Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

US election minus 36 days

Either due to the market meltdown, the debate or both, much has changed in Gallup tracking poll land since our last thrilling instalment.

We also have this entertaining survey on Australian attitudes to the presidential race from UMR Research, showing 66 per cent of respondents preferring Barack Obama against 13 per cent for John McCain. Sarah Palin and (especially) George W. Bush also appear to be none too popular in our part of the world.

1,274 Comments

Pages: « 121 22 [23] 24 2526 » Show All

  1. 1101
    Al
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Juliem,

    It’s my prediction that at 8pm PST, California, Washington, Hawaii and Oregon will all be called taking Obama over the top. So my guess is those 4 states simultaneously, but if you want to tie it down to one, I’ll say California.

  2. 1102
    juliem
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:08 pm | Permalink

    Ron, it is Falwell not Faldwell ……. and anyone who associates with him has a few screws loose ……… this is the same man who said that one of the Teletubbies was a gay icon as he had a male voice but carried a handbag in the show … my youngest is 7 but if I stretch my memory banks, I think that TT was TinkyWinky ….

  3. 1103
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    As I’ve said before, I don’t like negative ads from either political party, but I accept that it’s part of the modern political fabric. The Democrats forgot how to do negative ads well after Clinton – thankfully, Obama seems willing to fight it out on the level the GOP understands – good for him!

    As for Obama’s association with Rezko, Wright and Ayers – I accept the GOP have the right to run negative ads about this. It’s a legitimate negative political tactic. That said, if they’re going to negative ads against Obama, they should expect Obama to return fire – and two of the main negatives for McCain are his involvement in the Keating Five and his presumed infidelity with his first wife.

    And as for the smears against McCain’s time in captivity – I disapprove of them wholeheartedly, regardless of who is making them. However, I don’t have any sympathy with the GOP over this – they were the ones who undeservedly tarnished fellow Vietnam War Hero John Kerry’s record in 2004…

  4. 1104
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    yes I’ve got info of Obama & th terorist William Ayres but th Obamabots Possum Diogenes etc also know about it too & ar playing kids games on keyboards in denial or ar lazy Its all on US public FBI records , so your sarcasm is unwarranted

    you’ve got it?? OMG! FBI records??? Out with it then man! C’mon, bring Obama down with your smoking gun. Show me that great evidence.

    Boy the MSM in America really have dropped the ball on this one. Where’s Fox news when you need it??

  5. 1105
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    Obama +5 in NM (Alberquerque Journal Poll):

    http://www.lcsun-news.com/ci_10649251

  6. 1106
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:18 pm | Permalink

    Regardless of who is ahead in the polls in the US it doesnt matter for nothing because they dont have compulsory voting and even those on the roles may not go and vote.

  7. 1107
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    Regardless of who is ahead in the polls in the US it doesnt matter for nothing because they dont have compulsory voting and even those on the roles may not go and vote.

    That’s why they only report the results for likely voters (as opposed to registered voters).

  8. 1108
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:20 pm | Permalink

    1103 SL – I’m with you there. Negative attacks would not be around in a perfect world; but they are, so the Dems should go in as well. (but as someone pointed out earlier they did well to wait for McCain to go that route first).

    I think the Dems will hammer McCain on keating5 stuff – the Vietnam aspect will be left to arms length swift boat type bottom feeders. A pox on both of them.

  9. 1109
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    4/ So Faldwell (sic) connection/association to McCain is reely (sic) lame in comparison

    This is a factual assertion, which can only be valid if it is backed up by evidence and logical reasoning. In other words, WHY is it “lame in comparison”?

    so MCcain’s (sic) judgement (sic) was definitively poor

    Great, that is the point I was making. So McCain is no better or worse than Obama. McCain chose to associate himself with someone who did not believe in democracy, liberty or pluralism, simply so he could get the Republican nomination.

    That suggests to me a person who would do anything to win, even if it means selling out his own values. This is also a great demonstration of why John McCain in 2008 is a sad reflection of John McCain circa 2000. Back then he was one of the most principled conservative politicians in the world.

  10. 1110
    Dario
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Regardless of who is ahead in the polls in the US it doesnt matter for nothing because they dont have compulsory voting and even those on the roles may not go and vote.

    It does matter Glen

  11. 1111
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    That’s right Ron – by day I’m the mild mannered polling nerd, by night I transform into Possum Riefenstahl; fighting the good propaganda fight to convince the innocent that B. Hoooosein Obama is not the really the cartoon caricature of a whacko pastor worshiping, corrupt donation accepting, terrorist sympathizing Antichrist that the forces of goodness and light make him out to be – but just a misunderstood, mild mannered Senator from Illinois that is liked by Scarlett Johansson.

    And next week on the moonbat express – Kevin Rudd; stripper groping drunkard that eats puppies or merely a Heiner conspirator that disrespects Veterans on Sunrise?

    I report – you believe!

    Come on folks, let’s get a grip here.

  12. 1112
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    Actually it doesnt…you still cannot grasp the fact that even though they are likely voters that doesnt mean they will vote.

    Unless you polled people who had voted in the past 2 elections and was going to vote this time its stupid to do polls, because even though they may like a candidate that doesnt mean on tuesday they’ll bother turning up.

  13. 1113
    Dario
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Actually it doesnt…you still cannot grasp the fact that even though they are likely voters that doesnt mean they will vote.

    Actually it does. It isn’t the be all and end all, but it matters Glen. Only someone down in the polls by so far would think otherwise.

  14. 1114
    Dario
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:27 pm | Permalink

    I think the Dems will hammer McCain on keating5 stuff

    Expect his time on the board of the USCWF to be trotted out also

  15. 1115
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    even if mccain is projected ahead in some states like Ohio and Florida doesnt mean he’ll win them also, it all matters on turn out plain and simple.

  16. 1116
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    What you’re saying is that in a country with optional voting, it is useless to do polls (ever!).

    However, polls have often been quite accurate in predicting the outcome of these elections. The RCP average was accurate to within 10 electoral votes last time, with the only incorrect call being in WI (predicted for Bush by 0.9, but ultimately went for Kerry by less than 1%). Its popular vote calculation was also very close. So polling does have a purpose in the US… :-)

  17. 1117
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Actually it doesnt…you still cannot grasp the fact that even though they are likely voters that doesnt mean they will vote.

    This applies equally to both sides.

    Oh, except for the fact there are now 11 million more registered Democrats than Republicans. In 2004 there were 9 million more Democrats. See here:
    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/commentary_by_rhodes_cook/democrats_winning_the_registration_wars

    Unless you polled people who had voted in the past 2 elections and was going to vote this time its stupid to do polls, because even though they may like a candidate that doesnt mean on tuesday they’ll bother turning up.

    Oh dear, I am having flashbacks to last year when you run out of puff attacking Rudd, so you just started attacking polling in general!

  18. 1118
    Dario
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    even if mccain is projected ahead in some states like Ohio and Florida doesnt mean he’ll win them also, it all matters on turn out plain and simple.

    If polls don’t matter Glen, do you think Obama has a chance in Texas? I’ve got a lovely used car to sell too…

  19. 1119
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    even if mccain is projected ahead in some states like Ohio and Florida doesnt mean he’ll win them also, it all matters on turn out plain and simple.

    He isn’t, he is behind in both Ohio and Florida.

  20. 1120
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    Glen – US pollsters (well the good ones anyway) use pretty clever screening mechanisms to pull out who is actually likely to vote, not only voter lists and the like, but everything from questions related to broader general public affairs issues and recent political histor through to local geographical location and socio-economic data.

    It’s pretty good all things considering.

  21. 1121
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:31 pm | Permalink

    even if mccain is projected ahead in some states like Ohio and Florida doesnt mean he’ll win them also

    Geez, Glen. Of course polls are no guarrantee. If they were why bother with all those damn election thingys.

    I’d still rather be 7 points up than behind.

  22. 1122
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn #1109, using (sic) like that is gravely irritating at the best of times – doubly so when you don’t even get it right (”judgement”).

  23. 1123
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:34 pm | Permalink

    Well it would have to be especially in the USA, not like here though it still amazes me some of the polls we get from Morgan which is way out of kilter. The problem is that in the next few weeks we’ll be bombarded with State polls and it will be difficult to distinguish between the credible and not so. The poll that said McCain was behind in NM said 16 of democrats said they were still yet to make a firm decision on their vote.

    Look I am merely pointing out the difficulties in polling in a nation where they have the freedom not to vote.

  24. 1124
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    Well it would have to be especially in the USA, not like here though it still amazes me some of the polls we get from Morgan which is way out of kilter.

    What about the one JUST before the election last year?

    The problem is that in the next few weeks we’ll be bombarded with State polls and it will be difficult to distinguish between the credible and not so.

    So you use modeling to add them together to try and reduce the margin of error. If you get a whole bunch of polls that say roughly the same thing, then you can feel more confident the result is roughly accurate. Or perhaps they are ALL inaccurate, but that seems to be unlikely if they are by different companies using different methodologies.

    The poll that said McCain was behind in NM said 16 of democrats said they were still yet to make a firm decision on their vote.

    So that’s only slightly higher than the national polls.

    Look I am merely pointing out the difficulties in polling in a nation where they have the freedom not to vote.

    OK, well that’s a bit banal, not as impressive as your initial statement that implied we can’t trust polls whatsoever.

  25. 1125
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:39 pm | Permalink

    Everyone knows about fivethirtyeight.com to help with the polls, but there’s also a more complicated snazzy site at Princeton that is worth following as well:

    http://election.princeton.edu/

  26. 1126
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:49 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the link Possum – you may be mild mannered, but we all know you’re a polling superhero! :=)

  27. 1127
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    woops was meant to be :D (so that’d be :=) (sic))!

  28. 1128
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    If anybody can get me to trust polling its you Possum, how could i not trust Princeton!

  29. 1129
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Finally Possum has admitted what Il have suspected for almost twelve months. He is in the tank for Obama, as is his little mate Nate at 538 and Andy at electoral-vote. And as for “Scott” at electionprojection, what a Benedict Arnold he turned out to be. How can a fundamentalist Christian be reporting Obama ahead 364-174?

    In the real world, the Republicans are winning and nothing anyone can say will make me believe any different.

    And to think I sent a nice email to Andy and Nate about Possum when they were in cahoots all along!

  30. 1130
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    heh! – there’s something about the words “Princeton” and “polling analysis” that just look damn good in the same sentence – and Sam Wang doesnt dissapoint! At the:

    http://election.princeton.edu/for-fellow-geeks/

    Everything is available for anyone to reproduce what he’s doing. His EV scores are walking so close to hand in hand with the median values of my Intrade sims it’s not funny. Weird how everyone’s numbers all play out sometimes.

  31. 1131
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:02 pm | Permalink

    How can a fundamentalist Christian be reporting Obama ahead 364-174?

    :D Karl Rove thinks Obama has 273 in the bag:
    http://www.rove.com/election

  32. 1132
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    Dio -dont take it too hard, when you’re going to take over ze world, nobody is sacred! :-D

  33. 1133
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    Would the ABC or SBS run the election coverage if we dont have foxtel on election day?

  34. 1134
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Electionprojection has Obama ahead in MO!. He also has Obama up in NV, FL, NC, VA, OH and CO by a small margin. He’s given up on the other states. So all McCain needs to do is flip those seven states and he wins. Easy, hey!

    It does make you wonder what the hell McCain was doing in Iowa though. McCain needs to pull out of PA. It’s gone. He’s been down in about 30 polls in a row and he’s down by 9.2% on RCP.

  35. 1135
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    I can remember it being on free to air in 2004, im not sure whether it will be the case this november….

  36. 1136
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Ohio and Florida dont need much work, they’ve voted Republican in the last 2 elections and NC should be able to be brought back to the fold. Likewise with VA. NV NM and Colorado will be the hard ones.

  37. 1137
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Dio – I wonder if McCain’s been running on the pre-Obama demographic map? It’s the only way to explain why they pissed Michigan up the wall, didnt take Colorado seriously until it was too late, New Mexico is gone – now PA as well, Iowa to boot. These are big Party blueprint decisions which makes you wonder if it’s not the information itself from the Republican party that’s the problem?

  38. 1138
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Would the ABC or SBS run the election coverage if we dont have foxtel on election day?

    I doubt it. But NBC, CNN, CBS, FOX will probably all be running live streams.

    I watched the 2004 election that way, and they were pretty reliable.

    It does make you wonder what the hell McCain was doing in Iowa though.

    Demonstrating how poorly run his campaign is. What about Michigan! He goes there essentially to announce that he and Palin won’t be going back there.

    Ohio and Florida dont need much work, they’ve voted Republican in the last 2 elections and NC should be able to be brought back to the fold.

    Florida has the 2nd highest rate of home foreclosures in the country (Nevada is first). So I think he is in trouble there. If he can’t win in Ohio then he can’t win at all IMO.

    Likewise with VA.

    Can you believe that McCain has to try and defend Virgina and North Carolina at this stage? I mean New Mexico has flipped back and forth so that was always going to be a battleground, but Colorado?

  39. 1139
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Glen – SBS will cover it on free to air. ABC will probably have some sort of coverage.

    Anyone know if they’ll dedicate ABC2 to the US Election?

  40. 1140
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    NM is gone. McCain gave up there a while ago. Iowa and New Mexico are definite losses. McCain can’t lose any of those seven above. I agree that CO and NV are his biggest worry. Lets face it, if he loses NC or VA he’s been annihilated

    There still seem to be a few issues financially.

    European and Asian markets plunge as bailouts in US, Europe fail to ease financial fears
    http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081006/as_world_markets.html?.v=7

  41. 1141
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    New Mexico is gone - now PA as well, Iowa to boot.

    I read an article saying McCain is taking resources out of Michigan to direct them at Pennsylvania and Minnesota.

    Ironically, today Minnesota flipped from toss up to lean Democrat on Pollster.com. Pennsylvania did the same early last week. :D

    These are big Party blueprint decisions which makes you wonder if it’s not the information itself from the Republican party that’s the problem?

    It gets worse, fivethirtyeight says Obama is in with a chance in Indiana!
    http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/10/on-road-tippecanoe-county-indiana.html

  42. 1142
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:30 pm | Permalink

    Anyone know if they’ll dedicate ABC2 to the US Election?

    Let’s make angry phone calls demanding it.

    The only question is, which network? NBC or CNN would be best I think.

    CBS if they dust off Dan Rather to make all those bizarre similes.

  43. 1143
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    CBS if they dust off Dan Rather to make all those bizarre similes.

    http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/blratherisms.htm

  44. 1144
    The Finnigans
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:33 pm | Permalink

    Amigo GG & Ronnie, it looks like i have missed out on a good battle Vs the new mob of Obamabots. Still the same old one hand clapping, nothing has changed. we even have a new Czarina who is sounding more and more like the old one.

  45. 1145
    Glen
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure i watched the coverage free to air in 2004, it must have been ABC or SBS but considering they’ve televised all the debates and the VP debate there is a good chance they’ve gotten the message that people are interested and do want to watch it so we may be lucky come the morning of November 5.

  46. 1146
    Swing Lowe
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    Amigo GG & Ronnie, it looks like i have missed out on a good battle Vs the new mob of Obamabots.

    Unfortunately for you, we’re all veterans of Election 07, so we’re not going to leave until election day (although I will, because I will be in the US later this month… :-) )

  47. 1147
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Possum

    Perhaps they bought all the Hillary=McCain vs Obama stuff. McCain knew he was never going to win Iowa (he opposes the alcohol fuel subsidy), but the caning he’s getting in PA and MI must be sobering.

    I think part of his problem is his lack of reach. No-one wants to see him without Palin. He can’t let Palin out of his sight. So he’s essentially halving his reach. Who else can he get to stump for him? Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld etc are all electoral poison. Romney’s heart’s not in it, and Huckabee’s isn’t either. He’s got Rudy and Lieberman.

  48. 1148
    injuddstree
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Evening all – long (long, long, long) time reader of TPB, decided to join up and occasionally add my few cents. Just a quickie – can someone link me to any data on the polling a month prior to the 2004 election? I’ve got a bet to settle with a mate ;-)

  49. 1149
    Andrew
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    7 Palin staff to testify in Troopergate probe
    http://edition.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/10/05/palin.probe/index.html

  50. 1150
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, October 6, 2008 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Evening all - long (long, long, long) time reader of TPB, decided to join up and occasionally add my few cents. Just a quickie - can someone link me to any data on the polling a month prior to the 2004 election? I’ve got a bet to settle with a mate ;-)

    Hi, welcome!
    I hope this helps:
    http://www.gallup.com/poll/110548/Gallup-Presidential-Election-TrialHeat-Trends-19362004.aspx

Pages: « 121 22 [23] 24 2526 » Show All