<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACNielsen and Galaxy: 55-45</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:41:16 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: William Bowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218209</link>
		<dc:creator>William Bowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 15:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218209</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/22/newspoll-minus-three-days/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;New thread&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/22/newspoll-minus-three-days/" rel="nofollow">New thread</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Bruce</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218205</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Bruce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218205</guid>
		<description>What a load of rot this is. The Courier Mail have &quot;conducted their own poll&quot; on issues in four marginal seats. They spoke to, wait for it, scores of people in each seat. How scientific.
www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24686588-952,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a load of rot this is. The Courier Mail have &#8220;conducted their own poll&#8221; on issues in four marginal seats. They spoke to, wait for it, scores of people in each seat. How scientific.<br />
<a href="http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24686588-952,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24686588-952,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Paine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218203</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Paine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218203</guid>
		<description>Why is Kroger on? He is a nobody, nobody at all. Why on earth is what has to say of any importance or value? And since when was the Rudd govt ever in any trouble poll wise since the election? These people believe their own dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is Kroger on? He is a nobody, nobody at all. Why on earth is what has to say of any importance or value? And since when was the Rudd govt ever in any trouble poll wise since the election? These people believe their own dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218202</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218202</guid>
		<description>ShowsOn  &quot;I can see exactly why he and Costello formed a faction; Costello was too gutless to become P.M., Kroger was too gutless to become an M.P.&quot;

Well tink you ar also unfair tonite there ...on Michael Kroger

These Uni mates and &#039;Nichols&#039; supporters followed diferent paths Costell for &quot;glory&quot; and Kroger for money 

Now Costello thought he had attained &#039;glory&#039; as 12 years revered Treasurer but now finds there is no glory in being deemed too naive initialy in &#039;beleiving&#039; howard and then having no licker when he realized he&#039;d been had....and he sees th evidence of his &#039;glory &#039;in th book sales stats

Kroger ha done very well for himself , no glory ...but monies and within Liberal Party respect I tink Kroger came out well , and certainly in front of his mate Costello and get Kroger away from partisan politcs and he&#039;s an able man  

.
Centre 
p/s &quot;Swan is an economist. A real one &quot;
thats no recommendation being a &#039;but , if  what , when , maybe&#039; person after th event  Question is whether a pollie is able to listen &amp; understand differing econamic advice and then has capacity to develop overall frameworks for planned outcomes both politcaly , socialy and econamicaly given trends</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ShowsOn  &#8220;I can see exactly why he and Costello formed a faction; Costello was too gutless to become P.M., Kroger was too gutless to become an M.P.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well tink you ar also unfair tonite there &#8230;on Michael Kroger</p>
<p>These Uni mates and &#8216;Nichols&#8217; supporters followed diferent paths Costell for &#8220;glory&#8221; and Kroger for money </p>
<p>Now Costello thought he had attained &#8216;glory&#8217; as 12 years revered Treasurer but now finds there is no glory in being deemed too naive initialy in &#8216;beleiving&#8217; howard and then having no licker when he realized he&#8217;d been had&#8230;.and he sees th evidence of his &#8216;glory &#8216;in th book sales stats</p>
<p>Kroger ha done very well for himself , no glory &#8230;but monies and within Liberal Party respect I tink Kroger came out well , and certainly in front of his mate Costello and get Kroger away from partisan politcs and he&#8217;s an able man  </p>
<p>.<br />
Centre<br />
p/s &#8220;Swan is an economist. A real one &#8221;<br />
thats no recommendation being a &#8216;but , if  what , when , maybe&#8217; person after th event  Question is whether a pollie is able to listen &amp; understand differing econamic advice and then has capacity to develop overall frameworks for planned outcomes both politcaly , socialy and econamicaly given trends</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218201</link>
		<dc:creator>Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218201</guid>
		<description>And Obama will always like the Labor Party more than the Liberal Party.

Thanks to Coconut :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And Obama will always like the Labor Party more than the Liberal Party.</p>
<p>Thanks to Coconut <img src='http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/wp-content/mu-plugins/tango-smilies/tango/face-smile.png' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218200</link>
		<dc:creator>Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218200</guid>
		<description>Kroger also said that Rudd or Swan could never lead a company like BHP. 

Well they hadn&#039;t applied. Not like his mate Tip who was obviously inundated with all these offers LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kroger also said that Rudd or Swan could never lead a company like BHP. </p>
<p>Well they hadn&#8217;t applied. Not like his mate Tip who was obviously inundated with all these offers LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Canberra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218199</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Canberra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218199</guid>
		<description>Here is a new twist on frostyreceptiongate. *Everyone* gave Bush a frosty reception at the G20. The brutal fact is that Bush doesn&#039;t matter any more and no-one has to pretend to defer to him anymore, so whether he likes Rudd or not doesn&#039;t matter one little bit. Everyone seems to know this except the Liberal Party of Australia.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/20/world-leaders-dont-shake_n_145141.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a new twist on frostyreceptiongate. *Everyone* gave Bush a frosty reception at the G20. The brutal fact is that Bush doesn&#8217;t matter any more and no-one has to pretend to defer to him anymore, so whether he likes Rudd or not doesn&#8217;t matter one little bit. Everyone seems to know this except the Liberal Party of Australia.<br />
<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/20/world-leaders-dont-shake_n_145141.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/20/world-leaders-dont-shake_n_145141.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218198</link>
		<dc:creator>Centre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218198</guid>
		<description>Shows, he criticised Swan for not being experienced. Swan is an economist. A real one. He knows far more than Costello about economics. Anyone who knows what they are talking about knows that. Costello was treasurer at a time of prosperity and a resources boom. Now times are serious. We don&#039;t need a Question Time clown or a lightweight who couldn&#039;t even value an insurance company, in charge of the finances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shows, he criticised Swan for not being experienced. Swan is an economist. A real one. He knows far more than Costello about economics. Anyone who knows what they are talking about knows that. Costello was treasurer at a time of prosperity and a resources boom. Now times are serious. We don&#8217;t need a Question Time clown or a lightweight who couldn&#8217;t even value an insurance company, in charge of the finances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218197</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:39:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218197</guid>
		<description>Bushfire Bill

#981
&quot;For those who reckon Grattan is one of the few “decent journalists”, read this and weep. After she spends half her article talking up the twin monsters of recession and deficit, she writes this:

The reason the Government doesn&#039;t want to speculate about a recession is obvious. To do so increases fear, which plays into business decisions. As Stevens said, &quot;given the underlying strengths of the economy, about the biggest mistake we could make would be to talk ourselves into unnecessary economic weakness&quot;.

Do tell, La Stupenda? I suppose it’s OK for journalists to continually write it up though?&quot;

I tink you ar being unfair to Michelle grattan on this article I&#039;ve always thought she is th most talented and objective politcal journao by a long way and what she says there is accurate and econamicaly sound ....recognising why Swan avoids th words however its fair game for journos to speculate thats there job Unfortunately some ar too partisan and contribute to th very thing Swan is trying to avoid It would be irespoinsible for Swan to do otherwise , which Michelle Gratttan sensibly acknowledges

I may add BB that if she gives a &#039;hit&#039; on th Govt you may find often its justified</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bushfire Bill</p>
<p>#981<br />
&#8220;For those who reckon Grattan is one of the few “decent journalists”, read this and weep. After she spends half her article talking up the twin monsters of recession and deficit, she writes this:</p>
<p>The reason the Government doesn&#8217;t want to speculate about a recession is obvious. To do so increases fear, which plays into business decisions. As Stevens said, &#8220;given the underlying strengths of the economy, about the biggest mistake we could make would be to talk ourselves into unnecessary economic weakness&#8221;.</p>
<p>Do tell, La Stupenda? I suppose it’s OK for journalists to continually write it up though?&#8221;</p>
<p>I tink you ar being unfair to Michelle grattan on this article I&#8217;ve always thought she is th most talented and objective politcal journao by a long way and what she says there is accurate and econamicaly sound &#8230;.recognising why Swan avoids th words however its fair game for journos to speculate thats there job Unfortunately some ar too partisan and contribute to th very thing Swan is trying to avoid It would be irespoinsible for Swan to do otherwise , which Michelle Gratttan sensibly acknowledges</p>
<p>I may add BB that if she gives a &#8216;hit&#8217; on th Govt you may find often its justified</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShowsOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/17/acnielsen-55-45-5/comment-page-21/#comment-218196</link>
		<dc:creator>ShowsOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2110#comment-218196</guid>
		<description>[It was actually quite sad watching Kroger. An old Liberal Party stooge debating their cause as if his life depended on it. ]
I can see exactly why he and Costello formed a faction; Costello was too gutless to become P.M., Kroger was too gutless to become an M.P.

They have so much in common!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>It was actually quite sad watching Kroger. An old Liberal Party stooge debating their cause as if his life depended on it. </p></blockquote>
<p>I can see exactly why he and Costello formed a faction; Costello was too gutless to become P.M., Kroger was too gutless to become an M.P.</p>
<p>They have so much in common!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
