Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Morgan: 60-40

It’s looking a very merry Christmas for pensioners and families and, not unrelatedly, the Rudd government, which has added a further 1 per cent to its already formidable two-party lead in a Christmas eve Morgan face-to-face poll. Curiously, the Greens are down from 10.5 per cent to 6 per cent in a survey conducted half before and half after the government’s emissions trading scheme announcement of December 15. The slack has been taken up by a spike in the Labor primary vote from 48.5 per cent to 52.5 per cent, their best result in almost seven months. The Coalition primary vote is also up slightly, from 34.5 per cent to 35.5 per cent.

Morgan also produced two sets of leadership ratings last week, one comparing Rudd to Turnbull and the other comparing them both with their party colleagues. Rudd’s approval rating was up four points from the previous survey of October 15-16 to 68 per cent, while his lead over Turnbull as preferred prime minister had blown out from 62.5-24 to 69-20. Worringly for Turnbull, his approval rating was down 13 per cent to 42 per cent while his disapproval was up from 24 per cent to 37.5 per cent, a much sharper turnaround than recorded by Newspoll over the same period (from 50-25 to 47-32). The preferred Labor leader results turned up no surprises, but the Liberal ratings interestingly found Turnbull tied with Peter Costello on 28 per cent. This compared with Costello’s lead of 31 per cent to 20 per cent in the previous such survey of September 10-11, when Brendan Nelson was still leader.

391 Comments

Pages: « 12 3 [4] 5 68 » Show All

  1. 151
    mexicanbeemer
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 8:58 pm | Permalink

    I hope the ALP promote Martin Pakula

    I am surprised with Evan walking!

  2. 152
    Judith Barnes
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    heres what he’s got to say about it.

    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,24850298-5005962,00.html

  3. 153
    goanna
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Maybe evan realised he was not going to get very far without factional support, and did not have the stomach for a long fight.
    He was also in the upper house, so further from where the real power is.
    I guess he can make more money, and feels he is more in control of his destiny in the private sector.
    He was not a political animal like Pakula, and decided he wanted a life!

  4. 154
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:19 pm | Permalink

    goanna,

    Don’t make him a hero. All that was evident before he ran for election two years ago. Quitting now under these circumstances is a disgrace imho.

  5. 155
    Judith Barnes
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:28 pm | Permalink

    it’s about time that those who stand for parliament and resign before their time is up other than for health or severe family probs should wear at least a percentage of the costs of the byelection, might make them think just what they want before standing in the first place.

  6. 156
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    I have some optimism that Downer will get the job done in Cyprus. If he does, he will have earned a tiny positive place in European history. Cyprus is a bit of a Gordian knot in terms of EU/Greece/Turkey relationships, which in turn are a crucial element in any long-term modus vivendi between ‘Christian’ Europe and Islam. Given the fearsomely difficult nature of the problems in Cyprus, it is actually looking positive. See a picture of a smiling MayoFeral hero, and the latest UN spin, at:

    http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=29330&Cr=cyprus&Cr1=

  7. 157
    Winston
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    GG, I think that’s close to the mark.

    I have some third-hand knowledge of his campaign. He had to accept a place in the Vic upper house only because Labor couldn’t find him a Senate seat. Federal Parliament was his main interest so it was second prize. And his position on the ticket meant he only just scraped in.
    Even during his campaign he had doubts – he seems to have a somewhat insecure personality.
    And after being touted as a star candidate it must have been rather humbling to have to accept he Vic upper house.
    My suspicion is that having come into parliament believing he would have a major influence on policy and decisions he has realised how little impact one person can have – especially one without significant factional backing.
    The disappointing thing is that this has come as a surprise to Brumby. Seems that he couldn’t really come to grips with the machinations of politics.

  8. 158
    Winston
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    Vexnews have some interesting comment on Thornley here -

    ttp://www.vexnews.com/news/2109/how-sweet-it-is-thornley-quits-in-an-episode-so-bizarre-jerry-springer-wouldnt-buy-it/

    Mostly reasonable comment although suggestions of a scandal are probably a bit far-fetched.

  9. 159
    mexicanbeemer
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:10 pm | Permalink

    I think there is more to this story but in writing that I suspect others are right he has realised that he isn’t going to rule the world and Evan strikes me as someone who likes to be in control and being a polly isn’t all glory!

  10. 160
    MayoFeral
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:11 pm | Permalink

    Boerwar @ 156 –

    I hope you’re right. The people of Cyprus have endured enough.

    But I’ll believe it only when I see it and even then it might be more a case of success despite his lordship and not because of him. His career is littered with failures, bodies and shattered psyches.

  11. 161
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    Judith @ 155

    Yes, it is a waste of public monies, and irritating. But, if they suffer financial penalties for going early, they may just stick around… nothing is as much a waste of important space as someone serving out their time.

    I would give them an early redundancy bonus just to get rid of them.

  12. 162
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    MayoFeral @ 160
    Yes, loathesome him.
    Just for interest’s sake, what would you regard as his top FAILs as foreign minister, with the criterion being he made a significant personal contribution to the cockup?

  13. 163
    Judith Barnes
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:25 pm | Permalink

    Boerwar, how about the AWB fiasco, he couldnt be bothered to read his emails or dispatches, or the lead up to the Iraq war.

  14. 164
    steve
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    Boerwar, my favorite was the two pandas promised to the Gold Coast that got diverted to Adelaide during APEC last year as a subtle form of Federal electioneering.

    PANDA-monium has erupted on the Gold Coast after Adelaide secured two giant pandas at the glitter strip's expense.

    The Gold Coast's Currumbin Wildlife Sanctuary applied to the Federal Government several months ago to import pandas from China as part of a breeding and conservation program.

    But it was revealed yesterday that Foreign Affairs Minister Alexander Downer had smoothed the way with the Chinese and Australian governments to secure the pandas for his home zoo in Adelaide – a first for Australia since the 1988 Bicentennial.

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,22375646-5013650,00.html

  15. 165
    MayoFeral
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Boerwar 162 -

    Just for interest’s sake, what would you regard as his top FAILs as foreign minister,

    Without a doubt, East Timor. He stymied every attempt by others to warn the Indonesian military off before the bloodshed started. Closely followed by the ‘Pacific Solution’ (totally his idea, as he proudly boasts) with AWB third in a long list.

  16. 166
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, December 28, 2008 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    Ah, yes, how comfortable some people are with the blood and suffering of other people. It is as if the blood never trickles up.

    BTW, did Howard consult Downer on Iraq or was it all Howard’s doing?

  17. 167
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 12:32 am | Permalink

    Here’s a challenge. Read this article and tell me where WA is ranked in the list of state taxes on business.
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24851190-601,00.html

  18. 168
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    Gary,

    It’s a trick question :-)

    LABOR states must embrace business tax reform or risk strangling a faltering national economy, according to a new report that finds NSW is the worst offender for taxing business heavily.

    WA isn’t mentioned because we aren’t a Labor state anymore :-) Though for the record the WA Libs kept carrying on in opposition about the high business taxes here.

  19. 169
    Cuppa
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 2:46 am | Permalink

    Judith Barnes at number 155:

    it’s about time that those who stand for parliament and resign before their time is up other than for health or severe family probs should wear at least a percentage of the costs of the byelection, might make them think just what they want before standing in the first place.

    It’s hard to go past the gall of one Peter Costello for that. Less than one week into his (current) term as Member for Higgins, he was talking about moving on. Lateline, 30 November 2007:

    http://www.abc.net.au/lateline/content/2007/s2106788.htm

    VIRGINIA TRIOLI: What's the longevity of Peter Costello in parliament? Are you seeing the full three years out?

    PETER COSTELLO: I've just been re-elected

    [...

    So I thank the people of Higgins for that and I said I will serve them, I’ll play a constructive role and eventually I’ll move into the corporate sector.

    VIRGINIA TRIOLI: During this term or will you see this term out?

    PETER COSTELLO: Probably during this term.

    VIRGINIA TRIOLI: During this term.

    PETER COSTELLO: This is something that I will have to discuss.]

    Besides coming across as an equivocating jellyfish, he certainly appears less than committed to honouring his commitment to the three-year term to which his constituents elected him in good faith.

    And all because his party didn’t win the election. Wotta sook!

  20. 170
    Cuppa
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 2:47 am | Permalink

    Sorry about the formatting screwup. (Bloody square brackets!) I’m sure you’ll get the gist anyway.

  21. 171
    Boerwar
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 3:37 am | Permalink

    Steve @ 124

    It is an interesting phenomenum – a conservative Government concerned about jobs rather than, in the first instance, what the business and banking CEOs want them to do: Reinforce the privatisation of profits and the socialization of debts.

    The rest of Europe has become quite used to Germany acting in Europe’s interests rather than in German interests. The further we get from WW2, and post-unification, the less reasonable it is to expect the German economy to carry the can for the profligates in the rest of the EU. The screams of the spend-now-pay-later crowd in the rest of the EU for Germany to do something, anything, have abated somewhat as people have come to realize that Germany will act in its own interests and that persuasion, rather than screaming and yelling, that is required. The problem for Merkel is that she is torn between Germany’s formal European commitments and Germany’s immediate national interests. The Eurowelchers, OTOH, look quite likely to tear these up by deed, if not by word.

  22. 172
    Boerwar
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 3:40 am | Permalink

    Cuppa @ 169

    Are you in a glass house?

  23. 173
    Cuppa
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 4:29 am | Permalink

    Boerwar number 172

    I don’t understand your question: “Are you in a glass house?” and how it relates to my post at 169 about Costello not committing to a full three-year term.

  24. 174
    Boerwar
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 7:22 am | Permalink

    Cuppa
    Ah, could have worded it better. The point I was istrying to make that I suspect that members of both Labor and Liberal parties have done similar things in the past. I can’t name names but…

  25. 175
    steve
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 7:40 am | Permalink

    “The point I was istrying to make that I suspect that members of both Labor and Liberal parties have done similar things in the past. I can’t name names but…”

    Boewar, don’t know about the past but the NSW Opposition is determined to do exactly that in the future.

    Mr O'Farrell said that if elected premier he might also go ahead with a sale of the state's electricity industry. This is despite his controversial decision to block Morris Iemma's attempt to sell the industry this year, which led to the downfall of the then premier.

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,24851803-5003402,00.html

  26. 176
    steve
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 8:41 am | Permalink

    167 Gary Bruce according to the WA midyear Review released recently:

    Total Taxation ($ Million)

    2007/2008 Actual 6,447

    2008/2009 PFPS revision 6,287 (Pre-election Financial Projections Statement)

    2008/2009 Mid Year Revision. 5,896

    2009/2010 Mid Year Revision 6,190

    2010/2011 Mid Year Revision 6,641

    2011/2012 Midyear Revision 7,266

  27. 177
    steve
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Oh Dear, the voters have thrown out the lowest taxing Labor Government on Business in Australia. Obviously West Australian voters don’t quite share the values of the IPA.

    State :Tax liability: Ranking
    Western Australia:$195,621 :1
    Queensland :$197,388 :2
    Victoria :$202,421 :3
    Tasmania :$210,179 :4
    South Australia :$219,067 :5
    New South Wales :$222,356 :6

    http://www.ipa.org.au/library/publication/1230428978_document_business_bearing_the_burden_-_report.pdf

  28. 178
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 10:20 am | Permalink

    steve

    That’s great news for Rann! There’s actually a state that gets taxed more than SA. Who would have believed it.

    In the UK, there seem to be plenty of economists with mitres. The Church really gives it to Brown/ Blair. I suspect you could make the same arguments about any Government; morally corrupt, obsessed with money, sacrifices principles for short-term votes and reneging on promises. I doubt that the Church (or Churches) in Oz would get quite so political. Good on the bishops for having a go.

    Five of the Church’s most senior figures said the Government now presided over a country suffering from family breakdown, an unhealthy reliance on debt and a growing divide between rich and poor.

    The Bishop of Manchester accused Labour of being “beguiled by money” and “morally corrupt”.

    The Bishop of Hulme said they were “morally suspect” and the Bishop of Durham said they had reneged on their promises.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/3981635/Bishops-deliver-damning-verdict-on-Britain-under-Labour-rule.html

  29. 179
    steve
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 10:24 am | Permalink

    Diogenes, thank God none of those things happen under Conservative Party rule.

  30. 180
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    Steve

    I don’t recall that great friend of the working class, Margaret Thatcher, being pilloried by the Church like that. She must have been as wonderful as our Tory colleagues say.

    The Church really has problems politically. Most of their beliefs are left-wing; tolerance, helping the poor, turning the cheek etc. But their organisation is aligned with the right. Think of Pell, the Salvos and Howard.

  31. 181
    steve
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    “Spiritual Alzheimers” is what I have seen the churches’ social conscience described as Diogenes.

  32. 182
    mexicanbeemer
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    I might be wrong but I don’t recall the Church of England being a fan of Thatcher!

    With due respect to the churces view the U.K Government has reacted in a proactive manner!

  33. 183
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 11:28 am | Permalink

    mexicanbeemer

    They certainly weren’t fans of Maggie but they didn’t come out as strongly as those comments on Labor. Lots of their criticisms of Labor are fair enough in general but I don’t quite understand what they wanted Labor to do about the GFC. It seems they wanted Labor to lecture the public on spending less, being more responsible and living at a lower standard but that’s what happened in the Great Depression and it didn’t work then.

  34. 184
    The Finnigans
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    Australian Cricket RIP, again.

    Brett Lee is said to have a hot spot on his foot that could lead to fractured and broken foot. methinks Brett actually has a fractured and broken heart that needs mending.

  35. 185
    Glen
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Hehehehe Richie said ’short arse’ lol!

  36. 186
    Roxanna
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 1:27 pm | Permalink

    Australian Cricket RIP, again.

    Time for Haydos to go. :-(

  37. 187
    The Finnigans
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Just after Symonds was dismissed for a quack quack, CH 9 shows a commercial starring Symonds immediately after. That’s the crux of the problem, OZ cricketers are now more of a celebrity than cricketers. Especially with those annoying comm. of the oily chook.

  38. 188
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    The Russians seem to be a forgiving lot. Stalin was recently voted the third greatest Russian, behind Nevsky and someone called Stolypin. After Stalin came Pushkin, Peter I, Lenin, Dostoevski, Suvorov, Mendeleyev, Ivan the Terrible, Catherine the Great and Alexander. What the hell happened to Tolstoi and Gogol? :(

    Former Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin was beaten by medieval prince Alexander Nevsky in a poll held by a TV station to find the greatest Russian.

    Stalin came third, despite being responsible for the deaths of millions of Soviets in labour camps and purges.

    Alexander Nevsky fought off European invaders in the 13th century to preserve a united Russia.

    In second place was reformist Prime Minister Pyotr Stolypin, who was assassinated in 1911.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7802485.stm

  39. 189
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    I believe Anna Bligh is right in calling for the government to issue an apology to Haneef. While it was the previous government that mistreated him, by buck passing an apology Rudd is playing the same game as Howard in refusing to say ‘Sorry’ to the Stolen Generations. That was disgraceful. So is this, IMO.

    Diogenes -

    And Stalin wasn’t even a Russian, but a Georgian!

  40. 190
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 4:44 pm | Permalink

    189 – MayoFeral, I think the big difference there is that the people involved in the stolen generations are no longer with us to apologise. Howard is still alive and kicking and either he or a member of his government still in parliament should have the guts to get up in parliament and apologise.
    Why Rudd should do so is beyond me. His government had nothing to do with it and neither did you or I. Howard and his mob owe Haneef an apology big time though.

  41. 191
    The Finnigans
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    I just love it when Haneef was asked how long he expects it will take the Govt to apologize. He said the Australian people had to wait 200 years, he’s also happy to wait.

  42. 192
    goanna
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

    GG 154, I had no intention of making Thornley a hero.
    He obviously thought he could buy his way into Parliament, but found to really get to the top a lot of hard work and persistance was required. He obviously was not prepared for the hard slog.
    It is a disgrace that he can walk away like this without suffering any personal loss.
    I also agree with all Winston said in post 157

  43. 193
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 5:38 pm | Permalink

    MayoFeral

    So was Beria. There must have been something awful in the water in Georgia in the late 19th century when those two were born.

    The ABC ran a miniversion for Famous Australians. Of course, the results were embarrassing.

    1. Olivia Newton John (pop singer, actress)
    2. Peter Cundall (gardener, TV presenter)
    3. John Farnham (pop singer, entertainer)
    4. Bob Brown (conservationist, politician)
    5. John Howard (Prime Minister)
    6. Fred Hollows (surgeon, social achiever)
    7. Gough Whitlam (ex Prime Minister)
    8. Sir William Deane (retired judge, ex Governor General)
    9. Johnny Warren (soccer player)
    10. Tim Costello (minister, social achiever)

    Not one would make my list.

  44. 194
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes,

    How could they have missed William Bowe?

  45. 195
    MayoFeral
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Gary, the Australian government is responsible for what happened to Haneef. As the enduring identity it is the government that should apologise, especially given that it kept the laws used to persecute him and continues to employ those involved and has indicated no action will be taken against them.

    Many people that, to various degrees, administered the ‘Stolen Generations’ policies were still alive during the life of the Howard administration. In some states and territories indigenous children continued to be taken from their parents until the early to mid 1970s, and some continued to be held in institutions until at least 1980, that is in years when Howard himself was a federal MP/senior minister.

  46. 196
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    At least the A-G should apologise for the actions of the AFP and the DPP. Ministers should be responsible for the agencies they administer.

    It does not matter that Ruddock thinks it was nothing to do with him, he was the responsible minister. But of course I forgot, ministerial responsibilty went out the window after Howard’s first term.

    Andrew’s was a pawn – the Haneef thingy has Ruddock’s paw prints all over it. :(

  47. 197
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    I agree we should apologise to Haneef. In fact, I wonder who in the AG’s department (with a lot of embarrassing past history on the case?) is advising them otherwise? They are up for a bucket of compensation either way – it might actually make Haneef more willing to accept an out of court settlement. after the embarrassment of the failed prosecution itself, we should not assume those dealing with this matter are the sharpest legal tools in the government’s shed.

    BTW Pyotr Stolypin was in many ways a tragic figure – he was a modernising reformer at the end of the Tsarist who began Russia’s industrialisation and tried to improve the social conditions that were leading even then to revolution. There is still debate over who ordered his assassination.

  48. 198
    David Charles
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    There is no need to apologise to Haneef. He is big enough (and ugly enough) to look after himself. If he cannot, Peter Russo will act capably enough for him.

  49. 199
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Dio

    I just saw your post on the UK Bishop’s statement – amazing! It seems to me incredibly unfair and biased. I would say that Brown is one of the most egalitarian leaders in the western world. As Chancellor he pressed for many of Thatchers harshe reforms to be toned down. He has made sure that the UK bank rescues are buy-outs, not bailouts, thus ensuring that mortgagees and small depositors are protected but the taxpayer winds up owning the bank. Perhaps the real reason for it is Brown’s left wing background and, I suspect, anti-religeous, or at least anti-religeous fundamentalism, views.

  50. 200
    ruawake
    Posted Monday, December 29, 2008 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    They are up for a bucket of compensation either way...

    Socrates I doubt it, did the arresting officers do anything wrong? No. Was there political interference? No (according to the sham enquiry).

    The Judge said the DPP evidence was a crock and released Haneef. So no problem there. He was held under “Terror Laws” all perfectly legal.

    Andrew’s revoked his visa – perfectly legal, it is at the Immigration Minister’s discretion.

    But I still think an ex-gratia payment and an apology are very neccesary – and a review to make sure it can never happen again.

Pages: « 12 3 [4] 5 68 » Show All