<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACNielsen: 54-46</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:13:18 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MDMConnell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-173091</link>
		<dc:creator>MDMConnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-173091</guid>
		<description>#67,68

If Oakeshott contests Lyne, Labor could just organise to leave Port Mac vacant until the Lyne by-election has been run. If Oakeshott lost, he could then re-nominate and probably win Port Mac, thus preventing the Coalition from gaining a state seat. 

Also, from what I understand, Oakeshott is considered by some to be a de-facto Liberal. Is it possible he could run for Lyne (or Port Mac for that matter) under the Libs&#039; banner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#67,68</p>
<p>If Oakeshott contests Lyne, Labor could just organise to leave Port Mac vacant until the Lyne by-election has been run. If Oakeshott lost, he could then re-nominate and probably win Port Mac, thus preventing the Coalition from gaining a state seat. </p>
<p>Also, from what I understand, Oakeshott is considered by some to be a de-facto Liberal. Is it possible he could run for Lyne (or Port Mac for that matter) under the Libs&#8217; banner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum Comitatus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-173090</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum Comitatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-173090</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good question about Port Macquarie. It seems more Liberal than National these days, but in any hypothetical of Oakeshott leaving and a by-election being called - whether the State Coalition parties would fight out a three cornered contest is debatable.

If it was a three way, my guess is the Libs would win - probably beat the Nats by about 5-10% on primaries before running away with it in TPP terms over Labor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good question about Port Macquarie. It seems more Liberal than National these days, but in any hypothetical of Oakeshott leaving and a by-election being called &#8211; whether the State Coalition parties would fight out a three cornered contest is debatable.</p>
<p>If it was a three way, my guess is the Libs would win &#8211; probably beat the Nats by about 5-10% on primaries before running away with it in TPP terms over Labor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swordfish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-173088</link>
		<dc:creator>Swordfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 03:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-173088</guid>
		<description>Possum - Stoner would be taking a big gamble as he is almost sure to be the next NSW Deputy Premier, and it is unlikely he would get a shot at being Deputy PM for quite some time - he&#039;d be spending even more time in Opposition (I don&#039;t think he was in state parliament when Greiner/Fahey were around).

It may well be that is pushed into it for the sake of the party/sense of duty or whatever.

Also, if Oakeshott does run - would Port Macquarie revert to being National?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possum &#8211; Stoner would be taking a big gamble as he is almost sure to be the next NSW Deputy Premier, and it is unlikely he would get a shot at being Deputy PM for quite some time &#8211; he&#8217;d be spending even more time in Opposition (I don&#8217;t think he was in state parliament when Greiner/Fahey were around).</p>
<p>It may well be that is pushed into it for the sake of the party/sense of duty or whatever.</p>
<p>Also, if Oakeshott does run &#8211; would Port Macquarie revert to being National?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172927</link>
		<dc:creator>micky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 22:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172927</guid>
		<description>Seems every poll shows rudds popularity going lower and lower and nelsons slowly going higher and higher. Its only a matter of time before the libs get over the 51% 2PP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems every poll shows rudds popularity going lower and lower and nelsons slowly going higher and higher. Its only a matter of time before the libs get over the 51% 2PP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gusface</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172875</link>
		<dc:creator>gusface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172875</guid>
		<description>Poss
the oz wouldn&#039;t know mirth if it hit em in the funny bone

(just ask mumble!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poss<br />
the oz wouldn&#8217;t know mirth if it hit em in the funny bone</p>
<p>(just ask mumble!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum Comitatus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172874</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum Comitatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172874</guid>
		<description>Oops, or Oakeshott even.

Greeny, I hope Billbowe is taking the mirth of The Oz dig for what it was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, or Oakeshott even.</p>
<p>Greeny, I hope Billbowe is taking the mirth of The Oz dig for what it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greeensborough Growler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172873</link>
		<dc:creator>Greeensborough Growler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172873</guid>
		<description>G&#039;day JOM,

FWIW i think this blog is pro Labor with a distinct green tinge. I&#039;m sure William would prefer a balance of opinion but I believe the MSM seems to cater more than adequately for the pro Liberal, right wing view.

That said, I enjoy your contributions and hope you and others of your ilk continue to post here. 

I may not agree, but I enjoy the challenge.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>G&#8217;day JOM,</p>
<p>FWIW i think this blog is pro Labor with a distinct green tinge. I&#8217;m sure William would prefer a balance of opinion but I believe the MSM seems to cater more than adequately for the pro Liberal, right wing view.</p>
<p>That said, I enjoy your contributions and hope you and others of your ilk continue to post here. </p>
<p>I may not agree, but I enjoy the challenge.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Possum Comitatus</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172870</link>
		<dc:creator>Possum Comitatus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172870</guid>
		<description>Swordfish,

Stoner would be the Nats best bet - but if Oakshott runs, Stoner would sacrifice being a front bencher and head cow cocky in the next NSW government for a tilt at years in the wilderness at the Federal level where he still wouldn&#039;t be the favourite to win Lyne.

If you were Stoner, would you roll those dice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swordfish,</p>
<p>Stoner would be the Nats best bet &#8211; but if Oakshott runs, Stoner would sacrifice being a front bencher and head cow cocky in the next NSW government for a tilt at years in the wilderness at the Federal level where he still wouldn&#8217;t be the favourite to win Lyne.</p>
<p>If you were Stoner, would you roll those dice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swordfish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172868</link>
		<dc:creator>Swordfish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172868</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the only Nat that can win Lyne is one with a strong local profile: Andrew Stoner.

He&#039;d also be a potential federal leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the only Nat that can win Lyne is one with a strong local profile: Andrew Stoner.</p>
<p>He&#8217;d also be a potential federal leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/07/21/acnielsen-54-46-3/comment-page-2/#comment-172866</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/894#comment-172866</guid>
		<description>JoM

True, William lets all, lib, labor, nat, green, FF, SWP etc have a fair say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JoM</p>
<p>True, William lets all, lib, labor, nat, green, FF, SWP etc have a fair say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
