Adelaide’s News Limited Sunday tabloid, the Sunday Mail, today carries a poll with a small sample of 483 showing state Labor with a two-party lead of 64-36 among Adelaide voters. Remarkable as that might sound, Antony Green calculates it’s in the same ballpark as the 2006 election, when the Adelaide two-party result was 62.6-37.4. Antony further observes that the Sunday Mail article absurdly compares this purely metropolitan result with the statewide two-party figure from 2006 to conjure a 7 per cent Labor swing that would cost the Liberals eight of their 14 seats. In reality, the poll points to a roughly status quo result, although that’s quite bad enough for the Liberals given the scale of Labor’s win in 2006.




271 Comments
Pages: « 1 … 2 3 4 [5] 6 » Show All
What happens if there is a 8 – 7 – 7 split?
How do they decide which candidate is eliminated? Do they have a special ballot just to work out which candidate is excluded from the last ballot?
Mitch Williams is an utter joke candidate. He may well end up delivering the leadership to Vickie Chapman if he’s not careful. Isobel Redman would have to be their best bet. She seems a fairly no nonsense sort of character in the limited media coverage I’ve seen of her. She would certainly be a more measured opoosition leader than MHS ever was. Decimated oppositions need safe steady leadership when they have a mountain to climb.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/07/2618858.htm
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25743714-2702,00.html
Ahh so there’ll be two votes to redistribute the votes of the candidate who comes last.
Well based on that article, I think Redmond will be leader come tomorrow.
Crikey’s take:
The Chapman faction IS what remains of The Liberal Movement! Except now it is inside the tent.
LOL! Isobel Redmond, the favourite to win the leadership of the S.A. Liberals tomorrow, was previously a member of the Labor party!
Source?
10 News
Seems spell-check isn’t working at the ‘Tiser today…
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25746118-2682,00.html
Will Isobel Redmond get rid of all the fundamentalist Christians who have infiltrated the South Australian Liberal Party????? Time will tell!!!!!
On http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/news/state/ ….
The article is yet to be updated though.
Here it is:
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25731562-5006301,00.html
Woah, I can’t believe Chapman is favourite.
Now that Hamilton-Smith has gone, I wonder if Robert Gerard will stick to his threat of ending donations?
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25716165-2702,00.html
Apparently Gerard’s contributions to the Liberals at the during the last state election was 50% of their total donations.
I wonder if Chapman supporters have just fed this story to the media to try to encourage others to support Chapman to make the result conclusive?
The worst result of all would be if after Wiliams is excluded, Chapman and Redmond both get 11 votes. but the second worse result would be 12 to 10 either way.
I hope Chapman gets in. I want to see more Liberal seats fall to Labor
Well considering the following:
Comes from “one of MHS’s strongest supporters”, and the last bit comes from Redmond supporters, I don’t reckon it’s a ploy by Chapman supporters… but who knows.
This person could just be pretending to be a MHS supporter. I mean how exactly would the journalist know how the person voted in a secret ballot?
I’ve gotta say, I’ve got no clue why they’re so keen to go for Chapman as leader. She’s got less charisma than any other leader I’ve ever seen except Eric Ripper. If they’re stupid enough to go with her, it’ll be a very entertaining election night – and hopefully we’ll be saying buh-bye to folks like Pisoni.
I suspect Williams-Redmond ticket would be far more successful, and would in all probability take a few seats off Liberals, but the state Liberals seem to be rather short of strategic sense. So I shall be looking forward to election night 2010 then…
In the Australian
and here in comments ShowsOn says:
I didn’t realize Pyne was a moderate but okay – if that is the case and Chapmen represents the small ‘l’ within the party then why does Pyne have bitterness towards her?
Is Chapmen really the moderate I have to barrack for? She is painful! Actually I suppose its a good thing if she’s elected – her being ‘moderate’ (sic) might move the middleground that the parties argue over slightly to the Left which may mean slightly less Rightwing ALP government policies plus the fact that personality wise she is not so charming and so not a vote winner makes her the perfect candidate. On the otherhand I think I couldn’t really stand seeing her face in the media all the time so perhaps my local MP Redmond will have to do. Otherwise I don’t really care – they are all conservative dinosaurs of an obsolete age anyway.
Pyne and Chapman are moderates and Pyne supports Chapman. You’re reading it wrong.
This is saying that the MHS camp has a lot of bitterness to Chapman and her supporters which include Pyne.
Ah
Thanks Bob1234
Isobel Redmond wins 13 to 9.
Bah! I wanted that hapless Chapman to win!
Her deputy will be finance spokesman Steve Griffiths, who beat Mitch Williams 8 votes to 6.
I hope Redmond blows up and Heysen falls to the Greens
http://www.saliberal.org.au/index.php/house-of-assembly/79-isobel-redmond-mp
Gee they’re quick!!
http://www.saliberal.org.au/index.php
And on the right!
http://martin2010.com.au/
Hahahaha
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25749782-5013945,00.html
Expect Labor to talk about this a lot.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,25749782-5013945,00.html
Seems Redmond was the worst choice of the lot!
http://www.independentweekly.com.au/news/local/news/general/isobel-redmond-new-liberal-leader/1562383.aspx
I wonder if it’ll be broadcast anywhere…
Probably on 891 AM.
Bah, all the TV News is dominated by Jackson. The SA Liberals are more important!
Not as yet…
891 AM – Redmond conference at midday.
http://twitter.com/PremierMikeRann/statuses/2524421435
Mmhm. Rann wants the Libs as much as I do to continue their infighting. He might say it but honestly, who’d believe it…?
Well none of the TV stations or 891 have broadcast the Redmond conference…
891 ABC broadcasting it now.
It was only a brief clip.
Sigh, looks like we’ll have to put up with her in my neck of the woods for at least 4 and a bit more years.
As I said, she’s smarter than Chapman but only just. I think there’s a reasonable chance she’ll stuff up big time prior to election day, potentially driving voters to the Greens in Heysen, the electorate that polled highest for the Greens at the last election. The Green vote has doubled in Newspoll since the last election, so I think the Greens will easily poll in the 20s/30s, maybe higher if she stuffs up.
http://www.borderwatch.com.au/archives/3308
Gotta love vexnews…
http://www.vexnews.com/news/5229/fresh-start-sa-libs-to-rise-from-the-ashes-with-redmond/
891 doing an extended broadcast of the interview.
SNIP: Stupid comment deleted – The Management.
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,25750660-5006301,00.html
God she’s ugly.
http://www.pollbludger.com/sa2006/heysen.htm
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/comments/0,22638,25750660-5006301,00.html
According to one of the comments, Chapman made a freudian slip on ABC news tonight – she “pledged her uncommitted-opps unconditional support to the new leader”
Y’know what’s a shame?
We’ll never know what Newspoll under Dodgygate MHS would have looked like.
Pages: « 1 … 2 3 4 [5] 6 » Show All