical. As Liberals might recall, the former PM himself started his term in office by decrying political correctness, then at best doing nothing to stop his leiutenants using all sorts of appalling smears over the years, culminating in the Lindsey disgrace. I’d hardly apologise for calling that the work of jackboot extremists. They were embarrassed they were caught; not for what they are.

  854. 854
    Erytnicam
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    The problem with accepting a loss in 2010 so Turnbull can sweep in is that there is no artificial compression of Turnbulls lead in Wentworth – a good candidate in Wentworth and Nelson performing badly enough could results in another 2 for 1 Election wipeout.

  855. 855
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    DRAFT DISCUSSION PAPER.
    PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO MR KEVIN RUDD, PRIME MINISTER ELECT.

    ‘HOW TO GET TO SORRY’. Suggested Action Plan, Time Line.

    BACKGROUND: Convention is that the Governor General has an expected tenure of 5 years.

    Major-General Michael Jeffery (remember him?) was commissioned Governor General on 11 August 2003.

    To serve the remainder of the former GG’s term, that is, three years.

    As of 29/11/07, 4 years, 109 days served ( no comment.) 5 years due to expire in mid 2008.

    As of December 2007, GG permitted to resume his duties in the position. Courtesy PM of Australia.

    PROPOSED STRATEGY:

    Momentum political and active, occurs in addressing indigenous issues. NT intervention reviewed and reshaped.
    In consultation with stakeholders.

    Sorry Legislation flagged. Consultation occurs. Noel Pearson mollified.

    Opinion sought in private over logical person for next GG.

    Sorry Legislation, of whatever type, is framed.

    Date nominated as to its being put before the House.

    Current GG announces intended retirement date.

    Next GG decision announced.

    Professor Lowitja O’Donohue OA. First woman. First aboriginal. National Living Treasure.

    Last Australian Governor General. Full circle.

    Sorry Legislation passes through HOR, supported by Malcolm Turnbull, Leader of the Opposition, then Senate.

    New Governor General Lowitja O’Donohue signs Legislation. Great fanfare.

    TEMPUS FUGIT: Republic put forward as issue for next election. Referendum. New round of suggestions for the Flag.

    Rudd Government re elected to second term. Terms of Referendum framed and announced.

    President to be elected by the people. Candidates put forward.

    Include: Julian Burnside QC. Tim Costello. Malcolm Fraser. Ian Chappell. Fiona Stanley. William Deane. William Bowe. Possum. Decision made, by the people.

    CONCLUSION: Republic comes into being. More great fanfare.

    Former Monarch of Australia attends to anoint decision of the Australian people ( Look, don’t touch, Kevin.)

    Sydney Harbour Bridge closed for Reconciliation walk.

    CC: Pollbludgers, Possum Comitati.

  856. 856
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:40 pm | Permalink

    Heather Ridout on television again, probably about to say how magnificent this new government will be, crawler she is, no one from the Labor cabinet should speak to her.

  857. 857
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Nelson Flip flop Number one

    http://dailyflute.com/?p=1338

  858. 858
    emily
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:41 pm | Permalink

    Heather’s on a lot stronger ground that Peter Hendy…

  859. 859
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:42 pm | Permalink

    Not sure if anyone’s posted this – I was watching PJK goingon about ACME fightback and I saw tis “top 10 moments in Australian Politics”.

    Quite good really:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMq0tzfmc3Y&feature=related

  860. 860
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:43 pm | Permalink

    Agree, but both sang the workchoices tune and both should be left to talk to themselves, would not surprise me one or the other becomes a Lib candidate.

  861. 861
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Yes I vaguely recall reading one article this week where Ridout went to pains to describe herself and her organisation as “politically neutral”. LOL

    Me thinks she protests too much. How stupid do they think people are?

  862. 862
    Lose the election please
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    Ridout is actually meant to be one of the more neutral leaders of business lobbies. Note that her lobby group did not donate to the pro-WorkChoices campaign and urged other groups not to either.

    Really, what she’s doing is representing her members. It’s in her members’ best interests for WorkChoices to stay so that’s what she’ll advocate. Just as its seen to be in the interest of the ACTU’s members for them to advocate the abolition of WorkChoices.

    True though that for a while it seemed Roll out Ridout was there to be interviewed in every union scare story the Australian could come up with. Remember the one about builders working in “Risk of Rudd” clauses?

  863. 863
    kina
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:51 pm | Permalink

    “On the Saturday evening before the election, Kevin Rudd was in Melbourne. It was an opportunity for some time off, an early night after five weeks of tough campaigning. Instead, Rudd went on to the streets to visit a soup kitchen and talk to the homeless people who rely on it. And he spent time at a homeless shelter, listening to the stories of the residents. There were no cameras, no reporters. The media were not told about the outing. It was not about votes. But it said a lot about the man who would be swept into the prime ministership a week later.”

    “But the bloke offering “new leadership” also has the kind of concerns Labor leaders are supposed to have. Rudd is certainly, as he claims, an economic conservative, but he nevertheless has more in common with Tim Costello than with Peter. And the commentary suggesting he is a John Howard clone – a younger version of the PM the voters have so emphatically rejected – is mistaken.”

    http://thebulletinelection.ninemsn.com.au/election_that_changes_everything.htm

  864. 864
    Megan
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Socrates…agree,and important to be able to discuss the characteristics of both Fascism and Communism as well as capitalism and socialism.
    (Have we been backing away from the reds under the bed into the arms of fascism ?)

    Found this eye-opener -www.rense.com/general37/fascism.htm
    not just the characteristics but also the article “We thought we were free” .

    Now to find something at the other end of the spectrum.

  865. 865
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    You kidding me LTEP, yes she did not support an advertising campaign but i do remember her on TV supporting workchoices and she did over and over. Yes she speaks for her group but should not go around being political and she was. She is now on television talking the economic rationalist line, taking skilled migrants from countries who lack such skills workers themselves, Ridout is one of those people who has never struggled in her life and has no idea of what it is like to struggle.

  866. 866
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    LETP: There’s a lot of small businesses that are glad to see Work Choices given the flick.
    Crikey Whitey….you’ve got a good bead on Rudd’s knack of boring everyone witless with what were causes of inspiration!

  867. 867
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:56 pm | Permalink

    I for one don’t trust people with religious hats who care about the poor what agendas do they have.

  868. 868
    Richard Jones
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    I really can’t imagine Brendan Nelson will last three years. I give him two max.
    In the meantime Malcolm Turnbull will prove himself a capable money man as shadow Treasurer and demonstrate that he is capable of running the Opposition.
    He will still have to wait a while to be PM unless there is a Depression. Some gloomy talk around to which I don’t subscribe. The new economy will be driven not by war and war preparedness as the American economy is currently but by the urgent need to address climate change. There will be massive new investments.

  869. 869
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    834
    Lose the election please

    If you can find it, Alan Ramsey did a monumental job on Malbull when he dared to slag Head of Treasury, when Ken Henry came out to say the $10 billion on the back of the envelope had never even been submitted to his department.

    Malbull made some stupid comments about how he was dealing with “real people who had dirt under their fingernails”.

    Ramsey’s piece was about Ken Henry’s childhood and his formative experiences. It was a slamming indictment of Malbull’s self-importance, and one of the best pieces of journalism I’ve read this year.

    Do not fear, Turnbull is so very full of himself that he will get his turn to choke on his own ego.

  870. 870
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 9:59 pm | Permalink

    Clive Hamilton creaming Ridout on television, he should be a cabinet secretary or advisor to this government, so much sense.

  871. 871
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    marky, I think his agenda is to lead a government that cares about the poor.

  872. 872
    Will From Kooyong
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:01 pm | Permalink

    Finally watched the 7:30 Report from the ABC website. God Nelson is a bore. And who really thinks the leopard has changed its spots over night and become a more moderate party? Looks like they will oppose any IR changes, Aboriginal intervention and apologising to the Stolen Generation. Add to this that Bishop is deputy and IR shadow spokesperson just sums up what they have learnt from the weekend. Absolutely zero!!!

  873. 873
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Well, in my view, it’s just going to be an absolute laugh a minute over the next few years. The Q’l'd Libs. are eating themselves, the W.A. Libs are doing a similiar implosion, N.S.W. Libs. are in the thrall of ghastly neo con religious wing nuts. Who knows about S.A.? Heather Ridout thinks the Labor line on industrial relations is admirable! Gawd! And Brendon Nelson- who got a universal total crack up laughing attack across my entire work place – when announced as Opposition Leader!

  874. 874
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    Crikey Whitey – wouldn’t that be terrific for Prof Lowitja get a top job. But it’s a bit of white fella dreamin’ if you think PM Rudd will be rushing into symbolism of that degree. Just think back to last week and his contortions on the radio about Sorry.

    As for the Presidential candidates you list, agree with the lot, except Ian Chappell – great cricket captain, but only good at leading those who agree with him. Better leave out his brother Greg too, after the recent ABC show about his tenure in India as their coach. It wasn’t a triumph of engagement with new peoples.

  875. 875
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    You talking about Tim Costello Grog?

  876. 876
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    869 KR. I for one don’t fear Turnbull. Too many ALP supporters see him as a kind of Albert Speer of the Liberal party – you know, “the good Liberal”. Mostly this is based on his head of the Republican cause.

    Don’t forget Costello is a Republican as well.

    Turnbull stood up to be counted with John Howard and everything he stood for.

  877. 877
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    I for one dont mind the crazy nutjobs on this blog whose line of attack is personal abuse, I take that as a sign of a weak argument.

    What is sad that we have lost the middle of the road – the Oakeshott’s, Hugo’s etc. It seems in many ways the blog is now dominated by cheerleaders and Labor job seekers.

    Oh well!

  878. 878
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Recent research Grog suggests Speer was anything but the good nazi.

  879. 879
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    Marky – I assumed you were referring to the Bulletin Article:

    “As part of the most negative campaign ever seen in this country, John Howard and his lieutenants had tried to portray the Labor leader as a politician bereft of genuine beliefs. Tony Abbott, shameless as always, even tried to cast doubt on Rudd’s Christian faith. But Australia’s new prime minister has strong principles. Christian principles. He believes in good works, and he practises what he preaches.”

  880. 880
    Grog
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    878 ESJ. Exactly.

  881. 881
    charles
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Watch the 7:30 Report, Nelson is a disaster. We are back to the crap over sorry. Mean spirited nonsense.

  882. 882
    kina
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    The lodge handover – they actually look genuinely happy ???

    http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200711/r207471_792307.jpg

  883. 883
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:12 pm | Permalink

    Marky Marky – I was in the audience for this program, and Clive Hamilton was talking nonsense. Apparently we have no skills crisis, we should have zero net immigration and we have no ageing workforce.

    I’m usually sympathetic to his ideas, but he was off with the pixies tonight.

  884. 884
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    ESJ
    I’d be sorry to see you go from this blog and enjoy your verbal jousts.

    And while my schardenfreud-meter has been off the scale since about 6.30pm Saturday, personally I’d also hate to see this blog lose the ability to sniff out the stench of rotting fish that often eminates from the HQ of NSW Labor as well. :)

  885. 885
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    The lodge handover - they actually look genuinely happy ???

    http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200711/r207471_792307.jpg

    Therese Rein always looks happy.

  886. 886
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    marky marky @ 867. It’s a bit complicated really and usually requires sittting with such a person for some time, listening, trying to clarify if they are clearly nuts, or actually have something to say. Sadly, most people who think they are the second coming of whatever deity they believe in, are just certifiable, tho’ sometimes we can talk them into some things that help their lives be less tortured. Jeez, you people are interesting to speak with. I thought I could just bugger off!

  887. 887
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    They were probably impressed by how clean it was. Hardly lived in for 11 years.

  888. 888
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    ESJ
    I’d be sorry to see you go from this blog and enjoy your verbal jousts.

    Has this thread been converted to a Lack-of-Victory Lap for ESJ?

  889. 889
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn
    Its our left-wing compassion coming out – thats why we form more tolerant governments!

  890. 890
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    ESJ @ 877 – I wouldn’t worry too much – it’s ok. I get the impression that there are a few non-party members here. As a confirmed non-member all my life I like to read the posts of others whose principles are not hanging on a party hook inside a branch meeting door . That’s not to say that party members are not worth reading – most are, although the tunnel-visioned of both sides are tiresome at times. And what’s the point of becoming personally abusive? One’s argument is lost immediately.

    end of sanctimonious interlude

  891. 891
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    I’m not surprised that Greg Combet has got this new little jobbie as defence procurement parly sect. It says to me that Kev wants out of the Super Hornet contract and Combet has the brains and the brawn to do it. What joy that the new Opposition Leader is Mr Super Hornet himself!

    I used to call Nelson the Minister for Saluting Flagpoles, but might have to go with the Super Horn moniker now.

  892. 892
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    887 [They were probably impressed by how clean it was. Hardly lived in for 11 years.]

    I thought they were expressing delight about how cheap the rent is.

  893. 893
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Geez that Sheahan guy on Difference of Opinion s***ts me. I sat through a “Gen Y” seminar of his a year or so back (a forced exercise). He is all form and no substance. Wait for him to mention his latest book.

  894. 894
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Charles he is absolutely right, it is a beat up. We have over 30 per cent of our workforce who are working casually Charles and cannot get full time jobs, i work with a number.
    I also work with people who have degrees in business, and working casually. Charles get fair dinkum. Have you heard of the hidden unemployment- you only have work about 4 hours a fortnight? to not be counted as unemployed. The rate is deceptive. We may have a skills crisis in certain areas, but why as Clive rightly points out look at what we are doing in our uni’s making the point scoring systems for courses so high and restrictive that no one can enter them. We need to employ our own and provide fairness in the workplace by having people who are working long hours, working a little less and people working few hours taking up the slack. Charles you are wrong.

  895. 895
    Harry 'Snapper' Organs
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t it O.K. that Kevvie & his beloved said a polite goodbye?

  896. 896
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Marky Marky, who is Charles?

  897. 897
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Charlie. There has been a Charles on this blog and for some reason got mixed up. Thought you were little left for him.

  898. 898
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    866 Neilbris

    Looking for positive feedback. Just skip me if you’re bored.

  899. 899
    apres
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    I admire the fact that Kevvie and his beloved were always noice, always said ‘Mr Howard’ and ‘Mrs Howard’ whereas JohnandJanette were as rude as could be. It’s a matter of discipline, not niceness.

  900. 900
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:27 pm | Permalink

    Nico- one gets the feeling that he likes hearing his voice.

  901. 901
    asanque
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    Donation made, thanks William :)

  902. 902
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    891 What joy that the new Opposition Leader is Mr Super Hornet himself!

    Yes, I think that Mr Super Hornet it is the sort of nickname that Nelson would love. He will like it even better next year when he finds the name has stuck but the contract been set free. Combet would relish the task of cleaning up the mess left by Mr Super Hornet. In fact if you haven’t nailed down the title with super glue or copyright, I might just borrow the title for my own political purposes.

  903. 903
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    How many portfolios do each of the Queensland Libs have?

  904. 904
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Marky, it was nit-picking.

    We do have underemployment, mate, but it is concentrated amongst the lowest-skilled parts of the workforce. We DO have critical shortages of skilled labour.

    The best thing we can do about this is simple – educate people and then educate them some more. However, the reality is that, like nearly all developed countries, we have a low birthrate. That means that immigration is going to continue to play a critical role in our economy for the foreseeable future. Hamilton didn’t say the words – ‘net zero immigration’ – but what he was arguing for was essentially the same as what clowns like One Nation propose. He has his head in the sand if he doesn’t think that an ageing workforce is going to affect our quality of life.

  905. 905
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    TO HENRY BOWE

    per aec site ‘declaration vote srutiny’

    Many ‘marginal LCP seats have LARGE “absentee” envelopes issued but NIL received

    eg. Macquarie 5365
    Lindsay 5210
    Corangamite 5579

    does this mean , they are still to be received by aec ?

  906. 906
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Harry & Marky – . The question is how much do you want medieval superstition to inform decisions that directly affect the whole electorate, most of whom have moved on? Rudd should drop the religious thing from the public eye – it must not become relevant to his decision-making.

    I cannot abide the real American pre-condition for political office being religious belief. I think we are moving in that direction too. The problem with it is that a general tolerance of ‘moderate’ religious types gives cover to religious extremists, such as the neo-cons in the US. Have you read about the Mormon candidate in the US? -talk about freaky. But then 70% of Americans believe in creation. Oh, dear …

  907. 907
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Tend to agree, people should not be working until they die on the shopfloor.

  908. 908
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Brendan Nelson:

    Leader of the Opposition & Shadow Minister for HUGE portraits of Neville Bonner

  909. 909
    never mind
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Harry “Snapper” Organs says –

    Sadly, most people who think they are the second coming of whatever deity they believe in, are just certifiable, tho’ sometimes we can talk them into some things that help their lives be less tortured.

    Actually I reckon you’ll also find quite a few incidences in human history where the so-called nut-jobs and ‘extremists’ actually turn out to have been completely right. With the real nut-jobs actually being the status quo…
    Anyone heard of Galileo and the Church? Earth the centre of the universe and all that…
    There you go, an organisation that was acting on behalf of the ‘first coming’ (long since dead) to suppress a bit of real knowledge (a real fact!) that would transform peoples ideas about their world.
    Damn those bloody nut-jobs eh, and their so-called tele-scopes.

    Just because most people believe something, doesn’t actually mean that is the way world actually is.
    Sadly perhaps, the majority could be just as likely deluded as a minority, it is called human stupidity. Which again perhaps sadly, appears to be the only universal human attribute. Oh, and smiling.

    The fact is that smear and prejudice and closed minds have probably been one of the biggest factors in much of human misery.

    “The most important lesson of history is that people don’t learn the lessons of history” Aldous Huxley

  910. 910
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    I think that the most telling thing that I saw today was Malcolm Turnbull’s slip up as he exited the party room.

    “They’ll….We’ll win in 2010.”

    Nelson is screwed. It’ll only take one speechwriter to be a Turnbull fan and Nelson will find himself having his own “Things that batter” moment.

  911. 911
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    Steve, spread the Mr Super Hornet thang far and wide. I certainly will. And I will borrow Annabel Crabbe’s take on Julie Bishop – Krystle Carrington. Krystle and the Super Hornet – says all one needs to.

  912. 912
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    I see little evidence of this with Rudd, what i hate though is that our politicians use religon as a form of moralistic virtue or to show a compassionate side but in the end with the policies they set they seem to be the opposite, Howard and Iraq war, Children overboard. Religion in politics i agree has no place and should be left alone.
    With Tim Costello i always saw him as a fence sitter in regards with the Howard Government and could never really like him. He rarely criticised it.

  913. 913
    Ghost of Jim Cairns
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    Lateline announced Gavan O’Connor rather than Brendan as part of the ministry. Easy to confuse mediocre time server with talentless hack. Which is which, you ask.

  914. 914
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    7.30 report TV footage 1993 election:

    Nelson on a podium saying “I’ve never voted Labor in my life”

    The Liberal hard heads will NEVER allow Nelson to front an election campaign as this replay in a campaign would demolish his credibility

    IF you doubt this , imagine 2007 campaign showing Rudd in 1993 saying “I’ve never voted Labor”…Howard would have demolished his credibility

  915. 915
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    Be careful what you say Ghost his brother may get his pathetic union on to you.

  916. 916
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Ghost,
    Who’s the lateline interviewee, please?

  917. 917
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    Mr Super Hornet dogged by ALP past.

    Dr Nelson was elected Opposition leader today by three votes over his rival, Malcolm Turnbull.

    After his victory, he said he came from a Labor family.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/29/2105620.htm

  918. 918
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    Ally Moore with Lindsay Tanner

  919. 919
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    May I suggest a nice alliteration for the new leader, Dr Half Nelson:

    Horatio Hornet

  920. 920
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    P.S. to Ghost

    A spent a late night getting elephant’s trunk with Cairns two months before Whitlam beat McMahon. He’s a top bloke.

  921. 921
    Neilbris
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    Crikey: Sorry you misunderstood. I thought what you wrote was insightful and funny. It was your parody of the managerial approach to achieving the ‘vision thing’ that I was sending up.

  922. 922
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    912 – Marky – Not a DLP govt.? I hope not. I agree about Tim C and many thousands like him. When you think about types like Abbott & Co – they are sooo devout and yet take part in decisions that obviously hurt the disadvantaged. For them religion is merely a means to control – as in Opus Dei in NSW Libs

  923. 923
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Thanks, Double Marky.

  924. 924
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:48 pm | Permalink

    Agree with that assessment, Cairns was great.

  925. 925
    StanS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    758, I got $9.60 on Betfair, first time I’ve ever backed a Lib and I won, does this mean I should keep supporting them?

  926. 926
    Hemingway
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    What Jim wanted was a whole ministry for youth issues, but never got within cooee of that goal———unless you count Juni Morosi.

  927. 927
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    I agree about Tim C and many thousands like him. When you think about types like Abbott & Co - they are sooo devout and yet take part in decisions that obviously hurt the disadvantaged.

    I thought Abbott’s attack on Rudd over Rudd’s Christianity was the lowest of low. Abbott accused Rudd of of supporting killing because Rudd voted to allow the introduction of the RU486 abortion drug.

    This was an idiotic criticism by Abbott, because it pre-supposes that when life begins is a completely uncontroversial issue. Abbott seemed to be saying that every Christian must accept as a piece of dogma that two cells equals a human life, and if they don’t then they can’t call themselves Christians.

  928. 928
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Love your work, Kirribilli Removals.

  929. 929
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Krystle Carrington?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krystle_Carrington

  930. 930
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    If only. Kirribilli Removals.

    Now, I really am looking for serious comment, criticism on my 855.

    I do intend to send it to Kevin. With any comments.

    A bit of a shoving may assist.

    Whatever Kev prevaricated about, jaundiced view, and thanks, it is up to people like us to ensure that this is the message.

    Ps Only dreamed up a few candidates. Last time I think some wanted Warnie.

  931. 931
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Seems like the Super Hornet is already being left in Rudd’s wake. Don’t think he will be able to handle the pace of a workaholic like Rudd.

    Newly elected Liberal leader Brendan Nelson says he is not in favour of the Labor plan to say sorry to Aboriginal Australians.

    Prime Minister-elect Kevin Rudd says there will be a formal apology to the stolen generation of Indigenous people.

    Dr Nelson says he wants to discuss the issue with his Liberal colleagues, but he says he does not see the need for an apology.

    “We in my view we have no responsibility to apologise or take ownership for what was done by earlier generations,” he said.

    The beaten Liberal leader candidate, Malcolm Turnbull, also supported the apology and said it was a mistake for the Howard Government to have refused to say sorry.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2007/11/29/2105652.htm?section=justin

  932. 932
    Fargo61
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    For those that like to laugh…

    The position of the QLD Liberals explained…

    Mr Nicholls wants to take over from Dr Flegg, but having only 4 out of 8 votes in the party room, he could not get a spill motion passed. Prior to that both groups of 4 has seperate meetings, that the opposing 4 could not or would not attend.

    Mr Nicholls says that Dr Flegg does not have the support of half of the party room (true) and that he should resign, or declare the leadership vacant and, that Dr Flegg should vote for Mr Nicholls, or abstain from voting.

    Dr Flegg says that no one has more support than he himself does (also true) and that he should therefore remain as leader. Dr Flegg says that he does not actually want to be leader and is sorry that he he accepted the position in the first place, but that he will not give it up for Mr Nicholls.

    Both men say that the other’s position is untenable.

    Dr Flegg has offered to stand aside and hand over to his current (loyal) deputy Mark McArdle, if one of Mr Nicholl’s supporters will in turn serve Mr McArdle as deputy, however so far on Flegg loyalist Mr Stevens has indicatd a wilingness to do so. John-Paul Langbroek has indicated that he does want to be deputy, but not under Mr Mcardle.

    Apparently the Liberal’s State Council is still in session and debating “whether to give the party state president Warwick Parer a vote if future leadership ballots became tied”.

    Dr Flegg has indicated that if any such motion is passed and acted upon, then he will probably take the matter to court, as his advice is that such action is contrary to the constitution of the Liberal Party.

  933. 933
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    I ask the question again how many portifolios do each member of the Queensland Libs hold?

  934. 934
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Is the story true that Nelson has been married 3 times
    after saying in the 1993 election campaign on TV “I’ve never voted Liberal”)

  935. 935
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Here’s Annabel on Julie Krystle Bishop:

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/who-needs-people-skills-with-dynasty-onfreetoair/2007/11/28/1196036982623.html

    I admit I liked “People Skills” better.

  936. 936
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    932 Fargo61, the bit that you left out is that Parer is the Former Minister for coal who doesn’t believe in standing down for any reason when it is Parer himself under pressure but now he demands Flegg stand down.

  937. 937
    MayoFeral
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Combet would relish the task of cleaning up the mess left by Mr Super Hornet.

    He’ll find out what work really is then because there is a lot of it. Not only the SHs, but the F-35s are totally inadequate as F-111 replacements (which don’t need replacing anyway), and may end up not be a match for the Su-30s that are popping up throughout the our region, though to be fair it was Robert Hill and JWH who lumbered us with the F-35 deal. Then there are the question marks over the second hand tanks, problems with some of the army’s most basic weaponry, not enough air refuelers, still no choppers for the navy frigates, ……..

  938. 938
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:05 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Ron Brown, Brendan Nelson has been married 3 times.

  939. 939
    Boll
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    Beautiful, Kirribilli Removals (auspiciously sharing initials with the PM I notice). How about working on one for ms bishop?

    Julie Bishop:Alas, poor johnny. i knew him, horatio.(exeunt stage right)

  940. 940
    Edward StJohn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:07 pm | Permalink

    So what are the chances one of the wives is going to come out and do a Mrs Hewson No1 on Sixty Minutes at an opportune time?

  941. 941
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn – 927 – Remember Santamaria, and Brian Harradine.. Abbott is cast in the same mould. Kevin Andrews also wears his fantasy world on his sleeve. We certainly do not want “me too”on this front. How many irrational believers are there on the Rudd front bench I wonder? Having a quick just now it seems there are likely to be quite a few non-believers among them, which is comforting, if not only because non-believers tend to be more intelligent! (myself excluded from sample)

  942. 942
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:08 pm | Permalink

    God I love John Hewson – “We hawven’t sween the bwest of Bwenden Newlson”

  943. 943
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    933 Marky Marky, Here is the whole Qld coalition.

    http://qldcoalition.org.au/people/default.aspx

  944. 944
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Fargo61,

    It only makes sense if there is something happening outside the parliamentary party.

    For example, the Leaders vote of the parliamentary party has a specific vote in another forum which the agitators need and the defenders think they must protect.

    It is all a bit surreal. The classic arguing about the spoils of irrelevance. But, hey, it keeps them off the street and small furry animal are safe.

  945. 945
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    Now i know what happened to those Doctors wives’…

  946. 946
    Fargo61
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:11 pm | Permalink

    Poll Results

    Who said that online poll results are unreliable? … From the Courier Mail website.

    Thanks for voting, here are the results so far:

    Who would be the best person to lead the State Liberals?

    Bruce Flegg 4% (127 votes)

    Tim Nicholls 17% (464 votes)

    John Paul Langbroek 5% (138 votes)

    Mickey Mouse 72% (1878 votes)

    Sum votes: Total votes: 2607 votes so far

  947. 947
    Boll
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    Tigger would`ve romped it in.

  948. 948
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    945 The Liberal member for Currumbin on the Gold Coast Jann Stuckey is a Doctor’s wife too.

  949. 949
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    I think Mickey needs to come out boldly and either run or support the leadership.

    Greatness awaits!

  950. 950
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Marky Marky, I just looked it up. Remember that the Nationals and Liberals are still in Coalition in opposition in Queensland, so a majority of shadows are Nationals MPs.

    Bruce Flegg is Shadow Treasurer. John-Paul Langbroek is Shadow Health Minister. Mark McArdle is Shadow Attorney-General and Shadow Minister for Justice and Fair Trading. Tim Nicholls is Shadow Minister for Transport and Traffic Management, Trade, Employment and Industrial Relations. Ray Stevens is Shadow Minister for Housing Affordability and Public Works, Information and Communication Technology. Janet Stuckey is Shadow Minister for Child Safety and Women. The other two Liberal MPs are backbenchers.

  951. 951
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Fargo you forgot goofy.

  952. 952
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    855
    Crikey Whitey Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 9:37 pm

    DRAFT DISCUSSION PAPER.
    PRIOR TO SUBMISSION TO MR KEVIN RUDD, PRIME MINISTER ELECT.

    ‘HOW TO GET TO SORRY’. Suggested Action Plan, Time Line.

    COMMENT on appointing an Aborigine as GG
    Sorry Crikey , terrible idea
    I can not think of much more insulting to Aborigines
    because the position of GG is symbolic of the very British Empire that in
    Aboriginal eyes invaded their land

    COMMENT on direct election of a President
    Neither party agrees because it ‘implys’ too much power in the winning President

    COMMENT on ’sorry’ procedure
    say ’sorry’….Howard thought it was hard but it isn’t
    ALL Aborigines & ALL other Aussies know our generation did not participate & are not responsible but that does not stop us from saying ’sorry’
    EVEN when most of the kids were taken away by our past generations in good faith to protect them

    Any comments ?

  953. 953
    DOGS
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    Now that Labor are in Government will any information about the Patricks dispute be brought out to the public?

  954. 954
    Marrickville Mauler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:17 pm | Permalink

    Did I miss something? in the last day or so people seem to be taking the other MM on this blog seriously … meanwhile back at the main game Lindsay Tanner was impressive as usual on Lateline tonight.

  955. 955
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    And they meet in a cublicle at Queensland Parliament House,
    thanks Charlie and i thought Julia Gillard had it tough.
    Should their also be a portfolio called skills in leadership and innovation.

  956. 956
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    950 Charlie, and Nicholls and Stevens sham shadow portfolios doesn’t correspond with any state government portfolio either.

  957. 957
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    DOGS,

    I think Labor will steer clear from anything to do with the Patricks dispute – it was almost 10 years ago and the current historical narrative favours the Labor/Union perspective (primarily thanks to Bastard Boys).

  958. 958
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Fargo – Fantastic Courier poll – every online poll should include Mickey or Peter Brady just as a ‘control’ choice – especially at the ex-gg organs, and Sky, Ch9, Ch7 …
    Perhaps for issues not involving the choice of a person, the option – “my shiny metal arse” or similar should be offered

  959. 959
    Charlie
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    BTW – a question for trivia buffs like Adam. Has there ever been a younger federal minister than Kate Ellis?

  960. 960
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    Interesting, as I thought, Nelson. And as I thought, this would be the pairing.

    Hard yards against Julie and Co, if he really intends to moderate. Hard yards.

    Moderation or retraction is difficult.

    Take back his first wife. If she would have him. Take back his Catholicism, if they would have him.Take back his Labor background, if they would have him. Take back his Union leader, AMA, if they would have him.

  961. 961
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    You guys are a disgrace, do you know the context of what he said, he was backing Hewson and was against Keating who had f’ed the health system royally he was merely saying how upset he was with Labor and that he was backing the Libs not because he was a toff or had anything to gain out of it but because Labor had f’ed the health system.

    Anyway i thought Rudd didn’t use smear and fear???

  962. 962
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Excellent point, Ron Brown at 855

    ‘I can not think of much more insulting to Aborigines
    because the position of GG is symbolic of the very British Empire’

    Considering your other.

  963. 963
    Triffid
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen, it wasn’t Rudd who used that footage – it was the 7.30 report.

  964. 964
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Steve #943. that web site for QLD coalition is a DORK gallery if I’ve ever seen one!

  965. 965
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Crikey agree he has so much baggage. Lord 1/2 Nelson surely can not last to front the 2010 election ? (turnbull wanted the job but nelson has done him a favor) ??

  966. 966
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    959,

    Off the top, posssibly Gary Punch.

  967. 967
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    No no Triffid people were saying that they’d never allow Nelson to fight an election because of that footage.

    God the Health system is a mess, maybe a GP for a leader aint so bad.

    Im liking Nelson more and more now but thats just me.

  968. 968
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Labor never stuffed up the Health system in Victoria Glen, It was Jeff Kennett privatising, cutting beds, contracting staff, and introducing a system called a Case Mix. But of course you had private insurance you galah and of course the AMA were their as usual caring not for the patient but those poor doctors.

  969. 969
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Glen, I agree its outrageously funny, sorry outrageous, that they dredged up that unfortunate film of Nelson screaming “I’ve Never Voted Liberal In My Life!”. But you shouldn’t aim your outrage at Labor. The footage was run by SBS, ABC and Channel Ten news tonight. You just have to convince them that its all a misunderstanding and that Brendan’s “True Blue”. Good luck.

  970. 970
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    964 Aussieguru Just wait until Springborg tackles Seeney for Leadership of the Opposition that is when the feathers will start to fly. That’s when it will get ugly.

  971. 971
    Triffid
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen, yes, but to link this argument with Rudd has no relevance.

  972. 972
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    961
    Glen Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 11:21 pm

    You guys are a disgrace, do you know the context of what he said

    Tell me what context don’t you understand in Lord 1/2 Nelson’s words : ” I have
    NEVER voted Liberal in my life”

  973. 973
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Brendan Nelson is a stop gap leader, while it lasts enjoy because he is a dud.

  974. 974
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    http://psephos.adam-carr.net/countries/a/australia/2007/pendulum2007.txt
    My new Mackerras pendulum

  975. 975
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,5775485,00.jpg

    Brendan is more Aussie than Ruddy boy take alook, redneck vote locked in ;)

  976. 976
    Rain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    LTEP? Do I detect a note of optimism in your posts, after all those weeks of “we’ll all be rooned, ere the year is out”. ?

    Speaking for myself, I thought your Said Hanrahan impression was a wonderful addition to cultural diversity, couldn’t understand why so many got all cranky about it :)

    Thanks also to those wishing comfort, sharing the capital’s pain/shame, its much appreciated!

    821: Lose the election please Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
    Rain, look on the bright side… you’ve got no less Ministers in Canberra now than you did before.

    Actually, they only live here while in session, and in residences set aside in various suburbs. Pauline Hanson was the most unusual I know of though, she chose to live here permanently and brought her family. A few blocks from me. Even more unusual and raised a lot of eyebrows, she chose to send her kids to the local public high-school? The largest high-school with a very mixed bag of class/race population, with the highest crime rates as well. All parents received a letter telling of these new enrollments, and would be discussing it at the next P&C meeting…the Principal was very impressed, almost full turn-out at that P&C meeting *chuckle*

    As for the APS, most of the older public servants who’ve been through this before aren’t worried or frightened, indeed look forward to it, knowing exactly which crap needs to be to cut without batting an eye to meet Rudd’s targets, will take great pleasure in removing those obscene wastes of tax-payers money, and looking forward to finally being able to work on sensible national policies, programs and services – raring to go to hit the ground running :)

    Some of the “old guard” SES have already gone, so many “retirements” announced on All Staff messages in the last month or two? Who would have thought so many had 55-60th birthdays in Oct/Nov? *grin*. One was circulated with an mp3 music file attached, with the song “Another one bites the dust” :)

    But these are a minority of voters in a large city.

    Its younger ones who are terrified, they’ve known nothing else, and being lower level were more likely to be protected from the politicisation by their mid-level managers, and all those other majority of Canberran residents who work outside the APS are worried about flow-on effects to the local city micro-economy business and service sectors etc.

    Even the social services sector, started freaking out about a sudden increase in poverty like we had in 96 – I remember, my own home became an emergency foster home for a stream of kids. Wannabe suicides of 12 year olds off Commonwealth Bridge in the middle of a Canberran winter anyone?

    our DoCS is in about the same shape as NSW’s even if we don’t get into national newslines with dead babies littering the lawns of Parliament House. Our public hospitals arent much better than Royal North Shore. Canberra city gets a lot of “rural refugees”, leaving the surrounding NSW country areas looking for work etc. We also have a sizeable and active Aboriginal community, and I hope Rudd remembers the protocol of Welcome to Country that Parliament House and his Lodge sits on Ngunnawal country.

    The economic tsunami of 96-99 was very nasty for locals, and like the firestorm of 2003, Rudd’s implication that we were all fat-cats living the high-life at the expense of the rest of the country, and needed a meat-axe, probably didn’t go down too well in some sectors, and struck more frayed nerves than I think the ALP was aware of.

  977. 977
    VoterBoy of Over the Water
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Just listened to the 7.30 Report interview: couldn’t work out where I’d heard the voice before. Then it dawned on me; it’s Pauline Hanson.

    Pauline Nelson?

  978. 978
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 961 – why can’t you express yourself this way?:
    “May I disagree with some of the earlier posts about Mr Nelson’s remarks some years ago. While these old comments by him may seem unfortunate, I feel the full context has not been appreciated, and I believe he was sincere when he made the remarks now being used against him.”

    Wouldn’t that be more engaging and less unnecessarily abrasive? You try.

  979. 979
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    972
    Ron Brown – He was backing Hewson, he was explaining how angry he was with Labor and Keating in 1993 about the state of the health system. He was explaining that his support of Hewson was genuine Ron, gee you can be stupid sometimes.

  980. 980
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Laurence Springers wants it back? where did you get ‘the dirt’ Steve?

  981. 981
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    So that means preferences from One Nation next election Glen?

  982. 982
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Rain was on earlier complaining about lack of Ministers from Canberra. Turns out there are four from QLD and four axed.

    Queensland has four obvious winners in the new government ministry, including Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and Treasurer Wayne Swan, but has four casualties, including shadow homeland security minister Arch Bevis.

    Mr Bevis, who won the seat of Brisbane in 1990, is currently National Vice-President of the ALP.

    Bernie Ripoll, Labor’s member for Oxley, and Kirsten Livermore, the member for Capricornia, have also lost their positions as parliamentary secretaries, while former ageing, disabilities and carers spokesperson Senator Jan McLucas is out of the revamped Rudd Ministry, which was unveiled this morning.

    Craig Emerson, the member for Rankin, keeps his responsibility for small business, becoming a minister and also becomes the minister assisting new Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner on business deregulation.

    Queensland Senator Joe Ludwig, formerly shadow attorney-general, becomes the minister for human services, an area which Mr Rudd described as “a major area of reform, yet to be addressed” in his comments today.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/queenslands-winners-and-losers/2007/11/29/1196037063371.html

  983. 983
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    “God the Health system is a mess, maybe a GP for a leader aint so bad”, says Glen. Then why was the Super Hornet, MBBS, never made health minister under Howard? Too scared of the nurses?

  984. 984
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    He was explaining that his support of Hewson was genuine Ron, gee you can be stupid sometimes.

    He supported Hewson!? HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH now that is hilarious.

  985. 985
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    Glen @ 975,

    I see that photo.

    I think Ivan Milat!

  986. 986
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    #
    977
    VoterBoy of Over the Water Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 11:30 pm

    Just listened to the 7.30 Report interview: couldn’t work out where I’d heard the voice before. Then it dawned on me; it’s Pauline Hanson.

    Pauline Nelson?

    WAS PAULINE ONE OF LORD 1/ NELSON’s 3 WIVES ???

  987. 987
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    Glen… that Ivan Milat LOL!

  988. 988
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    981
    marky marky – we get them whether we want them or not but Labor get’s preferences from the Greens so i classify the Greens with One Nation in their extremities really.

    ShowsOn Hewson got him in the Party…Mark Twain they obviously wanted to keep him down but not any longer.

  989. 989
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    987
    Aussieguru01 – although distasteful i agree he looked like a bushranger or Ivan lol! ;)

  990. 990
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    980 Springborg is getting more vocal all the time while Seeney just struggles in Parliament. I think Springborg feels he was robbed when his father died during the last campaign and he had to withdraw from the hustings.

  991. 991
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:36 pm | Permalink

    979
    Glen Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 11:31 pm

    972
    Ron Brown – He was backing Hewson

    backing Hewson ?? by saying “I have NEVER voted Liberal in my life”
    Now we know why Hewson lost …its Brendon’s fault

  992. 992
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn Hewson got him in the Party…Mark Twain they obviously wanted to keep him down but not any longer.

    Well it seems he should’ve skipped some of his lectures at the Flinders Medical Centre, and walked up the hill to the politics department. His explanation of what liberalism means on The 7:30 Report was a complete howler – he would’ve failed any first year politics class with that tripe.

  993. 993
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    The sad thing about the Queensland Libs is the lack of opposition, governments need something to push them and make them accountable and in many cases around Australia at present their is a lack of accountability and some arrogance in government, i certainly get that feeling about Brumby in Victoria at present.

  994. 994
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    ehehehehe you think Nelson is boring lol take a look.

    “PRIME minister-elect Kevin Rudd spoke uninterrupted today for a staggering 30 minutes as he unveiled his first cabinet – but at least it wasn’t in Mandarin.

    Mr Rudd almost finished after 25 minutes but remembered he had forgotten to speak about a minister – and started talking again.

    Journalists’ tape recorders began clicking off in exhaustion as Mr Rudd then took questions for another 20 minutes. ”

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22842483-952,00.html

  995. 995
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    Re Admiral’s pic -very similar but a simple check might separate them on examination – I hear Ivan Milat not only has pierced ears, but has a scrotum ring as well.

  996. 996
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    The Liberal Party of Menzies & Fraser would never preference Pauline Hanson but
    then they stood for Liberal values …forgot Howard only stood for getting votes

  997. 997
    canberra boy
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Horatio Hornet on the 7.30 Report tonight was appalling – no match for Rudd. Looks like we are shaping up for three years at least of Liberal leadership speculation. Not just Turnbull & Abbott, but Costello as well if he doesn’t leave the Parliament when his 18 years service comes up on 24 March 2008 and he reaches his maximum possible parliamentary superannuation.

  998. 998
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Ron at 855.

    ‘COMMENT on direct election of a President
    Neither party agrees because it ‘implys’ too much power in the winning President’

    Does it imply ‘power’ for the President? I thought it to be more about influence, of the decent moral kind. And our input will help Labor towards what we want, rather than what they, then or now, unknown, have in mind.

    ‘COMMENT on ’sorry’ procedure
    say ’sorry’….Howard thought it was hard but it isn’t

    ALL Aborigines & ALL other Aussies know our generation did not participate & are not responsible but that does not stop us from saying ’sorry’

    True, true. I acknowledge that it isn’t necessarily hard to say sorry. But for some it is. That is why a legislative framework is, I think, imperative.

    ‘EVEN when most of the kids were taken away by our past generations in good faith to protect them’.

    Not wishing to start a debate, so please, another day, but disagree with the good faith bit. Tony Abbott has good faith.

    Thank you, Ron.

  999. 999
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    I saw on the Chaser that a relation of Ivan Milat was going to run in the election and her preferences were going to the Libs.. Every vote counts hey Glen.

  1000. 1000
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Glen, you have the attention span of a gnat.

    If Moses was talking about the Ten Cmmandments you would only be interested in the best three.

  1001. 1001
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Our Kev may be boring, Glen, but he’s never wasted $6 billion on the Super Hornets or anything else for that matter.

    Yet!

  1002. 1002
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Glen i will agree with you on one thing when Rudd starts speaking he waffles on, i thought on election night he was unbearable, on and on about nothing, on the other hand old sneaky spoke well and was very gracious.

  1003. 1003
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    Glen quoting yet more News Ltd anti-Rudd polemic isn’t going to cut any ice here. We’ve had a whole year of that shite and no-one believes a word of it. (Has Caroline Overington been sacked yet?)

  1004. 1004
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:42 pm | Permalink

    994 And you thought the Liberals were going to keep him accountable. It’s a new era Glen, it is a new league that the Liberal Party and the journalists will struggle to keep up with.

  1005. 1005
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:43 pm | Permalink

    #
    1000
    Greensborough Growler Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 11:40 pm

    Glen, you have the attention span of a gnat.

    If Moses was talking about the Ten Cmmandments you would only be interested in the best three.

    Only one of them mentioned “you shall ensure Howard loses his seat”

  1006. 1006
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    Adam,

    Has there been anything anywhere from Overington since Saturday?

  1007. 1007
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:45 pm | Permalink

    1001
    Marktwain – he hardly wasted 6b dollars, SuperHornets are good aircraft, the US still uses them as Aircraft Carrier jets.

    Oh and last time i checked Lord Nelson doesn’t like eating ear wax lol ;)

    1003
    Adam – this isnt being critical of his policies just that he waffles on and on about working families and the like he doesnt get to the point i mean he’s going to have to get used to this because he’s only had to ask questions in Parliament not answer them.

  1008. 1008
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:47 pm | Permalink

    Agree Adam …the ‘oz’ is very similar to ‘fox News” in the USA also owned by Murdoch….very ‘right wing’

    except George Mega who I find logically critical of both Partys

  1009. 1009
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    I hope unlike the Victorian Parliament Labor and the Howard Government, Labor uses HOR responsibly and answers the questions because really the Howard Government treated the house with contempt.

  1010. 1010
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    Marky, good luck if Keating wasn’t going to do it why will Rudd?

  1011. 1011
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    except George Mega who I find logically critical of both Partys

    The Australian lost its best writer on Sunday… :-|

  1012. 1012
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:49 pm | Permalink

    All I can say Glen is that the Tories had better learn to run on two or three hours sleep. If the Tories bludge along at the rate they have this year Rudd will eat them for breakfast and they will never be able to handle him.

  1013. 1013
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Steve, I have a soft spot for old LS because he do’es have a genuine sincerity about himself. Pity about the rest of his crew!

  1014. 1014
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    Kiddies, the evil Oz just won this …

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Haneef-story-gets-Thomas-a-Gold-Walkley/2007/11/29/1196037077365.html

  1015. 1015
    Nico
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    What an election:

    1. Conservative winter over.
    2. Howard got what he deserved.
    3. Overington gets herself fired.

    Trifecta!

  1016. 1016
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:51 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately I have no faith any Party will remedy the appalling question time in the Reps. Actually the Senate under both Labor & Liberal Governments have been a lot better

  1017. 1017
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Marky, good luck if Keating wasn’t going to do it why will Rudd?

    Keating used Question Time brilliantly, he wouldn’t of won the 1993 election without it.

  1018. 1018
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:52 pm | Permalink

    Shows on. Has Mega George left the ‘GG’?

  1019. 1019
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Shows on. Has Mega George left the ‘GG’?

    I think he’s referring to the death of Matt Price :-(

  1020. 1020
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    1014
    Marktwain Says:
    November 29th, 2007 at 11:50 pm

    Kiddies, the evil Oz just won this …

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/National/Han

    That is 31 winners
    Fancy having 31 ‘Brownlow’ medal winners OR 31 ‘Daly M’ winners

  1021. 1021
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    Unfortunately I have no faith any Party will remedy the appalling question time in the Reps.

    It is nothing but theatre, always has been, always will be.

    Shows on. Has Mega George left the ‘GG’?

    No. I was referring to the passing of Matt Price.

  1022. 1022
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:55 pm | Permalink

    Fantastic work, Hedley Thomas, again.

    See what pushing on an issue can achieve?

    Is Overington fired?

    Back shortly. Hard drive full.

  1023. 1023
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Talking about Murdoch, Kenneth Davison in The Age wrote an interesting piece regarding Rupert when he said and i quote
    Murdoch gets his power by owning two thirds of Australia’s capital city daily news paper circulation and is reinforced by the gullibility of our politicians.
    Rudd is no exception. After Murdoch run a blatant campaign in favor of the coaltion it failed to shift public opinion. Therefore Murdoch editoralised on the eve to support Labor in three of his most influential papers, to ensure he backed the winner.
    In return Rudd has indicated he will willingly support much of his agenda. It remains to be seen how much transalates into commercial advantage for News Ltd.
    ( The Age, Monday 26 November, Page 6, Business Section).

  1024. 1024
    Ron Brown
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:57 pm | Permalink

    Correction
    The only 2 even writers at the ‘oz’ were George Mega & Matt Price ( a sad loss)

  1025. 1025
    steve
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

    Glen, look and weep.

    THE HOWARD Government’s controversial decision to go against the advice of Australia’s air force chiefs and buy 24 Super Hornet fighter jets is likely to be investigated by the Commonwealth Auditor-General.

    Ian McPhee said he would consider examining the circumstances surrounding Defence Minister Brendan Nelson’s decision to spend $6.6 billion on the Super Hornets. If he did investigate, it would be in the 2008-09 financial year.

    In response to a request for an investigation from Opposition defence spokesman Joel Fitzgibbon, Mr McPhee said the Super Hornets were a major defence aquisition. If an investigation were held, it would focus on governance issues related to the decision to buy the jets.

    Last November, Dr Nelson stunned RAAF chiefs when he told cabinet’s National Security Committee that Australia needed to buy an interim fighter to ensure a “capability gap” did not emerge between the 2010 retirement of the F-111 fighter bomber and the 2013 arrival of the Joint Strike Fighter from the US.

    Just weeks earlier, the nation’s two most senior air chiefs said an interim aircraft such as the F/A-18 Super Hornet was not necessary.

    http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2007/08/05/1186252546263.html?s_cid=rss_

  1026. 1026
    Marktwain
    Posted Thursday, November 29, 2007 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    Correct, Ron Brown, and most of the winners are photographers. Picture tells a thousand words, I think the saying goes. We journos really are up ourselves.

    That being said, Thomas’ series on Haneef was good. Balanced out the absolute tripe his Newsie colleague, Paula Doneman, did on the “SHOCK TERRORIST PHOTOS OF GOLD COAST APARTMENT BLOCK AND GLORIOUS OCEAN VIEWS” scuppered scoop. That was hilarious. Not.

  1027. 1027
    Ron Brown
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    Very cynical of 3 Murdoch papers to support Rudd on election eve …AFTER producing a negative Labor presentation during the campaign

  1028. 1028
    Ed the Pseph
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:00 am | Permalink

    How disappointing that the likes of Nelson, Bishop and Haase will go down in history having voted against the sorry to the stolen generation people. It will happen soon enough anyway regardless of their good or ill will. What a mean bunch. By the way some of these stolen generation people have actually been enormous contributors to our society despite the damage done in their childhoods.

  1029. 1029
    jaundiced view
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:02 am | Permalink

    1009 Marky -[ I hope unlike the Victorian Parliament Labor and the Howard Government, Labor uses HOR responsibly and answers the questions because really the Howard Government treated the house with contempt.]

    They did indeed treat the House with contempt – continuing a trend begun under the previous Labor govt it must be said, but the extent to which it was taken over the past 11 years is not comparable.

    Generally though – we can go on about personalities and details, but the main game now is – can the Rudd govt bring back the ‘fair go’? Can they bring back more of our lost laconic egalitarian atmosphere that can reduce the difference between the poorest group and the richest? They have not started well in education policy, which is where this starts, and will continue the obscenity of open slather for first-start religious schools apparently. If any area needs a rethink and a good dose of leadership, it’s this one. No-one here can applaud the ‘education revolution’ if any mug group of freaks can continue to apply for and get govt money to start a new school. This has been going on for not quite 11 years, but for a good part of it. If anything will hasten the classification of Aussie society it will be a failure by the new Govt to fix that. I know they won’t cancel state aid, but the rort of the start-ups and the excesses of across-the-board subsidies must go.

    Whew, sorry about the rant.

  1030. 1030
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:02 am | Permalink

    Ron- Murdoch gets governments and ousts them except Hewson in 1993 and Kennett 1999 he gets all governments to do what he wants.

  1031. 1031
    Ron Brown
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:05 am | Permalink

    example of Murdoch bias:

    the $420 million ‘regional rorts affair” did NOT get published in the Melbourne sun at all

    the $281 million tax payer funded work choices adds got no lead articles

    the AMA in Tassie repeatedly said the mersey hospital transfer could not go ahead
    as there were not enough speciaists

    the WA union leader expelled in the campaign got front page in the Melbourne Sun

    etc

    but Garretts joke got headlines despite a channel 9 witness supporting Garrett version

  1032. 1032
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:07 am | Permalink

    WTF is going on in McEwan. No up date for 2 days. Everything, something or nothing is going on.

  1033. 1033
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    Very little about Jackie Kelly Gaffe in the Melbourne Papers as well and for memory not on front page of Australian.

  1034. 1034
    steve
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    Glen just for the record here is the Australians take on the Super Hornet wasteful scam from Nelson.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,21342853-31477,00.html

  1035. 1035
    red wombat
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    Hahahahahaha….me first

    Thanks for voting, here are the results so far:

    Do you think Brendan Nelson will male a good opposition leader?

    Yes
    0% (0 votes)
    No
    100% (1 vot

  1036. 1036
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:09 am | Permalink

    For those who are not clued up on this ‘Nelson” terminology please go here -
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nelson_hold

  1037. 1037
    Ron Brown
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:10 am | Permalink

    #
    1033
    marky marky Says:
    November 30th, 2007 at 12:08 am

    Very little about Jackie Kelly Gaffe in the Melbourne Papers as well and for memory not on front page of Australian.

    You are 100% right

    As you say the bias is not only what is written but also what storys are omited

  1038. 1038
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:12 am | Permalink

    Try not to read his papers, never buy them, just look at headlines. But Murdoch is the person who inhibits change for the better in this country and it is time our governments did something about his influence.

  1039. 1039
    jaundiced view
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:12 am | Permalink

    1033 – they must have quarantined it to Sydney – the Sydney Tele had plenty of it. I wish I’d known the full reporting picture because I upped my forecast of ALP seats from 100 to 104 on the back of the Lindsay spectacular!

  1040. 1040
    steve
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:15 am | Permalink

    Oh Dear, Trouble in paradise for the Federal Opposition!

    THE Queensland Nationals have thrown another match into the firestorm engulfing conservative politics, threatening yesterday to walk away from the federal Coalition.

    At the end of a week which has upended the national political landscape, Nationals powerbrokers will meet today to discuss their radical threat to effectively create a new party in Federal Parliament if maverick Queensland Senator Barnaby Joyce is not promoted.

    Meanwhile the state Liberal Party remains deadlocked over its leadership options as Bruce Flegg continues to defy the wishes of the executive and refuses to quit.

    And the federal Liberal Party is set for a testing time under its new leader Brendan Nelson, who yesterday edged out ambitious former minister Malcolm Turnbull after also seeing off a challenge from another former frontbencher Tony Abbott – who vowed to be back. Dr Nelson dodged questions about how he and new deputy Julie Bishop would guarantee stability in the party, after winning the leadership ballot by only three votes from Mr Turnbull.

    “Well, you will just have to watch and see what I do and how I do it,” Dr Nelson said.

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22844647-952,00.html

  1041. 1041
    jaundiced view
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:19 am | Permalink

    By the way – it wasn’t a Jackie Kelly ‘gaffe’ – it was the NSW organisation caught red-handed in what they have been doing for some years – breaking the law and every moral and ethical standard through false publications associating their rivals with bad things such as terrorism.

  1042. 1042
    Aussieguru01
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:20 am | Permalink

    A week is along time in politics. Remember a week ago the Lindsay scandal was all over the media. I never realised how much of a bimbo Jackie Kelly really is.
    Today we got a new cabinet ready to be sworn in & a opposition falling like 10 pin. How sweet it is!

  1043. 1043
    Ron Brown
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:20 am | Permalink

    4 Corners did a program on the Super hornets and its replacement the F35
    The progam suggested that australia has had air superiority for 60 years but when the F35 arrives it will be inferior to the russian supplied equivalent many Asian countrys have ordered

    leaving us for the first time in our history from 2012 lacking air superiority. The US airforce have another fighter 9think F25) which is the best in the world but will not sell it except to Israel

  1044. 1044
    Glen
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    Ron Brown the F-18 Super Hornets are stop gaps, ie extra defence until we receive our 100 or so F-35s. You are critical of buying F-35s but if the US wont sell us F-22s what are we to do buy Russian aircraft no thankyou!

  1045. 1045
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Friday, November 30, 2007 at 12:23 am | Permalink

    Neilbris at 921.

    Your post appeared when I resumed.

    SORRY! Re read it. Gotcha!

  1046. 1046