Reflections on the Miracle of Democracy at Work in the Greatest Nation on Earth

Reuters Poll Trend: 55.8-44.2

The latest Reuters Poll Trend weighted average of Newspoll, Morgan and ACNielsen results has federal Labor with a two-party lead of 55.8-44.2, presumably being weighed down a little by recent results from before the weekend.

UPDATE: Roy Morgan has joined in on the action with a small sample (546) phone poll including questions on leadership approval, which Morgan doesn’t normally do. It finds Malcolm Turnbull’s approval rating down to 25 per cent from 43 per cent in May, with his disapproval up a breathtaking 33.5 per cent to 62.5 per cent. Kevin Rudd’s approval rating on 63 per cent, up from 57.5 per cent in May, with his disapproval rating down from 33.5 per cent to 29 per cent. Labor holds leads of 56-44 on two-party preferred and 46 per cent to 39 per cent on the primary vote, which is actually quite mild by Morgan standards. Newspoll has also published its quarterly geographic and demographic breakdowns of recent polling by state, age, sex, and capitals/non-capitals.

Apart from that:

• Robert Taylor of The West Australian reports that Labor preselections for some highly winnable Liberal-held seats in Perth appear to be ”stitched up”. In the only two seats in the country which the Coalition gained from Labor in 2007, Cowan and Swan, those respectively named are Wanneroo mayor Jon Kelly and Slater & Gordon lawyer Tim Hammond. Kelly is interesting, as he ran as an independent against state Labor MP Margaret Quirk in Girrawheen at the 2005 election after a split in the Right faction. In Stirling, where decorated Iraq war veteran Peter Tinley failed to unseat current Shadow Workplace Relations Minister Michael Keenan in 2007, the nod is apparently set to be given to Karen Brown, former deputy editor of The West Australian and current chief-of-staff to Eric Ripper. Brown famously failed to win the new notionally Labor seat of Mount Lawley at the state election last September after suffering an 8 per cent swing, which many blamed on Alan Carpenter’s insistence that local member Bob Kucera make way for Brown. Peter Tinley is said to be holding out for a safe seat or a Senate position, and the unlikelihood of either suggests he will not be a starter at the next election. In Hasluck, which Sharryn Jackson recovered for Labor in 2007 after a term in the wilderness, Liberals are said by Taylor to be “working behind the scenes” to secure the endorsement of Mike Dean, who last week stepped down from his high-profile position as president of the Police Union.

• The ABC reports that Kathryn Hay will seek Labor preselection for Bass at next year’s state election. Hay is a former Miss Tasmania who became Tasmania’s first Aboriginal MP when elected at the age of 27 in 2002. After surprising everybody by dropping out at the 2006 election, Hay ran as an independent against Ivan Dean in the upper house seat of Windermere in May, and did very well to finish within 5 per cent of victory on the final count. With incumbent Jim Cox retiring, Michelle O’Byrne a sure bet for re-election, and Labor looking certain to win a second seat but very unlikely to pick up a third, the battle for the second seat is looking like a tussle between Hay, Beaconsfield mine disaster survivor Brant Webb, CFMEU forests division secretary Scott McLean (who famously came out in support of John Howard at the 2004 federal election) and Winnaleah school principal Brian Wightman, with only the latter looking an obvious also-ran.

Rick Wallace of The Australian reports that George Seitz, western Melbourne Labor Right potentate and state Keilor MP, proposes to publish a “warts and all” account of his career in politics. Seitz is being forced out after nearly three decades in parliament due to a Victorian Ombudsman’s report which probed into the involvement of various state MPs in goings-on at Brimbank City Council. The aforementioned Wallace article is worth reading for a broader overview of the episode’s far-reaching impact on the Victorian ALP.

Andrew Landeryou at VexNews reports that the closure of nominations has brought no challenges to sitting federal Liberal MPs in Victoria – including Kevin Andrews in Menzies, who was believed to be under threat from former Peter Reith staffer Ian Hanke.

Nick in comments informs us that according to a Channel Nine news report, Labor polling has it trailing the Coalition 57-43 on NSW state voting intention.

2,238 Comments

Pages: « 13 4 [5] 6 745 » Show All

  1. 201
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    OzPol Tragic,

    I’ve seen no evidence that the Liberals even consider (or try to project) where the Global On-line Village is heading, much less what will be expected of the current national government and its alternative (aka Opposition), even less what policies they will need to go to the next election and the one after. Nor will these be the only national policy areas they’ll have to address; they’re just the ones I know enough about to write a post like this.

    If the Libs had half a brain, they would have positioned themselves half a street ahead of Labor on these issues after their 2007 defeat and made it seem as though they were ahead of the curve and Rudd was struggling to keep up.

    Instead they just sat back on their one remaining “better economic manager’ laurels, felt sorry for themselves, believed that the electorate had made a terrible mistake that they would regret and come cowering back to the Conservative fold once they realised that Rudd was n ot the person they perceived him as being etc.

    Unfortunately, in each of these criteria, they are dead wrong anjd the MSM in trying so hard to reinforce this level of thinking, have done them and the country as a whole, “NO” favours whatsoever.

    Australia at present, with all the challenges it currently faces, needs a competent Opposition, willing to be adventurous, to meet with the Government in shaping suitable solutions to meet these challenges and the MSM should be pushing this for all it is worth for this and future generations and would benefit itself from a general public that has some level of trust in its motives and judgement.

    As it stands now, the Conservatives know that most of what the MSM is presenting is garbage to prop them up in their hour of need and the rest are so disillusioned they are not prepared to accept just about “anything” that the MSM are dishing up tp them, even if it is accurate and well founded.

    Oz-gate etc fail the test as Paul Kelly likes to remind us, (Rudd fails this test, Rudd fails that test, how will Labor deal with this test) and the MSM are now in a position of having virtually “NO” credibility with the general public which it relies upon for its survival.

    Its demise will be mostly all self inflicted and good riddance to bad rubbish.

  2. 202
    StephenD
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:17 pm | Permalink

    Scorpio, the whole travel thing seems like a beat-up to me. $8.3m since 2001? Boohoo. Compared to serious wastes of money – like terrorist hotline fridge magnets – this is a drop in the ocean.

    Fred Chaney is, IMHO, a bad target to choose in this regard. He wasn’t in any way arguing that his work is charitable (though it may be in some respects), but simply a public good. I’m a great believer in his work, so I’m happy to see the government spend some money to support it.

    As much as I don’t want to see that revolting little slug Howard spending more of the Nation’s money in future, I also don’t want to cut off my nose to spite my face.

  3. 203
    ruawake
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:20 pm | Permalink

    The problem the rabble have with the “debt and deficit” argument is that most people realise that debt is a necessary evil.

    I need a car, get a car loan. I need a house, get a mortgage. I need a fridge etc. etc.

    There are very few reasons why Govts. should run surpluses.

  4. 204
    polyquats
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:22 pm | Permalink

    Dr Kelly said that argument was flawed. "If they're doing charity work, this should be through an act of charity - not using taxpayers' money to portray themselves as being charitable," he said. "They're being charitable with other people's money."

    Well, I wouldn’t mind the travel funding if it was within certain parameters – for registered charities, local government organisations etc. But any travel for personal reasons, or involved in earning money (speaking tours!) should be off-limits. maybe the activity should be declared and approved before the travel is undertaken.

  5. 205
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:25 pm | Permalink

    He really needs to work out how to be more subtle than this.

    ltep, he should have stuck to Merchant Banking which he was at least passably good at.

  6. 206
    ruawake
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:27 pm | Permalink

    Polyquats

    The $8.3 million for ex MP’s Gold Card is for seven years. So lets set up an office to look into the money that is “wasted”.

    Betcha it costs more than it saves. :)

  7. 207
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    polyquats, scrap the lot. All taxpayers contribute to this rort.

    Unless the travel and expenses have “some” value at least to Australian taxpayers, then it is just a perk that is unjustifiable and should be confined to the dustbin of history.

  8. 208
    ltep
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:34 pm | Permalink

    Hear hear. No ex-politician should receive tax-payer funded travel.

  9. 209
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:35 pm | Permalink

    The ABC having a shot at Rudd for “Grocery Watch” on the 7.30 Report.

    Since Howard stacked the Board and Management, it has really gone overboard (especially its on-line offerings) in trying to be “balanced”! lol.

  10. 210
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:40 pm | Permalink

    scropio – wouldn’t it be Stateline?

  11. 211
    ltep
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    Criticising Grocery Watch is fair game. It was pointless from the beginning and, in the end, a huge waste of time, effort and money.

  12. 212
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    Mmmm. Red face time. This is a repeat on digital. Should be watching Stateline.

    Ouch!

  13. 213
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:43 pm | Permalink

    scropio

    Yeah, I deserve that, Grog!

  14. 214
    It's Time
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:51 pm | Permalink

    Perhaps someone can remind me.

    Wasn’t there a period in early 2008 when Turnbull was opposition treasury spokesman and was making suggestions in the media which seemed to be pre-empting government announcements? What were those issues?

    Should that be reviewed in the light of Grech’s recent behaviour?

  15. 215
    ruawake
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:55 pm | Permalink

    It’s Time

    Fuel Watch leaks.
    RBA – Treasury correspondence

    Were the main ones published.

  16. 216
    ltep
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    No, there were some Government announcements that the Opposition preempted and ‘called on’ the government to take action on.

    Then when the Government made the announcements the Opposition claimed that the Government had no ideas of their own.

  17. 217
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    scropio

    Yeah, I deserve that, Grog!

    Woops – sorry ’bout that.

  18. 218
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:00 pm | Permalink

    There was also the time Turnbull predicited the stimulus package would be $5b…. but it came out at $10b. Guess Godwin wasn’t in the loop on that one:
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/10/14/2390199.htm

    btw love the opening par:

    Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull says the Coalition will support a economic stimulus package which could be unveiled by the Government today.

  19. 219
    steve
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:02 pm | Permalink

    You mean this, it’s time?

    Turnbull, using his own financial contacts and expertise, powers of deduction and very likely a departmental mole, has been doing the same to Rudd - calling on him to take measures the Government already had in train.

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/10/26/1224955851153.html?page=2

  20. 220
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:18 pm | Permalink

    and very likely a departmental mole

    Gee, I wonder who…. where’s Sherlock Holmes when you need him? Columbo? Scooby Doo?

  21. 221
    steve
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:35 pm | Permalink

    There was a nice old COAG leak too.

    Now, there was a leak out of the COAG meeting, I think in Friday’s papers, that you told the Premiers the new figure is $200 billion. Now, simple arithmetic tells you that’s in the ballpark.

    TREASURER:

    Well, I can’t confirm that. I did brief the Premiers about the state of the global economy, particularly following my trip to the G20 last weekend. And also on the day I briefed the Premiers, we had the GDP figure for the March quarter in the United States, which was a contraction of six per cent on an annualised basis. And I simply made the point to the State Premiers - we’re all in it together. What we’ve got to do is make sure that our number one priority is jobs - jobs now through economic stimulus, and jobs into the future, particularly through nation building investment and planning for the future. And in the context of that, they may have drawn their own conclusions.

    http://www.treasurer.gov.au/DisplayDocs.aspx?doc=transcripts/2009/068.htm&pageID=004&min=wms&Year=&DocType=2

  22. 222
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:49 pm | Permalink

    Turnbull became leader after fewer than four years in Parliament. He aims to be prime minister in seven.

    Turnbull has been leader for only a matter of weeks, but has already begun detailed consultations with senior members of his team about the 2010 election. He is asking MPs to identify those marginal seats in their respective states the Coalition needs to win, and to recommend, or start looking for, locals who would make solid candidates.

    Turnbull is a man used to achieving his aims and he wants to win the next election, not the one after. He sees no reason why he cannot. Despite it being uncommon for a government to be pitched out after one term, the romantics point out parallels to events of 80 years ago.

    Back then, the conservative prime minister, Stanley Bruce, lost the election and his seat, a la John Howard. His conqueror, Labor's James Scullin, inherited the onset of the Great Depression and was tossed out after a term. Think Rudd and the GFC (global financial crisis), or KFC (Kevin's financial crisis, as some Coalition wags are calling it).

    A senior minister confided recently that Turnbull's disdain for the political orthodoxy makes him a threat because he does not play by the normal rules and conventions. He is as likely to blindside the Government as he is prone to shoot himself in the foot.

    Prophetic, but most of this is unfortunately, “wrong”.

    Turnbull will never be Prime Minister.

    Instead of looking for marginal seats to win, the Libs are now looking at what seats they already hold that they can “save”.

    He is not going to achieve his aims and it will be all the more difficult if he loses his constant drip feed of information on the Government from his moles and sources in various Government Departments.

    The circumstances are very different between Scullin’s dealings with the Great Depression and how Rudd is handling the GFC.

    The last paragraph is fairly correct though. Turnbull certainly does not play by the normal rules and conventions and has certainly shot himself in the foot and the rickoshey has bounced around the room and wounded many of his colleagues also.

  23. 223
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:52 pm | Permalink

    Struth, this thing posted itself before I had finished editing it and adding the link.

    http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2008/10/26/1224955851153.html

    “ricochet” even!

  24. 224
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:54 pm | Permalink

    Time story on Rudd – must be the International version rather than the Australian edition.
    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1908274-1,00.html

  25. 225
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    Sorpio, The most spot-on thing in the article:

    If science were to sequence Turnbull's DNA, there would be no embarrassment gene

    Perhaps if he had that gene he might become PM. Oh well. :-)

  26. 226
    steve
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Here’s another instance where Turnbull threw up a red herring to get a bit of publicity.

    The Rudd Government is awaiting a report on several insolvency-related issues from the Corporations and Markets Advisory Committee (CAMAC).

    A spokeswoman for Corporate Law Minister Nick Sherry said: "Rather than pre-empting the professional and independent work of CAMAC by calling for any particular set of reforms, such as simply lifting the regime that operates in the United States, which has its own range of very complex and historic problems, the Rudd Government will actually let CAMAC do its work."

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,24700862-36418,00.html

  27. 227
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    Grog, that Time article was quite good. I quite liked the finish.

    On the flight back east from Perth, Rudd glances at the necktie that he has cast aside before landing in Melbourne, where he will deliver another slew of speeches. He rubs his eyes, then launches into a defense of international activism. "You can sit around quietly on the global diplomatic circuit and get nowhere," he says, "or you can ball up a few ideas, some of which have some prospects." It's not a bad blueprint for any nation navigating a place in this globalized world. Makes you wonder whether Australia couldn't export that having-a-go spirit along with its iron ore, coal and gas. The world might be better for it.

    http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1908274-1,00.html

  28. 228
    Sertse
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 9:48 pm | Permalink

    I wish I was around by the original rise of Howard. (Heh, I made everyone look old). How exactly did a guy, surly part of the old guard, being the ex-treasurer, and associated with the then voted out govt survive the 10+ Hawke years in the wilderness, and being a badly beaten opposition leader etc, and Mr 11%, achieve to become our 2nd longest serving Prime Minister?

    Relating to current events, I’m just saying it is possible (with Turnbull); you just went through the last living example of it. Most are saying he’s quit if he doesn’t get his way, but I’m thinking his ego could he big enough to an eventual comeback – He’s not going to quit; he simply can’t stand to be wrong, and to “prove” he was right…

  29. 229
    steve
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:00 pm | Permalink

    Just happened to be in the right place between a recession and a decade long mining boom, Sertse.

  30. 230
    Gusface
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:15 pm | Permalink

    I think after ‘93, 3 factors scuttled the keating dream.

    1.keating himself
    2.structural eco. reforms “burning’ some punters
    3.Unlike hawke,keating was unmilling to bend to certain groups

  31. 231
    Gusface
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:17 pm | Permalink

    unmilling of course should read “unwilling”

  32. 232
    polyquats
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:34 pm | Permalink

    grrrrrrr Sales said “illegal boat people”. Why can’t these journos learn to say ‘refugees’.

  33. 233
    polyquats
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:42 pm | Permalink

    or ‘asylum seekers’

  34. 234
    Glen
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:49 pm | Permalink

    Polyquat they need to prove it first :D Sales is correct :D

  35. 235
    scorpio
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:55 pm | Permalink

    Glen, where have you been? To the footy?

  36. 236
    Peter Tucker
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    William: With incumbent Jim Cox retiring, Michelle O’Byrne a sure bet for re-election, and Labor looking certain to win a second seat but very unlikely to pick up a third, the battle for the second seat is looking like a tussle between Hay, Beaconsfield mine disaster survivor Brant Webb, CFMEU forests division secretary Scott McLean (who famously came out in support of John Howard at the 2004 federal election) and Winnaleah school principal Brian Wightman, with only the latter looking an obvious also-ran.

    Comment: Labor have some chance of picking up a third seat. At the risk of splitting hairs, I would say “unlikely” rather than “very unlikely”. Something like a 30% chance of getting three. They will get the third seat if the Greens’ Kim Booth misses. Booth just scraped in last time – it all depends how the pulp mill is running as a story come election day. Booth should hold, but …

    Also to the list of potential Labor candidates who could trouble the high-profile Hay and Webb you should add Michelle Cripps, who stood on the ticket in 2006 and got a thousand-odd votes. If she has learned from that experience, she must have some hope. At the moment there are seven hopefuls, and one is likely to miss pre-selection:

    Sitting members Michelle O’Byrne
    Brant Webb
    Kathryn Hay
    Michelle Cripps
    Scott McLean
    Rob Soward
    Brian Wightman

    See http://www.examiner.com.au/news/local/news/politics/one-bass-nominee-too-many-for-labor/1557719.aspx

  37. 237
    Helen2
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 11:03 pm | Permalink

    Grog @ 223, Scorpio @ 226, interesting date on that Time article – 13 July! Great article, thanks for the link.

  38. 238
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    Diogenes

    What was it that Gandhi might have said? First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win. I think we are definitely seeing the “fight” stage between old and new media.

    A good quote. I think on this site we have seen a similar tranformation taking place. Since the Freo Bi-Election the ALPers have made the transition from laugh to fight in their anti-Greens hysteria. The next step is…

  39. 239
    Frank Calabrese
    Posted Friday, July 3, 2009 at 11:35 pm | Permalink

    A good quote. I think on this site we have seen a similar tranformation taking place. Since the Freo Bi-Election the ALPers have made the transition from laugh to fight in their anti-Greens hysteria. The next step is…

    And what a surprise – the Greens make yet ANOTHER personal attack.

    Buid a bloomin Bridge – your pathetic whinings each time the bad ALP”ers expose your little lies proves you can dish it out, but you CANNOT take it.

    Pot Meet Kettle.

  40. 240
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 12:58 am | Permalink

    Frank
    You always remind me of an incident where some drunk and mildly mentally disabled guy was talking to my brother. His replies had nothing to do with what my brother had just said and finally he just had to say “sorry man, I just don’t get you”. I don,t interpret my words as either an “attack” or “personal” and they certainly weren’t intended as such. I’d say they refer to a hope for the future – a prediction for the future of this country. Your responce does seem in line with my theory that hostility from the alp types here towards the greens has been on the rise. I could be wrong but my guess is that most bludgers of all persuasions would agree.
    I beg of you this one request though? Can you please explain *in detail* the relevents of the pots kettle analogy to this discussion because right now with all due respect “sorry man, I just don’t get you”.

  41. 241
    The Heysen Molotov
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 1:02 am | Permalink

    Ps I’m NOT saying you are drunk or mildly mentally disabled and I am not trying to make a personal attack – just that we do not appear to operate on the same wavelength ever and that I can rarely follow your train of thought as I have said on other occasions. Perhaps we have very different personalities.

  42. 242
    Fulvio Sammut
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 1:24 am | Permalink

    I find the last two posts to be distasteful and unnecessary, to say the least.

  43. 243
    Dario
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    As do I

  44. 244
    It's Time
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    I see no problem with 241 and 242 when read together.

  45. 245
    ltep
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    As per usual, Diog is wRONg, again.

    Gandhi never said: “First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”.

    What Gandhi said was: “First you ground the cummin, then the coriendar, then add the garam Marsala, then you cook the Curry Madras”.

    wow a curry joke about an Indian person? Hilarious

  46. 246
    steve
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 7:39 am | Permalink

    Palin is to resign as Governor of Alaska.

    WASILLA, Alaska – Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin made a surprise announcement Friday that she is resigning from office at the end of the month without explaining why she plans to step down, raising speculation that she would focus on a run for the White House in the 2012 race.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090703/ap_on_re_us/us_palin_resigning

  47. 247
    BK
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 7:46 am | Permalink

    Steve,

    Now watch out for Palin as a presenter on Faux News.

  48. 248
    steve
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 7:50 am | Permalink

    Big possibility BK, she could double as candidate and political commentator for Faux News with their ethics and her previous beauty queen role.

  49. 249
    BK
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 7:59 am | Permalink

    Steve,

    And their dress code would require her to wear a short skirt.

    Seriously, Faux News is just a dog whistler to the right wing rump in the us.

    Unbelievable!

  50. 250
    Bushfire Bill
    Posted Saturday, July 4, 2009 at 9:00 am | Permalink

    Credit Where Credit’s Due Dept.

    Annabel Crabb writes a good one: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/lib-think-tank-running-on-empty-20090703-d7rk.html

    More like this please, Annabel.

Pages: « 13 4 [5] 6 745 » Show All