Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Newspoll: 53-47

The latest fortnightly Newspoll has given the Coalition its best result since the election of the Rudd government, with Labor’s lead at 53-47 – its narrowest since the 52-48 election eve survey, and essentially the same as the actual 52.7-48.3 result. Labor’s primary vote is down two points to 41 per cent, the equal worst result since Kevin Rudd became leader (the other occasion being October last year, shortly after Malcolm Turnbull assumed the Liberal leadership) and solidly below the 43.3 per cent election result. The Coalition primary vote is 40 per cent, the first time this figure has had a four in front of it since the election.

A somewhat different story from Essential Research, which for the second week in a row finds Labor gaining a point on two-party preferred, their lead now at 57-43. Also featured: perceptions of the government’s handling of the financial crisis (good), expectations of Australia’s economic performance over the coming year (mixed but somewhat optimistic), reaction to Joel Fitzgibbon’s resignation (muted), whether the Greens should support the emissions trading scheme legislation (yes, sort of), whether unions should campaign for more industrial relations reforms (ditto), and whether the government is doing enough to support working people (lineball).

UPDATE: Newspoll graphic here. Explanations for Labor’s decline evidently can’t be laid at the feet of the Prime Minister, who has gained two points on approval (58 per cent) and dropped two on disapproval (31 per cent). Interestingly, Malcolm Turnbull’s ratings have continued to rebound: his approval is up a handsome four points to 44 per cent while his disapproval is down three to 37 per cent, his best set of figures since early February. Preferred leader is basically unchanged with Rudd on 57 per cent and Turnbull on 25 per cent (up one).

3,568 Comments

  1. 1
    Glen
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    I remember that Howard would often go behind the ALP but then come back…

    It is strange to have one side stay ahead for so long as you say Adam…

    Trouble is you get a good poll but Malcolm has nothing to run with this week in Parliament to capitalise on the good numbers…

  2. 2
    lefty e
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    like i said on the other thread, Talcum has actually learned to shut the hell up for a few minutes here and there – & its done wonders for his numbers!

  3. 3
    The Finnigans
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    Glen, your side is running on:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bww2prhAWEA

  4. 4
    Glen
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    Hopefully he will continue then lefty e….

    Maybe this Ocker stuff has bitten lol!

  5. 5
    Centre
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:57 pm | Permalink

    53/47 after the GDP numbers.

    Poppycock.

  6. 6
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Further to the previous thread on my comments on the Four Corners show, I only read earlier comments that the privatisation had been done prior to Labor coming to power later. Therefore I retract that bit of y post 869.

    However the rest stands – WA Labor had years to get this issue fixed, and ample warning. The minister virtually admitted that she didn’t act because she didn’t think most people cared. In other words, she didn’t care unless it was a high profile interview. Another way of saying that is that she had no personal interest at all. She seemed more sorry for herself than the deceased.

  7. 7
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 10:59 pm | Permalink

    Maybe this Ocker stuff has bitten lol!

    I wonder which guru of the media will be the first to nominate that? Milne? “In a forthnight where we realised we didn’t really know just who the Prime Minister was…”

  8. 8
    imacca
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Glen @1

    I think it will be a measure of Malcolm’s ability (or not) if he can find something credible to run with to “capitalise on the good numbers”.

    If the Libs are getting some breaks they need to make the most them. They must be having the best week since getting dumped into opposition! Poll numbers as good as they have ever been, and the most destabilizing influence on their party declaring he is no longer a factor.

  9. 9
    Centre
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    I have to make a post on Cossie exiting.

    1. Congratulations to Ruawake and Gary Bruce. You guys were right, I was wrrrng (incorrect). Gary, crowe tastes like sh!t.
    2. I am flabbergasted that anyone with even the slightest desire to become PM would not have a go and contest an election.
    3. Howard was right all along. Cossie did not have it in him.

  10. 10
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Spare a thought for the Iranian protesters who are currently holding a rally, even though the Government has explicitly told them that it is illegal:
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8099952.stm

    We are all so lucky.

  11. 11
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:06 pm | Permalink

    I’m a bit stunned by all the comments looking to allocate blame.

    Surely the real issue is how quicly and how visibly the State Libs will act to fix this

    For example: 100 transport vans at $2,000 per aircon unit. Cheque gets written tomorrow morning, 5 vans upgraded per week in some workshop somehwere

    are you out there Barnett??

    We need leadership and action on this issue tomorrow morning!!!! Fix this .

    The who/when discussions are for historians

  12. 12
    evan14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Why would the government have lost so much support in the last fortnight?
    Surely it’s not just because of Rudd’s “Ockerisms”?

  13. 13
    evan14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    And, I must concede Costello was gracious today, all the best to him and his family.

  14. 14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    Polling is not an exact science. Polls move around. Labor is ahead. Relax. Go to bed.

  15. 15
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Mr Squiggle why are you stunned? I’m a bit stunned something that bad happened several years after the Broome incident and the minister and departmental head weren’t sacked within days. It isn’t history till the trials are over, and there should be a few.

    You are right about the urgency though. With the current spare capacity in the vehicle market it should be possible to fix this within weeks not months.

  16. 16
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:15 pm | Permalink

    I’m a bit stunned by all the comments looking to allocate blame.

    Surely the real issue is how quicly and how visibly the State Libs will act to fix this

    For example: 100 transport vans at $2,000 per aircon unit. Cheque gets written tomorrow morning, 5 vans upgraded per week in some workshop somehwere

    are you out there Barnett??

    We need leadership and action on this issue tomorrow morning!!!! Fix this .

    The who/when discussions are for historians

    The only response so far from the WA Libs is a possibility of an ex-gratia payment to the Family, and the possibility of GSL losing the contract when it comes up for review next year – oh and GSL promising to stop road transport with Air transfers IF the contract is renewed.

    The Western Australian Attorney General has said he is reviewing the way prisoners are transported as the contract is up in 2011.

    But he says he has not ruled out the involvement of private companies.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/15/2598553.htm

  17. 17
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    We won’t know if this is the “new order of things” or not for a couple of Newspolls yet. Usually a drop in PV like this can be sheeted home to a certain policy or event. I’m struggling to think of one that’s happened in the last two weeks that would see such a drop but there you go.

  18. 18
    Centre
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    At 53/47, Cossie will probably show up drunk in parliament tomorrow :D

  19. 19
    Glen
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    50/50 if Tuckey and co departed :D

  20. 20
    evan14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:18 pm | Permalink

    Could the endless media bashing of Rudd and the government be starting to have an effect? It’s particularly bad on radio in Sydney where I live, wall to wall pro-Liberal propoganda.

  21. 21
    evan14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:20 pm | Permalink

    50/50 if Tuckey and co departed

    Glen: a few of the other old timers should follow Smirky’s example, Ruddock especially.

  22. 22
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    Gary, crowe tastes like sh!t.

    Believe me Centre, I know. LOL. I’ve eaten plenty.

  23. 23
    evan14
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    I’d be interested to see some state by state breakdowns, N.S.W in particular might be dragging down Labor federally(WA too, for that matter).

  24. 24
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:22 pm | Permalink

    Those of you who read The Australian might like to report here tomorrow morning about how they report Gillard’s devastating attack on their lies about school funding in QT today.

    *Gone*

  25. 25
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Apparently Rudd is still a mile ahead of Turnbull as preferred PM, so I don’t think it is a “hate Rudd” thing.

  26. 26
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    my post at #11,

    Apologies to my fellow bloggers – but this issue has really p1ssed me off

    I was in the back of a divvy van myself once (many years ago now) for probably 10mins, and do you know what the strongest smell was?

    my own sweat…it put me on my best behaviour for years after

  27. 27
    ShowsOn
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    53 is a horrible result for the Liberals. We are almost in a recession, and yet the Government has a swing to it compared to the last election.

  28. 28
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    53 is a horrible result for the Liberals. We are almost in a recession, and yet the Government has a swing to it compared to the last election.

    Primary vote for Labor is lower than at the last election though. However with 40% PV the Libs can’t hope to win an election and your point still stands Shows.

  29. 29
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:31 pm | Permalink

    my post at #11,

    Apologies to my fellow bloggers - but this issue has really p1ssed me off

    I was in the back of a divvy van myself once (many years ago now) for probably 10mins, and do you know what the strongest smell was?

    my own sweat…it put me on my best behaviour for years after

    And as Margaret Quirk pointed out, convincing Cabinet for extra funding to improve prisoner transport was the stumbling block – can you imagine the outrage from the flog em and hamg em brigade when you say that you want to IMPROVE Prisoner Welfare when transporting them ? It is not a political vote winner.

    Also, I found that the actions of Laverton Police and the JP in this matter didn’t help either and that there is indeed a racial aspect when dealing with some prisoners, especially for relatively minor incidents.

  30. 30
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    53 is a landmark newspoll for the libs/nats.

    If you allow for a small amount of narrowing during a campaign, this newspoll is the first to show that the next election could reduce the ALP majority.

  31. 31
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:44 pm | Permalink

    I wouldn’t be too concerned about this poll. It still could be MOE. Even if not, Labor’s polls will improve with tax cuts on July 1 and the economy startign too improve. that being said, even when you are governign well, it doesn’t pay to look too smug.

  32. 32
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:48 pm | Permalink

    If you allow for a small amount of narrowing during a campaign, this newspoll is the first to show that the next election could reduce the ALP majority.

    There are only two problems with this theory. Firstly, the Libs PV has also gone backwards from the last election and secondly why would there necessarily be a narrowing toward the coalition and not the government?

  33. 33
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    I would expect a narrowing regardless of who has the upper hand

    numbers in excess of 53% just don’t seem right at a federal level

  34. 34
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    30 Mr Squiggle – Oh and there was one more major problem with it. How does a Newspoll 18 months out from an election indicate anything about what will happen at that election?

  35. 35
    jaundiced view
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    Frank C

    can you imagine the outrage from the flog em and hamg em brigade when you say that you want to IMPROVE Prisoner Welfare when transporting them ? It is not a political vote winner.

    And isn’t this a fine example to illustrate the role of government? Good government does not make every decision based on whether it is a ‘political vote winner’, on the way catering to the most ignorant and prejudiced elements in society. Proper governments do what is right, and are prepared to explain why it is right, ‘political vote winner’ or not. As we know here, the big parties these days have totally caved in to polls and the need to snatch every imaginable demographic from the other big party, regardless of how obviously putrid some groups’ world views may be. As a result we have, for example, unseemly ‘law and order’ auctions in the states election after election. No-one in the major party leaderships has the guts to say out loud that increasing penalties and the misery of prisoners helps nobody, and puts society more at risk.

    For this low pandering, because of nothing more than craven fear of the ignorant voter, to get to the stage where lives are not only put at grave risk, but are actually lost, as in WA in this instance, should not be acceptable to anyone. If anything should be the subject of a Royal Commission, that should.

  36. 36
    Socrates
    Posted Monday, June 15, 2009 at 11:59 pm | Permalink

    I agree JV.

    Put this another way: if this sort of incident had happened to an Iraqi prisoner under Bush what would we have said? You can’t have one standard for their side and another for yourselves.

  37. 37
    jaundiced view
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:19 am | Permalink

    Socrates

    You can’t have one standard for their side and another for yourselves.

    Indeed. Also, the concept of privatising state facilities with a sensitive purpose to avoid blame is another emerging aspect of government behaviour these days too, and that is a most unsavoury element of this WA situation. We saw thaat in Iraq, wiht private groups doing the dirtier work to put up a barrier to government responsibility. The Howard government of course did it with detention centres. I’m sure there are many other examples locally. The NSW government is about to do it with the Sydney harbour ferries, because they can’t manage them properly, and have been getting flack for years over it. So much for the grand traditions of ministerial responsilibility.

  38. 38
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:27 am | Permalink

    The NSW government is about to do it with the Sydney harbour ferries, because they can’t manage them properly, and have been getting flack for years over it.

    About to do with the prisons as well.

    I swear, they’re having the worst luck.

    The day before they announce a roll out of Tasers, someone in Queensland is kill and there is an inquiry into their overuse in an incident in Sydney.

    During their attempt to privatise electricity, evidence emerges that it hasn’t achieved it’s goals of increasing competition in the market in Queensland.

    During their attempt to privatise the prisons, another scandal emerges over pathetic treatment of prisoners by private contractors.

    One would think that these were more than coincidences. Poor policy even.

  39. 39
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    During their attempt to privatise the prisons, another scandal emerges over pathetic treatment of prisoners by private contractors.

    And the Wa Libs haven’t ruled out not privatising the New Derby Prison and another proposed new Prision either.

  40. 40
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:41 am | Permalink

    No 38

    Oz, privatisation is the only way to evade the strangulating grip of the unions in NSW.

  41. 41
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:55 am | Permalink

    Oz, privatisation is the only way to evade the strangulating grip of the unions in NSW.

    But don’t you agree that you are displaying hypocricy in that last statement, while tut tutting the treatment of Mr Ward by blaming everyone BUT the Privatised operator ?

  42. 42
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:04 am | Permalink

    No 41

    Frank, I never said the private company wasn’t at fault.

  43. 43
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:08 am | Permalink

    Frank, I never said the private company wasn’t at fault.

    Bulldust, you went out of your way to blame Margaret Quirk and the Department and you downplayed the Private Operator’s role in this matter.

  44. 44
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:12 am | Permalink

    GP, may I remind you of one such post ?

    The mere fact of privatisation is not a suitable defence to the incompetence of Labor in managing these issues. The fact that it bought back the same vehicles from GSL/AIM, which it knew to be faulty and inappropriate for long haul transport, is a testament to that.

  45. 45
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:30 am | Permalink

    Massive pro-reform illegal protest currently taking place in major Iranian cities.

    Live blogs:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html
    http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog/2009/jun/15/iranian-elections

    Twitter feeds:
    http://search.twitter.com/search?ands=&from=&geocode=35.7061%2C51.4358%2C15mi&lang=all&near=Tehran&nots=&ors=&phrase=&q=&ref=&rpp=25&since=&tag=&to=&units=mi&until=&within=15

    http://twitter.com/BBC_HaveYourSay

  46. 46
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:43 am | Permalink

    And for those who are interested, this is the Coroner’s Report.

    http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/special_eds/20090615/ward/ward_finding.pdf

  47. 47
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:07 am | Permalink

    Mr Squiggle at 26. Coming home from a young Liberals’ convention were you?

  48. 48
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:15 am | Permalink

    Fulvio,

    Do you have a comment on last night’s Four Corners ?

  49. 49
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:20 am | Permalink

    Oh and for those baying for Margaret Quirk’s Blood, here is the FULL extended interview.

    http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200906/r385585_1799806.asx

  50. 50
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:11 am | Permalink

    Frank, I worked for the Aboriginal Legal service for a couple of years in the mid 1970s, part of that time servicing the Laverton/Leonora area, based in Kalgoorlie. This was in the immediate post Skull Creek Royal Commission era, and relationships between the Police and Indigenous people and their advisors were at an all time low.

    It was hard.

    At that time I came across many good people trying to do their best to ameliorate conditions for the Wongi and Pitjinjara peoples of the area. Not least amongst those who cared and gave freely of themselves for the cause were many Liberal Party supporters and members such as Robert French, now High Court Chief Justice, Chris Ellison and Fred Cheney.

    I therefore don’t think having the compassion and motivation to help the disadvantaged and the oppressed is something that can be measured along party lines or is confined to any particular side of politics.

    I do think that there are people in this world who through ignorance, intolerance, prejudice and indifference, are capable of immeasurable cruelty.

    It was people of such mindset that I and many others from both sides of the ideological divide battled with. I like to think we all made some little difference at the time.

    Bad, stupid and unthinking people exist, and from time to time horrific incidents like the Ward occur, no matter how good or well intentioned those in leadership positions are.

    The reality is, our society in the main is unconcerned about the plight of most of these people and treat them with contempt and indifference. Politically, any Government which tries to help at best recieves no recognition, and at worst is criticised and derided.

    It’s everybody’s fault, mate. Trying to apportion blame is like throwing stones at a mirror.

  51. 51
    True Patriot
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:55 am | Permalink

    Now that the Iranian elections are all done and dusted, can we all stop with this pretence that the people “actually” running that country have any interest in democracy, have any interest in the rule of law, have any interest in the the people of Iran. It is entirely self Interest that these Mullah’s have manufactured this elections outcome. I’m sorry to say this but, Any Olive branch to this regime is completely futile, It is time we acknowledge the current regime in Iran is entirely Illegitimate. As such they can never have Nuclear capabilities. And as such all actual and suspected Nuclear facilities in Iran should be eliminated immediately. As I write this I hope the people of Iran will overthrow the Mullah’s although I have very little doubt …

  52. 52
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:42 am | Permalink

    I remember that Howard would often go behind the ALP but then come back…

    I remember that a good poll for Howard was around the 53-47 mark. :)

  53. 53
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:43 am | Permalink

    The latest fortnightly Newspoll has given the Coalition its best result since the election of the Rudd government, with Labor’s lead at 53-47 – exactly where it was at the final Newspoll before the election, and essentially the same as the actual 52.7-48.3 election result.

    Umm William, Newspoll predicted 52-48 prior to the election…

  54. 54
    Muskiemp
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:19 am | Permalink

    Regarding the 53-47 newspoll. I think that the constant hammering by Turnbull and the Libs of the $300B debt and that 18months ago there was a zero net debt, has had an effect of some voters on Labors ability to handle the economy, it only takes 2% to make such a difference. Even though Labor and the Libs know that the Libs would have had as big or nearly as big a debt because of the GFC, which the Libs refuse to acknowledge and some voters believe that there is no GFC as we are not suffering the effect and of coarse the Libs and their supporters do not tell the voters that we are not feeling the effects of the GFC is due to the Stimulus packages put in place by the Labor Government. The Libs, Labor their supporters and us here on PB know all this Kath and Kim do not or take little interest in every day politics. This shows up in the PPM numbers still favouring Rudd.
    However the 53-47 Newspoll is within the MOE and the Essential Research Poll showing a 57-43 to the ALP. Newspoll could be all noise or a rogue poll.

  55. 55
    OzPol Tragic
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:27 am | Permalink

    Exactly when was this Newspoll’s ringing around done? Only on the weekend 13/14 June? Or was some done the previous week, before last week’s good news?

    Note the following on Oz Election Forums 06/06/09: [url=http://www.ozforums.com.au/viewtopic.php?pid=65106#p65106]Psephology:Not much going on around here.[/url] #2

    quote]BTW, when is newspolling done? OH, whose tolerance of telephone home-invaders is even lower than mine, got a Newspoll phonecall last night & gave the caller the usual “Get lost”. Pity, given our political preferences.[/quote

  56. 56
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:27 am | Permalink

    So they did. Corrected.

  57. 57
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    It is very interesting to note that the person who labelled Kimbo as “no ticker” has now left politics with the label “no ticker” stuck firmly on him.

    Cossie, you no aint got no ticker and life is very just.

  58. 58
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    Interesting that ABC Radio this morning isn’t saying too much about the Newspoll results, a little surprising, but there’s a state budget being handed down in NSW today, and the Iranian situation too.

  59. 59
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:22 am | Permalink

    "He was treasurer in a government which left Australia better able to weather the financial storms of recent times than virtually any other nation in the world. That is something of which he and all other members of that government should be immensely proud."

    Howie: “Peter, you are not the special one”. What about me.

  60. 60
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:23 am | Permalink

    It is very interesting to note that the person who labelled Kimbo as “no ticker” has now left politics with the label “no ticker” stuck firmly on him.

    Cossie, you no aint got no ticker and life is very just.

    Finnegans, well said!
    BTW Our girl Hillary is doing a great job as Secretary Of State.

  61. 61
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:36 am | Permalink

    I thought it was Howard who labelled Beazley “no ticker”.

  62. 62
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:42 am | Permalink

    Cossie has no ticker, Sophie Mirabela has no grace.

  63. 63
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:58 am | Permalink

    Claims that Ahmadinejad came THIRD!! This one’s got life in it yet.

    Mr Mousavi's cancellation of the protest came as sporadic disturbances continued around the Iranian capital, and reports circulated of leaked interior ministry statistics showing him as the clear victor in last Friday's polls.

    The statistics, circulated on Iranian blogs and websites, claimed Mr Mousavi had won 19.1 million votes while Mahmoud Ahmadinejad had won only 5.7 million.

    The two other candidates, reformist Mehdi Karoubi and hardliner Mohsen Rezai, won 13.4 million and 3.7 million respectively. The authenticity of the leaked figures could not be confirmed.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/5540211/Iran-protest-cancelled-as-leaked-election-results-show-Mahmoud-Amadinejad-came-third.html

  64. 64
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:01 am | Permalink

    Inquiries into the CPRS came reported yesterday.

    I haven’t read the economics committee one, but the select committee didn’t throw up anything unpredictable.

    Labour said it should be passed in its current form.

    The Coalition said it shouldn’t because of the economic context.

    The Greens want higher targets and less compensation to EITE industries.

    Xenophon wants higher targets, less complexity and for the Treasury to model other schemes and scenarios.

  65. 65
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    The Supreme Leader’s announced an inquiry.

    Who cares, doesn’t matter who wins anyway, and Moussavi is not even that different to Ahmadinejad.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/06/15/iran.elections.analysis/index.html

  66. 66
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:07 am | Permalink

    Let’s go and bomb Iran if they don’t annul the election result.

  67. 67
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    Fielding’s not convinced.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2599244.htm?section=justin

  68. 68
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:16 am | Permalink

    Let’s go and bomb Iran if they don’t annul the election result.

    All in good time.

  69. 69
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    Psephos

    Nuclear or conventional?

  70. 70
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    Evan dont worry in the next couple of years our good friend Bibi may do just that :D

    Of course that would piss off the ‘moderates’ and enrage the hardliners there but hey…

  71. 71
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:32 am | Permalink

    Fielding’s not convinced.

    Well, when he’s getting conflicting information from different scientists it’s not surprising that he’s not convinced.

  72. 72
    Partario of Sturt
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    Hello bludgers.

    I found this in the news.com.au site and thought some of you may be as amused by it as I was…

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,,25638989-2,00.html

    I just can’t figure out whether the author is being ironic or not. Surely they must be…

  73. 73
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:36 am | Permalink

    I suspect we’ll have a re-shuffle very soon…

    Mr T has a lot more weight to push around his front bench…

  74. 74
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Nuclear or conventional?

    You’d have to ask Bibi that, but I doubt Israel has enough conventional whack to get the job done.

  75. 75
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    Bibi wouldn’t answer. Israel doesn’t “officially” have nuclear weapons.

  76. 76
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Israel doesn’t “officially” have nuclear weapons.

    Unofficial nukes have much the same effect as official ones.

  77. 77
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    Psephos - Nuclear or conventional?

    Diog, not content with your Tienanmen? Now you’re looking for your Hiroshima as well. Good for you.

  78. 78
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:04 am | Permalink

    And if Iran really is the one and only enemy of Israel…then 100 nuclear weapons *half of what they may have* seems reasonable to completed f a country up :D

    I am sure he’d have support from his tolerant and conciliatory Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman :D

  79. 79
    Kit
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    Hello, where is everyone?

    Come on guys, it’s just one bad poll. There’s no need to hide. Let’s stop trying to bomb Iran and focus on the issue.

    For the first time in, what three years, the Coalition is within striking distance. Just because we think that, finally, Shanahan might say something that is factually correct, doesn’t mean we should stick our heads in the sand.

    What’s happened? was it the $300 billion debt? Turnbull’s prowess?

  80. 80
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SLv4mtwsRos&feature=related

  81. 81
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    Psephos,

    Can you point me to the pages in the Oz where they highlight Gillard’s bollocking of their claims of misspending money on schools?

  82. 82
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:32 am | Permalink

    53-47 is not striking distance. Howard’s best polls were 53-47.

    Even if the coalition get a few 50-50, 51-49, 52-48 polls, they’re still not a good chance of winning an election.

  83. 83
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    Who cares, doesn’t matter who wins anyway, and Moussavi is not even that different to Ahmadinejad.

    If the people want Mousavi, then that’s who they should have.

  84. 84
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:36 am | Permalink

    53-47 eh? Must be the dreaded narrowing!!! Next poll when it jumps back up I wonder what the MSM will say (or not say)?

  85. 85
    Kit
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    Bob1234, I was being provocative to try and get a response. But it seems the PBs are sulking.

  86. 86
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    ShowsOn even if Mousavi wins it wouldnt matter a dime the Mullahs have all the real power in Iran…better to have Ahmadinejad because eventually Israel will say enough is enough and Obi wont be able to hold Bibi back :D

  87. 87
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:40 am | Permalink

    GG, I don’t read The Australian.

  88. 88
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Hello, where is everyone?

    Who’s hiding?

  89. 89
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:49 am | Permalink

    Another “most trusted” survey. Politicians come behind professional footballers, sex workers, psychics, real estate agents and even behind journalists.

    http://www.readersdigest.com.au/life/australias-most-trusted-professions-2009/article142043.html

  90. 90
    Kit
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Dario, no one in particular .. but it just seems everyone is avoiding the poll numbers today.

  91. 91
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    Seems Malcolm is way down the ‘trusted’ list

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25643619-29277,00.html

    PIONEERING burns surgeon Fiona Wood has again topped a poll of Australia's most trusted people, while Victoria Cross recipient Mark Donaldson has made his debut in the list at number 2.

    The annual Australian Reader's Digest Trust Survey asked 750 Australians to rate how much they trusted 100 well-known people on a scale of one to 10.

    The poll also asked them to rate professions, with ambulance officers topping the list for the sixth year in a row while footballers, sex workers, politicians and journalists all ranked among the least trusted.

    Dr Wood leads the list from Mark Donaldson, who in January became the first Australian soldier in 40 years to be awarded the Victoria Cross for acts of bravery in Afghanistan.

    Cancer researcher Professor Ian Frazer came in third, followed by environmental campaigner Ian Kiernan, former Test cricketer Glenn McGrath, actor Hugh Jackman, television vet Dr Harry Cooper, entrepreneur and adventurer Dick Smith, Denmark's Princess Mary and children's supergroup The Wiggles.

    At the other end of the trustworthiness scale, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd came in in 64th position, well ahead of Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull in 94th.

  92. 92
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    everyone is avoiding the poll numbers today.

    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.
    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.
    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.
    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.
    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.
    LABOR IS AHEAD. LABOR HAS ALWAYS BEEN AHEAD. LABOR WILL ALWAYS BE AHEAD.

  93. 93
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    “At the other end of the trustworthiness scale, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd came in in 64th position, well ahead of Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull in 94th”.

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25643619-5005961,00.html

  94. 94
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:51 am | Permalink

    Dario, no one in particular .. but it just seems everyone is avoiding the poll numbers today.

    How so? I just posted a comment on them. What more are we supposed to say? The Government is DOOMED??? lol

  95. 95
    Kit
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:53 am | Permalink

    Ok I get the point … we don’t talk in-depth about the polls anymore.

  96. 96
    Kit
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Great.. let’s talk about Iran again

  97. 97
    Benji
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    Its all OK. 53-47 still same (or better) as election result anyways. Lets wait for a few more before we start worrying.

    Always interesting that whenever a decent poll result comes out for the coalition, AM bring out the CEO of Newspoll for comment. No prizes for guessing if we will hear from him if the next result swing back to the ALP.

  98. 98
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:59 am | Permalink

    But what is the point we all know that Morgan, AC Nielson and Essential Research are all biased towards the ALP so of course their numbers might get back up to 55-45 but if Newspoll continues to go down then ill be a happy man :D

    Adam i wouldnt get worried just yet…

  99. 99
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    Ok I get the point … we don’t talk in-depth about the polls anymore

    Given that most of the volume on here for the last week was a s**t fight between the ALP and Greens… probably not.

  100. 100
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Nielsen is biased to the ALP Glen? When did that happen?

  101. 101
    Benji
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    Yes last Nielsen was 53-47

  102. 102
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:03 am | Permalink

    Glen, didn’t the last ACNielsen poll show a similar result to Newspoll?
    What your basically saying is that you only trust one poll. Why? So you believed all those Newspolls that had Labor miles in front?

  103. 103
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:05 am | Permalink

    Glen doesn’t believe anything. He just makes stuff up on a day-by-day basis to suit his argument.

  104. 104
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:07 am | Permalink

    Well i forgot about that last Nielsen but I stand by my comment…

    But in my list of biased polls in order from biggest to least…

    Essential Research (why do they bother?)
    Morgan
    Nielsen
    Newspoll
    Galaxy

    :D

  105. 105
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    Glen,

    I would have thought the best polls for you were the 96, 98, 01 and 04 elections.

  106. 106
    Benji
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:08 am | Permalink

    So Galaxy if least biased towards the ALP, is it the most biased towards the Coalition?

  107. 107
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    Galaxy is worthless until they start polling more often

  108. 108
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    The Advertiser frontpage headline on their website:

    THE HONEYMOON’S OVER

    LABOR'S long-held poll dominance over the Coalition has collapsed, according to the latest Newspoll.

    While Kevin Rudd has maintained a strong lead over Malcolm Turnbull as preferred prime minister, the past fortnight has brought a four-point turnaround in primary voting intentions, with Labor now ahead by 41 per cent to the Coalition's 40 per cent.

    The shift, which followed the resignation of former defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon, puts Labor at its lowest point since last October and well below its 2007 election primary result, when it won 43.3 per cent of the vote.

    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25643454-5006301,00.html

    lol

  109. 109
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:14 am | Permalink

    Most likely Benji :D

    Dario – i tend to agree with you there.

    GG also 49, 66 and 75 :D

  110. 110
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    And 66% of the voters in the webpoll reckon the coalition can win the next election HAHA

  111. 111
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    You remember ‘49 and ‘66 clearly do you Glen?

  112. 112
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    And 66% of the voters in the webpoll reckon the coalition can win the next election

    The Young Libs hard at work.

  113. 113
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:20 am | Permalink

    :D :D :D :D

    Please Broughy dont let us down :D

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2599276.htm

    Former federal cabinet minister Mal Brough now lives in Melbourne but says he has not considered nominating yet because he had expected Mr Costello to renominate.

    “I’m still digesting what Peter has done. It certainly was not on my radar at all,” Mr Brough said.

    “I won’t add to any of the speculation but if people are bandying my name around I guess that’s something to be pleased [with], that they would think that I’m worthy of consideration for such a blue ribbon seat.”

  114. 114
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    You know how bad the polls have been for the Libs when you hear them crowing about a poll result ata door stop that would still see them being well defeated, just not obliterated.

  115. 115
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    You know how bad the polls have been for the Libs when you hear them crowing about a poll result ata door stop that would still see them being well defeated, just not obliterated.

    Yeah, it’s like only being down by 4 tries at half time after originally trailing by 6

  116. 116
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    I note that the NSW and Qld budgets will be covered by Sky News Business channel at 12.00 and 2.30 today respectively. I might give them a squiz. It will be the second last budget for Labor in NSW before they hand it over to the children.

  117. 117
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    Oh the irony! ‘Poor’ Steve. One of your best Bob.

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25643871-29277,00.html

    AUSTRALIAN Greens leader Bob Brown said he was dumbfounded by Senator Steve Fielding's position on climate change.

    Australia's top scientists have so far failed to convince the key crossbencher that global warming exists, but he has not ruled out supporting an emissions trading scheme.

    Senator Fielding holds one of the seven votes the Rudd Government needs in the Upper House to have Parliament approve its plan for emissions trading.

    "I think it's too early to say one way or another," he said.

    "No-one disagrees in climate change. What is in disagreement is it is carbon emissions by man that are driving up global temperatures."

    Climate Change Minister Penny Wong's office is due to present Senator Fielding with more evidence in a bid to convince him that rising carbon levels are warming the planet.

    "Poor guy," Senator Brown said. "He's just caught there with not believing ... or whether he thinks it's all make-believe and somebody's pulling strings and nothing's true at all."

    Senator Fielding met with Senator Wong, Australia's chief scientist, Penny Sackett, and eminent climate scientist Will Steffen in Canberra yesterday.

    "I'm no sceptic, but what I am doing is putting some fair dinkum questions to the Minister and the scientists," he said.

  118. 118
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    No 50

    Well said Fulvio.

  119. 119
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    No 116

    Idiot Roosterdal will of course offer nothing new, a higher deficit and some much needed pork for Balmain.

  120. 120
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    No 113

    Looks like the stars aligned just right for Brough. He should see the nomination for Higgins forthwith.

  121. 121
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    No 120

    He should see = He should seek

  122. 122
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    120

    Of course he’s moved to Melbourne…there is a blue ribbon seat available…and the only other candidates are Hacks…Broughy needs to take the bull by the horns…I’d feel much better about the Libs if we had Broughy on the front bench…

  123. 123
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    120 Generic Person – Yes he can take his seat on the opposition benches after the next election.

  124. 124
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    The Liberals will spend less time on the opposition benches if Brough is back on our team…

  125. 125
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    Let me put the “kiss of death” on Brough though. I actually don’t mind the bloke. He’d be a beacon of light in a very dark place (the opposition party room).

  126. 126
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:57 am | Permalink

    No 123

    I wouldn’t be too hasty in proclaiming that your lot will still be in government. :)

  127. 127
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:58 am | Permalink

    The Liberals will spend less time on the opposition benches if Brough is back on our team…

    One swallow doth not make a government.

  128. 128
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/liberals-risk-losing-costello-seat-in-byelection/2008/02/20/1203467183381.html

    Seems Mal has been after Higgins for a while…

    “Mr Brough spoke at a Higgins 200 Club last year and impressed his audience.”

    “Ross Liebmann, patron of the Higgins federal electorate council, said if Mr Brough decided to throw his hat into the ring he would be “a welcome contestant. He had some good ideas — he’d be the type of person who’d be strong enough to follow his convictions”.”

  129. 129
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    126 – Do I detect hubris after one poll showing the Libs would only be well beaten rather than being obliterated. Oh dear.

  130. 130
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:04 pm | Permalink

    No 129

    Me? Hubris? Oh please Gary. I’ve listened to enough hubris from you lot over the last few years to know that I’m as far away from hubris as possible.

  131. 131
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:06 pm | Permalink

    Dean Laidley sacked – very unfair IMHO

  132. 132
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    Do I detect hubris after one poll showing the Libs would only be well beaten rather than being obliterated. Oh dear.

    It’s quite amusing isn’t it! lol

  133. 133
    Ozymandias
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Me? Hubris? Oh please Gary. I’ve listened to enough hubris from you lot over the last few years to know that I’m as far away from hubris as possible.

    -such humility, GP!

  134. 134
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    NSW cuts home stamp duty

    http://business.smh.com.au/business/home-buyers-stamp-duty-surprise-20090616-ce1w.html

  135. 135
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Brough comes across as arrogant and rough. Without the B he’s rough anyway!

    But I suppose he’s the best chance the Liberals have in an extremely shallow pool.

    Whatever happened to not flying in candidates to seats anyway? Or does that only apply to Labor?

  136. 136
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    No 135

    He flew to Melbourne on his own volition.

  137. 137
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    We need to copy Labor about flying in candidates…it worked for them…

    Dean Laidley has been hard done by the club (North) is broke and his list is poor…

  138. 138
    shakesquiller
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    On Friday last, the Organ recital at the Sydney Opera House was postponed,
    because the air inside was too cold and dry for the instrument to be
    played ‘tunefully.’

    On Australia Day last, an Aboriginal Elder was slowly boiled to death
    over a period of four hours, in the back of a van where the inside temperature was 56 degrees.

    He had no water, food,toilet or air conditioning,and incurred third
    degree burns from the heat of the metal floor, before he died a slow
    and agonizing death whilst being transported the 400k’s to Kalgoorlie.

    The van was driven by two security guards, who had the air-conditioning
    turned on in the front of the van.

    After the man’s death,The CEO of the Company who supplied the van to
    the WA Dept of Corrective Services,and who had been repeatedly warned
    that the vans were not suitable to transport humans in, knelt in the
    grass and said he was sorry to the Aboriginal man’s family.
    The Minister for Corrective Services cried on TV, and said she had been
    aware of the problem for some time, but nobody in the Cabinet Room
    seemed interested in fixing it.

    The grieving family of the dead Aboriginal man have asked for Justice

    Justice for this man’s family, would be the Minister for Corrective
    Services, and the CEO of the Company employed by the WA Government
    be placed in the back of the same van, and driven from
    Laverton to Kalgoorlie in forty degree heat with no water,food or
    breaks for toileting, and no means of communicating with the guards in
    the front of the van.

    If by chance they survive the trip,the Minister would then be deemed
    fit to serve in Government, representing the majority of Australians,
    and the Owner of the van Company,would be fit to tender for
    transportation of prisoners.
    If they don’t survive, the family of the dead Aboriginal man could then
    kneel in the grass, and say sorry to their families, for their loss.

    Injustice would be for either of them to remain in their present
    positions,continuing to collect fat pay packets from the WA government
    whilst carrying out their respective duties at the tax payers expense,
    in air-conditioned comfort, all for the price of an apology.

    Until this country gets people in Government who are capable of getting our Human
    Rights issues in order, we are nothing.

    Bring back Mal!!

  139. 139
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    No 137

    Yes, ultimately, if we want to renew, we may need to fly in candidates. But that’s only going to happen if there is a pretty good chance that we’re going to win. Rudd was way ahead in the polls for much of 2007 so the candidates he flew in were happy to join in.

  140. 140
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    On the House program today:

    Matter of public importance
    “The failure of the Government to properly manage the Building the Education
    Revolution program” proposed by Mr Pyne (Sturt)

    Aren’t they taking a big risk scheduling Pyne to speak _after_ question time?

  141. 141
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    Not sure it was covered yesterday – but how ridiculous is the NSW Government’s decision to declare a ban on foreign imports for government purchases. Rank idiocy that even the QLD Treasurer and the Foreign Affairs Minister were critical of.

  142. 142
    BH
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Triton – does that mean they are going to waste QT or will it be after QT.

  143. 143
    Cilla
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    I’d be happier if it were 55-45 but on the positive side it’s better for Labor if they were kept on their toes.

  144. 144
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:48 pm | Permalink

    Flying in candidates only works if people are ravenous with the government – like after 11 years of Howard, and WorkChoices.

    People aren’t anywhere near pissed off with Rudd.

  145. 145
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:51 pm | Permalink

    #141
    IIRC what usually happens is that they hammer the government with questions on the subject and then cut QT short, say after 1 hour, with the matter of public importance.

  146. 146
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    138 of course but what I will be most unhappy about is that we give seats like Kooyong, Bradfield, Wannon, Higgins to Party Hacks…if we do that we’re a disgrace and deserve to stay a beaten political party…

    We need talent, we need youth and we need people with good experiences to bring to politics…

    It will be a disgrace if Brough isnt given a safe seat. If we dont let people as talented as Brough back into Parliament I will be most unhappy.

    I know Labor have this problem too because at least 30 of their seats are taken up by Hacks who offer nothing to Parliament…

  147. 147
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    Rank idiocy that even the QLD Treasurer and the Foreign Affairs Minister were critical of.

    Here’s the thing – clearly they know that economically and strategically it’s a bad idea. There must be a political reason (I did notice they daily terror was fairly excited about it). Is rank, xenophobic protectionism still popular?

  148. 148
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25641588-953,00.html

    Peter Costello to quit politics; Mal Brough may replace him

    The Draft Mal campaign has already begun by the media…

    :D

  149. 149
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    #144 Glen
    You don’t want too big an an oversupply of talent. There are only so many jobs to go round so you only get a restless backbench if they aren’t mostly hacks.

  150. 150
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    But that is really sad isnt it ???

    Plus if these people are coming in they’ll need a few terms to build up their parliamentary skills so there should be enough spots to fill..

    I dislike hacks…if you didnt know already :D

    We could have a party hack like Sheezel in Parliament or Mal Brough now only a Hack would think we should have Sheezel…

  151. 151
    Winston
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    You don’t want too big an an oversupply of talent.

    Don’t think they really need to worry about that yet Triton.

  152. 152
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    Can anyone explain why there was such a large swing against Brough at the 2007 election? Something like 8%. Several quality Liberal MPs kept their swings to below 2%, some even gained. And this isn’t including WA.

  153. 153
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    I know you are excited at the prospect of Brough (a politician so good that even his electorate voted against him). However, I would have thought the Liberal pre selection processes make it virtually impossible for him to win given the primary role of the local members. I’d say it is far more likely that you’ll end up with a parochial local than a carpetbagger from far away.

    Perhaps he could do a Turnbull stack. But, I doubt he is financial enough.

    Also, note that Shardey has pulled the pin in Caulfield and there is speculation about MLC Andrea Coote.

    Seems like a bit of politician churn in the Higgins area.

  154. 154
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, Brough suffered a 10.32% swing, one of the biggest in the country. Within the top five of Australia’s 150 electorates actually.

  155. 155
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:12 pm | Permalink

    We need to copy Labor about flying in candidates…it worked for them

    Which candidates did we fly in?

  156. 156
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    It was only a 7.3% drop in primaries bob…and a 10% 2PP swing…

    “Loses all the rural areas north and west of Caboolture, gaining newer housing estates in the south around Dakabin, Kallangur and Mango Hill. The Liberal margin declines from 7.7% to 6.7%.”

    http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/guide/long.htm

    + the swings were heavy in QLD thanks to the Rudd factor…

    Flynn a 7.9% swing
    Forde 14.4% swing
    Leichhardt 14.3% swing
    Lindsay 9.7%
    Petrie 9.5%

    Corangamite had a 6.2% swing to the ALP…
    Deakin had a 6.4% swing
    Dobell had a 8.7% swing
    Eden-Monaro a 6.7%
    Makin 8.6%

  157. 157
    Astrobleme
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    This is a little off-topic, but I thought you’d all be interested.

    Do the Labor supporters here agree with the changes the Govt has made to the solar rebate scheme?
    There’s a rather scathing review of it here:

    http://bravenewclimate.com/2009/06/14/solar-credits-just-bad-policy/#more-1469

    Surely the Govt can do better than this…

  158. 158
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    If he was as good as you make out, he would not have had his pants pulled down so badly.

  159. 159
    philofsydney
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    153 Combet?

  160. 160
    BH
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    Wow – do you guys realise that Mr Turnbull is less trustworthy than the journos.

    6% trustworthy as against 9% for print journos.

  161. 161
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    oh come on he got redistributed…had probably one of those lame but effective Your Rights at Work campaigns going strong up there too and add to that he had the Kevin Rudd factor to deal with…

    GG alot of people had their pants pulled down badly on election night 2007 not just Brough…

  162. 162
    BH
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:21 pm | Permalink

    Astrobleme – I heard a solar panel small business bloke on ABC “Australia Talks Back” last night.

    He said he wasn’t worried about the early cutoff by the Govt. – if people hadn’t ordered by now then they were slack.

    He also said the credits were a better idea. So who do we believe.

  163. 163
    Dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    Kit.

    One of the reasons we dont talk in depth about polls is that they keep showing the same thing, within 3%.

    How many ways can you say that the ALP is still going well and is pretty much still in honeymoon territory?

    It just gets boring.

  164. 164
    Astrobleme
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:22 pm | Permalink

    BH

    Did you read the link?
    It’s the multiplier effect that is weird. Why is 1MWh of solar worth 5MWh of renewable energy?

  165. 165
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Glen, your spin means nothing. Brough suffered a two-party preferred swing of over 10%, which was in the top five of Australia’s 150 electorates. Redistributed or not. WorkChoices or not. Queensland or not.

    Top five of 150.

    Over 10%.

    Brough is rough and arrogant. The people overwhelmingly voted him out.

  166. 166
    Astrobleme
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:25 pm | Permalink

    BH

    I should say I am ok with them cutting the rebate and replacing it with a renewable energy certificates. I was over the threshold of the rebate, so I couldn’t have received it. I am better off with the certificate system. The problem is the bad accounting method they use that says that 1 MWh of solar form someone’s home is somehow worth 5MWh.

  167. 167
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    #149 Winston re: Oversupply of talent

    Don’t think they really need to worry about that yet Triton.

    No, but I was actually referring to Glen’s claim of 30 hacks in ALP seats. I think the government would rather have hacks than restless Paul Keatings filling up the backbench.

  168. 168
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Oh Glen, here you go. Redistrib for Longman.

    http://www.abc.net.au/elections/federal/2007/guide/long.htm

    The Liberal margin declines from 7.7% to 6.7%.

  169. 169
    BH
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:30 pm | Permalink

    Astrobleme – I haven’t had time to read your link yet but I will later.

    Must admit I was listening to ATB between 3-4 am today and there were many comments on just that point you have made. Unfortunately in my tired state I didn’t really understand it.

    Will try to when I read the link. Thanks for it.

  170. 170
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    He was born in Brisbane, Queensland, and was an Australian Army officer and businessman before entering politics. Former Family Feud host Rob Brough is his brother. According to an article from The Bulletin Brough has Aboriginal ancestry.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mal_Brough

    A round peg in the square hole of gentry Toorak? You’re kidding me.

  171. 171
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    oh dear, 96% of people on Skynooooows poll dont give a shirt about Cossie’s retirement. A legend in his own mind.

  172. 172
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:38 pm | Permalink

    Why is 1MWh of solar worth 5MWh of renewable energy?

    Because giving people their own solar panels is better politics than just building some kind of RE plant in the middle of no where.

  173. 173
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    The solar credits thing is another example of how when a government screws up their policy and refuses to accept it it can actually be worse than doing nothing.

    The Brave New Climate post is pretty complicated but there’s more clarification in the comments if people are confused.

  174. 174
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Oh and Glen, Brough’s swing in Longman was post redistribution. If you don’t factor in the redistribution, he suffered an 11.23% two-party swing.

    So, a 10.32% two-party swing, post-redistribution. In the top 5 of Australia’s 150 electorates.

    The people acted accordingly with rough Brough.

    :)

  175. 175
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Hope brough stands in higgins. Bring it on

  176. 176
    Astrobleme
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    Better politics is exactly right. Sadly the Govt is focussed on the politics of AGW rather than genuinely attempting to do something about our CO2 emissions.

  177. 177
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Opposition Leader Martin Hamilton-Smith has been forced in State Parliament to withdraw accusations of corruption against the Treasurer and the South Australian Government.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2599657.htm

    Idiot.

  178. 178
    Aristotle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Bludgers, this analysis might be of interest.

    A four by four comparison.

    http://www.ozforums.com.au/viewtopic.php?id=5708

  179. 179
    rogan
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    Re the hacks vs useful types debate. The points are valid, but proceed along the misplaced assumption that the hacks know they are mere hacks and timeservers. I’m quite sure that most MPs see themselves as senior ministers and even potential PMs, at least if the planets aligned. I’m certain that every single MP has ego to burn and is highly impressed with their own abilities. So the hacks are just as likely to become restless as the talent, if possibly over smaller spoils – committee positions, overseas trips, etc. And at least restless talent has a potential outlet by impressing the party room by making useful contributions other than on the frontbench.

    The Libs are likely to have less than 60 HoR MPs in the next parliament, and the Nats can’t be relied upon to produce anyone useful. On any view, that’s not a huge restless backbench, particularly if there’s an element of generational change. Parties are better off getting talent into parliament and worrying about leadership tensions later.

    If you ignore all this and go ahead and pick a seat warmer in a safe seat, they’d better have good fundraising ability, or be bringing some useful specialist knowledge or ability (nb. knowledge of how to stack a branch and do what one is told in internal party machinations is not useful in the relevant sense). It might also help if someone tapped them on the shoulder before preselection, and told them what their future is likely to hold…

    Marginal seats are a bit different, and Pat Farmer types confer a clear strategic advantage, even if they are complete dingbats.

  180. 180
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:19 pm | Permalink

    psephos,

    Bernard Keane gives you the anser about the Ozz’s response to Gillard’s bollocking yesterday.

    http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/16/julia-gillard-gives-the-australian-an-f-on-education-reporting/

  181. 181
    vote1
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:25 pm | Permalink

    “Opposition Leader Martin Hamilton-Smith has been forced in State Parliament to withdraw accusations of corruption against the Treasurer and the South Australian Government.”

    Thats going to help his credibility…

  182. 182
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:29 pm | Permalink

    Thanks GG, and by a strange coincidence, Gillard is giving The Daily Liberal another serve even as we speak.

  183. 183
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:35 pm | Permalink

    Gillard is giving The Daily Liberal another serve even as we speak.

    ….The Daily Liberal. Thats got a far better ring to it than OO.

    The Daily Liberal it is from now on :)

    (Isn’t that also the name of the newspaper in Dubbo ??)

  184. 184
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    The questions leading to the “matter of public importance” begin. I’m not sure that asking Julia a series of questions is going to make the Opposition look good.

    Pyne is now whining about something.

  185. 185
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Pyne is getting the mother of dressing downs by the Speaker.

  186. 186
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:40 pm | Permalink

    Pyne doing his best to get chucked out again.

  187. 187
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:41 pm | Permalink

    Pyne keeps going on about gagging eh? Kinky little bugger. He better be careful or he will end up doing a ‘David Carradine’

  188. 188
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd hasn't ruled out offering former Liberal treasurer Peter Costello a Government appointment.

    http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,27753,25644615-31037,00.html

  189. 189
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Julia must shake with trepidation when Pyne addresses a question to her.

    Or does she lick her lips?

  190. 190
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    It was "a friendly chat" that included the possibility of a future appointment.

    "He was very supportive of some things that I might be able to do to help the country," Mr Costello said, adding he would like to if he could.

    Mr Rudd also revealed he had lost a bet to his deputy Julia Gillard about who would be leading the Coalition to the next federal election.

    "I thought I would be up against Mr Costello," he said, adding Ms Gillard was smarter.

    Ms Gillard interjected: "You owe me 20 bucks."

  191. 191
    Cuppa
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    I hope Costello tugged obsequiously enough at his forelocks as he discussed possible EmploymentChoices with his prospective employer.

  192. 192
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Julia mention us Maoists! HOORAY!

  193. 193
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Julia dealing with pyne and brony bishop without missing a beat

  194. 194
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    Point of Order from Bronwyn Bishop. Julia said it was nice to get a contribution from the future of the liberal party
    Priceless!

  195. 195
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 2:58 pm | Permalink

    Peter Costello may not wait until election

    http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,25644595-5003402,00.html

    PETER Costello has flagged the possibility he may quit Parliament earlier than the next federal election.

    Mr Costello yesterday announced that he would not seek Liberal Party preselection for his safe Melbourne seat of Higgins, but would serve out his current term on the Opposition's backbench.

    "I am very, very happy to serve the term,'' he said today, adding he was open to the possibility of stepping down earlier.

    "I have indicated to the party that once they get the preselection done, if it's in the party's interest to do a by-election, I'm open to that.''

  196. 196
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    I’m told that Pyne has a manicurist’s appointment every day at 3pm, so he gets himelf chucked out every day so he can keep it.

  197. 197
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    I doubt Mal Brough will ever stand for public office again. ;)

  198. 198
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Bob at #188

    Kevin Rudd owes Julie Gillard much more than $20 bucks

  199. 199
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    What kind of a heartless idiot is Peter Dutton?

    Stephen Smith is trying to communicate the Government’s position on the sham Iranian ‘election’, and yet Peter Dutton sits there interjecting!

    Oh my dear, now Dutton takes a point of order!

  200. 200
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:22 pm | Permalink

    And another one!

    Jenkins should name Dutton.

  201. 201
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    What kind of a heartless idiot is Peter Dutton

    I think there is so much rage in dutton – one day he is really going to lose it, big time.

  202. 202
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    It takes a lot to get Smith fired up like that. I wonder what Dutton was interjecting about.

  203. 203
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    The opposition is like the black knight. They keep asking Julia questions, she keeps cutting off their limbs.

  204. 204
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Bring back Jodie!

  205. 205
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:31 pm | Permalink

    Dutton seems to forget he has a 0.1% margin, he should be out door knocking not embarrassing himself.

  206. 206
    triton
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    #199 dave

    I think there is so much rage in dutton - one day he is really going to lose it, big time.

    Yes, his manner always give the impression that there’s extreme anger in there that he’s keeping bottled up.

  207. 207
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    I wonder what Dutton was interjecting about.

    It was “who cares” when smith was outlining the violence etc going on

  208. 208
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    Is Dutton related to Barry Hall ?

  209. 209
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    warren truss trying to argue with julia – will they never learn.

    She is way beyond his league.

  210. 210
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Pyne has raised an MPI – he will lead with his chin and Julia will give it the jab it deserves.

  211. 211
    Cuppa
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    I think there is so much rage in dutton - one day he is really going to lose it, big time

    He lost any vestiges of respect when he called Mr Rudd “the pig of Australian politics”. What a bitter loser.

  212. 212
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:54 pm | Permalink

    This MPI is not going to end well for the Libs.

  213. 213
    BK
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Pyne’s confected anger in delivering the MPI is cringeworthy and reminds one of high school debating

  214. 214
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull must have decided to give Pyne enough rope this week. ;)

  215. 215
    Just Me
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Pyne and Dutton are gifts that just keep on giving for the Labor party.

    And Mal Brough is definitely not the bright future of the Libs, whatever Glen may think.

  216. 216
    BH
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    If Turnbull rearranges his Shadow Bench then Pyne will be gone. He is an embarrassment to all.

    Abbott might be a likely candidate to take his place.

    I heard the Principal of the Hastings School on ABC Regional this a.m. He said he has a builder mate who could do the building cheaper.

    He also said NSW Education Dept. says he can apply for a local builder to do the work. Work is overseen by a Regional Co-ordinator tho.

    He was raving on to the ABC presenter and I couldn’t work out why she didn’t ask him to contact Gillard’s office direct.

    May be a National Party bloke.

  217. 217
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    No 213

    A Labor Hack is not an authoritative voice on the future of the Liberal Party. Labor Hacks have a penchant for meaningless blather, to their discredit.

  218. 218
    Tom
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:15 pm | Permalink
    No 213

    A Labor Hack is not an authoritative voice on the future of the Liberal Party. Labor Hacks have a penchant for meaningless blather, to their discredit.

    Yep, let the liberal hacks run their own party – they are doing a GREAT job!!

    Tom

  219. 219
    Just Me
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Sorry, GP, but I am not a member of the Labor party, or in anyway associated with them or the unions. I have voted against Labor (including for conservatives) on previous occasions. Unlike you, I am not a rusted on supporter of any political tribe.

    If you believe that Pyne, Dutton, and Brough are major election wining assets for your side, then all I can say is enjoy being in opposition, coz you will be there for a long time to come yet.

  220. 220
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:36 pm | Permalink

    A Labor Hack is not an authoritative voice on the future of the Liberal Party. Labor Hacks have a penchant for meaningless blather, to their discredit.

    As do Liberal hacks like yourself GP.

  221. 221
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    GB there are enough Liberal Hacks to think of good ways of changing the Party for the better without listening to tripe from various left wing Hacks on PB…

  222. 222
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    Could be some reform on ACT self-governance.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2599479.htm

    New Home Affairs Minister Brendan O'Connor has welcomed a renewed debate on reforming the ACT Self Government Act.

    The ACT Greens will move a motion in the Legislative Assembly this week calling on the Commonwealth to abandon its power to override Territory laws.

    The move will have the support of Labor and has the backing of the ACT's federal members and senators.

  223. 223
    Just Me
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:41 pm | Permalink

    And Glen’s definition of ‘left wing’ would be…?

  224. 224
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:42 pm | Permalink

    Liberal Great White Hopes and their margins:
    Dutton: 0.1
    Pyne: 01.1
    Keenan: 01.3
    Brough: no seat

  225. 225
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    Anyone who does not vote Liberal…

  226. 226
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:43 pm | Permalink

    The Member for Gippsland said it takes 4 hours to drive from Sale to Orbost. What is he driving? Surely its 2 hours max?

  227. 227
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:45 pm | Permalink

    adam if they werent swept aside in the landslide of 2007 they wont lose this time around…after all the swings wont be on and they’ll get back the protest vote they lost last time around…

    I wouldnt cry if Pyne lost but I’d be unhappy if Keenan or Dutton lost…but then again there are enough Hacks in QLD and WA who should give up their seats for them…re:Washer, Tuckey, Somalay, Slipper…

  228. 228
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Sure it wasn’t Bob Brown talking about cycling?

  229. 229
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    The only way you will get Tuckey out of parliament is in a pine box

  230. 230
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 4:58 pm | Permalink

    Bob Brown banging on about the banks in the Senate. He sadly undermines his own credibility when he talks about economics, which he clearly knows nothing at all about – all he can manage is old-fashioned marxist populist claptrap.

  231. 231
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:00 pm | Permalink

    I still reckon Tony Abbott will lead the Libs after Turnbull.

  232. 232
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:02 pm | Permalink

    Rua that is pure claptrap…

    Tony Abbott should be thinking about when he should retire….

  233. 233
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:05 pm | Permalink

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2599741.htm
    Three arrested over Moran murder. It’s pretty obvious who the 64yo woman is.

  234. 234
    philofsydney
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    It’s pretty obvious who the 64yo woman is.

    For the non-Melbournians among us, who is the 64yo woman?

  235. 235
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Did you hear him today? He still has leadership aspirations, in the distant future. Now what does that mean?

    It is a rallying call to the anyone but malcolm faction.

  236. 236
    philofsydney
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    It is a rallying call to the anyone but malcolm faction.

    It doesn’t matter. Mal will either win the next election and be safe or lose and quit. Then there will no Kim Beazey for the Libs to turn to.

  237. 237
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:14 pm | Permalink

    The last of the Morans
    http://www.theage.com.au/national/judy-moran-arrested-over-des-moran-shooting-20090616-cf93.html
    good riddance to bad rubbish I say

  238. 238
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    Phil we have Hockey???

    Adam, personally i dont see why we should give a rats arse about this…

    Let scum kill scum so long as they dont kill innocent people I say.

  239. 239
    philofsydney
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Hockey’s a nice guy but I don’t think he has, well, the ticker, as they say. (I use ticker as an all encompassing term for ‘what it takes to win’)

  240. 240
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Phil he gets angry easily at least in question time :D and he can get emotional re: Sunrise Election coverage :D I’d give Joe a shot after Malcolm because who else is there?

  241. 241
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    I’d give Joe a shot after Malcolm because who else is there?

    People Skills. :P

  242. 242
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:26 pm | Permalink

    Tony would get 3 votes…

    1 from himself
    1 from Alex Hawke
    1 from Sophie Mirabella

    No Way!

    Mal Brough coming in as the Member for Higgins could get the job ;)

  243. 243
    philofsydney
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:28 pm | Permalink

    Glen, don’t get me wrong, I think that Hockey could well be the leader of the Liberal Party, but I can’t see him winning elections. He’s a Kim Beazley for mine – and I don’t mean that in a bad way. I like Hockey, but I don’t think he can win an election.

  244. 244
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps Phil Perhaps…

    We’ll soon find out if that is the case if the Libs are ahead 53-47 with 3 months to go before the 2013 election :D

  245. 245
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:39 pm | Permalink

    Tony Abbot can’t be an effective leader until he changes his communication style

    He’s absolutley perfect as a head kicker, and as a key player on the front bench, but he’s not quick enough to be a leader. Takes too long to get a point across

  246. 246
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    Dutton is a disgrace
    Pyne is a tool
    Hockey is a windbag
    I guess that leaves Malcopops for Glen and his mates.

  247. 247
    Julian Watson
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Quite amusing.

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/gillards-parting-serve-for-costello-20090616-cgbz.html

  248. 248
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:49 pm | Permalink

    adam if they werent swept aside in the landslide of 2007 they wont lose this time around…after all the swings wont be on and they’ll get back the protest vote they lost last time around…

    I know people who always vote incumbent. You’ve also lost the people who voted Liberal simply for Howard.

  249. 249
    Aristotle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Gary Morgan gives Newspoll a serve, disputing its results today.

    http://www.roymorgan.com/news/polls/2009/4390

    “The latest telephone Morgan Poll released on Friday June 12 and conducted last Wednesday/Thursday (June 10-11, 2009) shows ALP two-party support (57.5%, up 3% from the telephone Morgan Poll of June 3-4, 2009) clearly ahead of L-NP support (42.5%, down 3%).

    Backing this clear ALP lead is the latest ‘face-to-face’ Morgan Poll for the weekend of June 6/7, 2009 ( not yet released) which shows ALP (57.5%) cf. L-NP (42.5%). The complete ‘face-to-face’ Morgan Poll Federal voting intention conducted the weekends of June 6/7 & 13/14, 2009 will be released this Friday.

    Both Morgan Polls show  a very different result than today’s Newspoll (conducted last Friday to Sunday, June 12-14, 2009) which shows L-NP support up 2% to 40%  and a softening in ALP support (41%, down 2%). On a two-party preferred basis Newspoll show ALP support has fallen 2% to 53% while L-NP support has risen 2% to 47% – the closest two-party preferred results from Newspoll since the last Federal Election in November 2007.

    It is hard to believe today’s Newspoll result when compared with the latest two Morgan Poll results.”

  250. 250
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    That’s because Morgan polls are useless!

    Cry Baby Gary!

  251. 251
    Just Me
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:57 pm | Permalink

    @243
    “Tony Abbot can’t be an effective leader until he changes his communication style”

    Abbott is far too set in his ways, is far too divisive, and has way too much baggage. And he knows it. Furthermore, the wiser, harder heads in both the Liberal and Labor camps know it too.

    Abbott’s comments about his leadership ambitions are just his way of letting that unrealistic ambition quietly slide off into the deep, deep blue, never to be seen again.

  252. 252
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 5:58 pm | Permalink

    Off topic a bit.
    The Rudd Government Internet Filter leaks show a internet gambling company Betfair that is registered in Tasmania to provide gambling services. This is on the leaked lists (which I have not seen, because that is illegal) and may or may not be correct (who can tell?).

    There is the obvious problem of blocking a legitimate site that actually pays Tasmania to provide gambling services to Australia and it seems a bit odd that the Tasmanian Greens in their Gambling Policy mention only one company by name…

    Yes, they single out Betfair. They don’t mention any other companies just Betfair.

    http://www.tas.greens.org.au/policy/2006-Tas_Greens_Policy-Gambling.pdf

  253. 253
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:05 pm | Permalink

    There are a few odd things about the latest Newspoll.

    It was advertised as being available at 10:15 on the Australian’s website.
    It was almost ignored by the ABC News. (Not AM or TWT)
    Journalists on Sky were saying it may be a rogue poll.

    Not saying Newspoll is incorrect – just that these things have not happened before.

  254. 254
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    Ru,

    The Libs have also not been crowing too hard which might indicate the numbers are out of synch with their internal polling.

    The poll is also in the opposite direction to ER and Morgan polls allegedly taken at the same time.

    Like you said, it shouldn’t be discounted at this time. However, wait for the next cycle to confirm any trend before jumping to any conclusions.

  255. 255
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:14 pm | Permalink

    No 248

    Too true. Morgan has had a pro-Labor bias for donkey’s years.

  256. 256
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:15 pm | Permalink

    No 252

    GG, we never crow too hard about polls. The only one that counts is election day.

  257. 257
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:17 pm | Permalink

    No 235

    Adam, anything that gives less oxygen to the pointless nightly current affairs shows is a good thing. Good riddance to Moran and her conga line of criminal suck holes. :)

  258. 258
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:18 pm | Permalink

    GP,

    Tell Brendan Nelson that!

    Crowing probably was the wrong word. Their body language and rhetoric is very subdued and half hearted. Not the mannerisms of a group of people who think they’re on the up.

  259. 259
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    No 256

    GG, if anyone seriously believes Labor could get between 58 and 61 percent of the TPP, they are dreaming.

    Rudd’s landslide only gave him 52.7%, and the extreme events of 1975 only gave Fraser 55.7%.

  260. 260
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    GP

    They call us crowing over 53/47 and yet they’ve been crowing about how the natural state of affairs is 60/40 2PP this will never happen in an election for either major party…they are living in la la land if they think this will occur IMHO.

  261. 261
    Aristotle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:26 pm | Permalink

    Criticising Morgan Polls is unfair and unfounded.

    Its final phone poll for the 2007 election found:

    Coalition primary support at 41.5% while ALP support at 43.5%.

    Election result was Coalition 41.8% and ALP 43.4%.

    That’s pretty good, don’t you think?

  262. 262
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:27 pm | Permalink

    No 258

    Exactly right. It beggars belief that they could accuse us of crowing, when they’ve been engaging in hubristic crowing since December 2006 about these polls!

  263. 263
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    Rudd’s landslide only gave him 52.7%, and the extreme events of 1975 only gave Fraser 55.7%.

    1966 56.9%
    1943 58.2%
    SA 1993 61.0%

  264. 264
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:30 pm | Permalink

    Those were under extreme circumstances…

    1966 – Vietnam War
    1943 – WW2
    SA 1993 – Corrupt ALP government.

  265. 265
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    No 261

    bob1234, that you have to go back more than 40 years for such a result indicates how very rare they are. Also, we were in the midst of a war in 1943, so that is not comparable. State polls are also irrelevant.

  266. 266
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    Rua went:

    Journalists on Sky were saying it may be a rogue poll.

    Slowly being educated, sick of being wrong.

  267. 267
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:33 pm | Permalink

    SA 1993 - Corrupt ALP government.

    The State Bank collapsed, Bannon/Labor weren’t responsible but they took the anger for it. They most certainly weren’t corrupt.

    Those were under extreme circumstances…

    Support for the Vietnam War wasn’t an “extreme circumstance”. But the point is that these margins are possible, albeit unlikely.

  268. 268
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:34 pm | Permalink

    [bob1234, that you have to go back more than 40 years for such a result indicates how very rare they are. Also, we were in the midst of a war in 1943, so that is not comparable. State polls are also irrelevant.

    Hardly. What it shows is that landslides of that magnitude are possible. Unlikely as it is.

  269. 269
    It's Time
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:35 pm | Permalink

    It beggars belief that they could accuse us of crowing, when they’ve been engaging in hubristic crowing since December 2006 about these polls!

    Yep, read them and weep.

  270. 270
    Pegasus
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    In today’s Crikey:

    Who cooked up this ELF (Earth Liberation Front) hobgoblin? by Guy Rundle.

    http://www.crikey.com.au/search/%22Who+cooked+up+this+ELF+hobgoblin%22

    Indeed, the fuss serves various parties -- the police, who want a continuous state of low-level threat to justify increased resources, the politicians seeking to increasingly criminalise green protest around dirty energy, the energy companies who want the security for their private activity to be paid for by the taxpayer and put on a quasi-military footing -- and a small number of anarchist groups who want to project power by using the strength of the establishment against itself.

    .....Without wanting to dob anyone in I would guess that Melbourne ELF is a pure hoax by people who haven’t taken on the "green anarchist life" to any degree.

    Alternatively, it may be an inside job. For months now, NSW and Victorian governments have been making loud noises about the increasing criminalisations of civil disobedience directed against power stations -- upping the ante from criminal trespass and damage to specifically-tailored laws adding a premium of up to five years prison for disrupting energy supply. These laws could be applied even when "disrupting energy supply" consists merely of a sit-down protest in an energy company’s office foyer.

    ...In that light, review state minister Peter Batchelor’s weird comment about seeing if "we didn’t need new laws to deal with this sort of thing". Well, we already have these laws -- it’s called "threats and menaces". Convenient to have something like this appear just as the "energy security" debate hots up.

    Am I suggesting that Victorian government labs cooked up a secret pseudo-Melbourne ELF letter? I am emphatically not. I am suggesting it’s possible that someone from the Labor Right or associated swamplands is doing a freelance provocation -- and the language of the letter suggests to me that they are inept at hiding their own background in the political mainstream.

    Anyone care to comment?

  271. 271
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    To put things in perspective the Libs need 50.4% of the TPP vote to secure a majority in the HoR.

    Not going to happen :P

  272. 272
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    Still we only need like a swing of 2% across the board to cause Ruddy big problems…lol

  273. 273
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    I should point out that John Roskam would also be a good candidate for Higgins. Confident speaker, good track record on policy with the Institute of Public Affairs, not a hack. Also younger than Brough.

  274. 274
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    No 271

    Anything can happen. And 50.4 is certainly much more probably than 61. :)

  275. 275
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    No 274

    probably = probable

  276. 276
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    Goodness Gracious Me, Cosssssie has been “bought” by the Ruddster. They met yesterday to discuss possible future job for Cossssie. Money talks, happy happy talk.

  277. 277
    Steve K
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    Glen, Don’t work yourself up in to a lather now.

  278. 278
    dave
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    I thought today in QT the opposition had a bit of a spring in their steps.

    It appears to be spreading – glenn & gp are showing the same symptoms

    :)

  279. 279
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Im not steve I am merely pointing out fact.

    Whether or not it will happen is another matter entirely…

    GP ideally it would be between Brough and Roskam but the Hacks and Costello himself have a lot of power to determine who gets the seat :(

  280. 280
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Another “screw you” from Cosssssie to his fellow Liberals who screwed him.

  281. 281
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    No 276

    Actually, I commend Rudd for keeping an open mind.

  282. 282
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:51 pm | Permalink

    P @ 270,

    Yes I would, some people (cough!.. Rundle) need to be a bit less subtle…

  283. 283
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    #281,

    There will always be more jobs for the Liberals under Labor

    :grin: :lol: :cool:

  284. 284
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:57 pm | Permalink

    No 279

    Costello should make sure his seat isn’t given away to a hack. If he has any sense he’ll put a good word in for Roskam or Brough.

  285. 285
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Bludgers, this analysis might be of interest.

    A four by four comparison.

    cheers Aristotle, very interesting

  286. 286
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    GP trouble is most of the Costello/Kroger candidates if not all are Hacks so it doesnt seem likely im afraid…

  287. 287
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:03 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Do you think the Vic Libs would give a crown jewel seat to a Qld’er? You may not believe me but Brough has had a gutful of politics.

  288. 288
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    He lives in Melbourne now…

  289. 289
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:07 pm | Permalink

    At least we’ll never hear of GP or Glen complaining about candidates from outside of the electorate again from either party. :)

  290. 290
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:09 pm | Permalink

    He lives in Melbourne now…

    So does Brumby – and his chances of getting preselection in Higgins are better than Brough’s. :)

  291. 291
    It's Time
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    You may not believe me but Brough has had a gutful of politics.

    Maybe just a gutful of Qld LNP politics. I think he’s still arrogant and vain enough to have a got in Higgins.

  292. 292
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    The Libs will be very lucky if Rudd doesn’t increase his majority in 2010. The timing will be perfect since the Rudd recovery will be well underway, and the Libs will be shackled to the corpse of WorkChoices and carrying the stigma of having voted against the stimulus bills that saved Australia from recession.

  293. 293
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:13 pm | Permalink

    That right It’s Time, why else would he have moved to Melbourne to a state where there is still a Liberal Party???

    I think Mal wants another crack and I wouldnt put it past him having a go at Higgins…

  294. 294
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    No 292

    Pseph, an extra few hundred thousand people will be out of work by the next election on Rudd’s own figures, so I wouldn’t be so cocky.

  295. 295
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:16 pm | Permalink

    Pseph, an extra few hundred thousand people will be out of work by the next election on Rudd’s own figures, so I wouldn’t be so cocky.

    And as long as we’re better off than other western democracies, Rudd has nothing to worry about.

  296. 296
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Tell that to the people who have lost their jobs bob…

  297. 297
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:18 pm | Permalink

    No 295

    A person who has lost their job doesn’t care about overseas circumstances. They care about how they’re going to put food on their table and pay the mortgage.

  298. 298
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

    Pegasus

    I wondered if it was a hoax. I haven’t seen any evidence that it actually is though. We’ll probably never know. Given the Lindsay pamphlet scandal and the fake emails to MHS almost anything is possible.

  299. 299
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    So the libs are hoping for high unemployment to win the next election. Sorry guys its not going to happen.

  300. 300
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:26 pm | Permalink

    Still we only need like a swing of 2% across the board to cause Ruddy big problems…lol

    Still we only need a swing of 2% across the board to reduce you guys to 51 seats..

    Though I owuldn’t put much store in either cases happening.

  301. 301
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    A person who has lost their job doesn’t care about overseas circumstances. They care about how they’re going to put food on their table and pay the mortgage.

    They don’t lose the ability to use their brains though.

  302. 302
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    Hmmmm, Singapore is going to leave us for dead.

    Now your ADSL2, you are lucky to get 10Mbps and the new Ruddnet is promising 100Mbps by 20??.

    OPENNET consortium which is building Singapore's next generation broadband network will begin installing fibre cables into homes and office buildings from September.

    The consortium, which comprises Singapore Telecommunications, Singapore Press Holdings, SP Telecommunications and Axia Netmedia, will start its work in four clusters - Macpherson/Braddell, Jurong, Middle Road, and Geyland/Eunos.

    It expects to complete installation in 56,000 homes and 1,000 office buildings within the first month and 60 per cent of all homes and offices done by 2010.

    Installation of the cables, which will enable broadband speeds of up to 1Gbps, for homes and offices, is free, and will take four hours.

    http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_391045.html

  303. 303
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    No 302

    Conroy’s stuffed around with broadband. Wasted a year on his useless Request for Policy.

  304. 304
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Indeed Grog it is a fine line…

  305. 305
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:32 pm | Permalink

    Pity our landmass is slightly larger than Singapore’s though Finns. Who wouldn’t want to own the Singapore NBN?

  306. 306
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Conroy’s stuffed around with broadband. Wasted a year on his useless Request for Policy.

    Yep – a complete amateur, only one year!!! Just think of the years Coonan was able to stuff around for; he’s got a long way to go!

  307. 307
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    No 306

    At least Coonan’s policy was going to deliver faster broadband years quicker to disadvantaged bush areas.

  308. 308
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    Singapore is smaller than the ACT by 200 sq miles. So it means nothing.

  309. 309
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:38 pm | Permalink

    Tell that to the people who have lost their jobs bob…

    If you want to feed your political goals off people’s suffering, that’s your and GP’s problem.

    Rudd will continue to act in the national interest and keep Australia better off than other comparable economies during the global recession.

  310. 310
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:39 pm | Permalink

    Pseph, an extra few hundred thousand people will be out of work by the next election on Rudd’s own figures, so I wouldn’t be so cocky.

    To be blunt about this, most of those losing their jobs are young unskilled working-class males, who live in socially deprived areas and thus in safe Labor seats. This is the group who always lose their jobs first in a downturn. Even they turn against Labor – which they mostly won’t – it won’t make any electoral difference. But of course, as everyone knows, unemployment would be much worse without the Rudd stimpacs, and this issue will gain us more votes than we lose.

  311. 311
    Socrates
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    GP 307

    Is that realy true? Did anyone actually put the cash up to deliver Coonan’s policy in the bush? Broadband to the bush is never going to be commercial without govt capital or the right to cream off profits and underinvest in the cities. That is why our current system is so undercapitalised.

  312. 312
    bob1234
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    SNIP: See article 2 of comment moderation guidelines – The Management.

  313. 313
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    No 311

    Coonan put up $958 million, Optus/Elders, an additional $1 billion for WiMax for the bush. Conroy cancelled it when he came to office.

  314. 314
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    Sorry I was wrong Singapore is 710.2 km² the ACT is 2,358 km²

  315. 315
    Socrates
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:45 pm | Permalink

    Further to Psephos 310, why would that demographic (young unskilled males) vote against the governmetn, when the opposition is still ideologically wedded to Workchoices? It would be like a financier voting for someone who wants to stamp out tax avoidance.

  316. 316
    Socrates
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    GP 312

    I said “to deliver Coonan’s policy to the bush”. I haven’t heard any independant expert say what was on offer was anywhere near enough to deliver “the Coonan vision”. How far would that amount ($2bn) have gone? It is less than one 20th of what Rudd is providing for the NBN.

  317. 317
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:49 pm | Permalink

    Australia has crap internet infrastructure – the only people to blame are the guys who were in office for the last decade.

    Indonesia leaves us for dead. :(

  318. 318
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:50 pm | Permalink

    No 315

    Yes, of course it is less than a 20th of what Rudd’s putting up. Coonan’s plan was for wireless, not fibre and thus many times less expensive. And yes, $2 billion was more than enough. Telstra built a 99% population-coverage HSPA 3G network for $1.1 billion.

  319. 319
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    No 316

    Rubbish, ruawake. Telstra’s NextG network is the best of its type in the world. We are ahead of the curve.

    The people who say otherwise are those who use silly comparisons to South Korea, Singapore etc – all of which are countries which are but a fraction of the size of Australia.

  320. 320
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    At least Coonan’s policy was going to deliver faster broadband years quicker to disadvantaged bush areas.

    A dream at best. A crock at worst.

  321. 321
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    GP

    I can’t get NextG, I can’t even get ADSL2. In fact I can’t even get mobile phone coverage.

    To be fair it is because the nimby Greens won’t allow the infrastructure built because they think their kids will grow two heads. :(

  322. 322
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    No 319

    LOL. How convenient. Now the bush has to wait 8 years for anything.

  323. 323
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    No 320

    The Greens are obviously idiotic.

  324. 324
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    Socrates, of course that’s right. The young and the unskilled suffer the most from unemployment, but they also suffered the most from WorkChoices, and they would only vote for the Libs if they thought they would do better under a Lib government, which very very few of them would think.

  325. 325
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    Recount in Iran.

    IRAN'S top legislative body, the Guardian Council, said it is ready to recount votes in last week's presidential election won by hardline incumbent Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, state television said today.

    The council said the recount may lead to changes in candidates' tally, according to the television report.

    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25646262-5005962,00.html

  326. 326
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:11 pm | Permalink

    Psephos

    It’s not just the unskilled newly unemployed worker who will be unhappy though. They will have friends and family who will see their plight. On average, these significant others will be Labor voters but some might be swingers.

  327. 327
    The Wind That Shakes The Barley
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:12 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes:

    With any luck the end of the theocracy in Iran will come soon – if not from the Iranian people, then from those who will not allow the mullahs to get nukes

  328. 328
    castle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    Speaking of jobs, the libs again vote for higher unemployment.

    Treasurer Wayne Swan slammed the no vote, saying it jeopardised thousands of jobs.
    "It comes as no surprise that the Liberals want to play politics with the livelihoods of many thousands of Australians tied up in the commercial property sector, including plumbers, electricians and carpenters," Mr Swan said.

    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/ruddbank-voted-down-in-the-senate-20090616-cgff.html

    DD trigger? Libs impeding business and jobs?

  329. 329
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:17 pm | Permalink

    TWTSTB:

    I watched your epononymous film the other night. A more annoying ending to a film I have rarely seen!!!

  330. 330
    fredn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    Well the I see the senate voted down labor party support for the property sector, morons.

    Now labor can blame falling commercial property prices on the Liberals.

  331. 331
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:20 pm | Permalink

    Before the vote, Greens leader Bob Brown told the Senate he would vote against Ruddbank unless the government agreed to cap the salaries of bank and property chiefs.

    Dick Smith was a fool for bailing out this dill.

  332. 332
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Great first hand account of yesterday’s protest in Tehran:
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/fisk/robert-fisk-irans-day-of-destiny-1706010.html

  333. 333
    ruawake
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    Now labor can blame falling commercial property prices on the Liberals.

    And the Greens, what is Bob Brown doing? Stooopid twerp. Do all Tasmanians have the Harradine gene?

  334. 334
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:27 pm | Permalink

    BB should do us all a favour and not stand at the next election…

  335. 335
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:33 pm | Permalink

    GP, according to Glen, Helen Coonan got the best economic credential after Cosssssie. So her NBN mst be good then. :wink:

  336. 336
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:45 pm | Permalink

    Any claim that young unskilled males have been the first to lose their jobs in this recession is wrong

    This is a global financial crisis and the first companies to cutback jobs en mass were in the finance sector….

    followed by companies that were starved of operating funds by the banks

  337. 337
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:47 pm | Permalink

    Finns Cooooooooooooooooooonan is a light weight and she only has her job because of her experience as a Cabinet minister and shes a Turnbull hugger…

    I think our NBN plan was better for the Bush than Rudds but we could be spending the money on Rudd’s schools second hall on the NBN…

  338. 338
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    All indications are that with the publication of subsequent Newspolls in coming weeks today's Newspoll will come to be seen as a ‘rogue’ Newspoll not accurately reflecting the current levels of support amongst Australian electors for the two major parties.

    Odd for one polling company to comment on another isn’t it? Morgan was I think just pointing out that the current Newspoll is likely to be a rogue. They really should add that rogues do come along every so often and is nothing to do with the polling company changing its ways.

    I also have no problem with Morgan’s face to face since poll figures today will not be those on polling day a long time away. As long as they are consistent they all add to the picture of where the momentum is which is the important picture at present. I had a feeling the Morgan’s f2f picked up movements earlier than the others.

  339. 339
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    Mr Squiggle

    We weren’t saying that unskilled males were the first to get sacked, but they are the ones who are likely to get sacked from now on as unemployment increases.

  340. 340
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 8:53 pm | Permalink

    No 327

    Ruddbank is a waste of time.

  341. 341
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:01 pm | Permalink

    Dio #338 – OK, thanks, I’ll go back in my box now

  342. 342
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:03 pm | Permalink

    I doubt Rudd would fight an election on the Ruddbank bill – it’s too technical. The only possible triggers are the health insurance bill and the CPRS bill. I’m certain Turnbull will eventually pass the CPRS bill. He will find it harder to back down on health insurance because the private health funds and the doctors’ union virtually own the Liberal Party.

  343. 343
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Hmmmm, Singapore is going to leave us for dead.
    ...
    Installation of the cables, which will enable broadband speeds of up to 1Gbps, for homes and offices, is free, and will take four hours.

    Just watching a docco on singapore gardens on Foxtel. In it the host said Singapore is 270 square miles. With Australia at 3,000,000 – Singapore is one hundreth of one percent the size of Australia – I don’t think 10gbps average is anything to be ashamed of for this country.

  344. 344
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Ruddbank is a waste of time.

    LOL! This coming from a guy that supported the Howard government, who put a tax on unflavoured milk for the first time in Australian history.

  345. 345
    fredn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person

    We will see, if your right the stupidity of the Liberals will not mount to a hill of beans, if you are wrong the Liberals are going to look very very stupid, a lot very fast back tracking will be required.

  346. 346
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:05 pm | Permalink

    Ruddbank is a waste of time

    Brilliant analysis GP.

  347. 347
    fredn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:06 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person

    We will see, if your right the stupidity of the Liberals will not mount to a hill of beans, if you are wrong the Liberals are going to look very very stupid, a lot of very fast back tracking will be required.

  348. 348
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:10 pm | Permalink

    BB, size does not matter. :wink: :wink:

  349. 349
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    No 343

    What has that got to do with the price of fish?

  350. 350
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    No 349

    Rudd thinks he’s the king of the world, that the money he’s spending will never run out and will never have to be repaid. We don’t need a government-owned bank throwing its weight around.

  351. 351
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:15 pm | Permalink

    Interesting debate on whether the rich/poor divide. The affirmative team, which argued that only the rich will feel at home in 2020, lost.

  352. 352
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:16 pm | Permalink

    http://media.smh.com.au/world/iq2-debates/debate-australia-for-the-rich-only-368652.html

  353. 353
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Rudd thinks he’s the king of the world

    #349 – he is.

  354. 354
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:21 pm | Permalink

    Landeryou’s contenders:

    http://www.vexnews.com/news/4866/game-on-cossie-keeps-them-guessing-to-the-last-minute-as-the-war-for-higgins-begins/

  355. 355
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    No 352

    LOL – in his own little world, perhaps. :)

  356. 356
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    Rudd thinks he’s the king of the world

    #349 - he is.

    And this calls for a song :-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLPDspFxdNU

  357. 357
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:30 pm | Permalink

    No 356

    May I suggest another?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXs8OS6EdAE&feature=related

    :)

  358. 358
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:33 pm | Permalink

    Actually, this is more appropriate: reshuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0n1iluWl5js

  359. 359
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:35 pm | Permalink

    GP, time for nappy change?

  360. 360
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:37 pm | Permalink

    This is more appropriate for Costello…

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1oNYDEcAxg

  361. 361
    Cuppa
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:38 pm | Permalink

    349-358

    Eight posts by the same person. What is this, the Geriatric Liberal (tautology) show?

  362. 362
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:44 pm | Permalink

    cuppa,

    He’s excited! Turnbull no longer has anyone to blame his poor ratings on. His excuses have left the building.

  363. 363
    Cuppa
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    gg, maybe he need to take his dressing gown and slippers and have a good lie down.

  364. 364
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:50 pm | Permalink

    Cuppa leave the personal attacks on people at the door.

    Be glad you have people like GP and myself to kick around during a debate on the polls and elections…

  365. 365
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:53 pm | Permalink

    No 363

    Who said dressing gowns and slippers were only for old people?!?

  366. 366
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:54 pm | Permalink

    No 364

    Cuppa’s just burning about the fact that he has nothing else to say.

  367. 367
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Craig Thompson MP: Gimme More? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3ceCMpPJgc

  368. 368
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    GP @ 365,

    Certainly not Freddie Mercury

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYYL1vybRU4

  369. 369
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 9:58 pm | Permalink

    Psephos

    The ETS would be a much better trigger. He went to the election promising an ETS and promising not to dump the health rebate. I think he wouldn’t want to dissolve Parliament because it wouldn’t pass legislation that he promised he wouldn’t put forward.

  370. 370
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:04 pm | Permalink

    No 368

    Ah, Queen. Love ‘em to death. :)

  371. 371
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    What the hell is this?? Is this a covert plan to allow John Hill to bulldoze the RAH because it’s got people with swine flu in it? Why do they need the power to destroy buidings?

    Parliament has also today passed legislation that will give the state increased powers in the case of "a more dangerous flu pandemic". In an emergency it will have the power to destroy buildings and animals, and to forcibly quarantine people.

    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25644934-5006301,00.html

  372. 372
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:05 pm | Permalink

    GP then he knows he’s lost the argument… :D

    Ill have my slippers and dressing gown on before long :D

    Turnbull Re-shuffle…

    Malcolm Turnbull (OL)
    Bishop – Foreign Affairs (DOL)
    Hockey – Treasurer
    Keenan – Education
    Ronaldson – Special Minister of State
    Scullion -Human Services
    Hunt – Climate Change, Environment and Water
    Dutton – Health
    Robb – Finance
    Billson -Defence
    Morrison -Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
    Pyne – Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs
    Abbott – Employment and Workplace Relations
    Minchin – Energy and Resources
    Brandis – AG
    Stone -Immigration and Citizenship
    Ciobo – Small Business, Independent Contractors, Tourism and the Arts
    Abetz – Innovation, Industry, Science and Research

  373. 373
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    No 371

    Dio, seems sensible to me. Millions of animals were killed to prevent the spread of foot and mouth.

  374. 374
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:09 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Two women and Pyne. That’s not going to appeal to the 21 st Century electorate

  375. 375
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:13 pm | Permalink

    GG we’ll have Sarah Henderson in soon enough :D

    If there are none talented enough then no big jobs for them.

    We havent got many talented females on our side of the house we need to bring in more by dumping useless bench warmers…

  376. 376
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:14 pm | Permalink

    No 375

    Looks like the ABC did produce some righties after all. :)

  377. 377
    Diogenes
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    GP

    I can see the animal argument but the buildings?

    On a totally unrelated topic, it turns out that conscientiousness, socio-economic status and intelligence are about equal in determining what your status will be in life (which is bad for me because I am bone-idle lazy). It begs the question though why we are less upset by being called lazy than stupid. Suggested reasons are offered here but I like the one which answers the question by quoting a T-shirt.

    “Hard work pays off in the future,
    Laziness pays off right now.”

    http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/06/lazy-hurt-less-than-stupid.html#comments

  378. 378
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    Thankfully yes GP…

  379. 379
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Shorten’s comment on Pyne nailed it…’the Jedi knight of interruption’

  380. 380
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:16 pm | Permalink

    Glen, where is Grace Kelly of Libs Sophie Mirabela? She deserves to look after the Indigenous Affairs.

  381. 381
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Pyne has been woeful…but that’s what you get for not letting him on the front bench till 2009 :D

    Bring back people skills :D

  382. 382
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    Pyne rescued from being savaged by Gillard
    Keenan shifted out of IR where he was invisible
    Abbott given a real man’s portfolio
    Robb buried in finance
    Hunt given all of climate change – a signal that they will cave on this
    Coonan dumped?

  383. 383
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    I would refuse to go on TV with Pyne unless the station agreed to have a microphone mute button to cut out Pyne when others were talking.

  384. 384
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:18 pm | Permalink

    No Mrs Mirabela is not a person i consider of any quality for the front bench…
    I rate Eric Abetz above her :D

  385. 385
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:19 pm | Permalink

    Where’s Senator Johnson? He’s quite smart?

  386. 386
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Coonan is dumped Adam and the able sleeping pill Robb to take her role :D

    IR is a dead issue so it is better off with Abbott who can spend his time as MofOB replacing Pyne…

    Education would raise Keenan’s profile and the other young Turk Dutton to keep his position.

  387. 387
    Keith is not my real name
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Two women and Pyne. That’s not going to appeal to the 21 st Century electorate

    LMAO

  388. 388
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Labor will help you get rid of those useless benchwarmers by defeating them in the coming election.

    I sincerely hope you convince the Liberal hierarchy on your token women Ministry.

  389. 389
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:20 pm | Permalink

    Where’s Senator Johnson? He’s quite smart

  390. 390
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    Johnson is invisible…

  391. 391
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:21 pm | Permalink

    As soon as Rudd shifts Defence into the Senate, Turnbull shifts it back to the Reps!

  392. 392
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:22 pm | Permalink

    GG id rather choose people for front bench roles based on whether they can do the job than whether or not they have something between their legs ;)

  393. 393
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    Most Senarors are invisible. Johnson is a solid performer.

  394. 394
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    What about Barnaby and Warren Truss? Couldn’t have Coalition Unity without them.

  395. 395
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:24 pm | Permalink

    I dont consider them worthy of a mention those traitors they ought to just join our party and be done with it.

  396. 396
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    No 379

    That’s rich coming from the Jedi of Imbecility.

  397. 397
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    Adam then give him human services off Scullion….

  398. 398
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:28 pm | Permalink

    So who has been promoted to replace Coonan?

  399. 399
    Cuppa
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    Jack the Insider gives his Insider’s guff on Brough:

    I’m told he’s given the game away, Ian. Happy to be out of it, too.

    http://blogs.theaustralian.news.com.au/jacktheinsider/index.php/theaustralian/comments/member_for_higgins_will_not_resume_his_seat/P50/

  400. 400
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:29 pm | Permalink

    No 381

    Hey Glen, put me on the “bring back people skills Abbott” list as well. :)

  401. 401
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:31 pm | Permalink

    I’d promote Fierravanti-Wells, she seems capable.

  402. 402
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    Billson goes to Defence
    Morrison comes in too for McFarlane

  403. 403
    The Finnigans
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    whether they can do the job than whether or not they have something between their legs

    Glen, have you checked whether it was still there?

  404. 404
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:32 pm | Permalink

    No 400

    She can be Shadow Minister for the Abolition of SBS. That has been her pet policy since forever. At least she likes bringing it up at each address to the YLs. :D

  405. 405
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    GP she sounds like a Hack…

  406. 406
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    I’d agree with her. SBS is state-subsidised entertainment for inner city yuppies.

  407. 407
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:35 pm | Permalink

    Has good docos mind

  408. 408
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:36 pm | Permalink

    No 405

    It has good coverage of soccer, which I like. Otherwise it’s the channel for tits and bums.

  409. 409
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:37 pm | Permalink

    If you want docos or soccer you can pay for it on cable.

  410. 410
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    No 408

    I do have cable, but Foxtel doesn’t have the rights to the World Cup.

  411. 411
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    The reason is the stupid anti-siphoning laws which prevent pay TV getting much exclusive sports coverage.

  412. 412
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:40 pm | Permalink

    Isn’t Connie F-W a monarchist as well as one of those dreaded culture warriors? Are you just taking the p*ss, Adam?

  413. 413
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    If he can sort out his financial troubles this bloke might be an up and comer for your Ministry. At least you’ll know if he has anything between his legs and has never been known to say a word out of place.

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/money/story/0,26860,25641355-5015795,00.html

  414. 414
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:41 pm | Permalink

    Yes of course she is. I didn’t say I agree with her politics. I said she seems a capable person.

  415. 415
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    Glen: I suggest you bring back Tuckey and Bishop to your shadow ministry LOL

  416. 416
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:43 pm | Permalink

    No GG i think Fat Cat would probably suit the political philosophy of our party than HBB…

    Adam 413 i think she’s a Hack…

  417. 417
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    No 414

    Tuckey would be better than Pyne as MOB. That is how pathetic Pyne is.

  418. 418
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:44 pm | Permalink

    No 411

    Labor has plenty of culture warriors itself. Don’t get too cocky my quaint friend.

  419. 419
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    Tuckey would be better than Pyne as MOB. That is how pathetic Pyne is.

    Pyne is certainly no match for Julia!

  420. 420
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    If he can sort out his financial troubles this bloke might be an up and comer for your Ministry. At least you’ll know if he has anything between his legs and has never been known to say a word out of place.

    And he has had experience hanging around John Howard, though I wonder if Howie’s lack of economic nous was a factor ?

  421. 421
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:46 pm | Permalink

    I actually watch the Senate, Glen. I don’t think she’s a hack, a word that gets thrown around far too easily IMHO. And I don’t see who else you’d promote to replace Coonan, assuming a woman is needed. Kroger, Cash, Boyce, Mary-Jo Fisher (the Mad Librarian)? I don’t think so.

  422. 422
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:50 pm | Permalink

    @413 Capable of what? I’m a great fan of culture warriors as they all keep us amused, but this person seems to spend her time boring the t*ts off everyone else by constantly harping on about all of the deceased Italians she knows. There’s probably a bucketload of them stacking up these days.

  423. 423
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:51 pm | Permalink

    No GG i think Fat Cat would probably suit the political philosophy of our party than HBB…

    But Fat Cat has skeletons in his closet :-)

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/watvhistory/3529819309

  424. 424
    redwombat
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:52 pm | Permalink

    Does Cossie know how to grow carrots?
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/16/2600153.htm?section=justin

  425. 425
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    Adam if you demote a woman you dont need to fill her job with a woman.

    Women need to get jobs based on their ability not based on their gender, affirmative action is left wing claptrap and it is degrading to women.

    If you watch the Senate unlike myself then i would believe what you have to say rather than conjecture in PB.

  426. 426
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    No 421

    Now now Mark, we had ALP true-believers herewith proclaiming how much “talent” Mark Arbib had.

  427. 427
    evan14
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Very clever of Rudd to consider offering Costello a job, that’d put the Liberals in a spin.

  428. 428
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    No 424

    Glen, you’re too right on affirmative action.

  429. 429
    Generic Person
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    No 426

    Doesn’t mean Costello will become an ALP mouthpiece. After all, this is the father of workplace deregulation.

  430. 430
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    GP, I think you and I both agreed on Arbib’s complete lack of “talent”, physically speaking. Then again, I was on my “Greg Combet’s a spunk” rant, so what would I know?

  431. 431
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 10:58 pm | Permalink

    Look what happens when you get affirmative action on the ALP side…

    Jenny Macklin – an ex-communist Hack…woooow soo much talent there.

    Kate Ellis – wow she’ll be PM in nooo time at all *she cant even get her lines right*

    Nicola Roxon – a light weight failed with alcopops, failed with swine flu and hasnt said two bobs on hospitals and playing the blame game.

    Tanya Plibersek – airhead who has been invisible….

    Justine Elliot – who???

    Penny Wong is barely capable and has made serious errors with the ETS but she’s better than the rest of that lot IMHO though i am not a fan of hers…

  432. 432
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    You could always promote Guy the Jesus-botherer Barnett or Gruppenfuhrer Cormann I suppose, but I don’t think you’d like the results.

  433. 433
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Or Chris Back

  434. 434
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:01 pm | Permalink

    Glen, you forgot the evil one – The Guillotine!!! Completely useless, don’t you agree?

  435. 435
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:02 pm | Permalink

    Is it just me, or do these foreign students come across as just a bunch of whingers. They act as though they are doing us a favour and getting nothing in return. If you don’t want a degree, why come here?

  436. 436
    Glen
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Oh well almost in the same league as Pyne :D

    No but seriously Gillard and Wong are the only 2 id have if I were Rudd.

  437. 437
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    If you don’t want a degree, why come here?

    Who says they don’t want a degree?

    Point is, they want a degree, but they don’t want to be subject to racism.

  438. 438
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    Golly, I say something mildly complimentary about a Liberal and all I get is bullsh*t. I should know better.

    And who has failed on alcopops? It’s been a political disaster for Turnbull, and all for nothing because now he’s going to back down and pass it.

    *exits*

  439. 439
    Dario
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Point is, they want a degree, but they don’t want to be subject to racism

    Where is the racism?

  440. 440
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    That’ll teach Adam about being nice to Liberals.

  441. 441
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:12 pm | Permalink

    NEVER BE NICE TO THE LIBERALS!
    and…
    Never be rude to an Arab,
    An Israeli, or Saudi, or Jew,
    Never be rude to an Irishman,
    No matter what you do.
    Never poke fun at a N*gger,
    A Spik, or a Wop, or a Kraut,
    And never put down…

  442. 442
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:14 pm | Permalink

    Glen, Plibersek is very good and Roxon is well respected in the health community. There’s not much she can do about a major virus-with-mutant-animal-gene-PLAGUE!-shock-horror-pandemic-end-of-the-world situation.

    I’ll reserve my thoughts on Elliot. Hoping to interview her soon!

  443. 443
    ShowsOn
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:29 pm | Permalink

    I’d agree with her. SBS is state-subsidised entertainment for inner city yuppies.

    It’s the only channel that plays Wong Kar-Wai, Hou Hsiao-Hsien and Abbas Kiarostami films. It should be retained for that reason alone.

    Oh, but there should be a law stopping it playing adverts during films.

  444. 444
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:32 pm | Permalink

    Oh, but there should be a law stopping it playing adverts during films.

    Which were introduced by the SBS Board during the Howard Years, and whose members included at the time a certain LIberal supporter Carla Zampatti :-)

  445. 445
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:38 pm | Permalink

    ahh yes the evil brethren-howard-zampatti triumvirate

  446. 446
    marktwain
    Posted Tuesday, June 16, 2009 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn, you forgot Inspector Rex. The sole reason for the existence of SBS, now that Mary Kostakidis has left.

  447. 447
    Keith is not my real name
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    “Tanya Plibersek – airhead who has been invisible….”

    Umm, I’ve attended approximatley 9 “big deal” conferences etc over the last 12 months, Plibersek(who I don’t like) has been at four of them

    Hardly “invisible”

  448. 448
    ShowsOn
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:42 am | Permalink

    Anonymous Senator survey:
    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25647653-662,00.html

    One Senator suggested voice recognition software: "Some senators aren't very good at typing. It's much easier to talk to a microphone and then the words just appear on a screen."

    Any money bet that was Fielding.

  449. 449
    fredn
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:44 am | Permalink

    SBS has the only decent international news service in Australia.

  450. 450
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:53 am | Permalink

    Open warfare has erupted over Cossssssie. Pyne Vs Abbott, the two equally headline seeking media tarts. It’s going to get worse as Cosssssie has been bought with ten pieces of silver by the Ruddster.

    PJK got the Reserve Bank in his pocket, now the Ruddster got Cosssssssie in his pocket. there is one consistent thing about Cosssssssie, he likes to be handed job on a plate. :wink: :wink:

    It was provoked the night before, as solemn arguments of great moment so often are, by Tony "People Skills" Abbott.

    "I think there's no doubt that what Peter Costello did today was sacrifice his final chance to be Prime Minister in order to improve Malcolm Turnbull's chance," mused People Skills on the ABC's 7.30 Report on Monday night.

    "I don't believe that there's been an act of self-sacrifice," Mr Pyne said, tartly.

    "I think Tony Abbott likes to use language which will attract media attention and get him into the newspapers, but the reality is Peter Costello decided to retire."

    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/good-lord-at-this-rate-hell-be-back-in-a-few-days-20090616-cgkt.html?page=-1

  451. 451
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:46 am | Permalink

    Costello may cross floor for Labor job

    http://www.canberratimes.com.au/news/national/national/general/costello-may-cross-floor-for-labor-job/1542689.aspx

    Possible reward jobs for Cossssie being a good boy:

    :idea: Chairman of the new NBN company or the Ruddnet

    :idea: Chairman of ABC or the Ruddmedia

    :idea: Chairman of the new Ruddbank

  452. 452
    vote1maxine
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:19 am | Permalink

    Ross Gittins slams Hockey.

    ” In seeking to capitalise on the Commonwealth’s rate rise, Joe Hockey went beyond the pale. “If Kevin Rudd is going to borrow up to $3 billion a day, it’s inevitably going to put upward pressure on interest rates,” he said. The Government’s “borrowing binge” had directly contributed to the Commonwealth’s increase.

    In his anxiety to score a point against the Government, Hockey was willing to reinforce the mistaken and damaging notion that interest rates are on the way up. And to convey the impression that this minor rise is just the first of many, Hockey was willing to bamboozle the public with a patently false economic argument. His argument about the effect of government borrowing on interest rates is simply wrong.

    If we lived in an economy cut off from the rest of the world, where the only money available to be borrowed was our own savings, then borrowing by governments would indeed put upward pressure on the interest rates you and I pay. But for at least the past 25 years, we’ve lived in a world of deregulated and globalised financial markets, in which our banks and big companies can and do borrow heavily overseas.

    In that vast, global market, our Government’s borrowings are a flea bite, quite unable to influence the level of global interest rates.

    If the Opposition persists with such destructive and dishonest arguments it risks the public concluding it’s willing to wreck the economy it seeks to govern.”

    http://business.smh.com.au/business/early-rate-rises-threaten-recovery-20090616-cghe.html?page=-1

  453. 453
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:48 am | Permalink

    Ross Gittins – you can always rely on him to be sensible and informative.

    Wish the silly young journos and TV hosts would take heed of what he says instead of continuing with some of their ridiculous questions.

  454. 454
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25648364-5013871,00.html
    Mal Brough considers a tilt at Higgins

    “I will think about it over the next few days,” he told The Australian.”

    BROUGHYS BACK!

  455. 455
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:55 am | Permalink

    But do the good burghers of Higgins want him, Glen

  456. 456
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25648364-5013871,00.html

    It appears we want someone who can fundraise and those hacks cant do it like Mal can :D

    “While Mr Brough, who lost his Queensland seat in 2007, is from outside the electorate, he is regarded fondly within the Liberal Party for radically changing Australia’s approach to indigenous affairs through the intervention.

    News of the former army officer’s possible candidacy comes as Liberal insiders revealed Mr Costello’s departure would leave a hole in the party’s fundraising capabilities. “

  457. 457
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:00 am | Permalink

    Glen, stop thinking rough Brough is your saviour. You once said the same of Costello. Costello suffered a 1% two-party swing in 2007. Rough Brough suffered a 10.32% two-party swing in 2007, 11.23% if you don’t include the redistribution. His seat was in the top 5 of all 150 seats of highest swings.

    He’s a failure.

  458. 458
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:01 am | Permalink

    SBS is an important channel and community service. When I’ve worked with public housing tenants, a lot of the older ones whose English is not great, the only thing they look forward to each day is the Russian news (for example, where I work) on SBS each day.

    Just because you can’t understand it, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be there (a mantra that Libs country-wide should take note of over several subjects).

  459. 459
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    457 – Bob, Mal’s seat was always going to swing more than an inner-Melbourne seat. If he wants to have a shot at Higgins, good for him. I don’t think that a big swing makes you a failure. Jim Snow was never a failure to me.

  460. 460
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:03 am | Permalink

    bob cry me a river…Brough is Best!

    Viva Mal Brough!
    Viva Liberal Party

  461. 461
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Yep I agree- leave SBS alone. You don’t have to be ethnic to appreciate it.

    SBS news is the only place to get world coverage if you don’t have paytv. And Karen Middleton is fair to midling with her political commentary.

    ABC news is becoming too tabloid.

  462. 462
    centaur009
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:08 am | Permalink

    Who will the ALP put up in higgins?

  463. 463
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    bob cry me a river…Brough is Best!

    Viva Mal Brough!
    Viva Liberal Party

    You said the same of Costello. Brough like Costello appeals heavily to your core constituency but nothing more. This is why you are delusional.

  464. 464
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:09 am | Permalink

    Who will the ALP put up in higgins?

    Like it really matters…

  465. 465
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:11 am | Permalink

    No i didnt bob1234….

  466. 466
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    Brough, like the rest of his mates, will be given plenty of time in opposition to mature.

  467. 467
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Glen, your reputation as PB’s chief VI is increasing.

  468. 468
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    Most likely GB but at least Brough was a talented Minister and is not a Hack unlike 95% of those likely to nominate for Higgins…

  469. 469
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Wellk said GB – but could he hack opposition. He’s a frontend bulldozer and will want Turnbull’s job immediately.

  470. 470
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:21 am | Permalink

    Eric Abetz asks the awkward questions of Bob Brown regarding the Greens scam of the gullible.

    http://www.openaustralia.org/senate/?id=2009-06-16.194.1&s=speaker%3A10003#g194.2

  471. 471
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Brough was Ok but standing out like a beacon among that lot is really not saying much I’m afraid. He wouldn’t make the “second eleven” in today’s Labor Party.

  472. 472
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:23 am | Permalink

    Most likely GB but at least Brough was a talented Minister

    What a pile of rubbish.

  473. 473
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    Bob you are intitled to your opinions…

    GB if you think Brough is not better than Baldwin, Pyne, Dutton, Ciobo, Stone et al then really take a good look at their CVs and compare them to Mal’s :D

    *departs*

  474. 474
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    Gawd Glen – I’m agreeing with you for once. He is better than the mob you mentioned but still needs a ‘modesty’ transplant.

    Saw another one similar to Pyne this a.m. on Sky. What a smug little bloke Briggs is.

    I’m a South Aussie but something has been put in the water since I left. The Libs are appalling types over there now. What is going on.

    I grew up in Tom Playford’s back yard – he would be turning over in his grave to see that mob of pansies.

  475. 475
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:35 am | Permalink

    No 471

    Gary, the only people with mild talent are Gillard, Tanner and Rudd (maybe Combet and Faulkner too). The rest are not really worthy of mention.

  476. 476
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:37 am | Permalink

    Bob you are intitled to your opinions…

    GB if you think Brough is not better than Baldwin, Pyne, Dutton, Ciobo, Stone et al then really take a good look at their CVs and compare them to Mal’s

    I agree Brough is better than those you mentioned, but that only speaks volumes about the shallow pool in the Liberal Party. Those you mentioned are very awful, Brough is simply awful.

  477. 477
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    GB if you think Brough is not better than Baldwin, Pyne, Dutton, Ciobo, Stone et al then really take a good look at their CVs and compare them to Mal’s

    Glen, I do.

    Gary, the only people with mild talent are Gillard, Tanner and Rudd (maybe Combet and Faulkner too). The rest are not really worthy of mention.

    You maybe right but Brough would be standing behind “the rest”.

  478. 478
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    470 – GG, Eric Abetz is to me in the worst half dozen of parliamentarians. He’s an absolute fruitcake.

  479. 479
    Benji
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    Glen,

    Agree about Baldwin. My local member and a complete waste of space. Would rather have Brough than him

  480. 480
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:43 am | Permalink

    Abetz is causing heaps of trouble for the Libs with his comments about Bob Brown.

    It’s not only the Greens who have time for Bob Brown.

  481. 481
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    I still wonder why Glen hasn’t retracted his comments on rough Brough in Longman. 10.32% two-party swing post-redistribution, 11.23% two-party swing pre-redistribution. At the top 5 of 150 electorates with the biggest swings, the electorate came at rough Brough with baseball bats.

  482. 482
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    Bob Brown just missed a vote, which enabled some amendment to pass by 1 vote. Brown has requested a re-vote and Abetz is presently giving him a thorough dressing down over past comments by Brown when a coalition senator missed a vote.

  483. 483
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:46 am | Permalink

    Benji – I sympathise with you mate. He’s my member too and I am embarrassed by him most of the time.

    We have to work harder in 2010 to get rid of him. I’m already saving up for a pair of ubeaut shoes to pound the pavements for whomever Labor puts up against Baldwin.

  484. 484
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:47 am | Permalink

    Was was the bill Triton – dialup so too slow to have it up on computer and I’m not close to the telly.

  485. 485
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:48 am | Permalink

    Sorry Triton – I meant ‘what was the bill’.

  486. 486
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    No 481

    Bob1234 – it was lost in the overall anti-government swing of the election.

  487. 487
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:50 am | Permalink

    phil.

    Nice, thoughtful comment. On this occaission Abetz has exposed Brown’s naked manipulation for what it is.

  488. 488
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Brown missed a division and is now being lectured for hypocrisy.

  489. 489
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    No 482

    And so he should. There was outrage when the Coalition made a similar mistake. Seems like Bob loves his double standards.

  490. 490
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    I said it for you GG.

  491. 491
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:55 am | Permalink

    Glen’s gushing reminds us that Liberals always seem to need a Messiah, a Saviour.

    You see further evidence of this in the way they will not naysay Howard, even though he personally almost wrecked the Party.

    Andrew Elder, newmatilda.com, 26 February 2008:

    Liberals can't criticise Howard because there is no such thing as an anti-Howard Liberal; such was the Party made to serve him that you may as well talk about anti-water fish.

    http://newmatilda.com/2008/02/26/mutineers-howard

    Their propensity to blind adoring hero-worship, while touching, reveals a deeps-seated insecure vacuity.

  492. 492
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:57 am | Permalink

    No 491

    Cuppa, save us the hypocritical invective. The ALP were a bunch of dunderheads before Rudd saved them from another three years of oblivion.

  493. 493
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Psephos – what was the vote for – was it important.

  494. 494
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Cuppa, you could say that about all parties, really.

  495. 495
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:00 am | Permalink

    #484
    If I’ve read the coalition amendments document correctly it’s something about “award modernisation request” for the Fair Work bill. Beats me what it’s about.

    Senators lined up to stick the boot into Brown. McDonald mentioned “sanctimonious hypocrisy” and then Fielding let fly.

  496. 496
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    Phil

    Maybe. Maybe not. Is Rudd seen by Laborites as a demigod? I doubt it. Do Greens fall at the feet of Bob Brown to worship him? Did the Democrats fawn at the toes of Natasha?

  497. 497
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    No 495

    Good on them. It’s nice to give Brown a taste of his own medicine. The guy is perpetually indignant.

  498. 498
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    No 496

    Cuppa, Howard brought the party out of 13 years of oblivion. It is natural that he will command huge respect and authority in the party room. However, that did not preclude a challenge to his leadership. Costello was not willing to damage the unity of the party for his own personal gain.

  499. 499
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:06 am | Permalink

    Triton – thanks – will probably be all over MSM later.

    Bit rich for Fielding to weigh in tho – can’t wait to see the back of him.

  500. 500
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    Bob1234 - it was lost in the overall anti-government swing of the election.

    Top 5 largest swings in 150 divisions.

  501. 501
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:10 am | Permalink

    I also note the Liberal moderates had a very small swing against them or infact a positive swing. ;)

  502. 502
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    One of Brown’s failings is that when he tries to “play tough” he comes across as petty and sanctimonious, so other Senators don’t give him any latitude when he slips up. He brings this on himself. He should stick to the issues on which he has the moral high ground (of which they are many), and not try to play the tough guy.

  503. 503
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    GP,

    Yes, I see that. But Rudd brought Labor out of 11.5 years in the cold, yet he doesn’t appear to be sanctified by Laborites the way Howard is by your mob. Look at Gushing Glen here. Poor guy can hardly contain himself, so ecstatic is he at the prospect of a new Saviour.

    I use terms such as worship, saviour, messiah intentionally. The fervour strikes me as alomst religious-like in its intensity. Rewind the clock a few decades, and this was the mindset that enabled far-right types such as Hitler.

  504. 504
    Benji
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    BH,

    Hopefully redistribution in NSW will see Paterson pickup all of Maitland including Rutherford, as it used to be prior to 2001. That would see the end of Baldwin.

  505. 505
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    The re-vote is tied so the amendment, whatever it was, has been rejected.

    Proceedings are given here if anyone’s interested:
    http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/DynamicRed/

  506. 506
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Maybe. Maybe not. Is Rudd seen by Laborites as a demigod? I doubt it. Do Greens fall at the feet of Bob Brown to worship him? Did the Democrats fawn at the toes of Natasha?

    Rudd is seen pretty highly and would be seen more of a demigod if he had more, well, personality. As for Bob Brown and Tash, yes. It’s natural to focus on a leader, especially a charismatic or strong one. Howard was strong, he was just strong in a way that I disagree with.

  507. 507
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    503 – Give Rudd a while, if he rules for 11 years he’ll be a demigod to Laborites. Howard was downright despised by a lot of Libs after 2 years (gun buy-back)

  508. 508
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:16 am | Permalink

    In more important news Rove and Tasma got married!!! awwwwwwwwwww

    Mal who?

  509. 509
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    And he can say what the and we’ll all have to chuckle politely. Tasma sounds like the name of a car.

  510. 510
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:22 am | Permalink

    No 503

    Cuppa, you do yourself a disservice by using Hitler to expound your argument.

    Glen is not gushing over Brough. He’s merely stating a fact that the party would be better served by someone with his experience and nous than some useless, but loyal, hack.

  511. 511
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:23 am | Permalink

    No 507

    The sensible Liberals, like me, respected Howard for having the courage to toughen up gun laws.

  512. 512
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:24 am | Permalink

    Glen is not gushing over Brough. He’s merely stating a fact that the party would be better served by someone with his experience and nous than some useless, but loyal, hack.

    Nah, he’s gushing :)

  513. 513
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    No 506

    Yes, you’ve hit the nail on the head phil. It’s Rudd’s lack of personality that stands in the way of him being perceived as a demigod. Contrast Rudd with Keating and you’ll know what I mean.

  514. 514
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:25 am | Permalink

    Apparently Glen and Mal had a secret wedding in Broome just after Rove and Tasma….

  515. 515
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:26 am | Permalink

    Dario let’s look at facts…

    ALPers backed Greg Combet to take Charlton over a Hack in Ms Hoar…

    I dont see the difference in supporting Brough over some factional Hack in Higgins…

    I dont regard one person as a saviour of the party but the party would be better of with Mal Brough on our side in Parliament.

  516. 516
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    Lets see, recession likely avoided, Economy best in OECD.
    However ‘Rudd lacks personality’ . Damn him to hell.

  517. 517
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    No 515

    Hear, hear.

  518. 518
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:30 am | Permalink

    No 516

    Egregious debt, hundreds of thousands out of work, nothing to show for it.

  519. 519
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    GP,

    Do you think the GFC is a myth?

  520. 520
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:31 am | Permalink

    The more I read this story, the more I want to throw up.

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25641913-5001021,00.html

  521. 521
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    511 – I assume that you live in the city though GP. I was living in the country when that happened and some people, natural Lib or Nat voters, were very unhappy. It was a brave thing to do.

  522. 522
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:32 am | Permalink

    No 519

    No, but I think silly amounts of debt will not protect us from an inevitable recession.

  523. 523
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    No 521

    They were unhappy, but as I recall (correct me I’m wrong), they could still retain possession of firearms for farm use.

  524. 524
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    520, why? was he your boyfriend too?

  525. 525
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    I understand that the Higgins electorate Conference at the end of July will have a “special guest speaker”

    Mr Andrew Bolt

  526. 526
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    No, but I think silly amounts of debt will not protect us from an inevitable recession.

    Why wouldn’t the stimulus of extra public spending reduce the depth of a recession?

  527. 527
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Mao, I’m not saying that having an interesting personality is a prerequisite for being a good PM, it just helps if you want to be worshipped by your party. For the record I think Rudd is doing a pretty decent job.

  528. 528
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Well GP one thing is for sure we’ll again have to pay off Labor’s debt whenever we win back power…i dont think Rudd and Swan know how to balance the books….

  529. 529
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    #525

    now that is hilarious.

  530. 530
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    No 524

    Mao, no. The thought of a 12-year-old being pregnant is just sickening.

  531. 531
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:36 am | Permalink

    Zombie, ordinary and tasteless. God knows there is enough in GP’s Talking Points to attack him on.

  532. 532
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    530

    Hear, Hear, GP what has this country come to?

  533. 533
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    523 – I’m not totally sure, but I think it limited the number and type of guns that one could have, even for farm use. (no semi-automatics if memory serves, but I’m sure others on this forum have a better knowledge)

  534. 534
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    Dario let’s look at facts…

    That would be a first for you Glen ;-)

  535. 535
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    No 525

    Janet A would have been a better choice.

  536. 536
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:38 am | Permalink

    “Australian Greens Leader Bob Brown says former Minister for Forests, Senator Eric Abetz, should reveal, and pay back, the cost to taxpayers of his use of office to hire barristers for federal intervention in the Wielangta case in the Federal Court.

    Senator Brown said the cost would be huge. The initial court case was against Forestry Tasmania, not the Commonwealth, but in August 2005 the Howard government and state government applied to intervene in the case in support of Forestry Tasmania.

    “Senator Abetz has used parliament to attack my role in defending the Wielangta Forest in the courts, and fund raising to enable this action. But Senator Abetz has an equal and opposite responsibility. Abetz should reveal the totally unnecessary cost to the public of the federal invention on the case which he hosted, and then repay the money – though a public appeal if he wishes,” Senator Brown said.”

    Touche.

  537. 537
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:39 am | Permalink

    #535

    that’s even more hilarious

  538. 538
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:40 am | Permalink

    No 531

    Zombie, ordinary and tasteless.

    Too true, Fulvio. And you would know very well given your past history working with disadvantaged Aboriginal communities in WA.

  539. 539
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    Nothing to show for it ...

    … except for new school buildings, bridges, repaired road black-spots, highway improvements, community halls and facilities, ceiling insulation in homes across the continent … people in employment constructing the above, others in supporting employment, the boost to economic activity in communities from the outback to inner metro areas, the income tax revenue going back to the commonwealth. Nah, nothing to show for it whatsoever!

  540. 540
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:41 am | Permalink

    No 536

    Bob Brown is an idiot, as usual.

  541. 541
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:42 am | Permalink

    GP,

    A peak of 13% of GDP as the debt proportion of GDP is neither egregious nor excessive when compared to major western economies. The Liberal position on this has been debunked by every thinking economist. Repeating your mantra does not make it true. It just makes your position juvenile.

    There’s a reason that Rudd and the Government are so popular. They take good advice and people see them getting on with the job of governing the country in a tough environment.

  542. 542
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:45 am | Permalink

    A peak of 13% of GDP as the debt proportion of GDP is neither egregious nor excessive when compared to major western economies. The Liberal position on this has been debunked by every thinking economist. Repeating your mantra does not make it true. It just makes your position juvenile.

    Most people who have ever had a home loan can spot the pathetic nature of the Libs debt arguments any day

  543. 543
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:46 am | Permalink

    No 541

    Peak debt of 13% is massive compared to ZERO net debt we had previously.

  544. 544
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    No 542

    Government debt is not the same as a home loan. A home owner is responsible for their home loan. Taxpayers are responsible for the debt and the annual multi-billion-dollar interest bill.

  545. 545
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    A someone once pointed out here on Poll Bludger, that’s like a person on a hundred grand taking out a 13,000 dollar loan to build a shed. Hardly the end of the world, except the unconscionable Liberals would try to scare dimwitted voters into believing it.

  546. 546
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:50 am | Permalink

    ZM,

    Reads like more whining from Brown because he is under pressure to be acountable for his dodgy fundraising scam.

  547. 547
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    Iran’s most senior cleric says the election was rigged. This one’s not going to go to bed.

    the country's most senior Islamic cleric threw his weight behind opposition charges that Ahmadinejad's re-election was rigged.

    "No one in their right mind can believe" the official results from Friday's contest, Grand Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri said of the landslide victory claimed by Ahmadinejad. Montazeri accused the regime of handling Mousavi's charges of fraud and the massive protests of his backers "in the worst way possible."

    http://www.mcclatchydc.com/iran/story/70155.html

  548. 548
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    Government debt is not the same as a home loan. A home owner is responsible for their home loan. Taxpayers are responsible for the debt and the annual multi-billion-dollar interest bill.

    No GP, the government is responsible

  549. 549
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    In Canada it is the conservatives in power borrowing to protect their economy against the GFC, while it is the lefites in opposition raising a scare over “the debt”. I guess it’s just what any sensible government has to do, and what oppositions (because they’re oppositions) must oppose.

  550. 550
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Iran’s most senior cleric says the election was rigged. This one’s not going to go to bed.

    Wow, things are getting to revolutionary levels over there now

  551. 551
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:56 am | Permalink

    A someone once pointed out here on Poll Bludger, that’s like a person on a hundred grand taking out a 13,000 dollar loan to build a shed.

    No it’s not. Even allowing for the spurious analogy, the Government’s revenue is not the same as the GDP.

  552. 552
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:11 pm | Permalink

    Benji – I’m at the other end to you. Do you think it is likely to be realigned. Hoping not.

  553. 553
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    No it’s not. Even allowing for the spurious analogy, the Government’s revenue is not the same as the GDP.

    True. Federal Government revenue is around 30% of GDP I think. However, governments get much better interest rates than we do.

  554. 554
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:14 pm | Permalink

    The New Kids on the Block Australian Tour has been cancelled.

    http://www.undercover.com.au/News-Story.aspx?id=8548

    This is a bad thing?

  555. 555
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Dr Phil is definitely coming here tough.

  556. 556
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:16 pm | Permalink

    Dario

    Governments also have much less discretionary spending than we do. If we want, we can tighten our belts and save pretty easily. It’s much harder for Governments to do that. Although I accept that their revenue can also be increased more easily than ours can, unless we rob a bank.

  557. 557
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    Bob Brown is an idiot, as usual.

    #540, it’s your idiot now. As your side has gotten into bed this idiot over the blocking of the Ruddbank Bill. It is obvious now that the Greens and the Liberals are anti jobs.

  558. 558
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    It is obvious now that the Greens and the Liberals are anti jobs

    Anti jobs? I think that this forums average intelligence is above terms like that.

  559. 559
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:27 pm | Permalink

    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-business/economy-has-passed-the-worst-survey-20090617-chbh.html

    The Australian economy appears to be strengthening, with its annual pace of contraction forecast in April not as severe as in previous months, a survey says.

    The Westpac/Melbourne Institute leading index of economic activity rose by 0.7 per cent in April and was down 3.5 per cent over the year, according to the survey released on Wednesday.

    The annualised result follows readings of minus 5.1 per cent in March and minus 6.1 per cent in February.

    But the index, which indicates the likely rate of economic activity three to nine months into the future, remains below the long-term trend growth rate of three per cent.

    Westpac chief economist Bill Evans said the growth rate was a "significant improvement" since February, when the index hit its low point in the current cycle, yet there was more pain for the economy in the months ahead.

    "The February read was the lowest since 1982," Mr Evans said.

    "Its current pace is still consistent with the Australian economy contracting in the June and September quarters, but if this rate of improvement in the growth rate continues we can look to positive growth in the first half of 2010.

    "That profile is broadly consistent with Westpac's own forecasts with the economy contracting by 0.6 per cent in the June quarter and contracting at an annualised pace of around 1.5 per cent in the second half of 2009 before recovering to a growth pace of one per cent in 2010."

  560. 560
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    No 557

    We do not need a Government-owned bank to protect jobs.

  561. 561
    BigBob
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:30 pm | Permalink

    Well, there’s another DD trigger waiting in three months.

  562. 562
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    Odd as its seems, Mia freedman makes an interesting point on the 12 yr old pregnant girl story. I don’t know if I totally agree with her.

    http://mamamia.com.au/weblog/2009/06/a-12-year-old-girl-is-pregnant-why-is-that-docs-fault.html

  563. 563
    Tom
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:31 pm | Permalink

    -Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Permalink
    No 557

    We do not need a Government-owned bank to protect jobs.

    Take out two words – “owned bank” – and you have the true conservative philosophy.

    Tom

  564. 564
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    this forums average intelligence is above terms like that.

    #558, you are obviously new here. i forgive you.

  565. 565
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Actually that would be more of a randian libertarian position Tom.

  566. 566
    evan14
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:34 pm | Permalink

    It’s Generic Person who drags down the collective IQ of this board.

  567. 567
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    Finns

    I’m totally ignorant about the Ruddbank. What is it and why would we want it? You have 100 words.

  568. 568
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    #566, i was just try to be kind to my nappy friend.

  569. 569
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    Finns - I’m totally ignorant about the Ruddbank. What is it and why would we want it? You have 100 words.

    A job for the good boy, Cossssssie.

    There you are the magnificent 7 words. Is that good enough for you Herr Diog?

  570. 570
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:37 pm | Permalink

    I’m totally ignorant about the Ruddbank. What is it and why would we want it? You have 100 words.

    A line of credit from the government to the construction industry, as international funding in Australia has dried up due to the credit crunch

  571. 571
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    well a bit of it is from the government, the rest from the big four banks.

  572. 572
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    #570, you are just too kind.

  573. 573
    vote1maxine
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    GP and other Liberal hacks here continually display their economic illiteracy just like motormouth Hockey. (Cf. my post @ 452, “Ross Gittins slams Hockey)

  574. 574
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    Dio

    Construction finance is often a big issue for major projects. If you are building a billion dollar freeway or shopping centre and only get paid in stages, you may hold up to $200 M in debt at times, and need to borrow that money to pay the workers to finish the project, at which time you pay back your debtors and hopefully make a profit with the change. So most building contractors have substantial lines of credit. If banks close up credit lines then RuddBank is needed to prevent that closure stopping other activity.

    Liberal economic vandalism will always be higher under Labor.

  575. 575
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    Heard that the Property Council (Commercial construction mob) begged, pleased and went on bended knees to Bishop, Hockey & Turnbull to get the Ruddbank passed.

    No go, said the Libs – so that means the Libs will not be able to go cap in hand for funds for the next election to the construction mob.

    The funds were only going to be available to certain firms on the approval of the 4 Big Banks so deadbeat builders would not be eligible.

    It was to make sure that commercial building sites could go on during the credit crunch.

  576. 576
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:44 pm | Permalink

    I love how Greensborough Growler has the plumb the depths of the Liberal Party (bloody Abetz! lol) to find someone to support his position.

    well a bit of it is from the government, the rest from the big four banks.

    Half-half, no?

    The Liberals werne’t going to vote anyway, The Greens wanted the salaries of executives of companies benefitting from billions of taxpyayers dollars to be capped at the tiny figure of $1 million.

    Does anyone think that companies being aided by the taxpayer should be able to pay their executives whatever they want?

    Actually, to rephrase: If Kevin Rudd was to back up his statements that executive salaries were “obscene” by capping the pay of executives who are taking advantage of taxpayers money, would anyone here disagree?

  577. 577
    Benji
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    BH,

    ALP submission has Paterson covering Maitland, taking out Gloucester while the LP submission adds Muswellbrook, Singleton and Mudgee, while taking out Nelson Bay, Raymond Terrace and Maitland!!!

  578. 578
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    I also don’t see the problem with that other proposed ammendment to ensure half of the board was government appointed to reflect the nature of the funding. Not sure if this got up though.

  579. 579
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    #574, you are the kindest.

    You see Herr Diog, all i have to do is sit and ponder under the Knowledge Tree and the apples will fall just as predicted by Newton.

  580. 580
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Benji – does that mean that Forster will go into Lyne?

  581. 581
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:49 pm | Permalink

    No 579

    Only the low-hanging rotten apples, of course.

  582. 582
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:53 pm | Permalink

    No 562

    She has a point about blaming DOCS. It is inevitable that they will prioritise more severe cases.

    My point was that it is a sad day in this world when a pre-pubescent child becomes pregnant due to parental neglect.

  583. 583
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    GP 581

    Thanks for that. How many construction projects have you managed the finance of?

  584. 584
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:54 pm | Permalink

    It’s Generic Person who drags down the collective IQ of this board

    They don’t believe in collectives. It’s every man for himself and bugger the rest of yas!

  585. 585
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    No 583

    My extended family is involved in commercial and residential construction and they’re sources of funding a reasonably secure.

  586. 586
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:56 pm | Permalink

    No 585

    they’re = their

  587. 587
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    No 584

    Collectives give rise to groupthink. Who would want that?

  588. 588
    Benji
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:58 pm | Permalink

    BH,

    No. ALP proposes Gloucester LGA and Bulahdelah move to Lyne. Tuncurry and Foster would stay in Paterson on community of interest grounds.

    But the committee may do something completely different, like they did in 2006.

  589. 589
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    My extended family is involved in commercial and residential construction and they’re sources of funding a reasonably secure.

    Is it coming from Napoli?

    Zing.

    Don’t tell Frank, he won’t get the joke and think I’m slandering all Italians.

  590. 590
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:00 pm | Permalink

    No 589

    LOL

  591. 591
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    No 585

    Another silly mistake

    a reasonably secure = are reasonably secure

  592. 592
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:01 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for that. How many construction projects have you managed the finance of?

    Soc, well asked. If i recall, i also asked GP once as to how many startups has he done. Obviously, none. He’s still in nappy.

  593. 593
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Is it coming from Napoli?

    #589 – That’s Amore

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aS6-b7CONDI

  594. 594
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:03 pm | Permalink

    Collective activity is what transformed Australia from a wild and rough island into one with roads, schools, hospitals. Collective activity makes a defence force possible, enables a society and community spirit. Yes, it’s truly evil stuff.

  595. 595
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:04 pm | Permalink

    No 592

    Finns, the Government doesn’t do anything to support jobs. People, like those in my family, who run SMEs are the ones who take the risk, take a chance and create jobs.

  596. 596
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:06 pm | Permalink

    People, like those in my family, who run SMEs are the ones who take the risk, take a chance and create jobs.

    My salute to your family. We are in the same boat.

    But what I want to know is YOU. What risks have you taken to create job and business?

  597. 597
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:07 pm | Permalink

    So the stimulus doesn’t support jobs?

  598. 598
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:09 pm | Permalink

    Regarding Ruddbank, I agree with teh greens idea to limit executive salary levels, which I have expressed concern about many times. However they should not have voted against the bill if they couldn’t get that. This this was not the US govt bailing out failed banks.

    Ruddbank is aimed at loaning working capital to otherwise viable projects that are being denied construction finance. As long as the project is based on a binding contract with a buyer at the end of it that should be fine, and the taxpayer can expect to see their money back with low risk and some interest paid. Meanwhile thousands of people don’t lose their jobs. As long as the loans are publicly listed so no secret slush fund is developed, I see no problem with Ruddbank at all.

  599. 599
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:10 pm | Permalink

    No 596

    But what I want to know is YOU. What risks have you taken to create job and business?

    I’m still studying. But I’ve been intimately involved in family business since I was a child.

    You’re the last person I need a lecture from about risk.

  600. 600
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    You can almost say the Big 4 are now the Ruddbank because the Govt guarantees their borrowing with the Govt credit rating. So another guarantee to the construction is nothing different, it is just another form. i dont see why people got so excited about it.

  601. 601
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:13 pm | Permalink

    Thanks to everyone but Finns for the Ruddbank explanation. :evil:

  602. 602
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    I’m still studying. But I’ve been intimately involved in family business since I was a child.

    #599, you just make sure you pass the exams and be nice to your Mum.

  603. 603
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    You can almost say the Big 4 are now the Ruddbank because the Govt guarantees their borrowing with the Govt credit rating. So another guarantee to the construction is nothing different, it is just another form. i dont see why people got so excited about it.

    This is a good point.

  604. 604
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:15 pm | Permalink

    Diog, you dont think any explanation from me. i know you too well.

  605. 605
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:16 pm | Permalink

    you dont think = you dont need

  606. 606
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    No 598

    I would like to see evidence that there is a need for the Government to give these banks more money and more guarantees. They haven’t.

    These banks are practically the most profitable in the developed world at the moment. They do not require additional assistance over and above what has already been given.

  607. 607
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    No 602

    You’re also the last person I need patronising from.

  608. 608
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    #607, yes you do, especially be nice to your Mum. :wink:

  609. 609
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:24 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    It must be wonderful to live in a cocoon. I regularly post links to people and groups that I don’t always agree with but who make a relevant point on a particular issue. Abetz is a case in point.

    However, as always with the Greens, you play the man when the criticism is too hot to handle. Brown and his Greens cheer squad should address the substance of Abetz points rather than resorting to mindless abuse.

  610. 610
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    GP 606

    You missed the point. Ruddbank loans money to companies for specific projects, not to banks. Don’t forget to read the exam question.

  611. 611
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    No 610
    .
    And there is even less evidence that we need that.

  612. 612
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    However, as always with the Greens, you play the man when the criticism is too hot to handle

    When it comes to likes of Eric Abetz, I will gladly “play the man”.

  613. 613
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Further humiliation for MHS in SA.

    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25648147-5006301,00.html?from=public_rss

  614. 614
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    Watching a repeat of Lateline….Leigh looked saucy last night. :)

  615. 615
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    #615, focus on youur exams. she tried too hard to look like Juanita Phillips.

  616. 616
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:48 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    So you agree with Abetz?

    “The fact is Senator Brown’s legal challenge lost not on a technicality but on the law. Remember the law? It is what everyone else has to abide by unless, it seems, they are a Green crusader”.

  617. 617
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    No 615

    Juanita can look stunning when she doesn’t where here nanna outfits. :)

  618. 618
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    No 617

    where = wear. Stupid automatic spell checker.

  619. 619
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Here = her 617

  620. 620
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    #619, they should put the Member for Bass back to where she belongs, behind the PM. It’s just not the same without those soulful eyes during QT.

  621. 621
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    This should get the old Labor vs. Greens thing fired up.

    http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/17/rundle-forget-the-alp-time-for-a-greensunions-unholy-alliance/

    Whether the building union leaders themselves have the long view and a willingness to get over their own frequent despite of the Greens (with exceptions) remains to be seen. But the Greens are the only major-minor party who have unequivocally stood against these laws. In that respect they are the Labour party. And it’s time the unions in question recognised it.

  622. 622
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    No 621

    Is Guy Rundle a supporter of corrupt and violent union behaviour? What a surprise.

  623. 623
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:02 pm | Permalink

    “The fact is Senator Brown’s legal challenge lost not on a technicality but on the law. Remember the law? It is what everyone else has to abide by unless, it seems, they are a Green crusader”.

    Sigh. Can you point out anyone here who said Brown is above the law? No, because no one has.

    What’s been pointed out to you, several times, is that Brown actually won the case *on the law*. Your precious Abetz’s lord and saviour John Howard changed *the law*, and a result Brown lost on appeal. This is within *the law*, even though I personally find it objectionable, but I still believe that since this is *the law* and Brown knew it was *the law* he should pay.

  624. 624
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Is Guy Rundle a supporter of corrupt and violent union behaviour? What a surprise.

    Sad that supporting the principle of “everybody is equal under the law” is now being equated to supporting violent crime.

    Sadder still that the same argument being pushed by the Liberals is also being pushed by Rudd and Gillard.

    Ah well, the unions shouldn’t complain. Labor is better, on aggregrate, than the Liberals.

  625. 625
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Anybody mentions HIH???

  626. 626
    polyquats
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    My point was that it is a sad day in this world when a pre-pubescent child becomes pregnant due to parental neglect.

    She’s pregnant, GP, so she can hardly be pre-pubescent.

  627. 627
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    No 624

    Oz, the High Court itself has recognised that there is no such principle.

  628. 628
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:13 pm | Permalink

    Oz, the High Court itself has recognised that there is no such principle.

    I didn’t say it was a law, or an enshrined right.

    A principle is distinct from those, in my opinion.

  629. 629
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Murray Wilcox QC said the following on the matter of compulsory interrogation:

    1.20 The most contentious issue in my consultations was whether the new legislation should contain a power, similar to that granted to the ABCC by section 52 of the BCII Act, enabling the BCD to require a person to answer questions relevant to an investigation. On each side of this debate, opinions were strongly held.

    1.21 Opponents of the power argued it violated the human rights of those who were summoned to testify. They spoke of the right of silence that applies, even in relation to most criminal accusations. They argued it was iniquitous, and discriminatory, to expose workers in a particular industry to a procedure that did not apply to others. The opponents acknowledged there were other statutes providing for compulsory interrogation, but argued these statutes were concerned with suspected behaviour far more significant than unlawful (not even criminal) workplace conduct.

    1.22 Supporters of the power pointed to the protections conferred by sections 53 and 54 of the BCII Act which, they accepted, would be repeated in any new legislation; especially protection against the person’s evidence, or anything derived from it, being used against that person in any later proceeding. Primarily, however, they put a pragmatic argument: such is the code of silence in the building and construction
    industry that, without the power of compulsory interrogation, the BCD would be gravely handicapped in its investigations of suspected contraventions; the rule of law in the industry would be defeated; there would be an increase in lawless and disruptive behaviour, with consequential loss of working time and production.

    1.23 It is understandable that workers in the building industry resent being subjected to an interrogation process, that does not apply to other workers, designed to extract from them information for use in penalty proceedings against their workmates and/or union. I sympathise with that feeling and would gladly recommend against grant of the power. However, that would not be a responsible course. I am satisfied there is still such a level of industrial unlawfulness in the building and construction industry, especially in Victoria and Western Australia, that it would be inadvisable not to empower the BCD to undertake compulsory interrogation. The reality is that, without such a power, some types of contravention would be almost impossible to prove.

    Oz, do you agree or disagree with the independent judgment of Wilcox?

    http://www.workplace.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/0B44B3D3-9ABD-4F4A-94FE-866F9ACDB2A6/0/WilcoxReport.pdf

  630. 630
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Careful Oz, “principle” is a four letter word to some Liberals. Then again, so are “Rudd” and “Swan” ;)

  631. 631
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:17 pm | Permalink

    “She’s pregnant, GP, so she can hardly be pre-pubescent.”

    ROTFL thanks Polyquats, I missed that one! GP let me guess, you are studying law, not medicine?

  632. 632
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Regarding Ruddbank, I agree with teh greens idea to limit executive salary levels, which I have expressed concern about many times. However they should not have voted against the bill if they couldn’t get that. This this was not the US govt bailing out failed banks.

    Indeed. These are not handouts, they are loans.

  633. 633
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:24 pm | Permalink

    Last night Glen posted (at 370) a list which he described as “Turnbull reshuffle”. I assumed that he was reporting an actual announcement by Turnbull. Yet there is nothing about any reshuffle in today’s news. He said that Coonan had been dropped from the frontbench, yet two hours ago she was still shadow minister for finance. Where did Glen get this list from? Did he make it up?

  634. 634
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Of course I did Adam as if I am a Liberal insider… :D

    I merely made up a list of who should be in and who should be out and apologies for not making that clear Adam and for forgetting some portfolios…

    :D

  635. 635
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    LOL Adam.

    That was a hypothetical list put forward by Glen, based on what he wanted.

    I thought everyone figured that ou.

  636. 636
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    *out.

  637. 637
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Hahahaha, didn’t send you off on a wild goose chase did he Adam? ;-)

  638. 638
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    How many SMEs in a Shopping Mall that, potentially, have been destroyed by the rejection of the Ruddbank Bill?

  639. 639
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    #636
    Too bad too. The member for Dickson livens up the place. And he won’t be there to receive any barbs that Roxon might have in store later.

  640. 640
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:31 pm | Permalink

    Where did Glen get this list from? Did he make it up?

    oh dear.

  641. 641
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    No 638

    None. Ruddbank is an obscene waste of money. In fact, the terms of the agreement and what it is supposed to solve are so vague as to be a joke.

  642. 642
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Glen. I guess I should know better than to believe anything I read here. I thought by the way it was quite a good reshuffle – I hope some real Lib insiders were reading.

  643. 643
    Tom
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:32 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 1:49 pm | Permalink
    No 617

    where = wear. Stupid automatic spell checker.

    Both ‘wear’ and ‘where’ are correctly spelt. More a case of the stupid poster than the spell check. You’ll lose marks in the exam for that. :) Well, you would if I was marking…

    Tom

  644. 644
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    No 631

    Ok, I’m not a doctor, never have proclaimed that I am one. But at 11 years of age, the reproductive system is barely developed. Now that she’s pregnant, obviously the body can change quickly.

    In any event, she’s still a bloody child that should not be opening her legs and bearing children.

  645. 645
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    Thanks Adam now if only i could get that list to Malcolm T???

  646. 646
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:36 pm | Permalink

    Malcolm is getting a hard time in QT over his past activities.

  647. 647
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Let me guess the ‘rain man’?

    You’d think he’d be going for broke now that he’s got nobody behind him with a knife and coming off one ‘good’ poll…

  648. 648
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:38 pm | Permalink

    Craig Thompson, member for call girls, asks a dorothy dixer. :)

  649. 649
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    Question Time: Apparently Mission Australia is a shadowy ALP front. The Libs have lost it, If they ever had it.

  650. 650
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:39 pm | Permalink

    No, it was about a company of which he was chairman engaged in illegal predatory logging in the Solomons.

  651. 651
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:43 pm | Permalink

    Tanner is an embarrassment Today.

  652. 652
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:44 pm | Permalink

    Myer CEO:

    Mr Brookes says the stronger than expected performance has been assisted by the second round of Federal Government stimulus payments.

    “We have also observed a greater impact from the second Federal Government stimulus package, particularly in many of our suburban and regional stores,” he said.

  653. 653
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Tanner is an embarrassment Today

    He certainly embarrassed you lot

  654. 654
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    No 652

    If the Government wanted to bail out Myer and Harvey Norman, he should have directed the billions directly into their bank accounts.

  655. 655
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    #654
    No, that wouldn’t have supported jobs.

  656. 656
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    I’m waiting for the Gillard Question. The DPM is looking particularly carnivorous today.

  657. 657
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    No 655

    It would have supported jobs at Harvey Norman and Myer. That’s effectively what you’re arguing whenever you quote comments from their directors. It’s the Myer Stimulus Package, at the cost of $23 billion to Australian taxpayers.

  658. 658
    bob1234
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:50 pm | Permalink

    It’s because Liberals don’t understand why economic stimulus works that makes them completely irrelevant in what to do in tough economic times. GP, Glen, all Liberals including MPs are hopeless when it comes to this.

  659. 659
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    It would have supported jobs at Harvey Norman and Myer

    No it wouldn’t GP. You have no idea what you are talking about.

  660. 660
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:52 pm | Permalink

    No 659

    Why not?

  661. 661
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:53 pm | Permalink

    “Why has the Member for Flinders been neutered?”, asks Rudd. I was wondering that, too.

  662. 662
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:55 pm | Permalink

    #657
    Businesses such as Myer and Harvey Norman typically make their money by selling goods, which requires staff. If they instead made their money by having the government pay them directly then the staff become redundant. Of course, they could receive free money _and_ sell goods, but without the stimulus payments to people who spend them at those businesses, staff would probably have to be cut.

  663. 663
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    Why not?

    Because business operates on supply and demand. If consumer demand falls, business will cut jobs to match, even if you give them a handout. They’ll just pocket the money and pay off debt.

  664. 664
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    It’s the Julia v Christopher show, a daily event at 3pm on sitting days

  665. 665
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    More like the Julia mauling Christopher show.

  666. 666
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:01 pm | Permalink

    Bring back the doberman. Pyne’s imbecility is an embarrassment.

  667. 667
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:02 pm | Permalink

    Combet, the blackmailer, is up on the dispatch box. Snooze time.

  668. 668
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:05 pm | Permalink

    http://www.news.com.au/business/story/0,27753,25649832-31037,00.html

    THE superannuation industry is doing away with commissions and moving to a fee-based system that will reduce costs to consumers, and aim to increase competition.

    Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) CEO Richard Gilbert today announced a new consumer charter for fund members, saying it was a major event for the industry and would instil confidence in the market.

    He said by mid-2010 the super industry would be moving towards a fee-based system and away from one in which advisers received a commission.

    "We are going to restructure ourselves so that consumers can see what they are paying for when they are getting advice, and how they match that payment with the value they get for advice," Mr Gilbert told reporters in Canberra.

  669. 669
    BH
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    GP – what are you doing? You are blogging almost day and night.

    My grandkids (who are at Uni and probably your age) don’t have time to do that with all the study they are coping with to get good results. Plus they work part-time for a bit of extra money and independence from their parents.

    You need to smarten up a bit.

  670. 670
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:16 pm | Permalink

    GP #644

    A 12-year old is so underdeveloped that the doctors involved will have consdered the question of a termination

  671. 671
    ltep
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    A 12-year old is so underdeveloped that the doctors involved will have consdered the question of a termination

    The humanity!

  672. 672
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:21 pm | Permalink

    Why not?

    It’s called the freaking multiplier effect. Read an economics book.

  673. 673
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:25 pm | Permalink

    My favourite Daily Tele comment on the matter:

    These bl**dy kids. All they do is screw around and then bludge off MY TAX DOLLARS for the rest of their life. Anyone who has a kid under 18 shouldn't be allowed to get any Government help. They got themselves knocked up. They can deal with it!

    So very Tele. Always about the tax dollars.

  674. 674
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    So very Tele. Always about the tax dollars.

    I love the concept that an 11 year old is devious enough to get preggers in order to steal tax money!

  675. 675
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:33 pm | Permalink

    No 672

    The multiplier effect of the Government’s measures is 0.6. A lot of bloody debt for a piddling multiplier.

  676. 676
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    No 670

    Frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t recommend termination. Well, if they did, it certainly hasn’t been publicised to my knowledge.

  677. 677
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:35 pm | Permalink

    No 669

    BH, thanks for your concern, but I’m fine.

  678. 678
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    The multiplier effect of the Government’s measures is 0.6. A lot of bloody debt for a piddling multiplier

    GP, what portion of the debt in terms of % of GDP is stimulus handouts?

  679. 679
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    No 678

    Government Revenue does not equal Gross Domestic Product.

  680. 680
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    Frankly, I’m surprised they didn’t recommend termination. Well, if they did, it certainly hasn’t been publicised to my knowledge.

    I think the main risk for a girl that age is an underdeveloped pelvic bone structure, which is not a factor if a C-section is available (which it would be)

  681. 681
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Government Revenue does not equal Gross Domestic Product

    Pick a measurement you want and give us the answer then

  682. 682
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    No 680

    Even more sickening that the girl will require a Caesarian.

  683. 683
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    Even more sickening that the girl will require a Caesarian

    You’d be surprised GP. They are pretty common these days.

  684. 684
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:47 pm | Permalink

    There are lots of inceased risks to a 12 yo who is pregnant. Placental abnormalities, pre-eclempsia and low birth weight baby are the main ones. She may well need a Caesarian section but the baby will probably be small so she might not. She (and her parents) would have had those risks explained and they would have made the decision not to have a termination.

  685. 685
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    No 683

    I know they’re common for adult pregnancies. It’s just shocking that a child would need to go through the ordeal.

  686. 686
    triton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    Tony Abbott is being so nice lately. Nice to Julia Gillard, nice to Jenny Macklin, and last night he was saying nice things in parliament about the budget measure to raise the retirement age.

  687. 687
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    I know they’re common for adult pregnancies. It’s just shocking that a child would need to go through the ordeal

    Some might say the ordeal of a caesar is actually less, especially with a posterior birth

  688. 688
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    I imagine Abbott has had it drummed into him that if he wants to be a leadership contender – which on the basis of his experience he ought to be – he has to overcome his reputation as Mr Can’t Cope With Women, who have had the vote for quite some time now.

  689. 689
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Or maybe Abbot is angling for a government job when he quits Parliament, a la Costello, and realizes he’ll be well past retirement age (or dead of old age) if he waits for his lot to get back in.

  690. 690
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    I think that’s less likely.

  691. 691
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    At least Abbott has a Bachelor of Economics – maybe that is why he is not in an shadow economic portfolio?

  692. 692
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    What’s less likely, that he wants the job, that the Libs will be a long time out of office, or that he still has aspirations of taking the leadership? :)

  693. 693
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Abbott said yesterday that he still has leadership aspirations – why would he say that?

  694. 694
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    Curses, I’m wrong again!

  695. 695
    Ozymandias
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    My local member -Keenan- is a bumbling drone. Didn’t Glen and/or GP promote him as young Liberal talent? God help them!

  696. 696
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    The only two places in Aust that Abbott could win a vote is Warringah and the Melbourne Club. No woman away from the north shore would ever vote for him.

  697. 697
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I think it’s unlikely that he want a job from Rudd if he leaves politics. (I also think it’s unlikely that Costello will get one, but who knows?)

    I’m sure Abbott still sees himself as a future leader, and in some ways he’s entitled to. He’s only 51, he has held senior portfolios, he speaks well, he has genuine convictions. His problem is that he comes across as a deeply unlikeable person – arrogant, rude, vicious and insensitive, particularly when dealing with powerful women like Gillard or Roxon, which he obviously has some kind of problem with. If he has been taking advice since the election, he will have been told that this is his most fundamental problem and he has to deal with it.

  698. 698
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:33 pm | Permalink

    Psephos,

    He’s also erratic. One day he’s lecturing one and all about making Parliament and public life more kind. The next he resorts to bastardy and barbs to exploit a perceived political advantage.

    His policy wins as a Minister were rare. He was really just Howard’s bovver boy. He’s made the careers of Gillard, Roxon and Macklin because of his inability to deal with assertive women.

  699. 699
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, too much baggage I think

  700. 700
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:39 pm | Permalink

    Ozymandias, my local member is Jensen.

    At least you have the possibility your bumbler may lose his seat at the next election.

    I am reduced to having to rely on his own Party branch disendorsing him again in favour of another CC denialist.

  701. 701
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    FMD

    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-national/minutes-spent-on-one-second-debate-20090617-chmu.html

    The Senate is facing a huge workload ahead of the winter break, but senators have found the time for a passionate debate about one second.

    There's a long list of bills to deal with before parliament breaks at the end of next week and the government wants the Senate to get cracking.

    But senators spent valuable time arguing about what should happen in the one second remaining on the clock during a minister's answer in question time on Wednesday.

    The clock was stopped because a point of order was called by Liberal senator Mitch Fifield.

    Five senators spoke on the topic of the final second, taking up more than two minutes of the Senate's time.

    "To call a point of order with one second to go ... actually indicates that (Senator Fifield) has lost the plot," said Chris Evans, the government's leader in the Senate.

    Eventually the speaker was given the final second back, in which he managed to cram three words.

  702. 702
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    ...arrogant, rude, vicious and insensitive...

    All prerequisites for a rabble leader. ;)

  703. 703
    philofsydney
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    How long has the ABC been advertising? First on buses and now on crikey banners?

  704. 704
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    No 701

    Anything which gives the Australian people an extra second of relief from Chris Evans is good policy in my view. :)

  705. 705
    jonb2
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:04 pm | Permalink

    Harking back to the Tas State election 06 here’s the first 3 minutes of The Greens Putt’s 45 minute diatribe. http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/200603/r78714_225488.mp3

    Now that’s politics raw style!

  706. 706
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Sense and sensibility:

    http://www.smh.com.au/national/gangland-widow-judy-moran-is-refused-bail-20090617-chhd.html

  707. 707
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:11 pm | Permalink

    No wonder Generic Heffalump is having trouble finding employment.

    A new study has found job seekers with ethnic names are less likely to be considered for positions than those with Anglo-Saxon names.

    Researchers at the Australian National University sent out more than 4,000 fake applications to employers, all containing the same qualifications but different names.

    They found those with Anglo-Saxon names received more calls than those with Indigenous, Chinese, Middle Eastern or Italian names.

    ANU economist Professor Andrew Leigh says it is not clear whether employers were being deliberately racist.

    "It could be that a very small share of employers are behaving very badly," he said.

    "Or possibly, a large share of employers are just subconsciously making the mistake of choosing the less qualified Anglo candidate over the more qualified Chinese candidate."

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/17/2601052.htm?section=justin

  708. 708
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    HuffPo has done a great job covering the Iranian election, although William tells me I’m silly for reading it. The Assembly of Experts have called an emergency meeting. They have the power to remove Khameni but the reason for the meeting is unknown.

    Some of my sources in Iran have told me that Ayatollah Rafsanjani, who is the head of the Assembly of Experts -- the eighty-six member clerical body that decides who will be the next Supreme Leader, and is, by the way, the only group that is empowered to remove the Supreme Leader from power -- that they have issued an emergency meeting in Qom.

    Now, Anderson, I have to tell you, there's only one reason for the Assembly of Experts to meet at this point, and that is to actually talk about what to do about Khamenei. So, this is what I'm saying, is that we're talking about the very legitimacy, the very foundation of the Islamic Republic is up in the air right now. It's hard to say what this is going to go.

  709. 709
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    There wa a shift in Govt. tactics today. They are going after Turnbull – Rudd said something about HIH and hinted that he was leaving that for later.

    Tony Bourke gets a question about Silvania Forest Products. The gloves are off.

  710. 710
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    Surely the statute of limitations is up on the HIH thing.

  711. 711
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Surely the statute of limitations is up on the HIH thing.

    It may still be back in the courts next year, the out of court settlement is not a done deal.

  712. 712
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:40 pm | Permalink

    They are going after Turnbull

    About time! The claim is always made about Kevin Rudd, but Turnbull’s the guy who’s had a dream run, from the government and the media.

  713. 713
    Just Me
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    Abbott is out of the genuine leadership stakes, and was never seriously in it.

    He does not have sufficient support in the broader community, never has, and never will.

  714. 714
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:42 pm | Permalink

    No 712

    No adverse findings were ever made against Turnbull. Rudd just wants his share of the blood after Fitzgibbon’s slaying.

  715. 715
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull’s the guy who’s had a dream run, from the government and the media

    You’re not wrong

  716. 716
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:43 pm | Permalink

    No 713

    Similar things were said of John Howard 20 years ago until he led his party to 4 election victories.

  717. 717
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:44 pm | Permalink

    Cuppa

    I would expect a headline in the Australin tomorrow saying “Turnbull made $25 million clear felling Solomon Island.”

    Won’t hold my breath. ;)

  718. 718
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    Ru, Dario,

    Their ABC had a hagiography corner devoted to their man on the front page of ABC News Online on 9 June. The heading read:

    Stop at nothing

    Then, along with a photograph, the text read:

    Malcolm Turnbull has been described as 'the kind of Prime Minister you'd want Australia to have'.

    Groan. The bias could not have been any more blatant.

  719. 719
    evan14
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:50 pm | Permalink

    QT would be far more boring without the daily inanity from Dutton, the Member for Dickson. How on earth this tool continues to stay on the Liberal front bench is beyond me!

  720. 720
    evan14
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:52 pm | Permalink

    Yes, Tony Burke tipped a nice fat bucket on Malcopops today, Generic Person would have hated it.

  721. 721
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    Dutton is the lowlife who called the Prime Minister “the pig of Australian politics”. This coming from an ex-copper, and member of the party that worships someone even they refer to as a rodent.

  722. 722
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:53 pm | Permalink

    No 718

    Cuppa, I struggle to see any bias in what you’ve just quoted. If Malcolm Turnbull has indeed been described as such, and the ABC has merely reported it, then there is no bias.

    Just front up and admit that you want the ABC to be a Government mouthpiece.

  723. 723
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    No 720

    Tony Burke is another Labor dunce.

  724. 724
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 5:55 pm | Permalink

    No 721

    Rudd has been a toxic, feral boar since forever. :)

  725. 725
    evan14
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:00 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person: compare Dutton with Bruce Bilson(a gentleman). Bilson asked Gillard a decent question today, without all the sneering of Pyne/Hockey/Dutton.
    The member for Dunkley is one from your side who I respect.

  726. 726
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:08 pm | Permalink

    I don’t follow the Parliamentary broacasts much, but if a genuine question is asked by the other side, no matter who’s in Government, is it generally answered properly in question time, or is it always an opportunity for one up manship?

    Seriously, over the last 40 odd years, whenever I have heard snippets from QT, the answers have always been very funny or infuriating, depending on who’s in power, but very seldom informative.

  727. 727
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    When the media was paying out … and paying out … on Rudd for berating a member of the Defence Force aboard a plane, little was made of this:

    http://www.2ue.com.au/the-rise-and-rise-of-the-combative-malcolm-turnbull/20080916-4hej.html?page=single

    Radio 2UE, 16 September 2008

    {Turnbull} he's impatient ... He's a bully - fellow republican campaigner Tim Costello recalls: "When you're on the wrong end of Malcolm it's terrifying, the thunder in the face and ... the tongue lashing."

    When are they going to go after the Liberal guy for the same thing they crucified Rudd for??

  728. 728
    Fielding
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:09 pm | Permalink

    Let’em go after Malcolm. It’ll just feed in to the perception out there that Rudd is a nasty little grub and not at all the kind of person the electorate thought it was voting in as PM.

  729. 729
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    No 727

    Problem is Cuppa, Turnbull doesn’t tell off public servants for bringing him red meat instead of white meat. He isn’t that vacuous.

  730. 730
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:12 pm | Permalink

    To be fair to the ABC

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/17/2601116.htm

    “Turnbull under fire in dramatic Question Time”.

    ...Prime Minister Kevin Rudd alluded to his dealings with collapsed insurer HIH in its takeover of FAI.

    "We'll be coming on to HIH fairly soon, because I know the Leader of the Opposition had a particular interest in that matter," he said.

    To be conttinued… :)

  731. 731
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:19 pm | Permalink

    Much was made by the media of the Liberal Party’s talking point about Mr Rudd using someone’s secondhand old ute. So I’m wondering why this is or was not a major story …

    The Age, 24 February 2009

    http://www.theage.com.au/national/police-reopen-visa-probe-20090223-8fvf.html?page=-1

    Police reopen visa probe

    The Australian Federal Police has launched a fresh investigation into cash-for-visa allegations involving the Liberal Party and alleged Mafia figures.

  732. 732
    Dario
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:22 pm | Permalink

    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-world/obama-set-to-unveil-financial-supervision-reforms-20090617-chqf.html

    US President Barack Obama is set to propose wide reforms that will see the Federal Reserve gain broad powers and a national bank supervisor created to avoid a repeat of the financial turmoil.

    It will be the first major bid to overhaul the highly complex US financial regulatory network since a home mortgage meltdown shook the core of the system and sent markets into a tailspin worldwide.

    "We're going to make sure that we've got a systemic regulator, somebody who can oversee the entire system and, when you start seeing the kinds of risks that we saw being taken in this last crisis, that we can catch it before the crisis occurs," Obama told Bloomberg Television.

    Officials told a media briefing that Obama would propose a Financial Services Oversight Council led by the Treasury Department to oversee supervision of the financial system.

    The plan is also to make the Federal Reserve the centralized supervisor of large banks and other key financial institutions, officials said.

    The Office of Thrift Supervision -- a federal bank regulator and supervisor -- will be abolished under the reform proposals, the officials said.

  733. 733
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:25 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull doesn’t tell off public servants for bringing him red meat instead of white meat

    Turnbull of the Terrifying Temper would have just done the Liberal thing: had the hapless employee dismissed on the spot without recourse. Liberals call it Work”Choices”.

  734. 734
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:29 pm | Permalink

    No 730

    Obviously those investigations have not revealed anything material otherwise heads would be rolling.

    Cuppa, you can bring up any amount of old newspaper articles, you can even talk about Sir Henry Parkes and the prophet Moses, but it simply won’t change the reality of Rudd’s piggish behaviour.

  735. 735
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

    No 732

    The terrifying temper you speak of is mythical conjecture.

  736. 736
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:31 pm | Permalink

    Cuppa, you can bring up any amount of old newspaper articles, you can even talk about Sir Henry Parkes and the prophet Moses, but it simply won’t change the reality of Rudd’s piggish behaviour.

    Says the Generic Heffalump who says at various times”

    Rudd has been a toxic, feral boar since forever.

  737. 737
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:36 pm | Permalink

    Does anyone else think Turnbull bears a striking resemblance to a photo shopped Montgomery Burns?

  738. 738
    It's Time
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:37 pm | Permalink

    No 732

    The terrifying temper you speak of is mythical conjecture.

    So GP, you have evidence to support this? Make sure that it is more reliable and trustworthy than the material linked at #727. Or is this just your uninformed opinion?

  739. 739
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    Does anyone else think Turnbull bears a striking resemblance to a photo shopped Montgomery Burns?

    “Excellent” :-)

    An example :-)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JmylSHuPvg

  740. 740
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    The terrifying temper you speak of is mythical conjecture.

    ... Peter Costello's brother Tim, who worked with Mr Turnbull during the Republican campaign, said "... when you're on the wrong end of Malcolm it's terrifying, the thunder in the face and often the quite spontaneous, even over the top tongue lashing,” Tim Costello says.

    "There was irritation, there was annoyance, there was `if you just shut up and listen to me you'll understand why I'm right and you're completely wrong'.”

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24237106-601,00.html

    Described by a victim as literally “terrifying”, it is definitely piggish and boorish behaviour from Turnbully of the Terrifying Temper Tantrums.

  741. 741
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:39 pm | Permalink

    Or is the resemblance magnified by the similarity of their lifestyle and social policies?

  742. 742
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    Described by a victim as literally “terrifying”, it is definitely piggish and boorish behaviour from Turnbully of the Terrifying Temper Tantrums.

    Careful, the Heffalump will now bring up Tim Costello’s Childhood and how he bullied Peter :-)

  743. 743
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    GP your posts today are well below your usual standard. Just saying “Labor Minister X is an idiot” in response to everything anyone says doesn’t really cut it. Do you actually know anything about the Solomon Islands logging matter, for example? These are serious charges if substantiated – namely that Turnbull made a personal profit of $25 million dollars through a vandalistic strip-logging operation in the Solomons and also engaged in rax evasion.

  744. 744
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Tony Burke is another Labor dunce.

    Obviously GP is having a bit of infant like fun. Surely he knows Burke is a better chance at becomming PM than anyone in the entire current Liberal Parliamentary Party.

    He has spent the last 18 months slaughtering the National Party (ok fish in a barrel I know).

  745. 745
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:43 pm | Permalink

    and also engaged in rax evasion.

    Don’t you mean Tax ? :-)

  746. 746
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Why is Nicola Roxon looking like Prince Valiant?

    http://content.expressen.se/blog/17/47/81/ninnibeth/images/Valiant.jpg

    Ah yes, she is donning the right gear to fight the swine flu’

  747. 747
    Brenton
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:44 pm | Permalink

    Generic Person, you are SO SPOT ON!!!!!!

  748. 748
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:45 pm | Permalink

    “rax evasion” = tax evasion

  749. 749
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    No 742

    This is what Turnbull said in 2004:

    "I'm not aware of that. I'm aware of the company having a number of logging companies which had difficulties when they were acquired," he told the ABC.

    "You have to remember they were bought by Axiom in order to clean up the mess.

    "The vision of the founders of Axiom, of which I was not one, was to acquire these logging companies and then restructure them and sort of re-position them so that they became sustainable operations.

    "My only involvement with the company was as a corporate doctor."

    Mr Turnbull said he visited the Solomons and met government officials.

    "I was certainly aware of the criticism of logging practices in the Solomons and I was as concerned about them then as the founders were," he said.

    "You've got to understand the whole purpose for indigenous people in the Solomons and other Melanesian countries getting involved in this project was to stop this, these practices."

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/09/30/1096401687340.html

  750. 750
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:46 pm | Permalink

    you are SO SPOT ON

    About what? When? Where? How?????

  751. 751
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    No 746

    Brenton, I appreciate your kind words.

  752. 752
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:47 pm | Permalink

    Obviously Malcolm wasn’t so concerned as to not take their money though.

  753. 753
    zoomster
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:48 pm | Permalink

    Grog

    I think that might be Brendan Nelson posting, heavily disguised.

  754. 754
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Believe me Zoomster, Nelson would not go around praising anyone defending Turnbull.

  755. 755
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:50 pm | Permalink

    No 708

    HuffPo is a whingeathon for Arianna. She went through a troubled divorce and is now taking it out on the Republican party.

  756. 756
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Yeah well done GP, great analysis of the Huffington Post given 708 doesn’t mention the Republican Party at all, and is about the Iranian election.

  757. 757
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    Watch it, fellow bloggers. we know who you are. especially GP.

    'Unmasked' police blogger escapes further action, By Jeananne Craig, Press Association
    Wednesday, 17 June 2009

    No further action will be taken against a policeman who was unmasked after targeting the force and Government ministers in an anonymous online blog, police said today.

    Richard Horton, who serves with Lancashire Constabulary, used the name of Night Jack to post messages about his police work and his opinions on matters of political controversy.

    The 45-year-old detective constable's identity was exposed after the High Court yesterday refused a temporary injunction to prevent The Times newspaper from naming him.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/unmasked-police-blogger-escapes-further-action-1707169.html

  758. 758
    It's Time
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:56 pm | Permalink

    GP’s opinions and assertions are brought about by immaculate conception, unsullied by dirty facts or reality.

  759. 759
    Cuppa
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Poor old Geriatric Pensioner doesn’t appear to know the difference between the truth and stuff that’s made up. No wonder he idolises Honest John.

  760. 760
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 6:59 pm | Permalink

    Nevertheless GP is right. When she was Arianna Stassinopoulos she was a mad right-winger, then she married a dreadful Republican billionaire Michael Huffington. When he failed to be elected to the Senate in 1994 despite spending $28 million of his own money, she dumped him, and suddenly popped up as a liberal Democrat. I enjoy HuffPo but I don’t take Huff herself very seriously.

  761. 761
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    Pretty scary verdit Finns.

    So long as nothing said is defamtory, or divulging of in-confidence information, I see no reason why posters cannot stay anonymous.

  762. 762
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:01 pm | Permalink

    I enjoy HuffPo but I don’t take Huff herself very seriously.

    Nore most of the “celebrity” bloggers there – but it is a good source for links to stories.

    No wonder he idolises Honest John.

    I wonder how he feels about the fact that Rudd showed more class at Costello’s leaving than did Howard?

  763. 763
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    Any Canberra Bludgers off to the mid-winter ball??

  764. 764
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:05 pm | Permalink

    GP

    Turnbull was chairman of Axiom Forest Resources before the strip felling in the Solomons. The Solomon Times makes accusations that Forestry companies have bribed local officials and influenced elections.

    Labor just gave him a warning shot – my guess is there will be no more Ute questions.

  765. 765
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    The mobile phone will turn out to be the most democratic piece of appliance ever invented. Just wait for the internet/web access to be ubiquitous and affordable. All other media will be swept away.

  766. 766
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    I still haven’t located Shanahan.

    Any sightings lately?

  767. 767
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:08 pm | Permalink

    No 758

    Cuppa has run out of things to say, articles to quote. He’s obviously lost the battle of ideas.

  768. 768
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    Or maybe he has work to do …

  769. 769
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    No 763

    ruawake, clearly the ALP is steel reeling from the slaying of Fitzgibbon, so it’s looking for blood in the opposition. The accusations were baseless in 2004 and remain baseless now.

  770. 770
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:11 pm | Permalink

    No 765

    You people constantly berated Shanahan, and now you’re suffering withdrawal symptoms. LOL

    Reminds me of the outpouring of grief when I was banned last year. :)

  771. 771
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:12 pm | Permalink

    No 768

    Oh dear, another embarrassing mistake.

    steel = still.

  772. 772
    ruawake
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    No 768

    Oh dear, another embarrassing mistake.

    Don’t worry GP – we are used to them. ;)

  773. 773
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:15 pm | Permalink

    every blog needs a whipping boy, GP. :-)

    anyhoo must go for the night.

  774. 774
    ShowsOn
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:21 pm | Permalink

    HuffPo is a whingeathon for Arianna. She went through a troubled divorce and is now taking it out on the Republican party.

    Huffington Post is currently providing some of the best coverage of the Iranian protests via this thread:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html

    It now has over 31,000 comments.

    Of course, that didn’t stop Republican spokesman Rush Limbaugh from accusing the Huffington Post of ignoring the Iranian protests:
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/15/rush-limbaugh-accuses-huf_n_215882.html

  775. 775
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:44 pm | Permalink

    In a major tragedy for our hysterical media, “Swine flu ‘less deadly than expected”. Apparently few have been afflicted and even fewer have died.

    Media proprietors were heard to grumble that, “this just will not do”.

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25650887-5005961,00.html

  776. 776
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:46 pm | Permalink

    No further action will be taken against a policeman who was unmasked after targeting the force and Government ministers in an anonymous online blog, police said today.

    No further action will be taken against a policeman who was unmasked after targeting the force and Government ministers in an anonymous online blog, police said today.

    Certainly he and others can comment on criticise their own. What legitimate ‘further’ action could ‘they’ take?

  777. 777
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:48 pm | Permalink

    I am confident I can say without fear of contradiction that Rush Limbaugh is a first class pig. Because it is true.

  778. 778
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    For those looking for the next internecine Liberal stoush, Tony Abbott is stalking Christopher Pyne. Now that Costello has left the building, what does Pyne offer Turnbull in terms of protection.

    Abbott wants the MOB job and Pyne has not exactly shone. You can hear in Gillard’s tone she would prefer a more challenging lunch.

    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/good-lord-at-this-rate-hell-be-back-in-a-few-days-20090616-cgkt.html?page=-1

  779. 779
    fredn
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:53 pm | Permalink

    Well it looks like the share prices in property trusts collapsed today, now I wonder why that would be.

    The question is will labor put Rudd bank up to the senate again, for the pleasure of watching the liberals blink, or will the let it slid so they have something to beat them around the ears with at the nest elections.

  780. 780
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 7:58 pm | Permalink

    fredn,

    Do you have a link?

  781. 781
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:06 pm | Permalink

    Lindsay Tanner sees Hockey and Turnbull under increasing scrutiny now that Cossie has departed. Hockey is clearly a weak link in the Government’s assessment.

    http://blogs.watoday.com.au/business/lindsaytanner/2009/06/17/turnbullhockey.html?page=fullpage#comments

  782. 782
    fredn
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    http://au.finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^AXPJ

    Biggest fall of any sector.

  783. 783
    The Finnigans
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:14 pm | Permalink

    It’s been awhile since I have been to a Mac restaurant. But i didn’t realise the foods have gone so bad.

    An eight-hour siege at a McDonald's restaurant on the NSW mid-north coast has come to an end, with the gunman now in police custody.

    Witnesses say the man walked into the restaurant at the Port Macquarie service centre just after 8am (AEST) on Wednesday, then fired a number of shots into the air with his pistol.

    http://www.smh.com.au/national/mcdonalds-siege-ends-gunman-held-20090617-ch2k.html

  784. 784
    Harry "Snapper" Organs
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:28 pm | Permalink

    Is Brenton the work experience kid?

  785. 785
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:30 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn

    I agree. The live blogging at HuffPo on Iran has been brilliant. It’s been the best way to keep up with what’s going on. It shows what new media can do and why newspapers are becoming redundant.

  786. 786
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:34 pm | Permalink

    “Liveblogging The Uprising” is loaded. The coverage has been alright, but I prefer news, whether it be from traditional sources or blogs to be more independent and balanced.

  787. 787
    Harry "Snapper" Organs
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 8:40 pm | Permalink

    Did anyone else watch QT today and the report from the ex-priest (meddlesome, mostly) Uhlmann on ABC TV News? In my view, the report from Uhlmann bore no resemblance to the QT I watched. It seems to me that at least blogs allow some different percolating of what’s being presented to us. Uhlmann is envy driven (because he’s a failed pollie) at the very least.

  788. 788
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:02 pm | Permalink

    Oz

    I don’t think any news is unbiased. All humans are built with hundreds of biases. I’m sceptical of everything.

  789. 789
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:23 pm | Permalink

    This doesn’t prove the Iranian election was rigged but Mohsen Rezaee’s absolute vote goes down over a 4 hour period on Iranian state TV by 45,000. The numbers add up so it’s not a simple typo. It’s a bad look.

    Then again, the ABC had the Libs winning on their bottom-of-screen seat count in Nov 2007.

    http://loft965.com/2009/06/17/picture-that-proves-iran-election-rigging/

  790. 790
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:25 pm | Permalink

    I don’t think any news is unbiased.

    Of course not. But The Huffington Post doesn’t even pretend to be. And it’s so closely tied to the American establishment that it’s opinions on Iran have to be taken with an enormous grain of salt.

  791. 791
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:26 pm | Permalink

    Also, just because there’s a screen grab on the internet doesn’t mean it’s what happened on the night. There’s been a lot of fake documents floating around to do with Iran lately.

    Geez, I feel like an apologist for dinner jacket.

  792. 792
    Diogenes
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Oz

    Perhaps we should get the guys MHS used to check out his “Scientology bribe” papers on Mike Rann to sort out the truth for us. ;)

  793. 793
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    > Back from rather excessive hacks’ dinner, celebrating today’s highly successful “Pearl Harbor” on Turnbull. And there’s plenty more where that came from. Labor’s tactic over the last few months has been to prepare for the Second Coming of Chicken Man, but now that he has done a runner, Turnbull is the target, and the blowtorch will be held to his goolies for the rest of the session.

    the ALP is still reeling from the slaying of Fitzgibbon

    I did have to laugh at this. Did we look like we were reeling today? Fitzgibbon is no great loss, and deploying Faulkner, Bowen, Arbib and Clare has strengthened the line-up considerably.

  794. 794
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:03 pm | Permalink

    Labor’s tactic over the last few months has been to prepare for the Second Coming of Chicken Man

    And memories of Albo in the oopisition.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Snh1-p1G-H4

  795. 795
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:07 pm | Permalink

    Evidence of the Liberals good financial management.

    The Auditor-General has found that the Royal Australian Navy spent more than $1.4 billion on Sea Sprite helicopters before the project was axed last year.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/17/2601207.htm

  796. 796
    evan14
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    The Liberals started flinging mud at Rudd, Labor has every right to retaliate, and once they’re finished with Turnball, I hope they move on to Hockey and those creeps Pyne and Dutton.

  797. 797
    scorpio
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    Great news.

    Socceroos star Tim Cahill relived his 2006 World Cup heroics with two second half goals against Japan to ensure Australia ended their qualifying campaign for South Africa 2010 in triumph.

    Australia won 2-1 at the MCG on Wednesday night, meaning they went unbeaten through the eight games of their final phase of qualifying and stayed ahead of Japan at the top of their group to earn Asian bragging rights.

    http://news.smh.com.au/breaking-news-sport/socceroos-beat-japan-cahill-scores-two-20090617-chyw.html

  798. 798
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:09 pm | Permalink

    Cahill you bewdy, 69,300 odd at the G including myself and if the MCG doesnt hold the world cup final if we get it, then it would be a disgrace :D

  799. 799
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:10 pm | Permalink

    No 796

    Cahill was outstanding. I’m glad he gave the Fox Sports interviewer the snub because the media slandered him all week – baselessly.

  800. 800
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:11 pm | Permalink

    No 797

    Got to hand it to the Melbourne people – at least they can provide a decent pitch. Stadium Australia’s pitch was third-world quality last week.

  801. 801
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:13 pm | Permalink

    Sport will always be better in Melbourne.

  802. 802
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:16 pm | Permalink

    In breaking news, Justin Madden to run for Essendon.

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25652254-2862,00.html

  803. 803
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:19 pm | Permalink

    The libs have gone back to the future by pre selecting Barresi for Deakin. Howard for Bennelong?

    http://www.vexnews.com/news/4949/deakin-phil-barresi-comfortably-wins-liberal-preselection/

  804. 804
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:21 pm | Permalink

    It was either Barresi *who shouldnt be the candidate* or some right wing nutter…

    Still Barresi lost his seat and he’s a hack…surely there was better qualified people to run for the seat, plus Barresi is a hack and has no prospects of joining the front bench…he’s just a seat warmer.

  805. 805
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    No 801

    Who cares about AFL? Inconsequential sport on this momentous evening for the Socceroos.

  806. 806
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:25 pm | Permalink

    Glen,

    Doesn’t auger well. How soon before we have Bronny Bishop as Opposition spokesperson on Sport?

    Wilson Tuckey as spokesperson for Aboriginal Affair?

  807. 807
    Tom the first and best
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    I think that the Greens vote in Essendon at the next state election but the Greens will still come third but I would not mind if there was an upset other that the Libs winning.

  808. 808
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Tom,

    Any chance of an English translation.

  809. 809
    Socrates
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:28 pm | Permalink

    Agreed GP! Glen, if you were at the game, did the Socceroos play well? On the news highlights they seemed to have created a few chances, apart from the goals.

  810. 810
    Glen
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:30 pm | Permalink

    Yeah I was there bloody cold mind but it is Melbourne :D

    They were good for the first 15-20mins then Japan had all the run and looked good scoring at the 40m mark some 7ft tall Jap scored a bewdy with a header…

    We just came at them in the second and Cahill did the rest :D

  811. 811
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    No 809

    I know this is Alan Jones, but he totally and correctly berated the Daily Terror’s editor for totally fabricating a story about Cahill’s alleged drunkenness.

    http://www.2gb.com/index2.php?option=com_newsmanager&task=view&id=3817

  812. 812
    Tom the first and best
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:37 pm | Permalink

    807

    Sorry, there was meant to be the words “will rise” between Essendon and at but I forgot to type them. I must try and proof read my post more.

  813. 813
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:40 pm | Permalink

    Tom,

    Any chance of an English translation.

    The Greens will create clones of Adele Carles which will result in inner city ALP Seats going Greens despite the fact we’ve been smoking the Wacky Tobaccy for too long :-)

  814. 814
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:53 pm | Permalink

    GP,

    Thank goodness that Jones is unwell. Otherwise that editor would have been eaten alive.

    Pretty easy to see why Cahill was uncooperative with the media tonight after the game.

  815. 815
    Generic Person
    Posted Wednesday, June 17, 2009 at 11:58 pm | Permalink

    No 813

    Yep. There was no need to call Cahill a drunken disgrace. It was a face-saving exercise for the NRL and it was completely fabricated. The DT should be ashamed.

  816. 816
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:34 am | Permalink

    Found this collection of Ads from the 1990 Federal Election Campaign.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtf3KUWjs5c

  817. 817
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:39 am | Permalink

    John Howard 1987 election Ad.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HokVECktpTo

  818. 818
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:15 am | Permalink

    Heh that was a blast from the blast.

    Gawd they were bad.

  819. 819
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:20 am | Permalink

    Heh that was a blast from the blast.

    Gawd they were bad.

    Yeah, and that ALP ad aimed at Greens and Deomcrat Supporters will most certainly raise the ire of a few Green types here :-)

  820. 820
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:19 am | Permalink

    LOL liked Hewson’s anti-handout mentality.

  821. 821
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:22 am | Permalink

    http://english.aljazeera.net/focus/2009/06/200961781431119985.html

    Good article on the situation in Iran.

  822. 822
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:49 am | Permalink

    http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/climate_ctte/submissions/sublist.htm

    Over 8,000 submissions. That is alot. Many good ones amoungst them. We need a carbon tax and higher targets. I endorse the contents of this one.

    http://www.aph.gov.au/senate/committee/climate_ctte/submissions/sub608.pdf

    The main stumbling block for an ETS is the unavoidable time delay between the price signal and the most effective response, which is bringing large quantities of zero emissions energy on line to displace smokestack energy sources. While the market waits for the eventual culmination of the initial response, depending upon the weather, prices from an ETS will be volatile. A low or falling carbon price could easily cause new energy projects to be abandoned, yet excessive prices will
    cause economic harm for no benefit, since they cannot accelerate the delivery of clean energy.

    Simultaneously introduce a Carbon Levy, Carbon Dividend and independent Carbon
    Authority.
    • Establish a Carbon Levy for CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion. This
    adjustable carbon price creates incentives for energy efficiency and the transition to
    low carbon energy sources.
    • All revenue from the carbon charge will be distributed as a Carbon Dividend equally to all citizens (half for children) through the tax and welfare systems. The Carbon Dividend recognises the right to an equal share of the carbon emissions budget. It will compensate consumers for price rises and reward reduced consumption of fossil energy.
    • The Carbon Authority will be an independent trust, empowered to set the carbon price
    for the purpose of controlling demand to meet emissions targets. It will monitor CO2
    emissions, infrastructure developments and all aspects of the carbon economy to
    inform a mid and long term view about the appropriate carbon price.

    Focus on consumption! It follows that national targets must be calculated and specified to include only emissions generated in the provision of goods and services consumed by the citizens of that jurisdiction. Imports must be included and exports excluded from national emissions targets and assessments.

    This guy is reading my mind! Fucus on consumption!

    By basing greenhouse emission reduction targets on the 1990 emission levels of each country, those that were emitting the most at that time were given a greater allowance under the Kyoto Protocol. This disadvantages countries whose lower levels of economic activity at the time meant they were not emitting much at all in 1990. The 1990 baseline freezes the status quo, consolidating ‘the historic overuse by Northern industry at the expense of the South', and is therefore inequitable
    (CEO 2001). This situation has been termed 'carbon colonialism'.
    Larry Lohmann (1999) also claims that the Kyoto emission targets are inequitable:
    "Any measure requiring all countries to reduce emissions by similar percentages, for example, would allow the US to go on producing roughly one-quarter of the greenhouse gases released yearly, even though it has only four per cent of the world's population. Similarly, North-South 'carbon trading' suggests that it is legitimate for rich countries or companies who already use more than their share of the world's carbon sinks and stocks to buy still more of them"

    Given that exporters are effectively exempted and some are unjustly compensated, but imports are not included, Australian products for local consumption may be exported and re-imported to avoid CPRS expenses. Any business which cannot do this will carry an unfair burden and jobs will be lost because of muddled thinking.
    cash which has itself been accumulated partly through a history of overexploiting those sinks and stocks.

    Is this true? Can Aussie products be exported and then re-imported to avoid the ETS? If so, then thats pretty bad and it might well be “economical” for some companies to do that.
    I’ve gotta read through more of these – bound to be baried treasure!

  823. 823
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:54 am | Permalink

    From the same submittion.

    In brief - Features of a well designed carbon pricing mechanism
    The price of carbon would be determined for the whole planet by a global mechanism, however, in the meantime, a national scheme should have the following features:-
    • A target trajectory which is closely bound to a strategy for the transition to a zero carbon economy.
    • A flexible emissions trajectory which can be changed in response to new science within 30 days, with strategic milestones rescheduled accordingly - and anticipated costs adjusted.
    • Coverage of the whole economy.
    • Employ scientifically sound and symmetrical accounting systems, so that positive or negative changes in biomass incur an equivalent debt or credit. Forest, biomass and ecosystem managers will pay for the loss of carbon from storage, but receive credits for regrowth.
    • A carbon price that is always high enough to drive large-scale zero-emissions energy infrastructure investments.
    • A carbon price which is stable, so the retail energy price reflects the mid-term price of large- scale zero emissions energy. (Specifically, to avoid the tendency for excessive prices during the years of waiting while sufficient clean energy from new infrastructure to come on line.)
    • Carbon revenue itself should not be used to “ease” or reduce energy prices. That would subsidise high energy users and discourage efficiency improvements. However, public and private sectors are encouraged to invest heavily in zero carbon infrastructure.
    • Carbon Dividends. 100% of net "carbon revenue" should be distributed equally to every citizen (half for children).
    • A green energy investment scheme for individuals wishing to invest directly in zero carbon energy infrastructure and accelerate the transition. A personal option for Carbon Dividends to be invested automatically in "Green Bonds" if desired.
    • Border Tax Adjustments to decouple the effects of unequal international carbon prices on the local economy.
    • The current Australian carbon levy to apply to imports - equivalent to the emissions imposts for locally produced goods and services.
    • No free permits! However, carbon expenses associated with products exported from Australia will be refunded, until a global scheme is implemented.
    • Unconditionally reduces emissions due to consumption by Australian citizens to (near) zero by 2040. (An offer “By 2030” has not yet been modelled and assumptions should be checked. I’m guessing it will work if emissions due to local consumption by Australian citizens, including imports, is less than half the national total CO2-e emissions. They may not be.)
    • Conditionally reduces emissions due to Australian exports when our customers, pay a premium for commodities with low levels of associated emissions, or else a global carbon price with universal dividend is implemented.

    No matter how much an ETS behaves like and Adjustable Carbon Tax, an ETS cannot be as good if it does not impose the carbon price on imports. Under an ETS, attempts to apply carbon charges to imports will look like import tariffs. But, a TAX applied equally to domestic and imported products will pass the WTO rules, as did the GST. This is vital if Australian products and those made with low emissions, are to compete fairly with products manufactured exploiting “free emissions” zones.

    I wish the pollies would start talking in such a way. sigh…

  824. 824
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 8:10 am | Permalink

    Who cares about AFL? Inconsequential sport on this momentous evening for the Socceroos.

    #804, GP – didn’t i say to you this could be the beginning of a beautiful friendship?

    :wink: :lol: :grin: :cool:

    Especially that sleazy sport called Thugby League.

  825. 825
    Socrates
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 9:49 am | Permalink

    For GPs finance education, here is the first evidence of the damage caused by cancelling Ruddbank:
    http://www.theage.com.au/national/fire-sale-warning-over-ruddbank-20090617-chw0.html

    This bill should be sent back to the Senate at the earliest possible opportunity.

  826. 826
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 9:51 am | Permalink

    Heysen Molotov

    Some of the submissions are great, and go pretty in-depth in describing the problems with the CPRS. The CPRS is incredibly complex, and the (enormous) problems in it aren’t that easy to communicate.

    That’s why it’s easy for Wong to get away with it using catchphrases like “This will put a price on carbon for the first time” which just treat everyone like an idiot.

  827. 827
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 9:52 am | Permalink

    Apparently it won’t be sent back till October.

  828. 828
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 9:56 am | Permalink

    Oz, which part of the statement “This will put a price on carbon for the first time” do you disagree with?

  829. 829
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    We need a carbon tax

    A carbon tax does not guarantee reductions in carbon emissions. Fail.

  830. 830
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Re-read my post, I’m doubting that it will put a price on carbon.

    But it’s like one step forward, fourteen steps back.

    The whole point of a carbon price is for it to allow the market to transition to from an emissions intensive economy, to a low-emissions one. Nothing in the CPRS ensures that this will happen in Australia, a point that investment companies (whom a carbon price is generally targeting) readily admit. This is simply one problem, to do with the carbon price. There are so many other huge flaws in the legislation. I’ve tried to point them out the last few months, but probably failed in doing it properly. A lot of the submissions do a better job than I.

    But it really shouldn’t be surprising that it’s rubbish scheme given the attitude of the government. Half the time we were trying to be persuaded that the government was going out on a political limb acting on climate change. Everyone knows that’s a joke. Climate change was a key issue at the last election and both private and public polling shows that it is refusing to go away.

    Not that anyone else here will agree, and I’ll probably get flamed, but the policy was never about the environment but about wedging the Coalition and ensuring that Labor’s business mates and Australia’s resource based, carbon intensive economy were entrenched for many years.

    The pathetic attempts to try and delude Australians into thinking that we can make significant cuts to our emissions without a pretty broad restructuring of our economy, which will mean some sectors shrink, is just sad, and holding us back from progress. The horse and cart analogy sums this point up well.

  831. 831
    philofsydney
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    Stadium Australia’s pitch was third-world quality last week.

    God I hate it when people say that. Ever been to the third world GP? I can tell you that their football pitches aren’t similar to Stadium Australia’s.

  832. 832
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:16 am | Permalink

    *I’m not doubting.

  833. 833
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:17 am | Permalink

    I dont mind political parties opposing government policy so long as they themselves have actually written and publicised their own definitive policy…

    As far as i know Mute Hunt has no alternative policy and the Greens have no policy either and just bang on about having deeper cuts…

    I hope this ETS fails in the Senate but I hope the Libs and others can come up with something better than just obstructing the Rudd Government…

  834. 834
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 10:26 am | Permalink

    A carbon tax does not guarantee reductions in carbon emissions. Fail.

    Neither does the CPRS.

    You do realise that the pricing mechanism in the CPRS is effectively a carbon tax, don’t you? What, with a price cap initially at $10 and then at $40.

    I’m not completely convinced on either a tax or an ETS. I think a well structured ETS with high targets, less compensation and a high floor on the price of carbon is a good policy. But I like the simplicity of carbon taxes, and there’s some studies suggesting they are more efficient as well. The inability to quantify domestic emissions is pretty overstated, given the CPRS can’t do it either. And as long as you leave the tax rate open to change and monitor the impacts you can pretty accurately model were emissions are going. If you back it up by other policy measures like investment in renewable energy, public transport and energy efficiency then you can ensure significant cuts.

  835. 835
    Trubbell at Mill
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    The neocon hive that is the OO may have finally decided (with some help from Rupert?) that their idiotic denialism on AGW has destroyed enough of their credibility – you can tell it’s reached that stage when people stop debating you and just laugh at you or ignore you (are you reading Senator Fielding?). Being ignored and dismissed is intolerable to them.

    So! In the classic OO pattern, we will now see a new battlefront opened against the evil left / green eco-nazi / latte hugging / rainforest sipping / union thug / collective anythings /… in the field of……Education!!! TO ARMS!! Let the call go out across the land! We must stop any long term credit attaching to the ‘left’ from this nasty school building program! It must be destroyed and discredited! Liberal supporters, send us your stories! They don’t have to be accurate, we’ll print them anyway! It’s the volume of noise that counts with the punters, not facts!

    I attended a (state) school fete the other day and there was a little exercise book where people could write in their comments about the displayed plans for the new multipurpose building. There was comment after comment along the lines of “Thank you, Thank you Mr Rudd”, “At last, a government that is putting money into education”, and “This is what governments should have been doing for the last fifty years – Go Julia”. Make no mistake, the neocons see this as an issue that can lock in labor votes for decades. The OO will be going all out to prevent that.

  836. 836
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:01 am | Permalink

    You do realise that the pricing mechanism in the CPRS is effectively a carbon tax, don’t you? What, with a price cap initially at $10 and then at $40.

    Sure it puts a price on carbon, but it only issues a particular number of permits to allow emission of a set amount of carbon. A carbon tax does no such thing. You could put out a carbon tax of $100 per tonne, but if certain companies decide it is better to pay the money than lower there emissions, you achieve nothing.

  837. 837
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:02 am | Permalink

    …or you just put everyone out of business

  838. 838
    philofsydney
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:15 am | Permalink

    Excuse my ignorance, but what’s OO?

  839. 839
    Benji
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    No 834

    Totally agree. At my kids local public school people are happy to be seeing some new facilities being paid for by the governemnt, instead of having to be scrimped and saved for by the P & C.

    Allbull on AM this morning, claiming that the coalition government used to vett the school spending more closely. Its true, the condition was the school had to put up a flagpole to get any money!

  840. 840
    Benji
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:17 am | Permalink

    OO = Opposition Orifice (The Australian)

  841. 841
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    No 830

    God I hate it when people say that. Ever been to the third world GP? I can tell you that their football pitches aren’t similar to Stadium Australia’s.

    Come on phil. The pitch last week was joke. It was all chopped up and lumpy. Part of the problem is the fact that it is frequently used as a rugby pitch. But that is beside the point. The MCG was a mile in front in terms of quality. Even Lucas Neil said as much post-match.

  842. 842
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:44 am | Permalink

    No 838

    Benji, silly names for pollies are banned by William.

  843. 843
    Benji
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:49 am | Permalink

    No 841

    Sorry if that offends. No comment on the flagpole then? Now there was a waste of money.

  844. 844
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 11:52 am | Permalink

    No 842

    Doesn’t offend, but it’s fair game since I can’t call the PM Krudd.

    s96 of the Constitution, determined virtually unreviewable by the High Court, allows the Commonwealth to grant funds to the States on any conditions which they think fit. The Commonwealth Government has been taking advantage of the grants power to control policy making of the States for decades, particularly since the first and second uniform tax cases.

  845. 845
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    OO = Opposition Orifice (The Australian)

    aka The Daily Liberal

  846. 846
    philofsydney
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    840 – Yes, I know, I’m not really picking on you or the pitch. It’s just my pet hate, as someone who’s spent a lot of time working in developing nations, when these stupid rich white people (again, not you specifically) come on the news and say ‘it’s like a third world nation.’

  847. 847
    jaundiced view
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    Oz @ 829

    the policy was never about the environment but about wedging the Coalition and ensuring that Labor’s business mates and Australia’s resource based, carbon intensive economy were entrenched for many years.

    That’s true to a large extent I reckon, but the required world emissions plan can achieve its aims without any reduction in the resources sector in Australia, so there’s nothing for them to fear. It is only in the restructuring in some industries that political danger lies. However:
    with and ETS we get more jobs right up to 2050; changes AMONG some jobs, but not losses OF jobs. This should become a mantra.

    In the meantime, is the legislation to be introduced on Monday? Looks like the opposition will use a tried and true US technique to delay a vote in the Senate – and thus avoid a DD trigger. The milksop approach to important legislation:

    “Filibustering may delay carbon trading vote”
    The Opposition is likely seek to prolong debate on the Government's carbon emissions trading scheme in a bid to delay a vote in the Senate.
    The Government wants legislation for its scheme passed by the end of next week.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/06/18/2601577.htm

    And is there a shift in the hard line of the Greens’? Or not? This could possibly be construed as a potential face-saver for a last-minute acceptance of the legislation:

    Meanwhile, Australian Greens leader Bob Brown says his party is still negotiating with the government, but wants more action on forests.
    "I have discovered no reason... why the government can't move on reducing the destruction of forests and woodlands in Australia," Senator Brown said, adding it would reduce the nation's greenhouse gas output by 20 per cent.

    http://news.brisbanetimes.com.au/breaking-news-national/coalition-wont-rule-out-stalling-ets-20090618-cig2.html

  848. 848
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:08 pm | Permalink

    No 845

    Nothing wrong with being rich and white. But I accept your point.

  849. 849
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:22 pm | Permalink

    No 833

    Hear hear. A carbon tax would be much easier to administer and it could be applied progressively (with higher emitting industries being subject to higher rates etc). The money can then directly be reinvested by the Government in to solar, wind, nuclear.

    The problem with an ETS is the fact that many of the technologies that we expect businesses to adopt to curb their spiralling emissions don’t exist or are not fully developed. Of course an ETS would fast-track their development, but ultimately the ETS will effectively act like a tax on business for its first few years anyway until cost-effective, reliable and proven technology comes on line.

  850. 850
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    Hear hear. A carbon tax would be much easier to administer and it could be applied progressively (with higher emitting industries being subject to higher rates etc). The money can then directly be reinvested by the Government in to solar, wind, nuclear.

    Except it wouldn’t work, and wouldn’t interface with schemes in other countries

  851. 851
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:29 pm | Permalink

    Shame Hunt wont write up a policy along the lines you suggest GP.

    It pains me that the two of us could come up with more coherent policies than our current front bench…

  852. 852
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    You could put out a carbon tax of $100 per tonne, but if certain companies decide it is better to pay the money than lower there emissions, you achieve nothing.

    The CPRS will provide an unlimited amount of free permits for some of our heaviest emitting industries, this same criticism applies.

    And even *if* the free permits run out (I say if, not when, because I find it hard to believe that any government in 2009 that can’t break free of the greenhouse mafia will be able too in 2015) there’s nothing stopping those companies from just paying to buy offsets overseas.

    So just like with a carbon tax, no quantifiable number of domestic emissions cuts.

  853. 853
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    No 849

    How do you know that it wouldn’t work? The EU has had a carbon scheme for several years and it hasn’t worked. The pro-ETS brigade keep on saying that a market solution is the best way forward, yet it’s not a true market because they’re excluding sensitive industries (for strong reasons, I might add).

    Even then, the market is only going to work if there are real alternatives to pursue once a price on carbon has been imposed. There aren’t a lot of real solutions. This problem, if it’s as bad as the scientists proclaim, requires large-scale investment to completely change the sources of energy that power our economies. That’s only going to come from heavy government investment.

  854. 854
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:32 pm | Permalink

    Stadium Australia – a great place to play and watch AFL and NRL.

    And I don’t think the soccer ground are unhappy either GP. They have to play their game to suit all types of fields.

    Stop your Young Lib whining about it and get back to some study.

  855. 855
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    Except it wouldn’t work, and wouldn’t interface with schemes in other countries

    Is the goal to reduce emissions and transition to a low carbon economy, or to create a new playground for the shonks and the spivs that gave us the GFC?

  856. 856
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:35 pm | Permalink

    No 850

    The problem is that Turnbull doesn’t want to look like he’s adding more taxes yet if people truly believe in the dangers that climate change heralds and they truly believe in the urgency of a problem, a very, very significant amount of money is required to totally transform the way in which our economy depends on energy. An ETS is not going to bring these changes in fast enough. This requires Government action.

  857. 857
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:38 pm | Permalink

    No 852

    BH, spoken like a true, clueless anti-soccer person.

    Unlike the other football codes, soccer requires a pretty high-quality pitch if you want a standard of play that’s higher than backyard soccer.

    Frankly, for a nation that wants to host the world cup, Stadium Australia is the perfect excuse for us NOT to host it.

  858. 858
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:42 pm | Permalink

    Personally, if Turnbull actually thought about this, i think he’d win the argument if he put his case forward logically and simply. A carbon tax makes so much more sense and John Howard proved that you can win an election on a policy platform of a new tax.

  859. 859
    philofsydney
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:45 pm | Permalink

    855 – from Goverment with a whopping majority. And a carbon tax is very different to your average ‘battler’ than a GST.

  860. 860
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 12:47 pm | Permalink

    Labor calls bullshit on Libs pathetic scare camaign over debt and deficit. Mark Arbib telling it like it is.

    http://www.thepunch.com.au/articles/frightening-the-life-out-of-voters-debt-scare-campaign/?referrer=email

  861. 861
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:11 pm | Permalink

    I look forward to today’s QT, what have they got to smear Malcopops with?

  862. 862
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:14 pm | Permalink

    Why not make the carbon tax revenue neutral by cutting other taxes (GST? income tax) by the same amount. That way there’s a disincentive to not pollute (good for the environment, and the economy) as opposed to the current disincentive not to consume and to work (bad for the economy).

    Then cut the $11 billion in subsidies to the fossil fuels sector and invest it in renewable energy.

    Good energy policy policy 101 right there.

  863. 863
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    How do you know that it wouldn’t work?

    I’ve already explained the reasons. If you can’t be bothered reading my posts, I can’t be bothered re-writing them.

  864. 864
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:23 pm | Permalink

    No 861

    Dario, you’ve never explained anything.

  865. 865
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:26 pm | Permalink

    855 Generic Person – How many seats did Howard lose at that election again?

  866. 866
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:28 pm | Permalink

    Dario, you’ve never explained anything

    I could say the same of you

  867. 867
    vote1maxine
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Where can I tune into QT in HoR? Newsradio has been broadcasting the Senate lately.

  868. 868
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Don’t worry GP I can now tell you. 18 seats were lost to Labor by the coalition. Hmm

  869. 869
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    No 863

    How many seats did he win at the following election and the election after that?

  870. 870
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:31 pm | Permalink

    No 866

    No, the Government lost 14 seats.

  871. 871
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:32 pm | Permalink

    vote1maxine, check this out.
    http://webcast.aph.gov.au/livebroadcasting/

  872. 872
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    Add these up GP (867) then try again.
    http://www.aec.gov.au/Elections/federal_elections/1998/hor/seats.htm

    How many seats did he win at the following election and the election after that?

    Irrelevant, those elections were fought on other issues. ‘98 was fought on the GST.

  873. 873
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:36 pm | Permalink

    No 870

    Labor gained 18 seats, but 4 of those were from independents.

  874. 874
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    We’re talking from one election to the next.

  875. 875
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:40 pm | Permalink

    No 872

    Gary, the question was “How many seats did Howard lose at that election”; I answered correctly by giving you the figure of 14.

  876. 876
    vote1maxine
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:42 pm | Permalink

    Thanks GB.

  877. 877
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:43 pm | Permalink

    Therese rained on the parade of the media lizards while Kate shaken and stirred their dry Martini. Bond, my name is Bond.

    Held in the Great Hall of Parliament House, this year the belle of the ball was the newly slim Therese Rein.

    Running a very close second was Federal Sports Minister Kate Ellis, who looked every bit the parliamentary pin-up girl in a black, beaded cocktail frock.

    http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,25652473-5001021,00.html

    Meanwhile back in Q, all the Liberals can serve up is Sophie Mirabela. Not fair, not fair at all.

  878. 878
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:44 pm | Permalink

    At the bottom of that chart GP it reads -

    Note: the above compares party representation immediately after the 1996 and 1998 elections.
    Results of any by-elections have been ignored. Please also note that the ALP held seat of Namadgi (ACT) was abolished in the 1997 redistribution of electoral boundaries.

    So Labor over that term and at the ‘98 election gained 18 seats in total from the government from the ‘96 election.

  879. 879
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:46 pm | Permalink

    So Labor over that term and at the ‘98 election gained 18 seats in total from the government from the ‘96 election.

    A term and an election which was very much about the GST.

  880. 880
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:49 pm | Permalink

    Finns elections arent a beauty contest…

    BTW Kate Ellis couldnt hold a candle to Ali Moore ;)

  881. 881
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:51 pm | Permalink

    Glen, yes, try to tell that to Sarkozy. Anyway, your side aint got no beauties, so dont be jealous.

  882. 882
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:52 pm | Permalink

    No 878

    Or Juanita. Saucy minxes, they are. :D

  883. 883
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:53 pm | Permalink

    Trubbel at Mill

    I’ve noticed that too. They must have realised that Turnbull is going to end up voting for the ETS so there’s not much mileage in an issue both parties agree on. They have gone completely feral on the schools projects which is their headline on the dead tree version and currently online with Turnbull’s complaints.

    MALCOLM Turnbull has savaged the Rudd Government's $14.7 billion investment in school infrastructure as the biggest pork-barrelling exercise in Australian history and a complete shambles.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25654223-601,00.html

  884. 884
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    #879 – Juanita, yes, i understand the attraction of an older woman. “wink:

  885. 885
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:55 pm | Permalink

    Well no but we’ll have Sarah Henderson before too long :D

    BTW i think all this talk of Kate Ellis being the most attractive MP in the House is baloney the Member for Fremantle Melissa Parke is much more appealing…

    http://www.news.com.au/perthnow/story/0,21498,25244277-2761,00.html?from=public_rss

  886. 886
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:57 pm | Permalink

    MALCOLM Turnbull has savaged the Rudd Government's $14.7 billion investment in school infrastructure as the biggest pork-barrelling exercise in Australian history and a complete shambles.

    This coming from the “Daily Liberal” which is running the opposition’s anti – stimulus package campaign.

  887. 887
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:58 pm | Permalink

    BTW i think all this talk of Kate Ellis being the most attractive MP in the House is baloney the Member for Fremantle Melissa Parke is much more appealing…

    Agreed Glen.

  888. 888
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    GB stop your whining about the Australian just ready the Age or Socialist Morning Herald.

  889. 889
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 1:59 pm | Permalink

    BTW we are turning into the USA GB because we need only read newspapers that appeal to our own politics it is sad but true…

  890. 890
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:00 pm | Permalink

    This coming from the “Daily Liberal” which is running the opposition’s anti - stimulus package campaign.

    And boosted by Malcopos appearing on RN Breakfast which was rebroadcast on commerical news reports.

  891. 891
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:01 pm | Permalink

    Haha they got Albo stepping in for Gillard.

    “Settle down Christopher” – Rudd.

  892. 892
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Actually, elections are partly a beauty contest. Studies have shown that you get more votes if you are attractive. It’s worth about 2%. The fact that it didn’t get Mia Handshin over the line against Pyne is a very strong argument that the Sturt election was rigged IMHO. ;)

  893. 893
    triton
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:07 pm | Permalink

    When Gillard is absent it takes two cabinet ministers to answer questions on her behalf.

  894. 894
    Mr Squiggle
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:16 pm | Permalink

    Therese may have lost a few kilos, my main hope is that she has modified her dress sense.

    Remember that outfit in New York with the frilly cuffs?

    Christ, we nearly had a diplomatic incident on our hands that day

  895. 895
    Cuppa
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Sloppy Joe sent outside for one hour.

  896. 896
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:48 pm | Permalink

    Sloppy Joe sent outside for one hour.

    Teacher! Teacher! Cuppa used a rude name for Joe! That’s not allowed!!!

  897. 897
    Benji
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 2:54 pm | Permalink

    Yes I was punished earlier by the girlie swot, its not fair!

  898. 898
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    BTW we are turning into the USA GB because we need only read newspapers that appeal to our own politics it is sad but true…

    There’s a new book on this issue:
    http://www.amazon.com/Going-Extremes-Minds-Unite-Divide/dp/0195378016/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1245301188&sr=8-2

    Note, Obama has nominated the author to become a bureaucrat in his administration.

  899. 899
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:04 pm | Permalink

    GB – are you watching QT. I’ve notice Hockey’s been twittering all this week in QT but is Turnbull now doing the same – he is fiddling with his mobile while Rudd is speaking.

    Is that what we pay them for – to sit there and fiddle with their mobiles

  900. 900
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    WOW! My old primary school is getting a new library and the hall upgraded!

    The hall was built as a S.A. government Jubilee 150 project in 1986. Good to hear it is now being upgraded over 20 years later.

  901. 901
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:08 pm | Permalink

    I’ve notice Hockey’s been twittering all this week in QT but is Turnbull now doing the same

    I prefer the fake Joe Hockey twitter, it has gems like this:

    Ughhh, dont wanna do Parliament tomorrow. If I shaved Dick Adam's beard and got him to sit in my seat would anyone notice the difference?

    http://m.twitter.com/JoetheHockey

  902. 902
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    Sorry Glen, New Kids on the Block have cancelled their tour:
    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25654941-29277,00.html

  903. 903
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:10 pm | Permalink

    It appears that since Costello’s departure you’ve all found who to direct your insults to on our side of the House…

  904. 904
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:13 pm | Permalink

    GB - are you watching QT. I’ve notice Hockey’s been twittering all this week in QT but is Turnbull now doing the same - he is fiddling with his mobile while Rudd is speaking.

    Is that what we pay them for - to sit there and fiddle with their mobiles

    Malcopos hasn’t updated his twitter since this morning.

    http://twitter.com/TurnbullMalcolm

  905. 905
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:14 pm | Permalink

    http://business.smh.com.au/business/business-confidence-bounces-back-20090618-ciq8.html

    Business confidence bounces back

    There has been a massive jump in business confidence despite actual conditions staying around levels not seen since the 1991/92 recession, a new report shows.

    The index of overall business conditions contained in a survey by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) and Westpac rose 3.9 points to 38.3 in the June quarter.

    A level below 50 indicates more respondents are suffering a contraction in business activity than an expansion.

    "It does indicate some signs of economic improvement and it may indicate that we have bounced off the lows of the March quarter,'' ACCI's acting chief executive Greg Evans told reporters in Canberra.

  906. 906
    Trubbell at Mill
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    Classic from Tanner just now (directed at Abbott) – “I thought I told you to stay in the car and bark at strangers…”

    lol

  907. 907
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:17 pm | Permalink

    I prefer the fake Joe Hockey twitter, it has gems like this

    Good one Showson and true

  908. 908
    BK
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:26 pm | Permalink

    Pyne is achieving the impossible today. He has become even more objectionable!

  909. 909
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:29 pm | Permalink

    The Opposition is an embarrassment but, of course, the journos won’t see it like that.

  910. 910
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:34 pm | Permalink

    The government is a disgrace for not answering questions. Albanese blabbered on about nothing. What’s even more worrying is that he has the diction and intonation of an overgrown baby.

  911. 911
    dave
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Pyne kicked – about time.

  912. 912
    BK
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:36 pm | Permalink

    Bye bye Pyne – AGAIN!

  913. 913
    dave
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:37 pm | Permalink

    The government is a disgrace for not answering questions.

    The opposition is a disgrace for turning the parliament into a circus.

  914. 914
    Cuppa
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Pyne (and any Liberal) should have his pay docked to the rate of one day for each hour his unruly behaviour causes him to be made absent from proceedings. He could look upon it as Parliamentary WorkChoices.

  915. 915
    dave
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:38 pm | Permalink

    Mesma the next to be chucked out.

  916. 916
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Go Bronnie!

  917. 917
    philofsydney
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:40 pm | Permalink

    The government is a disgrace for not answering questions

    That’s what all Governments do.

    The opposition is a disgrace for turning the parliament into a circus.

    That’s what all oppositions do.

  918. 918
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    What was on the sign by Tangey – did anyone see it.

  919. 919
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    What was unparliamentary about Dennis Jensen’s sign?

  920. 920
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    Seriously, how many times can Pyne be chucked out before he gets disciplined by someone. If anyone else kept getting suspended for poor behaviour they would be looking at the sack. He wouldn’t be able to get away with that crap out in private.

  921. 921
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    What was on it GP

  922. 922
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    rofl a letter is presented which states a liberal member thanking he education minister for resolving a problem a week ago that was published in the daily liberal today, and then they get all narky.

    tsk tsk

  923. 923
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    895 – I noticed that BH. It shouldn’t be allowed surely.

  924. 924
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Dio the ALP were expelled far more during the previous Government. Pyne is certainly breaking no records.

  925. 925
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:45 pm | Permalink

    Dont worry Gary, he’ll not be in the next Parliament :D and about time…

  926. 926
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:46 pm | Permalink

    GB – Maybe Psephos can let us know how many times Pyne can get away with being thrown out and Hockey for that matter. They must be adding up by now.

    And I don’t think they should be allowed to twitter or use mobiles in QT. Heard that the gallery twitter with the Libs throughout QT. They think it is funny but I don’t.

    It’s our money they are using cos we pay for their goddamn phones as well with their allowances.

  927. 927
    Cuppa
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    Which miserly Liberal was it who was suspended for 24 hours?

  928. 928
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:48 pm | Permalink

    BH if Rudd is going to spend 7-10mins answering each question then the Opposition should be able to do whatever they want to overcome that sufferance :D

  929. 929
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:49 pm | Permalink

    You aren’t allowed to bring in communication devices into parliament, I don’t know who in the press gallery twitters from the house in QT.

    Annabelle Crabb does “twitsard”, and Bernard Keane often tweets what’s going on but they do it while watching the live stream.

  930. 930
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:51 pm | Permalink

    BH I think it’s great that people have real time access to their politicians. It’s the future.

  931. 931
    dave
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    The libs have surrendered on providing any alternative to running the econony

  932. 932
    Yo ho ho
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    It appears that since Costello’s departure you’ve all found who to direct your insults to on our side of the House…

    Glen, i’d take it as flattery. To me, it seems that in politics the insults are usually directed at those deemed threatening.

  933. 933
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    GP

    If that’s true and it was always the same people, then I think it should slide although it helps explain why politicians are held in such low esteem by the populace.

    On another matter, a commentator notes something that I’d thought about in Iran. There are about 32 dead protesters. They will all have funerals. The funerals tend to get messy and more protesters die at the funeral and so on. That’s what happened in the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which was led by several of the losing presidential candidates, so they know how to do it right. There’s a great book on it called The Shah of Shahs by Kapuscinski.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/13/iran-demonstrations-viole_n_215189.html

  934. 934
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:53 pm | Permalink

    Glen – I well remember Costello taking ages to answer questions when he felt like it but usually the answers were for 30 seconds and the rest of the time was spent in virtriol against Labor.

    What is good for the goose is good for the gander.

    Annabelle is usually in the Gallery – or at least for most of the time.

  935. 935
    dave
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    It appears that since Costello’s departure you’ve all found who to direct your insults to on our side of the House…

    Well there is a clear target now.

    Who would bother targeting pyne or hockey or abbott – they target themselves just by opening their mouths.

  936. 936
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:55 pm | Permalink

    Yo Ho it appears that the Rudd huggers are afraid of Mr Hockey and that is fine by me because he’ll be leading us soon enough…

  937. 937
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    Harry Jenkins has the patience of a saint, but even he is getting tired of the endless disuption and points of order from the Libs.
    Glen and GP: your lot are a disgrace!
    What’s the definition of “tool”? Christopher Pyne.

  938. 938
    triton
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    GP

    The government is a disgrace for not answering questions.

    I take it that this sentiment applies equally to past coalition governments and their PMs, e.g., John Howard.

  939. 939
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:57 pm | Permalink

    Yo Ho it appears that the Rudd huggers are afraid of Mr Hockey and that is fine by me because he’ll be leading us soon enough…

    Hockey is vaguely amusing, I’ll give you that much LOL

  940. 940
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    But what I’m really upset about?
    Why have they moved the Member for Bass?

  941. 941
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:58 pm | Permalink

    Jensen held up a sign saying “arrogant”.

  942. 942
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 3:59 pm | Permalink

    #936, hear hear hear.

  943. 943
    BH
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Glen – I love it when Hockey appears anywhere – as soon as he opens his mouth his sloppiness shows. He has trouble with the truth on most occasions.

    Heard his debating in the House last night before dinner and it was woeful.

    My other half, who isn’t really interested in politics, listened for awhile and was appalled but ending up laughing about Hockey. Said ‘Is that the best they can do for an economic response”. His reaction was a really big deal for an apathetic apolitical bloke.

  944. 944
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    Obama copies Gillard’s treatment of Pyne.

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25655104-12377,00.html

  945. 945
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    Oh for goodness sake…

    http://www.news.com.au/story/0,27574,25655104-23109,00.html

    PEOPLE for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) is upset with US President Barack Obama killing a fly during a televised interview - and are sending him a parcel to prove it.

    The Daily Telegraph reports PETA is sending President Barack Obama a Katcha Bug Humane Bug Catcher, a device that allows users to trap a house fly and then release it outside.

    "We support compassion even for the most curious, smallest and least sympathetic animals," PETA spokesman Bruce Friedrich said.

    "We believe that people, where they can be compassionate, should be, for all animals."

    During an interview for CNBC at the White House on Tuesday, a fly intruded on Mr Obama's conversation with correspondent John Harwood.

    "Get out of here," the President told the pesky insect.

    When it didn't, he waited for the fly to settle, put his hand up and then smacked it dead.

    "Swatting a fly on TV indicates he's not perfect," Mr Friedrich said.

    "We're happy to say that we wish he hadn't."

  946. 946
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Wong just gets worse and worse.

    Penny Wong’s pathetic stunt of linking the Renewable Energy Target legislation to the passage of its ETS bill has been rendered moot by Steve Fielding getting support from the Coalition and Nick Xenophon to refer the bills to a Senate inquiry even before they’ve been introduced into the Senate.

    The Coalition is deeply, and rightly, angered that the Government is so blatantly playing politics with an issue it says is one of “the great moral challenges” of our time, especially when it had indicated support for the RET, despite misgivings amongst the Nationals.

    The Government is happy to sacrifice its Renewable Energy Target for political expediency.

    Wong’s cynical renewable energy play
    http://www.crikey.com.au/2009/06/18/wongs-renewable-energy-target-play-and-other-cynical-disgraces/

  947. 947
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    BTW when the heck is APAC going to every state on digital television, why oh why does bloody NSW get everything first stupid Sydney first making sure Melbourne couldnt be the capital city so we had Canberra *rolls eyes* and now no APAC for yonks…and yes i am even thinking about paying for Foxtel but i doubt that would be worth it.

  948. 948
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Christopher Pyne will always be kicked out under Labor.

  949. 949
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Dario someone should tell those nobs that it was an insect for crying out loud!

  950. 950
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    Howard used to answer some questions with one word answers – no explanation at all.

  951. 951
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:04 pm | Permalink

    Diog, you also just get worse and worse.

  952. 952
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:05 pm | Permalink

    Serial pest thrown out of Parliamnet. Surprisingly, it’s not Pyne.

    http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25655172-5005961,00.html

  953. 953
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:06 pm | Permalink

    942- The government being cynical? That’s a good one. How about the opposition just pass the bloody thing.

  954. 954
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:07 pm | Permalink

    Christopher Pyne will always be kicked out under Labor.

    What’s laughable is that some conservatives pick Pyne as a future leader of the Liberals.

  955. 955
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes, don’t you know that Keane is a Green partisan?

  956. 956
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    #936, hear hear hear.

    Yeah, shame on them for sticking Jodie Campbell up the back!
    What did she do to piss off Rudd?

  957. 957
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:10 pm | Permalink

    GB

    Yes the Government is being cynical. I’m sure the Liberals are too but that is another issue.

  958. 958
    Gary Bruce
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Yo Ho it appears that the Rudd huggers are afraid of Mr Hockey and that is fine by me because he’ll be leading us soon enough…

    You’re a Hockey sticker are you Glen? I hope you’re right. He is woeful on detail. All show, no punch.

  959. 959
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes, don’t you know that Keane is a Green partisan?

    Well I’m not and I’m saying the same thing.

  960. 960
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    Bob Brown must be going really bad if Piers Ackerman’s criticisms resonate.

    http://blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/piersakerman/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/crusdaing_green_is_a_lantern_for_tree_moths/

  961. 961
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:11 pm | Permalink

    Well I’m not and I’m saying the same thing.

    WOOSH.

    What happened to everyone’s sense of humour.

  962. 962
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    Yes the Government is being cynical

    You can call it what you like. If it means getting the thing passed, then it sounds like a good idea.

  963. 963
    evan14
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:12 pm | Permalink

    BRING ON SLOPPY JOE, SAVIOUR OF THE LIBERAL PARTY!
    LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL

  964. 964
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:13 pm | Permalink

    Bob Brown must be going really bad if Piers Ackerman’s criticisms resonate.

    If that’s a joke it’s a pretty good one. Unfortunately I don’t think it is.

    I think the only thing Brown will be feeling is vindication, given his critics are the likes of Akerman, Bolt and Abetz. =)

  965. 965
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:14 pm | Permalink

    If it means getting the thing passed, then it sounds like a good idea.

    Er, you realise that the government’s move just stopped it getting passed?

  966. 966
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:15 pm | Permalink

    My future candidates for the Leadership of the Libs…

    Hockey
    Billson
    Hunt
    Morrison

  967. 967
    Phin Tjhai
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:16 pm | Permalink

    Is Tanya pregnant again? if so, she seems to be pregnant often. how many kids has she got now?

    http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6677731,00.jpg

    Presenting The Minister of Youth:

    http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6677722,00.jpg

    Glen, just for you:

    http://www.news.com.au/common/imagedata/0,,6677743,00.jpg

    The Three Obnoxious.

  968. 968
    Aristotle
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Glen, posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:03 pm | Permalink

    “Dario someone should tell those nobs that it was an insect for crying out loud!”

    You never know, Glen. It may have had a little white head and been calling, “help me, please help me!”.

  969. 969
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:18 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    Apparently, Christine Milne upbraided “Bodgy” Bob over his fundraising activities.

    Was Brown ever really likely to be bankrupted?

  970. 970
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    The CPRS sheme will not be passed next week. The issue is, will be defeated or delayed.

    The Greens want it defeated, so do the Nats (but for different reasons). The Libs want it delayed.

    If X and Fielding vote against it what will the Libs do?

  971. 971
    Cuppa
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    All WorkChoices fans no doubt.

  972. 972
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:20 pm | Permalink

    You can call it what you like. If it means getting the thing passed, then it sounds like a good idea.

    I meant the CPRS, not the RET

  973. 973
    BK
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:22 pm | Permalink

    Yeah, shame on them for sticking Jodie Campbell up the back!
    What did she do to piss off Rudd?

    Was it Rudd being less than happy about Jodie’s (rather limited) display of cleavage a few months ago?

  974. 974
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:24 pm | Permalink

    I’m not sure why I bother responding to you, Greensborough Growler, because you run away sulking everytime, but here goes.

    Was Brown ever really likely to be bankrupted?

    I have no idea.

    On one hand, you have documented evidence from Forestry Tasmania threatening bankruptcy unless Brown forks over $240,000. So the question comes down to whether or not Brown has a lazy $240,000 lying around. Now most people would find that difficult to believe. It’s even more unlikely given he previously had to raise hundreds of thousands to pay other legal fees and his traditional sources of fundraising were drying up. So as to whether or not Brown has hundreds of thousands spare and was thus not at risk from bankruptcy, I suggest no.

    The only people questioning this (not that they are making claims and “alleging” information, nothing more) are Abetz and his cronies, Piers Akerman and Andrew Bolt. You can talk their word if you like, I don’t really mind.

  975. 975
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:25 pm | Permalink

    Hunt just said the US ets legislation is the “Gold Standard” for an ets.

    All the way with the USA. still lives.

  976. 976
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    I meant the CPRS, not the RET

    It’s not going to help any of them get passed – it just now makes sure that the RET won’t get passed either. So no RET, no CPRS but the government gets more stuff to bludgeon the opposition with.

  977. 977
    Generic Person
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:26 pm | Permalink

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HEvb4xVMP4g

  978. 978
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    972,

    As opposed to not being seen by the Emergency Dept UNLESS you pay up first.

  979. 979
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    Oz,

    “As Tasmanian Senator Eric Abetz told Parliament on Tuesday night: “Even then he did not detail donations for May to July 2008, nor has he disclosed donations received in the seven months since October 2008. There are up to 10 months missing. Clearly the Senator does not abide by the same accountability rules he so self-righteously insists be imposed on everybody else.”

    At most it would seem that Brown might still need something in the order of $100,000, a sum not beyond his own borrowing capacity if he were to mortgage the farm he owns or should he retire in 2010 and take a life-time parliamentary pension.

    In a roundabout fashion, Brown has conceded that his legal costs are covered by indicating that he will bankroll other anti-forestry campaigns, including a group of activists who chained themselves to machinery and blockaded the operations of a number of Tasmanian contractors.

    Abetz nailed Brown on their plight when he told Parliament: “I wonder how many well-meaning people who gave to save Senator Brown from phantom bankruptcy knew their donations could be used to defend these irresponsible antics?””

    Shame, Brown, Shame.

  980. 980
    Dario
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:32 pm | Permalink

    but the government gets more stuff to bludgeon the opposition with

    Which is what will get it passed. Eventually.

  981. 981
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:37 pm | Permalink

    GP

    Would you care to help a couple of US friends of mine who wrote:

    “My husband and I retired early, in large part because of my diagnosis.
    Our COBRA ends soon and we’re too young for Medicare. Conventional insurance
    won’t accept us so we’ll probably both end up with a state of IL
    insurance program that will cost around $1500/mo. for the two of us. ”

    The joys of US Health non-care. :(

  982. 982
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    Shame, Brown, Shame.

    And what Oz and the others don’t realise that the Greens are absolute Hypocrites when they attacked Rudd over the loan ute, and Brown’s reasoning behind blocking Ruddnet when he cited he wanted some legislation to limit Corporate Donations, yet accepts a Corporate Donation from dick Smith.

  983. 983
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:38 pm | Permalink

    take a life-time parliamentary pension.

    How do you do that?

    You think you’re on to a winner Greensborough Growler, which is what makes this so funny. But as Richard Farmer pointed out yesterday, you’re kidding yourself if you think people will side with lawyers and right-wing Murdoch hacks over someone who’s doing something to stop deforestation.

  984. 984
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:46 pm | Permalink

    Oz

    Bob Brown will lose nothing at all for his past, what he has lost is some moral superiority on donations in the future.

    When there are donation issues in the political sphere in the future, I bet he will not be the Green Senator who comments.

  985. 985
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:51 pm | Permalink

    I’m sure G.P. will appreciate that the World Bank has raised its predicted growth rate for China:
    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25654939-601,00.html

    So along with the Australian treasury, the IMF is the odd one out with their gloomy assessment of China’s growth.

  986. 986
    The Finnigans
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    i thought India is the world’s largest democracy.

    WASHINGTON - THE US government watchdog on religious freedom abroad criticised India on Wednesday for refusing to grant it visas, after their planned trip came under fire from Hindu conservatives.

    India joins only Cuba in refusing a visit by the US commission, which has been allowed to visit even nations whose records it frequently criticises such as China and Saudi Arabia.

    A delegation of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) had planned to leave on June 12 for India, where it has voiced concern about a rise in communal violence.

    http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Asia/Story/STIStory_392002.html

  987. 987
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:52 pm | Permalink

    There is a double standard from some commentators about the ETS and RET. The Greens are being criticised for saying they want a big ETS target and are making it an all-or-nothing vote. They would prefer nothing to less than perfect. But that is exactly what Labor are doing by putting the ETS and RET together and saying it’s all or nothing. Getting a RET passed would be good even without an ETS but they would prefer nothing.

  988. 988
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:54 pm | Permalink

    Major hilarity in S.A. politics, 17 out of the 22 Liberals want Martin-Hamilton-Smith dumped, but they can’t agree on who to replace him with.

    This hilarious online poll shows M-H-S’s problems, in a field of 5 he is coming LAST:
    http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/poll/display/0,22621,5040247-5006301-2,00.html

  989. 989
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 4:59 pm | Permalink

    But that is exactly what Labor are doing by putting the ETS and RET together and saying it’s all or nothing.

    They are completely different bills, the senate can bring on the RET without the ETS whenever it wants.

    The only thing they share in common is the fact the Liberals can’t make up their minds whether to support them or not, which is why the RET has been delayed until August so Turnbull can figure out how the hell to convince his party to vote for it.

  990. 990
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:01 pm | Permalink

    If the Senate wants to “de-couple” the two bills they can. They could have done it yesterday instead of sending the RET to an enquiry.

  991. 991
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:03 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn may as well pick a woman…it is a novalty as tories dont generally have female leaders cept Maggie :D

  992. 992
    ruawake
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:12 pm | Permalink

    I think Humphrey B. Bear is from SA, he is unemployed at the moment and may like the gig. ;)

  993. 993
    Diogenes
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:13 pm | Permalink

    SO

    That poll has to be stacked. I’ve never even heard of Mitch Williams. Who the hell is he? Evans was their best bet but he’s already dropped the ball once. Chapman is absolutely diabolical and would actually be worse than MHS. Isobel Redmond looks like their best option to me. They are in a whole world of pain.

  994. 994
    ShowsOn
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:15 pm | Permalink

    ShowsOn may as well pick a woman…it is a novalty as tories dont generally have female leaders cept Maggie

    Yeah Chapman will probably get the nod. Once she became deputy everyone just assumed she’d eventually become leader.

    I think it would be funny if they gave it to Ian Evans, he was hilariously bad the first time around that he would be extremely entertaining.

  995. 995
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    Makes being a Victorain Lib just that little bit better ShowsOn :D

    I’m still hoping for Ted to be taken out by anybody before the next election…

    I’m getting sick of voting for losers :(

  996. 996
    Greensborough Growler
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:21 pm | Permalink

    Glen

    Easily fixed. Vote Labor.

  997. 997
    Glen
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:22 pm | Permalink

    Why?

    They are worse than my mob only they’re in government ;)

  998. 998
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Thursday, June 18, 2009 at 5:24 pm |