<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Morgan: 58-42</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:13:29 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187158</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187158</guid>
		<description>I will repost this , but leave it till about 20 posts hav been made</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will repost this , but leave it till about 20 posts hav been made</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187154</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187154</guid>
		<description>MP

make up your mine , one minute &quot;I&#039;m more than abit More than a bit ingenuous in #99 , then 2 hours later in #101 &quot; more than a bit disingenuous&quot; Given your claimed measured posting I can only conclude you believe I&#039;m both

Frankly you hav reduced a complicated Geo politcal Georgian issue that had its more definitive roots at NATO meeting in april which agreeing to admit Georgia &amp; Ukraine subject to doing due process , into a one liner blaming it all on a US presidential candidatte Such a notion would be regarded by any professional non partisan foreign affairs expert as absurb 

In other posts you&#039;ve displayed a strong anti ANZUS &amp; anti US stanse regarding foreign affairs , and its your right to do so despite it representing a miniscule of &#039;oz&#039; views However your latest alegation blaming maverick over Georgia would be more typical of extreme left marxists and is NOT th view of our Rudd government not th EU In fact th German &amp; French pres hav publicly condemned Russia  

What we do know Rrom russia&#039;s invasion is th response of Bush mirrored by Obama was p.ssweak and appeasemement by both What we do know prior to invaion is Russia invaded another UN recognised sovereign Country , both facts you blithley ignore 

What we do know pre invasion is separate 5 parties (Russia, Ossetians , EU , US &amp; Georgia) had varying complicated responsibilitys for what occured &amp; none of whom was McCain or Obama for that matter Clearly most responsibility &amp; condemnation belongs with th invader Russia , with th other 4 partys not blameless either as I&#039;ve previously said but to a varying lesser degree

This Country Russian you seem to think with anti american sentiment to hav same historic values &amp; libertys as th 26 Nations making up th NATO  &amp; therefore worthy in your view to be regarded as a benign peace maker

Tell that to th 14 former Soviet dominated Countrys who gleefuly escaped Russia&#039;s tyranny &amp; genocides like th Polish , th chezs etc , who see EU &amp; Nato as protecting there libertys from thuggish Russia , go to any of those countrys waving a Russian flag and anti US flag &amp; see how much support you get , especialy th surviving families

Iraq ...what you achieve with your illogical alegation is to allow th 100% defenders of US being 100% perfect in all things FA to sterotype ALL &amp; any criticism of USA FA as coming from looney left marxists &amp; to be disregarded , meaning those that ar legatimatekly condemning USA over its disgraceful Iraq invasion to be lumped with you &amp; anti american sentimenjt , and therefore potentialy ignored  You know Obama went to Afhganistan 7 its deteriorated since , &amp; he&#039;s to blame say some blogers , another absurd partissan point scoring US electon spin whch you&#039;ve indulged in 

Fact is AMONGST other Gep politcal factors there ar both gas &amp; oil pipelines going through Georgia &amp; there was to be Georgian NATO &amp; EU membership , all of which ar above th influense of any US candidate , big powers decide these things but by all means post such blogs , you&#039;ll convince no one on that basis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MP</p>
<p>make up your mine , one minute &#8220;I&#8217;m more than abit More than a bit ingenuous in #99 , then 2 hours later in #101 &#8221; more than a bit disingenuous&#8221; Given your claimed measured posting I can only conclude you believe I&#8217;m both</p>
<p>Frankly you hav reduced a complicated Geo politcal Georgian issue that had its more definitive roots at NATO meeting in april which agreeing to admit Georgia &amp; Ukraine subject to doing due process , into a one liner blaming it all on a US presidential candidatte Such a notion would be regarded by any professional non partisan foreign affairs expert as absurb </p>
<p>In other posts you&#8217;ve displayed a strong anti ANZUS &amp; anti US stanse regarding foreign affairs , and its your right to do so despite it representing a miniscule of &#8216;oz&#8217; views However your latest alegation blaming maverick over Georgia would be more typical of extreme left marxists and is NOT th view of our Rudd government not th EU In fact th German &amp; French pres hav publicly condemned Russia  </p>
<p>What we do know Rrom russia&#8217;s invasion is th response of Bush mirrored by Obama was p.ssweak and appeasemement by both What we do know prior to invaion is Russia invaded another UN recognised sovereign Country , both facts you blithley ignore </p>
<p>What we do know pre invasion is separate 5 parties (Russia, Ossetians , EU , US &amp; Georgia) had varying complicated responsibilitys for what occured &amp; none of whom was McCain or Obama for that matter Clearly most responsibility &amp; condemnation belongs with th invader Russia , with th other 4 partys not blameless either as I&#8217;ve previously said but to a varying lesser degree</p>
<p>This Country Russian you seem to think with anti american sentiment to hav same historic values &amp; libertys as th 26 Nations making up th NATO  &amp; therefore worthy in your view to be regarded as a benign peace maker</p>
<p>Tell that to th 14 former Soviet dominated Countrys who gleefuly escaped Russia&#8217;s tyranny &amp; genocides like th Polish , th chezs etc , who see EU &amp; Nato as protecting there libertys from thuggish Russia , go to any of those countrys waving a Russian flag and anti US flag &amp; see how much support you get , especialy th surviving families</p>
<p>Iraq &#8230;what you achieve with your illogical alegation is to allow th 100% defenders of US being 100% perfect in all things FA to sterotype ALL &amp; any criticism of USA FA as coming from looney left marxists &amp; to be disregarded , meaning those that ar legatimatekly condemning USA over its disgraceful Iraq invasion to be lumped with you &amp; anti american sentimenjt , and therefore potentialy ignored  You know Obama went to Afhganistan 7 its deteriorated since , &amp; he&#8217;s to blame say some blogers , another absurd partissan point scoring US electon spin whch you&#8217;ve indulged in </p>
<p>Fact is AMONGST other Gep politcal factors there ar both gas &amp; oil pipelines going through Georgia &amp; there was to be Georgian NATO &amp; EU membership , all of which ar above th influense of any US candidate , big powers decide these things but by all means post such blogs , you&#8217;ll convince no one on that basis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Bowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187152</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187152</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/943&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New thread&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/943" rel="nofollow">New thread</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Socrates</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187150</link>
		<dc:creator>Socrates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187150</guid>
		<description>Different topic: environment.  Here is a link a friend sent me to a fascinating CSIRO report analysing population and environmental data over the last thirty years and comparing it to the Club of Rome&#039;s famous much-derided Limits to Growth report of 1970.
http://www.csiro.au/files/files/plje.pdf

What is interesting is that, despite past criticism from growth-is-good economists, it seems the Club of Rome wasn&#039;t so far wrong!  The actual history has tracked pretty close to the &quot;business as usual&quot; case in their report.  What has proved unrealistic were the &quot;technology will fix it&quot; scenarios.  So much for all those CC denialists who say that global models are never right.  

Soberingly, the Limits to Growth report projected major social collapse mid way through this century.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different topic: environment.  Here is a link a friend sent me to a fascinating CSIRO report analysing population and environmental data over the last thirty years and comparing it to the Club of Rome&#8217;s famous much-derided Limits to Growth report of 1970.<br />
<a href="http://www.csiro.au/files/files/plje.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.csiro.au/files/files/plje.pdf</a></p>
<p>What is interesting is that, despite past criticism from growth-is-good economists, it seems the Club of Rome wasn&#8217;t so far wrong!  The actual history has tracked pretty close to the &#8220;business as usual&#8221; case in their report.  What has proved unrealistic were the &#8220;technology will fix it&#8221; scenarios.  So much for all those CC denialists who say that global models are never right.  </p>
<p>Soberingly, the Limits to Growth report projected major social collapse mid way through this century.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward StJohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187149</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward StJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:00:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187149</guid>
		<description>The Intrade odds are collapsing too Diogenes, 51-47 in Obama&#039;s favour now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Intrade odds are collapsing too Diogenes, 51-47 in Obama&#8217;s favour now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward StJohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187148</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward StJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187148</guid>
		<description>Dyno - BHO&#039;s bounce was +6, McCain&#039;s is looking like +16. Clinton got +17 in 1992. Hence my view he&#039;s finished.

No Diogenes, have you read &quot;What&#039;s left&quot;, by some journo in UK similar theme. Says the left sold out in its failure to challenge Islamic extremism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dyno &#8211; BHO&#8217;s bounce was +6, McCain&#8217;s is looking like +16. Clinton got +17 in 1992. Hence my view he&#8217;s finished.</p>
<p>No Diogenes, have you read &#8220;What&#8217;s left&#8221;, by some journo in UK similar theme. Says the left sold out in its failure to challenge Islamic extremism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diogenes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187135</link>
		<dc:creator>Diogenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187135</guid>
		<description>ESJ

I&#039;m not even going to respond to that.

Have you (or anyone else) read &quot;Murder in Amsterdam&quot; by Buruma. It&#039;s about the murder of Theo van Gogh by a Muslim extremist. It talks about what happens when Enlightenment/ liberal values are challenged by (in this case) Muslim fundamentalism. Liberal values are then caught in a paradox; they should tolerate and try to understand all opinions but this very tolerance can sew the seed of the destruction of a liberal society (either through terrorism, massive immigration of people who don&#039;t share these ideals, or because of the rise of populist reactionary right-wing politicians who strongly oppose Muslim immigration).

It&#039;s quite fascinating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESJ</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not even going to respond to that.</p>
<p>Have you (or anyone else) read &#8220;Murder in Amsterdam&#8221; by Buruma. It&#8217;s about the murder of Theo van Gogh by a Muslim extremist. It talks about what happens when Enlightenment/ liberal values are challenged by (in this case) Muslim fundamentalism. Liberal values are then caught in a paradox; they should tolerate and try to understand all opinions but this very tolerance can sew the seed of the destruction of a liberal society (either through terrorism, massive immigration of people who don&#8217;t share these ideals, or because of the rise of populist reactionary right-wing politicians who strongly oppose Muslim immigration).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite fascinating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187133</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:34:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187133</guid>
		<description>Newspoll 56-44</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newspoll 56-44</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyno</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187128</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187128</guid>
		<description>ESJ,
How much is bounce?
Aren&#039;t we supposed to wait a week or so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ESJ,<br />
How much is bounce?<br />
Aren&#8217;t we supposed to wait a week or so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward StJohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/09/05/morgan-58-42-2/comment-page-3/#comment-187127</link>
		<dc:creator>Edward StJohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/934#comment-187127</guid>
		<description>Latest Gallup 54-44 in McCains favour. In the American vernacular - stick a fork in (Obama) him he&#039;s done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Latest Gallup 54-44 in McCains favour. In the American vernacular &#8211; stick a fork in (Obama) him he&#8217;s done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
