Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Liberal leadership: round two

   

Brendan Nelson has thrown the Liberal leadership open to a party room vote tomorrow morning. A source quoted by the ABC calls the move a “suicide mission” and “predicts Malcolm Turnbull has the numbers to take the leadership”. Nelson defeated Turnbull in the first round five days after the November 24 election by 45 votes to 42.

520 Comments

Pages: « 17 8 9 10 [11] Show All

  1. 501
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    How many people with a poor family get to spend their primary school days at Sydney Grammar prep?

    Talcum is a fraud. :)

  2. 502
    Roxanna
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:07 pm | Permalink

    Adam @ 495

    [What happened to the new Good Manners Pollbludger?] Good question. :sad:

  3. 503
    juliem
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    Ruawake, Julia is speaking tomorrow (prescheduled), topic of “Forward with Fairness”. ACT leaders debate with all 4 present (leaders and deputies) on Thursday. This week will be a good one at the NPC. As I understand it, Sky is carrying the NPC show today by Cossie live; imagine that they will carry Wednesday and Thursday speakers live too ;-)

  4. 504
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

    495 What happened to the new Good Manners Pollbludger?

    There’s some very twitchy and nervous tories around here today. I think they thought this was going to be a decisive vote and almost half of the Liberal Party have rejected Turnbull already.

  5. 505
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:20 pm | Permalink

    How predictable and cowardly by Rudd.
    Rudd needs to focus on his ETS rather than a Republic!

    Glen, just those comments by you show how much of a masterstroke it was.

  6. 506
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:24 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure the Liberals will love fighting for the Republic once the new Leader explains it in terms they can understand. We don’t want this crippling disunity and disloyalty to the leader to drag on longer than necessary now do we?

  7. 507
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:25 pm | Permalink

    In all fairness Adam most of us here are dispalying very good manners IMHO. There are just one or two slow learners but they have improved over time.

  8. 508
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    We may be DISPLAYING (I think I’ve got that right this time) good manners but typing is proving a problem on my part.

  9. 509
    James J
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Peter Costello now at the NPC.

  10. 510
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    What happened to the new Good Manners Pollbludger?

    After a retrospective review, I’ve deleted one comment by Bushfire Bill and two by Generic Person. The next comment of GP’s that gets deleted will be his last at this site.

  11. 511
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    As I have said, we already have an Australian Head of State. The whole republican debate is a waste of time, money and effort.

  12. 512
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Wonder if Labor will start a reform school for monarchists would are finding it difficult to accept the concept of the Republic of Australia that the Liberals effectively voted for this morning.

  13. 513
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    GP your gravitar looks a lot like the symbol of the ‘Republican Party’ to me. Tell me that you aren’t a closet Republican.

  14. 514
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:36 pm | Permalink

    I might be wrong on this but if my memory serves me well, the OO was very pro-Republic during the referendum, as were the media in general. That’s going to make it harder for Turnbull to squirm out from the wedge. Any chance he’ll support it?

  15. 515
    Justin
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull needs to explain his position on the Republic in terms of where it should sit on the country’s list of priorities right at the moment, and ask Rudd why he’s focusing on something which will effectively do nothing to better the position of anyone except the President and the Vice President when the entire world’s going into economic meltdown. Labor already has a monopoly on the symbolism, the Libs need to pull back ground on pragmatic policy.
    512: It’d be a re-education revolution.

  16. 516
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    “It’d be a re-education revolution.”

    Justin, it will have to be if people claiming to be Liberals and monarchists have got the hide to use the symbol of one of the great republican party logos while arguing against a republic.

  17. 517
    Justin
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    They’re part of the same conspiracy as ALP members backing that self-proclaimed liberal, Barack Obama.

  18. 518
    steve
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    I’m not a member of any political Party, Justin, so does that mean I can make up my own mind?

  19. 519
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Shanahan asks a question at Cozzie’s press conference…

    “Why didn’t you issue a challenge to Howard? Hawke challenged Hayden, Keating-Hawke, Howard-Downer, Beazley Crean, Rudd Beazley, Turnbull-Nelson… Do you regret not challenging Howard and thereby giving up forever having the chance to be PM?”

    “Cozzie (after quibbling about who challanged who)… Howard losing his seat was a disappointment.”

    That’s it… evaded the question.

  20. 520
    Posted Tuesday, September 16, 2008 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    New thread.

Pages: « 17 8 9 10 [11] Show All