<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACNielsen: 55-45 to Labor in Victoria</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/</link>
	<description>Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 13:43:04 +1100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Canberra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-219580</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Canberra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-219580</guid>
		<description>I think Terry Mulder is next cab off the Losers Rank. Terry Who? I hear you ask, and well might you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Terry Mulder is next cab off the Losers Rank. Terry Who? I hear you ask, and well might you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: triton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-219164</link>
		<dc:creator>triton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 01:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-219164</guid>
		<description>#21
Challenged by whom? I&#039;ve thought for a long time that Louise Asher would be their best bet. She speaks well, handles interviews extremely well and has more charisma than anyone else they&#039;ve got. I don&#039;t know whether her colleagues think differently or she just doesn&#039;t want the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#21<br />
Challenged by whom? I&#8217;ve thought for a long time that Louise Asher would be their best bet. She speaks well, handles interviews extremely well and has more charisma than anyone else they&#8217;ve got. I don&#8217;t know whether her colleagues think differently or she just doesn&#8217;t want the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mexicanbeemer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-219157</link>
		<dc:creator>mexicanbeemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 23:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-219157</guid>
		<description>Adam! very funny! I have the daily enjoyment of sharing a tram ride with the lovely Scotch boys!! can any of them lead the Liberal Party!! look I&#039;m sure some of them are nice chaps but many of them seem unable to do something as basic as doing up a Tie correctly and some look like they need a visit to a hairdresser, but as I say some look Intelligence!

I think the Liberal Party might e better looking to Xavier for its future leaders, or maybe it should go for someone from MLC, there are some very nice looking girls at that school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam! very funny! I have the daily enjoyment of sharing a tram ride with the lovely Scotch boys!! can any of them lead the Liberal Party!! look I&#8217;m sure some of them are nice chaps but many of them seem unable to do something as basic as doing up a Tie correctly and some look like they need a visit to a hairdresser, but as I say some look Intelligence!</p>
<p>I think the Liberal Party might e better looking to Xavier for its future leaders, or maybe it should go for someone from MLC, there are some very nice looking girls at that school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pica</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-219051</link>
		<dc:creator>Pica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 03:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-219051</guid>
		<description>Anybody else heard the rumour Toorak Ted is to be challenged in the next few weeks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody else heard the rumour Toorak Ted is to be challenged in the next few weeks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the first and best</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218539</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom the first and best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 01:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218539</guid>
		<description>It looks like there will not be a redistribution before the next state election.

http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/files/annualreport2007ebc.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like there will not be a redistribution before the next state election.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/files/annualreport2007ebc.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/files/annualreport2007ebc.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goanna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218153</link>
		<dc:creator>goanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218153</guid>
		<description>ok thanks Tom.
So the Greens and Others vote of 17% is the same as it was at the 2006 election</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok thanks Tom.<br />
So the Greens and Others vote of 17% is the same as it was at the 2006 election</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the first and best</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom the first and best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218146</guid>
		<description>http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/State2006resultbypartydistrict.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/State2006resultbypartydistrict.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.vec.vic.gov.au/State2006resultbypartydistrict.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goanna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218140</link>
		<dc:creator>goanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 04:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218140</guid>
		<description>The 17% who did not vote for the major parties seems large to me. 
Is this larger than last Poll? 
I presume the Nats are included in the 39%. 
What is the Green vote, DLP FF, and other minor parties?
Is this information available?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 17% who did not vote for the major parties seems large to me.<br />
Is this larger than last Poll?<br />
I presume the Nats are included in the 39%.<br />
What is the Green vote, DLP FF, and other minor parties?<br />
Is this information available?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Canberra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218131</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Canberra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218131</guid>
		<description>The Libs will hold their nerve until three months before the election. Then they will panic and axe Baillieu, just as they axed Napthine and Doyle. They will then draft whoever is Head Boy at Scotch in 2010 as their new leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Libs will hold their nerve until three months before the election. Then they will panic and axe Baillieu, just as they axed Napthine and Doyle. They will then draft whoever is Head Boy at Scotch in 2010 as their new leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom the first and best</title>
		<link>http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/2008/11/21/acnielsen-55-45-to-labor-in-victoria/comment-page-1/#comment-218130</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom the first and best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 03:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.crikey.com.au/pollbludger/?p=2127#comment-218130</guid>
		<description>How can you be sure that electoral benefit is the main criterion for state Liberal leader?

Some of the polls before Doyle was ousted showed an increase in Labor`s majority.

I know my two statements contradict each other slightly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can you be sure that electoral benefit is the main criterion for state Liberal leader?</p>
<p>Some of the polls before Doyle was ousted showed an increase in Labor`s majority.</p>
<p>I know my two statements contradict each other slightly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
