Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Morgan: 57-43

The latest weekly Morgan face-to-face survey of 883 voters shows Labor’s two-party lead down from 60.5-39.5 to 57-43. Labor’s primary vote is down two points to 48.5 per cent, the Coalition’s is up substantially from 34.5 per cent to 39 per cent, and the Greens are down two to 6 per cent. Between Morgan, Newspoll and Essential Research, there is now significant evidence that some of the gloss has come off the extraordinary spike Labor enjoyed from its response to the global financial crisis.

Elsewhere:

• The Geelong Advertiser reports on the federal Liberal preselection for Corangamite. Prospective nominees: former Kennett government minister Ian Smith, “considering his position”; Graham Harris, head of the party’s Corangamite electorate council; Victorian Farmers Federation president Simon Ramsay; “Moriac district resident” Rod Nockles; Simon Price, unsuccessful Colac Otway Shire Council candidate and former electorate officer Stewart McArthur who lost the seat in 2007.

• Mark Kenny of The Advertiser reports that “pressure is mounting inside the Liberal Party to dump its candidate for the state seat of Newland, Trish Draper”. Draper was federal member for Makin from 1996 to 2007, when she forestalled what seemed to be very likely defeat by retiring. Draper is seen to have been damaged by reports an ex-boyfriend has been identified as a suspect in a murder investigation, which is currently the subject of a defamation case. A Liberal source quoted by Kenny says Right faction powerbroker Senator Nick Minchin has told Opposition Leader Martin Hamilton-Smith to dump her.

• The ABC reports “speculation” that Premier David Bartlett is “planning to visit Tasmania’s Governor on Monday and send Tasmania to the polls as early as April 18”, resulting from the government’s failure to table long-promised legislation to enact fixed four-year terms. Bartlett denies this, and he would have to be pretty silly to ignore the still-accumulating evidence that unnecessary early elections are a bad idea.

• The ABC reports that Labor is courting Beaconsfield mine disaster survivor Brant Webb as a possible state election candidate for Bass.

• An interim report by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters recommends an end to trials of electronic voting for the vision-impaired and overseas defence personnel on the grounds it is too expensive. The report said the 850 votes cast electronically in 2007 cost $2597 each, compared with $8.36 for each non-electronic vote. A dissenting report by Bob Brown argues the government should pursue electronic voting to assist disadvantaged voters, and investigate its use in the Australian Capital Territory and overseas.

• The Australian Parliamentary Library has published papers on women parliamentarians in Australia and the possibility of dedicated indigenous representation, a la the Maori seats in New Zealand.

556 Comments

Pages: « 17 8 [9] 10 1112 » Show All

  1. 401
    Steve K
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    You can do a lot of good with $300M….

    You can do a lot more with 1.3B over three years. I have no doubt whatsoever that Labor will get it’s tax measure passed. To have accepted the 300M would have taken the heat off the independents and the opposition. Let them simmer for a while and turn the heat up to 10.

  2. 402
    Steve K
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    I reckon Fielding will be asking the Govt to reintroduce Malpops in the senate before the year is out and he won’t insist on his amendment. He’ll simply be out to clear his conscience.

  3. 403
    zoomster
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull misplayed alcopops badly, as he did IR, as he did the stimulus package, for the same reason – he simply announced he was going to oppose and expected the government to come crawling to him to ask him to negotiate.
    In doing this, he dealt himself out of the game entirely.
    Imagine if –
    with alcopops, Turnbull had negotiated a range of health measures…
    with IR, Turnbull had negotiated a range of ’small business friendly’ amendments…
    with the stimulus package, he had voted against the cash pay outs but supported the schools package, defence spending, insulation, etc…
    He would now be looking a reasonable Opposition leader who had cleverly used his powers to amend legislation in a responsible manner, rather than a sulky boy who didn’t want to play and then whinged because he didn’t get to bat.

  4. 404
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:29 pm | Permalink

    On QLD, does anyone have any idea how many seats Labor holds on account of Green preferences, or does the preference information not become available until later on?

  5. 405
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    The weird definitions used resulted in one of the funniest episodes of the alcopops saga which was the introduction of “malternatives”, exactly as BB described. You have to give the alcohol industry full marks for ingenuity.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/national/beerbased-alcopop-launched/2008/09/15/1221330777809.html

  6. 406
    dave
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:32 pm | Permalink

    Whats the betting the definition is tightened in this year budget to make malcopop excise rise again OR some other device.

    I really doubt the issue has just disappeared

  7. 407
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:36 pm | Permalink

    zoomster

    with IR, Turnbull had negotiated a range of ’small business friendly’ amendments…

    Turnbull was saying that he did exactly that on Insiders this morning. I just assumed he was lying. Does anyone know if there was any truth to it? This is what he said this morning.

    Now we took a strong stand in the Parliament, Barrie. We made a bad law less bad. We achieved a large number of amendments, particularly to stop Julia Gillard's overreach where she sought to achieve gains to make the union movement even more powerful than it otherwise is, well beyond, in fact in defiance of her own electoral commitments. But we clawed that back.

    We made a bad law less bad so that it will destroy fewer jobs. But nonetheless, if it is a job destroying law then Mr Rudd will wear the consequences.

  8. 408
    Dario
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    AFAIK, none of the Opposition’s amendments passed. Turnbull is full of it.

  9. 409
    zoomster
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    There were something like 230 (more?) amendments that the government accepted, negotiated by the cross benches and the Libs in the Senate, but the way Turnbull’s played the politics, noone’s going to give him credit for them.
    I suppose that’s what I’m pointing to – the perception that he’s created, which is (of course) more powerful than the reality.

  10. 410
    scorpio
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 9:46 pm | Permalink

    Boerwar @ 404,

    On QLD, does anyone have any idea how many seats Labor holds on account of Green preferences, or does the preference information not become available until later on?

    There would be some limited analysis available but a fully accurate assesment of preference flows would only be available after the declaration of the poll. There is a snippet here.

    Mr Lee attributed strong Green preferences to Labor wins in the seat of Ashgrove, held by ALP’s Kate Jones and Mt Coot-tha, held by Treasurer Andrew Fraser.

    Greens polled between eight and 10 per cent on average around Queensland, with some candidates polling.

    Overall they polled 8.2 per cent of the vote which is a small 0.2 per cent swing towards the largest of the minor parties.

    http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/news/queensland/greens-preferences-crucial-for-labor/2009/03/21/1237526403199.html

  11. 411
    fredn
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 9:52 pm | Permalink

    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    I hope she takes them to the cleaners.

    I despise the women, but I couldn’t agree more, even if they were real they having nothing to do with her politics and should not have been published.

  12. 412
    scorpio
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    This comment by John Fairfax could only have been directed at one person. A brownie point for the first person who guesses who he is referring to!

    Firstly, may I say how much I appreciate being asked to give this talk tonight on what is a special occasion for journalism and writing - an occasion recognising some of the quality of what we do and in particular what we write. I am also rather apprehensive about speaking so late at night in front of a room full of journalists, not always known for their moderation or their safe treatment of people on stage during award presentations.

    http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/quality-in-journalism-20090320-949c.html

  13. 413
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Doesn’t matter what their nationality, a conservative only comes with one set of colours! Clueless and hopeless! (MT et. al. have been singing some of these tunes recently as you all know)

    WASHINGTON -- Republicans railed against the Democrats' massive economic-stimulus and spending bills as fiscally irresponsible, but some GOP lawmakers are taking credit for projects in their own districts funded by the measures.

    "Washington needs to stop spending money that it doesn't have," Michigan Republican Rep. Pete Hoekstra said in attacking the $410 billion omnibus-spending bill, which funds the government through September. But once it passed, he touted its benefits for his district, which stretches along Lake Michigan.

    http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123759908731101583.html

  14. 414
    Diogenes
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    I hope she takes them to the cleaners.

    I despise the women, but I couldn’t agree more, even if they were real they having nothing to do with her politics and should not have been published.

    +1

  15. 415
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Was listening to the BBC earlier and heard that health experts were complain that Alcopops was the most common drink among binge drinkers.

  16. 416
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    Some earlier year revealing stories. Alcopops have been seen as big headache for quite some time.

    The Conservatives say they will raise tax on super-strength beer, cider and alcopops to tackle binge drinking if they win the next general election.

    The Tories' want to hit the drinks they believe fuel yobbish behaviour, without penalising "sensible" drinkers.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7282308.stm

    TV adverts for two alcopops have been the first to be banned under tighter rules aimed at protecting under-18s.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/5383504.stm

    Drinkers are being warned about the dangers of alcopops after trading standards officers in Derbyshire scrutinised 20 well-known brands.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/derbyshire/7145849.stm

  17. 417
    Boerwar
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Scorpio
    Thanks

  18. 418
    scorpio
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Thomas Paine @ 416,

    Strangely enough, TP, we never saw any of this information surface during the twelve months that Labor were trying to push this issue and the Coalition and their MSM cohorts made sure that we didn’t.

  19. 419
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Should send that to X and F.

  20. 420
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Trying to find news articles tonight on Rudd’s trip to Washington this week and didn’t find anything worthwhile in my Google search excepting this :-D

    http://tinyurl.com/cc6nnq

  21. 421
    scorpio
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:34 pm | Permalink

    TP, an interesting analysis of Fielding’s stance here!

    Fielding claimed the moral high ground over the alcopops fiasco, saying he had "broken the back of the alcohol hold on Australia" by highlighting the problem of alcohol advertising. But public health advocates said it was a massive boost for teen binge-drinking, and commentators nationwide were scathing. Melbourne's Herald Sun, with a readership of about 1.5 million, led its report on the vote: "Teenage drinkers will soon pay up to $25 less for a slab of Vodka Cruisers, courtesy of Family First senator Steve Fielding."

    Even his own website lit up with antagonistic comments. The comments of one blogger dripped with sarcasm. "Hold your ground Steve. We want to drink long and hard ... Party time!" he said. "Me and me mates are gonna get wasted with these cheaper drinks. Celebrations are here! Orsome!!!! Steve, you're cool."

    In failing to persuade the Government to "un-hook" alcohol advertising from sports broadcasts, Fielding lost several concessions, including alcohol warning labels, an end to self-regulation of alcohol advertising and $50 million in funding for alcohol abuse prevention programs, as well as blowing a $1.6billion hole in the federal budget.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25218292-5013871,00.html

  22. 422
    juliem
    Posted Sunday, March 22, 2009 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    Costello in funding move
    Josh Gordon
    March 22, 2009

    PETER Costello has become a director of his own electoral fund-raising outfit, fuelling speculation he is preparing to stay on in Federal Parliament as he builds a war chest before the next election.

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/costello-in-funding-move-20090321-951f.html

  23. 423
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:01 am | Permalink

    BEST episode of ORDER IN THE HOUSE ever!

  24. 424
    vera
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    Piers and co won’t like this. The article is about bad bosses underpaying workers in Vic being caught by Ombudsman inspectors and it contrasts them with St Therese who is loved by her Pommy employees.

    Ms Rein's WorkDirections came in at No. 24 on the Sunday Times top 100 best companies to work for.

    Workers at her job-placement company were happier than any other firm with their pay and conditions.

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25225465-2862,00.html

  25. 425
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:08 am | Permalink

    Somebody should youtube it then.

  26. 426
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:11 am | Permalink

    AS fun as this?

    Gillard
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkNnZz15cbI

  27. 427
    OzFrog
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:21 am | Permalink

    TP @ 426

    Oh the hilarity! If there is one thing that Julia Gillard can do well, it’s rubbing salt in the wounds of the Liberal Party… and with such razor wit too!

  28. 428
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:36 am | Permalink

    The LNP partyroom is due to meet to elect a leader on April 1

    How appropriate!

  29. 429
    Dario
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    That’s hilarious! Surely they will realise the date and reschedule???

  30. 430
    Bree
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    The new LNP leader will be chosen this Wednesday. It will most likely be Tim Nicholls (a Liberal).

  31. 431
    PAAPTSEF
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 2:48 am | Permalink

    Johnson hit Steyn for 6 to bring up his ton! you beauuuty

  32. 432
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 3:21 am | Permalink

    FFS the USA is morally and ethically bankrupt. It will be a wonder if they ever recover.

    This is just as bad as AIG bonuses and more troubling.

    But another money trail could make voters just as angry: the campaign dollars to members of Congress from banks and firms that have received billions via the Troubled Asset Relief Program.

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/190363

  33. 433
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 3:23 am | Permalink

    Obama will be having to dodge thousands of little sh+t piles on the street to navigate through this term and try and achieve anything. The stench in Washington must be overwhelming.

  34. 434
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 3:34 am | Permalink

    The way they throw billions and trillions around in the US Kev should ask for a lazy $50bn, they wont notice it.

  35. 435
    Boerwar
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 5:53 am | Permalink

    Will the Rudd, the Global Warming Piker, get away with his dud 5% ETS?

    I trust that Turnbull and the Greens will be successful in knocking it off in the Senate: better nothing at all than a bit of flimflam designed to lull the punters into a false sense of security.

    http://www.theage.com.au/environment/state-emission-cuts-futile-and-would-aid-polluters-20090322-95oc.html?page=2

    Of course, if the ETS is knocked off then Rudd gets two things: He is off the hook of his dud ETS and he has a beautiful wedge to use against Turnbull.

    But the other thing he will have earned is an abiding suspicion that we are seeing the consolidation of the HowRudd Convergence Princple:

    ‘Power is everything; everything else is nothing.’

  36. 436
    juliem
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 9:23 am | Permalink

    Good to see the truth come out, coming soon to an internet site near you …

    Over objections from the U.S. intelligence community, the White House is moving to declassify—and publicly release—three internal memos that will lay out, for the first time, details of the "enhanced" interrogation techniques approved by the Bush administration for use against "high value" Qaeda detainees. The memos, written by Justice Department lawyers in May 2005, provide the legal rationale for waterboarding, head slapping and other rough tactics used by the CIA. One senior Obama official, who like others interviewed for this story requested anonymity because of the issue's sensitivity, said the memos were "ugly" and could embarrass the CIA. Other officials predicted they would fuel demands for a "truth commission" on torture.

    http://www.newsweek.com/id/190362

  37. 437
    Gusface
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Good to see the truth come out, coming soon to an internet site near you …

    Juliem
    If you get a chance a really good read is The Commission

    Mrs G and i both read it, and i can tell you a lot of “stuff” was never revealed and the “asscovering” was incredible

    Condi does not come out of it nicely at all!!

  38. 438
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    Boerwar

    A high-level ministerial brief, obtained by The Age, advises the Brumby Government to rethink policies and programs, including subsidies for solar farms and panels and a shift to a hybrid car fleet, arguing that they will not contribute to any additional greenhouse gas cuts under Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS).

    So there will be less investment and subsidies to the renewable energy industry as a result. The Labor apparatchics have said this wouldn’t happen. And now we have a ministerial brief, from a Labor Government, showing that it will.

  39. 439
    juliem
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:33 am | Permalink

    Gus, what is that? I googled what you’ve mentioned and got no likely suspects? Book, website, magazine? Cheers :)

    (oh, if you haven’t yet, read Naomi Klein’s “The Shock Doctrine” [book]. It discusses a reasonable amount about how Iraq was dealt with.)

  40. 440
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    Another problem Australia faces from it’s “balanced” ETS is that other countries will impose green protectionism tariffs on us because our targets are so pitiful. Watch us shed jobs when we start losing our export markets.

    Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry chief executive Peter Anderson said: "The rise of green tariffs would be a nightmare scenario for Australia. We would lose, and lose badly, in a green trade war."

    Of course, we would lose badly because we aren’t actually doing anything and other countries recognise that.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25213629-11949,00.html

  41. 441
    Gusface
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    Julie sorry, it’s a book

    The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation, by Philip Shenon (the Twelve – Jan. 2008), ISBN 0466580755

    ” Philip Shenon’s book chronicles the human frailty and folly that went … The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Commission. By Philip Shenon ”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/04/books/04thom.html

  42. 442
    juliem
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Gus, thanks much, will see if I can turn it up …..

    Can we fast forward to Thursday night? :-D
    Time's running out: 03 days, 07hrs:48mins.23secs|

  43. 443
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:21 pm | Permalink

    I trust that Turnbull and the Greens will be successful in knocking it off in the Senate: better nothing at all than a bit of flimflam designed to lull the punters into a false sense of security.

    Yep, let’s just do nothing, not get into the game at all. That will show ‘em. Great strategy that. Oh and what message will that send to the rest of the world, given that we’re supposed to have this great power over how other countries will react to global warming.
    “If I can’t have it my way well just bugger it, noone can have it.” Sooo grown up.

  44. 444
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Gary

    A bit like Gillard’s attitude to passing FairWork and Fielding’s attitude to alcopops, eh?

  45. 445
    zoomster
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    Except that Gillard had an election mandate on her side and Fielding didn’t know what he was doing.

  46. 446
    dogma
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    I can see what Turnbull and the libs stratergy will be from now on. They will say that the death of WC have caused business to sack people and Labor have said that they will support jobs – that the stimulus package was too big (How’d that work for the borg). It’s not rocket science, you can already see them getting their messaging out in small grab bites now.

    Whether they will be able to sell this in the middle of a Global Recession is a big ask. What they will be trying to do is ask the Australia community to forget about the Global Recession and blame the death of WC on jobs being lost. Again like Qld’s LNP they tried to do the same thing and blame the GLOBAL Recession on the Qld Labor Gov and people thought Springborg was crazy. I think that if Turnbull and the Libs are going to treat people like their stupid, then they will be very disappointed come election time.

  47. 447
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    445 – I was about to respond the same way and while we’re at it I think the government also had a mandate to introduce an ETS didn’t it?

  48. 448
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Anytime Turnbull critcises Rudd’s IR policy the question will come up, well what will you change? That will be the bit that will be hard to sell.

  49. 449
    Cuppa
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    I think that if Turnbull and the Libs are going to treat people like their stupid, then they will be very disappointed come election time

    It looks to me like a case of them reaching out to their conservative base: the stupid, fearful and inward-obsessed. After all, what other mindset would possibly fall for Malcopop’s nonsense of a “Rudd Recession”?

  50. 450
    Diogenes
    Posted Monday, March 23, 2009 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    zoomster

    I think the Greens can argue a similar thing on CC.

Pages: « 17 8 [9] 10 1112 » Show All