Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Presidential election minus five days

With less than a week ago to the big day, the polls are showing only a fractional narrowing in Barack Obama’s formidable lead. Such narrowing has been enough to move North Carolina to the John McCain column on my polling aggregates while making Indiana line-ball, but Obama is retaining his tight grip on the rust-belt swing states while increasing his lead in Florida. For some local colour, our good friends at UMR Research have produced another poll on Australian views of the contest. It finds Obama’s lead over McCain among Australians has widened still further in the past month, from 66-13 to 72-9.

Obama McCain Sample D-EV R-EV
Michigan 54.7 39.4 3005 17
Washington 54.9 40.1 3379 11
Maine 54.5 40.0 2185 4
Minnesota 53.6 41.3 4128 10
Iowa 52.6 41.7 3530 7
Pennsylvania 52.2 41.7 5505 21
New Hampshire 51.7 41.9 3905 4
Wisconsin 51.5 42.1 3490 10
New Mexico 50.5 43.3 2927 5
Colorado 50.6 44.4 4541 9
Ohio 48.6 42.8 4741 20
Virginia 50.7 45.0 4852 13
Nevada 50.0 45.4 3418 5
Florida 48.0 45.2 5429 27
Missouri 47.4 46.5 4050 11
North Dakota 45.5 44.7 1206 3
Indiana 47.1 47.0 4934 11
North Carolina 47.4 48.4 5466 15
Montana 45.0 48.9 3128 3
Georgia 45.6 50.0 3530 15
West Virginia 42.7 51.0 3622 5
Others - - - 175 137
RCP/Total 49.9 43.9 - 363 175

478 Comments

Pages: « 14 5 [6] 7 810 » Show All

  1. 251
    Socrates
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    Just to clarify the above, I meant that the reregulation being suggested now is nowhere near socialism. It would be still to the right of the conservative governments of the 60s and 70s.

  2. 252
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    Our friends at Zogby have reversed their one day trend to McCain. Today’s figures are 52/42 making it 49.5/43.8.

  3. 253
    ShowsOn
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:33 pm | Permalink

    Our friends at Zogby have reversed their one day trend to McCain. Today’s figures are 52/42 making it 49.5/43.8.

    Did you get this from Drudge!? :D

    Didn’t think so…

  4. 254
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn

    Drudge is very downbeat at the moment. He couldn’t find any outlier polls so he reported the facts. It’s almost unheard of ;)

    GALLUP: HISTORIC BLOWOUT FOR OBAMA...
    ZOGBY: OBAMA +5.7%...
    RASMUSSEN: OBAMA HOLDS AT 51%...
    TIPP: 9% STILL NOT SURE...

  5. 255
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    The Repugs are so pathetic. Talk about clasping at straws.

    The Republicans have made a last-minute attempt to prevent Barack Obama’s ascent to the White House by trying to recruit an Oxford academic to “prove” that his autobiography was ghostwritten by a former terrorist.

    Dr Peter Millican, a philosophy don at Hertford College, Oxford, has devised a computer software program that can detect when works are by the same author by comparing favourite words and phrases.

    Republicans try to use Oxford don to smear Barack Obama
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article5063279.ece

  6. 256
    ShowsOn
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:52 pm | Permalink

    TIPP: 9% STILL NOT SURE...

    Does this mean Costello is still unsure? :D

    Drudge is very downbeat at the moment. He couldn’t find any outlier polls so he reported the facts. It’s almost unheard of ;)

    THIS is the image that made feel comfortable:
    http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/426/trackers_1101_bothgallup.gif

    Since the 27th, McCain hasn’t gone over 44.5%. The aggregate of the trackers is basically just a flat line for him that can’t even reach 45%.

  7. 257
    Dario
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    The ever reliably unreliable Zogby at its best

  8. 258
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    One thing I found interesting on the Zogby breakdowns is that McCain is only leading Obama by 6% in armed forces households. I suppose they are younger and “blacker” than the general population, but for a “Navy hero” he’s not doing well with the military. And there’s plenty of military households in VA, NC and SC.

  9. 259
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 8:44 pm | Permalink

    TIPP: 9% STILL NOT SURE...

    Does this mean Costello is still unsure?

    line of the night ShowsOn. :lol:

  10. 260
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Drudge is very downbeat at the moment. He couldn’t find any outlier polls so he reported the facts.

    Yes but he made sure it was very small. The headline is a pic of BO looking every bit the evil warlord pointing with a caption “I will change the world”.

    Very weird.

  11. 261
    ShowsOn
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Yes but he made sure it was very small. The headline is a pic of BO looking every bit the evil warlord pointing with a caption “I will change the world”.

    When Reagan spoke like that he was commended.

    What exactly has happened to the Right in the U.S.?

  12. 262
    ltep
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 8:55 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes, Julie Bishop will be scared if that computer program sees the light of day!

  13. 263
    Expat Follower
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    Right, Juliem – after too much dithering, I have to make a stand… I’m with the respected & venerated Julian (#192) on 353 and no to Missouri. Happy to pick a distinguishing state to put Obi over the top, but am not sure how many other 353’s there are – let alone what state they have picked. Will do so by the deadline!

    Ron #174 – there’s no doubt your views are thought out, whether or not people agree with you… I still don’t get the degree of enthusiasm differential on your side between Obi and Hilary – on balance, I suspect Hilary of being more populist and less principled than Obi in general (though there are exceptions like healthcare where she would be more to his left). At worst, close enough to not be sooo harsh on Obi? At any rate, I know we can join together on Tuesday at least to celebrate the end of the latest horrendous Republican era, which was truly necessary!

    The Sarkosy prac joke on Palin just killed me, though how many others would have fallen for the prank similarly… quite a few, methinks – the only exception was not even hesitating with the faux Canadian PM’s name (for gawd’s sake, she oughta know that?!).

    Found it interesting that Glen mentioned Lamar Alexander for ‘96 – he or Powell might have given Bill a run for his money rather than the cadaverous sell-out Dole (too many parallels between him and JohnnyMac this time around)…. unless someone comes out of nowhere, the only viable (if not probable) candidate is Romney mark #1 without the social flip-flops… if he can’t win due to his mormonism then that same base who denies him for that reason will end up promoting Huckabee or Palin. The fiscal conservatives need to reassert themselves somehow on the Repub party… though I spose anything is possible if Obi turns out more Carter like or the Dem legislature are allowed to overreach too extremely. That’s Obi’s biggest test, I reckon – but no matter what if they take Palin in 2012 would at worst be analogous to the last NSW state election?

  14. 264
    Ron
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 9:36 pm | Permalink

    Reagan did change th world for both th better His ’star wars ‘ plans , expanded military spending etc sent USSSR broke trying to compete and helped brake that totalitarian wicked dictatroial USSR Empire He then normalissed relations with Gorbywith a chanse of more freedom for russian peoples & sattellites (very worthwhile) but unfoertunately Putin is reversing freedoms now

    Unforyunately Reagan also sent US debt up with crazy supply side economics , cut into social programs for less well off , caused crashs of part Banking sector with weakwened prudentials , then market meltdown , commenced th illegal Iran contra bit …but George Bush makes Reagan look not so bad comparatively

  15. 265
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Expat @ 261,

    This is what you are up against, between the two of you, one or the other needs to make a stand otherwise, if your number comes up snake eyes, you share the glory …

    Stewart J O 353 N MO
    ExPat Follower O 353 N MO

  16. 266
    Expat Follower
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    This ’state’ that puts Obi over the top is doing my head in!

    I’m going to assume that all the Kerry states plus Iowa & New Mexico will be called for Obama based on exit polling as soon as polls close (that’s only 264). The last tranche of these will be the West Coast states (77) at 11pm Eastern Time. So, if nothing else is called by 11pm then it will be CA/WA/OR/HI that will seal it for Obi.

    Can 83 non-Kerry EC states be called before 11pm? let’s see:
    a) Georgia (15), Indiana (15) and Virginia (13) close at 7pm; Vermont (3) will be called for Obi based on exits
    b) North Carolina (15) and Ohio (20) close at 7:30pm; nothing to add based on exits
    c) Florida (27) and Missouri (15) at 8pm; Obi now up to 105 based on cumulative exits (inc PA – controversial?), assuming non of the Bush states above have been called
    d) Colorado (9) at 9pm; Obi now up to 182 (inc NM – controversial?) – ditto same assumption
    e) Iowa (7), Montana (3) and Nevada (5) at 10pm – they’ll give Iowa to Obi straight away (189) – ditto same assumption

    The question becomes, which will Obama win and when can they be called? My best guesses below:
    - Virginia will be called for Obi fairly quickly – we then “know” he’s won along with PA being called for him, but it won’t be official yet! But if we aren’t comfortable by 8pm eastern, then I’ll be losing my hair quickly!!!
    - Ohio & FL will be called before 11 – bullish call on my part
    - He needs another 20-ish called for him before 11….GO, IN, NC, MO, CO could all get him there in some combination (but I don’t think he’s gonna win GO, IN, MO). Can it be clear that CO is his before 11pm (possible), or that NC is his before 11pm (possible)

    So, I reckon its gotta be between Colorado, Nth Carolina or the West Coast States (this would be simultaneous, so can’t pick one? Julie? Maybe Hawaii for sentimental reasons!).

    My fellow 353’s, what do you say? If I can get in first, I guess I have to go with the West Coast swing, unless its taken – in which case Nth Carolina (not too many picks there, would guess!)

    If y’all reckon I’m smoking pot somewhere in the above, pls tell me before Tuesday!!!

    Without throwing in spanners, maybe the # republican seats in the senate might be a good tiebreaker as well?

  17. 267
    Expat Follower
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Julie, I’m sure Julian has joined us elite prognosticators on 353?

  18. 268
    Ron
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    Expat Follower

    # 263 or #264 “Ron there’s no doubt your views are thought out, whether or not
    people agree with you…”

    #90 “Ron -I for one am convinced that you have criticisms of Obama from the “left”

    Yes Expat Follower my #171 (or #174) did list 19 specific ‘left’ policys areas where I feel Obama is ‘left’ deficient with th first 3 (universal healthcare , Kyoto & centrist economics three of th most important of th 19)

    MOST of those 19 Al Gore (my first preference) would also be in disagreement with Obama as I… Further most of those 19 both Hillary & Edwards (my 2nd & 3rd choises) variously would also disagree with Obama So you ar quite correct my criticisms of Obama ar from th “left” and “left” based , hence I’m informal

    However obviuosly Obama supporters support Obama for different reasons (many probably not aware of th whole 19 list) but most believing supporting a Democrat itself is more than enough reason to avoid a further Republican Presidency with its numerous downsides And believing (correctly) with a Democrat President FA relations will be more inclusive especiallywith th EU and more humane domestic social policys generaly resulting I hav no problem and understand these broad reasons for there support of Obama over a Republican including yours I just happen to want more for my vote , those policys

    My disagreements hav essentially been with either those Obam supporters who claimed (when I individualy posted singularly any of th 19) that they were inaccurate policy criticisms when they were not …..or those posters upset when I introduced character issues of Obama or those posters upset that Obama was criticised at all on any ‘left’ policy as if this was a criticism free Site

    I believe my 19 list warrants my stanse from (for me) a ‘left’ policy viewpoint , however Obama will be elected and I hope he is an outstanding President despite my reservations because both th US and th world economy & world FA needs one after th disgraqce of Bush (And as an aside left person if I thought my non vote could elect a Republican then of course I’d change from informal & vote for Obama)
    .
    I’m in a few moderations for some reason trying today replying to you so not sure of correct post numbers on your screen

  19. 269
    injuddstree
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    LOL @ Fox reading viewer emails.

  20. 270
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Ronster

    I note Hillary is 20% for SoS on Intrade. As if! :D

  21. 271
    Ron
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes

    I thought you would hav been going through my 19 ‘left’ Obama deficiency areas in my #171 (or #174) with your scrupolous scalpels trying to find th slighest error I’d made in that 19 oint long post ….. but no instead you ar energised still about your Lady (Hillary) which surely is not as important as reel policys

    Suspect she will remain in th Senate

  22. 272
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    expat, jj has 313 No Missouri and California. I’ve 375, Yes Missouri and Colorado. You can certainly say the west coast swing if you want, I’ve already got one of those [ CA/OR/WA/HI ] ….. unless I hear otherwise from you, I will assume from your post at 266 that is what you want …. and yes, I am up late tonight ;-) ……

  23. 273
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:23 pm | Permalink

    expat, having everyone guess a 3rd item this late in the piece wouldn’t work as we couldn’t reach that many people in time to submit guesses … some of the players aren’t regular posters and just transit in and out …..

  24. 274
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    most common guess for state to put Obama over the top was Colorado, picked by 9 out of our 30 players so far …….

  25. 275
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Ronster

    I never saw them. Were you in moderation AGAIN, you bad man.

    Looks like I either agree with you on most (1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19) or don’t know/care enough/equivocal about the rest. I don’t actively support his decision on any of them.

    Are you happy now? BTW You’ll have to vote for Nader if you want someone who agrees with you on all of them. It’s quite funny that Obi is getting slammed as a pinko commie in the US when most of his policies would make John Howard blush.

  26. 276
    SimonH
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Okay, I’ll bite for Julie @ 63’s challenge.

    1. 311 EC votes (being conservative/pessimistic. I think NC will be ball-tearingly close with O maybe a tick over 50% to take it. I’ve been saying all year that Obama can’t win Florida and so I shouldn’t back out on my convictions now, even though the number-crunchers would doubt me.)
    2. No. At an imprecise guess, lose by 1-2%.
    3. As Expat Follower has identified, we need some clarification of the definition of the state that puts him over the top. Do you mean the tipping point state as defined in 538.com? Or do you mean the state that is called for him on the night (by which news service/body?) that takes him over 270 EC votes, on top of the states previously called for him on the night? If the former, Virginia; if the latter, doubtless depends on how bullish the news service you’re relying on is, but I’d have to go with weight of numbers and say California.

  27. 277
    dyno
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Expat @ 266,
    By much the same reasoning I picked California as the state to put O over the top. They’ll call it on exit polls whereas Colorado will at least require a real count, which ought to take more than an hour longer.
    Still I am a mere 352er, not a 353er like you.

  28. 278
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 11:33 pm | Permalink

    It’s still plain sailing in Sundays polls so far.

    Zogby National Obama +6%
    Mason-Dixon VA Obama +3% (MD is always 2-3% Repug biased)
    Des Moines Register IA Obama +17%
    Mason-Dixon NV Obama +4%

  29. 279
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 12:03 am | Permalink

    No MOE shifts anywhere

    Colorado Denver Post/Mason-Dixon Obama +5
    Ohio Columbus Dispatch Obama +6
    Pennsylvania Morning Call Obama +7

    And Franken is ahead of Coleman by 4%. :)

  30. 280
    dyno
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 12:12 am | Permalink

    SimonH,

    I believe juliem’s definition of the “state that puts O over the top” is based on the order in which states are “called” by CNN.

    I personally think California is a no-brainer for this.

    (Then again I also thought Hillary was a no-brainer for the nomination, etc, etc).

  31. 281
    Dario
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 12:40 am | Permalink

    It all depends on how big the margin is by the time it gets to the West Coast. CNN may end up ‘calling it’ before Calfornia even closes. You never know.

  32. 282
    SimonH
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    And I should also add one other thing arising from the end of Expat Follower’s 266: any service that calls a state for a candidate, before a single vote has been counted, should be roundly ignored. If there’s evidence that exit polls are significantly more reliable than before-the-fact polls, I’ve not seen it.

    I appreciate that where the swing/numbers are very clear cut, you can validly call a state after just a few thousand votes; but if you’re calling a state on opinion polls, you might as well just call it now.

  33. 283
    Big Blind Dave
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    Simon 282

    “but if you’re calling a state on opinion polls, you might as well just call it now.”

    ok, if you dare me I’ll call California now.

    Obama

    Dare me to take a stab at Utah?

  34. 284
    Big Blind Dave
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:22 am | Permalink

    Just looking through the RCP battle grounds

    It hasn’t always been the case, but currently every “toss up” listed has less than 50% for the current leader and a spread within MOE. The leaning states are all 50% or better with a safe spread.

    With a day left, I’d say that means either candidate could still grab any or all of the toss ups but the others are tied down.

    Obama’s range is between 311 and 406 and McCain is 132 to 227.

  35. 285
    Expat Follower
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    Dyno – what combo of states gets you to 352… the only way I can get it is to give Obi neither of NC or Georgia, one of either Missouri/Indiana and one of either Nth Dakota/Montana…. mate, if you pull that off then you really deserve some serious bragging rights!!

    Simon, to follow on from BigBlindDave, we’ve gotta go with CNN as the universal point of reference (for better or for worse)… I’m sure they called a few of the primaries within 5 seconds of polls closing and would therefore be expecting them to call Vermont for Obi and Kentucky for cadaverboy at 7:00:05. If even an iota of doubt, they tend not to want to make fools of themselves by projecting too early. But, am expecting them to call the West Coast swing at 5 seconds past 11… if they don’t, then my logic goes out the window!!

    Julie, pls check what I have as post 192 from JJulian in this thread… looks like he’s changed to 353? Absolutely fair enough on introducing any new measures at this stage. Curious where the consensus is on #repub senators just out of curiosity (easier to think this way then have to factor in the likes of Lieberman/Sanders)… I’m thinking 41/42 but would be very happy with 37/38!!! As long as that godly Elizabeth Dole loses. I’m with Glen on hoping a couple of the more moderate repub senators survive – need someone to run in 2012 that isn’t a redneck whackjob!!!

  36. 286
    Expat Follower
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:32 am | Permalink

    We need something to obsess over after this election… I think Wolfiebaby is a total lightweight, though enjoy some of his Situation Room commentators (Tobin and Castellanos, ironically enough); I HATE what Brokaw has done with Meet the Press post-Russert (not to mention his crapola moderation of debate #2)… any predictions on who should get the MtP gig permanently… Chuck Todd? I suspect not Matthews or Olbermann!!! Really dig Mike Murphy and Ron Brownstein on MtP when they are on.

  37. 287
    Expat Follower
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:51 am | Permalink

    Everyone is asleep in Aus, no doubt – so will stop (the Grand Prix finale about to start as well). Just wanted to suggest that he who gets the comment number that corresponds to Obi’s final count should get a special booby prize… my post at #286 above covers the Kerry + Iowa + New Mexico + Virginia + Colorado result!!

    Yours sincerely in pathetic sadness…

  38. 288
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 5:46 am | Permalink

    SimonH @ 276,

    Sorry should have clarified for your and some others benefit. In earlier posts over recent weeks, I have but not in the last 10 days or so.

    I meant state that puts him over the top based upon the tv coverage, specifically CNN as that is the channel I will be watching on Wednesday. Some others might watch Fox or a different channel, but I’ll be glued to CNN. I know different places might have a different order to call the states in too so while others out there know I’ve said CNN before, for you since you had not heard that, you’ll have to take my word for it.

    Btw, I read all the way through your post and wrote down California for that question :) …..

  39. 289
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 5:54 am | Permalink

    Re 282,

    SimonH
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:00 am | Permalink

    And I should also add one other thing arising from the end of Expat Follower’s 266: any service that calls a state for a candidate, before a single vote has been counted, should be roundly ignored. If there’s evidence that exit polls are significantly more reliable than before-the-fact polls, I’ve not seen it.

    I appreciate that where the swing/numbers are very clear cut, you can validly call a state after just a few thousand votes; but if you’re calling a state on opinion polls, you might as well just call it now.

    Simon, don’t know how much you’ve been paying attention to either PB posts over the last 2 months or so or reading the various news websites. In no particular order: an Irish betting agency (local equivelent I suppose of the TAB) declared the election in late September/early October refusing to take any more bets and paying out on those it already had on the books; a magazine/newspaper that prints a biweekly issue which straddles their printing cycle has already declared Obama the winner (a la Truman/Dewey overtones if they are wrong) and finally, the US comic strip Doonesbury has already printed and put out to publishers their election day after strip which discusses an Obama victory.

  40. 290
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 5:56 am | Permalink

    Big Blind Dave
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 1:11 am | Permalink

    Simon 282

    “but if you’re calling a state on opinion polls, you might as well just call it now.”

    ok, if you dare me I’ll call California now.

    Obama

    Dare me to take a stab at Utah?

    I’ll declare New York for Obama right here and now ;-) …… Ok, we’ve got California and New York off of the hook :-D

  41. 291
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:00 am | Permalink

    Expat follower @ 285,

    This is the post you refer to

    jjulian1009
    Posted Sunday, November 2, 2008 at 10:01 am | Permalink
    Sorry, forgot to include electoral-vote.com’s E.V. guesstimate:
    Obama 353 McCain 185.

    This was your post above

    Julie, pls check what I have as post 192 from JJulian in this thread… looks like he’s changed to 353?

    jj can correct me if he’s changed his guess but I quite clearly read that as electoral vote.com’s EV guess ….

  42. 292
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:06 am | Permalink

    NBC news in the US is hanging out for numbers of 286 for Obama :) ….. massively underguessing the momentum imho :-D

    Chuck Todd: If McCain Wins All Toss-Ups He Still Loses

    With two days before Election Day, the final NBC News map shows Obama remaining above the 270 electoral-vote mark, with a 286-157 lead over McCain.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/02/chuck-todd-if-mccain-wins_n_140141.html

  43. 293
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:09 am | Permalink

    Tuscon’s newspaper endorses Obama. Tucson is the second largest city in Arizona, following only Phoenix ….. not sure if the Phoenix paper has made an endorsement yet, does anyone know?

    http://www.azstarnet.com/opinion/265275

  44. 294
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:12 am | Permalink

    Stevens will go one way or the other :-D

    In a bluntly worded release from his office, Reid warned that Stevens would not only face an ethics investigation but also expulsion proceedings regardless of his efforts to appeal the convictions.

    Reid’s decision to jump into the Alaska Senate race with both feet marks the first time a leading national Democrat has explicitly warned that Stevens’ ouster from the Senate would be sought. GOP leaders including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) have already called for him to step down or face expulsion.

    http://www.rollcall.com/news/29690-1.html

  45. 295
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:16 am | Permalink

    I*iot …… M*ron …… L*ser ….. woah, wait, I like that last one :-D

    Palin suggests U.S. is at war with Iran.

    In her interview with Fox News’ Greta van Susteren last night, Gov. Sarah Palin appeared to claim that the U.S. needs to “win” the non-existent war with Iran:

    We realize that more and more Americans are starting to see the light there and understand the contrast. And we talk a lot about, OK, we’re confident that we’re going to win on Tuesday, so from there, the first 100 days, how are we going to kick in the plan that will get this economy back on the right track and really shore up the strategies that we need over in Iraq and Iran to win these wars?

    Watch it:

    http://thinkprogress.org/2008/11/01/palin-iran-war/

  46. 296
    juliem
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 6:21 am | Permalink

    McCain in new trouble it seems. The allegations, if true, are new and weren’t turned up at the time of the original Keating5 story.

    The New Republic published an explosive story Saturday evening

    http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=a98690e8-d6b0-44fa-a3f0-c76414c3c9da

    detailing how John McCain, in all likelihood, leaked information to investigators of the Keating Five scandal that was designed to help his image at the expense of the other four Senators involved.

    If the allegation is true -- and TNR makes a healthy case as to its veracity -- it would mean that McCain violated Senate rules and could have been expelled from that body.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/02/mccain-did-not-disclose-k_n_140069.html

  47. 297
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 8:49 am | Permalink

    Something to keep in mind when the exit polls start coming out on Wednesday morning:

    One complication caused by early voting is that the exit polls Tuesday will sample only 60-70% of the electorate and it may well be a biased sample given the fact that so many Democrats have voted early so Tuesday voters may be disproportionately Republicans.

  48. 298
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    As always, Jason Linkins hilarious summary of the Sunday talk shows:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/02/tv-soundoff-sunday-talkin_n_140103.html

  49. 299
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 9:46 am | Permalink

    You’ve got to hand it to the Old Man. He’s really working hard. On Monday, he’ll appear in SIX states, and Palin will be in FIVE.

    On Monday, McCain will spend much of the day in the air while traveling to six states - starting the day in Tampa, FL, he then heads to Blountville, TN and Moon Township, PA, Indianapolis, IN, Roswell, NM, Henderson, NV and ending the night with a midnight rally in Prescott, AZ.
    Palin continues in Ohio, starting in Lakewood before moving on to Jefferson City, MO and Dubuque, IA and Colorado Springs, CO before finishing in Reno and Elko, NV.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/02/where-they-are-today-and_n_140202.html

  50. 300
    Glen
    Posted Monday, November 3, 2008 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    juliem but then you would have to call Texas, Alabama, Louisiana, Mississippi, Utah, Wyoming and Nebraska and Idaho for McCain already…that’s just stupid while we can take educated guesses but dont let hubris take hold.

Pages: « 14 5 [6] 7 810 » Show All