Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Morgan: 59-41

Morgan has simultaneously released results of face-to-face polling conducted over the previous two weekends, and a phone poll conducted on Wednesday and Thursday. The former has Labor leading 49 per cent to 36 per cent on the primary vote and 59-41 on two-party preferred, compared with 61.5-38.5 at the previous such poll a fortnight earlier; the latter has Labor’s leads at 50 per cent to 34.5 per cent and 60-40, compared with 63-37 last week. In other news, political parties’ financial disclosure returns for 2006/07 have been published by the Australian Electoral Commission: Steven Mayne sifts through the evidence at Crikey (subscriber only).

302 Comments

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 57 » Show All

  1. 51
    Crikey Whitey
    Posted Friday, February 1, 2008 at 11:50 pm | Permalink

    As a matter of interest, Gusface, when was Bushfire Bill’s piece posted and under what thread, do you know?

    I ask in the interests of William’s lost archival week. Which may have occurred when you were in the gulag and unable to post.

    Maybe you have everything?

  2. 52
    gusface
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:14 am | Permalink

    CW
    06/03/07 on ozpolitics 56/44 newspoll thread comment by BB responding to various plots imagined by glen etc

    no not every comment -only the pearlers (though my h/d was wiped ) my kids clunker (runs 95 BION) had quite a few saved pages/posts/emails

  3. 53
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    If we then look at the booth results there were many swings of 15-20% in workers areas in the suburbs and in industrial rural towns, but in the middle/upper class booths there was 0-5%. Indded in the classic doctors wives booth of Hunters Hill there was a small swing to the Libs.

    The figures tell me that that the union campaign was very effective in returning the Howard battlers to the ALP. The Libs campaign was very effective at scaring back the shopkeepers and the ALP campaign sucked yet again.

    Some interesting points. I agree, the ALP campaign wasn’t spectacular, it was simply a matter of the Coalition being worse.

    The union campaign in Melbourne was largely targeted toward middle-class Deakin, which just got over the line. (Interestingly, in nearby Box Hill, almost every Asian store, bar one or two Coalition restaurants, had ALP posters up). On the other hand, the unions didn’t turn up in the parts of Melbourne that are genuinely poor (i.e. Broadmeadows, Sunshine, Dandenong, Lalor) yet these places voted ALP in an absolutely massive way.
    Also, up in the NT, the Coalition was lucky to break into double figures in some booths. It says something about the ‘intervention’, in my opinion.

  4. 54
    Nototaxcuts
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:39 am | Permalink

    ”Didn’t matter a jot how out of touch the Howard government had become nor how incompetent the Coalition’s election campaign turned out (except for all the bribes for Howard’s solidly loyal base such as the private schools), Labor still couldn’t even crack 53%.”

    Maybe this is the result of the Cold war? So many Labor voters started voting Liberal/National/DLP after 1954, and their sons and grandsons continue to do the same now?

  5. 55
    Meng Tan
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    So, there was a narrowing, and poor hopeless Labor couldn’t crack 53%.
    In fact, the Coalition didn’t really lose, they just came second …

  6. 56
    slartybardfast
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 7:37 am | Permalink

    Gusface, thank so for finding that
    Bushfire, that was brillant,have a cookie

  7. 57
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    Professor Higgins @ 46,

    Go to Youtube, type in My Fair Lady and scroll down till you find it.

    Cheers

  8. 58
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    ahh-
    memories of those golden pre-election days. Except Howard was still pm.
    Does anyone knopw how Glen(s) repsonded to BB’s brilliant piece?
    Quietly I would have guessed.

  9. 59
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:50 am | Permalink

    From memory, he ignored it.

    Glen’s moved on since then. He donated his pieces of paper, his Spiderman coloring-in book and his plastic scissors to Don D’Cruz at IPA, who has since made good use of them.

    “MASTER PLAN—–Threaten backing anti-W/Choices legisltn/ Business crawls bk to Lbrl/Prty / begs frgvness./Nelson hero/PM 2011./JST KIDDING!!!! [He! He!]/Alwys knew he cld do it./Mnwhle trap KRUDD in own web by making nice to Union thugs/ Cause CHAOS in ecomony [chk. spl???]/”IN CONFUSION IS PROFIT”/Ha! Ha! Maybe can strt wear ear-ring again???? No… too much like Lbrl/Prty election ad… msn’t scare horses/little chldrn /ladies in Wahroonga… “

  10. 60
    Basil Fawlty
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:57 am | Permalink

    Yes Bushfire, I recall that piece too, classic, had me in stitches at the time. Have you thought about making it into a tv series :-)

  11. 61
    Basil Fawlty
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 9:59 am | Permalink

    But somehow you have gotta weave his first love Julie Bishop into the plot, dominatrix in black leather perhaps!

  12. 62
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Kevinism charms China?

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23146978-601,00.html

  13. 63
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:25 am | Permalink

    BB-
    are you suggesting that (gulp) The Glen’s could be Nelson???????

  14. 64
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Basil-
    eeeyew ,as my 8 yr old would say.

  15. 65
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    its my fault Jen why Glen is not around much

    A few nights ago He & I had a spirited debate about the Libs current leadership
    and proceeded to denigrate Juli Bishop’s leadership skills vs Julia

    at the time I was oblivious to Glen’s love for Julie Bishop

    Glen is hurt his love star was criticised & I’m now very remorseful

  16. 66
    zoom
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Ron, don’t beat yourself up too much about it.
    Glen’s having a hard time at present, and it’s made him a tad over sensitive.
    (BTW, where did this fascinating exchange take place? I seem to have missed it).

  17. 67
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    Ron.
    You should never mock such tender and true love. Shame on you. I myself have a similar but as yat unrequited passion for George Clooney.

  18. 68
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    thx Zoom , but my conscience over the Glen & Julie affair is bothering

  19. 69
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Oh look. it’s Horatio Hornet with his telescope to his bad eye as the monstrous history of black Australia looms up close to him. Can he see it? Apparently not very well, even if Malcolm can.

    In his inimitable style, and quoting slabs of that ‘gin rooter’ Xavier Herbert, Ramsay lashes Nelson to the mast and sails him through the straits of black and white histoy with the moral siren’s wailing:

    http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/weasel-words-wont-hide-monstrous-shame/2008/02/01/1201801034773.html

    …and Horatio still can’t seem to see it.

    Lashed to his pole, (let’s call it the “White Armband” pole, so greatly championed by his moral midget predecessor) Horatio Hornet will have plenty of time to think about the other polls, and wonder why he’s still stuck at the bottom them.

    But not for long. He’s headed for the rocks and the second in command will have no compunction in casting Admiral Hornet to the fishes.

  20. 70
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    but the crew ca not find ‘Turn on the Bull’ because he’s painted himself ‘black’
    to win the indigenous vote

  21. 71
    Basil Fawlty
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Jen, George Clooney in black leather, naaah.

  22. 72
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    Jen , if George knew such a fine’green’ damsel as thou was on this site , he would forsake McCain in a flash & support our Obama

  23. 73
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    RON.
    Don’t tell me that George is supporting McCain!!! I was sure that he wsa a died-in the-wool Democrat.
    My heart is broken … sob.

    And Basil – infinitely preferrable to Julie Bishop.

  24. 74
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    Jen…I was merely highlighting how much George would swoon to such a fine ‘green ‘ damsel to cheer her heart…… IF he’d been a Republican

    but you can rest easy , his mind & heart is with you ‘figuratively’

  25. 75
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    Ron,
    I wish.

  26. 76
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    Kirribilli -
    are you bringing your opponents with you, or has ESJ buggered off?

  27. 77
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    and Basil’s idea of black leather was the FINAL straw where I with great regret
    broke Glen’s heart over Julie Bishop

    I’m ashamed to admit I said to glen re his Julie love

    even dolly downer in ghis black stockings would be sexier than julie

    …how could I jen

  28. 78
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    76
    Jen

    Who can tell Jen? Last night he picked up his wet lettuce and ran home to mommy (for a good thrashing one supposes!).

    He’ll probably pop up, wet lettuce in hand, waving it and snarling, but he’s so completely hot air it’s just amusing (mildly).

    Talk about having deep pyschological problems and being let out in public!

    One should pity, but hey, the tosser asks for everything he gets.

  29. 79
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 11:59 am | Permalink

    Ron,
    I would have to agree with you on the Downer/Bishop camparison.
    (I’ve always had a bit of a thing for Alex: – perhaps it’s striking resemblance to George C.)

  30. 80
    Greeensborough Growler
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Actually, this is not so much a test of Nelson’s leadership but more the followship within the non Labor side of politics. If Nelson can get his side to agree to the wording of a meaningful apology, then it is a great outcome for Australia. He will have made a valuable contribution to confronting a nasty side of our progress as a nation and give us all the opportunity to move on.

    This is far too important an issue to be bogged down in petty party politics and puerile point scoring by the commentariat.

    To me an apology needs to be heartfelt and unconditional. An apology decided on Party lines should not be the aim here.

    Good luck Dr Nelson.

  31. 81
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    Not to mention his Richard Burton-like voice.
    Used to have me swooning in his lateline interviews.
    God, I miss him.

  32. 82
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    I can almost understand why Jen

    Dolly announced yesterdat he’ll be will be doing peaking tours in his black stockings for his fans so perhaps you can get a ticket before they all sell out

  33. 83
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Alright GG-
    back to a serious matter:
    Nelson’s equivocation and non-committment to the Apology to indigeneous Australians is a complete rerun of the Howard goverment’s appalling attitude to this issue by appealing to the base elements of parochialism and racism.(’they’ll want to take our land and bleed us dry with compensation claims. And anyway – we were just doing what was best for them, the ingrates’).
    Wouldhave though the libs would have got the message by now.

  34. 84
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    82
    Ron

    Dolly “peaking”?

    hmmm, I’d pay to see that!

  35. 85
    Kirribilli Removals
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:13 pm | Permalink

    83
    Jen

    It’s pretty bottom of the barrell stuff, but that’s where poor Horatio finds himself, with most of his support from the sludge-meisters, and he can’t ignore their grip on him.

    Oh, how deliciously sad for the admiral.

  36. 86
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    Well at least the Admiral is getting ‘advice’ from the whispering article clerk

    so Horatio now knows its gotta come from the heart…..what inspirational words

  37. 87
    onimod
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    Nelson – what a leader…
    Faced with the prospect of a lack of support he throws his hands up in the air so he can claim ‘wasn’t my fault’ later.
    I don’t doubt that a large part of the population doesn’t want Sorry, but has Abbott not worked out that these hot heads change their political support at the drop of a hat to support their own selfish status quo?
    The inability to avoid the wedge, even when it’s pointing directly at them, is intellectually laughable.

  38. 88
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    Nelson/Leader?
    Hahahahhahhahhah

  39. 89
    onimod
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    maybe Nelson should be referred to as LP ’spokesman’.
    Skokesman – you know, the guy corporations employ to announce and take the shit from the press…

  40. 90
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    89
    personally, I like The Lamb-
    as in sacrificial.

  41. 91
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    onimod , you seek to see a leader in the Admiral but all there is is pebbles of sand blowing in the wind

    with Spiderman building his fire for Jen’s lamb sacrificial

  42. 92
    onimod
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    90
    you mean the stuff that should have been consumed on Australia Day.
    hahaha.
    Nelson reminds me of the ‘good looking vacuous guy’ type used in US sitcoms – pretty harmless and seemingly oblivious to the laughs he causes. J Bishop is the corresponding dumb blonde. I’m struggling to find the smart geeky boy/girl who always saves the day – it’s definitely not Aquaman. I don’t think this show will get much past pilot stage.

    It seems pretty obvious to me – Kev needs to clean up education, and fast, and then hang on till the kids get through. Seeing Oz follow a European civilisation trend by a decade or more it’s really not hard to work out what the next move is.
    Where was Kev posted and for how long….?

  43. 93
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    onimod
    Vacuous, yes, but Good Looking?????
    As my 8 year old would say….

  44. 94
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    onimod , yep …you have soundly defined the Admiral’s “qualitys”

    yes Jen that ‘good looking’ can only apply to your George

    must fly for a while…enjoy your afternoon fellow spirits

  45. 95
    onimod
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    I said he played the type – not that it fitted perfectly…
    As I also said – I think this one’s over after pilot season, or should be…
    The problem with politics is that’s it’s not rational – the population at large reads so much more into these people than they can possible contain themselves.

    The thing that gets me – I think I’ve raised it here before – is who the hell is advising these guys?
    Why in a nation of 300 million can’t George W find a speech writer?
    Why in a nation of 20 million can’t the liberals make a friend with someone who drinks a couple of pints in a pub on Friday afternoons?

  46. 96
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    onimod-
    because he’s a liberal.
    circular aargument.

  47. 97
    nath
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    The next election is shaping up nicely for a Brackslide.

  48. 98
    onimod
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    http://petermartin.blogspot.com/2008/02/saturday-forum-labor-whose-party-is-it.html

    No wonder Julia had the confidence to beat up on the limp celery during the campaign…
    No wonder they were so shameless in exploiting the public advertising budget…
    I do wonder why it took the ALP so long to get organised though.

  49. 99
    MGM
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 3:09 pm | Permalink

    Is there aby truth at all to the rumour that Nelson wants to try and emulate Rudd’s “Kevin 07″ campaign and is planning on running wtih the slogan “Bren 10″?

  50. 100
    Jen
    Posted Saturday, February 2, 2008 at 3:11 pm | Permalink

    99
    as in: he thinks he’ll still be the leader in 2 years?
    Hahahahhahahahahahhahahhahahhhahhahahahhahahah

Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 57 » Show All