Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Washington, Wisconsin, Hawaii

The last significant presidential primaries until March 4 will be held tomorrow our time: primaries in Wisconsin and Washington for both parties, plus caucuses in Hawaii for the Democrats. Discuss them at your leisure here.

868 Comments

Pages: « 112 13 [14] 15 1618 » Show All

  1. 651
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    What a sham. Hillary surely knows she can not win (as JWH knew at APEC).
    Pollies art good with numbers about themselves

    But the ‘political thing’ to do is to make concession based on not having big wins in Ohio and/or Texas. Who actually believes this ’spin’ except the most loyal of supporters.

    But yes, Hillary will do the ‘political thing’. of course if the Polls go pear shaped for her in the interim as I expect , & Ohio & Texas end up respectively as a small Ciinton win & a Clinton loss….where is the graceful exit except in her mind.

    She had her chance for legendary status & as expected spurned it. Given the same Stats in reverse plus the current National stats showing Clinton loses to McCain in a landslide would Obama continue to fight on. Think not

  2. 652
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    davidoff
    - are you saying that the War Hero “did not have sex with that woman” (ah, the irony), or are you saying that they can’t prove it –
    and do they need to??

  3. 653
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    #650

    So what choice do they have?

    Stay home!
    After all, the CIA would class this under the category of plausible deniability.

  4. 654
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    #652
    I’m suggesting a line something along the line of “I could not have had sex with that woman” backed up by a mountain of medical evidence.

  5. 655
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    654 davidoff-
    have you not heard of Viagra??

  6. 656
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    654- davidoff
    have you not heard of Viagra?

  7. 657
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    But with Hillary’s health care plan … maybe he could!

  8. 658
    The Finnigans
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    #650 – Jen – It’s going to get worse. I knew this had to come. Try google “barack obama antichrist”.

  9. 659
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    I’ve been moderated!
    and all I did was mention a perfectly legal pharmaceutical.
    Sometimes William is so harsh.

  10. 660
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    It’s OK-
    Released from the Gulag.

  11. 661
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    I don’t “moderate” people. Comments go into moderation if they include certain words, without any action on my part.

  12. 662
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:35 pm | Permalink

    659
    jen Says:
    February 23rd, 2008 at 5:33 pm
    I’ve been moderated!
    and all I did was mention a perfectly legal pharmaceutical.
    Sometimes William is so harsh.

    thats why we need a Blogosphere Appeals Court to adjudicate Williams harsh decisions

  13. 663
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:36 pm | Permalink

    #659
    Jen
    I thought it was implicit!
    LOL

  14. 664
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    At least since jen you’ve logged in , the US election discussion has gone up market….despite Williams judical decision without Appeal

  15. 665
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:41 pm | Permalink

    Apologies Wiliam.
    But why would that V word be moderated when the other one might get through?(haven’t tried it yet I must admit).

  16. 666
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Hi Ron -
    glad to have raised the tone. (have to say that is not something I’m usually credited with.)

  17. 667
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    #664
    Ron
    Your suggesting that William should lower the standard if Jen is logged in?
    Shame on you!

  18. 668
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:48 pm | Permalink

    Info from inside Camp Clinton:

    According to the adviser and donor, Hillary advisers are telling people — when they’re sounding optimistic tones designed to sooth jittery donors — that the campaign’s internal polling shows her up over five points in her key firewall states of Ohio and Texas.

    “The lowest number I’ve heard from them is eight,” the donor tells me. The campaign won’t publicly discuss such numbers for fear of creating unrealistic expectations.

    The adviser and donor tell me that the argument being made from inside is that if she can win both those states by between five and 10 points, she can at least begin to close Obama’s lead in pledged delegates to within somewhat more manageable numbers.

    http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/hillary_advisers_privately_rea.php

  19. 669
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    668
    Davidoff-
    ” ‘Too Late’,she cried.”

  20. 670
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    :-)

  21. 671
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    665
    jen Says:
    February 23rd, 2008 at 5:41 pm
    Apologies Wiliam.
    But why would that V word be moderated when the other one might get through?(haven’t tried it yet I must admit).

    This is EXACTLY WHY a Blogosphere Appeals Court is needed ,
    perhaps made of three esteemed blogers.

    Clearly that excludes me , however you Jen would be a worthy President of same

  22. 672
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Stone the bloody(Jim) crows! Have a squiz at this:

    TX: Obi, 57 HRC 43
    http://www.decisionanalyst.com/publ_data/2008/obama.dai

    Seems them Coen boys wuz right all along.
    Texas is definately No Country for Old(er) (wo)Men.

    Sorry, Monica and Jen it’s a cheap shot I know, but after those figures, momentarily stunned, it just slipped out.
    Mr. Chigurh made me do it!

  23. 673
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Cheers Ron,
    although perhaps you overestimate my censoring abilities.
    I’d let everything through except Glen , GP and ESJ, so that would reduce this site to a bunch of centrists and lefties. And then what would we talk about?

  24. 674
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    #672
    Enemy Combatant
    There is also the ARG poll.
    http://www.americanresearchgroup.com/pres08/txdem8-702.html

  25. 675
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    ah , but we still talk about them in loving terms so to speak Jen ,
    its just we’d miss their reasoned responses

  26. 676
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:06 pm | Permalink

    672 – EC
    If I was Hillary
    I’d have ‘done r-u-n-n-o-f-t’.

  27. 677
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    The Donor & the Insider:
    ” IF blah blah blah….then she can at least begin to close Obama’s lead in pledged delegates to within somewhat more manageable numbers.”

    …..and then ?

    a ’spin’ upon a ’spin’ within a ’spin’ gives us what Davidoff

  28. 678
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    I’d let everything through except Glen , GP and ESJ, so that would reduce this site to a bunch of centrists and lefties.

    Works for me – but you have a point – with Glen , GP and ESJ you loose the option of feeling superior and without that how are you going to move those screaming lefties over to the centre?

  29. 679
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    s/with/without

  30. 680
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:11 pm | Permalink

    a ’spin’ upon a ’spin’ within a ’spin’ gives us what Davidoff

    A fairytale?

  31. 681
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Here is an article I liked – getting into (in a real way) the Clinton Obama dilemma. The article is basically about recent events (phone calls and stuff) around William Blaine Richardson III AKA Bill Richardson (one of the Democrat presidential candidates who withdrew from the race).

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/23/us/politics/23richardson.html?ref=politics

  32. 682
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:28 pm | Permalink

    davidoff at 672, even if one “splits the difference” The Kid still comes out in front by 7 points. I’m not a stats-whiz or a pseph-head but the two sample sizes were roughly the same. One claims 90% confidence, the other 95% confidence.

    What is a known known (geez I don’t miss that bastard) is that the trend big picture-wise shows Obi baby is coming home like, well an expression I used a couple of weeks back, a runaway train!

  33. 683
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    #682
    Yep – my view as well. Given polling trends over in the States – I’m using these as trend indicators and that’s all. The ARG poll just adds to the feeling that things are a changing. The Texas polls seem to be doing what I expected – but I’m still worried somewhat about Ohio. There is not a lot of info out there but I’m wondering if I have overestimated Hillary’s lead.

  34. 684
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    she’s toast.

  35. 685
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    she’s so blunt – *blush*

  36. 686
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    sorry davidoff,
    but I’m not one to mince words.
    Unlike some of our worth opponents who talk nothing but mince.

  37. 687
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:54 pm | Permalink

    I’m ok with the idea of ‘toast’ – thing is I’m not at all sure how the entire transition from stale bread to toast will be managed in a way we would refer to as competent and complete taking into account the full suite of heath and occupational safety regulations.

  38. 688
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    The Polls for reasons stated previuosly continue to under estimate Obama’s vote
    in my opinion.

    There was movement at the station & Texas was gone & Ohio slipping
    and there is more time to make it uglier

  39. 689
    Diogenes
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    davidoff- If you look at those figures, it’s the independents who will kill Billary off in Texas and there are lots of them coz there’s no point voting in the moot Repug primary. As many of us have said, Texas is going to Billary’s Alamo.

  40. 690
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:04 pm | Permalink

    Two political pundits are sitting under a shady tree, leaning back against the trunk. Each pundit peels a banana, examines it meaningfully, takes a bite and commences to munch. The steady rhythm of mastication is broken with the following exchange.

    First Pundit: Seems The Kid sure has got some momentum goin’ for him, Chuck.

    Second Pundit: You know, Dave, it’s not JUST about the momentum……(chomp, chomp) for me……(further chomping)….. it goes WAY beyond that.

    (Apologies to Gary Larsen.)

  41. 691
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    672
    Enemy Combatant Says:
    February 23rd, 2008 at 6:01 pm

    Texas: Obama, 57 HRC 43
    http://www.decisionanalyst.com/publ_data/2008/obama.dai

    Not sure anyone would take that 57/43 Poll seriously.
    Thats not to say Obama won’t win Texas but 57/43 now is fairytale stuff

  42. 692
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    EC -
    and then John Goodman, cleverly disguised as Dan T, rips off a branch and smashes one of them in the face, and then runs off with the votes.

  43. 693
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    and ‘chads’

  44. 694
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    yes, Ron, those figures have an aura of FantasyLand about them, but we really musn’t forget that at the end of the day, in the fullness of time, the reality is, that it’s Americans we’re dealing with here. Texan and Ohioan Americans.

    Some of whom I’d like to quickly mention are amongst of my very best friends. You bet!

    Jen, Dan T? Even had a quick wiki-google and drew a blank.

  45. 695
    Ron
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:36 pm | Permalink

    yes Enemy , and the irony is that Texas will sink Hillary’s campaign
    and yet neither Hillary or Obama have any hope at all of winning Texas in Nov.

  46. 696
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    EC-
    O Brother Where Art Thou.

  47. 697
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 8:05 pm | Permalink

    Thank you, ma’am. Been a while, must rent the DVD and have another gander. Charles During is my favourite movie weasel.

  48. 698
    Enemy Combatant
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 8:08 pm | Permalink

    That’s Durning, and he was, until Aton Chigurh popped up for a spot of bovver.

  49. 699
    jen
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Ron @ 685
    Who then?

  50. 700
    Posted Saturday, February 23, 2008 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    If Texas is really “no country for old man” then maybe Obama will make history and win it off McCain in November.

Pages: « 112 13 [14] 15 1618 » Show All